museum ordnance jan 96
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
1/30
3.00
January 996
Museum
Ordnance
Thli Magazine for the
U S
Army Ordnance
Museum
Promoting the preservation and colfection
o
information and artifacts
o
military ordnance from around the world
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
2/30
The
leader in defense, aerospace and transportation information.
Jane s products
include
Jane s Fighting
Ships,
Jane s All
The World s
Aircraft and Jane s Defence
Weekly.
Jane s also offers
its
yearbooks,
directories, binders and magazines
in
electronic format.
For a complete product list
r
a CD-ROM sample disc contact:
Jane's
INFORMATION GROUP
1340
Braddock Place, Suite
300
Alexandria, VA 22314-1651
Tel: (703) 683-3700 Fax: (703) 836-0029
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
3/30
Dr. 'Jack' Atwater
The
Curator's
Column
My editor tells
me
that
space is
limited
in this edition and that I am
to
be mindful
of
Shakespeare's dictum
that, , , "Brevity is the soul of wit.
Thereisalotgoingonwithinthe museum
on
the
preservation of our
vehicles
that are stored outside . I
am
reluctant
to write
about
this subject at this time
because
of the many
imponderables
that,
unfortunately,
still exist. Still I
hope to report
some
very exciting and
good newswithin the
next
few months!
I
have been
asked
upon several
occasions
to
write
about
our
medals
display.
t is
one
of
the most colorful
and complete displays we
possess
in
the museum. George Washington
established our
country's
first award
on
7
August 1782. The Badge of
Military Merit was probably the first
offiCial award given to soldiers and
officers
without
regard to
rank.
The
original
award was
a
piece of cloth in
the form
of
a purple heart and is the
forerunner of
the current
medal
re-
ceived for wounds.
The
Medal
of
Honor was
created
during the
Civil
War
but
none of the
other medals of
our
"Pyramidof
Honor"
were
created
un til
1918.
Mili
tary
decorations come in distinctive shapes
a cross, a star, a "starburst: or a
hexagon and are conferred
on
an
indi-
Continued on Page 10
n The Cover
Living
in the past.
Like
many
times before,
American soldiers find themselves fighting
this year's war
with last
year's weapons.
Makeshift
protection
for
security duty.
use
u
Ordnance
Features
Haven't We Learned Anything In The
Past Thirty Years?
By
dam
Geibel
4
More
Syrian
Use of
German
Armor
By LTC. Richard
A.
Williams
7
Armored
Combat of the Nigerian
Civil War 1967-1970
By David Spencer
12
Special Forces/Special Operations Vehicle
HMMWV
16
The Common Chassis Revisited
The U.S.
Army's
Advanced
Field
Artillery
System
"Crusader"
By
Lawrence
D
Bacon
and
Dr Asher
H
Sharoni
17
1995 Editorial
Index 31
Departments
Curator's
Column
3
Bookshelf G-2
1
Book Reviews
SHADOW WAR
The CIA's Secret War in Laos
GERMANYSPANTHERTANK
The Quest
for
Combat Supremacy
11
15
The Ordnance
Museum
Foundation 26
Miniature Ordnance:
Commanders
Model CA.1
Schneider
WWI
French Tank
By
Steve Zaloga
27
Classified
Ads
31
Museum Ordnance
ISS1\ 1083-9577
Volume
6,
Number 1
January 1996
Jeffrey
D. McKaughan
Editor
Adam Geibel
Associate Editor
Jan
uary 1996
Museum Ordnance is published six·times per year by Darlington Productions, Inc. , P.O. Box 5884, Darlington,
MD
21034. (410) 457·5400. AU righls are reserved. Copyright 1996.
No
part
of
this publication may be copied or
reproduced without the expressed wrillen permission
of
the publisher.
This publication serves the interests and needs of the U.S.Army Ordnance Museum at Aberdeen Proving Ground,
Aberdeen, MD.
Subscriptions: One-year (six issues)
is
$17.00 (Maryland residents add 5% sales tax).
AU
foreign subscriptions :
$20.00 surface, $30.00 airmail. Payment must be
in
U.S. funds. Make
aU
checks or money orders payable to Museum
Ordnance.
Muse
um
Ord uJnce is not responsible for unsolicited manu scripls, artwork or photos sent to the office. Material
will be returned to the author only if accompanied by a self-addressed stamped envelope. The opinions and views expressed
by the authors do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Army Ordnance Museum, the publisher, or the editor.
3
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
4/30
Haven t We
Learned Anything
In The Last
Thirty Years?
Adam Geibel
In response to Viet Cong ambushes on
supply
convoys.
the
US
Army
In Viet
nam used
field
expedient armor
to pro
tect their trucks. This included sand-
bag lined
cab
floors and
beds to counter
landmines. Th
Irty
years later
US forces
are committed
across the globe. from
Haiti
to Somalia. with
essentially
the
same
unarmored
rear
echelon vehicles
that they
went
to
Vietnam with
Interestingly
enough. these photos
from Haiti
show
that
the
US
Army
is
responding
the same
way.
with the
same technology. While the workman-
ship
displayed
on the
lOth
Mountain
DiVision
truck appears
to
be of the
highest quality. the
real
answer lays
beyond
field expediency.
In
an
era where mine protected
vehicles
-
Including those
specifically
designed
for convoy and resupply
use.
are already available. using thirty
year
old
technology to protect American
sol
:diers is criminally
stupid.
The armored capsule sits in the bed oJ the truck necessitating that the tail gate
remain lower ed to use
the
rear door.
The armor plate
is
supported with
vertica
strutsfixed in
the bed walls,
where
the wooden stake
bodies
are
usually
mounted
Note
method
oj
attaching anti-grenade screen to
armor
plate.
An
uparmored 1 th Mounta in Division five-ton truck taken in Haiti 1994. There are
fiveftring
ports left. right and
rear
Note anti-grenade screen
over
troop compart
ment
4
useum Ordnance
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
5/30
Eve OJ Destruction, a
well-known
five-ton M53 truck ar
moredJor convoy
duty
in Vietnam. Four
M
.50 Brownings
providedmassivesuppressivejirepower,
but
the
truck had no
overhead protect on from handgrenades. US
Army
Three black-spray stenciled insignia,
from
left to
right;
Tri
angle with bullet ricocheting
off oj
curasier s breastplate,
ARPA (Tactical Armor Integration Laboratory) centered on
stylized
globe, Conquest
OJDarkness.
From this angle,
the
anti-grenade
screen
lacing is clearly visible.
An
American
rifleman demonstrating the
use oj
firing port
Note
the method oj
attaching
the
rooJ beams and lateral
reinJorcements to
the one
inch
by
8 inch boards.
January 996
Publisher's Note:
n
March. 1995. at IDEX '95 in Abu Dhabi the South
Africans demonstrated the protection and survivability of their Casspir
Mk. II. For five con secut ve days the Casspir was paraded in front of the
viewing stand before being driven out into the firing range (top photo).
There
it
was dri ven over a landmine and towed back showing the damage
(middle photo). It was then taken to arevetrnent where within 25 minutes
it was repaired and driven back under its own power (bottom photo). The
same vehicle withstood this abuse for five straight days
I spoke with a Canadian businessman who volunteered to sit in the
vehicle as a passenger during the demonstration that these photos were
taken from. Although a rough ride, he and the orthers were not injured
other than being "shaken up."
Why is the U.S. Army still bolting together make-shift protection for
troops in security and patrol operations? While
troops
in the field are
doing what it takes to ensure their safety. off-the-shelf equipment is
available from a number of sources that could do a better job.
"No More Task Force Smiths'" needs
to
e taken a little more
seriously
5
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
6/30
6
Do any
Museum
Ordnance
readers
have
other
photos
or information on either of
the
vehicles
shown
here?
