n-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

Upload: sarah-dalton

Post on 09-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    1/9

    N-acetyl histidine-conjugated glycol chitosan self-assembled nanoparticles

    for intracytoplasmic delivery of drugs: Endocytosis, exocytosis

    and drug release

    Ji Sun Parka,b, Tae Hee Han a, c, Kuen Yong Lee c, Sung Soo Han d, Jung Jin Hwang a,Dae Hyuk Moon b, Sang Yoon Kim e, Yong Woo Cho a,b,

    a Asan Institute for Life Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Koreab Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea

    c Department of Bioengineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Koread

    School of Textiles, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Koreae Department of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea

    Received 25 April 2006; accepted 10 July 2006

    Available online 20 July 2006

    Abstract

    Nano-sized vesicular systems (nanoparticles), ranging from 10 nm to 1000 nm in size, have potential applications as drug delivery systems.

    Successful clinical applications require the efficient intracellular delivery of drug-loaded nanoparticles. Here we describe N-acetyl histidine-

    conjugated glycol chitosan (NAcHis-GC) self-assembled nanoparticles as a promising system for intracytoplasmic delivery of drugs. Because N-

    acetyl histidine (NAcHis) is hydrophobic at neutral pH, the conjugates formed self-assembled nanoparticles with mean diameters of 150 250 nm.

    In slightly acidic environments, such as those in endosomes, the nanoparticles were disassembled due to breakdown of the hydrophilic/

    hydrophobic balance by the protonation of the imidazole group of NAcHis. Cellular internalization and drug release of the pH-sensitive self-assembled nanoparticles were investigated by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. NAcHis-GC nanoparticles internalized by adsorptive

    endocytosis were exocytosed or localized in endosomes. The amount of exocytosed nanoparticles was dependent on the pre-incubation time prior

    to removal of free nanoparticles from the culture media. Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy showed that NAcHis-GC nanoparticles released

    drugs into the cytosol and cell cycle analysis demonstrated that paclitaxel-incorporated NAcHis-GC nanoparticles were effective in inducing arrest

    of cell growth.

    2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Nanoparticle; Histidine; Chitosan; Endocytosis; Exocytosis; Endosome; Paclitaxel; Cell cycle arrest

    1. Introduction

    Various polymeric nanoparticles have been studied for the

    intracellular delivery of different classes of therapeutic agents,

    such as chemicals, oligonucleotides, siRNA, DNA, and proteins

    [1]. Nanoparticles are thought to enter cells via an endocytotic

    pathway through either specific (e.g., receptor-mediated

    endocytosis) or non-specific interactions (e.g., adsorptive endo-

    cytosis) with cell membranes. Efficient delivery of therapeutics

    requires that delivery systems overcome intracellular barriers,such as endosomes, and release the therapeutics into the cytosol

    [2,3]. In the absence of a mechanism for endosomal escape, the

    delivery system is localized in endosomes and will ultimately be

    trafficked to lysosomes. Supramolecular assemblies, including

    polymeric micelles and nanoparticles, have been developed,

    which selectively release drugs or genes into the cytosol by

    sensing a low pH in endosomes and lysosomes [48].

    Histidine has served as a pH-responsive fusogen [911]. The

    pKa of the imidazole group of histidine is around 6.5, and

    therefore this group is protonated in slightly acidic milieu

    (Fig. 1). Since histidine is strongly cationic at acidic pH, it

    Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

    www.elsevier.com/locate/jconrel

    Corresponding author. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, University of Ulsan

    College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

    Tel.: +82 2 3010 4112; fax: +82 2 3010 4182.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (Y.W. Cho).

    0168-3659/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.011

    mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.011mailto:[email protected]
  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    2/9

    interacts with negatively-charged endosomal membranes, in-

    duces influx of water and ions, and eventually brings about

    endosome destabilization and drug release. The gene transfec-

    tion efficiency of poly(L-lysine) was significantly enhanced by

    the partial substitution of their -amino groups by histidine,

    probably due to the destabilization of endosomal membranes

    [12

    15]. In addition, histidylated oligolysine facilitated thecytosolic delivery of antisense oligonucleotides [11], and poly

    (L-histidine)-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer micelles

    were found effective for the cytosolic delivery of adriamycin by

    virtue of their fusogenic activity [8,1618].

    Previous reports have described a series of self-assembled

    nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery [1926]. Polymeric

    amphiphiles with an appropriate hydrophilic/hydrophobic ba-

    lance form self-assembled nanoparticles in aqueous milieu.

