nag directors meeting may 1-2 2013. ressource estimates o iea, usgs geological potential for shale...

12
DENMARK – SHALE GAS NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013

Upload: dexter-chard

Post on 31-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

DENMARK – SHALE GASNAG Directors Meeting

May 1-2 2013

Page 2: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Key points of discussion Ressource estimates

o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark

o Alun shale studies Present exploration in Denmark

o Total in northern Jutland and in northern Zeeland, drilling postponed from 2013 to 2014

Political situationo Parliament discussions and questions, Government internally

(Environment versus Energy) versus local authorities, NGO’s International collaboration

o EuroGeoSurveys GeoEnergy Expert Group, continuation from conventional assessments with USGS, new Baltic study, new EERA, future NAG??

Page 3: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Shale Gas Activities in Europe

3

Drilling activity

UK

The Netherlands

Germany

Sweden

Poland / Baltic

Poland / Podlasie

Poland / Lublin

France

Denmark

Bulgaria

Page 4: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Ressources, EIA 2011

o No discoveries in Alun shale

o Ressources estimated by U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2011.

o 23 Tcf !!!

o Totally unrealistic, poor work compared to e.g. USGS assessments

Map and Table from EIA, 2011

Page 5: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

5GIS model baseret på: Korlægning (Lassen & Tybo 2012), algoritmer (Petersen, Schovsbo, Nielsen 2013), geologiske modeller (Nielsen & Schovsbo 2013; Buchardt, Schovsbo, Nielsen 1997)

© GEUS 2013

• 13 000 Km2 large prospectivie onshore area with Alun shale

• 50% with high expectations

• 32% in optimal depht range between 1.5 and 5 km

Potential for shale gas in Denmark

Page 6: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

• High chance for some potential in the Alun shale, but no drilling yet

• Potential is restricted to relatively small areas in Denmark

• An assessment will be completed in 2013, and most likely updated after the first wells

• No numbers yet, but likely to be much lower than the 2011 EIA study

General comments on shale gas in Denmark

6

Page 7: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Shale Gas research subjects

• Understand processes critical to formation, accumulation, occurrence, and alteration of shale gas resourceso GEUS: traditional petroleum-related research

• Conduct scientifically robust assessments of those resources o GEUS: collaboration and data input

• Study impact of shale gas resource occurrence, production and use on environmental and human healtho GEUS: groundwater, surface, seismicity

7

Page 8: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Licensing rounds

Open Door

Page 9: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Shale gas in Baltikum (USGS)

• Pilot study of gas potential of the Lower Paleozoic Shales in the Baltic Basin together with USGS.

• The overall goal with this pilot study is get an independent, scientific based, assessment of the shale gas resources in the Baltic Basin.

• It includes on- and offshore areas in the following countries: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Germany.

• The European geological surveys has the data and knowledge on the specific shale stratigraphy, sedimentology, petrography etc.

• By combining the knowledge from each survey into a basin wide synthesis, knowledge is shared and the end product improved.

• USGS has built up, through their work in the US, a vast experience in assessing the shale gas potential.

• It is hoped that the pilot will develop into a study, that covers the entire Europe, financed by the Horizon 2020.

9

Page 10: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

The Baltic Basin

10

NGU

PGI

SGU

GEUS

BGR

EGK

LEGMA ??

LGT

Page 11: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

EERA Shale gas initiative

EERA Shale Gas Awareness EventENEA EU Liaison Office

Brussels, February 28th 2013

The Joint Programme on Shale Gas has been unanimously approved by the EERA Executive Committee during their meeting 17th April 2013.

11

Page 12: NAG Directors Meeting May 1-2 2013. Ressource estimates o IEA, USGS Geological potential for shale gas in Denmark o Alun shale studies Present exploration

Program structure & coordination

www.eera-set.eu

Assessment of shale gas potential

Technology for safe exploitation

Environmental impact & footprint

Energy and carbon emissions

Regulations, market and policy issues

Public perception

Basin Scale Architecture

Micro-scale characterisation

Methods for Shale Gas reserves estimation

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 3

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 3

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 3

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 3

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 3

GEUSPeter Britze

[email protected]

SINTEFMaria Barrio

[email protected]

TNOJan ter Heege

[email protected]

LNEGMachado Leite

[email protected]

ECNJeroen de Joode

[email protected]

UKERCJohn Loughhead

[email protected]

TNO, Rene Peters, [email protected]