The photo above is obviously
a modified Gennan 251 half
track
with
an
A-frame lift
ing
rig and
built-up super
structure
over
the
body.
t
also appears to have been
pressed
into service by Rus
sian soldiers.
The photo
below
was taken
in a vehicle
park after date
unknown.
useum Ordnance
:
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
7/30
More Syrian
Use ofGerman
rmor
LTC. Richard
A.
Williams
In
more than three years as
an
Assis
tant US Army
Attache in Israel,
I have
made over 150 trips
to the
Golan
Heights.
I
therefore
read Mr.
Steven
Zaloga's fascinating
article
on early
Syrian armor (July 1995) with great
interest.
Since
then, Russ Vaughan
and I have made a trip to another
This destroyed StuG
III
in
a
small dug-
in position,
remains where
it w s de
stroyed.
ABOVE RIGHT:
Cleartracesojzimmerit
coating
are still evident on
the [>-LKpjiv
N
(unlike the tank t
Tel
Aziziatj.
The rubber tires o road wheels
from
both
the Mk N and the StuG
III
were
clearly marked
Hutchinson,
Made
in
France W
proViding
further
evidence o
Steve's comments about France s
source
o
rebuUt
German
vehicles.
January
996
former battlefield location which pro
duced some Interesting finds bearing
on that subject.
The site, known
as
Nuheilla
(or
Nukheila) was a fortified Syrian posi
tion
about one kilometer north
of
Tel
Dan
on
the Israel-Syrian border.
(Is-
raeli armor
buffs
may remember the
area as the scene
of several armor
engagements from
Nov.
1964
through
August 1965
which resulted in and
validated then-Col. Israel Tal's
devel-
opment of long-range
tank
gunnery
techniques, which laid the foundation
for
the outstanding
performance and
reputation of IDF tankers
in
subse
quent
wars
.
*
I had recently
been in
-
formed
by
an
IDF
military historian
that
the position, with which Iwas very
familiar
but had not
previously
visited,
• A
good
source for further
informa
tion
on this series
of
engagements is
the article,
Tel
Dan Incident:
New
Con
cept
in
Israeli
Tank
Warfare, by
Yosef
Argaman
in
the #20 issue (Summer
1990) of the now-defunct lDF
Journal.
formerly published in English by the
Israeli
Ministry
of Defense.
7
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
8/30
The
Syrian Renault 35.R tank at
Degania. mentioned in Mr Zaloga's ar-
ticle. MG Tal said that.
aJew years
ago.
he
settled
a decades-old controversy
over which oJthe deJenders' weapons
had
knocked
outthe tank-a
PIATora
20mmATgun. Using
the
same methods
he pioneered which have been used by
the
IDFOrdnance Corps to analyze thou-
sands oj
other
knocked-out
tanks.
he
conclUSively proved that
the
PIATgun
ner h d been
responsibleJor
the
kilL)
still contained three
Syrian
vehicles.
We hit th e
jackpot;
no t onlydid the
position
contain
another
destroyed
PzKpfw IV Similar. but not identical. to
the
one
at
Tel Aziziat.
but
also a StuG
III. burned
but
basically intact in its
revetment.
The PZKpfw V
clearly
suffered a
catastrophic internal explosion only
the
roof and right side
of
the turret
remain . The tank
appears to
have been
moved from
its
original location and
the gun and possibly the
turret
re-
mains
piled
onto
the wreck of
the
hull.
LEFT: The StuG III
has
been
modlfred
with a mount Jar a heavy MG. as
shown
in Steve s article.
To
the
left
oj
the gun mantlet on
the
StuG III are
two
penetrations. one entr
an d
one exit hole. Apparently. ammunition cooking oJj inside
the
tank during th
ensuing fire caused the exit hole. The entry hit marked the rear oj the fightin
compartment with shrapnel. Two more (Israeli) rounds penetrated to the right
o
the
mantlet.
The
FzKpJw N
at
Tel Aziziat, shown previous in
Steve
Zaloga's article.
Museum Ordnanc
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
9/30
An lDF modified M3
half
track which
remains
where
it was
knocked
out dur
ing the une Golani Brigade attack
on
Tel
Fakher a
stronglyjortlfzed
posi
tion overwatching Tel Aztzlat
from the
east . The.J1.oor o the vehicle is still
covered with lumdreds o casings and
projectiles from
.50
cal. 7.62mm, and
9mmammunitton
that explodedduring
thefire.
BELOW: This photo shows an M4Al
semi·concealed
in a small
park
near
KibbutzEinZiwanon theGolanHeights.
This tank
was ex·
French
Army equip
ment,possibly brought Israel
in
one oJ
the clandestine French arms shipments
prior
to
the
1956 Sinal
invasioTL
The
tank bears
a
partially readable French
data plate inside in headed ·Char
M4Al."
Assuming
that
this tankJought
on
the
Golan in the Six-Day War,
French-supplied Shermans may have
engagedFrench-suppliedGermanequip-
ment. Mod ftcations to
the
basically US-
issue
M4Al
include the Jour turret-
mounted
smoke
grenade
launchers and
a
curious angled port drilled into the
turret
rooJ
near
the mantlet,
possiblyJor
lTing
f lares
from inside
the
tank.
one
of the
tracks
is lying
about fifteen
meters from
the
vehicle. The StuG
seems to
have remained
where it
was
hit, although the
IDF
tank(s)
that
hit t
must
have been
firing
from
an
elevated
position, as
the assault
gun is pro
tected by
a berm
in front of the
vehicle
which
is
higher
than
the location
of
the
hits.
I
hope the above sheds
additional
light on
the
interesting ex-German Syr
ian armor subject.
There
was one
error.
probably a typo
in
Mr.
Zaloga s
article:
The
tank at Tel Aziziat was knocked
out
in
the 1967
war,
not the 1973 war
as
the photo caption says. The
body
of
the
article also mentions the use of the
Mk V on the
Golan Heights
in the
1973 War. The
Heights were in
Israeli
hands
between the 1967
and
1973
wars,
so
any Syrian armor used there
in 173 was part
of the
attacking force.
If
Syria
still had any
Mk
IVs left
by
then, they would certainly have been
In
secondary
or tertiary
lines
of
defense
well inside Syrian
territory.
January
996
9
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
10/30
Curat
or s
COIUIll
D
rContiru Ledfrom Page
3
vidual
for a designated
achievement.
Their achievements can either be in
combat
or
for
noncombatan
t
actions.
The decorations are in distinctive
shapes to distinguish them
from ser
vice
medals which
are circular.
Ser
vice
medals are
awarded
for
a
par
ticular campaign. expedition.
occu
pation duty, or emergency service.
Under normal circumstances "deco
rations"
are
conferred
for a specific
act of
gallantry
and "medals" for
participation
in a deSignated war or
for performing
a
meritorious
service.
This
can
be confusing
because
the
highest decoration awarded
for
gal
lantry is the Medal of
Honor
.
Small auxiliary
insignia are
worn
on the ribbons of medals to
indicate
various
things.
In the
army
a
bronze
oak-leaf indicates a
subsequent
award of
the
same medal. A
silver
oak-leaf
indicates
five identical
awards. Bronze
stars
on
a
campaign
medal indicate participati oninbattles
or various campaigns
within
the
con
text of
the
larger
conflict. A
bronze
"V" is
worn
to
indicate participation
in
combat on the Legion of Merit.
Bronze
Star,
and
Commendation
medals.
A bronze arrowhead
indi
cates
participation
in
an invasion.
Decorations and medals
are
not
"badges."
A
badge
is given for
some
special proficiency, such as marks
manship, parachuting,
being
SCUBA
qualified. or
being an aviator
or a
member
of
a flight
crew.