    These self-assembled nanoparticles were prepared by the con-

    jugation of hydrophobic groups (deoxycholic acid, lithocholic

    acid and adriamycin) to hydrophilic polymers (glycol chitosan

    and heparin). In the present study, N-acetyl histidine (NAcHis)was used as the hydrophobic moiety. At neutral pH, NAcHis is

    expected to constitute a hydrophobic core of self-assembled

    nanoparticles which can serve as a depot for hydrophobic drugs.

    At acidic pH, the imidazole group of NAcHis is expected to be

    protonated, causing disassembly of the nanoparticles and event-

    ual release of drugs into the cytosol. N-acetyl histidine-con-

    jugated glycol chitosan (NAcHis-GC) nanoparticles were

    labeled with fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC) for intracellular

    tracking. The red fluorescent dye DiI was used as a model drug,

    and flow cytometric analysis and confocal microscopy were

    used to monitor intracellular drug delivery. Paclitaxel, a drug

    widely used in the clinical treatment of cancer, was also

    incorporated into NAcHis-GC nanoparticles, and the cytotoxicactivity of the latter against cancer cell lines was investigated by

    cell cycle analysis.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Materials

    Glycol chitosan (GC, MW 250 kDa, degree of deacetylation

    88.7%), purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), was

    dissolved in distilled water, filtered to remove insoluble im-purities, and dialyzed against distilled water. N-acetyl histidine

    (NAcHis), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), N-(3-dimethyl

    aminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-

    hydroxysuccimide (NHS), chloroform, dimethyl sulfoxide

    (DMSO), paclitaxel (PTX), and bovine serum albumin (BSA,

    Fraction V) were purchased from Sigma and used without

    further purification. 1,1-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3,3-tetramethindo-

    carbocyanine perchloate (DiI, MW = 933.88) was purchased

    from Molecular Probes (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Dulbecco's

    modified Eagle's medium/F12 (DMEM/F12), fetal bovine

    serum (FBS), RPMI-1640 medium (RPMI), trypsin-EDTA

    (0.5% trypsin, 5.3 mM EDTA tetra-sodium), and penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/ml) were purchased from Gibco BRL

    (Rockville, MD, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical

    grade and were used as received.

    2.2. Preparation of NAcHis-GC conjugates and FITC-labeling

    GC (0.5 g) and different amounts of NAcHis (0.13

    0.76 mmol) were dissolved in PBS, EDC (0.392.28 mmol)

    and NHS (0.392.28 mmol) were added, and the reaction

    mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The aqueous

    suspension of the reaction products (NAcHis-GC conjugates)

    was placed in a cellulose membrane (MWCO 12,000, Spectrum

    Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA), dialyzed againstdistilled water for 5 days, and freeze-dried. The NAcHis content

    in the conjugate was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

    Fig. 1. Schematic representation of endosomal escape and drug release of histidylated polymer nanoparticles. The pH-dependent endosomal-membrane destabilization

    by histidine correlated with the protonation of its imidazole groups. The pKaof the imidazole group is around 6.5. In a slightly acidic milieu, such as in endosomes, the

    imidazole group is protonated, interacts with negatively charged lipid bilayers and induces the influx of water and ions into endosomes, thus causing endosomedestabilization and drug release into the cytosol.

    38 J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    3/9

    To label NAcHis-GCconjugates with FITC, NAcHis-GC(0.5 g)

    was suspended in 100 ml of bicarbonate buffer (0.1 M Na2CO3,

    0.1 M NaHCO3, pH 9.5), FITC was added, and the suspension wasstirred for 24 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was

    dialyzed for 4 days against 50% ethanol and lyophilized. The FITC

    content in labeled NAcHis-GC was determined fluorometrically

    (ISS K2, Champaign, IL, USA), based on the standard curve

    obtained from FITC alone, with excitation and emission wave-

    lengths of 495 and 520 nm, respectively.

    2.3. Preparation and characterization of NAcHis-GC self-

    assembled nanoparticles

    NAcHis-GC conjugates were suspended in PBS, and each

    suspension was sonicated for 2 min using a probe-type sonicator

    (Ultrasonic Processor GEX-600, Sigma) at 90 W, in which thepulse was turned off for 1 s with an interval of 5 s. The nano-

    particle suspensions were passed through a cellulose acetate

    syringe filter (pore size 0.80 m, Millipore, Billerica, MA,

    USA) and freeze-dried. The lyophilized samples were well-

    suspended again in aqueous media.

