nathan e lensch vs. sophia rutschow 14-3-03127-0

165
August 12 2014 1:14 PM KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK NO: 14-3-03127-0 E-FILED IN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY CASE COVER SHEET / DOMESTIC & PROBATE CASES NATHAN E. LENSCH VS. SOPHIA RUTSCHOW Case Title________________________________________Case Number 14-3-03127-0________________ Atty/Litigant Daniel N C'ook_________________________ Bar # 34866 Phone (253) 58 1 -0660 Address 5920 1 00t_ St SW Ste 25 City LAKEWOOD_____________________________State_WA___________________ Zip 98499 Please check one category that best describes this case for indexing purposes. I f you cannot determine the appropriate category, please describe the cause o f action below. This will create a Miscellaneous cause which is not subject to PCLR 3. DOMESTIC RELATIONS ADOPTION / PATERNITY DISSOLUTION ___ Of Marriage with Child (DIC 3) FAM LAW ___ Of Marriage without Child (DIN 3) FAM LAW ___ Of Domestic Partnrshp w Child (DPC 3)FAM LAW ___ Of Domestic Prtnrshp w/o Child (DPN3)FAM LAW LEGAL SEPARATION ___ Of Marriage with Children (LSC 3) FAM LAW ___ Of Marriage without Children (LsN 3)FAM LAW ___ Of Domestic Partnership w Child (SPDC 3)FAM LAW ___ Of Domestic Prtnrshp w/o Child (SPD 3)FAM LAW ____Invalidity (INV 3) FAM LAW ___ Invalidity Domestic Partnership (INP 3) FAM LAW ___ Child Custody (CUS 3) CUSTODY _ Parenting Plan / Child Support (PPS 3) FAM LAW DOMESTIC RELATIONS ___ Foreign Judgment Domestic (FJU 3)Non PCLR ___ Modification of Custody (MDC 3)Mod of CUSTODY ___ Modification of Support Only (MDS 3) Non PCLR ___ Reciprocal, In County (RIC 3) Non PCLR ___ Reciprocal, Out of County (ROC 3) Non PCLR ____Committed Intimate Relationship (CIR) FAM LAW ____Mi scellaneous (MSC 3) Non P CLR Mandatory Wage As signment (MSC 3) Non PCLR Out of State Custody (MSC 3) Non PCLR Adoption (ADP 5) Non PCLR Confidential Intermediary (MSC 5) REV 4 Paternity (PAT 5) REV 9 URESA / UIFSA (PUR 5) REV 9 Relinquishment (REL 5) Non PCLR Terminate of Parent-Child Relation (TER 5) Non PCLR Vulnerable Adult Petition (VAP 5) Non PCLR Misc (MSC 5) REV 4 PROBATE / GUARDIANSHIP Absentee (ABS 4) REV 4 Disclaimer (DSC 4) Non PCLR Estate (EST 4) Foreign Will (FNW 4) RE 12 Guardianship (GDN 4) REV 4 Limited Guardianship (LGD 4) REV 4 Minor Settlement with Guardianship (MST 4) REV 4 Non-Probate Notice to Creditors (NNC 4) Non PCLR Will Only (WLL 4) Non PCLR Misc (MSC 4) REV 4 Guardianship of Estate (GDE) REV 4 Guardianship of Person (GDP) REV 4 Limited Guardianship of Estate (LGE) REV 4 Limited Guardianship of Person (LGP) REV 4 Trnst/Estate Dispute Resolution (TDR) RE 12 MISCELLANEOUS_________________ Revised 03/06/2014 Web cicssup-0026.pdf

Upload: eric-young

Post on 24-Dec-2015

27 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

NATHAN E LENSCH VS. SOPHIA RUTSCHOW 14-3-03127-0NATHAN E LENSCHDOB 09/19/19789106 59TH AVE SW LAKEWOOD, WA 98499253-273-2259SOPHIA RUTSCHOWSophia Alexandrea RutschowDOB 03/31/19819106 59TH AVE SW LAKEWOOD, WA 984999117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498253-590-7973Dan CookFAUBION, REEDER,FRALEY & COOK P.S.5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lakewood, WA 98499Phone: (253) 581-0660Abigail LenschSOPHIA RUTSCHOW DrunkmarijuanaAnnie RiceLucinda ParkAnne GlasscokPACCARJane Lensch 714-827-2003SCOTT RICHARD FOMBY (DOB 7/16/1979)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

S U P E R IO R C O U R T O F W A S H IN G T O N F O R P IE R C E C O U N T Y

CASE COVER SHEET / DOMESTIC & PROBATE CASES

NATHAN E. LENSCH VS. SOPHIA RUTSCHOWCase Title________________________________________Case Number 14-3-03127-0________________

Atty/Litigant Daniel N C'ook_________________________ Bar # 34866 Phone (253) 58 1 -0660

Address 5920 1 00t_ St SW Ste 25

City LAKEWOOD_____________________________State_WA___________________ Zip 98499

Please check one category that best describes this case for indexing purposes.I f you cannot determine the appropriate category, please describe the cause o f action below. This will create a Miscellaneous cause which is not subject to PCLR 3.

DOMESTIC RELATIONSADOPTION / PATERNITY

DISSOLUTION___ Of Marriage with Child (DIC 3) FAM LAW___ Of Marriage without Child (DIN 3) FAM LAW___ Of Domestic Partnrshp w Child (DPC 3)FAM LAW___ Of Domestic Prtnrshp w/o Child (DPN3)FAM LAWLEGAL SEPARATION___ Of Marriage with Children (LSC 3) FAM LAW___ Of Marriage without Children (LsN 3)FAM LAW___ Of Domestic Partnership w Child (SPDC 3)FAM LAW___ Of Domestic Prtnrshp w/o Child (SPD 3)FAM LAW____Invalidity (INV 3) FAM LAW___ Invalidity Domestic Partnership (INP 3) FAM LAW___ Child Custody (CUS 3) CUSTODY

_ Parenting Plan / Child Support (PPS 3) FAM LAW

DOMESTIC RELAT IONS___ Foreign Judgment Domestic (FJU 3)Non PCLR___ Modification of Custody (MDC 3)Mod of CUSTODY___ Modification of Support Only (MDS 3) Non PCLR___ Reciprocal, In County (RIC 3) Non PCLR___ Reciprocal, Out of County (ROC 3) Non PCLR____C ommitted Intimate Relationship (CIR) FAM LAW____Mi scellane ous (MSC 3) Non P CLR

Mandatory Wage As signment (MSC 3) Non PCLR Out of State Custody (MSC 3) Non PCLR

Adoption (ADP 5) Non PCLRConfidential Intermediary (MSC 5) REV 4Paternity (PAT 5) REV 9URESA / UIFSA (PUR 5) REV 9Relinquishment (REL 5) Non PCLRTerminate of Parent-Child Relation (TER 5) Non PCLRVulnerable Adult Petition (VAP 5) Non PCLRMisc (MSC 5) REV 4

PROBATE / GUARDIANSHIP

Absentee (ABS 4) REV 4 Disclaimer (DSC 4) Non PCLR Estate (EST 4)Foreign Will (FNW 4) RE 12Guardianship (GDN 4) REV 4Limited Guardianship (LGD 4) REV 4Minor Settlement with Guardianship (MST 4) REV 4Non-Probate Notice to Creditors (NNC 4) Non PCLRWill Only (WLL 4) Non PCLRMisc (MSC 4) REV 4Guardianship of Estate (GDE) REV 4Guardianship of Person (GDP) REV 4Limited Guardianship of Estate (LGE) REV 4Limited Guardianship of Person (LGP) REV 4Trnst/Estate Dispute Resolution (TDR) RE 12

MISCELLANEOUS_________________Revised 03/06/2014 Web cicssup-0026.pdf

Page 2: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY August 12 2014 1:14 PM

NATHAN E. LENSCHPetitioner(s)

Vs.

SOPHIA RUTSCHOWRespondent(s)

KEVIN STOCK

No. 14-3-03127-0 COUNTY CLERKNO: 14-3-03127-0

ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULEType of case: PPSEstimated Trial (days):Track Assignment: Res Schedule-Parenting PlanAssignment Department: 07Docket Code: ORSCS

Confirmation of Service 9/2/2014Sealed Acknowledgment/Denial of Paternity 9/30/2014Certificate of Parenting Class - Petitioner's (Must be filed on or before) 10/14/2014Certificate of Parenting Class - Respondent's (Must be filed on or before) 10/14/2014Set Settlement Conference Date with Judge/Commissioner JACK NEVIN 10/28/2014PlaintilTs/Petitioner's Disclosure of Primary Witnesses 12/16/2014Defendant's/Respondent's Disclosure of Primary Witnesses 1/6/2015Disclosure of Rebuttal Witnesses 1/20/2015Deadline for Filing Motion to Adjust Trial Date 2/3/2015Settlement Conference (To be held) Week of 3/17/2015Discovery Cutoff 3/24/2015Exchange of Witness and Exhibit Lists and Documentary Exhibits 4/7/2015Trial 4/21/2015 9:00

Unless otherwise instructed, ALL A ttorneys/Parties shall report to the trial court at 9:00 A M onthe date o f trial.

NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERIf the case has been filed, the plaintiff shall serve a copy of the Case Schedule on the defendant(s) with the summons and complaint/ petition: Provided that in those cases where service is by publication the plaintiff shall serve the Case Schedule within five (5) court days of service of the defendant's first response/appearance. If the case has not been filed, but an initial pleading is served, the Case Schedule shall be served within five (5) court days of filing. See PCLR 3.

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIESAll attorneys and parties shall make themselves familiar with the Pierce County Local Rules, particularly those relating to case scheduling. Compliance with the scheduling rules is mandatory and failure to comply shall result in sanctions appropriate to the violation. If a statement of arbitrability is filed, PCLR 3 does not apply while the case is in arbitration.

Dated: August 12, 2014

Judge JERRY COSTELLO Department 07

Page 3: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),

NATHAN E. LENSCH,

andPetitioner,

No.

Petition for Residential Schedule/ Parenting Plan and Child Support (PT)

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I. Basis

1.1 Cause of Action

This action is brought by (name) NATHAN LENSCH, petitioner, for a residential schedule/parenting plan and child support order for ABIGAIL LENSCH, (age) 6, residing with NATHAN LENSCH in PIERCE County, Washington.

1.2 Paternity Acknowledgment and Denial of Paternity

NATHAN LENSCH is the child’s acknowledged father and (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW is the mother of the child. Both parents signed the Paternity Acknowledgment, which was filed with the Washington State Registrar of Vital Statistics on or around November 3, 2007.

A copy of the child’s birth certificate or Paternity Acknowledgment issued by the State of Washington where the child was born, is filed with this petition under the Sealed Acknowledgment/Denial of Paternity/Birth Certificate Cover Sheet, form WPF PS 15.0150.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 1 of 4 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Petition for Parenting Plan and Child Support.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920- 100th St. SW #25

Lakewood, WA 98499 253-581-0660

Page 4: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1.3 Order Establishing Parentage

Does not apply.

1.4 Jurisdiction

The court has jurisdiction over the parties because (check all that apply):

A judgment and order establishing parentage was entered, or a Paternity Acknowledgment was signed by the parents and filed.

Respondent resided with the child in this state.

and the following parties are presently residing in the state of Washington:

NATHAN LENSCH.SOPHIA RUTSCHOW.

1.5 Period for Challenge to the Acknowledgment or Denial of Paternity (Pick only one)

A period of four years or more has passed since the date the Paternity Acknowledgment, and if required, the Denial of Paternity was filed with the Washington State Registrar of Vital Statistics.

1.6 Jurisdiction Over the Child

This court has jurisdiction over the child for the reasons set forth below.

This state is the home state of the child because

The child lived in Washington with a parent or person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately preceding the commencement of this proceeding.

1.7 Child Support

Support, including medical support, for the minor child has not been determined administratively by the Division of Child Support and the petitioner does want the court to address child support.

1.8 Residential Placement

It is in the child’s best interests for the court to enter the residential schedule/parenting plan proposed by (name) NATHAN LENSCH.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 2 of 4 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Petition for Parenting Plan and Child Support.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920-1 0 0 th St. SW #25

Lakewood, WA 98499 253-581-0660

Page 5: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

During the last five years, the child has lived:

in no place other than the state of Washington and with no person other than the declarant or a named party.

Claims to custody or visitation:

I do not know of any person other than a named party who has physical custody of, or claims to have custody or visitation rights to the child.

Involvement in any other proceeding concerning the child:

I have not been involved in any other proceeding regarding the child.

Other legal proceedings concerning the child:

I do not know of any other legal proceedings concerning the child.

1.9 Reimbursement

Does not apply.

1.10 Continuing Restraining Order

Does not apply.

1.11 Protection Order

Does not apply.

1.12 Other

Does not apply.

II. Relief Requested

The court is requested to enter an order that:

Adopts the residential schedule/parenting plan for the child as proposed by petitioner.

Determines support, including medical support, for the dependent child pursuant to the Washington State child support statutes.

Awards the tax exemption for the child to: the Petitioner.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 3 of 4 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Petition for Parenting Plan and Child Support.doc

253-581-0660

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920- 100th St. SW #25

Lakewood, WA 98499

Page 6: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Orders the respondent to pay past support, medical, and other expenses incurred on behalf of the child.

Awards court costs, guardian ad litem, attorney, and other reasonable fees.

Dated on this fl-px day of AUGUST 2014.

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY

DANIEL N. COOK, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

III. Declaration

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that I am the petitioner hereinabove named, that I have made the allegations contained in this petition based upon my first hand knowledge, and therefore believe that they are true.

Signed at (city) /L ck)OfL U / o , (state) ^c^ on (date) I ~ 2 -O /

NATHAN LENSCHi .

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 4 of 4 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Petition for Parenting Plan and Child Support.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920- 100th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 7: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15>

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No.ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), Summons (Petition for ResidentialSchedule/ Parenting Plan or Child

NATHAN E. LENSCH, Support)Petitioner, (SM)

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

To the Respondent: SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

1. The petitioner has started an action in the above court requesting that the court establish a Residential Schedule/Parenting Plan and/or an Order of Child Support. Additional requests, if any, are stated in the petition, a copy of which is attached.

2. You must respond to this summons and petition by filing a written response with the clerk of the court and by serving a copy of your response on the person signing this summons.

If you do not file and serve your written response within 20 days (60 days if you are served outside of the state of Washington) after the date this summons was served on you, exclusive of the date of service, the court may, without further notice to you, enter a default judgment against you ordering the relief requested in the petition. If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned person, you are entitled to notice before an order of default may be entered.

Summons (Pt Res Sched/PP or Child Sup) (SM) - Page 1 of 2 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF PS 15.0200 (6/2006) - CR 4.1, ROW4.26.100 FRALEY & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Summons.docx Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 8: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3. Your written response to the summons and petition must be on form WPF PS 15.0300, Response to Petition for Residential Schedule/Parenting Plan or Child Support (RSP). Information about how to get this form may be obtained by contacting the clerk of the court, by contacting the Administrative Office of the Courts at (360) 705-5328, or from the Internet at the Washington State Courts homepage:

4. If this action has not been filed with the court, you may demand that the petitioner file this action with the court. If you do so, the demand must be in writing and must be served upon the person signing this summons. Within 14 days after you serve the demand, the petitioner must file this action with the court, or the service on you of this summons and petition will be void.

5. If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so that your written response, if any, may be served on time.

6. One method of serving a copy of your response on the petitioner is to send it by certified mail with return receipt requested.

This summons is issued pursuant to RCW 4.28.100 and Superior Court Civil Rule 4.1 ofthe state of Washington.

http://www.courts.wa.gov/forms

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

Dated:Daniel N. Cook, WSBA 34866 Of Attorneys for Petitioner

File original of your response with the clerk of the court at:Clerk of the Superior Court Pierce County Court County-City Building 930 Tacoma Ave. S., Rm 110 Tacoma, WA, 98402

Serve a copy of your response on:Daniel N. CookFAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK P.S.5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Telephone: 253-581-0660

Summons (Pt Res Sched/PP or Child Sup) (SM) - Page 2 of 2WPF PS 15.0200 (6/2006) - CR 4.1, RCW4.28.100 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Summons.docx

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-1 00th Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 9: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING'

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No.ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), Notice Re: Dependent of a PersonNATHAN E. LENSCH, in Military Service

Petitioner, (NTDMP)and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

Notice. State and federal law provide protections to defendants/respondents who are on

active duty in the military service, and to their dependents. This notice only pertains to a

defendant/respondent who is a dependent of a member of the National Guard or a military

reserve component under a call to active service for a period of more than thirty (30)

consecutive days. Other defendants/respondents in military service also have protections

against default judgments not covered by this notice. Dependents of a service member are

the service member’s spouse, a service member’s minor child, or an individual for whom the

service member provided more than one-half of the individual’s support for one hundred

eighty days (180) days immediately preceding an application for relief.

Notice re: Dep. of Person in Military Service (NTDMP) - Page 1 of 2WPF DRPSCU 01.0185 (6/2006) - Laws of 2006, ch. 80 § 1(3) Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Notice re Military Dependent.docx

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 10: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

One protection provided is the protection against the entry of a default judgment in

certain circumstances. If you are the dependent of a member of the National Guard or a

military reserve component under a call to active service for a period of more than thirty (30)

consecutive days, you should notify the plaintiff/petitioner or, if the plaintiff/petitioner is

represented by an attorney, the plaintiff/petitioner’s attorney in writing of your status as such

within twenty (20) days of the receipt of this notice. If you fail to do so, then a court or an

administrative tribunal may presume that you are not a dependent of an active duty member

of the National Guard or reserves, and proceed with the entry of an order of default and/or a

default judgment without further proof of your status. Your response to the plaintiff/petitioner

or plaintiff/petitioner’s attorney about your status does not constitute an appearance for

jurisdictional purposes in any pending litigation, a waiver of your rights or a response to the

petition, complaint or other application for relief that was filed against you.

Dated August 12, 2014. FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK P.S.

By: DANIEL N. COOK, WSBA #34866 Of Attorneys for Petitioner

Notice re: Dep. of Person in Military Service (NTDMP) - Page 2 of 2WPF DRPSCU 01.0185 (6/2006) - Laws of 2006, ch. 80 § 1(3) Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Notice re Military Dependent.docx

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-1 00th Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 11: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

• Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,andSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent.

No.

Motion/Declaration for Ex Parte Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause (MTSC)

I. Motion

Based upon the declaration below, the undersigned moves the court for a temporary order and order to show cause.

1.1 Ex Parte Restraining Order

A temporary restraining order should be granted without written or oral notice to the other party or the other party’s lawyer because immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result before other party or the other party’s lawyer can be heard in opposition. This order should restrain or enjoin:

BOTH PARTIES from disturbing the peace of the other party or of any child.

Mtn/Decl for Ex Parte Restraining Ord (MTSC) - Page 1 of 5 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF DR 04.0150 Mandatory (07/2013) - CR 65 (b); RCW26.09.060. FRALEY & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\PleadingsWlotion for Ex Parte Restraining Order.dOCX Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 12: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

BOTH PARTIES from removing any of the child from the state of Washington.

The other party should be required to appear and show cause why these restraints should not be continued in full force and effect pending final determination of this action.

1.2 Other Ex Parte Relief

Order that NATHAN LENSCH shall be the parent with whom the child(ren) reside until the hearing.

Order that both parties submit to an ETG (alcohol) UA today before close of business at Crossroads Treatment Center at 10828 Gravelly Lake Dr SW, Lakewood, WA 98499 and that each party set up and submit to random UA testing at least once weekly for ETG (alcohol) UA between now and the hearing date set forth above.

Order that neither parent allow the child to have any contact with SCOTT FOMBY.

1.3 Surrender of Deadly Weapons

Does not apply.

1.4 Other Temporary Relief

The Respondent should also be required to appear and show cause why the court should not enter a temporary order which:

Orders child support as determined pursuant to the Washington State child support statutes.

Approves the parenting plan which is proposed by NATHAN LENSCH

Appoints a guardian ad litem on behalf of the minor child.

1.5 Other

Does not apply.

DATED this j Z day of August 2014

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA 34866 Attorney for Respondent

Mtn/Decl for Ex Parte Restraining Ord (MTSC) - Page 2 of 5WPF DR 04.0150 Mandatory (07/2013) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060. Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Motion for Ex Parte Restraining Order.d0CX

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-1 00th Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 13: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

II. Declaration

2.1 Injury to be Prevented

The ex parte restraining order requested in paragraph 1.1 and 1.2 above is to prevent the following injury (define the injury):

Physical and emotional harm to the child resulting from the mother’s drunkenness. The mother is drinking to the point of insobriety every night, has passed out on occasion and has come home extremely late or not at all some nights. The child is not in a stable home and is living out of a suitcase.

The mother’s drunkenness has led to at least two other domestic violence charges in the past, and many other uncharged domestic violence incidents.

The mother is also involved in an intimate relationship with SCOTT RICHARD FOMBY (DOB 7/16/1979). One of the mother’s past domestic violence charges involved SCOTT FOMBY. SCOTT FOMBY has a significant criminal history of his own, including burglary, residential burglary and robbery. Abigal should have no contact with SCOTT FOMBY.

2.2 Reasons why the Injury may be Irreparable

This injury may be irreparable because:

The father and mother originally agreed that the mother would live with a friend and that the mother would not drink when she had Abigal. After less than a week the mother was kicked out of the friend’s home because she was drinking. The mother did not follow the agreement to abstain from and the child should not be in her care until she demonstrates her ability to stay sober and maintain an appropriate place for Abigal to live.

2.3 Clear and Convincing Reasons why Weapons Should be Surrendered

Does not apply.

2.4 Reasons for a Temporary Order

It is necessary that the court issue a temporary order with the relief requested in paragraph 1.4 above for the reason set forth below:

Mtn/Decl for Ex Parte Restraining Ord (MTSC) - Page 3 of 5WPF DR 04.0150 Mandatory (07/2013) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060. Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Motion for Ex Parte Restraining Order.docx

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-1 00th Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 14: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2.5 Service Member or Dependent of Service Member

Does not apply.

2.6 Was notice of this request for an emergency order given to the other party or lawyer?

Yes. Explain what efforts have been made to give written or oral notice to the other party or other party’s lawyer:

My attorney called Sophia on August 11, 2014, and said that we would be in court on August 12, 2014, in the afternoon. Sophia called me after getting my attorney’s message and said she would be there. I went home on August 12, 2014, and discovered that a rock had been thrown through a window in the apartment that Sophia and I formerly shared.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE

STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed at (city) L / !)&£.cuOoO______ , (state) on (date) £ ? // ?■ (f/Lf

Nathan Lensch

Do not attach financial records, personal health care records or confidential reports to this declaration. Such records should be served on the other party and filed with the court using one of these cover sheets:1) Sealed Financial Source Documents (WPF DRPSCU 09.0220) for financial

records2) Sealed Personal Health Care Records (WPF DRPSCU 09.0260) for health

records3) Sealed Confidential Report (WPF DRPSCU 09.270) for confidential reports

If filed separately using a cover sheet, the records will be sealed to protect your privacy (although they will be available to all parties in the case, their attorneys, court personnel and certain state agencies and boards.) See GR 22(C)(2).

Mtn/Decl for Ex Parte Restraining Ord (MTSC) - Page 4 of 5WPF DR 04.0150 Mandatory (07/2013) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060. Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Motion for Ex Parte Restraining Order.dOCX

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 15: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

August 12 2014 1:14 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTONCOUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH, No.

NATHAN E. LENSCH,Child(ren),

DECLARATION OF ANNIE RICEPetitioner,

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I, ANNIE RICE, make the following statement on the basis of my personal knowledge.

I was one of SOPHIA RUTSCHOW’s best friends. When she and NATHAN separated

my husband and I agreed she could live in our home while she got on her feet. We knew she

had a drinking problem and said she could not be drinking when she was in our home. She

promised us she would not drink. Unfortunately, SOPHIA broke that promise and drank

nearly every night she lived with us.

SOPHIA’S problems with alcohol are very serious. When she drinks hard alcohol she

gets out of control. Once we had her over for a BBQ and she drank and she was literally

hitting and biting people after she was drunk. When SOPHIA is drunk she tends to increase

her paranoia level - sometimes saying things that do not make sense.

DECLARATION OF ANNIE RICE - Page 1 of 2 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Annie Rice 2.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 16: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SOPHIA lies and tries to hide her alcohol use. SOPHIA actually passed out on our

front porch this week while she was staying with us. I had no idea she had been drinking that

much because she was hiding it from me but finally I found her on the porch totally inebriated.

One night this week did not come home until very late and I discovered she had been out

drinking and she had ABBY with her and drove home drunk. SOPHIA was not able to live

with us even one week without drinking. This is concerning and I do not believe she can

abstain from alcohol even when she is responsible for ABBY.

SOPHIA’S parenting is not good. SOPHIA has always been a friend but I was very

concerned after she actually lived with us for a week about how she cared for ABBY. As I

mentioned above, SOPHIA was driving with ABBY while intoxicated. SOPHIA put ABBY to

bed without pajamas or brushing her teeth. ABBY wore the same clothes two days in a row.

I have concerns about the SOPHIA’S other friends. I know she procures marijuana

from friends illegally. I know her boyfriend is a convicted felon who served time in prison in

the last couple of years. I know her boyfriend has several domestic violence incidents on his

record. SOPHIA has personally told me she does not always understand her boyfriend and

she is worried about his mental health.

After living with SOPHIA for a week it is not in ABBY’s best interest for SOPHIA to be

the primary care provider for her even though I was formerly one of SOPHIA’S best friends.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE

OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

(state) \k /j% TT (date)

ANNIE RICE

DECLARATION OF ANNIE RICE - Page 2 of 2S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Annie Rice.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S. 5920-100 th St. SW #25

Lakewood, WA 98499 253-581-0660

Page 17: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

August 12 2014 1:24 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY

NATHAN E. LENSCH

Petitioner(s),

vs.

No. 14-3-03127-0

NOTE FOR COMMISSIONER'S CALENDAR

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Respondent(s)

TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND TO:

Name: SOPHIA RUTSCHOW Phone:Address: 9106 59TH AVE SW LAKEWOOD, WA 98499 Respondent

Please take notice that an issue of law in this case will be heard on the date and time shown below:

Pierce County Superior Court, County-City Building - 930 Tacoma Ave S - Tacoma, WA 98402

Motion - Temporary Order Calendar: Show Cause/Family Law

CALENDAR DATE: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:00 AM

WORKING COPIES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO COMMISSIONERS SERVICES ROOM 140, BEFORE 12:00 NOON TWO COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING

DATED: August 12, 2014.

NAME: Daniel N Cook

ADDRESS: 5920 100th St SW Ste 25LAKEWOOD, WA 98499-2751

Signed: /s/ Daniel N Cook

Phone: (253) 581-0660

WSBA#: 34866For: Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Note for Commissioners Calendar (ntc.rptdesign) 1 of 1

Page 18: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

August 12 2014 1:50 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child , PROPOSEDNATHAN E. LENSCH, PARENTING PLAN

Petitioner, (PPP)andSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent.

This parenting plan is proposed by NATHAN LENSCH.

It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed:

I. General Information

This parenting plan applies to the following children:

Name AgeABIGAIL LENSCH Age: 6

II. Basis for Restrictions

Under certain circumstances, as outlined below, the court may limit or prohibit a parent’s contact with the child and the right to make decisions for the children.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 1 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 19: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2.1 Parental Conduct (RCW 26.09.191 (1), (2))

Does not apply.

2.2 Other Factors (RCW 26.09.191 (3))

The Respondent/Mother’s involvement or conduct may have an adverse effect on the children’s best interests because of the existence of the factors which follow:

A long-term impairment resulting from drug, alcohol, or other substance abuse that interferes with the performance of parenting functions.

III. Residential Schedule

The residential schedule must set forth where the child shall reside each day of the year, including provisions for holidays, birthdays of family members, vacations, and other special occasions, and what contact the child shall have with each parent. Parents are encouraged to create a residential schedule that meets the developmental needs of the child and individual needs of their family. Paragraphs 3.1 through 3.9 are one way to write your residential schedule. If you do not use these paragraphs, write in your own schedule in Paragraph 3.13.

3.1 Schedule for Child Under School Age

Does not apply.