Decorations
and
medals stand
for more that the Nation's
grateful
acknowledgment offldelity. They are
a constant incentive to performance
of
outstanding deeds. When
Antoine
Thibaudeau. an ardent French revo
lutionary, objected to Napoleon's
awarding
medals as
mere
"baubles",
the
Emperor
replied, "You are
pleased
to call them'baubles;'
well,
t is with
'baubles'
that an army's
esprit
is
maintained and strengthened."
Come and visit us at the Ord
nance
Museum!
Museum Ordnance Bookshelf G 2
news and notes about AFV resources
by
Tom.Laemlein
Back again for
another
round of news and notes on AFV-related
resources
and
entertainment.
The
most
significant
development
of the
fall
has
to
be
Edward R Hamilton's
Superstore
Catalog (Edward R Hamilton Bookseller,
Fall s Village, CT
06031-5000).
Incredible!
Hamilton
is
now
offering
most
of the
SchilTer line of
hardbound
books at significantly reduced prices (Le.:
Rommel In the Desert,
by
Kuhn -
$24.50,
A History of the Panzer Troops,
by Haupt - $17.46). Even better news is his pricing on some
of
Hunnicutt·s
Presidio releases:
Sherman
at $64.95,
Abrams
and
Patton at
$42.00. I've
counted over 20 well-priced books
of
direct interest to
armor
fans in this
catalog. so I strongly
suggest
you get a
copy
and make some cost-effective
additions to your library.
Veteran
armor
author George Forty has two releases this fall. The first,
Tanks: World War Two Fighting Armor ($29.95)
was
mentioned
in
my last
column and is yet to arrive in bookstores. The second:
Tank
Action: From
the
Great War
to
the Gulf
($39.95) has arrived, but Without much fanfare.
That's
unfortunate,
because
It's
an outstanding
work,
with
detailed, well
illustrated
accounts ofvarious
tank
actions throughout the 20th
century.
My copy came from
Zenith
Books (1-800-826-6600).
Panther fans have two new books to choose from
well-establlshed authors.
The first, Germany's
Panther
Tank: The
Quest
For
Combat Supremacy, by
Thomas Jentz
($45.00 Schiffer) is a highly detailed
account,
primarily
of
Panther
deVelopment and production. A solid book with excellent drawings
by H.L. Doyle. (see book review in this issue.) The
other
volume is Panther,
by Uwe
Feist and
Bruce Culver
($75.00
Ryton Publications).
Fans
were
lukewarm
on
their expensive
1992
publication of TIger, so I hope this
Panther
edition (272 pages. over 500 photos and illustrations) breaks some
new ground. Of course, Ryton books are beautifully published.
Motorbooks has released The Imperial
War Museum
Book
ofthe
DesertWar
1940-1942, a well-illustrated, but general
history of that
campaign from a
British
perspective. Motorbooks
has
also published
Mussolini's Soldiers,
by Rex Tyre ($29.95). It's a good start. well-illustrated, but lacks
the
details
on Italian armor
and artillery that
many of us are
looking for.
Last column I mentioned Across The Rhine. a WWII tank simulator for the
PC from MicroProse. Now
comes
Steel
Panthers
from
Strategic
Simulations,
Inc. ($39.95). While Across
the
Rhine tried to be an on-the-battlefield tank
simulator (and
genera lly failed), Steel
Panthers updates older
"board game"
technology, reminiscent
of
Avalon Hill's
Squad
Leader. Offering a top-down
view of outstandin g graphics (plus video footage and digital sound effects)
Steel Panthers Is easy to learn (the
computer
does all
the
math)
and
fun!
Armor
fans will love
the
depth
of historical
de
.tail - including al
~ _ . ~ ~ ~ _ i i i i ~ : l m o s t every major ve
" hicle from
the combat
ant nations of
WWII.
These
t § ~ : ; ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ p e o P l e
have done their home
; "
work. The battle-builder al
lows you to create your own
........ engagements (try Italiansvs.
Japanese armor ifyou
want).
Head-to-
head
modemplay
and
s ~ ~ ~ additional historical scenarios
are coming soon. You'll need a
486/33 PC or
better,
8MB
of RAM
2X CD
ROM, and at least 12MB available hard-drive space.
10
useum
Ordnanc
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
11/30
Museum Ordnance s Bookshelf Book Reviews
SH DOW W R
The CIA's Secret
War
In taos
The CIA's Secret War in Laos
By Kenneth
Conboy
with
James
Morrison
464
pages, photos,
maps
1995 ISBN 0-87364-825-0
Paladin
Press
P.O.
Box
1307
Boulder,
CO 80306
(303) 443-7250
49.95
This
is
a large book:
In
physical size it's
8.5
by 11 inches, in thickness
it's
464
on
previously
known
situations
is punc
pages,
and in content it
is
fully packed
tuated with information
not
disclosed
Indicative
of the
title, the war
in
before.
Laos was
fought
in
the
shadow
of the
The
book begins
just
after
the end
fighting
in Vietnam.
As such, informa
ofWWII.
but
the coverage intensifies in
tion
on
the war
is
hard
to come
by and
the 1950's and continues through to
difficult to research. The
authors spent
1974. The CIA along with
a variety
of
more
than
ten
years
interviewing
par
military
and
civilian
agencies
ran
a
ticipants and combing through
field
large, mostly covert
operation.
This
reports and formerly classified docu
activity
was split between trying to
ments. Their effort pays off for
the
"save" Laos from the evils of commu
reader
as
a
wealth
of
new information
nism
and serving
the larger
plcture in
GERMANrSPANTHERTANK
The
Quest for Combat Supremacy
Thomas Jentz, drawings by Hilary Doyle
156
Pages, 140 Photos,
16 sets
of drawings
plus
35 other drawings, 20 charts
and
graphs
1995
ISBN 0-88740-812-5
Schiffer
Publishing Company
77 Lower Valley
Road
Atglen, PA 19310
45.00
Numerous charts
and
graphs also
Review by Frank De
Sisto
present this
information in an easily
digested
form. This information Is es
Quite
simply, this
new book rendered
pecially useful to
modelers
who wish to
nearly every other
book
ever written on
be able
to
depict
a specific vehicle
at
a
the
Panther
obsolete.
For the first
time
specific
time
and
place
. All of this
the complete genesis of
the
Panther
informatio n is cross-referenced using
a
series
is correctly presented.
system of numbers in a way familiar to
To do
this
the author has con engineers,
an d
easily
used by
the reader.
sulted
with only
original
source
docu The
excellent
selection of
photo
ments and inspected
nearly
every graphs (most of which
are
NOT new)
available
surviving
vehicle on public with
complete captioning,
allow
these
display. Aside from constantly citing
to shed new light on a subject which
documents used throughout the text, many might think is "done to death ."
the
author explains
how
the
use
of
Mr. Doyle's drawings
are
in a
class by
parts
stock
numbers
helped to identity themselves
and cover
many variations
various models of the Panther. All of with
four complete
views.
this
is
presented
in
chronological
order After action
reports by users
and
to show
what
changes were made
and
an
assessment
by American tankers
when they occurred.
give a biased (the author
plainly states
January
1996
Vietnam. This book is full of strategic
level plans, facts,
and
figures
but easily
transitions
to tactical
combat informa
tion and
covert action
details.
Never before known
facts
on White
Star
operations (including
a
gripping
and detailed account of the PAVN as
sault
on
the
UASFTSQ-81
radar
site
at
Phou Phathi),
raids on Dien Bien
Phu
in 1968, the first use of a
homemade
BLU-82 bomb from a C-130, tank
ac
tions with
PT-76's, US-run sites as
basecamps
for
missions Into China,
and
the
war along the Ho Chi
Minh
Trail to name just
a few.
