naat is it time for a new option in california?. background cdc 2009 guidelines recommend naat for...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NAAT
Is it Time for a New Option in California?
![Page 2: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background
• CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result would alter treatment or TB control activities
• Experience in several settings has found significant efficiencies with NAAT by reducing unnecessary– treatment– isolation– contact investigation
![Page 3: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Challenges
• Test characteristics– limited sensitivity for smear negative – laboratory complexity (MTD)– variable performance (home brew)
• Availability
• Delay in results
![Page 4: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
GeneXpert (Cepheid)
• New platform for TB NAAT• Platform used for other diseases• Technically simple• Performance similar to MTD
– very high specificity– very high sensitivity for smear positive– ~75% sensitivity for smear negative
• Provides rapid rifampin susceptibility• FDA approval possible
![Page 5: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Luke Davis. MD
Under-treatment is rare in SFDPH TB Clinic…• 426 TB suspects (TB5) in 2009 • 65 (15%) TB3
– Only 2 (3%) not started on empiric treatment
![Page 6: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Luke Davis. MD
…Over-treatment is common in SFDPH TB Clinic• 109/426 TB5s were treated
– 46/109 (42%) did not have TB • 31 (29%) received unnecessary DOT • Median 47 days of unnecessary treatment
• 29/63 (46%) contact investigations initiated unnecessarily– 87/321 (27%) “case” contacts unnecessarily identified
![Page 7: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Luke Davis. MD
TB GeneXpert Protocol at SFDPH• Included
– Pulmonary TB Suspect High/Moderate starting TB treatment– Pulmonary TB Suspect Low in congregate housing
• Excluded– Prior TB treatment within last 12 months
• Procedures– Sputum x 3 for routine AFB smear/culture– Sputum x 1 for TB GeneXpert
• Testing – Performed at SFDPH 2-3 days week, results within 1-2 days
• Monthly follow-up until confirmed final diagnosis if treatment held
![Page 8: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Luke Davis. MD
15 High & Moderate TB Suspects on Treatment• Xpert changed treatment in 9
– 4 AFB+, Xpert+ M. TB, empiric treatment continued– 1 AFB+, Xpert- M. kansasii, empiric treatment changed– 10 AFB-, Xpert-
• 8 empiric treatments changed– 6 TB0 Stopped when Xpert-– 2 TB4 Tailored to INH+RIF for TB4
• 2 empiric treatments continued– 1 TB0 Stopped after 2 months– 1 TB3 Continued when BAL +
• Contact investigation suspended in all 11 Xpert- – In 1 AFB-, BAL MTB+ patient, contact investigation started later
![Page 9: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Luke Davis. MD
4 TB5 Low
• 3 not on treatment– All AFB-, Xpert-
• Sent to MH/SA programs
• 1 on treatment – AFB-, Xpert-
• Treatment discontinued• Sent to MH/SA program
TB controllersHow birds see the world
![Page 10: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why Now?
• APHL/CDC funding opportunity for equipment and supply purchase
• New system with better characteristics
• Importance of efficiency in current resource setting
• Continued requests for NAAT
![Page 11: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Options
• Local public health labs could implement—likely not feasible for all
• Some hospitals may offer—availability unclear
• CDPH could implement, either at state or a local lab
![Page 12: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
State Option
• GeneXpert system– rapid diagnosis of M. tb complex (NAAT)– expanded rapid rifampin resistance testing
• Follow up culture and DST
• Prepaid shipping contract
![Page 13: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What Will it Take?
• Funds available for initial investment
• Recurrent costs (staff, supplies, shipping): $215,000/year
• Some funds may come from other sources– CDCR?– CDC?
• Balance from local assistance/detention– used for emergency funding requests
![Page 14: NAAT Is it Time for a New Option in California?. Background CDC 2009 guidelines recommend NAAT for each patient with suspected TB for whom the test result](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649f355503460f94c52a91/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Discussion