my conflicts of interest are…
DESCRIPTION
Cypher in AMI Summary of Trial Evidence Dr Steve Fearn Director of Health Economics and Medical Affairs Cordis UK. My conflicts of interest are…. I am employed by Cordis I hold J&J stock. Approved indications. Cypher has a specific CE mark for use in AMI. Also: De novo lesions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ground breaking, Life changing™
Cardiology
Cypher in AMI
Summary of Trial Evidence
Dr Steve FearnDirector of Health Economics and Medical Affairs
Cordis UK
My conflicts of interest are…
• I am employed by Cordis
• I hold J&J stock
Approved indications
• Cypher has a specific CE mark for use in AMI.
• Also:– De novo lesions– In-stent restenosis– Small vessels (to 2.25mm)– Diabetes– Multivessel disease– Bifurcations– CTO– Infrapopliteal lesions
Important Questions
• Is Cypher safe in AMI patients
– Death, further MI, stent thrombosis?
• Does Cypher reduce the rate of repeat revascularisation?
• What about the longer-term?
• What about cost-effectiveness
Most Recent Data Synthesis
Kastrati et al EHJ 2007;28:2706-13
Diaz de la Llera
120 65.5 SES Death, MI or TVR1m BMS
9m SES
12m
(planned)
MULTI-STRATEGY
744 63.8 SES Death, MI or TVR 3m8m
(planned)
Abstracts
Detailed summary data on 2,381 patients randomised to BMS or Cypher
Ground breaking, Life changing™
Cardiology
Cypher-specific Trials
N 744 175 320 712 310 120
Follow up 8m 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y
Months planned dual APT 3 3 12 6 12 9
Cypher in AMI: All-cause Mortality
All-cause Mortality
3.0%
8.0%
1.9%1.3%
5.0%
4.0%
9.1%
4.4%
2.6%3.3%
2.3% 2.2%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
MULT
ISTRATEG
Y
STRATEGY
SESAMI
TYPHOO
N
MIS
SION
Diaz d
e la
Llera
Eve
nt R
ate
Cypher
BMS
Cypher in AMI: All-cause Mortality
Study nameOutcomeTime pointStatistics for each studyEvents / TotalOdds ratio and 95% CI
Odds Lower Upper ratiolimitlimitCypherBMS
STRATEGYDeath12m0.880.302.537 / 878 / 88
SESAMIDeath12m0.420.111.643 / 1607 / 160
TYPHOONDeath12m1.010.372.718 / 3558 / 357
MISSIONDeath12m0.470.092.632 / 1584 / 152
Diaz et alDeath12m1.530.259.483 / 602 / 60
MULTISTRATEGYDeath8m 0.730.331.6011 / 37215 / 372
0.770.491.2234 / 119244 / 1189
0.10.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours CypherFavours BMS
Meta Analysis
p (overall effect) = 0.27Heterogeneity (I2) = 0.0%
RR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.22)
Cypher in AMI: Further MI
N 744 175 320 712 310 120
Follow up 8m 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y
Months planned dual APT 3 3 12 6 12 9
Further MI
3.2%
6.9%
1.9%1.1%
5.7%
1.7%
4.6%
9.1%
1.4%
9.2%
1.9% 1.7%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
MULT
ISTRATEG
Y
STRATEGY
SESAMI
TYPHOO
N
MIS
SION
Diaz d
e la
Llera
Eve
nt R
ate
Cypher
BMS
Cypher in AMI: Further MI
Study nameOutcomeTime pointStatistics for each studyEvents / TotalOdds ratio and 95% CI
Odds Lower Upper ratiolimitlimitCypherBMS
STRATEGYMI 12m0.740.252.236 / 878 / 88
SESAMIMI 12m1.000.205.033 / 1603 / 160
TYPHOONMI 12m0.800.213.014 / 3555 / 357
MISSIONMI 12m0.600.251.429 / 15814 / 152
Diaz et alMI 12m1.000.0616.371 / 601 / 60
MULTISTRATEGYMI 8m 0.700.331.4812 / 37217 / 372
0.710.451.1135 / 119248 / 1189
0.10.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours CypherFavours BMS
Meta Analysis
p (overall effect) = 0.14Heterogeneity (I2) = 0.0%
RR = 0.72 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.11)