The book includes
a
comprehen
sive index, alongwith a glossary. Nicely
done
maps
are done in a separate
sec
tion
in the back that give basic geogra
phy
and
distance
references,
while
mixed among the text are
several
tacti
cal
maps of various battles.
The
endnotes
are
listed
at
the end of each
chapter and are
extensive
and
informa
tive.
The
endnotes
also take
the
place
of a bibliography. Although I would
have preferred a separate listing of
sources.
the
actual notation would
probably have
been
small
as much of
the
research involved Interviews
with
veterans and participants as opposed
to
books,
reports, and
documents.
The photographs are
best
described
as rare.
even
for someone who
is
a
student
ofIndochina.
They represent a
good
selection
of personalities, eqUip
ment,
locations,
and
actions.
Kenneth Conboy has traveled and
studied this area and this conflict for
many years and his experience
shows.
readers of the Osprey series of books
maybe
familiar
with his
work
as he has
authored
a number
of
subjects cover
ing
Southeast
Asia. James Morrison is
an
ex-Special
Forces
officerwho
served
in Southeast Asia.
This book
is hi hly recommended.
such in his
introduction) but
neverthe
less accurate account
of
the Panther in
battIe.
Production statis t ics ,
units
equipped with the Panther,
and avail
ability and casualty rates allow the
reader
to
draw
his
own conclusions
regarding the
efficiency
of
the
design in
combat. In that respect, the
author
does us a service: he forces us to think
for
ourselves.
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
12/30
Armored
Combat
of
th
e
Nigerian
Civil War
1967-1970
David Spencer
Biafra,
the richest oil-endowed
prov-
ince of
Nigeria
declared independence
from
Nigeria
in
May,
1967.
The war
wasn t only
about oil,
but also tribal
and
religious
domination.
The Biafrans
were
mostly
Ibo and
Christian, while
the
Federalgovernment wa s
dominated
by
Hausa
northerners who were pre
dominantly
Islamic.
The
two and a
half
year war that
followed,
was one of the
toughest
and
bloody
wars
in African
history. This was due to the sheer
determination, tenacity and ingenuity
of
the
Biafran
army
which refused
to
give
up.
Biafra's
principle
disadvantage
was
its
lack
of arms.Most of the world s
major arms
suppliers
sided with the
Federal government.
Britain, the
So-
viet
Union, and
Islamic
nations
aided
Nigeria.
The
United
States remained
neutral.
France
sold
limited
numbers
of
weapons
to Biafra.
Portugal,
Rhode-
sia,
and South Africa gave
aid to
Biafra,
but
they
were all limited
because
of
arms
embargoes
against
all of
them for
their
policies
of defiance
in Africa.
As a
consequence,
Biafra
had
to
use
surreptitious
means to
obtain
weap-
onry
from
anywhere they could. What
they couldn t smuggle
in,
they made,
and
the
results
were
Impressive. But
the
latter
is the
subject for a
seperate
article.
Noticeably
lacking
from the
Biafran
arsenal were armored
vehicles.
Biafra
scoured Europe
for
sources of
weap
ons, and
found
them
in the
scrap yards
12
still
existing of
World
War
II
refuse.
France, the Biafrans purchased
p
haps
a
dozen decrepit examples
of
t
Universal
and Bren carrier
family.
Som
came
from
scrap yards,
and
perha
even
a
museum. The
vehicles
reach
Biafm through
Port Calabar. In
Biaf
the vehicles were put into running
co
dition
and
then
modified for
comb
The
original armor was
considered
t
thin,
so a
tall
box
armor superstru
ture was built
up
around the open
t
of
the carrier and
prOvided
with
g
slits
.
The
vehicles
were
armed
with .
caliber
machine
guns. The Biafra
called
them
The Red Devils.
The
Nigerian
Federal Army
h
been supplied
by France
and
Brita
The
Nigerian
armored
vehicles includ
Ferrets, Saladins, Saracens,
and Fren
A JV1L armored cars.
While
the Fren
ceased
prO\ision
ofeqUipment
to
Nig
ria shortly
after
the war
began, Brita
provided :\igeria with
numerous Salad
and
Saracen
armored cars,
and
the
became
the dominant
vehicles of t
war,
spearteading every
major
Ni
rian attack.
The
first armored
vehicles to s
action was
a
squadron of
Nigerian F
ret armored
cars
th at supported t
advance
on
i\ sukka. On
July 6, 19
the
advance
began. The Ferre
sucessfully ambushed some trucks
f
of Biafran
sol
diers.
However. as t
column advanced on Nsukka
a
Fer
gunner
panicked
and opened
fire
Nigerian
troops,
killing eleven.
The Biafrans
responded
with
counter-attack
of their own
in
the
M
west. SDme Red Devils
were
slated
use in
the battle.
However
they su
fered
mechanical breakdown
before
th
reached
the
battlefield
and
could not
repaired
in time.
The
Biafrans subsequently ma
an
attempt
to drive
on
Lagos. The
ope
ing
pl
ay
of
this
offenSive
was an atta
on the are region. Before
the batt
Biafran soldiers disguised
as
Yoru
tribesmen
carried
out
careful
reco
na i
ssa
nce
to
locate the
Nigerian po
tions.
However,
just
before
the Biafr
attack
a
Nigerian
force
under
Iluyomade moved forward
fifteen mi
to
Ofusu
and set up a
concealed
po
tion.
This
was
not detected by the
rec
elements.
The
advance
began on
A
gust
11.
1967.
Led by a
Red
Devil.
the Biafr
move
was taken by surprise. Althou
raw recruits, the Nigerians held th
fire
until the
Biafrans
were
close.
T
opening Nigerian
fire
drove ofT t
useum
Ordnan
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
13/30
.,
-
Map
from The Brothers War by John
de
st JOrTe Houghton Mifflin Company.
1972. An excellent
book
covering
much ofthefrghting and the political intrigue
sUrTounding this civil war.
bombers
and
the Red Devils.
the
Nige
rian garrison was
forced
into
a
small
pocket
on
the edge of the
sea. The
Biafran
attack
bogged down
around
Christmas
1967
because
of
a dispute
between
the two major Blafran com
manders. They went to Port Harcourt
to
resolve
theirdispute.
Meanwhile
the
Nigerians
took
advantage
of
the lull to
replace the commander
on
the island
and
bring
in
reinforcements. The new
Nigerian force
launched
a
counter
offensive.
By the time the Blafran
leaders returned. their troops were in
full
retreat and
by early 1968. the Is
land was completely back
In Nigerian
hands.
On March 25. 1968.
Colonel
Joe
"Hannibal" Achuzle
of the
Biafran forces
set his men up on
either side
of
the road
at Abagana down
which
the Federal
column was
travelling.
t
consisted
of
102 vehicles.
Including armored
ve
hicles.
and
was escorted
by 6.000
troops.
When
the column reached the
midpoint
between
either end of
his
forces he
ordered his
men
to open
fire.
A chance
mortar
bomb hit a fuel
truck
and exploded 8.000 gallons offuel
that
shot
a
400 meter tongue of
flame
back
down
the
column.
The
Federal troops
panIcked
and in their attempt
to es
cape.
ran right
into the
guns of
the
Blafran soldi ers. Very few sUIvived.
Meanwhile.
the
Biafrans
began
re-
Biafran infantry. However. a Biafran
mortar
fired a lucky
shot that
knocked
out
the
Nigerian
81mm mortar. The
Red Devil
continued to
advance. It
was
peppered by withering
small arms
fire
which
failed to penetrate the
added
on quarter inch armor
plate.
The
Red
Devil penetrated the position
and
be
gan
to chew
up the
Nigerian
troops
with its
machine guns.