    To determine the particle size and size distribution of self-

    assembled nanoparticles, dynamic light scattering (DLS) mea-

    surements were performed using a helium ion laser system

    (Spectra Physics Laser Model 127-35, Mountain View, CA),

    which was operated at 633 nm and 251 C. The scattered light

    was measured at an angle of 90 and was collected with a

    Brookhaven BI-9000AT autocorrelator (Holtsville, NY). Thehydrodynamic diameter of nanoparticles was calculated by the

    Stokes-Einstein equation.

    2.4. Drug loading into self-assembled nanoparticles

    NAcHis-GC nanoparticles (10 mg) were suspended in PBS

    (1 ml) with gentle shaking for 3 h, PTX (0.1 mg) in 100 l

    chloroform was slowly added, and the suspension was stirred

    for 24 h. The chloroform was evaporated, and the suspension

    was centrifuged to remove PTX precipitates. The supernatant

    was collected, passed through a cellulose acetate syringe filter

    (pore size 0.80 m, Millipore) and freeze-dried. DiI-loadednanoparticles were prepared in a similar manner. PTX and DiI

    contents in nanoparticles were measured using HPLC and a

    fluorometer, respectively [25].

    2.5. Cell culture

    HeLa (human epithelioid cervical cancer cell line) and A549

    (human lung cancer cell line), obtained from the American Type

    Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), were routine-

    ly cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% heat-inact-

    ivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin

    at 37 C, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity. The MDA-MB231 human

    breast cancer cell line (ATCC) was cultured in DMEM/F12supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at

    37 C, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.

    Table 1

    Characteristics of self-assembled nanoparticles

    Samplea XHa (wt.%) XF

    b (wt.%) Dc (nm) 2/2 d

    NAcHis-GC-1 6.8 0.65 250 23 nm 0.19 0.04

    NAcHis-GC-2 7.8 0.60 150 18 nm 0.16 0.02

    NAcHis-GC-3 8.7 0.55 170 15 nm 0.15 0.03

    The sample volume and polymer concentration were 1 ml and 5.0 mg/ml fordynamic light scattering measurement, respectively.a Weight percentage of N-acetyl histidine determined by 1H-NMR spectro-

    scopy.b Weight percentage of FITC determined with a UVVis spectrophotometer.c Mean diameter in PBS (pH 7.4), measured by dynamic light scattering.

    Each value represents the meanSD (n =5).d Polydispersity factor, calculated from the cumulant method, where 2 is the

    second cumulant of the decay function and is the average characteristic line

    width. Each value represents the meanSD (n=5).

    Fig. 2. Size distribution of NAcHis-GC-2 self-assembled nanoparticles in PBS(pH 7.4), as measured by dynamic light scattering.

    Fig. 3. Intracellular uptake of NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles. HeLa cells were

    incubated in the presence of NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles at different

    concentrations (0.010.2 mg/ml) for 6 h. After repeated washing to remove

    free nanoparticles, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify cellularuptake.

    39J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    4/9

    2.6. Cellular uptake of FGC nanoparticles

    Cells were plated in a 6-well culture dish and cultured at 37 C

    in 5% CO2 until 80% confluent. Cells were rinsed twice and pre-

    incubated for 1 h with 2 ml of serum-free medium at 37 C. FITC-

    labeled NAcHis-GC nanoparticles were added at a particle

    concentration of 0.01 mg/ml to 0.2 mg/ml and incubated at 37 C

    for 10 min to 6 h. The cells were washed three times with 1 ml of

    PBS (pH 7.4) to remove any free FGC nanoparticles, detached

    with 0.25% trypsin, and centrifuged at 1200 rpm. Supernatants

    were discarded, and the particles were re-suspended with PBS

    containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were fixed

    in 3.7% paraformaldehyde solution at 4 C, washed three times

    with PBS, suspended in PBS, and then introduced into a

    FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA,

    USA) equippedwith a 488-nm argon ion laser. The data presented

    are the mean fluorescent signals for 10,000 cells.

    2.7. Confocal microscopy

    Cells were seeded into 8-well chambers (Lab-TekR, Nalge

    Nunc International, Naperville, IL, USA) (105 cells/cm2, 300 l

    media/well) and incubated overnight at 37 C and 5% CO2.

    Cells were rinsed twice, pre-incubated at 37 C for 1 h in serum-

    free medium, and incubated at 37 C in the presence of FITC-

    labeled NAcHis-GC nanoparticles (final particle concentration,

    0.2 mg/ml) for 10 min to 6 h. The free nanoparticles were

    aspirated, and thecells were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4)

    containing 0.1% BSA and fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde

    solution at 4 C for 15 min. The samples were mounted in fluor-

    escent mounting medium (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), andfluorescence was monitored in two channels: green (for FITC;

    excitation 490 nm, emission 520 nm) and red (for DiI; excitation

    549 nm, emission 565 nm). The images were acquired using a

    confocal microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE 2000, Tokyo, Japan).