3.2 School Schedule

Upon enrollment in school, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother:

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, from Friday 6:00 p.m. to Monday 6:00 p.m. every other week.

After the mother has three months of clean weekly random UAs and after the mother has established a long-term residence suitable for Abigal (See Paragraph 3.10) then the schedule will be with the mother:

Every other week with the exchanges on Sunday evening at 6:00 p.m.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 2 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253)581-0660

Page 20: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3.3 Schedule for Winter Vacation

The child shall reside with the father during winter vacation, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Winter Vacation shall be defined as commencing the day after school lets out for the Winter Vacation Break and concluding on the day before school resumes.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10,

In even numbered years, the mother shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. until December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In odd numbered years, the mother shall have the child from December 24th 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.In odd numbered years the father shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. and conclude on December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In even numbered years the father shall have the child from December 24th at 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.

3.4 Schedule for Other School Breaks

The child shall reside with the father during spring break, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Spring break with the mother even years.

3.5 Summer Schedule

Upon completion of the school year, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Same as school year schedule.

3.6 Vacation With Parents

Each parent shall have two weeks uninterrupted with the child for vacation during the summer months when the child are off from school.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Each parent shall notify the other parent in writing of his or her two weeks of vacation no later than May 1 of

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 3 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 21: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

each year. If there is a conflict in vacation dates the father’s choice will control in odd years and the mother’s choice will control in even years.

3.7 Schedule for Holidays

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10:

The residential schedule for the child for the holidays listed below is as follows:

With Mother With Father(Specify Year (Specify YearOdd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

New Year’s Day See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3Martin Luther King Day * *Presidents’ Day k kMemorial Day k *Easter Odd EvenJuly 4th Even OddLabor Day * *Veterans’ Day Odd EvenThanksgiving Day Even OddChristmas Eve See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3Christmas Day See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3

Holidays marked with an asterisk (*) shall be spent with the parent who is entitled tothe adjoining weekend.

Holidays shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Holiday at 8:00 p.m.

3.8 Schedule for Special Occasions

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10:

The residential schedule for the child for the following special occasions (forexample, birthdays) is as follows:

With Mother With Father(Specify Year (Specify YearOdd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

Mother’s Day EveryFather’s Day EveryHalloween Even OddChild’s Birthday Odd Even

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 4 of 10 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, FRALEY & COOK, P.S..181; .187; .194 5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia Lakewood, WA 98499S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 22: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

If the Special Occasion is on a non-school day, the Special Occasion shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Special Occasion at 8:00 p.m.

If the Special Occasion is on a school day, the Special Occasion shall be from after school on the day of the Special Occasion until the8:00 p.m. on the day of the Special Occasion.

3.9 Priorities Under the Residential Schedule

Paragraphs 3.31 - 3.8, have priority over paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2, in the following order:

Rank the order of priority, with 1 being given the highest priority:2 holidays (3.7) 4 school breaks (3.4)1 special occasions (3.8) 6 summer schedule (3.5)3 winter vacation (3.3) 5 vacation with parents (3.6)

3.10 Restrictions

RANDOM UAs

Mother shall sign up for random weekly UAs with Crossroads Treatment Center at 10828 Gravelly Lake Dr SW, Lakewood, WA 98499. Father shall pay for the UAs. The UAs shall test for ETG (alcohol) and a basic six panel major drugs. These random UAs shall continue until the mother has had three months of consecutive clean UAs every week.

SUPERVISED VISITATION

So long as mother’s UAs are clean then no supervised visitation shall be required.

If mother’s UAs show non-prescribed drug or alcohol use then Mother’s visitation shall be supervised. The visits may be supervised by a friend or family member from the mother’s family who is known to and approved by the father. During the period of supervised visits, the visits shall occur one time per week for two to four hours per visit. The supervised visits shall be scheduled and arranged in conjunction with the children’s school schedule and the visitation supervisor’s schedule.

The mother’s visits will remain supervised until all of the following conditions have been met for a period of two consecutive months:

1. Two months of clean UAs.2. Mother has had consistent supervised visitation;

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 5 of 10WPF PS 01,0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 23: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3. Mother has demonstrated the ability to provide food, shelter and a safe, nurturing home environment

4. Mother has demonstrated the ability to maintain safe and reliable transportation for the child in the event of an emergency.

5. Mother has maintained the same residence.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL EVALUTION WITH PARENTING ASSESSMENT

If the mother has three dirty UAs in a two month period, then the mother shall complete a Crossroads drug and alcohol evaluation with parenting assessment, which shall include collateral contacts, and shall complete any follow-up treatment recommended by Crossroads.

The mother shall sign an authorization for release of information to Petitioner/father Nathan Lensch for all assessments and records (including all UA results) for the treatment program ordered above. Mother shall also arrange to have any and all progress reports filed directly with the court and sent directly to the mother.

SAFETY OF MOTHER’S RESIDENCE AFTER SUPERVISED VISITATION

After supervised visitation is not required pursuant to the paragraph above, then prior to any unsupervised visitation being required the mother SHALL provide to the father her current address, the full name and date of birth of all adults (over 18) of everyone in the household, and if the father questions the validity of the residence, shall permit an inspection of the residence. The father has the right to refuse visitation if the home environment is unsatisfactory and the father shall then note a hearing for further instructions and for a determination by the court of whether visitation should be allowed or if visitation should be supervised until the problematic conditions in the home are remedied.

3.11 Transportation Arrangements

Transportation costs are included in the Child Support Worksheets and/or the Order of Child Support and should not be included here.Transportation arrangements for the child, between parents shall be as follows:

Father shall provide transportation while mother’s visitation is supervised.

When visitation is unsupervised, transportation shall be shared equally with the receiving parent picking up the child at the start of his or her residential time.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 6 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 24: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3.12 Designation of Custodian

The child named in this parenting plan are schedule to reside the majority of the time with the father. This parent is designated the custodian of the child solely for purposes of all other state and federal statutes which require a designation or determination of custody. This designation shall not affect either parent’s rights and responsibilities under this parenting plan.

3.13 Other

Both parents shall provide a safe, sanitary home for the child at all times.

Both parents shall provide adequate bedrooms for the child to sleep in a comfortable home environment that is not crowded.

Both parents shall refrain from use of all illegal drugs or prescription medication except as directed by a physician with a lawful prescription.

Neither parent shall transport, nor allow any other individual to transport, the child in a vehicle except with by a driver with a valid driver’s license, in an insured vehicle and using all lawful child safety restraints.

3.14 Summary of RCW 26.09.430 - .480, Regarding Relocation of a Child

This is a summary only. For the full text, please see RCW 26.09.430 through26.09.480.

If the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time plans to move, that person shall give notice to every person entitled to court ordered time with the children.

If the move is outside the children’s school district, the relocating person must give notice by personal service or by mail requiring a return receipt. This notice must be at least 60 days before the intended move. If the relocating person could not have known about the move in time to give 60 days’ notice, that person must give notice within 5 days after learning of the move. The notice must contain the information required in RCW 26.09.440. See also form DRPSCU07.0500, (Notice of Intended Relocation of A Child).

If the move is within the same school district, the relocating person must provide actual notice by any reasonable means. A person entitled to time with the child may not object to the move but may ask for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

Notice may be delayed for 21 days if the relocating person is entering a domestic violence shelter or is moving to avoid a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to health and safety.

If information is protected under a court order or the address confidentiality program, it may be withheld from the notice.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 7 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 25: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A relocating person may ask the court to waive any notice requirements that may put the health and safety of a person or a child at risk.

Failure to give the required notice may be grounds for sanctions, including contempt.

If no objection is filed within 30 days after service of the notice of intended relocation, the relocation will be permitted and the proposed revised residential schedule may be confirmed.A person entitled to time with a child under a court order can file an objection to the child’s relocation whether or not he or she received proper notice.

An objection may be filed by using the mandatory pattern form WPF DRPSCU07.0700, (Objection to Relocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule). The objection must be served on all persons entitled to time with the children.

The relocating person shall not move the child during the time for objection unless: (a) the delayed notice provisions apply; or (b) a court order allows the move.

If the objecting person schedules a hearing for a date within 15 days of timely service of the objection, the relocating person shall not move the child before the hearing unless there is a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to the health or safety of a person or a child.

IV. Decision Making

4.1 Day-to-Day Decisions

Each parent shall make decisions regarding the day-to-day care and control of each child while the child is residing with that parent. Regardless of the allocation of decision making in this parenting plan, either parent may make emergency decisions affecting the health or safety of the children.

4.2 Major Decisions

Major decisions regarding each child shall be made as follows:Education decisions fatherNon-emergency health care fatherReligious upbringing father

4.3 Restrictions in Decision Making

Sole decision making shall be ordered to the father for the following reasons:

One parent is opposed to mutual decision making, and such opposition is reasonably based on the following criteria:

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 8 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253)581-0660

Page 26: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(a) The existence of a limitation under RCW 26.09.191;(b) The history of participation of each parent in decision making

in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a);(c) Whether the parents have demonstrated ability and desire to

cooperate with one another in decision making in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a); and

(d) The parents’ geographic proximity to one another, to the extent that it affects their ability to make timely mutual decisions.

V. Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this dispute resolution process is to resolve disagreements about carrying out this parenting plan. This dispute resolution process may, and under some local court rules or the provisions of this plan must be used before filing a petition to modify the plan or a motion for contempt for failing to follow the plan.

Disputes between the parties, other than child support disputes, shall besubmitted to (list person or agency):

mediation by Pierce County Dispute Resolution Center.

The cost of this process shall be allocated between the parties as follows:50% petitioner; 50% respondent

The dispute resolution process shall be commenced by notifying the other partyby written request via certified mail:

In the dispute resolution process:

(a) Preference shall be given to carrying out this Parenting Plan.(b) Unless an emergency exists, the parents shall use the designated process

to resolve disputes relating to implementation of the plan, except those related to financial support.

(c) A written record shall be prepared of any agreement reached in counseling or mediation and of each arbitration award and shall be provided to each party.

(d) If the court finds that a parent has used or frustrated the dispute resolution process without good reason, the court shall award attorneys’ fees and financial sanctions to the other parent.

(e) The parties have the right of review from the dispute resolution process to the superior court.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 9 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pteadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 27: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

VI. Other ProvisionsThere are no other provisions.

VII. Declaration for Proposed Parenting Plan

(Only sign if this is a proposed parenting plan.) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that this plan has been proposed in good faith and that the statements in Part II of this Plan are true and correct.

Nathan Lensch, Petitioner Date and Place of Signature

VIII. Order by the Court

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the parenting plan set forth above is adopted and approved as an order of this court.

WARNING: Violation of residential provisions of this order with actual knowledge of its terms is punishable by contempt of court and may be a criminal offense under RCW 9A.40.060(2) or 9A.40.070(2). Violation of this order may subject a violator to arrest.

When mutual decision making is designated but cannot be achieved, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the issue through the dispute resolution process.

If a parent fails to comply with a provision of this plan, the other parent’s obligations under the plan are not affected.

Dated:

Presented by:FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Judge/Commissioner

Approved and agreed by:Notice of presentation waived:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

__________________, WSBA #_____Attorney for Respondent

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Nathan Lensch, Petitioner Sophia Rutschow, Respondent

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 10 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 28: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICI

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGT

August 12 2014 1:50 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of:ABIGAL LENSCH, No. I f - 3 - 0 3 . / J - 7 - 0

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH, DECLARATION OF

Petitioner, NATHAN LENSCHand

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I, NATHAN LENSCH, make the following statement on the basis of my personal

knowledge.

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW and I were never married but we lived together for seven (7)

years. SOPHIA and I had one child together, ABIGAL LENSCH, who is now six years old. I

was present at the hospital when ABIGAL was born. I have lived with ABIGAL her entire life.

SOPHIA and I decided to end our relationship several months ago. We continued

living together in a peaceful manner while SOPHIA made arrangements to move out. She

had to find a place to live and get a job. SOPHIA recently became employed and she moved

in with a friend.

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 1 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK P S

5920-1 0 0 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 29: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

RESIDENCES OF THE PARENTS

Both SOPHIA and I live in Lakewood, Washington. I do not know exactly where

SOPHIA lives because she was kicked out of the first friend’s home she was going to live

with. I know SOPHIA’S new residence with another friend is in Lakewood but I do not havge

the exact address.

WORK SCHEDULES OF THE PARENTS

I work at PACCAR in Algona, Washington. I start my shift at 6:30 a.m. and end my

shift at 3:00 p.m. I generally leave my house around 5:30 a.m. and I am home between 3:30

p.m. and 4:00 p.m. depending upon traffic.

SOPHIA works at a deli in Lakewood. She works Monday through Friday one week

and Tuesday through Saturday the next week. She generally works from late morning to 4:00

p.m. or 5:00 p.m.

SCHOOL AND DAYCARE SCHEDULE FOR ABIGAL INCLUDING SUMMER

Last year ABIGAL attended at a school near our house. This year she will be attending

Park Lodge Elementary School in Lakewood. We changed schools to be closer to SOPHIA’S

work location. Park Lodge hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. We will utilize YMCA after­

school care program which is on-site at Park Lodge. I can pick ABIGAL up within an hour or

so of dismissal when I return from work. In the mornings, I can drop ABIGAL off at SOPHIA’S

residence prior to leaving for work if SOPHIA is clean and sober. My concern is that SOPHIA

will not be clean and sober (see discussion below) and therefore, I am probably going to

utilize a commercial daycare in Lakewood which transports to ABIGAL’s school. For the

remainder of the summer my mother will be here in Lakewood and can watch ABIGAL while I

am at work.

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 2 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK P.S.

5920-100 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 30: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

RCW 26.09.191 FACTORS - ALCOHOL ABUSE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

SOPHIA and I have both expressed concerns to each other about alcohol use after we

separated. SOPHIA drank a lot during our relationship. Her problems with alcohol are quite

severe. This was troublesome while we were together, but at least I was there to protect

ABIGAL wen SOPHIA overindulged. There were many times when SOPHIA passed out in

our house due to over consumption of alcohol. There were several times when SOPHIA left

to go drinking in the evening and did not return at all until later the next afternoon. Sometimes

she returned at 4:00 or 5:00 a.m. in the morning but she was still totally drunk and always

passed out as soon as she got home. On these occasions I had to call in to work and take a

sick day because I could not leave ABIGAL home alone or with SOPHIA passed out.

I have been around SOPHIA many times when she is drunk. When she is drunk her

behavior is violent and erratic. SOPHIA was actually charged with domestic violence against

me stemming from an incident where she assaulted me with an alarm clock while I was laying

in bed with ABIGAL. The case was dismissed after the Lakewood police officer who took the

report left the police force but this is just one of many incidents where SOPHIA lost control

and was violent when she was drinking. Her former, and now current (again) boyfriend,

SCOTT RICHARD FOMBY (DOB 07/16/1979), was a victim in one of her domestic violence

criminal charges. There was only one time I called the police on SOPHIA and she was

charged but she has assaulted me many times during our relationship. SOPHIA has thrown a

TV remote at me, SOPHIA has given me a black eye and SOPHIA has hit me many times

without leaving a mark visible outside of my clothing.

SOPHIA gets angry easily. She is very erratic and her mood swings can be scary. I

believe SOPHIA would benefit from an evaluation and medical treatment for her emotional

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 3 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920- 100th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 31: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

and psychological stability and SOPHIA has refused to seek help while we were together.

SOPHIA’S untreated mental health condition is exacerbated by her drinking. SOPHIA has a

long history of drinking problems and of getting violent and erratic when she is drunk.

SOPHIA is also less attentive to ABIGAL’s needs when she is drinking. Generally,

SOPHIA and I would share the tasks related to caring for ABIGAL equally. I would bathe her

and get her dressed for bed and tuck her in every other night and SOPHIA would tuck her in

the other nights. But after we decided our relationship was over and SOPHIA was drinking

more, and starting to drink earlier in the evening, then SOPHIA did less with ABIGAL. By the

time SOPHIA actually moved out she was drinking almost every night. So then I was feeding

ABIGAL, giving her a bath, and tucking her in almost every night because SOPHIA was

drinking. I love caring for ABIGAL so I do not in any way resent the time I have spent

nurturing her and providing for her daily needs but I am concerned about ABIGAL being alone

in SOPHIA’S care while she is drinking.

When SOPHIA moved out I was concerned that she would be drinking that would lead

to her being violent and not caring for ABIGAL. SOPHIA and I agreed in writing that

neither of us would drink during the time she or I was caring for ABIGAL. But SOPHIA

did not follow that agreement.

SOPHIA moved into her friend ANNIE RICE’S home when she left the home we

formerly shared. ANNIE was a close friend of SOPHIA during our relationship and I was not a

very close friend with her at all. But within one week of SOPHIA leaving our home ANNIE

contacted me and told me that SOPHIA was drinking and unfit to care for ABIGAL.

Incorporated herein by this reference is the Declaration of ANNIE RICE explaining the

continued serious drinking by SOPHIA after she left our home. ANNIE RICE told SOPHIA

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 4 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-1 0 0 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 32: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

she had to leave because she could not have SOPHIA in her home drinking and lying.

SOPIA then moved into a home with another friend. So SOPHIA and ABIGAL are now living

out of a suitcase and I have no assurance that SOPHIA will not be drinking around ABIGAL.

I am very concerned about SOPHIA’S home situation and that ABIGAL will not be cared for

while SOPHIA is drinking.

I am also concerned because SOPHIA is in a relationship with SCOTT RICHARD

FOMBY (DOB 07/16/1979) again. SCOTT has a serious criminal history including burglary,

residential burglary and robbery as well as many misdemeanors and infractions. ABIGAL

should have not contact with SCOTT FOMBY.

Since we made the decision to end our relationship SOPHIA has also been broking

marijuana deals between friends. She will get cash from a friend, then go buy the marijuana

from another friend, and bring the marijuana back to the first friend. I have personally

observed this. SOPHIA’S marijuana brokering has only been going on since we decided to

separate. I am concerned that SOPHIA may also be using marijuana and that is part of why

she has been drinking so much more lately. In general her judgment has seemed much more

impaired over the last few months and the decisions she is making are not good ones for

SOPHIA or ABIGAL.

I am proposing that SOPHIA be required to take random, weekly UAs which test for

alcohol consumption and pot. So long as SOPHIA is getting clean UAs she should be

allowed unsupervised visitation with ABIGAL. We just signed an agreement that SOPHIA

would not drink with ABIGAL and she turned around and immediately started drinking with

ABIGAL, I believe there needs to be a period of clean random UAs. Also, she was kicked out

of the first home moved into within a week and now she is living out of a suitcase at another

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH ■ Page 5 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5 9 2 0 -100th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 33: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

friend’s house, so she needs to establish a solid residence. But if SOPHIA has three

consecutive months of clean weekly UAs, and if SOPHIA has established a residence suitable

for ABIGAL then I would not be opposed to a 50/50 equally shared residential schedule.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE

OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed at (city) __________ , (state) /< M on (date) & / f Z

NATHAN LENSCH

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 6 of 6 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 34: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1+A

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3-03127*0 43086283 TPROTSC 08-13-14

IN COUNTY ctlftK’s OFFICE

AM. AUG 12 2014 PM.KEVIN STOP*' jyASHWGTONBY N 5T0CK- County Clerk

------------ --------—. DEPUTEa

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), Ex Parte Restraining Order/OrderNATHAN E. LENSCH, To Show Cause

AndPetitioner, (Parentage)

(TPROTSC/ORTSC)

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

[ ] Clerk’s Action Required [ ] Law Enforcement Notification, 1} 4.1

Restraining Order Summary:

Restraining Order Summary is set forth below:

Name of person(s) restrained: NATHAN LENSCH AND SOPHIA RUTSCHOW Name of person(s) protected: NATHAN LENSCH. SOPHIA RUTSCHOW AND ABIGAIL LENSCH. See paragraph 4.1.____________________________________________

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 4.1 below with actual knowledge of its terms is a criminal offense under Chapter 26.50 RCW and will subject the violator to arrest RCW 26.26.590.

I. Show Cause Order

It is ordered that (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW appear and show cause, if any, why the restraints below should not be continued in full force and effect pending final determination of this action and why the other relief, if any, requested in the motion should not be granted. A hearing has been set for the following date, time and place:

rO ^Date: SEPTEMBERS. 2014 fifiP Time: 9:00a.m._____________

Place: PIERCE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT_______ Room/Department: TBD

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 1 of 4 FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEYWPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060 & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order.doc Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 35: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

If you disagree with any part of the motion, you must respond to the motion in writing before the hearing and by the deadline for your county. At the hearing, the court will consider Written sworn affidavits or declarations. Oral testimony may Not be allowed. To respond you must: (1) file your documents with the court; (2) provide a copy of those documents to the judge or commissioner’s staff; (3) serve the other party’s attorney with copies of your documents (or have the other party served if that party does not have an attorney); and (4) complete your filing and service of documents within the time period required by the local court rules in effect in your county. If you need more information, you are advised to consult an attorney or a courthouse facilitator.

Failure to appear may result in a Temporary Order being entered by the court which grants the relief requested in the motion without further notice.

II. Basis

A motion for a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW or that party’s lawyer has been made to this court.

III. Findings

The court adopts paragraphs 2.1,2.2, and 2.4 of the Motion/Declaration for an Ex Parte Restraining Order and for an Order to Show Cause (Form WPF PS 04.0150) as its findings, except as follows:

It is Ordered:IV. Order

4.1 Restraining Order

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 4.1 with actual notice of its terms is a criminal offense under Chapter 26.50 RCW and will subject the violator to arrest RCW 26.26.590.BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from disturbing the peace of THE OTHER PARTY or of any child.

ServiceThe requesting party must arrange for service of this order on the restrained party. File the original Return of Service with the clerk and provide a copy to the law enforcement agency listed above.

Full Faith and CreditPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2265, a court in any of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any United States territory, and any tribal land within the United States shall accord full faith and credit to the order.

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 2 of 4 FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEYWPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060 & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order.doc Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 36: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from removing any of the children from the state of Washington.

The child, ABIGAL LENSCH shall reside with IStATI lAhm.NUCt'l until‘-rnriiij <2 l l Lf / d O / L / . m T V / S S O & /7 & 2 s a &u c g e s e g t s / f M J S E P

f iU G /s y /j-O /V A7~ C? ;c 0 /ts r ) . 77/£ /8/97XjeAJHC

AS S A j'f// £6<£/<V20/svKr

N £ /7 7 /£ 6 - P f ln r t SJ-MCC fi/3 A /S U m f A tc a /M L 0 /*- . „ btLO<S$

A/D N - reasa?1rt£<D ryfvr _________________________________

4.2 Other Restraining Order

Both parties shall submit to an ETG (alcohol) and six-panel drug UA test today before close of business at Crossroads Treatment Center at 10828 Gravelly Lake Dr SW, Lakewood, WA 98499. Each party setup and submit lu idinJum UAtesting at Ipa^t nnce wnnlrly f r t ^ .xn falrnhnl) I IA hntufnnn nnm nnH thr> h i ringdate pot forth above.

Neither parent allow the child to have any contact with SCOTT FOMBY.

4.3 Surrender of Deadly Weapons

Does not apply.

4.4 Expiration Date

This order shall expire on the hearing date set forth above or 14 days from the date of issuance, whichever is sooner, unless otherwise extended by the court.

4.5 Waiver of Bond

Does not apply.

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 3 of 4WPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 37: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4.6 Other

Dated: AUG 1 2 2014 at

Presented by:FAUBION, REEDER, FgALEY & COOK, P.S.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

Ju«-./C ommls„ o . . r KAB B W B B W K jaCopy received: COURT COMMISSIONS]A signature below is actual notice of this order

*Sophia»Rutschow, Respondent Pro se

'N C°UNTy cl| rk.s ofrce

A M AUB 1220H p

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 4 of 4WPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW 26.09.060 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 38: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Cause Number: 14-3-03127-0 Memorandum of Journal Entry

Judge/Commissioner: KARENA K. KIRKENDOLL Court Reporter: Smart Court Judicial Assistant: Chelsea Glanz

LENSCH, NATHAN E. Daniel N Cook Attorney for Plaintiff/PetitionerRUTSCHOW, SOPHIA LENSCH, ABIGAIL

Proceeding Set: Exparte Action Proceeding Outcome: Held Resolution:

Proceeding Date: Aug 12, 2014 2:32 PM

Clerk's Code: MTHRGProceeding Outcome code: HELD

Resolution Outcome code: Amended Resolucton code:

NATHAN E. LENSCH

Petitioner(s)vs

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Respondent(s)

Memornadum of Journal Entry.Paufil of 2

Page 39: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

NATHAN E. LENSCH Cause Number: 14-3-03127-0 Memorandum of Journal Entryvs

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Judge/Commissioner: KARENA K. KIRKENDOLL

-■t■T

MINUTES OF PROCEEDING

Start Date/Time: Aug 12, 2014 2:32 PM Judicial Assistant: Chelsea Glanz

Court Reporter: Smart Court

August 12, 2014 02:32 PM -

to Attorney Daniel Cook comes before the Court seeking an Ex Parte Restraining Order,y Petitioner Nathan Lensch and Respondent Sophia Rutschow is also present. JIS reviewed. Botho) parties are to obtain a UA. Court continues this matter to Thursday August 14, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

Court is at recess on this matter.

02:51 p.m. Back on the record. Court signs Order.

End Date/Time: Aug 12, 2014 2:52 PM

Memornadum of Journal Entry.Pape2 of 2

Page 40: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

August 13 2014 11:49 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

Superior Court of Washington County of PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),

NATHAN E. LENSCH,Petitioner,

No. 3 * 0 3 / °

Return of Service (Optional Use)(RTS)

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I Declare:

1. lam over the age of 18 years, and I am not a party to this action.

2. I served the following documents to (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW:

o Petition for Parenting Plan and Child Support o Summonso Order Setting Case Schedule o Notice re Military Dependent o Proposed Parenting Plan o Motion for Ex Parte Restraining Order o Ex Parte Restraining Order entered August 12, 2014 o Dec of Annie Rice o Dec of Nathan Lensch o Note for CC on Sept 8

Return of Service (RTS) - Page 1 of 2WPF DRPSCU 01.0250 (07/2013) - CR 4(g), RCW4.28.080(15)S: \CASES1 \Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Return o f Service, doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 41: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3. The date, time and place of service were (if by mail refer to Paragraph 4 below):

Date: ___ Time: <2- OQ____________ arm

Address: T fiffQ rtfA / V _______________

___________ T / d € a & A / / ? 9 8 Z -

4. Service was made:

by delivery to the person named in paragraph 2 above

5 Service of Notice on Dependent of a Person in Military Service.

□ The Notice to Dependent of Person in Military Service was □ served on □ mailed by first class mail on (date)___________________________ .

6. Other:

Does not apply.

the state of Washington that the

on

' Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of foregoing is true and correct.

Signed at (city) / (state)

c

Return of Service (RTS) - Page 2 of 2WPF DRPSCU 01.0250 (07/2013) - CR 4(g), RCW4.28.080(15)S: \CASES1 \Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Return o f Service, doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 42: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

>..

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING

August 14 2014 2:16 PM

___KEVIN STOCKCOUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

c

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH, < •

Child(ren), Cover Page for VisitationNATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,Supervisor Contract

And

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

Cover Page for Visitation Supervisor Contract - Page 1 of 3Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Cover page for supervisor contract.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 43: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Visitation* Supervision Contract

1 .1 understand my obligations under this contract are to the Superior Court of Washington for Pierce County and not to either parent or any other person. I further understand that I am a volunteer and not a party to the legal action between these two parents and that I am free to discontinue providing visitation supervision services at any time. I agree, however, that if I choose to provide supervision, I will do so in accordance with this contract.

2 .1 understand I must fulfill my obligations under this contract regardless of my personal feelings about either parent or any other person and regardless of my personal opinion of any allegations made by either parent against the other.

3 .1 will remain physically close enough during the entire visitation so I can prevent physical harm to the child(ren) and so that I can hear any conversations between the person I am supervising and the child(ren) I am protecting. I understand this does not mean that I have to always be in the same room with the person I am supervising with the child, but I should remain close enough to be within earshot and I should not be engaged in other activities which prevent me from monitoring the visit the person I am supervising is having with the child(ren).