At
this point
the Nigerians
had
nearly
exhausted
their ammunition. In desperation they
doused the
vehicle with
gasoline and
set
it
on
fire. This
stopped the
vehicle.
killed
the
crew.
and
effectively
stopped
the Biafran advance.
After
an
all
night
battle.
the
Biafrans withdrew. leaving
their
dead and the
burnt out
Red
Devil.
On September 10.
1967. the
Biafrans launched
a
bid
to
retake
Nsukka
.
Several
Red Devils led the
attack.
Nsukka
was defended
by
the
Nigerian 1st
Brigade
eqUipped
with
re
coilless rifles. Against
small arms
and
raw recults the
Red Devils
could pre
vail.
but neither condition existed at
Nsukka. Against
these
Nigerian troops
the vehicles proved to
be
slow. blind.
cumbersome. hard
to
maneuver. and
dangerous to accompanying troops be
cause of the amount of
fire they
at
tracted.
Three of
the Red Devils were
destroyed by
recoilless rifle fire
and
close-in Infantry
attack.
The Blafrans
were thrown back. leaving
their
three
destroyed
Red Devils behind.
Another
Biafran offensive
was
the
attempt
to
retake the island of
Bonny.
Thiswas an important
oll
terminal that
the Nigerians
had
taken early In the
war. Due
to
operations elsewhere. the
Nigerians
had reduced the
garrison to
a minimal force .
The
Biafrans
took
advantage of this
weakness and
launched an amphibious attack.
ferry
ing over a large force including four Red
Devils. The
attack on
Bonny
was sup
ported
by B-26
bombers.
Between
the
Armor
Modeling
and
Preservation Society ..
or AMPS, is a non-profit organization whose
purpose
is to "associate interest ed
individua ls and organizations in both sharing an interest in the history of
armored vehicles
and
in cultivating interest in armored vehicles
and
related
subjects via the hobby of modeling
"
I30resight the Society's publication, is issued six-times per
year and
is full of
articles, reviews, and other information useful to the military modeler.
A one-year membership is $20.00 (U.s.),
Canada
$25.00,AlI Others: $25.00 surface
and $35 airmail. All payments must be in U.s. funds, no credit cards.
AMPS
P.O.
Box 331
Darlington,
MD 21034
r
Plan
on
attending AMPS 96, the 2nd Annual National Conven
tion of the Armor Modeling
and
Preservation Society on April
19
20, 1996
at
the Aberdeen, Maryland, Sheraton
Four
Points.
January
1996
13
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
14/30
c
eh
in g ant i -tank
rock
ets [
rom
:> rance
and 37mm ~ E B rocket launchers from
Portugal. In June 1968, the French
anti-tank rockets were
fired
at Nigerian
ML
armored cars, which were
stllJ
operational despite
France's
embargo
of
spare
parts.
In August
1968,
the
Nigerians at
tacked Aba. The Biafrans blew the
Awaza
and
Imo
bridges but failed
to
blow
a pipeline.
over the river with
a
catwalk
over
the top. The Biafrans
covered
this pipeline
with automatic
weapon fire. However.
when they
ran
outofammunition.
the Nigerians
sent
three infantry
battalions
across and
established a bridgehead before
repair
ing the
main
bridge
to
bring across
their
artlllery
and
armored cars. The
Biafrans
received reinforcements. and
1,000
men under
the
command
of
a
South
African mercenary
Tafty Will
iams launched a counterattack on Au
gust
24.
to
throw the
Nigerians back.
Equipped with small
arms.
mortars.
and
a
Biafran-made
electrically
fired
claymore-type
mine known as the
ogbun ig we
This Blafran-made
mine
was
reported to
have a
200-meter
kill
ing range
in
a 90 degree
arc.
The
Biafrans took ground but were coun
terattacked
by
Federal forces
led
by
Saladin
armored
cars. The Biafrans
stopped vehicles with anti-tank ditches
and
fired
40 ogbunigwes on the first
day.
ASaladin's tires were shredded by
these
mines and
forced to withdraw.
However. the Biafrans
ran
low on am
munition and were forced to
halt.
They
resisted
frontal
Federal
attacks
for two
more days. mostly
by clever employ
ment
of
their mines.
Finally
the Nige
rians hooked around
to the
right and
broke
through
the
weak
Biafran
flanks
with
their armored cars. This force
took Aba.
In
the attempt
to
break out,
Colonel Achuzie. the hero of Abagana
had a near head on collision
with
a
Federal Saladin. However, In
the con
fusion
he escaped.
By
this
time.
the
Biafrans had no
armor oftheir own. but soon had a two
car armored battalion of captured
armored cars. The first armored car
was captured in
the
Onitsha
sector
after t was immobilized by a prOjectile
fired by Corporal Nwafor. When the
elated
Corporal ran
forward to examine
his prize. he was killed. Th e vehicle was
named after him.
The Corporal NwaJor
was soon joined by the OgutaBoy This
vehicle was
recovered
when the 14th
Blafran division
was aSSigned to
clear
Oguta. where the Nigerians had unex
peeledly landed
and
taken the town
.
This operation was successful
and
in
their withdrawal.
the Nigerians drove
an
armored
car
into
the river
to
prevent
Its
capture.
However.
the
vehicle
was
recovered by the Blafrans
who
named
it after
the town
where it was
captured.
The
Corporal NwaJor
and Oguta Boy
turned
the
tide
of
many encounters as
the Nigerians
did
not
expect the Biafrans
to
have armor.
and
since they were of
the same type
as
Nigerian vehicles.
often thought they were Nigerian ve
hicles that had
gotten
confused when
they
opened fire. The
hesitation
and
confusion
were often enough
to
turn
Ll Je tide of
battle.
Meanwhile, the Nigerian 1st Divi
sion was assigned to take Abakaliki.
They
were stopped
when
the
Biafrans
blew the
Ezello bridge.
Under the pro
tection
of supporting fire. the Nigerians
set up a bailey
bridge
and crossed the
river
spearheaded
by
their
armored
cars. This
force
took
Abakaliki.
In
April
1969
.
the
FederalIst
Divi
sion, led
by their
armored
cars,
made
a
drive
on Umuahla.
They
broke
through the Biafran
64th
Brigade and
then Into
the rear of the Biafran
55
Brigade around Uzuakoli.
The
Og
oy was dispatched to assist the Blaf
defense.
The
crew of OgutaBoywant
to
set
up
in
a
concealed position, so
vehicle could Withdraw if threaten
However, a colonel ordered
the
Og
Boy to
attack,
exposed
and
unsu
ported.
The
crew
explained
the
folly
this command,
but
the
colonel
insist
The Oguta Boy
carried out his
or
and
in
short
order was knocked o
and recaptured by the Nigerians. Ov
confident. the Nigerians
launched th
own
armored thrust against
Biaf
positions on April 6 at Aflkpo.
T
attack was stopped by
Biafran an
tank
guns
and
the Nigerians los
Ferret, Saracen. and a Saladin armo
car.
This was
only
a
temporary
setba
as eventually
the
Nigerians
to
Uzuakoll.
The
war ended in
January
19
Led
by
armored
cars
, Federal for
slowly
took town
after town after to
until
Blafra
ceased
to exist.
A form
cease fire was declared
on
January
and
the
Lagos
government
declared
end to hostilities on
January
15th.
Museum Ordnan
4
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
15/30
Just before they were to board a flight
from London. a group of
primarily
Brit
ish
and
Australian
veterans
were in
formed by the Libyan government
that
their visas
had
been withdrawn.
The
group.
planning
to visit
and pay
tribu te
to their fallen comrades in
and
around
Tobruk. seemed to be caught in
the
political battle between Libya
and most
other
countries over
the
investigation
into the bombing of Pan
m
103 over
Lockerbie.
Scotland.
t appears that
Libya reacted to
comments made by President Clinton
at
the unveiling of a monument to the
victims of that terrorist attack.