    2.8. Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry [27,28]

    Cells were plated in a 6-well culture dish and cultured at 37 C

    in 5% CO2 until 80% confluent. Cells were rinsed twice and pre-

    incubated for 1 h with 2 ml of serum-free medium at 37 C, and

    incubated with PTX-loaded NAcHis-GC nanoparticles at 37 C

    for 30min to24 h. The cells werewashed three times with 1 mlof

    PBS (pH 7.4), harvested by trypsinization, washed once withPBS, and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol. The cells were washed

    with PBS to remove residual ethanol, pelleted, and re-suspended

    in propidium iodide (PI) stain buffer (50g/mlDNase-freeRNase

    A and 50 g/ml PI in PBS) for 30 min, and the samples were

    analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer.

    3. Results

    3.1. Preparation and characterization of NAcHis-GC self-

    assembled nanoparticles

    The amphiphilic GC derivative was prepared by conjugationof hydrophobic NAcHis onto hydrophilic GC through the

    formation of an amide bond. The NAcHis contents in the con-

    jugates were 6.88.7 wt.%, as measured by 1H-NMR spec-

    troscopy (Table 1). When the amphiphilic conjugates were

    dispersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and

    sonicated, the conjugates formed self-assembled nanoparticles

    with mean diameters of 150250 nm as determined by dynamic

    light scattering (Fig. 2 and Table 1). However, when the pH

    of the medium was lowered to 6.0, dynamic light scattering did

    not give any signal indicating the presence of nanoparticles,

    suggesting that these self-assembled nanoparticles dissociate in

    acidic pH due to loss of hydrophobicity caused by the pro-

    tonation of imidazole groups.

    Fig. 4. Endocytosis/exocytosis of NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles. HeLa cells were

    incubated in the presence of nanoparticles for 10 min to 6 h, washed, and

    incubated in fresh medium for an additional 30 min.

    40 J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    5/9

    3.2. Time- and concentration-dependent uptake of

    nanoparticles

    To monitor cellular internalization of NAcHis-GC nanopar-

    ticles, they were labeled with FITC. The FITC contents in the

    nanoparticles were 0.550.65 wt.% (Table 1). As determined by

    fluorescence flow cytometry, cellular internalization of the

    FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC nanoparticles was very rapid. Nano-

    particle uptake was both time- and concentration-dependent,

    and saturation of uptake was achieved in 6 h ( Fig. 3).

    3.3. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles

    To investigate the dynamics of endocytosis and exocytosis,

    cells were incubated with FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC nanopar-

    ticles for 10 min to 6 h, the free nanoparticles were removed,

    and the cells were incubated in fresh medium for an additional

    30 min. When the pre-incubation times were relatively short,

    10 min and 30 min, a large amount of the nanoparticles wasexocytosed after the removal of nanoparticles from the external

    media (Fig. 4). However, the amount of extocytosed nanopar-

    ticles decreased with increasing pre-incubation time, up to 6 h.

    3.4. Release of model drugs from nanoparticles

    The red-fluorescent dye DiI was used as a model drug to

    study in vitro drug release from nanoparticles inside cells. DiI

    was incorporated into NAcHis-GC nanoparticles by the emul-

    sion/solvent evaporation method [26]. When the feed weight

    ratio of DiI to NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles was 0.01, the load-

    ing content of DiI was 0.0094 (0.94 wt.%), representing a 94%

    loading efficiency. Flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 5) and

    Fig. 5. DiI release from NAcHis-GC nanoparticles. HeLa cells were incubated in the presence of DiI-loaded, FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC-1 (A) and NAcHis-GC-2 (B)

    nanoparticles for 10 min to 6 h. After repeated washings to remove free nanoparticles, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    41J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    6/9

    confocal microscopy (Fig. 6) were used to evaluate the

    efficiency of nanoparticles for cellular delivery of DiI.

    DiI is a lipophilic tracer. It is weakly fluorescent in aqueous

    environment. When DiI is incorporated into nanoparticles in

    aqueous environment, it is virtually non-fluorescent. However,

    it is highly fluorescent when incorporated into lipid membranes.

