naïve investing – company stock
DESCRIPTION
Naïve Investing – Company Stock. PADM 5111 – Microeconomics for Policy Analysis Presented by Amanda Wright & Glenn Horne Thursday, September 18, 2014. Agenda. Background Survey Employee Attitudes Employer Attitudes Double Nudge Conclusion. Background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Naïve Investing – Company Stock
PADM 5111 – Microeconomics for Policy Analysis
Presented by Amanda Wright & Glenn Horne
Friday, April 21, 2023
2
Agenda
BackgroundSurveyEmployee AttitudesEmployer AttitudesDouble NudgeConclusion
3
Background Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (ERISA)
puts forth three fiduciary principles for retirement plan investments:
– Exclusive benefit rule requires that plans be managed for the benefit of participants
– Prudence rule requires that plan assets be invested according to a ‘prudent investor’ standard
– Diversification rule requires that plans be diversified so to minimize the risk of large losses
Company stock is exempt from the diversification requirement
4
Post Enron U.S. Congress has considered a range of legal reforms that
would protect employees against the risks associated with investments in their employer’s security (company stock)
The most cautious proposal would require an annual disclosure about company stock risks to participants and would limit an employer’s ability to restrict a participants right to diversify company stock
More ambitious initiatives would require mandatory diversification above some limit or disallow employee contributions in stock when employers already match
Legislation has not been passed because of questions regarding its necessity
5
The Study: Reality and Perceptions Survey 501 employee respondents at 100 different
companies Goal to obtain a better understanding of how employees
think about the costs and benefits of owning company stock
The employer survey was 150 firms that offer company stock in their retirement savings plans
Goal was to obtain better understanding of employers perspectives on the costs and benefits of requiring employees to own company stock
6
Employees and Company Stock 11 million participants is U.S. define-contribution plans
have more than 20% of their account balance invested in company stock.
Within this group 5 million have more than 60% concentrated in their employer’s stock.
According to estimates $1 in company stock is worth less than half the value of $1 in a mutual fund.
7
Employer Company Stock %
Procter and Gamble Co. 90
Abbott Laboratories 78
Pfizer Inc. 75
General Electric Co. 68
Southern Co. 65
Marsh & McLennan 64
Target Corp. 60
Chevron Texaco Corp. 60
Meadwestvaco Corp. 59
Textron Inc. 55
Kimberly-Clark Corp. 55
Bank of America 54
Merrill Lynch & Co. 52
Johnson & Johnson 50
Merck & Co. 50
Allocation of Retirement Plan Assets to Company Stock
8
Benefits to EmployeeAdvantageous Tax Treatment: Investment in company stock does have tax advantages that
are not available for other investment funds in 401(k) plans Only 1/10 respondents aware of the preferential tax treatment 12% think that company stock is taxed at higher rates Most respondents either didn’t know (35%) or think that
company stock has the same tax treatment as other investments (44%)
Those who know company stock has preferential tax treatment allocate 20.9% of monthly contributions to company stock
Those who thought has tax disadvantage allocate 28.3%
9
Private Information: Employees might more know about their employer than of
outside investors Unconvincing because employees at a large company
unlikely to know about all the different products and divisions
Large extent of company stock allocation based on public information
Nonmonetary Benefits: Feeling as part of the team? 32% confirm they feel better for owning company stock However 59% said does not affect them Overall no evidence that employees value the benefits of
owning company stock
10
Costs to the Employee
Idiosyncratic Risk: Investing in single stock very costly People can loose job and retirement funds all at once (Enron) People do not understand the risk-and-return profile of company
stock Only 16% of employees understand their employer’s stock is
riskier than the overall stock market Vanguard survey data indicates that average participant views
company stock as safer than a diversified stock fund
11
Even after educating people about the Enron bankruptcy case, 25% of respondents said they believe their company stock is safer than diversified fund and another 39% said they believe it has the same level of risk
Participants base their risk perceptions on past returns and not on the volatility of returns
Nonmonetary Costs: Not owning company stock may provoke employees to
feel they have betrayed their employer However no evidence that loyalty correlates with
decisions to invest in company stock
12
Summary: The Employee
Majority of employees do not place much weight on the alleged benefits of owning company stock
Most employees do not appreciate the risk of investing in a single stock
13
Benefits to Employer
Increased motivation & productivityAdvantageous tax treatmentAdvantageous treatment under fiduciary law “Friendly Hands”Cash flow
14
Cost to Employers
Costs as managers of the retirement portfolio:– Lack of diversification
However, they also indicated if given the opportunity to change the makeup of the portfolio they would not.
15
Employers Summary
Benefits are limited at best.Employers do not appear to have a good
perception of the true costs and benefits of having high rates of employee investment in company stock.
16
Double Nudge
Employers are given a nudge via Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974
Employers nudge employees based on overestimation of true benefits.
17
Conclusion
You have to get at the root of the nudge.Eliminate the company stock exemption
from the diversification requirement.