Kenya's
President
Daniel
arap
Moi
charged that
Uganda was
allowing
South African mercenaries to use their
country as a staging
ground
for an
attack
on Kenya. Kenya and Uganda
have traded
verbal assaults
since 1986
when the current
Kenyan
regime came
to power.
For its part. Uganda denied any
knowledge or involvement in such a
plot
and
chided Kenya for accusing it of
such. A leading Kenyan newspaper
stated that the
funding and planning
for the planned coup came from an
"unnamed"
Kenyan opposition party.
Further.
in
mid -November Uganda
claimed that
at least 200 Kenyan
troops
along with Ugandan rebels were
on
the
border ready to strike into
Uganda.
t
seems likely
that
fighting will
happen
along the border sometime.
even
ifboth
sides stumble
into it
acci
dently.
The French Army recently lost one
of
their Puma helicopters to ground fire.
Actually.
it was
a very angry. and re
portedly
very
drunk. French farmer
armed
with
a shotgun upset at
the
low
altitude of
the
helicopter over his prop
erty.
Would this
be
considered
friendly
fire??
I t
has been
recently
reported that Rus
sia
will
begin delivering
modem.
so
phisticated weaponry to South Korea
to
pay
down
the $1.56
billion
debt to
January 1996
the
Asian nation.
Reportedly T-80U main battle
tanks. BMP-3
infantrycombat
vehicles.
Metis-M anti-tankguided missiles.
and
Igla anti-aircraft missiles are included
in the
package.
If the
deal
goes
to
completion.
de
liveries will
span
through 1998.
The Friends ofthe Israeli
Defense
Forces
Is a worldwide organization that seeks
to provide social. recreational. andedu
cational services to active and retired
members of the IDF.
Along
with
their efforts to raise
funds for these causes. The Friends
also arrange and conduct tours of Is
rael. and because of
the
nature of the
organization,
these tours
Include a
number of destinations of
Interest
to
military and armor historians.
The
tours last eleven days (Includ
ing
travel
time).
Among the points of
interest
for
our
readers are Latrun
(me
morial
and museum site of
the
Ar
mored
Corps) . a tou r of the Golan
Heights. Citadel
of
DaVid Museum.
Masada, and at least one active Israel
military
base.
The 1996 tours are planned for
early February
($2.079).
late-July
($2.699). and mid-:.1o\'ember ($2,598).
For
more Information
contact the
Friends
of the
IDF, Mission
Depart
ment. 133
So.
Li
Ving
ston
Avenue;
Livingston, : 1J 07039 or call (201) 535
2671 (1-800-769-6000).
Christopher Foss has
reported in
a
Janes'
Defense Weekly (November II.
1995) article that
the
Russian T-90 Is
in
production
with more
than
100 al
ready
in service. The article includes
one three-quarters right front view of
the T-90.
More importantly is his informa
tion
on the new
Russian
tank under
development, possibly to be called the
T-95. This
tank
will probably have the
crew in
the forward
section
of the ar
mored
hull, with
an
externally-mounted
main gun (possibly either a 135mm
or
140mm).
I t
will most likely place a
greaterimportanceon survivability
than
previous Russian deSigns
and
will most
likely
be
diesel-powered.
Foss says
that
this new
tank
could
be introduced as
early
as 1997.
Another military tour that I
have
heard
a tremendous number of good things
about are the
Russian tours
sponsored
by
Robert
Fleming of Panzer Prints in
the
UK. I recently
met with
Bob
and
received a brief outline of his tour.
"The
third Panzer
Prints
'Tank
Tour" to Moscow
took
place in
Septem
berand
twelve
Individualsspentaweek
visiting Russian military
museums.
Sunday
was
a
sightseeing day with
visits
to the
Kremlin
and the
new Great
Patriotic
War Museum on the
Poklonnaja Hill. a five minute bus ride
from the hotel. The next two days were
spent
examining the
incredible AFV
collection at
the
Kubinka
Proving
Ground followed by a
visit
to the
Cen
tralArmed Forces
Museum
on Wednes
day."
"In additional to a
guided
tour of
the museum. the
group was invited to
explore
the
"fonts"
or
archives of each
department within
the
museum. They
saw and examined
objects
which
they
could only dream about. including
Hitler's
uniforms. Zhukov's
medals
and
the ultra
rare 2cm Luftfaust. a one
man
AA
weapon.
Thursday morning
saw the group at
the
Aerospace Mu
seum
at
Monino before returning to the
CAFE for
lunch and the
chance to
explore the fonts again. Current AFVs
such as the
T-80MU. BMP-3.
and
BTR
80 were examined at
the
Academy of
Armoured
Forces
on Friday.
The
final
daywas spent in military
book shops or
shopping before
the return
flight to
London."
Panzer Prints is planning at least
twotrips
in 1996.
thefirstinearlyMay
and the second in mid-September. Cost
from
the
U.S.
is
estimated at
about
$2.000 For
more
information. contact
Panzer
Prints.
The Falcon. Leverton
Road.
Sturton-Ie-Steeple. Retford
Notts. DN22 9HE.
England.
_ . . . . . . ~ t I t
We carry many, many - : : ; ; ~ ~
books on
m i l i t a r ~
tanks
t
"
,
-
t r ~ ~
~
combat \'ehicies .. with
many tit es
a\ '
ailable
o n l ~ t h r o u ~ h us
Plus a l a r ~ e s e l e c t i o n
or
technical manuals on
military trucks. jeeps and otherWW2 and post
war i l i t a r ~ \'I.'hicles.AII issues of
AFTER
THE
BATTLE
and WI EEL TRACK m a ~ a
l . i n e s
are
stocked. Send $3 t o d a ~ tllr
our
4 page catalog.
sent "'irst Class. ($5. overseas
by
air)
[f
PORTR Y L
PRESS
P.O. Box 1190-D
Andover.
NJ
07821
15
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
16/30
Special Forces/Special Operations Vehicle
HM WV
The
M998A2
is the improved
and
up -
graded
variant
of the now well known
Hurruner. The A2 includes a new 6.5
liter 160 hp diesel engine. a new
fourspeed automatic transmission.
larger
and improved brakes.
increased
payload.
and an
improved
human
fac-
tors package.
Using the basic platform.
M
Gen-
eral
has
built
and is
demonstrating
a
prototype for a Special Forces/Special
Operations variant
At least
on paper
the
SOY
variant
has
basically the same performance
specifications
as
the basic Hummer. In
appearance the obvious difference is
the large roll cage with
Integral
rotating
ring.
articulated side
arms
with
7. 62mm
machine guns.
and
smoke grenade
launchers.
To
date the company
has
not an-
nounced any orders from any country
for the vehicle.
nice
left
side
view
of
the SOV HMMWV
showing the
turret ring
with a 50
ca
machine gun. two 7.62 CPMC. one mounted on the left side by
the
rear door
the other
on the
rightfront comer
of the
dashboard.
the
smoke
grenade
tubes.
the central tire inflation
system.
LEFT: The underside
of
the heavy w
ons ring mount. A
number of weap
ranging from three barrel gat/ing g
30mm cannons
and
40mm gren
launchers
can
be mounted.
With the spare tire
swung
to the
and
the
tailgate dropped. you can
the
gunner s platform and farther
ward
the
radio
and
CPS locations.
remainder
of
the space is for extra f
ammunition. and
supplies
for
the
c
Museum Ordna
6
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
17/30
The
Common
Chassis
Revisited
The U.S. Army s
Advanced Field
Artillery System
Crusader
Lawrence D. Bacon and
Dr. Asher H. Sharoni
At a
recent armor conference at Ft.