    That is, DiI undergoes fluorescence enhancement upon in-sertion into lipid membranes such as plasma, endosome, and

    lysosome membranes. Ten minutes after the treatment of the

    cells with nanoparticles, significant green fluorescence, indic-

    ative of the NAcHis-GC nanoparticles, was detected, whereas

    red fluorescence, indicative of DiI release from the nanoparti-

    cles, was barely detectable (Fig. 5). Red fluorescence intensity

    increased with time, indicating that DiI was released from the

    nanoparticles and transferred into membranes (Fig. 5). Confocal

    imaging (Fig. 6) confirmed the cellular internalization of DiI-

    loaded NAcHis-GC nanoparticles and DiI release into the

    cytoplasm. When HeLa cells were incubated with DiI-loaded

    nanoparticles for 10 min, red fluorescence from DiI was barelydetected in the cells and only weak green fluorescence were

    observed in the cell membranes. After 6 h, however, red fluor-

    escence was clearly observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6C). For

    comparison, DiI and FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC nanoparticles

    were separately added to the media and incubated with cells for

    10 min to 6 h (Fig. 6D-F). At 10 min, selective staining of the

    cell membranes by DiI was observed. At 6 h, however, DiI and

    FITC-labeled nanoparticles were separately distributed in cells;

    most of the DiI was present in the cell membranes, whereas the

    nanoparticles were distributed throughout the cytoplasm as well

    as in the cell membranes. In contrast, when DiI was delivered

    with NAcHis-GC nanoparticles, a large amount of DiI was ob-

    served in the cytoplasm.

    3.5. Effect of nanoparticles on cell cycle arrest

    PTX was incorporated into NAcHis-GC nanoparticles by the

    emulsion/solvent evaporation method [26]. At a feed weight ratio

    of PTX to NAcHis-GC-1 and NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles of

    0.01, the loading contents of PTX was 0.64 and 0.61 wt.%,

    representing a loading efficiency of 64% and 61%, respectively.

    Uptake of PTX-loaded nanoparticles by A549 and MDA-MB231

    cells and subsequent PTX release into the cytosol caused cell

    cycle arrest in the G2-M phase (Fig. 7, Table 2). In A549 cells, the

    G2-M population gradually increased over time, from 10% at zerotime to around 70% at 24 h, indicating that PTX-loaded NAcHis-

    GC nanoparticles release PTX, which arrests cell growth. A

    similar tendency was observed in MDA-MB231 cells. There was

    no significant difference between NAcHis-GC-1 and NAcHis-

    GC-2 nanoparticles.

    4. Discussion

    NAcHis-GC self-assembled nanoparticles were designed to

    destabilize endosomal membranes, favoring the delivery of

    drugs into the cytosol. A proposed model illustrating the cellular

    internalization and drug release of the nanoparticles is shown in

    Fig. 8.Cellular internalization is initiated by nonspecific interac-

    tions between nanoparticles and cell membranes. A549 cell

    uptake of chitosan nanoparticles was reported to occur pre-

    dominantly by adsorptive endocytosis, mediated in part by

    clathrin, but not by passive diffusion or by fluid-phase endo-

    cytosis [29]. Cellular uptake of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles also

    seems to occur by adsorptive endocytosis initiated by non-

    specific interactions between nanoparticles and cell membranes.

    Even in the absence of ligand binding to specific cell membrane

    receptors, cellular uptake of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles was

    initiated rapidly, within 10 min. Chitosan, which has a positive

    zeta potential, can interact with cell membranes expressing ne-gative zeta potential by nonspecific electrostatic interactions

    [30], and there have been no reports of chitosan-specific re-

    ceptors on cell membranes.

    NAcHis-GC nanoparticles internalized by adsorptive endo-

    cytosis appear to be exocytosed (Fig. 8A) or localized in

    endosomes (Fig. 8B). Unexpectedly, exocytosis of nanoparti-

    cles was fairly active following the removal of nanoparticles

    from the external media. Even after long pre-incubation time

    (6 h), many nanoparticles were still exocytosed. (Fig. 4). Exo-

    cytosis of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles was dependent on the pre-

    incubation time. The amounts of exocytosed nanoparticles de-

    creased with increasing the pre-incubation time, indicating that

    exocytosis is dependent on the progress of endocytosis.

    Fig. 6. Confocal images of HeLa cells. Cells were incubated in the presence of

    DiI-containing, FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles for 10 min (A), 1 h

    (B), and 6 h (C). Confocal images were obtained from two channels and

    overlaid: green, indicative of FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles

    (excitation 490 nm, emission 520 nm) and red, indicative of DiI (excitation

    549 nm, emission 565 nm). (DF) DiI and FITC-labeled NAcHis-GC-2

    nanoparticles were separately added to the media and cells were incubated for

    10 min (D), 1 h (E), and 6 h (F). (For interpretation of the references to colour inthis figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

    42 J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    7/9

    Fig. 7. Cell cycle distribution of A549 (A and B) and MDA-MB231 (C and D) cells. Cells were incubated in the presence of PTX-loaded NAcHis-GC-1 nanoparticles

    (A, C) or PTX-loaded NAcHis-GC-2 nanoparticles (B, D), and analyzed by flow cytometry. The equivalent PTX concentration was 0.3 g/ml.