4 .1 understand there cannot be discussions o f or references to the legal action between the parents, the pending dissolution, the legal issues in this case, the allegations made by either parent or any other similar matter during the visitation. Should the person I am supervising initiate or participate in any such discussion or reference, I will terminate the visitation. Should the child(ren) initiate any such discussion or reference, I will act promptly to change the subject if the parent I am supervising does not do so.

5 .1 understand there can be no consumption of drugs or alcohol o f any kind during visitation. I further understand if I have any concerns whatsoever that the person I am supervising has recently consumed drugs or alcohol based on his or her appearance, actions, words, smell, etc., the visitation should not take place or should be terminated. I will act promptly to do so if I have any concerns.

6 .1 understand there should be no expressions o f anger or physical discipline of the child(ren) during the visitation. I will terminate the visitation if the person I am supervising acts inappropriately.

7 .1 understand the activities to be scheduled during the visitation should be reasonable and take into account my need to be physically close to the child(ren) and the parent I am supervising. I understand I can change or veto any plans made by the person I am supervising at my discretion.

8. If a child is injured or becomes ill or agitated during a visitation or if, for any other reason, I believe the visitation should not continue, the visitation will be terminated immediately.

9 .1 will report to the Other Parent, or Other Parent’s attorney if I take any action to terminate a visitation under this contract.

Page 44: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

10 .1 am a volunteer and will provide supervision services as long as I wish to do so. I expect the parents and their counsel to treat me with respect and understand that my time is valuable. I expect notice in advance of visits that the parents wish me to supervise and I understand that I am not obligated to provide supervision services on a particular day or time merely because the parents schedule one for that day or time. I expect counsel to provide me with copies of relevant court orders. I expect counsel and the parents not to make requests of me that are inconsistent with existing court orders or this contract. I expect the parents to promptly fulfill my requests made under this contract.

11. If I decide at any time I no longer wish to provide supervision as described in this contract, I will notify the Father’s counsel. If I decide to do so during a visitation, I will terminate the visitation and return the children) to the other parent.

1 2 .1 understand a communication by one counsel to me or me to one counsel does not mean that the other counsel is aware o f the communication. Therefore I ask that, as much as possible, communications be made in writing so that I am not used as a message carrier and so there can be clarity regarding the visitations.

I HAVE READ THE CONTRACT ABOVE. I UNDERSTAND THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE VISITATION SUPERVISOR AND I WILL ACT ACCORDINGLY. *

*This contract uses the term “visitation” to describe the time that the non-primary residential parent spends with the child(ren). This is because the supervisor is a lay person and not an attorney. It is intended to ensure clarity in the contract by using the term that most lay people are most familiar with.

Page 45: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN COUNTy S U R k'S office

a .m . AUG 1 4 2GJ4 P M

KFVpN STOTK WASHIN6T0N t=viN bTOCK, County Clerk---------^ '.DEPUTY

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), Ex Parte Restraining Order/OrderNATHAN E. LENSCH, To Show Cause

AndPetitioner, (Parentage)

(TPROTSC/ORTSC)

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

[ ] Clerk’s Action Required [ ] Law Enforcement Notification, U 4.1

Restraining Order Summary:

Restraining Order Summary is set forth below:

Name of person(s) restrained: NATHAN LENSCH AND SOPHIA RUTSCHOW Name of person(s) protected: NATHAN LENSCH. SOPHIA RUTSCHOW AND ABIGAIL LENSCH. See paragraph 4.1.___________________________________________

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 4.1 below with actual knowledge of its terms is a criminal offense under Chapter 26.50 RCW and will subject the violator to arrest RCW 26.26.590.

I. Show Cause Order

It is ordered that (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW appear,and show cause, if any, why the restraints below should not be continued in full force and effect pending final determination of this action and why the other relief, if any, requested in the motion should not be granted. A hearing has been set for the following date, time and place:

/ Date: SEPTEMBER 8. 2014 Time: 9:00 a.m.____________

Place: PIERCE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT_______Room/Department: TBD

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 1 of 3WPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW26.09.060 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order 2.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 46: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

'V

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

If you disagree with any part of the motion, you must respond to the motion in writing before the hearing and by the deadline for your county. At the hearing, the court will consider Written sworn affidavits or declarations. Oral testimony may Not be allowed. To respond you must: (1) file your documents with the court; (2) provide a copy of those documents to the judge or commissioner’s staff; (3) serve the other party’s attorney with copies of your documents (or have the other party served if that party does not have an attorney); and (4) complete your filing and service of documents within the time period required by the local court rules in effect in your county. If you need more information, you are advised to consult an attorney or a courthouse facilitator.

Failure to appear may resuit in a Temporary Order being entered by the court which grants the relief requested in the motion without further notice.

II. Basis

A motion for a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to (name) SOPHIA RUTSCHOW or that party’s lawyer has been made to this court.

III. Findings

The court adopts paragraphs 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4 of the Motion/Declaration for an Ex Parte Restraining Order and for an Order to Show Cause (Form WPF PS 04.0150) as its findings, except as follows:

It is Ordered:IV. Order

4,1 Restraining Order

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 4.1 with actual notice of its terms is a criminal offense under Chapter 26.50 RCW and will subject the violator to arrest RCW26.26.590.BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from disturbing the peace of THE OTHER PARTY or of any child.

ServiceThe requesting party must arrange for service of this order on the restrained party. File the original Return of Service with the clerk and provide a copy to the law enforcement agency listed above.

Full Faith and CreditPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2265, a court in any of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any United States territory, and any tribal land within the United States shall accord full faith and credit to the order.

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 2 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEYWPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW26.09.060 , & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pteadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order 2.doc Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 47: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

■*. *

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4.2 Other Restraining Order

BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from removing any of the children from the state of Washington.

4.3

4.4

The child, ABIGAL LENSCH shall reside with NATHAN LENSCH until the hearing date set forth above. U f dpi^ 0 4 0 . L & ltc A u / i f i i /? /& /. / N /> # & *& A 0 tt- a f-jc t?Each party set up and submit to random UA resting at least once weekly at /? Crossroads Treatment Center at 10828 Gravelly Lake Dr SW, Lakewood, WA 98499, for ETG (alcohol) UA between now and the hearing date set forth above. > y

. .. - 6 HDZT 7D /?£Z/SiJ£0 /f^ y>/ho ts £ > £ /,ifjz /s S /S /*~ *Neither parent allow the child to have any contact with SCOTT FOMBY.^^.

f t l t P U * ' f t f o * - L c k t / J <7?n

/ W > . / 0 - f a O / 'n J - -O K l / ’- W ( F M & C

t r h u 'f'/d ju s - < S 7 3 0 ^ A t - O OT P O / d l y F T h u s r fM u u

N £iTH £& fA & T 7 TVEMS_ N £ i.rx £ £ _ t v b /s e u s s tm £ c a m rSurrender of Deadly Weapons^ , ^ S U s r e ^ o m a

p. , . fF m o mDoes not apply. ^

Expiration Date ^

4.6

This order shall expire on the hearing date set forth above or 14 days from the date of issuance, whichever is sooner, unless otherwise extended byj^e^jK|rt.FiLcD

HTY CLERK'S 0!4.5 Waiver of Bond

a m . AUG 1 4 2(m

Does not apply. _ . ^ ^ stockco^

Other A j J d ^ ^

/ /u r /L * . / - * * £ * - <) O t^ ^Does not apply.

Dated: At/G 1 4 2flfet^ ^ ^ ajg)p.m. Commissioner

Presented by: EAbBtONrREE rPRAtEY & COOK, P.S.

KARENA KIRKENDOL- Copy received: COURT COMMISSION^A signature below is actual notice of this order

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866" Attorney foj^etitiqrier

M uophip RutsSophip Rutschow, Respondent

Pro se

*0

Ex Parte Restraining Ord (TPROTSC/ORTSC) - Page 3 of 3WPF DR 04.0170 Mandatory (6/2008) - CR 65 (b); RCW26.09.060 Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Ex Parte Restraining Order2.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 48: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

NATHAN E LENSCH Cause Number: 14-3-03127-0

Petitioner(s) Memorandum of Journal Entry

vs

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Respondent(s)Judge/Commissioner: KARENA K. KIRKENDOLL Court Reporter: Smart Court Judicial Assistant: Chelsea Glanz

LENSCH, NATHAN E Daniel N Cook RUTSCHOW, SOPHIA LENSCH, ABIGAIL

Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Proceeding Set: Ex Parte Action-Return HearingProceeding Outcome: HeldResolution:

Proceeding Date: Aug 14, 2014 9:07 AM

Clerk’s Code: MTHRGProceeding Outcome code: HELD

Resolution Outcome code:

Amended Resolucton code:

M e m o r n a d u m o f J o u r n a l E n t r y .

P flpe l n f 2

Page 49: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

NATHAN E LENSCHvs

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

MINUTES OF PROCEEDING

Cause Number: 14-3-03127-0 Memorandum of Journal Entry

Judge/Commissioner: KARENA K. KIRKENDOLL

Start Date/Time: Aug 14, 2014 9:08 AM Judicial Assistant: Chelsea Glanz

Court Reporter: Smart Court

August 14, 2014 09:07 AM -

Attorney Daniel Cook comes before the Court for a return hearing seeking an Ex Parte Restraining Order. JIS reviewed. Child shall reside with the father with the supervision of the paternal grandmother. Mother’s visitation shall take place as laid out in this Order. Court is at recess on this matter.

09:35 a.m. Back on the record. Court signs Order.

End Date/Time: Aug 14, 2014 9:36 AM

Memornadum of Journal Entry.Pnue:2 o f 7

Page 50: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

03127-0 43133615 CP 00-19-14

a m , AUG 18 20M p.m.

m

A

IN COUNTYcfclSRK'6 OFFICE

s fflM S & S S l-C'HPjn

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF PIERCE

NATHAN E LENSCH,

Petitioner(s) ,

vs.

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Cause No. 14-3-03127-0

RESULTS

Respondent(s) .

Page 51: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Ayg. 18. 2014 9 : 26AM No. 1659 P. 1/2

f

a)ffl *

O

CROSSROADS TREATMENT ENTERChemical Dependency Intensive Outpatient Treatment

Deferred Prosecution ♦ Relapse Therapy Outpatient Substance Abuse Services

Alcohol Ding Information School

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW; Suite 204 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 473-7474 Fax: (253) 474-9724

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET

To: Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization: Date:8-18-14

F ax Number:2 ^ 3 - i Q g - I Z W

Total Pages: 2

Re: SophiaRitschow DOB: 03-31-81 Cause# 14-3-03127-0

1 -For-Review—— T2Uo ca P adi tn 1 1 Til ca_.U-.aw1x/--------- L_j-.ui'gern ... . T ILuoL- ' -■ | - • | -X IvUoV' vVvpijy ’ ...........

Notes/Comments: UA Results

7777777777 CONFIDENTIAL 171717/27This Information has been disclosed to you front records whose confidentiality' is protected by Federal Law, Federal regulations prohibit you

front making any further disclosure o f It without the specific written consent o f the person to whom it pertains or os otherwise permitted by such regulation. A general authorization for the release o f medical Information Is not sufficient fo r this purpose. This information is intended only fo r the individual^) named above. 1 / the render o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver It to the recipient is not the intended recipient, you ore hereby notified (hat any dissemination o f this information is prohibited. I f yon have received this communication in error, ptease notify us by telephone and return the original message via the U.S. Postal Sendee and we will reimburse you fo r any expenses incurred.

Page 52: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 1659 P. 2/2V * \ Aug. 18. 2014 9 :26AM

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Patient RUTSCHOW, SOPHIA

Collected 6/12/2014 00:00 Received 8/14/2014 Reported 8/15/2014

K) ----------------------------------------------------

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma. WA 9S421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

Specimen ID 102829918

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369381

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB

1 vTest Name Result Quantitation Screon Limit Confirmation Limit

AMP H er AMINES Negative 1000 ng/mLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mL

■-tCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ng/mLETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dl

■' * OPIATES Negative 300 ngAnLL_J(Xj

MARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/mL

SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGiTf CREATININE Normal 53.2mg/dL > 20 mg/dLrri NITRITE Negative 500 mcgAnL

pH Normal 7.2 4.5 - 6,9

*~0

1

i

Final ReportFFjdEy jgusH5 Q :25;55 AM

300J .0.0.33

Page 53: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 1660 P. 1/2Aug. 18. 20 1 4 9 :22AM

CROSSROADS TREATMENT ENTERChemical Dependency Intensive Outpatient Treatment

Deferred Prosecution ♦ Relapse Therapy Outpatient Substance Abuse Services

Alcohol Drug Information School

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW, Suite 204 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 473-7474 Fax: (253) 474-9724

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET

To; Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization: Date;8-18-14

Fax Number; v _ ~A S 3 - m - 7 7 . m

Total Pages: 2

Re; NathanLensch DOB: 09-19-78 Cause# 14-3-03127-0

......... [ ] Urgent / <' For Review HJ' Please Comment'. " |_J“ Please'Reply'

Notes/Comments: UA Results

*

unarm c o n f id e n t ia l rm armThis information has been disclosed to yon from records whose confidentiality is protected by Federal Law. Federal regulations prohibit you

front making any further disclosure o f It without the specific written consent o f the person to whom it pertains or as othenvise permitted by such regulation. A general authorization fo r (he release o f Medical information Is noi sufficient fo r this purpose. This information Is intended only for the Individual^) named above. I f the reader o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver It to the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination o f this information Is prohibited. I f yon have recth ed this communication in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message via the V.S. Postal Service and we wiii reimburse yon fo r any expenses incurred

Page 54: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Aug, 18. 2014 9 :27AM No. 1660 P. 2 /2

U

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name C R O S S R O A D S TR TM T C E N TE R

Patient LENSCH, NATHANCollected 8/12/2014 00:00

f'J Received 8/14/2014?{) Reported 8/16/2014LfiA f " ~ . __ 1~. ^

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma, WA 98421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

Specimen ID 102829917

External ID Patient ID

Specimen Matrix Patient SSN Patient DOB

N/ASR L1369380Urine

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation Limit

4AMPHETAMINES Negative 1000 ng/mLb e n z o d ia z e p in e s Negative 200 ng/mL

vH COCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ngAnL!, i

ETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) PO SITIVE 500 ngAnLOJ ETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dL\ OPIATES Negative 300 ngAnLiTi MARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/mL

S P E C IM E N V A L ID ITY TESTING

a) CREATININE Normal 50.5 mg/dL > 20 mg/dLNITRITEpH

Negative'Normal S.2

* 500'fttt$/tnL 4.5 - 8.9

Comments_________.____________________ ___________ __________ _______________ ______-Ethyl Glucuronlde Screen: All positive screening test results and sem (-quantitative values obtained (rom a screening test result should be

"considered presumptive'until confirmed with a spec(tie and sensitive alternate method such-as GG/MS or-LC/MS/MS.-------------------------------

Certification_____Co rl Ifle d Tr ue an d Comp le te

BRANDON STICKELMEYER. MS CERTIFYING SCIENTIST

(Signed out 8/16/2014)

E N T E B E D AUG 1 820W

Final ReportSaturday, August 18.2014 £20:1 a am

3004,0.0.13

Page 55: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGT

August 27 2014 10:08 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,And

No. 14-3-03127-0

DECLARATION OF MAILING

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I, Sally DuCharme, am over the age of 18, and competent to testify in the above entitled case.

On August 27, 2014, I placed in the U.S. Mail a copy of the following documents in the above-entitled caption:

1. Sealed Personal Healthcare Records;2. Ex Parte Restraining Order entered on August 14, 2014; and3. Visitation Supervisor Contract.

Said documents were addressed to:

Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498

I declare, under the penalty of perjury and the Laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED August 27, 2014V 'to y A / --<■

- Sally DuSforme, Legal Assistant

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Mailing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 56: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

September 04 2014 4:13 pM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTONCOUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,

No. 14-3-03127-0

DECLARATION OF JANE LENSCH

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,R e s p o n d e n t.________________________________

I, JANE LENSCH, make the following statement on the basis of my personal

knowledge.

I am the Petitioner’s mother and the minor child’s, ABBY’S, grandmother. I live in

California but flew to Washington to care for ABBY this past summer after we learned from

ABBY’S school that she had 20 absences and 17 late starts during the school year. When I

confronted SOPHIA about this in the hallway of the courthouse following our hearing in

August, SOPHIA gave me her middle finger in the courtroom hallway.

My son, NATHAN, ABBY’S father, picked up ABBY after the hearing from a home

where SOPHIA was renting a room. SOPHIA had words with NATHAN I could not hear.

Before releasing ABBY to us, SOPHIA grasped ABBY, who is six years old, and said, “if

DECLARATION OF JANE LENSCH - Page 1 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Jane Lensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 -100 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 57: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Daddy or Grandma hurts you, you call me.” This is absurd that NATHAN or I would ever hurt

ABBY, and to put this idea in a child’s head is to alarm ABBY needlessly.

On August 17, a Sunday, SOPHIA came to pick up ABBY for visitation. While ABBY

waited in the car, SOPHIA proceeded to have an 8 minute discussion with NATHAN. I had to

ask SOPHIA to please start her visitation with her child since there was a restraining order in

place prohibiting contact between NATHAN and her. SOPHIA called me a “b*tch” and stated

that I was controlling. When SOPHIA later dropped off ABBY, the exchange was difficult

again. SOPHIA returned ABBY early and had presents from a yard sale that ABBY wanted to

give me. SOPHIA said goodbye to ABBY and then began to rant at NATHAN. She stated

she would not use her lower income for reduced meals at ABBY’S school. NATHAN did not

respond to SOPHIA’S rants and intimidations. I had to take ABBY into the house crying, and

then SOPHIA demanded 15 more minutes of visitation since it was only 5:45. This whole

scene again violated the restraining order and needlessly distressed ABBY.

On August 18, SOPHIA showed up at the Lakewood YMCA where ABBY was enrolled

in gymnastics. SOPHIA again approached NATHAN, in violation of the restraining order, and

began a discussion about child care and what she demanded she should have control of. I

reminded her again that she was in violation of the restraining order, but she ignored me.

On August 19, NATHAN and I were interviewed by CPS investigator Ross Hiranaga

because CPS has received an anonymous report that ABBY had bruising. No bruises were

observed on Mr. Hiranaga’s examination of ABBY. I had bathed ABBY each and every night

since August 13 and had never seen any evidence of bruising or abuse on ABBY. Mr.

Hiranaga came again to NATHAN’S home on August 21 and looked at a broken window in the

bedroom caused by vandalism. He noted that ABBY did have a nickel-sized bruise below her

DECLARATION OF JANE LENSCH - Page 2 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\DeclarationofJaneLensch.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920- 100th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 58: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2014 01:35 PM PAGE.

right knee that would be consistent with gymnastics or several visits to the park.

At her visitation exchange on August 19, SOPHIA again confronted NATHAN in

violation of the restraining order, I kept ABBY in the kitchen so she would not hear the

discuSsibn. I could hear that SOPHIA was demanding her terms for the future, but NATHAN

did not raise his voice and remained calm.

I am hopeful that with a court order in place, ABBY will have a better life, with before

and afte • school care, better attendance at school, and, I sincerely hope, a mother who is

sober and will nurture her. She is a very bright and inventive little girl, and I am very proud of

my son NATHAN’S efforts to give ABBY a better life

! I pECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE; i

OF WjA$HINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Sianed^t (citv) , (state)^^ on (date) q <± i d .

j a n e TTe n s c h "

DECLARATION OF JANE LENSCH - Page 3 of 3S:\CASBS1\Lansch\DRAFTS\PleBctings\Dedeirgtion ofJene L6n$tfictoc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEYS COOK, P.S, 5920 — 100,h St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 59: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of:ABIGAIL LENSCH, No. 14-3-03127-0

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH, DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GR

Petitioner, 17and

(FILING OF FAX SIGNATURE)SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent,

I, Sally DuCharme, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State

of Washington that the following is true to the best of my knowledge.

I am the person responsible for filing of the fax signature page of the

DECLARATION OF JANE LENSCH.

I have examined the document and determined that it consists of 4 pages,

including this declaration page (but not including attachments), and is a complete and

legible image that I have examined personally and that was received by me via FAX

TRANSMISSION at (253) 581-0660.

Signed at Lakewood, WA on September 4, 2014.

Sally DuChamie, Legal AssistantDeclaration Pursuant to GR 17 - Page 1 of 1 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration re Faxed Signature.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 60: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING!

September 08 2014 9:14 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,And

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent,

No. 14-3-03127-0

DECLARATION OF MAILING

I, Sally DuCharme, am over the age of 18, and competent to testify in the above entitled case.

On September 5, 2014, I placed in the U.S. Mail a copy of the following documents in the above-entitled caption:

1. Sealed Personal Healthcare Records;2. Declaration of Jane Lensch; and3. Sealed Confidential Reports.

Said documents were addressed to:

Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498

I declare, under the penalty of perjury and the Laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED September 5,2014 - t

■ 'Saify’Di^armeTLegal Assistant

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Mailing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 61: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

September 08 2014 10:21 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY

NATHAN E LENSCH

Petitioner(s),

vs.

No. 14-3-03127-0

NOTE FOR COMMISSIONER'S CALENDAR

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Respondent(s)

TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND TO:

Name: SOPHIA RUTSCHOW Phone:Address: . ., WA Respondent

Please take notice that an issue of law in this case will be heard on the date and time shown below:

Pierce County Superior Court, County-City Building - 930 Tacoma Ave S - Tacoma, WA 98402

Motion - Temporary Order Calendar: Show Cause/Family Law

CALENDAR DATE: Wednesday, October 01,2014 9:00 AM

WORKING COPIES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO COMMISSIONERS SERVICES ROOM 140, BEFORE 12:00 NOON TWO COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING

DATED: September 8, 2014.

NAME: Daniel N Cook

ADDRESS: 5920 100th St SW Ste 25LAKEWOOD, WA 98499-2751

Signed: /s/ Daniel N Cook

Phone: (253) 581-0660

WSBA#: 34866For: Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Note for Commissioners Calendar (ntc.rptdesign) 1 of 1

Page 62: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0 43247911 RSP 09-09-14 | COUNTY 'Ct^K'SOPPieE

l M SEP 05 i mP.M.

Superior Court of Washington County of Pierce

In re the Parenting and Support of:Abigail Lensch No. 14-3-03127-0

Nathan Lensch

Child(ren), Response to Petition for Residential Schedule/

Petitioner, Parenting Planand Child Support

(RSP)Sophia Rutschow Check box if petition is attached for:

Respondent. [ ] Order for protection DV (PTORPRT) [ ] Order for protection UH (PTORAH)

1. The allegations of the petition in this matter are admitted or denied as follows (check only one box for each paragraph):

Paragraph of the Petition

1.1 Cause of Action[ ] Admitted [ ] Denied [ x] Lacks Information

1.2 Paternity Acknowledgment and Denial of Paternity[x ] Admitted [ ] Denied [ ] Lacks Information

1.3 Order Establishing Parentage[ ] Admitted [] Denied [x] Lacks Information

1.4 Jurisdiction[x ] Admitted [] Denied [] Lacks Information

1.5 Period for Challenge to the Acknowledgment or Denial of Paternity[x ] Admitted [] Denied [] Lacks Information

1.6 Jurisdiction Over the Childf x] Admitted [] Denied [] Lacks Information

Resp to Pet Res Sched Parenting Plan (RSP) - Page 1 of 3WPF PS 15.0300 Mandatory (07/2011) - R CW 26.26.130(7)(b)r .375

Page 63: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1.7 Child Support[ ] Admitted [x]

1.8 Residential Placement[ ] Admitted [x]

1.9 Reimbursement[ ] Admitted [X]

1.10 Continuing Restraining Order[ ] Admitted []

1.11 Protection Order[ ] Admitted []

1.12 Other[ ] Admitted []

Denied [] Lacks Information

Denied [] Lacks Information

Denied [] Lacks Information

Denied [x] Lacks Information

Denied [x] Lacks Information

Denied [X] Lacks Information

Each allegation of the petition which is denied is denied for the following reasons (list separately):

Re: 1.1Abigail Lensch is only residing with Nathan Lensch temporarily until our next court

appearance. I was unaware that I had to file my documents with the court clerk and provide Dan Cook with a copy of them at/before our last court date.

Re: 1.7

I believe I should not be required to pay child support at this time; Nathan only has temporary custody of our daughter. I believe the judge granted him the temporary custody because his Mother was here visiting and was able to care for Abigail and the judge did not have any information to base her decision on other than what Nathan submitted.

Re: 1.8

It is in the child’s best interest to reside with me. I’ve been the stay at home parent her entire life until 2 months ago when I became employed. I feel as though my daughter was ripped away from me because Nathan has only told a partial truth. I am living in a stable, loving, family oriented home. Abby has 3 other girls, her age, to play with at my home and it’s a structured positive environment. Also Abby would only require after school child care for 2.5 hours at the most, the childcare would take place at Park Lodge via the YMCA of Lakewood, and she would not have to ride the bus to and from. I only work part time so I am able to provide her transportation to and from school. Obviously I would take care of my daughter before school and after work. I have a lot of long time local friends who are more than willing to be supportive and help in any possible way.

Nathan Lensch is an abusive alcoholic and also suffers from untreated Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Nathan Lensch does not have any local friends or family to count on for support. His work schedule requires our daughter to be in daycare before and after school. Nathan and I never wanted Abby to be cared for by strangers let alone in commercial daycare. I would like Nathan to only have weekend visits with our daughter until he seeks professional treatment for his alcoholism and Post traumatic stress

Resp to Pet Res Sched Parenting Plan (RSP) - Page 2 o f 3WPF PS 15.0300 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 64: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

disorder. He self medicates and has a bad temper. I am worried about the welfare of my daughter after his mother leaves, which is tomorrow, August 24, 2014.

2. Request for Relief

The court should enter respondent’s proposed parenting plan [x ] attached [ ] filed in this case.

The court should enter a continuing restraining order.

The court should approve a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) for our daughter.

The court should restrain Nathan Lensch from having our daughter around Mrs. Rice and her family.

The court should Subpoena Annie Rice to testify on my behalf because she knows pertinent details regarding the relationship Nathan and I shared.

3. Notice of Further Proceedings

Notice of all further proceedings in this matter should be sent to the respondent in care of the following service address: (you may list an address that is not your residential address where you agree to accept legal documents.)

9117 70th St. SW Lakewood. WA 98498__________________________

Any time this address changes while this action is pending, you must notify the opposing parties in writing and file an updated Confidential Information Form (WPF DRPSCU 09.0200) with the court clerk.

4. Other

[x ] A copy of the child’s birth certificate or the Paternity Acknowledgment is filed with this response, under the Sealed Acknowledgment/Denial of Patemity/Birth Certificate Cover Sheet, form WPF PS 15.0150, because it was not filed with the court.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the statement above is true and correct.

Signed at Lakewood, WA

Resp to Pet Res Sched Parenting Plan (RSP) - Page 3 o f 3WPF PS 15.0300 Mandatory (07/2011) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 65: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN COUNTY Cl I r k 'S OFFICE

AM SEP 05 2m p m .

S s t S ' MWINGTONB Y ^ J i y ^ T Ja u n ty Clerk f ------^ deputy

Superior Court of Washington County of

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0Abigail Lensch

Child(ren),Petition for

[x ] Residential Schedule/Sophia Rutschow

Petitioner,Parenting Plan

and [x ] Child Support (PT)

Nathan LenschRespondent.

Use this form to ask for a Parenting Plan, Residential Schedule or Child Support Order only if parentage has already been established by:

■ Paternity Acknowledgment or■ Court order that decided parentage.

I f parentage was established by a court order, use this form only if your proposed plan or schedule would not change the custodian named in the order establishing parentage.

I. Basis

1.1 Cause of Action

This action is brought by (name) Sophia Rutschow, petitioner, for aResidential schedule/parenting plan and child support order for Abigail Lensch, (age) 6, residing

with Nathan Lensch (temporarily) in Pierce County, Washington.

1.2 Paternity Acknowledgment and Denial of Paternity

Nathan Lensch is the child’s acknowledged father and (name) Sophia Rutschow is the mother of the child. Both parents signed the Paternity Acknowledgment, which was filed with the Washington State Registrar of Vital Statistics on (date) November 3, 2007.

A copy of the child’s birth certificate or Paternity Acknowledgment issued by the State of Washington where the child was bom, is filed with this petition under the Sealed

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 1 of 5 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW26.26.130(7)(b), .375

■'i*-V ,

Page 66: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Acknowledgment/Denial of Paternity/Birth Certificate Cover Sheet, form WPF PS 15.0150, By Daniel Cook (Nathans attorney).