Knox. I was amazed to
see
that the
principal topic of
discussion
was
the
Advanced
Field ArtillerySystem AFAS).
otherwise
known
as
the Crusader
Pro
gram. Like any good tanker. I have a
great appreciation
for
the value of ac
curate and
timely
fire
support.
how
ever. I was somewhat
bemused by
its
prominent
role in
this
annual
gather
ing
oftreadhead intelligentsia
Subse
quently. I
decided to explore
alterna
tives to
the
Crusader that
might truly
benefit
both the
Artillery
and Armor
communities.
The quest
for a modern self-pro
pelled
howitzer
has captured the
full
attention and
efforts of
both
the U.S.
Army
and industry. as
CRUSADER pro
gram is one
ofthe very
few
new
starts
in
combat vehicle development. Self
propelled howitzers are key players on
the modern battlefield.
and
once
equipped with
an
effective
and
autono
mous
Command
and Control system.
they are capable of expeditious
deploy
ment and rapid relocation of concen
trated
fire power. To
accomplish
the
fire support
mission under all weather
and combat
scenarios.
a modem self
propelled howitzer must possess
these
basic
characteristics:
Autonomous rapid
firing
reaction
High
operational availability
January
996
M284 CANNON
(MODI FIED M185)
REMOTELY
OPERATED
TRAVEL LOCK
AUTOMATIC FIRE
Optimum
crew ballistic
protection
Significant reduction
of manpower
workload intensity
The
current PALADIN M109A6 howit
zers are
deficient
in range.
lethality.
survivability
and
also lack
the mobility
to keep up with
the
rest
of the
maneu
ver
force.
These
limitations.
combined
with
a
heavy
crew workload. severely
impede
the
Paladin's ability to
engage
in
close support
maneuvers and
effec
tively
demonstrate its
full firepower
potential.
The
revised
post
-cold
war
u.s.
Army
mission
calls for a
new and
revolution
ary way
of
restructuring procurement
and acquisition philosophies
for
mod
ernization of armored
vehicles.
The
ever changing
global political
situation
is
straining
an
invariably decreasing
defense budget.
It is.
therefore
.
para
mount
that
the U.S.
consider new
ap
proaches
in developing.
implementing
and fielding an
advanced
field
artillery
system.
The Crusader Program was
devised
to fully
comply with
the
Army's
opera
tional reqUirements
while
serving
as
a
"Technology
Carrier
for future
combat
vehicles
.
Nonetheless.
due
to
persis
tent
technical challenges.
it is conceiv
able
that
Crusader
will
be
reassessed
and
ultimately
revised.
Without
edito
rializing. compelling
rationale includes:
An
adverse
political
environment
re
lected
by
congressional involvement
and concern
Significant
R&D
costs
High
technical
risk associated
with
the
Regenerative Uqutd
Propellant GWl
RLPG) technology
Controversial selection
of
a water-cooled
powerpack
(ignoring
the Army's
in
vestment in the Advanced Integrated
Propulsion
System AlPS)
technology)
Significant costs
of
procurement & ac
quisition
The
keystone
technology
of
the Cru
sader
Program.
and its overall
weapon
system approach.
is
the revolutionary
Regenerative Liquid Propellant
Gun
(RLPG).
Technical problems
(consis
tent performance. corrosion and
weight
growth) continue
to delay satisfactory
demonstration
of
this weapon.
and fur
thermore. the
U.S. is
undertaking the
RLPG
development on
its own. without
a standardization
agreement
with
NATO.
One
must consider that
a compa
rable and equally potent weapon sys
tem may be
devised
by utilizing avail
able systems and mature technologies
effectively
integrated
and
packaged
to
address
operational reqUirements. For
example. there
is
a
gun
presently
avail
able which demonstratesadequate
long
range performance
(30/40 km with
sufficient built-in
growth
potential.
This gun
is designated
as the 155 mm
L52
and was
developed
and
produced
in accordance with
the
oint
aUistics
Memorandum O Understanding
JBMOU)
endorsed by
France.
Germany.
Italy.
the United
Kingdom
and
the
United States.
Coupled
with the Modu-
larArtil lery
Charge System MACS).
the
17
M1
82 GUN MOUNT
(MODIFIED M178
MICROCLIMATE
COOLING SYSTEM
(MCS)
CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS)
SEGREGATED
HYDRAULIC
SECURE VOICE
COMPARTMENT
DRIVER'S NIGHT
AND DIGITAL
COMMUNICATIONS
VI SION DEVICE
The
M109A6
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
18/30
U.S. Army can achieve most
of the
CRUSADER f irepower
goals
while
maln
tainingweapon/ammunition common
ality
within
NATO.
THE
THINKING TANKER'S
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION
TO CRUSADER
In
the mid-1980·s. General
Bob
Sunnell's "think-tank" came
up
with a
concept called the
"Armored
Family
of
Vehicles" (AFV) . Although the
FV
offered
many interesting
life-cycle and
logistics savings. with its $30 billion
procurement price
tag. t
was
preor
dained to
go by
the wayside. Nonethe
less.
the concept of a common chassis
for
frontline
armored fighting vehicles
has
great
merit. and in
todays
environ
ment. where
we
are struggling
to
main
tain some
semblance
of a
tank indus
trial base. we may have a perfect
oppor
tunity
to achieve multiple
kills
with
one
sabot.
M l
COMMON CHASSIS
As
a cost-effective and affordable alter
native
to the
Crusader.
the authors
propose a "system of systems" com
prised of an Advanced Field Artillery
System
and a
companion Future
Ar
mored Resupply Vehicle. both
com
monly based on the readily
available.
battle
proven and reliable Ml chaSSiS.
built
by
General Dynamics Land
Sys
tems.
AFAS/Ml
would
be a
self-propelled
howitzer
equipped
with the 155
mm
L52 conventional
gun
coupled with
an
automatic Ammunition Handling
Sys
tem to provide the required lethality.
survivability and
range with
a much
less manpower intensive gun.
FARV/M . AFAS/Ml's companion
resupply
vehicle. would provide
ample
storage
space under
armor. enhanced
carrying
capacity. excellent
agility and
survivability. and eqUivalent mobility
to its counterpart. This
system combi
nation would have significantly in
creased capabilities over the current
M 1
09-serles
fleet.
Further.
any
reqUirement
poten
tially
provided
by the Crusader. would
be
proVided
with higher confidence
and
less technical risk by the AFAS/FARV
M 1 weapon system at a relatively cost
effective
and
affordable price.
Though
RLP technology may possess an in
herent potential for greater range. rate
of
fire and lethality. t Is not readily
available for near future
implementa
tion.
Declining
budgets. design lmma
turity and enormous technical chal
lenges place
the
RLP
outside the
win
dow
of opportunity
for
the
Crusader.
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES
OVERVIEW
AFAS/FARV/Ml's performance char
acteristics combined . provide
an af
fordable.
cost-effective. low technical
risk and
extremely potent
weapon
sys
tem
which constitutes a
significant
quantum leap in force effectiveness:
• 155mm L52
Joint Ballistics
Memo
randum Of Understanding cannon.
52 calibers long. currently installed
in
the German
howitzer PzH2000.
Effective range of 30km (unas
Sisted) /40km
(assisted)with growth
potential. Upgraded with an inte
grated laser
ignition
system. En
hanced gun
tube wear
life due
to
a
chromium plated barrel process.
• "MACS"
(Modular
Artillery Charge
System).
X1Il231/X1Il232. Bar
Coded.
to facilitate automation of
propellant
loading.
handling
and
storage. MACS provides incr,eased
tactical llexibility.
improves
gun
per
formance and is more cost-effective
than standard
conventional bag
charges. It promotes faster action
through improved
logistics:
is safer
(more insensitive):
autoloader
com
patible:
non-toxic: lighter: cheaper;
environmentally
safe; requires lower
operational and training costs: oc
cupies
less volume and
demands
less transportation. MACS
does not
leave residue
in
the gun breech
which
can slowdown the rate
of fire. MACS
is a low-risk. low-cost, viable solid
propellant backup and substi
to RLP technology.