    43J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    8/9

    Although about 65% of the internalized fraction of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles were found to un-

    dergo exocytosis within 30 min [31], the dependence of exo-

    cytosis on the pre-incubation time was contrary to that reported

    here. That is, whereas pre-incubation time had little effect on the

    exocytosis of PLGA nanoparticles, it has a significant effect on

    the exocytosis of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles. This was probably

    due to the different natures of the respective nanoparticles.

    Once drug-loaded nanoparticles are localized in endosomes,

    they should overcome the endosomal membrane and translocate

    the drugs to the cytosol. This is especially important if the drugs

    are sensitive to lysosomal enzymes. To facilitate escape fromthe endocytotic pathway to lysosomes and transfer more drugs

    into the cytosol, we used N-acetyl histidine as the hydrophobic

    moiety of self-assembled nanoparticles. N-acetyl histidine is

    hydrophobic at neutral pH, and, when conjugated to hydrophilic

    glycol chitosan, the amphiphilic conjugate formed nano-sized

    self-aggregates, similar to other hydrophobically-modified chi-

    tosans such as deoxycholic acid-modified [20,21,32], cholanic

    acid-modified [23], and adriamycin-conjugated chitosans [22].

    At neutral pH, NAcHis-GC formed self-assembled nanoparti-

    cles with mean diameters of 150250 nm, but at acidic pH (4.0

    Table 2

    Cell cycle distribution (10,000 cells/count)

    A549 MDA-MB231

    Treatment Cell cycle distribution % Treatment Cell cycle distribution %

    G0-G1 S G2-M G0-G1 S G2-M

    30 min Control 46.86 43.14 10.01 30 min Control 52.29 38.62 9.09 NAcHis-GC-1 47.77 44.84 7.39 NAcHis-GC-1 56.65 35.70 7.65

    NAcHis-GC-2 47.43 44.90 7.67 NAcHis-GC-2 55.77 36.38 7.85

    1 h NAcHis-GC-1 50.83 37.46 11.72 1 h NAcHis-GC-1 56.93 35.82 7.26

    NAcHis-GC-2 50.40 37.68 11.92 NAcHis-GC-2 57.97 33.18 8.84

    6 h NAcHis-GC-1 37.78 40.31 21.91 6 h NAcHis-GC-1 39.51 40.30 20.19

    NAcHis-GC-2 39.21 38.21 22.58 NAcHis-GC-2 39.49 39.06 21.45

    12 h Control 66.98 20.9 12.12 12 h Control 58.24 22.21 19.56

    NAcHis-GC-1 30.73 26.96 42.31 NAcHis-GC-1 37.33 23.97 38.69

    NAcHis-GC-2 31.21 28.19 40.60 NAcHis-GC-2 35.78 23.58 40.63

    24 h Control 74.57 18.64 6.78 24 h Control 74.65 15.64 9.42

    NAcHis-GC-1 12.59 14.66 72.75 NAcHis-GC-1 29.08 7.84 63.07

    NAcHis-GC-2 13.39 14.82 71.79 NAcHis-GC-2 28.62 8.31 63.07

    Fig. 8. Schematic representation of a proposed model for the cellular internalization and drug release of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles. (A) Internalization of NAcHis-GC

    nanoparticles is initiated by nonspecific interactions between nanoparticles and cell membranes, adsorptive endocytosis. (B) A part of the nanoparticles is exocytosed.

    (C) Without a specific mechanism for endosomal escape, drug-loaded nanoparticles are trafficked to lysosomes, where a high level of lysosomal enzymes is present.

    Drugs sensitive to these enzymes are degraded and lose their activity. (D) Under slightly acidic environments in endosomes, the imidazole group of histidine isprotonated, causing the disruption of endosomal membranes and simultaneous delivery of drugs into the cytosol.

    44 J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745

  • 8/7/2019 N-acetyl histidine glycol chitosan

    9/9

    6.0), light scattering measurements showed no evidence for the

    presence of nanoparticles, indicating that the nanoparticles were

    disassembled at acid pH due to the protonation of imidazole

    groups and subsequent loss of hydrophobicity. The disassembly

    of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles at acidic pH may provide a me-

    chanism for escape from the acidic endo-lysosome compart-

    ments and release of drugs into the cytosol.Flow cytometry analysis and confocal microscopy con-

    firmed this chain of cellular events, including the internalization

    of NAcHis-GC nanoparticles and drug release into the cytosol.