O';UJ

1.3 Order Establishing Parentage *

Does not apply.

1.4 Jurisdiction

The court has jurisdiction over the parties because (check all that apply):

A judgment and order establishing parentage was entered, or a Paternity Acknowledgment was signed by the parents and filed.

Petitioner and respondent resided with the child in this state.

1.5 Period for Challenge to the Acknowledgment or Denial of Paternity (Pick only one)

A period of four years or more has passed since the date the Paternity Acknowledgment, and if required, the Denial of Paternity was filed with the Washington State Registrar of Vital Statistics.

1.6 Jurisdiction Over the Child

This court has jurisdiction over the child for the reasons set forth below.

This court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction. The court has previously made a child custody, parenting plan, residential schedule or visitation determination in this matter and retains jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.211.

This state is the home state of the child because the child and the parent or the child and at least one parent or person acting as a parent have significant connection with the state other than mere physical presence, and substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child’s care, protection, training and personal relationships, and the child has no home state elsewhere.

No other state has jurisdiction.

Other:

Temporary custody was granted to Nathan Lensch on August 14, 2014.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 2 of 5WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 67: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1.7 Child Support

Support, including medical support, for the minor child has not been determined administratively by the Division of Child Support and the petitioner does want the court to address child support.

1.8 Residential Placement

It is in the child’s best interests for the court to enter the Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule proposed by Sophia Rutschow.

During the last five years, the child has lived in no place other than the state of Washington and with no persons other than Sophia Rutschow and Nathan Lensch.

Claims to custody or visitation:

I do not know of any person other than a named party who has physical custody of, or claims to have custody or visitation rights to the child.

Involvement in any other proceeding concerning the child:

I have not been involved in any other proceeding regarding the child.

On August 14, 2014 Nathan Lensch informed me of a CPS report filed against him. I was not invited to be present at the time of the interview with him or my daughter. I spoke with the Social Worker assigned to the case which has yet to be closed.

Other legal proceedings concerning the child:

I do not know of any other legal proceedings concerning the child.

1.9 Reimbursement

I would request that Nathan Lensch be required to pay for any/all costs incurred pertaining to the legal proceedings of this case including but not limited to court costs, copies, filing fees, the parenting class I am required to take and the random UA’s etc. I would also like for Nathan to be required to pay any/all lost wages I have or will lose due to court appearances.

1.10 Continuing Restraining Order

A continuing restraining order should be entered which restrains or enjoins Nathan Lensch from disturbing the peace of Sophia Rutschow.

A continuing restraining order should be entered which restrains or enjoins Nathan Lensch from assaulting, harassing, stalking, or molesting Sophia Rutschow or the child, or using, attempting to use, or threatening to use physical force against the protected party or the child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury, or engaging in other conduct that would place the protected party in reasonable fear of bodily injury to himself/herself or the child. (If the court orders this relief, the restrained person may be prohibited from obtaining or possessing a firearm,

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 3 of 5 WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 68: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

other dangerous weapon, concealed pistol license, or ammunition under state or federal law for the duration of the order.)

1.11 Protection Order

Does not apply.

1.12 Other

Nathan Lensch suffers from untreated Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and full blown alcoholism. The United States Army and the Department of Veterans affairs have knowledge and pertinent evidence regarding his alcoholism and PTSD. I, Sophia Rutschow, decided to leave the home that Nathan and I shared for about 6 years because I realized that he wasn’t ever going to seek professional treatment for his alcohol abuse and it was no longer safe for my daughter and I to be in his presence.

II. Relief Requested

The court is requested to enter an order that:

determines support, including medical support, for the dependent child pursuant to the Washington State child support statutes.

orders the respondent to pay past support, medical, and other expenses incurred on behalf of the child.

adopts the residential schedule/parenting plan for the child as proposed by petitioner,

awards court costs, guardian ad litem, attorney, and other reasonable fees,

makes provision for a continuing restraining order.

other: orders that Nathan Lensch be required to seek professional treatment for and provide proof of treatment for his alcoholism (he can get treatment for his alcoholism, free of charge, at the VA hospital in Lakewood, WA. Hospital staff have already completed an evaluation and determined that Nathan needs aggressive in-patient rehabilitation).

Requests that the court require Nathan Lensch to provide copies of his Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Records, Relevant Army Records as to when, why and how he avoided Active Duty when the Army re-called him, and the current attendance records/Human Resources communication at his current employer (will show proof of his continued unacceptable attendance/tardiness related to the on-going drinking abuse)

Requests that Nathan Lensch be restricted from allowing our minor child to have any contact with Annie Rice, Dan Rice or their children.

Dated: August 23, 2014 x___________________________________Signature of Petitioner or Lawyer/WSB A No.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 4 of 5WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 69: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

III. Declaration

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that I am the petitioner hereinabove named, that I have made the allegations contained in this petition based upon my first hand knowledge, and therefore believe that they are true.

Pet for Res Sched/Par Plan and Child Support (PT) - Page 5 o f 5WPF PS 15.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375

Page 70: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0 43247973 CP09-09-14

SUPERIOR COURT OF..WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY

IN RE:

/O.iJcH'ULn F L e n s c h

Petitioner/Plaintiff,Vs.

Respondent/D efendant.______________

) No. 7 - 6 3 I3 -7 - 0

^ - A d - r k v n ^ J ^ n W ry ru C 'ft 'ry )

Dated thisSignature

O v fA t* f i titure \ V

2007.docunicnt.covershect.doc

Page 71: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

ID ' \ t 0P- wvv \OoOuDypU X r hcbKu>o hue,T iUb J t<v (XvyoVuiV- Twytii MO cyhxn tafo sY/ Vi S T>ooV A \ W cU y w L / M r v o o v b - j r * u m J tVa r

DATE: 4 /11 /13

TO:

CC:

FROM:

SU BJEC T:

N athan Lensch

Fluman Resources A ttendance D atabase Em ployee Personne l File

M ason M yers

Final W arn ing - A ttendance

W V ju

From 4/11/12 to 4 /11 /13 you have had 7 days o f absence. The breakdow n o f absences is attached.

You have been g iven c lear instructions as to w ha t w ou ld be accep tab le tim e m issed. It has a lso been noted tha t fa ilu re to com p ly w ith the PA C C A R standard fo r accep tab le a ttendance wouid be dealt w ith fu rthe r d isc ip linary action up to and including te rm ina tion .

Y our poor a ttendance m ust im prove im m ediate ly . Any fu rthe r s ick days during the next 6 m onths or until your a ttendance is once again w ith in acceptab le lim its*, w h icheve r is longer, w ill resu lt in fu rthe r d isc ip lina ry action up to and inc lud ing te rm ina tion o f your em p loym en t w ith D ynacraft.You m ust also c o m p ly w ith D ynacra ft’s expecta tions in the area o f quality, p roductiv ity, and team w ork. Should you successfu lly com p le te th is p roba tionary period you w ill then be required to m aintain your a ttendance w ith in the PAC C AR standards.

If you have a persona l issue that is causing you to have th is a ttendance prob lem you should cons ider consu lting w ith the confiden tia l Em ployee A ss is tance P rogram . I have a ttached a copy o f the brochure to th is le tter fo r your re fe rence. .

Your fu tu re w ith D ynacra ft is now in your hands. .Y ou m ust com p ly w ith the PAC C AR attendance and perfo rm ance s tandards to rem ain em p loyed with D ynacraft.

Supervisor Name Date

N o te : You are not e lig ib le to use the 30-m inu te ta rd iness benefit until your a ttendance is once again w ith in accep tab le lim its*, or 12 m on ths from the date o f 3rd tard iness, w h icheve r is longer. Failure to com p ly w ill result in ta rd iness a ffecting your overall a ttendance {1/2 a ttendance occurrence fo r absences less than 4 hours in a w orkday and 1 a ttendance occurrence fo rabsences g rea te r than 4 hours in a w orkday).

£

I have rece ived a copy o f th is Final W arn ing m em orandum :

Employee Name ■ Date

(toorV

i H - a - c h o i - t )

Page 72: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

J ' W i CL5> £ A )fc jlj2 /V l(!JL > * £ +D W )£ C f i S u k 's )

V v s w a ^ L ' a i c U d U i T A ¥ b c J t o W o l . ^ d r W v i I s ^ v j o i m w v j s k h s t o l a s n o ju;, c X ;%,_ev u g._Aj&._..oi?<:y\Cp /; X. rh o r^s C.&UX W .ku ..krs ■

^ ATTENDANCE OCCURRENCES FOR NATHAN J r p n q p h J

J

LENSCH Hire Date: 2/23/2011

SUPERVISORMASON MYERS

to i+ w u i c l j :

v \V ^ r

^ P H - e r h o

9 .

*

Jc ^ C

( j s 'o a A - '

Zd)& # •

0 4 /

DATE OCCURRENCE TYPE # OF OCCURRENCES # OF HOURS COMMENTS4/25/2012 Sl^K 1 8.00 called in sick5/3/2012 OTHER 0.5 4.00 short notice allowed time, Dr. note5/16/2012 OTHER 0 8.00 WFCA child in hospital &5/17/2012 OTHER 0 8.00 . WFCA child in hospital / / 1

___ V'_\A__<-5/18/2012 OTHER . J 0 8.00 WFCA child in hospital \ '\ \ _ x r6/5/2012 OTHER 0 8.00 WFCA taking care of child J V\A£$7/12/2012 OTHER 0 8.00 WFCA taking care of child ^ /

7/17/2012 SICK 1 8.00 called in sick

7/26/2012 SICK 1 8.00 called in sick

8/17/2012 TARDY 0.5 0.30 Tardy for overtime

8/24/2012 TARDY O ' , 0.25 2nd courtesy tardy —^ ^

9/14/2012 OTHER 0 4.00 WFCA taking care of wife A11/5/2012 OTHER 0 8.00 WFCA taking care of child ^

11/13/2012 TARDY 0 0.05 3rd courtesy tardy

11/19/2012 TARDY 0.5 0.25 tardy

12/4/2012 SICK 0 8.00 WFCA taking car^of child

12/5/2012 SICK 0 8.00 WFCA taking care of child

12/13/2012 TARDY 0.5 3.00 tardy-3 hours

12/17/2012 SICK 0 8.00 WFCA taking care of child

1/31/2013 TARDY 0.5 0.50 tardy-30 minutes

3/14/2013 SICK 0 7.75 went home sick-no hit per mm

4/2/2013 SICK 1 8.00 called in sick

4/11/2013 TARDY 0.5 0.03 Tardy 3 minutes

io < y

& fl.

Thursday, April II, 2013 X u>lS av ^ X v i i c ) , j ^ - ( ^ W \ ^ o cVvuil/ i yjc>ty> \ /U k > X

W S <\,VcoW >Vi'5jM x v b V Q y \ W " - \ o o V c a x £ , x _

V o W > c X c o W o \ i5 \M ,

AJ - — ta vw V £ >Page I of 1

3t\S c U U ,X ) ■ M X U rt ' r l u Y tS

Page 73: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Kenneth Glasscock 9117 70lh St SWLakewood WA 98498

August 13, 2014

To the.courts:

I would like'to address the courts and let it be known that Sophia Rutschow and her daughter Abby are currently residing w ith our family at our residence of 9117 70th St. S.W., Lakewood WA 98498. Our family consists of myself, my wife Anne, who is a stay at home mom. We have three daughters, Shaylah (8), Kennah (6), and Hannah (3). As my wife is able to stay home, she . is able to watch Abby fo r Sophia, whep she is at work.

Our home offers 5 bed rooms, 2 -1 /2 bath rooms, open kitchen, dining area, T.V. room, living room, and a nice sized play room. Sophia and Abby have their own bed room that they share together. It has a day bed, w ith a pull out mattress below if needed. If Abby chooses, she can also sleep in the bed room with Shaylah and Kennah, which has a bunk bed, consisting of a full size bottom mattress, and a tw in upper mattress. Since we have plenty of furniture, Sophia and Abby only require their clothing and what personal belongings that they need.

Our home is close to 3000 sq. ft., so it is not really an issue with Sophia and Abby staying with us. They can stay here free of charge, until such a tim e when Sophia is able to afford other accommodations. If the court wishes to know, I have been at my current employment for 15 years, and at my current residence for 5 years.

Kenneth Glasscock

Page 74: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

R id s t b ^ b tO v m & K tei n H - b - t o l t f - 0

%___idhok** /i/i^uj (}c/LC€fyL, _____ _________ _

__t'J! :.Ct.iL#(. T T ..t% jJj£____

J e e u t / e d ^ e - _<&£_ (jxyo/L^ £&>■

&k~*t kxxx . 'J' rttj' £T~T - 'Ht-r /le tr /P t'P u tA . *l /&+

„.A _M_0p$kf±j a '/tfU T pTaO$. &JJ& .X" ki& Jp& pf {Jo>p/ti'c^

fnGQe Jxvfis- . / qMeuJoosLTo -/e Y ' / y 'iWtcT A!a ace^s J%co£e <A __.

~£c( C . W h e / e < Ske.lc?A!X ^JP X ^ ~t° feuAr. OsTt.. & O/ba*^ r®OM..

j/o f__bef„ ±z.jxd_ hex, r .

To fry.. besT olOIpAj P krP <S/zy cXtT Amup. COS J x rf iT Tto\x\. jujiyaT: }S A p h P .}i& d c/xsen jb&d p\S a fflicw A 'o ko&S€ TL& .A tOeJ ct / \ f4Ue To c? J i r T j ~0 s<xy t Xe kac5+

CS&^ k . ^ 0& S t&.&i/'e-' ot' loe.zk' iV ctye , .tp*-'£..j^>ic&d 6p l/k&v<L'

cyA &TTtiX, heir, P /itxA A^nre ai^J Aysh&tpt jpeccu^ t £aA&. O-f eV (J rn Tkfd)OJ 4_ h^f pk&l€ Xt (\c/_ f£ac(I \\.& 4&cT

M € S $ ^ . ^ a k o o A ih M .p o o r (cvaj* C o M d T x y ^

S'opkxa \ycid AteA\XCOf[eA To *f'W <£ rST<e T h o i^ k T <S4 A

jW/_ (/jcufiAed Td fwzt fee cLftwfkg f jvice&- . a, _/«o e.

CltakeX cA\<J(V Jo CA 6Uto/ aStecd {$ s5?fej'

{prT^ ojxcM tx: pr. Cetvd . tOtule he/; Cc //. ©a. T [ lOi L. Am re 1g ^ tV t d Qv11 ............. ......................

__eyfresscdl Pp hiXt Shp i%T i-eTeoetf.ToPk^e. picLd&'irke Mfioe 6 [)lr-o f her ftI't-'s ..:KooS^^cf _.t*^ ‘tUe p J ^ S k e l J qrk hoW iAh^rt, Sh<<i

J w . < S a ^e c u f

_______ . ............... . . , S cc>t t f $i/tAcxy :

Page 75: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

i ; i t l

............. (o"% j f c - ' o t o r f • ( r ~ a o - W

fcw\kwJI(Ulce, hl&aAvis, Mai? drunk a. 5~^c u p m m *; \o o rriM y id - k a ^ , T §JHKce.i■1 J m J ^ ’ * M §J « 1 jj fc I] # / n W f x t k i r W e a r t ^ ■ft*' mu <A(ocm\aU Ahlod £*Jr-.ek C<s 4J «V1u>4A /uleto v )k x T - *__q\ o a <?& 0£ lf-r4" *\ jp - P ~ h . H i . § p & * d ' < j u £ , , c^and _a^

/* m u x * mm f pAJnn s waJ

K ) 4 \ ~ H C p d ~ ~

i ____ tund r t r O O S \& M - •

s k( e ‘ 2 & - i * f .

< k 4 J l^ lA U c *.

• /^ ? f A < 0 ^ 1 ____ 5__■___ .c \ M ^ * r \ L * / [

n rrrh

v - a - H . . ~ It i c d t H )4 S c L n OEfrlC

T u H C heck on*a u ( w i r m (* JK g . j v u W

&hk CM kgTVw ..^ _

- E f -f

>aw y . f.m ,___ W rt/a f e a r H ^ y w y Jg M A o 4 t i^ ~ i. it /^

MUm L J L M l

s t v iw m-g.•vWMi ^ H i n o

i> Jgj>/9| J - $t*JlA A -P iL oPldc ill /9rhnr -f? ■ jpggEg— r,-Vi6f U)Q«k Av AJgp..

& j k W e c a n e SO u f C f r f t y c c ^ k £ c M t i t d yA O ,

cS H ay a . S '-C jx v d U

f p p A K l» v ) .~ j^

f r jp f t t n ~ bJvoncld

Warns? m.d trch Ujxj/O.

c to y ty M - i l < P

y ip rjA ^ k M a o mm e

j k l r i t>y£ f 4 : 4 -

iw a Jm e . • Ue, /l(j c a i d " f f * . f i fo . ) J i v )

iv g - f q o f tw 4 o ' j - A i / - - f ly

J MSdL*rf\

4- s K o fltC iw w ir m « g .

S t y lo s

H - 3 - d3 I ^ 7 - 0

a ^ M f l ^ a V e ;J a > u | t n A v k g !

d id 'f r b i tu r w .t k

Page 76: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

I - J ) 1

le '& ■ - !<f c ^ d (g)— j / p - z n - i f . ^

— f l j x i! k ^ ,------- 1 tail y c a u tf ' h&

l ^ n t i i A P-ft

Av>i\/frta homfc iUa rx fc k g /f M > iL j 'r A r m a a p ( W u y j- hfkir.e-t • /Tfc»bA

~H> lebute!

fo T aJooy-i- h n / tb'nJr * t - H l i c c . J

mtclff kM \JLMU„ -P*'~ H v g Y tfY)t«kfr.

j n u f q -r u n h n u / ' d - fo K / u ^ t g ’

m i n/ i * . - t o d - H t f S z p i|/0<Jf h Z M i A a '

tX C - < t t i ! ^ U c j k v O & g

J y ajAdy — ; 4 1 I&aISL- wt«i2"X A&k&d tatvYl SC

h*M hecjuuP, he k*xjCOh KUArt f j - ^ v v P - fW

6 ^ 4 - \H )c ( k ^ -

'rtgyu

Ajwtf. 4 v-Hm j u i-fi a n o r y ^ k f n i« ______

Page 77: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

14-3-03127-0 43247991 AFRSP 09-09-14 a m. SEP 0 5 20ft pm.PlfCECOUNXY WASHINGTON KEVIN S j d y igjQ ^ nty Clerk

Superior Court of Washington County of Pierce

In re the Parenting and Support of: Abigail Lensch,

Child, No. 1443-03127-0Sophia Rutschow,

andPetitioner, Declaration of

Sophia RutschowNathan Lensch

Respondent.

I, Sophia Rutschow, make the following statement on the basis of my personal knowledge.

Nathan Lensch and I did reside together for approximately eight (8) years. Nathan and I had one

child together, Abigail Lensch, who is now six years old. Nathan and I have lived with our daughter her

entire life.

I decided to end my relationship with Nathan Lensch about four months ago when I finally

realized he wasn’t ever going to seek the necessary treatment for his alcoholism. We continued living

together (in a very stressful and negative environment) while I was looking for employment and weighing

my options for a new residence.

RESIDENCES OF THE PARENTS

Both Nathan and I live in Lakewood, Washington. I live with a good friend Anne Glasscock and

her family. I recently moved into their home after staying with another friend (Annie Rice) for a short

period of time. I was not kicked out of the Rice residence. I moved out by choice (the living conditions

were not safe, sanitary or stable). The home was filthy, the children were unruly and destructive, Annie

and her husband were having marital problems, Dan Rice was/is in treatment for drugs and Mr. and Mrs.

Rice let a known registered sex offender on their property.

Declaration (DCLR) - Page 1 of I_____

WPF DRPSCU 01.0100 (6/2006) f

Page 78: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

WORK SCHEDULES OF THE PARENTSJ-” I work at German Pastry and Coffee Shop in Lakewood, Washington. One week I work Monday

11:00 am to 5:00 pm, Tuesday-Friday 12:00 pm to 4:00 pm and Saturday-Monday off. The next week I

work Tuesday-Friday 11:00 am to 5:00 pm, Saturday 11:00 am to 4:00 pm and Sunday off. This is my set

schedule.

Nathan works at Paccar in Algona, Washington. His schedule is Monday-Friday 6:30 am to 3:00

pm. He leaves his home at 5:15 am to drop our daughter off at Daycare and picks her up from Daycare at

4:00 pm.

SCHOOL AND DAYCARE SCHEDULE FOR ABIGAIL

Abigail attends Park Lodge Elementary School in Lakewood. I enrolled her there because after

school YMCA childcare is offered on-sight so Abby would be able to be transported to and from school

by Nathan and me. (Nathan and I previously agreed that we didn’t want Abigail riding a school bus at her

age). Park Lodge hours are from 8:00 am to 2:30 pm. I only work part-time so I am able to take my

daughter to school every day. I intend to utilize the YMCA after school child care. Nathan is able to pick

Abigail up from Daycare at 4:00 pm. I work a few blocks away from Park Lodge so I would be able to

pick her up from Daycare at 4:15 pm or 5:15 pm depending on my work schedule.

RCW 26.09.191 FACTORS - ALCOHOL ABUSE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

I have repeatedly expressed my concerns to Nathan about his alcohol addiction for several years.

Nathan failed to even make an attempt to either slow down on his alcohol consumption or seek

professional help. I would have liked to have been employed sooner than now but I’d have needed to

work nights due to Nathan’s work schedule, but I refused to work nights because I knew that my daughter

wouldn’t be safe or taken care of appropriately in Nathan’s inebriated state. Nathan drank about a fifth of

liquor a day for at least the past four years. He always started drinking when he arrived home from work

and would pass out drunk, on the couch, by 7:00 pm. Our daughter insisted on waking him up just about

every night because she wanted to spend time with him. It wasn’t safe for us to attempt to wake him

because he was usually incoherent, mumbling things that didn’t make sense and physically abusive. For

the past year or so it reached the point of Abby no longer wanting to wake him up because she was

terrified of Nathan being mean and/or physically hurting us. Abigail knew and would tell me that “Daddy

had too many grown up drinks.”

In late March of this year (2014) I finally expressed my concerns to Nathan’s parents, I could no

longer handle his addiction and the emotional and physical abuse (against Abigail and I) and neglect that

we had to endure for far too long. I felt isolated, helpless and scared for the safety and well being of my

Declaration (DCLR) - Page 2 of ^WPF DRPSCU 01.0100 (6/2006)

Page 79: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

daughter and I. I didn’t know what else to do besides an intervention. Jane Lensch (Nathan’s Mother)

was very supportive and helpful. She was able to set up an Evaluation for Nathan at the Veteran’s

Hospital in Lakewood. Mrs. Lensch was very concerned about the situation so she flew up here to ensure

that Nathan followed through with the beginning steps of seeking proper treatment.

The staff member who evaluated Nathan at Veterans Hospital concluded that Nathan requires

aggressive in-patient treatment, he would have been required to live at the hospital for several months to

complete this form of treatment, and Nathan refused because his employment is a priority. Nathan also

refused aggressive out- patient treatment and a three day course of medicine to help with detoxification

and its side effects. Nathan has not followed through with any sort of treatment for his disease. The fact

that he suffers from untreated (but diagnosed) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is a partial cause of his

binge drinking.

Nathan is an unpredictable physically and emotionally abusive alcoholic. I only called the police

on him one time near the end of July this year; (I didn’t call about prior incidents because I was afraid of

what Nathan would do, he was the sole provider of the household and I already felt trapped in a vicious

never-ending cycle of abuse), he was not arrested because he lied to the police officer and can easily hide

his insobriety from strangers. The police officer I spoke with told me to get a no contact order against

him but I chose not to because he had no other place to live for the few weeks I was still residing with

him.

I’m proud to say that I’m a great mother and my number one priority is my amazing daughter. I

chose not to work that way I could always be home to care for and protect my daughter from her father’s

drunken episodes. Nathan grabbed Abby’s forearms hard enough to make her cry just about every day. I

often had to intervene to prevent bruising and further physical abuse. On the one occasion that I should

have called the police, Nathan was asleep/passed out drunk on the couch (July 2014) and Abigail was

trying to wake him up...Our front door was open (I was on the porch smoking) and I heard my daughter

start screaming in horror... I walked over to the window and witnessed Nathan holding Abigail down by

the upper arms and slamming her against the couch...I banged on the window to let him know I was

aware of what he was doing... before I could get into the house my daughter started crying in pain

again... As I scooped her up to console her I made it very clear to Nathan not to touch or come near her

for the rest of the night... he passed out again and was oblivious to what he had just done... I don’t want

to speculate on what may have happened next but it wouldn’t have been good. (Annie Rice is aware of

this incident because I called her right after I had Abigail settled and safe in bed).

Declaration (DCLR) - Page 3 of bWPF DRPSCU 01.0100 (6/2006)

Page 80: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Nathan has hit me a handful of times but I didn’t ever report it so I have no proof other than my

word. Nathan has been emotionally abusive toward me for years. I chose to leave him because I could no

longer subject my daughter and I to the negative, abusive, unstable environment that we were living in. I

feel happy and relieved that I left and my anxiety has decreased so much that I rarely take Xanax

anymore.

I am not a violent person but I have made mistakes in the past. I do not suffer from any

psychological issues other than anxiety. I am not an alcoholic or drug addict. (I have never used illegal

drugs except experimentation with Marijuana in my teens).

Nathan does not know my friend, Scott Fomby. Nathan is judging him solely on the fact that he

has a criminal record. None of his criminal history involves offenses against children. There is absolutely

no reason that my daughter should be restricted from being in the presence of my close friend Scott

Fomby. Scott has been a part of my life for 15 years and will continue to be in my life for the foreseeable

future. He has been very supportive of me and a positive influence. “One should not judge a book by its

cover”. (For example, Nathan Lensch looks great on paper but l know him as a person and he is mean,

irresponsible, manipulative, lazy, selfish, conniving, contradictive, unable to admit to his own personal

issues, etc and last but not least a very good father when he is not under the influence which is RARE.

Nathan missed several days of work in July 2014 all related to his alcohol abuse. He was late on

several occasions too. It is my understanding that Nathan is at warning level of being terminated for his

on-going attendance issues. In the month of July 2014 he asked to take our daughter to the doctor on

three occasions to avoid further disciplinary action at his current employer. Our daughter’s pediatrician

has always been willing to fill out a form that allows Nathan to be paid for missing work if he needed to

take Abigail to the doctor. Nathan has taken advantage of this at least 10 times, again to avoid further

discipline regarding his poor attendance directly related to his alcoholism. In 2012 and 2013 I had to set

my alarm to make sure that Nathan was up for work on time due to his excessive drinking every evening.

Nathan has a new girlfriend which worries me because I don’t know anything about her or how

long or well he knows her. I asked Nathan for her name but he refused to tell me. My daughter has been

in her company several times which concerns me because Nathan and I have always kept our daughter

sheltered from strangers. Nathan has also told me that his is using a dating website and is involved with

three women on-line.

I am proposing that Nathan be required to continue with his weekly random UAs for the duration

of six additional months. Nathan shall also be required to obtain treatment for his alcoholism and Post

Traumatic Stress Disorder. As long as Nathan is getting clean UAs he should be allowed unsupervised

Declaration (DCLR) - Page 4 o f J f _WPF DRPSCU 01.0100 (6/2006) 1

Page 81: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

visits every other weekend. I am opposed to a 50/50 equally shared residential schedule at this time but

am willing to revisit this option in the future if Nathan has completed a treatment program for his

alcoholism and has been proved he is clean and sober for a period of no less than ONE year.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed at |K -C-Q VyUC [City] U ) / K [State] on ^ [Date].

Print or Type NameSignature oqDeclarant v

Declaration (DCLR) - Page 5 of i t 'WPF DRPSCU 01.0100 (6/2006)

Page 82: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

IN COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE

m/FwcTrtSiJ yyASH)NGTON KEVIN ST0OK,JiQunty ClerkB r----------- y ,, DEPUTV

Superior Court of Washington County of

In re the Parenting and Support of:

Abigail LenschChild(ren)

No. 14-3-03127-0

Sophia RutschowPetitioner

Proposed Parenting Plan

and (p p p )

Nathan Lensch

Respondent.