Cypher in AMI: Stent Thrombosis
N 744 175 320 712 310 120
Follow up 8m 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y
Months planned dual APT 3 3 12 6 12 9
Stent Thrombosis
2.7%
1.1% 1.3%
3.4%
1.3%
3.3%
4.0%
4.5%
0.6%
3.6%
2.0%1.7%
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
4%
5%
5%
Eve
nt R
ate
Cypher
BMS
def+prob
def+prob
def
protocol
protocol
def
Cypher in AMI: Stent Thrombosis
Study name Outcome Time point Statistics for each study Events / Total Odds ratio and 95% CI
Odds Lower Upper ratio limit limit Cypher BMS
STRATEGY Stent thrombosis 12m 0.24 0.03 2.23 1 / 87 4 / 88
SESAMI Stent thrombosis 12m 2.01 0.18 22.42 2 / 160 1 / 160
TYPHOON Stent thrombosis 12m 0.93 0.42 2.06 12 / 355 13 / 357
MISSION Stent thrombosis 12m 0.64 0.10 3.86 2 / 158 3 / 152
Diaz et al Stent thrombosis 12m 2.03 0.18 23.06 2 / 60 1 / 60
MULTISTRATEGY Stent thrombosis 8m 0.66 0.29 1.48 10 / 372 15 / 372
0.79 0.48 1.30 29 / 1192 37 / 1189
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours Cypher Favours BMS
p (overall effect) = 0.35Heterogeneity (I2) = 0.0%
RR = 0.79 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.29)
Cypher in AMI: TVR
N 744 175 320 712 310 120
Follow up 8m 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y 1Y
Months dual APT 3 3 12 6 12 9
% Angio follow up 0.0 90.9 51.9 24.3 82.3 0.0
TVR
3.2%
6.9%
5.0% 5.6% 5.1%
0.0%
10.2%
20.5%
13.8% 13.4% 13.2%
5.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
MULT
ISTRATEG
Y
STRATEGY
SESAMI
TYPHOO
N
MIS
SION
Diaz d
e la
Llera
Eve
nt R
ate
Cypher
BMS
Cypher in AMI: TVR
Study nameOutcomeTime pointStatistics for each studyEvents / TotalOdds ratio and 95% CI
Odds Lower Upper ratiolimitlimitCypherBMS
STRATEGYTVR 12m0.290.110.776 / 8718 / 88
SESAMITVR 12m0.330.140.778 / 16022 / 160
TYPHOONTVR 12m0.380.220.6620 / 35548 / 357
MISSIONTVR 12m0.350.150.838 / 15820 / 152
Diaz et alTVR 12m0.140.012.690 / 603 / 60
MULTISTRATEGYTVR 8m 0.290.150.5712 / 37238 / 372
0.330.240.4654 / 1192149 / 1189
0.10.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours CypherFavours BMS
Meta Analysis
p (overall effect) = <0.001Heterogeneity (I2) = 0.0%
RR = 0.37 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.49)
Ground breaking, Life changing™
Cardiology
Longer-term
STRATEGY 2Y
11.5%
8.0%9.2%
1.1% 1.1%0.0%
13.6%
9.1%
23.9%
4.5%
2.3%
0.0%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Death MI TVR ST def+prob ST late ST very late
Eve
nt R
ate
Cypher
BMS
STRATEGY at 2 Years
Valgimigli et al JACC 2007;50:138-45
N = 175
P = 0.66
P = 0.77
P = 0.01
P = 0.37
P = 1.00
TYPHOON @ 3 Years
Spaulding PCR 2008
N = 712
Cost-effectiveness
• Cypher AMI data into economic model that closely reproduces NICE’s results.
• Additional procedural cost of using Cypher = £471.• Costs saved by avoiding adverse events= £435.• 12m incremental cost of using Cypher = £ 36 (a)
• QALYs gained = 0.00691 (b)
• Incremental cost per QALY gained (a/b) = £5,281
(PPCI with BMS vs thrombolysis = £9,241)
Summary
• Death, MI, Stent thrombosis:
– No significant differences between Cypher & BMS.
• TVR:
– Statistically significant 63% risk reduction.
• Longer-term:
– Consistent with 12m conclusions.
• Cost-effective against NICE thresholds.
Ground breaking, Life changing™
Cardiology
Back Up
Meta-analysis Key Results: All DES
Kastrati et al EHJ 2007;28:2706-13
Odds Ratio or Relative Risk?
Dead Alive
DES A B
BMS C D
RR = A/(A+B)C/(C+D)
OR = A/BC/D