    Moreover, cell cycle analysis demonstrated that PTX was

    released into the cytosol from NAcHis-GC nanoparticles and

    was effective in reducing cell growth. These findings indicate

    that NAcHis-GC nanoparticles may be promising vehicles for

    intracytoplasmic delivery of drugs, proteins, and genes.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was financially supported by the Asan Institutefor Life Sciences (Grant No. 2006-395) and the Ministry of

    Science and Technology (Grant No. M10414030002-05N1403-

    00240) in Korea.

    References

    [1] S.M. Moghimi, A.C. Hunter, J.C. Murray, Long-circulating and target-

    specific nanoparticles: theory to practice, Pharmacol. Rev. 53 (2001)

    283318.

    [2] T.A. Jones, M. Gumbleton, R. Duncan, Understanding endocytotic

    pathways and intracellular trafficking: a prerequisite for effective design

    of advanced drug delivery systems, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55 (2003)

    13531357.

    [3] Y.W. Cho, J.-D. Kim, K. Park, Polycation gene delivery systems: escapefrom endosomes to cytosol, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 55 (2003) 721734.

    [4] Y. Bae, S. Fukushima, A. Harada, K. Kataoka, Design of environment-

    sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: poly-

    meric micelles that areresponsiveto intracellular pH change, Angew. Chem.,

    Int. Ed. 42 (2003) 46404643.

    [5] S. Fukushima, K. Miyata, N. Nishiyama, N. Kanayama, Y. Yamasaki, K.

    Kataoka, PEGylated polyplex micelles from triblock catiomers with

    spatially ordered layering of condensed pDNA and buffering units for

    enhanced intracellular gene delivery, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005)

    28102811.

    [6] M. Oishi, F. Nagatsugi, S. Sasaki, Y. Nagasaki, K. Kataoka, Smart polyion

    complex micelles for targeted intracellular delivery of PEGylated antisense

    oligonucleotides containing acid-labile linkages, ChembioChem 6 (2005)

    718725.

    [7] Y. Bae, N. Nishiyama, S. Fukushima, H. Koyama, M. Yasuhiro, K. Kataoka,Preparationand biologicalcharacterization of polymeric micelledrug carriers

    with intracellular pH-triggered drug release property: tumor permeability,

    controlled subcellular drug distribution, and enhanced in vivo antitumor

    efficacy, Bioconjug. Chem. 16 (2005) 122130.

    [8] E.S. Lee, K. Na, Y.H. Bae, Super pH-sensitive multifunctional polymeric

    micelle, Nano Lett. 5 (2005) 325329.

    [9] P.S. Uster, D.W. Deamer, pH-dependent fusion of liposomes using

    titratable polycations, Biochemistry 24 (1985) 18.

    [10] C.-Y. Wang, L. Huang, Polyhistidine mediates an acid-dependent fusion of

    negatively charged liposomes, Biochemistry 23 (1984) 44094416.

    [11] C. Pichon, M.B. Roufai, M. Monsigny, P. Midoux, Histidylated oligolysines

    increase the transmembrane passage and the biological activity of antisense

    oligonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 504512.

    [12] P. Midoux, M. Monsigny, Efficient gene transfer by histidylated

    polylysine/pDNA complexes, Bioconjug. Chem. 10 (1999) 406

    411.

    [13] M.B. Roufai, P. Midoux, Histidylated polylysine as DNA vector: elevation

    of the imidazole protonation and reduced cellular uptake without change in

    the polyfection efficiency of serum negative polyplexes, Bioconjug. Chem.

    12 (2001) 9299.

    [14] D.W. Pack, D. Putnam, R. Langer, Design of imidazole-containing endo-

    somolytic biopolymers for gene delivery, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 67 (2000)

    217223.

    [15] A.L. Read, S. Singh, Z. Ahmed, M. Stevenson, S.S. Briggs, D. Oupicky,L.B. Barrett, R. Spice, M. Kendall, M. Berry, J.A. Preeece, A. Logan,

    L.W. Seymour, A versatile reducible polycation-based system for ef-

    ficient delivery of a broad range of nucleic acids, Nucleic Acids Res.

    33 (2005) e86.

    [16] E.S. Lee, H.J. Shin, K. Na, Y.H. Bae, Poly(L-histidine)-PEG block

    copolymer micelles and pH-induced destabilization, J. Control. Release 90

    (2003) 363374.