This parenting plan is proposed by Sophia Rutschow.

It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed:

I. General Information

This parenting plan applies to the following children:

Name AgeAbigail Lensch 6 II.

II. Basis for Restrictions

Under certain circumstances, as outlined below, the court may limit or prohibit a parent's contact with the child(ren) and the right to make decisions for the child(ren).

2.1 Parental Conduct (RCW 26.09.191(1), (2))

The father’s residential time with the child(ren) shall be limited or restrained completely, and mutual decision-making and designation of a dispute resolution process other than court action shall not be

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 1 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187;. 194

Page 83: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

required because this parent has engaged in the conduct which follows:

Physical, sexual or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child.A history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm.

2.2 Other Factors (RCW 26.09.191(3))

The father’s involvement or conduct may have an adverse effect on the child’s best interests because of the existence of the factors which follow:

Neglect or substantial nonperformance of parenting functions.A long-term emotional or physical impairment which interferes with the performance of parenting functions as defined in RCW 26.09.004.A long-term impairment resulting from drug, alcohol, or other substance abuse that interferes with the performance of parenting functions.The abusive use of conflict by the parent which creates the danger of serious damage to the child’s psychological development.Other: A long history of abusing my daughter and I emotionally and on occasion, physically

III. Residential ScheduleThe residential schedule must set forth where the child(ren) shall reside each day o f the year; including provisions for holidays, birthdays o f family members, vacations, and other special occasions, and what contact the child(ren) shall have with each parent Parents are encouraged to create a residential schedule that meets the developmental needs o f the child(ren) and individual needs o f their family. Paragraphs 3.1 through 3.9 are one way to write your residential schedule. I f you do not use these paragraphs, write in your own schedule in Paragraph 3.13.

3.1 Schedule for Children Under School age.

There are no children under school age.

3.2 School Schedule

Upon enrollment in school, the child shall reside with the mother, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, from Friday at 4:00 pm through Sunday at 8:00 pm every other week.

After the father has three months of clean weekly random UAs, nine additional months of clean monthly random UAs and has sought out and begun treatment for his alcoholism and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (See Paragraph 3.10) then the schedule will be with the father:

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 2 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 84: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

[-

()}

Every Friday from 4:00 pm through Sunday at 8:00 pm and every Wednesday from 4:00pm to 8:00 pm.

3.3 Schedule for Winter Vacation

The child shall reside with the mother during winter vacation, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Friday(s) at 4:00 pm to Sunday(s) at 8:00 pm and Wednesday(s) from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm.

h-Otj

Winter Vacation shall be defined as commencing the day that school lets out for the Winter Vacation Break and concluding on the day before school resumes.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10,

O'!

The mother shall have the child for the duration of Winter Vacation with the exception of the noted visitation schedule: The father may have the child on December 22nd at 10:00 am through December 24th at 8:00 pm in even numbered years. In odd numbered years the father shall have the child on December 24th from 8:00 pm through December 26th at 8:00 pm.

\ 3.4LH

Schedule for Other School Breaks

The child shall reside with the mother during other school breaks, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Friday(s) at 4:00 pm through Sundays at 8:00 pm and Wednesday(s) from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm.

3.5 Summer Schedule

Upon completion of the school year, the child shall reside with the mother, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Subject to the requirements listed in Paragraph 3.10, Same as school year schedule.

3.6 Vacation With Parents

The schedule for vacation with parents is as follows:

Same as school year schedule.Do not agree to uninterrupted vacation at this time.Father shall not take child out of State without the mother’s written permission.

Subject to the requirements listed in Paragraph 3.10

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 3 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 85: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10:

The residential schedule for the child for the holidays listed below is as follows:

3.7 Schedule for Holidays

i With Mother With Fatherfi ] (Specify Year (Specify Yeari 'i! Odd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

New Year’s Day Even OddMartin Luther King Day Every

H Presidents’ Day EveryMemorial Day Even Odd

C\\ July 4th Even Oddj--. Labor Day Even Odd

Veterans’ Day EveryThanksgiving Day Even OddChristmas Eve See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3Christmas Day See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3

For purposes of this parenting plan, a holiday shall begin and end as follows:

Holidays shall begin the night before at 6:00 pm until the day of the Holiday at 8:00 pm

Holidays which fall on a Friday or a Monday shall include Saturday and Sunday.

See Par. 3.3.

3.8 Schedule for Special Occasions

The residential schedule for the child for the following special occasions (for example, birthdays) is as follows:

With Mother (Specify Year Odd/Even/Every)

Mother’s Day EveryFather’s DayHalloween EveryChild’s Birthday Every

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 4 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

With Father (Specify Year Odd/Even/Every)

Every

Page 86: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

If the Special Occasion falls on a non-school day, the Special Occasion shall be the night before at 4:00 pm until the day of the Special Occasion at 8:00 pm.

If the Special Occasion falls on a school day, the Special Occasion shall be from after school on the day of the Special Occasion until 8:00 pm on the day of the Special Occasion.

3.9 Priorities Under the Residential Schedule

Paragraphs 3.3 - 3.8 have priority over paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 in the following order:

Rank the order of priority, with 1 being given the highest priority:2 winter vacation (3.3) 5 holidays (3.7)1 school breaks (3,4) 4 special occasions (3.8)3 summer schedule (3.5) 6 vacation with parents (3.6)

3.10 Restrictions

The father’s residential time with the children shall be limited because there are limiting factors in paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2. The following restrictions shall apply when the children spend time with this parent:

RANDOM UAsFather is signed up for random weekly UAs with Crossroads Treatment Center. Father shall continue to pay for UAs. The random UAs shall continue until the father has had three months of consecutive clean UAs every week. Father shall continue random UAs for nine additional months at least once a month. Father shall seek treatment for his extreme alcoholism via The Veterans Administration; this service is free to him and a hospital staff member has recently evaluated his addiction and recommended aggressive in-patient treatment.

Father shall seek counseling for his untreated Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. (He is 50% disabled according to the Veterans Administration).

SUPERVISED VISITATIONSupervised visits shall be required if father has a dirty UA or fails to seek appropriate treatment for his alcohol addiction.

If fathers UAs show non-prescribed drug or alcohol use then the father’s visits shall be supervised. The visits shall be supervised by a friend who is known to and approved by the mother. During the period of supervised visits, the visits shall occur one time per week for two hours per visit, at a public location. The supervised visits shall be scheduled and arranged in conjunction with the children’s school schedule and the visitation supervisor’s schedule.

The father’s visits will remain supervised until all of the following conditions have been met for a period of three consecutive months:

1. Three months of clean UAs.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 5 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 87: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

2. Attendance of Alcoholics Anonymous two times a week3. Continued professional treatment for his alcoholism and PTSD4. Father has consistent supervised visitation; has demonstrated the ability

to provide a safe, drug/alcohol free and nurturing home environment.5. Father has demonstrated the ability to maintain safe and reliable

transportation for the child.

3.11 Transportation Arrangements

Transportation costs are included in the Child Support Worksheets and/or the Order for Child Support and should not be included here.

Transportation arrangements for the child, between parents shall be as follows:

Mother shall provide transportation while father’s visitation is supervised.

When visitation is unsupervised, transportation will be shared equally with the receiving parent picking up the child at the start of his or her residential time.

3.12 Designation of Custodian

The child named in this parenting plan is scheduled to reside the majority of the time with the mother. This parent is designated the custodian of the child solely for purposes of all other state and federal statutes which require a designation or determination of custody. This designation shall not affect either parent’s rights and responsibilities under this parenting plan.

3.13 Other

Both parents shall provide an emotionally and physically safe home for the child. The home should be sanitary at all times.

Both parents shall provide adequate bedrooms for the child to sleep in a comfortable home environment that is not crowded.

Both parents shall refrain from the use of alcohol and illegal drugs or prescription medication except as directed by a physician with a lawful prescription.

Neither parent shall transport, nor allow any other individual to transport, the child in a vehicle except with a driver with a valid driver’s license, in an insured vehicle and using all lawful child safety restraints.

Neither parent shall allow the child to be taken care of (babysat) by any individual who hasn’t been approved by both parents.

The father shall not have the child in the company of any of his multiple female companions. (The child is scared and uncomfortable around unknown adults).

3.14 Summary of RCW 26.09.430 - 480, Regarding Relocation of a Child

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 6 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 88: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

This is a summary only. For the full text, please see RCW 26.09.430 through 26.09.480.

If the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time plans to move, that person shall give notice to every person entitled to court ordered time with the child.

If the move is outside the child’s school district, the relocating person must give notice by personal service or by mail requiring a return receipt. This notice must be at least 60 days before the intended move. If the relocating person could not have known about the move in time to give 60 days’ notice, that person must give notice within 5 days after learning of the move. The notice must contain the information required in RCW 26.09.440. See also form DRPSCU 07.0500, (Notice of Intended Relocation of a Child).

If the move is within the same school district, the relocating person must provide actual notice by any reasonable means. A person entitled to time with the child may not object to the move but may ask for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

Notice may be delayed for 21 days if the relocating person is entering a domestic violence shelter or is moving to avoid a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to health and safety.

If information is protected under a court order or the address confidentiality program, it may be withheld from the notice.

A relocating person may ask the court to waive any notice requirements that may put the health and safety of a person or a child at risk.

Failure to give the required notice may be grounds for sanctions, including contempt.

If no objection is filed within 30 days after service of the notice of intended relocation, the relocation will be permitted and the proposed revised residential schedule may be confirmed.

A person entitled to time with a child under a court order can file an objection to the child’s relocation whether or not he or she received proper notice.

An objection may be filed by using the mandatory pattern form WPF DRPSCU 07.0700, (Objection to Relocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule). The objection must be served on all persons entitled to time with the child.

The relocating person shall not move the child during the time for objection unless: (a) the delayed notice provisions apply; or (b) a court order allows the move.

If the objecting person schedules a hearing for a date within 15 days of timely service of the objection, the relocating person shall not move the child before the hearing unless there is a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to the health or safety of a person or a child.

IV. Decision Making

4.1 Day to Day Decisions

Each parent shall make decisions regarding the day-to-day care and control of each child while the child is residing with that parent. Regardless of the allocation of decision making in this parenting plan, either parent may make emergency decisions affecting the health or safety of the children.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 7 o f 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 89: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

4.2

Major decisions regarding each child shall be made as follows:

Major Decisions

Education decisions motherNon-emergency health care motherReligious upbringing motherOut of State Travel motherChildcare mother

4.3 Restrictions in Decision Making

Sole decision making shall be ordered to the mother for the following reasons:

One parent is opposed to mutual decision making, and such opposition is reasonably based on the following criteria:

(a) The existence of a limitation under RCW 26.09.191;(b) The history of participation of each parent in decision making in each of

the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a);(c) Whether the parents have demonstrated ability and desire to cooperate

with one another in decision making in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a); and

(d) The parents’ geographic proximity to one another, to the extent that it affects their ability to make timely mutual decisions.

V. Dispute Resolution

The purpose o f this dispute resolution process is to resolve disagreements about carrying out this parenting plan. This dispute resolution process may, and under some local court rules or the provisions o f this plan must, be used before filing a petition to modify the plan or a motion for contempt for failing to follow the plan.

Disputes between the parties, other than child support disputes, shall be submitted to (list person or agency):

Mediation by Pierce County Dispute Resolution Center.

The cost of this process shall be allocated between the parties as follows:

20% mother; 80% father.

The dispute resolution process shall be commenced by notifying the other party by written request via certified mail.

In the dispute resolution process:

(a) Preference shall be given to carrying out this Parenting Plan.(b) Unless an emergency exists, the parents shall use the designated process to resolve

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 8 of 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 90: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

disputes relating to implementation of the plan, except those related to financial support.(c) A written record shall be prepared of any agreement reached in counseling or mediation

and of each arbitration award and shall be provided to each party.(d) If the court finds that a parent has used or frustrated the dispute resolution process

without good reason, the court shall award attorney's fees and financial sanctions to the other parent.

(e) The parties have the right of review from the dispute resolution process to the superior court.

VI. Other Provisions

There are no other provisions.

(Only sign if this is a proposed parenting plan.) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that this plan has been proposed in good faith and that the statements in Part II of thisrRlan are true and correct.

Motherr1 S ' )

Date and Place4 j U ) t: (City arid State) of Signature

Father Date and Place (City and State) of Signature

VIII. Order by the Court

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the parenting plan set forth above is adopted and approved as an order of this court.

Warning: Violation of residential provisions of this order with actual knowledge of its terms is punishable by contempt of court and may be a criminal offense under RCW 9A.40.060(2) or RCW 9A.40.070(2). Violation of this order may subject a violator to arrest.

When mutual decision making is designated but cannot be achieved, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the issue through the dispute resolution process.

If a parent fails to comply with a provision of this plan, the other parent’s obligations under the plan are not affected.

Dated: ° \ _________________ ______________________________________Judge/Commissioner

Presented by: * Approved for entry:

Signature of Party or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print Name

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 9 o f 10WPF PS 15.0600 Mandatory (6/2008) - R CW 26.26.375, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194

Page 91: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1111

14-3-03127-0 43248003 AFRSP

W COUNTY Fd [ l^ s09-09-14

office

id veVltsM , H T nc i/io

. \4 h »?> - d^ i q - R ^

“tVii'S o\jOvVir\a ( ad aWxp-o J J1 'C) T 5~L? j >v\a 1 a r n \ J (Vi a .+ MtcHieuVsCJ

r\ oAt> c U ta > rv iu d c t u a V i - k r /> - r . l/U >on

SI' ' J U 1

0~FT

cornsicU _l ^\AC>C/teol b n d V \ d c l b o r c k m o

fX-Vler r/OoiiMi- 5 w iv m ^ S "W av?, u k r no

(XiA.CoQftJ. T iv°i u3\WouJ

S tv v O - b i a ^ v O o c M u y i iC c a

T m ^ - W c o u c A n , M a V A \w v - i( ^ f c S - l q o a Cj? / iO

i.oR-S ' - H i a i frO io H o cov i b u ? , n i r m h b j

S o X .V y -Q C -e p ^ d V o Od \ l A c ^ o \ \ c £ , / o p

g ib^^ A , ft^ynRtl a.vU ,T ^ nP aiopi

P ~ p , \ D ( P Dn -H v £ A D O f r o P A i g 'v p Q p

^ffcVVOy" P ioP m l H a a i u a i i

o JiMifi -H\i> olopr, t Kyn ajl) \ t

Page 92: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0
Page 93: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0
Page 94: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

»

i.l’iCO t \w Iw "\fij(\ \S not (Xi oio^d t )V , . v f\

fof\Stu/v\£ cucovun a)Ktk Cumd -fo rr

dux (mxkoXUjf, iiXdtitfun V-Wio \\oJvn ' a ■ \/\f rH'l _LA¥ q cu , t V iSsif-A^tTt,' ^ v\k£ n \llr cutt; i J ' s

.

%': 00 i>y\A .Vnj'

w \ ~i i to lU["S lAVN^ofHmat ~Xhty- Of0Ss>fl)0uA*f’1 1 . , .

^Jbf\WX K oOdM fn d ftu -{] E f 1 vxjffuM Y^qUit'-fKcof KUtkflil[ M ^ 1 1' l i i t i/V j |

1) f W c\ U| \ \v^m M a t\iu ,t f1 / l ' l t y

Nvm ritiUGWkx ro t a-muin it) S'wsl wlrtlo1 j TW <Md ~tvu <?A/Q/\ly\d 1 <w. \f\itr aojih j

i r i 1 ^ 1V^wnwlim u, TKU \vasV \M\1 ri/axrJ 0 1

btUm Sl KIfjdVicM vM \ia n.J c.ont(fi(m 10tv

tossi Ab{ Wer.

lSjf\ ft* yvii, 1>i olPiti ityffr>rf"-'Ji i T O i i m , (o ')

- , ‘l-'H jtirv , ■ CY5 -Q ^ y ^ ^ ic b d iW ^ ¥ W ^ ^ j 2j 2__

Page 95: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14*3-03127-0 43252970 ST 09-09-14

INCOUNTY1SARK'S OFFICE

a m . SEP 08 2014 PNlPIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON KEVIN STOCK, County Cterk

SUPERIOR COURT OF .WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY r

IN RE:

5 > b i > V v . ^ p . a 'k c t a c r v J

Petitioner/PlaintifF,Vs.

Respondcnt/Defendant._____________

)))

) No. 1*4 ~ I oU ~ Q) j (Document T itle ) j

) | \ N i W s SI 1— - ---------

Dated thisSignature

2007.doeumcnLcovcrslieet, doc

Page 96: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

H - S - o W l - o

°H2q~ L ]jD ix .^h i-l)o a u - C&C£o l-U_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. ~Tte r fa ^ /Y, u)hiA Sophia. J)a s

. rnovfnL nu-0 oi^^Ohe/e ho/ne AshfryzuSiP. o f ' flcNAasi's ntsfnM va ds&L f j i r 4/lA ',n/i y f o Me in CL m ore 'Sa&._

. ^ A X b o n D e ^ iL A lir^ C fl^ ^ e r_ c ta ^ k ^ __J5.£pL±a^— cS_ _ CL^g/m ^t_^ooQ 2i hD.... z& i _ _ _ _ _

li_ s lic J m u ^ ^ Q ± & W J L b ^U n W i h f r * ? & > /to y< °d L O i l y # -

. m e ^nepoi 'tbr a OCupIp &£rfa tp a m i,S Q k 3 H brvt rb.. khS_/iM ^5o^n^cLSrh2/f^_ _ _ _

s , ' P 5 / Q g rrDVecL ' a LOM h /)$M>er .SDmei^hrjit y/icohs Sfajb/e ard a£o C/ose k> her '\pJ-> rxmi ^ her d a u ghters scted*

^plta sc Otri ^Bee sb q-,ve m t n (V i! rfp: <$ 5 3 ~ h1<fc}-tf3fr)Q> / / ijm hcttie gnu Q r Om CtrnS •_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-*ffl6br-£S -----------------

o L L u c iu s ^ T o fc r= > -

C LVvJ c V ^ e S S S H i^ V v v ^ A A j t

I a v jA '

9 W

Page 97: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

s rHTCu

' r,)j

IM - S - ^ V S n - o

o i\A*M tfc/Lce ry i',y -

iO. V r ■

li'j

\ u

~r

01

cTl

/4 y_ /tcl £^±S __\[cc T t _ -ZLan* kjKt&t

& !*-*{ h & K & ) f ¥ 6 - /u ? t" j ^ t t e i z c / .^ 7 Pi f t l

/Z o u & k l j c th fiiC x j TjOo tO ee-kv a<$o JZ k ^ /p P c / d& p^C c^

friOpp r fg * k .__j(2 k e vJcod To f\? P fen cT / / / ? aCeS A cvS& _a K ____

T fa c o # t^ s < jo tK ~to t c u T oT4r a ^ ff o t / e ro o ^

-fo tr h e f ca^cf h & f ajjfA-b&v^t____________ _____________ _____________

To bes-b k iAcuJlerijP h e P u)l%- Atnu^ ijJ#S __ rf.^T pa^ . u )k a T {ppphCc^ jflttc / cteScr / b e& l 0 3 a . $U K & &t> r { j£ vJ \

liQ V S g • f L & ' f ' ( jp g s ' CL / i '/ / V & ' £ o & M W U S c e j fc te> k c x ^ f " ,_____

CS & p k s * - tO & s T & fev^ c u D e .g & o iv ^ A cPfie, -Q>rc<?ck T o Vk&vQ-,

6u4- a H e if fa P.if / v\'i>U-ck A tA n C t a u u J h o s h e u w d o !< ^ ^ t> e C c u ^

i irecte^ a f W y ^ t ^ k e / p k o n £ a^c/ ^ a d c k j ^ J ^ T —

Ifru fS S ^ ^ n b o o T ftt'Q p oo s Ic v tiy C auc/fTc& ^S ' »

SopKxca \{<lcI ifU.ev&CQiipd To Vh ;f"ka<£(S -& TkoL^k4^Sk^.__k<*-d </jcuv4&rf To fti# fee, a h o T k e P /nove, t W a /n r >w~ p Q a & T l\

P.lfakec^ 6 h u tV w h \^ r t^ / S& s (l& C a lled , a n d a ^ rk z c t -fe

CLH\c4fa£f f l r f e t id (jOkCfe K e f ^/gc// Ou4^ Lrti ^ /jku\C £

j p a S CtQ iV \d QsA.S gocft 4

^ycPkccLf k c c i cU sg e x p re s s e d T > tu # i W ^ JV tg ._/^ ^ i^ e h e o e e f^

T o foaue. /n aJif . i rh ^ f\4n\)& A u T & f h e r 4v~ \M {d

k ooS^^CN^d t f l fa "tW ^ p [a jt. <Ch& L 'T ry ’-f~ fo n ii ) [p k C f^

a\Ad h e y c io x ijL f r e ^ a To S ix ^fk. ^K o / a J- p n a , _________

( T ^ W t o f t j u ^ e W o ) ______ _ ? J>£(sttzJrt) u J ^ Y -

Page 98: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-031277_0 43252977 'NF

09-09-u

FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

am. SEP 08 2m pm-PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON KEVIN STOCK, County Clerk

‘ BY__________ ________ DEPUTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF. WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY

IN RE:O v U c l Y W

Petitioner/P 1 aintiff,Vs.

LcwsoV]Respondent/Defendant.______________________

O-v s Vt* <Au

) No. m 3 - ' Q 3 \ c n - ' 0) r ) i (Document Title)

) l D - H t iy W H iJ T w ( n ))! ■ ------

Dated thi:his ^ day o f 20_Vj^

2007.documcnl.covereheet.doc

Page 99: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

, b - •

. o \ - V ; 0 > ’ :w . ■ - -v . a *■

' *2 : '*7?*?- ■ro - - ' CJ •._iJV *< .{Di . - ■■, 7 -':>■=? “ 5 , .- A '

i| -VC 'i7-VV. ,• '3 ' '‘‘rtV ►’ r* ►

* 3 ^ v :• •;, ■■ CT * '•■ ;3 ..J 1 -

-- ;"*■-"a—”■ *r~r?r?rv ^ V v ‘-.■■v i r

k . .

, > i - \V . • \ N ^

to .■ * t A <•'•'• & v ■■*; ■ j - .*' ~

S'J-m-jfei , y ■

- k " . '

.<'•“ r yv?;*'

». M 11 ".£, / V ' / > " t' '

u ‘ ■ "A\ rt-,

6-f* ' * '-■ **V% "V-' ' A ■ ■• - . i

- , ■ ■ ■ .* ft ■

.■' ,1 't * ’ ■ B

'V j t t

-* * -■ 1c a -

■■ •

2 . '1 -i' V ■■■Vs'’X

' - !-

. V > V ' - ''

■A

V %

■j ^ '> T,* -- **^ ^ ' x - * <

- * f. * <4^ ii jf--*„ J , ^ - s' t *'-■?> i , *''■ '* V ‘* V ; - vV

: / ‘ : ■■ /■ - “ £ * ” ?;' '■' i. \~-t rv*r" ^

. ._ j-. • ---_ -■* :

; i ■*. 9

' l" ' Kl-j 4rjS 1

V/k? f j ■- ■ > </ i -- ’’*, ^ ‘r

—-«■—jy yyy-Tri1' ■ ■; ‘V-: 1 ’ 'v r r^ . ' V? V1 .‘V T: ' -k- -;," . ’ % V-- ^" - ' “ »= .• '■ * .-1. ■# , ' i n . i■■ . j ^ ’ / ; o *• ^ ^--'y ;y ■■ , r

<

• R 3

i / > ;

> « ■ >" ■ ^ O v

i w *

s

u » -?

?:■ .

V7 ;

t T :

A -

■ .j »Hk *■$Vjt 1

■ ■;r ::y / y . r -\ . - > § ; ,N#v , .. -. V,. yyyr--, ,rS; , , ■, i •’ V ' '■ ' - ' > , v; ,A. «--' f iv'- f - ’ '-’ V-vV1' ,W -a',, . -*j )';;V\:- r ;■> -t ‘l .. r1.1. ;j .;>Wv.y~ .^ ~. •■-'-’■-■w■■

■ V^v 'v

> 3 - A ' # B ? r ) 0 - - ' <s - ^• S ' ' % - ; o

.S3vv;,0» ■ C V >.. '7'- A ,‘,-J; V t ' ' A.

■| '^■',j'''1!SV,.-,i. X'-. jSiJ..-1 Ji' ^

>' * "aty-,v vv-i , - t -^-y. '•- ^ > i — r :' . , a (■»■-. J c «--/ •■

k . A ,V, vA‘ "* '

D CO

O ro n > o i o o

mCD

oCO

001K3O

CCOo

X -l

o

l

o

Page 100: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

( H - 3 - O W 7 - 0

ii’i

tJ FedissOffice.i j

September 05,201419:22 Receipt #: 0932542299 VISA #: XXXXXXXXXXXX7224 2014/09/05 19:07

Page: 1

i;1 Qty Descriptioni i ' l F

Amount

0) 19 ESB&WS/S White 8.5x11 2.28

SubTotal 2.28Taxes 0.21

. 4 , Total 2.49

Earn rewards with FedEx Office *■si Earn points for your eligible FedEx Office purchases

when you sign up for My FedEx Rewards. Go to O fedex.com/rewards to sign up today,H\ The Cardholder agrees to pay the Issuer of the charge (T; card in accordance with the agreement between the

Issuer and the Cardholder.

FedEx Office Print & Ship Centers

9400 Gravelly Lake Lakewood,WA 98499 (253) 983-9191 www.FedExOffice.com

Tell us how we're doing and receive 10% off your next $10 print order fedex.com/welisten or 1-800-398-0242 Offer Code:____Offer expires 12/31/14

Please Recycle This Receipt i

(Uke^ sV - t V X ^ ^ ;

CooV. & V

Page 101: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0 43252994 MTTMO 09-09-14

Superior Court of Washington County of

IN COUNTY ClI rK’S OFFICE

AM. SEP 08 2014 PM.PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON KEVIN STOCK, County Clerk BV______________ 'DEPUTY

’ T

u t Ct! In re Parentage:

(Vbiqou\Petitioner,

and . - ^

No. m - 3 - 0

Motion and Declaration for Temporary Order (MTAF)

(XjV\aCO^ Respondent. I.

I. Motion

ased on the reasons set fGV> Q v O

Ba^ed op the reasons se^forth in the declaration below, (name of requesting party)_______________ moves the court for a temporary order wh’ich:

orders child support as determined pursuant to the Washington State Child Supp^^t Schedule., approves the parenting plan which is proposed by .(name) <F) f restrains or enjoins (name) __ fO CoV^Vl CLV\ Speace of the other party or of any child.restrains or enjoins (name) '_____________________________

>qrt Schedule. \S rV frU lc ^ ' K a T C C X t O u J

^ ' from disturbing the

from going onto thegrounds of or entering the home, work place or school of the other party, or the day care or school of the following named children:

[ ] restrains or enjoins (name)_____________________________________________from knowinglycoming within or knowingly remaining within (distance)_____________ ____________of thehome, work place or school of the other party or the day care or school of the following children:

restrains or enjoins (name) [i I & tVVxGUVY ^ from assaulting, harassing, stalking, or molesting (name) )or the children, orusing, attempting to use, or threatening to use physical force against the protected party or the . children that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury, or engaging in other conduct that would place the protected party in reasonable fear of bodily injury to himself/herself or the children.

If the court orders this relief, and the restrained person and the protected person are spouse or former spouse, current or form domestic partner, parents of a child in common, or current or

Mtn/Decl for Temp Order (MTAF) - Page 1 of 4WPP PS 04.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - ROW 26.26.590

Page 102: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

former cohabitants as part of a dating relationship, then the restrained person may be

/prohibited from obtaining or possessing a firearm, other dangerous weapon, concealed pistol license, or ammunition under state or federal law for the duration of the order.

(If th is box is checked, you m ust complete paragraph 2.2 in the declaration below.) requires (name) N f ij t\ L i v t s . c M to surrender any firearm, otherdangerous weapon, and concealed pistol license in his or her immediate possession or control or

subject to his or her immediate possession or control .to the sheriff of the county having jurisdiction of this-proceeding, to his or her lawyer or to a person designated by the court,

restrains or enjoins (name) ____________ ;________________ from removing any of rhe

LJ

[]children from the state of Washington, requires (name)___________________professional fees and costs in the amount of $_

to pay temporary' attorney's fees, other to:

A^ o x / 'V S p c c iu d Ccofe. .

Dated:

appoints a-guardian ad iitom on behalf of the minor children.other: (^A nJ V iy O O b W \ v W o K n V l « fe V o V p G V 'lO .V 'lJ

cyViLv"! -Vo L - t h s o h . tO cvhGou/iVvctS c t v M W w c j cwicA ’i£> vmjV" £ \ju ^ ^ o u e c k 4 o o -

yW_______Iignatur# of Requesting Party or Lawyer/Wr\ . - / A _ n Sisnatur# of Requesi

W * f in p u GPrint or Type Name

Lawyer/WSBA No.

f2.a4-SC.-h 0 u )

2.1

II. Declaration

It is necessary that the court issue a temporary order granting the relief requested above for the reasons set forth below; - p

O n \u W xaR v l i h ' t s

M*! ArW w \j\ j u O\\j2-V\ JC \a JjL wj4 ~H c h -S tA

\ \& y < M aW W t r ^ o L c i ' s Vve, u x i$ W ' ^ h l u

\ C & X 'id . W e- s>4 f\\ w o g c b 4d h e oXA -e. ~ fo

C.cjuTj2 o w jT ( ) c K i x ^ W v f - , a d v iri-tifc j

-4o ^ > o V i(A o P & c & r W h c d K jl Vvfui bhcUA

A V e o t f i ' L - e r h o dcy \/J 2 y \ V \V v\ <x V?vo£ c h h c v ’u 7 jz \r “V fW j p

W cv-W L ArUJU- ^ \ s o d r i - A o u a q Y M j f ~M tn /D e c lfo r Temp O rde r (M TAF) - Page 2 o f 4 , ~ J *Aa ^ I ^ \*\ n AWPF PS 04.0100 M andato ry (06/2014) - R O W 26.26.590 \*> w V b f l c * ' V \ X iA

i p d V j U ^ v\Sa.!> c& 'W A k Ij \ \ d t e t d \ j c \

Page 103: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

2.2 If the surrender of firearms, other dangerous weapons, and concealed pistol license is requested,' please explain (check and complete all that apply):

l ] . Mas the other party used, display eel, or tiii cuLcueu iu use a urearni or other dangerous weapon in a felony? Describe:

[’] Has the other party previously committed an offense that makes him or her ineligible to possess a firearm under the provisions of RCW 9.41.040? Describe:

Does possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by the other party present a serious and imminent threat to public health or safety, or to the health or safetv of anv individual? Describe: ^ ^ ^ yOW T)

v i & v A W c ( x w j i z s i s } I , \y \ - ^ a M w j r i Y / d ' w W -

S u lJ - t-e x s 4 W a a T m u ' M . a i i o

V\ClS b eJ L v y

b u ^ r ' i S i u r t W l g f r L e J >

oA s D WaS clao o^rxcuuc :bvhbU M A 4- V\a3

■ ^ > a s - V . f \ 4 n s W s a - p e ^ h o

2.3 [ ] If the other party is not present and: VVtS 1 S> V\0^"a) is on active duty and is a National Guard member or Reservist residing in Washington,

Mtn/Decl for Temp Order (MTAF) - Page 3 of 4WPF PS 04.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW 26.26.590.

\ \i\ vwvi c-Wdd MW h y w w c U lV ' - K & t i i v t \sW V u l U i i l g b e - \ a s c > \ .

Page 104: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

orb) is a dependent o f a National Guard member or Reservist residing in Washington on active duty, list the reasons why this temporary order should be granted despite the absence of the other party:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.

naer penalty or perjury under me lav

Signed at (city) __ , (state) v a t * 1

Signature of Requesting Party ^ nt or Type Name

(date) ° V % -

Do n o t attach fin an c ia l reco rd s , p erso n a l health care records o r con fidentia l reports to this dec laration . Such records sh o u ld be served on the o th e r p arty a n d filed w ith the co u rt us ing o ne o f these co ver sheets:

1) Sealed Financial Source Docum ents (W PF DRPSCU 09.0220) for financial records2) Sealed Personal Health Care Records (W PF DRPSCU 09.0260) fo r health records3) Sealed Confidential R eport (W PF DRPSCU 09.270) for confidential reports

I f filed s ep ara te ly using a c o v e r sh eet, the records w ill be s e a le d to p ro tect yo u r p riv a c y (a lthough they w ill b e availab le to a ll parties in the case, th e ir attorneys, co u rt p erso n n e l a n d certa in state agencies and boards. See G R 22(C )(2).)

j-

Mtn/Decl for Temp Order (MTAF) - Page 4 of 4WPF PS 04.0100 Mandatory (06/2014) - RCW 26.26.590

Page 105: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1_

14-4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child ,NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,andSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent. I. II. III.

No. 14-3-03127-0

Temporary Order (TMO)

[] Clerk’s Action Required[ ] Law Enforcement Notification, ^3.1

I. Money Judgment Summary

Does not apply.

II. Basis

A motion for a temporary order was presented to this court and the court finds reasonable cause to issue the order.

III. Order

It is Ordered:

3.1 Restraining Order

The prior temporary restraining order restraining BOTH PARTIES dated AUGUST 14, 2014, remains in full force and effect.

Temp Order (TMO) - Page 1 of 2 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF DR 04.0250 Mandatory (06/2012) - RCW26,09.060;. 110;. 120;. 194, .300(2) FRALEY & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Temporary Order.dOCX Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 106: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

* i

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

VA

Temporary Relief

Ghild support ohall bo paid in accordance with tho order of child support, signed by the-eeurt.

Tho partioo-shall comply witl'i the Tempo!aiy Patenting Plan oignod by the court. ■

BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from removing any of the children from the state of Washington.

A yuurdijn ad'lilfcHirbhall be appointed on behalf Cf 'the rninoi childr- (&&&£(/&?/

3.3

3.4

Neither parent shall allow the child to have any contact with SCOTT FOMBY. m nTH & ZS K E & J iS f F o e F 6 MT)a/U $ ajC £ F F p rS F o O - /y £ /)£ /* S 6 TV B C fc g A JOT&Pyd Q£7Q&f<z (. 2 0 t9 .* Ph / lo /Aj/a toHn/oc/f x>

W I T H F a D i fA P F & HAOP. V f C / m n O r J L ^ J /h P O n F H fF ’ OH F ufJQAY F0o/*t / 0 - &7 a u p TV eC O frt A rjQ T h ird s t>/h> m p /A V-' 3 0 7T) F 'O Q P>r?.

W eiTHe/z p ftn r ? s h a l l d p /f x . f c c o h c l F O /t H /Y /FO ,Bond or Security T F C C H / t O SHflCC % £ S c H e o o F F o p p y c p / i £

F l io f/Y!po$£s J oy*£ rte n s u e F o f fP o fto ^ o n y 8 /tS B ODoes not apply O tf Co n t a c t U / W O B s e c m C - U /v a

A ^ £ fze .r t> F £ 'i y f * S 'F F " rz ' U A f i OtCYuCL^ THU <:& CO IF F FHF C /F /C -F ).Other v i tL y sso o f Payca/ if A h q faoya cO /lc P P y orfYC O P F *Fac/F PHaE/vr , small ftfivE /ZAnoopro ujEEYSc? o>Ac cj/fty F / SCQmPOYYFFFT # r F hpSSJZfapS <Z£FSFE/t

S f P C L F P y F o il THEy P o t fH f V P s <CHYL WStf&FHCS SHpCC 8£ /YlA/n/TAYA/ £ 0

Dated:

F<syz7>jFFL OF&FF+W. STEPHEN GRE Commissioner F

^ TVS ofU>&L h \ay Presented by:FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

Jod^/Commissionbt7 & * r( 3 t ize .« tf< s& > s-Q O N a / f £ ,/» &

Approved and agreed by: ™ M o o r 'S . Notice of presentation waived:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA"#3385b Attorney for Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this

F a, WSBA #

Attorney for Respondent

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is^ctual notice of this order.

Nathan

Temp Order (TMO) - Page 2 of 2WPF DR 04.0250 Mandatory (06/2012) - RCW 26.09.060; .110;. 120; Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Temporary Otter.dOCX

Sophi^-RtrtsehQW, Respondent

FILEDIN OPEN COURT

194, .3:£» 0 8 2014 59;

PIERCE COUNTY, Clerk

FAUBION, REEDER,:RALEY & COOK, P.S.

t0-100TH Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 107: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 1884 P. 1/2S e p . 8. 2 0 1 4 1 0 : 3 1 A M" 'H-

14-3-03127-0 43252999 RSUA

ENT ENTERatient Treatment Relapse Therapy Abuse Services

09 09 M jrmation School

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW, Suite 204 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 473-7474 Fax: (253) 474-9724

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET

To: Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization:D , , e : Q - i T -

Fax Number: 253-798-7214s

2 OFFICE

Re: SophiaRutschow DOB: 03-31-1981/Cause# 14-3-03127-0 SEP 0 8 2014 p m

/ / DICDPP r'OJmtt \ ». ;a: irliKifVTOt

1 1 Urgent X For Review^ .. KEVIN S 1 UCjL County C lerk,.

'Please-Comnient O Please Repty^

Notes/Comments:

sec. UlA re ^u tts .

f\

n n rm n c o n f id e n t ia l rrn rm nThis information has been disclosed to you from records whose confidentiality is protected by Federal Lm Federal regulations prohibit you

from making any further disclosure o f U without the specific written consent o f the person to whom it pertains or as olhenvise permitted by such regulation. A general uulhoriiatlou fo r the release o f medical Information Is not sufficient fo r this purpose. This information Is Intended only fo r the individual(s) named above. I f the reader o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver It to the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination o f lids information is prohibited. I f you have received this communication in error, please notify j<r by telephone and return the original message via the U.S. Postal Sendee and we will reimburse yon fo r any expenses Incurred.

Page 108: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

p n R 90 U 10-RUM N o. 1 8 8 4 P. - 2 / 2

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Patient RUTSCHOW, SOPHIA

Collected 9/312014 00:00 Received 9/5/2014 Reported 9/5/2014

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma, WA 96421 (253) 552-1551,fax (253) 552-1549

Specimen ID 103308419

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369381

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation Limit

AMPHETAMINES Negative 1000 ng/mLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ng/mLETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) POSITIVE 500 ngAnLETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dlOPIATES Negative 300 ng/mLMARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/mL

SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGCREATININE Normal 43.9 mg/dL > 20 mg/dlNITRITE Negative 500 mcgrtnLpH Normal 5,5 4 5 - 0 , 9

CommentsAll positive screening (esl resulls and semf-quantitalive values obtained from a screening test result should be considered presumptive until confirmed wllh a specific end sensitive alternate method such as GC/MS or LC/MS/MS.

CertificationCertified True and Complete

DANIEL IMHOFF. BS CERTIFYING SCIENTIST

(Signed out 9/5/2014) 8 2014

Final ReportFriday, SeptembarOS! 201410:48:14 AM

3004.0.0.33

Page 109: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Sep. 8. 2014 10:29AM No. 1881 P. 1/2

'NT EN TERtient Treatment elapse Therapy Abuse Services

donation School

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW, Suite 204Lakewood, WA 98499 in COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Phone:(253)473-7474

AM SEP 0 8 2 0 » p.m.Pl XVAoriiN6TONor KEVIN STOCK, County nfrfr (

Fax: (253) 474-9724

_ ~ ' ~ r—J/xPUTY

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET K

To: Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization: Date: i ^ j

Fax Number: 253-798-7214 J^tahPagesr'2

Re: Nathan Lensch DOB: 09-19-78 'Cause # 14-3-mTIXf^'

1 1 Urgent X For Review ["1 Please Comment Q Please Reply

S e e a t t a c h e d U J *

aJ £ 6 > .

nnnnn co nfide m e m rnimThis information has been disclosed ioyon from records whose confidentiality is protected by Federal Ltrw. Federal regulations prohibit yon

from 11 taling any further disclosure o f it without the specific written consent o f the person to whom ft pertains or ns cthenvhe permitted by such regulation. A general authorization fo r the release o f medical Information is not sufficient fo r this purpose. This information is intended only fo r the Individuals) named above. I f the reader o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver It to the recipient Is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination o f this information is prohibited. I f you it me received this communication in error, please notify us by ietepiicne and return the original via the U.S. Postal Service and we will reimburseyou fo r any expenses incurred.

Page 110: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

S e p . 3. 2 0 1 4 1 0 : 2 9 A M No. 1 3 8 1 P. 2 / 2

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Pallenl LENSCH, NATHAN

Collected 9/3/2014 00:00 Received 9/4/2014 Reported 9/5/2014

----------- 3 C 3 IC — —STERLING Reference Laboratories

2617 East L Street Tacoma, WA 98421

(253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

Specimen ID 103306422

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369380

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation Limit

AMPHETAMINES Negative IQOOngAnLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ngAnLETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) Negative 500 ng/mLETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dLOPIATES Negative 300 ng/mLMARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/ml

SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGCREATININE L 18.3 mg/dL > 20 mg/dL-Specific Gravity Normal 1.004 1.003-1.030NITRITE Negative 500 megrtmLpH Normal 6.5 4.5 - 8.9

St? 0 ip M

Final ReportFriday, September 0 6 ,2QM 2:16:39 AM

Page 111: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 1 883 P. 1/2Sep.. 8. 20 14 1 0 :30AM

14-3-03127-0 43253032 RSUA 09-09-14

'O

^NT ENTERitient Treatment .elapse Therapy Abuse Services

__jnnation School

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. S W, Suite 204 Lakewood, WA 98499

• Phone: (253) 473-7474 FILED Fax: (253) 474-9724N COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

a m SEP 08 2014 p,m .PIERCE COur-J i v vvnwriiNGTON

FACSIMILE TRANSMITT AT,r

.Cc UTY

To: Daniel Cook, Attorney at Law From: Lila Saucier

Organization:Date

Fax Number: 253-798-7214>JTotjciUPages: 2

Re: SophiaRutschow DOB: 03-31-198^ Cause# 14-3-03127-0 J

( v -1 1 Urgent X For Review \ | | Please Comment^ | Please Reply

Notes/Comments:

J \)q 5 T 6 >

nim nn c o n f id e n t ia l nnnnnThis information has been disclosed to yon from records whose confidentiality is protected by Federal Law. Federal regulations prohibit yon

from making any further disclosure o f It without the specific written consent o f the person to whom it pertains or as otherwise permitted by such regulation. A general authorization fo r the release o f medical information Is not sufficient for this purpose. This Information is Intended only for the iiitlividual(s) named above. I f the reader o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the recipient is not the intended recipient, j on are hereby notified that any dissemination o f this,information is prohibited. I f you have received this communication in error, please notify us Ai1 telephone and return the original message via (he U.S. Postal Sendee and we will reimburse you fo r any' expenses incurred:

Page 112: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 1 8 8 3 P. 2 / 2

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Patient RUTSCHOW, SOPHIA

Collected 9/3/2014 00:00 Received 9/6/2014 Reported 9/6/2014

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma, WA 98421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253} 552-1549

Specimen ID 103308419

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369381

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB

y>

(si Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation LimitAMPHETAMINES Negative iooQng/mLBENZOD1A2EPINES Negative 200 ng/hiLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ng/hnL

,.1, ETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) POSITIVE 500 hg/mLH ETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dL0 OPIATES Negative 300 ng/mL(si MARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/ml

O SPECIMEN VALIDITYTESTINGCREATININE ' Normal 43.9 mg/dL > 20 mg/dLNITRITE Negative SQOmcgAnL

il’i pH Norma) 5.5 4.5 - 8.9

CommentsAll positfve screening test results and semf-quantilaltve values obtained from a screening lest result should be considered presumptive until confirmed with a specific and sensitive alternate method such as GC/MS or LC/MS/MS.

CertificationCertified True and Complete

DANIEL IMHOFF. 0S CERTIFYING SCIENTIST

(Signed oulS/5/2014)

ENTERED

Final ReportFriday, SepTemb rO 201410:48:14 AM

3001 .0.0.33

Page 113: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

X fc n i 'g l C b = fr - -Pco ”2 e _For Petitioner

RE: 1 re? f>g3 ts

For Respondent

Gl Q & rh /v j& n cjp - y .> ' ' t W r crtt p ^ r t f g ^

f l A r to .5 OJArV /f> f\iJ _ -pa f& r c> A'-Ay, -pV e^ X o c j^ ^ o . / r r ^

AQv T~~_t Y

1 3 c ry rh A y ,/^ .

September 8, 2014 9:00 AM

(D <-£>7^-

Motion - Temporary Order

W. STEPHEN GREGORICH

Clerk: (~ % J T 0

Courtroom number: 117Calendar:C2 - SHOW CAUSE/FAMILY LAW

Run date/time 09/08/14 7:59

Ixcrtrpt.pbl dJournal_entry_showcause_report

Page 114: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

i.r.___ a a,i _j___ ^ r\ h h * _ ______lo. 1979 P. 2

[■■■.., ' 14-3-03127-0 43297746 RSUA 09-17-14 >UNTYSLICK'S OFFICE

FINAL REPORTReferred By _______ ^

Agency Name ^J3tO§SROADS TRTIVlTPatient 'LENSCH1 NATHAN

CoilectecKamim.Received 9/11/2014 Reported 9/12/2014

a m SEP 1 6 20t<

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma, WA 98421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

PIERCE ooui KEVIN §T(iTta-

feSriiNGTON*ounty C&ftcimen ID 103308393

!! DEPUTY

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369380

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB 0 5 / 2 1 - 0

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation Limit

AMPHETAMINES Negative 1000 ngrtnLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ng/hiLETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) Negative 500 ng/hiLETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dL

0 OPIATES Negative 300 rtg/inL0'j MARIJUANA METABOLITE Negative 20 ng/ml

n SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGH CREATININE Normal 98.2 mg/dL > 20 mg/dL

NITRITE Negative 500 mcg/mLPH Normal 7.6 4.5-8.9

,5 fPMPl

Final ReportFdday, September 12,201412240:43 AM '

3004.0.0.3]

Page 115: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGT(

September 23 2014 11:57 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), COVERPAGE FORNATHAN E. LENSCH, POLICE REPORTS

Petitioner,and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

COMES NOW attorney for Petitioner, Daniel N. Cook, and presents to the court the

attached Police Reports on file with the Law Enforcement Support Agency and which were

received in response to a subpoena.

DATED this of September 2014. FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

Daniel N. CookTWSEA^3^866Of Attorneys for Petitioner

Coverpage for Police ReportsLensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1 \Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Police Reports.docx

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25

Lakewood, WA 98499 253-581-0660

Page 116: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Lakewood Police Department Incident No. 133320095.1 Page 1 of 5

Arrest Report_____________________________ ____________ ___ _____PDA: Yes Homeland Security: Subject: simple Assault | DV | Misd | Arrest

w o£ 5:

IBR Disposition: Arrest Case Management ACTV - Active Disposition:

o CD o 3 toForensics: Reporting By/Date: L13176 - Eastman, Skylar 11/28/2013 01:58:00 .“ z

Case Report Status: Approved Reviewed By/Date: LD04092 - Stewart, Thom 11/28/2013 07:22:28 O

Related Cases:Case Report Number Agency

Non-Electronic AttachmentsAttachment Type Additional Distribution Count

Location Address: 9106 59th Ave Sw Location Name:City, State, Zip: Lakewood, WA 98499 Cross Street:

Contact Location: City, State, Zip:Recovery Location: City, State, Zip:

CB/Grid/RD: 237 - LAKEWOOD District/Sector: |_D04 - Lakewood (Lakeview)Occurred From: 11/28/2013 01:58:00 Thursday Occurred To:

Notes:

Offense Details: 1319 - Assault - Nonaggravated (Simple) FamilyDomestic Violence: Yes Child Abuse: No Gang Related: No/Unknown Juvenile:

Completed: Completed Crime Against: PE Hate/Bias: None (No Bias)Criminal Activity: Using:

Location Type: Single Family Residence Type of Security: Tools:Total No. of Units

Entered:Evidence Collected: Photographs

EntranceCompromised:Entry Method:

Suspect Description:Suspect Actions:

Notes:

Arrestee A1: Rutschow, Sophia Alexandrea PDA:Aliases:

DOB: Height:

Address: City, State Zip:

3/31/1981 Age: 325 ' 7 " Weight: 125

9106 59TH Ave Sw Lakewood, WA 98499

Sex: Female Race: White Hair Color: Blonde/strawberry

County:Country:

(JtS^Hispanic

^1^253-590-7973

Call Source: Phone Report:

Insurance Letter: Entered On:

Approved On: Adult/ Juvenile Clearance:

Additional Distribution: Validation Processing

Dispatched

11/28/2013 06:34:15 11/28/2013 07:43:13

Distribution Date:

By:

Exception Exceptional Cle

Other* County Pros. Atty.

City Pros. Atty. Military

F o r Law Enforcem ent Use O n ly - No Secondary D issem ination A llow edRecords has the authority to ensure correct agency, CB/Grid/RD, and District/Sector are incorporated in the report______________________________________________________________________

Supervisor:

Printed: 11/28/2013 07:43:13Printed By: E73858 - Rehse, Sherry

Page 117: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Lakewood Police Department Arrest Incident No. 133320095.1 Page 2 of 5

ReportOther Address: Other Phone:

Resident: Full - Time Resident Occupation/Grade: Employer/School:

SSN: 541-02-7142 DOC No: FBI No:State ID: Local CH No:

Driver License No: RUTSCSA196DU Driver License State:

Washington Driver License Country:

United States of America

Hair Length: Glasses: Facial Hair:Hair Style: Teeth: Facial Shape:Hair Type: Speech: Complexion:

Appearance: Right/Left Handed: Facial Feature Oddities:

SMT: Distinctive Features:Attire: Body Build:

Gangs: Tribe Affiliation:Significant

Trademarks:Identifiers:

Suspect Pretended to Be:

Modus Operandi

Place Of Birth: Habitual Offender: Custody Status:Date/Time Arrested: 11/28/2013 02:15:00 Booked Location: Date/Time Booked:

Arrest Location: Released Location: Held For:Arrest Offense: 1319 - Assault - Nonaggravated (Simple) Family Date/Time

Released:Arrest Type: On-view Booked - New Probable Cause Juvenile Disposition:Armed With: Unarmed Adult Present

Name:Miranda Read: Yes Miranda Waived: No Detention Name:No. Warrants: Muiti. Clearance: Not Applicable Notified Name:

Fingerprints: Photos: No Previous Offender:Type of injury: Fire Dept Response:

Hospital Taken To: Medical Release Obtained:

Taken By:

Attending Physician: Hold Placed By:

New ChargesArrest # Book/Cite Charge Description - RCW/Ordinance Free Text Charge Court Bail Count

Description000 Book M - - Misdemeanor Lakewood 1

____ Assault/DV- - __________ Municipal Court ____

W arrants_________ _____________________ _______ ____ _l Arrest# ! Warrant# | Free Text Charge Description__ ] Agency Court Bail

Arrest Notes:

Probable Cause: v i and W ljr ta te d A1 threw an alarm clock a t V i's face, striking him in the lip.

Weapon i : OtherOffense: 1319 - Assault - Nonaggravated

(Simple) FamilySerial No:

Offender: OAN:Weapon: Other Automatic:

Other Weapon: alarm clock Caliber:Action: Gauge:

Manufacturer: Length:Make: Finish:

Importer: Grips:Model: Stock:

For Law Enforcement Use O n ly- No Secondary Dissemination Allowed printed: n/XB/zuid u/:4 b:jjP rinted By: E73858 - Rehse, Sherry

Page 118: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Lakewood Police Department Arrest Incident No. 133320095.1 Page 3 of 5

ReportWeapon Notes:

Victim V1: Lensch, Nathan Edward_______________________________________ PDA:Aliases:

DOB: 9/19/1978 A9e: 35 Sex: Male Race: White Ethnicity: Non-HispanicHeight: 6'1" Weight: 220 Hair Color: Eye Color: Hazel

Address: 9106 59TH Ave Sw County: Phone: 253-273-2259City, State Zip: Lakewood, WA 98499 Country: Business Phone:Other Address: Other Phone:

Resident: Full - Time Resident Occupation/Grade: Employer/School:SSN: 620-09-3542 Place of Birth:

Driver License No: LENSCNE2270R Driver License Washington State: 3

Driver License Country:

United States of America

Attire: Complexion:SMT: Facial Hair:

Victim Of: 1319 - Assault - Nonaggravated (Simple) Family Facial Shape:Victim Type: Individual Circumstances: Weapon Used:

Injury: 05 - Apparent Minor Injury/Complaint of Minor Pain

Testify: Reporting Statement Obtained:

No

Type of Injury: cut lip Fire Dept Response:Hospital Taken To: Medical Release

Obtained:Taken By:

Attending Physician: Hold Placed By:

Victim Offender RelationshipsOffender: Relationship:A1 - Rutschow, Sophia Victim Was BoyfriendAlexandrea

LawEnforcement

Type: Justifiable HomicideAssignment: Circumstances:

or Assaulted Information

Activity:

Victim Notes:

Witness W1: Lensch, Abigail LAliases:

DOB: 11/3/2007 A9e: 06 Sex: Female Race: W h ite Ethnicity: Non-HispanicHeight: Weight: Hair Color: Eye Color:

Address: 9106 59th Ave Sw County: Phone:City, State Zip: Lakewood, WA 98499 Country: Business Phone:Other Address: Other Phone:

Resident: Full - Time Resident Occupation/Grade: Employer/School:SSN: Place Of Birth:

Driver License No: Driver License Driver LicenseState: Country:

Attire: Complexion:

SMT: Facial Hair:Testify: Facial Shape:

Witness Notes:

For Law Enforcement Use O nly- No Secondary Dissemination Allowed Printed: 11/28/2013 07:43:13Printed By: E73858 ■ Rehse, Sherry

Page 119: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Lakewood Police Department Arrest Incident No. 133320095.1 Page 4 of 5

ReportProperty Item No. 1/1:1323 - Evidence - Photo / Audio / Video / Data - CD / DVD / Blu-Ray Disc Officer Generated

Other Common Item: Photographed:Description: Fingerprinted:

Quantity: 1 Contents Sampled:Finding Location: Owner:

Status: E - Evidence (Including Other Seized Property And Tools)

Value:

Recovered Date: Make./Brand:Recovered Value: Model:

Field Tested: Serial No:Field Test Results: OAN:

Propeny Disposition: Booked into Property insurance Company:Disposition Location: Lakewood Police Policy No:

Vehicle Information:License: Locked:

License State: Keys in Vehicle:License Country: Delinquent Payment:

Vehicle Year: Victim Consent:Make: Drivable:Model: Estimated Damage:

Vehicle Style: Damage:Primary Vehicle Color: Damaged Area:

Secondary Vehicle Color: Tow Company:VIN: Tow Consent:

Special Features: Hold Requested By:

Drug Information:Drug Type: Drug Measure:

Drug Quantity: Drug Measure Type:

Jewelry Information:Metal Color: Total# of Stones:Metal Type: Inscription:

Stone Color: Generally Worn By:

Firearm Information:Caliber: Length:Gauge: Finish:Action: Grips:

Importer: Stock:

Property Notes:

Enter Date Time WACIC LESA Initial ReleaseInfo.

Date Time ReleaseNo.

ReleaseAuthority

Clear OwnerNotified

Operators Name

Investigative InformationMeans: Motive:

Vehicle Activity: Direction Vehicle Traveling

Synopsis:

For Law Enforcement Use O nly-N o Secondary Dissemination Allowed P rin ted : 11/28/2013 07:43:13P rinted By: E73858 - Rehse, Sherry

Page 120: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Lakewood Police Department Arrest Incident No. 133320095.1 Page 5 of 5

ReportNarrative: On November 28, 2013 at approximately 0158 hours, Ofc Borchardt and I were dispatched to a

domestic at 9106 59th Ave SW. The reporting party, V1-Lensch, reported that his girlfriend threw an alarm clock at him and busted his lip open.

At approximately 0203 hours, I arrived on scene and met with Lensch outside of his residence. Ofc Bell and Ofc McCelelland went inside and met with the female, A1-Rutschow.