    [17] E.S. Lee, K. Na, Y.H. Bae, Polymeric micelle for tumor pH and folate-

    mediated targeting, J. Control. Release 91 (2003) 103113.

    [18] E.S. Lee, K. Na, Y.H. Bae, Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive polymeric

    micelles for reversal of resistant MCF-7 tumor, J. Control. Release 103

    (2005) 405418.

    [19] K.Y. Lee, W.H. Jo, I.C. Kwon, Y.-H. Kim, S.Y. Jeong, Structure determination

    and interior polarity of self-aggregates prepared from deoxycholic acid-

    modified chitosan in water, Macromolecules 31 (1998) 378

    383.[20] K.Y. Lee, W.H. Jo, I.C. Kwon, Y.-H. Kim, S.Y. Jeong, Physicochemical

    characteristics of self-aggregates of hydrophobically modified chitosans,

    Langmuir 14 (1998) 23292332.

    [21] K.Y. Lee, I.C. Kwon, Y.H. Kim, W.H. Jo, S.Y. Jeong, Preparation of

    chitosan self-aggregates as a gene delivery system, J. Control. Release 51

    (1998) 213220.

    [22] Y.J. Son, J.-S.Jang, Y.W. Cho,H. Chung, R.-W. Park, I.C.Kwon, I.-S. Kim,

    J.-Y. Park, S.B. Seo, C.R. Park, S.Y. Jeong, Biodistribution and anti-tumor

    efficacy of doxorubicin loaded glycol-chitosan nanoaggregates by EPR

    effect, J. Control. Release 91 (2003) 135145.

    [23] J.H. Park, S. Kwon, J.-O. Nam, R.-W. Park, H. Chung, S.B. Seo, I.-S. Kim,

    I.C. Kwon, S.Y. Jeong, Self-assembled nanoparticles based on glycol

    chitosan bearing 5-cholanic acid for RGD peptide delivery, J. Control.

    Release 95 (2004) 579588.

    [24] K. Park, K. Kim, I.C. Kwon, S.K. Kim, S. Lee, D.Y. Lee, Y. Byun,Preparation and characterization of self-assembled nanoparticles of

    heparin-deoxycholic acid conjugates, Langmuir 20 (2004) 1172611731.

    [25] J.-H. Kim, Y.-S. Kim, S. Kim, J.H. Park, K. Kim, K. Choi, H. Chung,

    S.Y. Jeong, R.-W. Park, I.-S. Kim, I.C. Kwon, Hydrophobically modified

    glycol chitosan nanoparticles as carriers for paclitaxel, J. Control. Release

    111 (2006) 228234.

    [26] M. Lee, Y.W. Cho, J.H. Park, H. Chung, S.Y. Jeong, K. Choi, D.H. Moon,

    S.Y. Kim, I.-S. Kim, I.C. Kwon, Size control of self-assembled nano-

    particles by an emulsion/solvent evaporation method, Colloid Polym. Sci.

    284 (2006) 506512.

    [27] P. Giannakakou, R. Robey, T. Fojo, M.V. Blagosklonny, Low concentra-

    tions of paclitaxel induce cell type-dependent p53, p21 and G1/G2 arrest of

    mitotic arrest: molecular determinants of paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity,

    Oncogene 20 (2001) 38063813.

    [28] Y. Mo, L.-Y. Lim, Palitaxel-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: potentiation ofanticancer activity by surface conjugation with wheat germ agglutinin,

    J. Control. Release 108 (2005) 244262.

    [29] M. Huang, Z. Ma, E. Khor, L.-Y. Lim, Uptake of FITC-chitosan

    nanoparticles by A549 cells, Pharm. Res. 19 (2002) 14881494.

    [30] N.G.M. Schipper, S. Olsson, J.A. Hoogstraate, A.G. deBoer, K.M. Varum,

    P. Artursson, Chitosan as absorption enhancers for poorly absorbable drug

    2: mechanism of absorption enhancement, Pharm. Res. 14 (1997)

    923929.

    [31] J. Panyam, V. Labhasetwar, Dynamics of endocytosis and exocytosis of

    poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles in vascular smooth muscle

    cells, Pharm. Res. 20 (2003) 212220.

    [32] K. Kim, S. Kwon, J.H. Park, H. Chung, S.Y. Jeong, I.C. Kwon, I.-S. Kim,

    Physicochemical characterizations of self-assembled nanoparticles of

    glycol chitosan-deoxycholic acid conjugates, Biomacromolecules 6

    (2005) 1154

    1158.

    45J.S. Park et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 115 (2006) 3745