Lensch stated Rutschow has been drinking vodka and was heavily intoxicated. Lensch said Rutschow accused him of taking her cell phone battery and got angry.

According to Lensch he was laying in bed with his daughter, W1-Lensch, Abigail when Rutschow came into the room and threw an alarm clock at his face. The alarm clock was on the night stand next to the bed and Rutschow was approximately three feet from Lensch. Lensch said he got Rutschow out of the room and locked the bedroom door. Lensch then called 911.

While speaking with Lensch I observed his upper lip was cut and he was holding a white washcloth to his lip. The washcloth had several small spots of blood. Photographs Lensch's lip and the washcloth were entered into LPD evidence per departmental policy.

I contacted Ofc Bell to determine Rutschow's side of the story. Rutschow told the officers that she was arguing with Lensch and that he pushed her. Rutshcow said she threw something, possibly the "remote" at Lensch but she did not think it hit him. Ofc Bell said Abigail told him that Rutschow threw the alarm clock at Lensch while they were laying in bed. Every time Rutschow tried to pass blame onto Lensch, Abigail shook her head side to side and indicated that Rutschow wasn't being honest.

I placed Rutschow under arrest for Assault 4 DV and escorted her to my patrol car. Rutschow's balance seemed to be impaired and she tried to explain that Lensch has beat her in the past. I read Rutschow her Constitutional Rights from a department issued Miranda card and Rutschow originally statedshe was not going to talk to me but then started making spontaneous statements.

Lensch refused to fill out a written statement and was given a DV victim's rights pamphlet.

On the way to Nisqually jail, Rutschow was visibly upset and was worried that she wasn't going to be able to see a judge because of the holiday. Rutschow continued to explain that Lensch is bigger than her and has harmed her in the past. Rutschow said she was only defending herself.

Rutschow was booked into Nisqually jail without incident and that concluded my involvement in thisincident.

Reviewed By: Reviewed Date:

For Law Enforcement Use O n ly-N o Secondary Dissemination Allowed Printed: 11/28/2013 07:43:13P rinted B y: E73858 ■ Rehse, Sherry

Page 121: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

PROPERTY REPORT SEARCH WARRANT □

LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT

TYPE OF CRIME

DATE

PROPERTY ROOM USE ONLY

PAGE:*

s1

^EVIDENCE Q SAFEKEEPING

O FOUND LABORATORY WORK REQUIRED: YES.

0 OWNER UNKNOWN

RELATED CASE NO.

CENSUS DIST.B 3 7 SO

PROPERTY OBTAINED FROM: ADDRESS PHONES ST^TW

o>

LAST NAME FIRSTtTHnw

MIDDLE

J L _STREET ADDRESS CITY PHONE

^(OU g^TH- /V lLS;- , L.iA-v.z 00 uj K\

[3LU-3ffl3w

ST NAME FIRST MIDDLE

STREET ADDRESS CITY PHONE

PROPERTY INVENTORY

ITEM NO. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOC. F/O QTY. SERIAL NO. LOCATION DISPOSITION

1 J/4oto c y c . s < ^ r

PROPERTY ROOM USE ONLY

PROPERTY SUBMITTED BY:.. 0 , (T.lA'S V\ l-> UNIT NO.. U L \ 1 C .DATE.

ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION OR COMMENTS:

S s.s ^ PROPERTY RECEIVED: METHOD « n < DATE Ip' ? " Y 3 '2 z cc o0. Illo «DC 3 Q.

PROPERTY INVENTORIES BY:

w

UNIT NO. DATE

Z-243 (4/07)

Page 122: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

S e P; 2 2 . 2 0 1 4 2 : 4 3 P M No. 2 0 3 5 P. 1 / 1

14-3-03127-0 43334292

1ENT ENTER(patient Treatment l Relapse Therapy x Abuse Services

-j-uconoi'Drug Information School

09-24-14

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW, Suite 204 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone:(253)473-7474Fax: (253) 474-9724 ,N COUNTY ClI rK'S OFF/

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTALam. SEP 2 3 2014WPICfi,ack i,^ r;fi0N

---- rcpi ITV

To: Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization: Date: — -v _ ,V l ~ ) M

Fax Number: 253-798-7214 Total Pages; /

Re: Sophia Rutschow DOB: 03-31-1981 Cause# 14-3-03127-0

1 | Urgent X For Review | | Please Comment Q Please Reply

Notes/Comments: .Tf CCLlied Opl\APv_ i-Ty "(-W ex. U-A crr\

o& q:00 a.rw S'Kii cLiJ ncrfU y t i t f l h - ^ c x g o u C o o U -

cm TlturscW g, lea fiaq cuno&esm e s s a g e . J t v i c L J r \ o i - l a T V

a

n n rm n c o n f id e n t ia l n n n n tiThis Information has been (Its closed to you from records whose confdenliaUty Is protected by Federal Lmv. Federal regulations prohibit you

from making any further disclosure o f U without the specific written consent o f the person to whom It pertains or as otherwise permitted by such regulation. A general authorization fo r the release o f medical information is not sufficient for this purpose This Information fs intended only fo r the indmdualft) named above. J f (he render o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the recipient Is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination o f (his it formation Is prohibited. Ifyo n lume received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone and return (he original message via the U.S. Postal Service and we wilt reimburse you for any expenses Incurred.

Page 123: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

''"•c ■'ptt. 2 2 . 2 0 1 4 2 : 3 6 P M No. 2 0 3 3 P. 1

!

c b o s c d o at»s _tw itatm ENT ENTER\itpatient Treatment

Relapse Therapy ice Abuse Services information School14-3-03127-0 43334294 RSUA 09-24-14

Lakewood10828 Gravelly Lake Dr. SW, Suite 2 ^ Lakewood, WA 98499 IN COUN Phone: (253) 473-7474 Fax: (253) 474-9724 a M

BY.

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET

K*$ OFFICE

3 2014 P.M.Pi||^|C0U!Nj.l WASHINGTON

STOCK, County Clerk.DEPUTY'

To: Pierce County Superior Court From: Lila Saucier

Organization: D,te: q ~ £ 2 - W

Fax Number: 253-798-7214 Total Pages: 2

Re: Nathan Lensch DOB: 09-19-78 Cause# 14-3-03127-0

I | Urgent [ X ] For Review | | Please Comment Q Please Reply

Notes/Comments: ,O M C X C A zd F e s u l 5

/bit n eg*

nrrrmn confidential nnnnnThis information has been disclosed to you from records whose confdeiutallly is protected iv Federal Ltnw Federal regulations prohibit you

from making any further disclosure o f if without the specific written cotisenf o f the person to whom It pertains or as othem'ise permitted by such regulation. A general authorization fo r the release o f medical information is not sufficient fo r this purpose. This Information Is Intended only for the IndMdttalfs) named above. I f the reader o f this facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the recipient Is not the intended recipient, yon are hereby notified that any dissemination o f this information is prohibited. I f you hw e received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message via the U.S, Postal Service and we will reimburse you fo r any expenses Incurred.

Page 124: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 2 0 3 3 P. 2

IS,.,1

P FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Patient LENSCH, NATHAN

Collected 9/17/2014 00:00 Received 9/18/2014 Reported 9/18/2014

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

T acoma, WA 98421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

Specimen ID 103308370

External ID N/A Patient ID SRL1369380

Specimen Matrix Urine Patient SSN Patient DOB

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation Limit

AMPHETAMINES Negative 1000ngfinLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ngAnLETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) Negative 500 ng/ftiL

;/ ETHANOL Negative 20 mg/dL0 OPIATES Negalive 300 ngrtnL&l MARIJUANA METABOLITE . Negalive 20 ng/mL

si' SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGiM CREATININE Normal 92.7 mg/dL > 20 mg/dL

NITRITE Negative 500 mcgflmLiT; pH Normal 5.4 4.5-8.3

%

Final ReportSepfemcer 13, 201411:50:54 PM

3004.0,0,33

Page 125: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTO

September 26 2014 9:23 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAL LENSCH, No. f y - 3 - 0 3 / 2 7 - 0

NATHAN E. LENSCH,Child(ren),

DECLARATION OFPetitioner, NATHAN LENSCH

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

I, NATHAN LENSCH, make the following statement on the basis of my personal

knowledge. This is a reply declaration to the statements of SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

First, with respect to the incident when she called the police to my house. I was not

drunk. I drank beer while eating chicken wings and watching the Seahawks game while our

daughter ABBY was not in my care. I was not intoxicated. SOPHIA admits that the

Lakewood police officer did not think I was intoxicated. My attorney sent a subpoena to South

Sound 9-1-1 (formerly LESA records) and my attorney received other police reports involving

us but no police report was provided for the incident SOPHIA where SOPHIA admits in her

declaration the officer did not believe I was intoxicated. SOPHIA alleges that she was

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 1 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch2.doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100 th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 126: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

banging on the door and I would not wake-up. I do not believe that is true. SOPHIA is

confrontational and manipulative. I believe SOPHIA looked in the window and saw me asleep

and hoped to create a situation to make me look bad. I do not believe she knocked on the

door at all, or if she did, she did so only very quietly. I do get up early for work each day and I

had fallen asleep on the couch while watching the game. But I did hear ABBY knock on the

door and I immediately went and opened the door. When I did SOPHIA triumphantly

proclaimed to me “The police are on their way.” I believe she did not knock, or knocked

extremely quietly, to create a situation where she could try to make me look bad. And when

ABBY knocked on the door in a normal fashion, I immediately woke up and answered.

I am concerned about SOPHIA. She has had one positive UA for alcohol. She has

also had one no-show on her random UA so that must be considered positive. I believe

SOPHIA needs to continue taking random UAs until she has had clean UAs for at least 60

days. All of my UAs have been clean since ABBY came to live with me (the first UA was

positive for alcohol but that was from prior to ABBY coming to live with me). SOPHIA has

also always been at least an hour late to pick up ABBY for her visits. And the last Sunday

visit which was scheduled SOPHIA completely did not show up for. I believe she is drinking a

lot and is not ready to care for ABBY for extended periods of time.

ABBY is doing extremely well in school and daycare. I have also enrolled ABBY in an

after-school gymnastics class which she attends twice per week. ABBY is constantly

surrounded by mandatory reporters and I am aware of no concerns expressed by any of the

mandatory reporters. I also joined the PTA. ABBY and I are still living in the family home.

ABBY is sleeping in her ordinary bed and is comfortable in her surroundings.

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 2 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch2 doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 - 100th St. SW #25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 127: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

To the best of my knowledge SOPHIA is still couch surfing. If ABBY stayed overnight

with SOPHIA she would have to share a room with SOPHIA or the other two little girls in the

house. I understand that the individuals SOPHIA is living with are getting a divorce and I am

not sure that the situation is conducive to ABBY staying there for extended periods of time. If

SOPHIA has 60 days of clean random weekly UAs and does not no show for any more, than I

would not be opposed to ABBY spending every other weekend with her mother at this time.

As noted in my original parenting plan, I am not opposed to ABBY spending even more time

with SOPHIA than that, once SOPHIA has housing that is not couch surfing and is more

conducive to a longer stay. But for now, ABBY should reside primarily with me and continue

living in the family home where she is comfortable.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE

OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed at (city) Cl Ic £ t?A ( s t a t e ) o n (date) Z ^ - P i - ZJD

DECLARATION OF NATHAN LENSCH - Page 3 of 3S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Nathan Lensch2. doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.5920- 100th St. SW #25

Lakewood, WA 98499 253-581-0660

Page 128: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGT

September 26 2014 9:59 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,And

No. 14-3-03127-0

DECLARATION OF MAILING

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent. * 1

I, Sally DuCharme, am over the age of 18, and competent to testify in the above entitled case.

On September 26, 2014, I placed in the U.S. Mail a copy of the following documents in the above-entitled caption:

1. Sealed Personal Healthcare Records filed 09/11/2014;2. Temporary Order entered 09/08/21043. Police Reports4. Sealed Personal Healthcare Records filed 09/23/2014;5. Sealed Personal Healthcare Records filed 09/24/2014;6. Declaration of Nathan Lensch filed 09/26/2014.

Said documents were addressed to:

Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Mailing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 129: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

I declare, under the penalty of perjury and the Laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED September 26, 2014A/'rr-X-J---------

Sally DuCTiarme, Legal Assistant

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Mailing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 130: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

No. 2 0 9 5 P. 2 / 2__ l-J.I.P .M

10-02-14

FINAL REPORTReferred By

Agency Name CROSSROADS TRTMT CENTER Patient LENSCH, NATHAN

Collected 9/24/2014 00:00 Received 9/26/2014 Reported 9/26/2014

i

Specimen ID

External ID Patient ID

Specimen Matrix Patient SSN Patient DOB

STERLING Reference Laboratories2617 East L Street

Tacoma, WA 98421 (253) 552-1551 fax (253) 552-1549

'*/Co°«ry£fe0

10M083S0 4 * Cfc*N/A Pf§c£r ^ 0 pto ^SRL136938Urine

Test Name Result Quantitation Screen Limit Confirmation LimitAMPHETAMINES Negative 10QOng/mLBENZODIAZEPINES Negative 200 ng/mLCOCAINE METABOLITE Negative 300 ngfoiLETHYLGLUCURONIDE (ETG) Negative 500 ng/mLETHANOL Negalive 20 mg/dLOPIATES Negalive 300 ngAnLMARIJUANA METABOLITE Negalive 20 ng/ml

SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTINGCREATININE Normal 2S.9 mg/dL > 20 mg/dLNITRITE Negalive 500 mcgAnLpH Normal 7.2 4.5 - 6.9

W iw w i 2 a 20fe

y >

Final ReportFriday, September 25, Zyf 4 3;29;0S FNs

3004.0.0.3D

Page 131: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

NATHAN E LENSCH

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

10R COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGT(&NopJn^ S rtIN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY

No. 14-3-03127-0'Petitioner(s),

vs.

Respondent(s)

Memorandum of Journ

[ ] Show Cause

(ADM02)

OCT. 012014

NT3LC!

f e

PIERCE COUNTX-Clerk sPy-

depit

For Petitioner

RE: ^

A3

A CTTg-

For Respondent

3 &MOgic«=-__a W ( ( < ^ 1 ^ in -

CTTtfci. ( X 2a.rgf/TTT^ __ Gp-hp c g ^ f

3 > r K t..<2 3________ r fe __ W e -__ ^ * ^ ( a o Up I p J u a -o ' a

CH~ •'ijUfl.V (ry/OCy G>yL e> r(5 P ^^or\ /?>c, yc>SO^\l^ . ^W yxV^T

__-C lU o _^ c r eo c^3cr^,.r^s. .__________________________________

S^vU,_£geT\e.£__ _______ W W \ t P A S u ^ i ^ z ^cd W -Q c -x l^

iA jc a id ^__LAfa ^ S ^ i ^ / v A g ^ c>rfr Aa 'i& -TvQne^__________________

iU W ^A __T£.Cc^rrl tc? ^ > ^ e A t __ ._._.................. c*T(&<tn s

-^pes2/rh?3-_____________________________________________________________

3 ^ 3 v ^ /\ at

October 1,2014 9:00 AM

p l.z^ / / iv 'z S '

Motion - Temporary Order

Mark D Nelson

Clerk: y-< Z Z i2 _ < ~ p ~ a S ~ ~

Courtroom number: 117Calendar: C2 - SHOW CAUSE/FAMILY LAW

Rundate/time 10/01/14 7:58 '

Ixcrtrpt.pbl dJournal_entry_showcause_report

Page 132: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child , TEMPORARYNATHAN E. LENSCH, PARENTING PLAN

Petitioner, (PPT)andSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent.

This is a temporary parenting plan signed by the court.

It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed:

I. General Information

This parenting plan applies to the following children:

Name AgeABIGAIL LENSCH Age: 6

II. Basis for Restrictions

Under certain circumstances, as outlined below, the court may limit or prohibit a parent’s contact with the child and the right to make decisions for the children.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 1 of 10 FAUBION, REEDER,W PFPS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.076, FRALEY & COOK, P.S..181; .187; .194 ' 5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia Lakewood, WA 98499C:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc Phone* (253) 581-0660

Page 133: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2.1 Parental Conduct (RCW 26.09.191(1), (2))

Does not apply.

2.2 Other Factors (RCW 26.09.191(3))

Reserved.III. Residential Schedule

The residential schedule must set forth where the child shall reside each day of the year, including provisions for holidays, birthdays of family members, vacations, and other special occasions, and what contact the child shall have with each parent Parents are encouraged to create a residential schedule that meets the developmental needs of the child and individual needs of their family. Paragraphs 3.1 through 3.9 are one way to write your residential schedule. If you do not use these paragraphs, write in your own schedule in Paragraph 3.13.

3.1 Schedule for Child Under School Age

Does not apply.

3.2 School Schedule

See Paragraph 3.10 for requirements of both parents.

Upon enrollment in school, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother:

PHASE 1: This phase starts immediately and the child will reside with the mother from 4:30 or 5:30 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays and from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. every Sunday.

PHASE 2: This phase starts after the mother has completed her drug/alcohol evaluation and continues so long as she in compliance and making progress in any recommended treatment. In Phase 2 the child will reside with the mother from 4:30 or 5:30 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays and from 4:30 or 5:30 p.m. on Friday to 6:00 p.m. on Sunday every other weekend.

PHASE 3: This phase starts after the mother has completed her drug/alcohol evaluation and continues so long as she in compliance and making progress in any recommended treatment and after the mother has established safe, stable and long term housing for the child. In Phase 3 the child will reside with the mother and father equally in alternating week on/week off blocks with exchanges on Sunday at 6:00 p.m.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 2 of 10 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.016, FRALEY & COOK, P.S..181; .187; .194 5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia , Lakewood, WA 98499C:\Users\Lib2\Downioads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc Phone' (253) 581-0660

Page 134: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3.3 Schedule for Winter Vacation

The child shall reside with the father during winter vacation, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Winter Vacation shall be defined as commencing the day after school lets out for the Winter Vacation Break and concluding on the day before school resumes.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10,

In even numbered years, the mother shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. until December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In odd numbered years, the mother shall have the child from December 24th 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.In odd numbered years the father shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. and conclude on December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In even numbered years the father shall have the child from December 24th at 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.

3.4 Schedule for Other School Breaks

The child shall reside with the father during spring break, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Spring break with the mother even years.

3.5 Summer Schedule

Upon completion of the school year, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Same as school year schedule.

3.6 Vacation With Parents

Each parent shall have two weeks uninterrupted with the child for vacation during the summer months when the child are off from school.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Each parent shall notify the other parent in writing of his or her two weeks of vacation no later than May 1 of

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 3 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\DownIoads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 135: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8ili

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

each year. If there is a conflict in vacation dates the father’s choice will control in odd years and the mother’s choice will control in even years.

3.7 Schedule for Holidays

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10:

The residential schedule for the child for the holidays listed below is as follows:

With Mother With Father(Specify Year (Specify YearOdd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

New Year’s Day See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3Martin Luther King Day * *Presidents’ Day * *Memorial Day ★ *

Easter Odd EvenJuly 4th Even OddLabor Day * *

Veterans’ Day Odd EvenThanksgiving Day Even OddChristmas Eve See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3Christmas Day See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3

Holidays marked with an asterisk (*) shall be spent with the parent who is entitled tothe adjoining weekend.

Holidays shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Holiday at 8:00 p.m.

3.8 Schedule for Special Occasions

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10:

The residential schedule for the child for the following special occasions (forexample, birthdays) is as follows:

With Mother With Father(Specify Year (Specify YearOdd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

Mother’s Day EveryFather’s Day EveryHalloween Even OddChild’s Birthday Odd Even

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 4 of 10 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, FRALEY & COOK, P.S..181; .187; .194 5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia Lakewood, WA 98499C:\Users\Lib2\Downioads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 136: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7I

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

If the Special Occasion is on a non-school day, the Special Occasion shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Special Occasion at 8:00 p.m.

If the Special Occasion is on a school day, the Special Occasion shall be from after school on the day of the Special Occasion until the8:00 p.m. on the day of the Special Occasion.

3.9 Priorities Under the Residential Schedule

Paragraphs 3.31 - 3.8, have priority over paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2, in the following order:

Rank the order of priority, with 1 being given the highest priority:2 holidays (3.7) 4 school breaks (3.4)1 special occasions (3.8) 6 summer schedule (3.5)3 winter vacation (3.3) 5 vacation with parents (3.6)

3.10 Restrictions

ALCOHOL USE

Neither parent is to consume any alcohol whatsoever during the pendency of this temporary parenting plan. This prohibition may be reviewed after completing of the drug/alcohol evaluation or treatment.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL EVALUTION WITH PARENTING ASSESSMENT

Both parents shall complete a drug and alcohol evaluation with parenting assessment/component, which shall include collateral contacts with the other party, and shall complete any follow-up treatment recommended by the evaluation. The parents shall use the same treatment provider for their evaluation. The parents are encouraged to use Crossroads or Doorway to Recovery in Lakewood because of geographic considerations, but any state certified agency that provides a drug/alcohol evaluation with a parenting component is permissible. A sliding fee scale shall be given higher priority than geographic considerations. The mother shall select the provider within 14 days of entry of this order; if she has not selected a provider within 14 days than the father shall select the provider and the mother will use the provider selected by father.

Both parents shall sign an authorization for release of information to the other parent for all assessments and records (including all UA results) for the treatment ordered above. Both parents shall also arrange to have any and all progress reports filed directly with the court and sent directly to the other parent.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 5 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Ub2\Downioads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 137: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

REVIEW

Either parent may bring a review of this temporary parenting plan if the other parent does not comply with the drug/alcohol evaluation requirement, or if they drug/alcohol evaluation raises serious concerns, or if the other parent is not in compliance or making progress in treatment.

Also, this case may be brought back for review by either parent if the parents cannot agree upon what is considered safe, stable and long-term housing as required for the mother to progress to Phase 3.

3.11 Transportation Arrangements

Transportation costs are included in the Child Support Worksheets and/or the Order of Child Support and should not be included here.Transportation arrangements for the child, between parents shall be as follows:

The receiving parent picking up the child at the start of his or her residential time.

3.12 Designation of Custodian

The child named in this parenting plan are schedule to reside the majority of the time with the father. This parent is designated the custodian of the child solely for purposes of all other state and federal statutes which require a designation or determination of custody. This designation shall not affect either parent’s rights and responsibilities under this parenting plan.

3.13 Other

Both parents shall provide a safe, sanitary home for the child at all times.

Both parents shall provide adequate bedrooms for the child to sleep in a comfortable home environment that is not crowded.

Both parents shall refrain from use of all illegal drugs or prescription medication except as directed by a physician with a lawful prescription.

Neither parent shall transport, nor allow any other individual to transport, the child in a vehicle except with by a driver with a valid driver’s license, in an insured vehicle and using all lawful child safety restraints.

3.14 Summary of RCW 26.09.430 - .480, Regarding Relocation of a Child

This is a summary only. For the full text, please see RCW 26.09.430 through26.09.480.

If the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time plans to move, that person shall give notice to every person entitled to court ordered time with

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 6 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 138: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

the children.

If the move is outside the children’s school district, the relocating person must give notice by personal service or by mail requiring a return receipt. This notice must be at least 60 days before the intended move. If the relocating person could not have known about the move in time to give 60 days’ notice, that person must give notice within 5 days after learning of the move. The notice must contain the information required in RCW 26.09.440. See also form DRPSCU07.0500, (Notice of Intended Relocation of A Child).

If the move is within the same school district, the relocating person must provide actual notice by any reasonable means. A person entitled to time with the child may not object to the move but may ask for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

Notice may be delayed for 21 days if the relocating person is entering a domestic violence shelter or is moving to avoid a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to health and safety.

If information is protected under a court order or the address confidentiality program, it may be withheld from the notice.

A relocating person may ask the court to waive any notice requirements that may put the health and safety of a person or a child at risk.

Failure to give the required notice may be grounds for sanctions, including contempt.

If no objection is filed within 30 days after service of the notice of intended relocation, the relocation will be permitted and the proposed revised residential schedule may be confirmed.A person entitled to time with a child under a court order can file an objection to the child’s relocation whether or not he or she received proper notice.

An objection may be filed by using the mandatory pattern form WPF DRPSCU07.0700, (Objection to Reiocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule). The objection must be served on all persons entitled to time with the children.

The relocating person shall not move the child during the time for objection unless: (a) the delayed notice provisions apply; or (b) a court order allows the move.

If the objecting person schedules a hearing for a date within 15 days of timely service of the objection, the relocating person shall not move the child before the hearing unless there is a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to the health or safety of a person or a child.

IV. Decision Making

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 7 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 139: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4.1 Day-to-Day Decisions

Each parent shall make decisions regarding the day-to-day care and control of each child while the child is residing with that parent. Regardless of the allocation of decision making in this parenting plan, either parent may make emergency decisions affecting the health or safety of the children.

4.2 Major Decisions

Major decisions regarding each child shall be made as follows:Education decisions fatherNon-emergency health care fatherReligious upbringing father

4.3 Restrictions in Decision Making

Sole decision making shall be ordered to the father for the following reasons:

One parent is opposed to mutual decision making, and such opposition is reasonably based on the following criteria:

(a) The existence of a limitation under RCW 26.09.191;(b) The history of participation of each parent in decision making

in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a);(c) Whether the parents have demonstrated ability and desire to

cooperate with one another in decision making in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a); and

(d) The parents’ geographic proximity to one another, to the extent that it affects their ability to make timely mutual decisions.

V. Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this dispute resolution process is to resolve disagreements about carrying out this parenting plan. This dispute resolution process may, and under some local court rules or the provisions of this plan must be used before filing a petition to modify the plan or a motion for contempt for failing to follow the plan.

Disputes between the parties, other than child support disputes, shall be submitted to (list person or agency):

mediation by Pierce County Dispute Resolution Center.

The cost of this process shall be allocated between the parties as follows:50% petitioner; 50% respondent

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 8 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 140: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8!

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The dispute resolution process shall be commenced by notifying the other partyby written request via certified mail:

In the dispute resolution process:

(a) Preference shall be given to carrying out this Parenting Plan.(b) Unless an emergency exists, the parents shall use the designated process

to resolve disputes relating to implementation of the plan, except those related to financial support.

(c) A written record shall be prepared of any agreement reached in counseling or mediation and of each arbitration award and shall be provided to each party.

(d) If the court finds that a parent has used or frustrated the dispute resolution process without good reason, the court shall award attorneys’ fees and financial sanctions to the other parent.

(e) The parties have the right of review from the dispute resolution process to the superior court.

VI. Other ProvisionsThere are no other provisions.

VII. Declaration for Proposed Parenting Plan

(Only sign if this is a propose$~parfenting plan.) I declare under penalty of pen under the laws of the§tate"ofWashington that thisjatairhas been proposed good faith and tbaftfie statements in Part II ofotffslPlan are true ant * VIII.

NatjjarfCensch, Petitioner Date and Place&f Signature

VIII. Order by the Court

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the parenting plan set forth above is adopted and approved as an order of this court.

WARNING: Violation of residential provisions of this order with actual knowledge of its terms is punishable by contempt of court and may be a criminal offense under RCW 9A.40.060(2) or 9A.40.070(2). Violation of this order may subject a violator to arrest.

When mutual decision making is designated but cannot be achieved, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the issue through the dispute resolution process.

If a parent fails to comply with a provision of this plan, the other parent’s obligations

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 9 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 141: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

under the plan are not affected.

Dated: [ 0 ^ 1 ( ( 4 _____________ I K '9 Judge/Commissioner

Presented by:FAUBIOhLEEEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

.Approved-ai id agieud by.Notice of presentation waived:

' A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:A signature belowJs actual notice of this order.

Nathan Lensch, Petitioner

__________________, WSBA #_____Attorney for Respondent

7~&Approved and-agfeed-by:A signature below factual notice of this order.

V s -Sophia Rutschow/Respondent

Parenting Plan {PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 10 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaC:\Users\Lib2\Downloads\Temporary Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 142: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

!

1

2 'i\

3

4

5

6

7

8

9l10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child , Temporary OrderNATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,(TMO)

and [ ] Clerk’s Action Required [] Law Enforcement Notification, f

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW, 3.1Respondent.

Does not apply.

I. Money Judgment Summary

II. Basis

A motion for a temporary order was presented to this court and the court finds reasonable cause to issue the order.

III. Order

It is Ordered.

3.1 Restraining Order

The prior temporary restraining order restraining BOTH PARTIES dated AUGUST 14, 2014, rennaing in fllli fnrpQ anri-affart

BY THi STemp Order (TMO) - Page 1 of 2 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF DR 04.0250 Mandatory (Q6J2012) - RCW 26.09.060; .110;. 120;. 194, .300(2) FRALEY & COOK, P.S.Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia 5920-1 00th Street SW, Ste 25S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Temporary Order.dOCX Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 143: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

i

Child support shall be paid as follows:Tftfltuxedl is tA rs s is

7T) f& f rtQfc' f=D£t£t</5'O r nnoV-/&2. /?vo 7^15? £V F/9Th£>£*

The parties shall comply with the Temporary Parenting Plan signed by the court.

3.2 Temporary Relief

BOTH PARTIES are restrained and enjoined from removing any of the children from the state of Washington.

A-guardian ad litem shall bo appointed on-bohal f of tho minor rhild.

Presented by:FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:Notice of presentation waived:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

__________________, WSBA #Attorney for Respondent

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Nathanxensch, Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:A signature belowjs actual notice of this order.no a__SopHia Rutscl^Wr-Re^peflaent

Temp Order (TMO) - Page 2 of 2WPF DR 04.0250 Mandatory (06/2012) - RCW 26.09.060; .110;. 120;. 194, .300(2)Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Temporary OrderdOCX

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920-100™ Street SW, Ste 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 144: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

Il14-3-03127-0 43418286 LTR7 10-07-14

(253) 798-3654 FAX (253) 798-7214

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY

i 334 County-City Building 930 Tacoma Avenue South

Tacoma, Washington 98402-2102

DATED: October 6, 2014

Re: Cause No. 14-3-03127-0 Docket code: CRRSPNATHAN E LENSCHvs.SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Dear Counsel or PRO SE (Self-Represented):

Court records indicate that the attorneys arid/or parties listed below have failed to comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department in regard to the following item:

Sealed Acknowiedgment/Denial of Paternity - Not Filed Deadline: 09/30/14\

Pursuant to Pierce ;County Local Rules and also pursuant to the Case Scheduling Order or Order Assigning Case to Department given to you at the time of filing this case, you are out of compliance. Please take the actions necessary to immediately comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department. Please file and deliver a courtesy copy of the document to the Judge.

If the court finds that an attorney or party has failed to comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department and has no reasonable excuse, the court may order the attorney or party to pay monetary sanctions to the court, or terms to any other party who has incurred expense as a result of the failure to comply, or both; in addition, the court may impose such other sanctions as justice requires. See

MICHELLE PRICHARDDepartment 07 Phone#: 253-798-7568 Judicial assistant to: Judge Jerry Costello

\

a

Superior Court Clerk for Filing (Court File Copy)

\lxciviI.pbl\d_noncompIianceJetter_report

Page 145: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGT

October 09 2014 10:26 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child(ren), DECLARATION OF MAILINGNATHAN E. LENSCH,

Petitioner,AndSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent.

I, Sally DuCharme, am over the age of 18, and competent to testify in the above entitled case.

On October 8, 2014, I placed in the U.S. Mail a copy of the following documents in the above-entitled caption:

1. Temporary Order entered on October 1,20142. Temporary Parenting Plan entered on October 1,2014,

Said documents were addressed to:

Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498 I

I declare, under the penalty of perjury and the Laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED October 8,2014 v

-Sally DuCharme, Legal Assistant

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Declaration of Mailing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 146: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

334 County-City Building 930 Tacoma Avenue South

Tacoma, Washington 98402-2102

DATED: October 30, 2014

( Re: Cause No. 14-3-03127-0 Docket code: CRRSPNATHAN E LENSCH vs.SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Dear Counsel or PRO SE (Self-Represented):Hy Court records indicate that the attorneys and/or parties listed below have failed to comply with the Casef I Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department in regard to the following items: '

Certificate of Parenting Class - Petitioner's - Not Filed Deadline: 10/14/14H Certificate of Parenting Class - Respondent's - Not Filed Deadline: 10/14/14h Settlement Conference not confirmed by deadline - (See PCLR 16 & PCLSPR Deadline: 10/28/14

94.04)

Q 14-3-03127-0 43566543 LTR7

(253) 798-3654 FAX (253) 798-7214

11-03-14

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY

Pursuant to Pierce County Local Rules and also pursuant to the Case Scheduling Order or Order Assigning Case to Department given to you at the time of filing this case, you are out of compliance. Please take the actions necessary to immediately comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department. Please file and deliver a courtesy copy of the document to the Judge.

If the court finds that an attorney or party has failed to comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department and has no reasonable excuse, the court may order the attorney or party to pay monetary sanctions to the court, or terms to any other party who has incurred expense as a result of the failure to comply, or both; in addition, the court may impose such other sanctions as justice requires. See PCLR 3(k).

Copies mailed to:

Superior Court Clerk for Filing (Court File Copy)

Sincerely,

MICHELLE PRICHARD Department 07 Phone #: 253-798-7568 Judicial.assistant to: Judge Jerry Costello

\lxcivil.pbM_noncompliance_letter_report

Page 147: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

14-3-03127-0 43566545 LTR7

(253) 798-3654 FAX (253) 798-7214

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

5TATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY

DATED: October 30, 2014

334 County-City Building 930 Tacoma Avenue South

Tacoma, Washington 98402-2102

f

Re: Cause No. 14-3-03127-0NATHAN E LENSCHvs.SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

Docket code: CRRSP

Dear Counsel or PRO SE (Self-Represented):'

Court records indicate that the attorneys and/or parties listed below have failed to comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department in regard to the following items:

Certificate of Parenting Class - Petitioner's - Not Filed Deadline: 10/14/14Certificate of Parenting Class - Respondent's - Not Filed Deadline: 10/14/14Settlement Conference not confirmed by deadline - (See PCLR 16 & PCLSPR Deadline: 10/28/1494.04)

Pursuant to Pierce County Local Rules and also pursuant to the Case Scheduling Order or Order Assigning Case to Department given to you at the time of filing this case, you are out of compliance: Please take the actions necessary to immediately comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department. Please file and deliver a courtesy copy of the document to the Judge.

If the court finds that an attorney or party has failed to comply with the Case Schedule or Order Assigning Case to Department and has no reasonable excuse, the court may order the attorney or party to pay monetary sanctions to the court, or terms to any other party who has incurred expense as a result of the failure to comply, or both; in addition, the court may impose such other sanctions as justice requires. See PCLR 3(k).

Copies mailed to:

MICHELLE PRICHARDDepartment 07 Phone #: 253-798-7568 Judicial assistant to: Judge Jerry Costello

Superior Court Clerk for Filing (Court File Copy)

Mxcivil. pbl\d_noncompliance_le tter_report

Page 148: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON

December 19 2014 10:03 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY

NATHAN E LENSCH VS. SOPHIA RUTSCHOW

The case(s) listed above were previously assigned to Department 07 Judge JERRY COSTELLO. Judge BRYAN CHUSHCOFF has assumed this case. Unless otherwise notified, your trial date and case schedule, if set, remain unchanged.

If the case is resolved, call Department 04 at (253) 798-7574 or e-mail to: [email protected]

If you are an attorney and have withdrawn from this case, contact the Clerk's office.

Dated December 19, 2014

Mailed to:Daniel N Cook RUTSCHOW, SOPHIA

Ronald E. Culpepper Presiding Judge

rast-0006.pdf

Page 149: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFF

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINi

January 29 2015 1:53 P

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of:

ABIGAL LENSCH, No. 14-3-03127-0Child(ren), PETITIONER’S

NATHAN E. LENSCH, DISCLOSURE OF PRIMARY

and

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

WITNESSES

COMES NOW the Petitioner, Nathan E. Lensch, by and through his attorney of

record, Daniel N. Cook, of Faubion, Reeder, Fraley & Cook, P.S. and submits the

following list of primary witnesses for the trial scheduled for April 21,2015.

The following witnesses may testify as to their personal observation of the

Petitioner, Respondent, and any other related pertinent matters.

WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE CALLED AT TIME OF TRIAL

1. Nathan E. Lensch c/o Daniel CookFaubion, Reeder, Fraley & Cook, P.S.5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

WITNESS LIST - Page 1 of 2S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Witness List.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 150: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Witness is Petitioner in this matter and may testify as to all facts relevant to thecase.

2. Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498 (253) 590-7973

Witness is Respondent in this matter and will testify as to all facts relevant to the

3. Jane Lensch 714-827-2003

Witness is the mother of the Petitioner in this matter and will testify as to the parties’ parenting skills and characters.

EXPERT WITNESS EXPECTED TO BE CALLED AT TIME OF TRIAL

1. A drug and alcohol counselor who has evaluated and/or treated the Petitioner and/or the Respondent.

The Petitioner reserves the right to call any witnesses disclosed by the other

party whether or not the other party elects to call that witness.

The Petitioner reserves the right to amend his disclosure of witnesses as

discovery in this action proceeds.

The Petitioner reserves the right to call witnesses necessary for rebuttal of

testimony offered by Respondent.

Dated this ^ 7 day of 2015.

case.

Submitted by: FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

By Daniel N. Cook, WSBA 34866 Of Attorneys for Petitioner

WITNESS LIST - Page 2 of 2S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Witness List.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 151: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFF

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHIN

January 29 2015 3:51

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: ABIGAL LENSCH

Child(ren),NATHAN E. LENSCH,

andPetitioner,

No. 14-3-03127-0

DECLARATION OF MAILING

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

______________________ Respondent.

I, ALYSIA ISHAQUE, am over the age of 18, and competent to testify in the above entitled case.

On January 29, 2015, I placed in the U.S. Mail a copy of the following documents in the above-entitled caption:

1. Petitioner’s Disclosure of Primary Witnesses

Said documents were addressed to:

Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498

I declare, under the penalty of perjury and the Laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct.

Declaration Of Mailing REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\2015.01.29 Declaration of Marling doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 152: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

DATED January 29, 2015 ( jl' uj_Alysia Ishaque

Declaration Of MailingS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\2015.01.29 Declaration of Maiiing.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 153: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTO

ji

February 25 2015 11:10 AM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 14-3-03127-0ABIGAIL LENSCH,

Child , AMENDED PROPOSEDNATHAN E. LENSCH, PARENTING PLAN

Petitioner, (PPP)andSOPHIA RUTSCHOW,

Respondent.

This AMENDED parenting plan is proposed by NATHAN LENSCH.

It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed:

I. General Information

This parenting plan applies to the following children:

Name AgeABIGAIL LENSCH Age: 6

II. Basis for Restrictions

Under certain circumstances, as outlined below, the court may limit or prohibit a parent’s contact with the child and the right to make decisions for the children.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 1 of 10 FAUBION, REEDER,WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.016, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.. 181;. 187;. 194 5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, Sophia Lakewood, WA 98499S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc Phone1 (253) 581-0660

Page 154: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2.1 Parental Conduct (RCW 26.09.191(1), (2))

Does not apply.

2.2 Other Factors (RCW 26.09.191(3))

The Respondent/Mother’s involvement or conduct may have an adverse effect on the children’s best interests because of the existence of the factors which follow:

The residential schedule must set forth where the child shall reside each day of the year, including provisions for holidays, birthdays of family members, vacations, and other special occasions, and what contact the child shall have with each parent. Parents are encouraged to create a residential schedule that meets the developmental needs of the child and individual needs of their family. Paragraphs 3.1 through 3.9 are one way to write your residential schedule. If you do not use these paragraphs, write in your own schedule in Paragraph 3.13.

3.1 Schedule for Child Under School Age

Does not apply.

3.2 School Schedule

Upon enrollment in school, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother:

PHASE 1: Professionally supervised visits only because of the mother’s failure to engage in treatment and recent drunken binges while caring for the child and the mother’s hostile and confrontational treatment of the child and father. Supervised visits at mother’s expense. Dates and times to be arranged in conjunction with the father’s schedule.

PHASE 2: This phase starts after the mother has completed her drug/alcohol with parenting component evaluation and continues so long as she is in compliance and making progress in any recommended treatment. In Phase 2 the child will reside with the mother from 4:30 or 5:30 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays and from Sunday at 6:00 p.m. until Tuesday at drop-off at school (and father picks up from daycare on Tuesday) every other weekend.

A long-term impairment resulting from drug, alcohol, or other substance abuse that interferes with the performance of parenting functions.

III. Residential Schedule

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 2 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253)581-0660

Page 155: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

PHASE 3: This phase starts after the mother has completed her drug/alcohol with parenting component evaluation and continues so long as she is in compliance and making progress in any recommended treatment and after the mother has established safe, stable and long term housing for the child. In Phase 3 the child will reside with the mother from 4:30 or 5:30 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. Thursdays and from Sunday at 6:00 p.m. until Tuesday at drop-off at school (and father picks up from daycare on Tuesday) every weekend.

3.3 Schedule for Winter Vacation

The child shall reside with the father during winter vacation, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Winter Vacation shall be defined as commencing the day after school lets out for the Winter Vacation Break and concluding on the day before school resumes.

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10,

In even numbered years, the mother shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. until December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In odd numbered years, the mother shall have the child from December 24th 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.In odd numbered years the father shall have the child for the first half of the Winter Vacation. Visitation shall begin the day after school lets out at 9:00 a.m. and conclude on December 24th at 8:00 p.m. In even numbered years the father shall have the child from December 24th at 8:00 p.m. through the day before school resumes at 6:00 p.m.

3.4 Schedule for Other School Breaks

The child shall reside with the father during spring break, except for the following days and times when the child will reside with or be with the other parent:

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Spring break with the mother even years.

3.5 Summer Schedule

Upon completion of the school year, the child shall reside with the father except for the following days and times when the child shall reside with the mother.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 3 of 10WPF PS 01,0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone:(253)581-0660

Page 156: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, Same as school year schedule

3.6 Vacation With Parents

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10, each parent shall have two weeks with the child for vacation during the summer months when the child is off from school. Before the age of 10 no more than seven consecutive days uninterrupted with either parent. After the age of 10 than the entire two weeks may be uninterrupted with either parent.

Each parent shall notify the other parent in writing of his or her two weeks of vacation no later than May 1 of each year. If there is a conflict in vacation dates the father’s choice will control in odd years and the mother’s choice will control in even years.

3.7 Schedule for Holidays

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10: The residential schedule for the child for the holidays listed below is as follows:

New Year’s Day Martin Luther King Day Presidents’ Day Memorial Day Easter July 4th Labor Day Veterans’ Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Eve Christmas Day

With Mother (Specify Year Odd/Even/Everv)See Par. 3.3***

OddEven

EvenSee Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3

With Father (Specify Year Odd/Even/Everv)See Par. 3.3***

EvenOdd*

EveryOdd

See Par. 3.3 See Par. 3.3

Holidays marked with an asterisk (*) shall be spent with the parent who is entitled to the adjoining weekend.

Holidays shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Holiday at 8:00 p.m.

3.8 Schedule for Special Occasions

Subject to the requirements of Paragraph 3.10: The residential schedule for the child for the following special occasions (for example, birthdays) is as follows:

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 4 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253)581-0660

Page 157: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Mother’s Day Father’s Day Halloween Child’s Birthday

With Mother With Father(Specify Year (Specify YearOdd/Even/Everv) Odd/Even/Everv)

EveryEvery

Even OddOdd Even

If the Special Occasion is on a non-school day, the Special Occasion shall be the night before at 6:00 p.m. until the day of the Special Occasion at 8:00 p.m.

If the Special Occasion is on a school day, the Special Occasion shall be from after school on the day of the Special Occasion until the8:00 p.m. on the day of the Special Occasion.

3.9 Priorities Under the Residential Schedule

Paragraphs 3.31 - 3.8, have priority over paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2, in the following order:

Rank the order of priority, with 1 being given the highest priority:2 holidays (3.7) 4 school breaks (3.4)1 special occasions (3.8) 6 summer schedule (3.5)3 winter vacation (3.3) 5 vacation with parents (3.6)

3.10 Restrictions

SUPERVISED VISITATION

The mother’s visits will remain supervised until all of the following conditions have been met for a period of two consecutive months:

1. Mother has completed her drug/alcohol evaluation with parenting assessment;

2. Mother has had consistent supervised visitation;3. Mother has demonstrated the ability to provide food, shelter and

a safe, nurturing home environment4. Mother has demonstrated the ability to maintain safe and

reliable transportation for the child in the event of an emergency.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL EVALUTION WITH PARENTING ASSESSMENT

The mother shall complete a Crossroads drug and alcohol evaluation with parenting assessment, which shall include collateral contacts, and shall complete any follow-up treatment recommended by Crossroads.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 5 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone:(253)581-0660

Page 158: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The mother shall sign an authorization for release of information to Petitioner/father Nathan Lensch for all assessments and records (including all UA results) for the treatment program ordered above. Mother shall also arrange to have any and all progress reports filed directly with the court and sent directly to the mother.

SAFETY OF MOTHER’S RESIDENCE AFTER SUPERVISED VISITATION

After supervised visitation is not required pursuant to the paragraph above, then prior to any unsupervised visitation being required the mother SHALL provide to the father her current address, the full name and date of birth of all adults (over 18) of everyone in the household, and if the father questions the validity of the residence, shall permit an inspection of the residence. The father has the right to refuse visitation if the home environment is unsatisfactory and the father shall then note a hearing for further instructions and for a determination by the court of whether visitation should be allowed or if visitation should be supervised until the problematic conditions in the home are remedied.

3.11 Transportation Arrangements

Transportation costs are included in the Child Support Worksheets and/or the Order of Child Support and should not be included here.Transportation arrangements for the child, between parents shall be as follows:

Father shall provide transportation while mother’s visitation is supervised.

When visitation is unsupervised, transportation shall be shared equally with the receiving parent picking up the child at the start of his or her residential time.

3.12 Designation of Custodian

The child named in this parenting plan are schedule to reside the majority of the time with the father. This parent is designated the custodian of the child solely for purposes of all other state and federal statutes which require a designation or determination of custody. This designation shall not affect either parent’s rights and responsibilities under this parenting plan.

3.13 Other

Both parents shall provide a safe, sanitary home for the child at all times.

Both parents shall provide adequate bedrooms for the child to sleep in a comfortable home environment that is not crowded.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 6 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 159: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Both parents shall refrain from use of all illegal drugs or prescription medication except as directed by a physician with a lawful prescription at any time regardless of presence or absence of child.

Both parents shall refrain from use of all alcohol during his or her residential time caring for the child.

Neither parent shall transport, nor allow any other individual to transport, the child in a vehicle except with by a driver with a valid driver’s license, in an insured vehicle and using all lawful child safety restraints.

3.14 Summary of RCW 26.09.430 - .480, Regarding Relocation of a Child

This is a summary only. For the full text, please see RCW 26.09.430 through26.09.480.

If the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time plans to move, that person shall give notice to every person entitled to court ordered time with the children.

If the move is outside the children’s school district, the relocating person must give notice by personal service or by mail requiring a return receipt. This notice must be at least 60 days before the intended move. If the relocating person could not have known about the move in time to give 60 days’ notice, that person must give notice within 5 days after learning of the move. The notice must contain the information required in RCW 26.09.440. See also form DRPSCU07.0500, (Notice of Intended Relocation of A Child).

If the move is within the same school district, the relocating person must provide actual notice by any reasonable means. A person entitled to time with the child may not object to the move but may ask for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

Notice may be delayed for 21 days if the relocating person is entering a domestic violence shelter or is moving to avoid a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to health and safety.

If information is protected under a court order or the address confidentiality program, it may be withheld from the notice.

A relocating person may ask the court to waive any notice requirements that may put the health and safety of a person or a child at risk.

Failure to give the required notice may be grounds for sanctions, including contempt.

If no objection is filed within 30 days after service of the notice of intended relocation, the relocation will be permitted and the proposed revised residential schedule may be confirmed.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 7 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 160: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A person entitled to time with a child under a court order can file an objection to the child’s relocation whether or not he or she received proper notice.

An objection may be filed by using the mandatory pattern form WPF DRPSCU07.0700, (Objection to Relocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule). The objection must be served on all persons entitled to time with the children.

The relocating person shall not move the child during the time for objection unless: (a) the delayed notice provisions apply; or (b) a court order allows the move.

If the objecting person schedules a hearing for a date within 15 days of timely service of the objection, the relocating person shall not move the child before the hearing unless there is a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to the health or safety of a person or a child.

4.1 Day-to-Day Decisions

Each parent shall make decisions regarding the day-to-day care and control of each child while the child is residing with that parent. Regardless of the allocation of decision making in this parenting plan, either parent may make emergency decisions affecting the health or safety of the children.

4.2 Major Decisions

Major decisions regarding each child shall be made as follows:Education decisions fatherNon-emergency health care fatherReligious upbringing father

4.3 Restrictions in Decision Making

Sole decision making shall be ordered to the father for the following reasons:

One parent is opposed to mutual decision making, and such opposition is reasonably based on the following criteria:

(a) The existence of a limitation under RCW 26.09.191;(b) The history of participation of each parent in decision making

in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a);(c) Whether the parents have demonstrated ability and desire to

cooperate with one another in decision making in each of the areas in RCW 26.09.184(4)(a); and

(d) The parents’ geographic proximity to one another, to the

IV. Decision Making

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 8 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - R C W 26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 161: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

extent that it affects their ability to make timely mutual decisions.

V. Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this dispute resolution process is to resolve disagreements about carrying out this parenting plan. This dispute resolution process may, and under some local court rules or the provisions of this plan must be used before filing a petition to modify the plan or a motion for contempt for failing to follow the plan.

Disputes between the parties, other than child support disputes, shall besubmitted to (list person or agency):

mediation by Pierce County Dispute Resolution Center.

The cost of this process shall be allocated between the parties as follows:50% petitioner; 50% respondent

The dispute resolution process shall be commenced by notifying the other partyby written request via certified mail:

In the dispute resolution process:

(a) Preference shall be given to carrying out this Parenting Plan.(b) Unless an emergency exists, the parents shall use the designated process

to resolve disputes relating to implementation of the plan, except those related to financial support.

(c) A written record shall be prepared of any agreement reached in counseling or mediation and of each arbitration award and shall be provided to each party.

(d) If the court finds that a parent has used or frustrated the dispute resolution process without good reason, the court shall award attorneys’ fees and financial sanctions to the other parent.

(e) The parties have the right of review from the dispute resolution process to the superior court.

VI. Other ProvisionsThe mother has a history of unstable and inconsistent home environment and alcohol impairment which makes caring for the child difficult. The father has a history of trying to accommodate and foster the child’s relationship with her mother notwithstanding her shortcomings as a parent. To the extent the father is convinced the child would be safe and not at risk by spending more time with mother than strictly authorized by this plan he is permitted to allow her to spend more time with mother in his sole discretion. Allowing the child to spend more time with the mother is not an integration or waiver of the requirements of this plan.

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 9 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253)581-0660

Page 162: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Allowing the children to spend more time with the mother does not create a basis for modification of this plan. This provision is designed to allow the father to be flexible because of the mother’s history of sometimes being in a place where the children are safe with her and other times having serious and warranted concerns,

VII. Declaration for Proposed Parenting Plan

(Only sign if this is a proposed parenting plan.) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that this plan has been proposed in good faith and that the statements in Part II of this Plan are true and correct.

,P -/z 3 / / ,-;/ <Nathan Lensch, Petitioner Date and Place of Signature

VIII. Order by the CourtIt is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the parenting plan set forth above is adopted and approved as an order of this court.

WARNING: Violation of residential provisions of this order with actual knowledge of its terms is punishable by contempt of court and may be a criminal offense under RCW 9A.40.060(2) or 9A.40.070(2). Violation of this order may subject a violator to arrest.

When mutual decision making is designated but cannot be achieved, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the issue through the dispute resolution process.

If a parent fails to comply with a provision of this plan, the other parent’s obligations under the plan are not affected.

Dated;___________________________ ________________________________Judge/Commissioner

Presented by: Approved and agreed by:FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S. Notice of presentation waived:

A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Daniel N. Cook, WSBA #34866 Attorney for Petitioner

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

__________________ , WSBA #_____Attorney for Respondent

Approved and agreed by:A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Nathan Lensch, Petitioner Sophia Rutschow, Respondent

Parenting Plan (PPP, PPT, PP) - Page 10 of 10WPF PS 01.0400 Mandatory (12/2009) - RCW26.26.130, 26.09.016, .181; .187; .194Lensch, Nathan and Rutschow, SophiaS:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Amended Proposed Parenting Plan.doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 Phone: (253) 581-0660

Page 163: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

E-FILEDIN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFI<

PIERCE COUNTY, WASHING

March 03 2015 2:25 PM

KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK

NO: 14-3-03127-0

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE

In re the Parenting and Support of:

ABIGAL LENSCH,Child(ren),

No. 14-3-03127-0

PETITIONER’S AMENDEDNATHAN E. LENSCH, DISCLOSURE OF PRIMARY

Petitioner, WITNESSESand

SOPHIA RUTSCHOW,Respondent.

COMES NOW the Petitioner, Nathan E. Lensch, by and through his attorney of

record, Daniel N. Cook, of Faubion, Reeder, Fraley & Cook, P.S. and submits the

following list of primary witnesses for the trial scheduled for April 21, 2015.

The following witnesses may testify as to their personal observation of the

Petitioner, Respondent, and any other related pertinent matters.

WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE CALLED AT TIME OF TRIAL

1. Nathan E. Lensch c/o Daniel CookFaubion, Reeder, Fraley & Cook, P.S.5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

WITNESS LIST - Page 1 of 3S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Witness List (Amended).doc

FAUBION, REEDER, FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 164: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Witness is Petitioner in this matter and may testify as to all facts relevant to thecase.

2. Sophia Rutschow 9117 70th St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498 (253) 590-7973

Witness is Respondent in this matter and will testify as to all facts relevant to thecase.

3. Jane Lensch 714-827-2003

Witness is the mother of the Petitioner in this matter and will testify as to the parties’ parenting skills and characters.

4. Lucinda Park

Witness is the mother of the Respondent in this matter and will testify as to the parties’ parenting skills and characters.

5. Anne Glasscok

Witness is a friend of the Respondent in this matter and will testify as to the parties’ parenting skills and characters.

6. Annie Rice

Witness is a friend of the Respondent in this matter and will testify as to the parties’ parenting skills and characters.

EXPERT WITNESS EXPECTED TO BE CALLED AT TIME OF TRIAL

1. A drug and alcohol counselor who has evaluated and/or treated the Petitioner and/or the Respondent.

The Petitioner reserves the right to call any witnesses disclosed by the other

party whether or not the other party elects to call that witness.

The Petitioner reserves the right to amend his disclosure of witnesses as

discovery in this action proceeds.

WITNESS LIST - Page 2 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Witness List (Amended).doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660

Page 165: Nathan e Lensch vs. Sophia Rutschow 14-3-03127-0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8, r-

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

The Petitioner reserves the right to call witnesses necessary for rebuttal of

testimony offered by Respondent.

Dated this jt'ty c day of March 2015.

Submitted by: FAUBION, REEDERJFB A L E Y & COOK, P.S.

By DamelN. Cook, WSBA 34866 Of Attorneys for Petitioner

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, SALLY DUCHARME, declare as follows:

I am a resident of the State of Washington. I am over the age of 18 years old and not a party to the within entitled cause. I am employed by the law firm of Faubion, Reeder, Fraley & Cook, PS, whose address is 5920 - 100TFI Street SW, Suite 25, Lakewood, WA 98499.

On March 3, 2015, I sent out for service upon the below-listed parties at the addresses and in the manner described below, the above document:

Sophia Rutschow CT Via US Mail9117 70th St. SW □ Via Hand Delivery / Legal MessengerLakewood, WA 98498 □ Via Electronic Mail / E-Service

□ Via Facsimile□ Via Federal Express

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the forgoing is true and correct.

SIGNED AND DATED at Lakewood, Washington on March 3, 2015.

i / V t k / -------------------------------------

SALZy DUCHARME

WITNESS LIST - Page 3 of 3 FAUBION, REEDER,S:\CASES1\Lensch\DRAFTS\Pleadings\Witness List (Amended).doc FRALEY & COOK, P.S.

5920 100th Street SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499

253-581-0660