.Full operational and
automati
plenishment capability under
clear
Biological Chemical ba
field envirorunentsand sustairu
through
state-of-the-art
resupp
• Autoloader to
provide
an
incre
rate
offire
(Burst rate: 3 rounds
seconds:
Sustained
rate:
9
rou
minute.
thereafter). automatio
ammunition
loading.
handling
storing
and
consequential
re
tion
of manpower
workload in
sity.
•
Autonomous
Command
Con
and Battle Management System
rapid
firing reaction.
independ
tactical mission execution (se
cation. self-computation
of
tec
cal
fire
control.
planning. embe
decision aid capability and fire
port
digital communications).
get acquisition and
prioritiza
effective firepower
on targets
accurate damage assessments
•
Ml modified
chassis for
impr
mobility. agility and
maneuver
ity to keep up
with the
mane
forces and
provide
optimum ba
tic protection with ingrained 20
25%
weight and combat-load gr
potential.
•
An
extensive and highly-effe
"Survivability Suite" comprise
the
following
sensors
and
sub
tems:
environmental control an
support;
supplemental
bal
protection:
detection
avoidance
terials (stealth); early warning:
tection against directed energy
electro-magnetic pulse; counterm
sures; fire
detection. preventio
suppression; and
highly
poten
fensive armament. eqUipment
secondary weapons.
• Future Maintenance
and
Trai
Concepts (e.g.
Modularity. Tes
Test. Embedded Training
and D
nostics &
Prognostics).
AFAS/Ml
would
fire 4
to
8 rou
in
a Simultaneous Impact Mission
between
6-40
km. All rounds
wt
pact
within
4
seconds (first-to
round). This requirement can be
tained with an effective combinati
a Management
BattleSystem.
Fire
trol
System.
Global
Positioning Sy
18
Museum Ordna
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
19/30
- - - M COMMON CHASSIS
55mm L52 HOWITZER
CONCEPT
PRINCIPLE FEATURES
-Improved overall survivability
4
man
crew
-Improved ballistic armor
UNMANNED
-Segregated/consolidated
crew compartment
WEAPON STATION
-Compartmentalized fuel &
ammunition
-Ammunition handling system
Autoloader)
-High mobility
&
agility
-NBC
protection
& Environmental regenerative
life
-Advanced hydropneumatic suspension
-Cruising
range of 275
miles minimum)
-Gross weight
of
55 tons maximum)
M1 BASED
MODIFIED CHASSIS
CPS) and an autoloader_ AFAS/M1 is
required to perform survivability (250
to 750m) or tactical 4 km) moves after
every
mission
to avoid enemy
counter
battery fire. To perform a fire mission.
crew
members
will
ot
be required
to
leave their
protected
and
consolidated
compartment.
All
operational
activi
ties will be remotely executed to in
clude: target identification
and
acqUi
sition. ballistic
computations. gun
po
sitioning and
aiming
.
ammunition
loading. and of
course.
firing.
Once the
firing mission
has
been concluded.
AFAS/M1 will move quickly to a new
poSition to
enhance
Its survivability
and
provide effective tactical flexibility.
January
1996
AFAS/M1 will carry up to 80
fused
(Multi-Option
Fuse
for Artillery-MOFA)
and pre-coded rounds with correspond
Ing
68 XM231 and
178
XM232 stored
In 41 magazine storage spaces @ 6
MACS/space) for
automated handling
and loading. They are stored In two
ready and accessible magazines located
in the hull below the weapon station s
bearing ring. FARV/Ml will carry up to
180 3
full
complements of 60 rounds
each) fused and pre-coded rounds with
corresponding 153
XM231 and
399
XM232
in 92 storage spaces. They
are
stored
In the primary transfer
maga
zine. below the crew deck level. and in
the secondary magazineabove the crew
level. Compartmentalized ammuni
tion
storage and
blow-off' panels will
be
provided In both
vehicles
to further
enhance
survivability.
AMMUNITION HANDLING
SYSTEM
The
autoloader will
be
compliant with
the
operational requirements to pro
vide the rate
of
fire
and
ammunition
handling safely and reliably.
t
will
have the capability ofdet ermining am
munition type. lot.
fuse
and
weight.
During
resupply.
the
autoloader will
verity the projectile/fuze combination.
Throughout
a
firing
mission. the
19
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
20/30
M COMMON CH SSIS
FUTURE RMORED RESUPPLY
VEHICLE OVERVIEW
PRINCIPLE FEATURES
-Improved
overall
surv i
vabili
ty
·3 man crew
-Improved ballistic
arm
or
.Seg
regat
ed/conso l
idated
crew compartment
-C ompartmenlalrzed fuel ammunition
-
Ammunition
hand l
ing system Fully automated)
·High mo b ility ag ility
·NBC prolecl ion En vir on menta l reg en era l ive life
supp
·Advanced hydr
op neum ati c suspension
-Cruising range of 275 mi les (min im um)
-G
ros
s
we
ight
of S5 tons
(maxi IT m)
autoloader will independently
verity
the
projectile/fuze
combination prior
to
ramming.
There are a
myriad
of other
benefiCial features that an
autoloader
can
provide
that
are not delineated
here. and all
reqUirements
are attain
able with proven technologies. The
autoloader.
though
designed
to fit a
particular vehicle. contains generic
characteristics that could be tailored
to
meet
virtually
any vehicle configura
tion. t
will be capable of completely
and
automatically
accepting
ammuni
tion
from
the
FARV/Ml at a rate of 12
complete
155 mm rounds
per
minute.
The autoloader will also be capable of
downloading 155 mm ammun itlon and
propellant (MACS) to FARV/M 1
within
20
minutes or
to the ground
within
30
minutes.
Backup
capabilities will be
prOvided for manual upload
and
grace
ful
degradation. The autoloader
will
encompass
redundant
actuators
to
in
crease reliability and functionality.
CONSOLIDATED CREW
COMPARTMENT
AFAS/Ml will incorporate a
consoli
20
dated. four-man superstructure crew
compartment. Chief of Section and
drivers (redundant
controls) will be
provided
with 360
day/nightvisibility.
Close-in vision
will
be within
ten
feet
of
the vehicle due to the higher position of
the
crew
compartment located
at
the
front of the hull. It will also allow each
crewman to
directly
view
the
remaining
crewmen. There will be interior access
and visibility
between the
crew and
the
Weapon
Station
.
The crew
will
be en
tirely
segregated and compartmental
ized from the ammunition
and
the
weapon station
to increase sUrvivabil
ity.
The
Crew compartment will be ad
equately
protected
against
top
and di
rect attack.
high-explosive fragment
a
tion. small arms
and
mines. Crew
members will
be
provided
with pr
ovi
sions
for rest. environmental control
(including N C protection), integral
ration microwave
heater.
hygiene fac i -
ity and water stocks. all built-in and
completely
integrated
Into
the
ir con
solidated compartment. Crew mem
bers will not be
required
to leave their
compartment
to perform
any
ope
ration
unless under
an emergency /malfunc
tion
situation. The turretless. con
dated crew compartment simplifie
stallation
and ope
ratIon
of env
mental conu-ol.
Nb
C and ballistic
tection.
PERFOR.c\1A.i.'ICE ATTRIBUTED
TO
THE
M 1 CHASSIS
AFAS / :'H
must
successfully
kee
'Y,ith
th
e
su pported maneuver
f
The: f 1 mcxlilled chassis
(presently
ered
th a
1500
hp gas
turbine)
w
grant the
same level of mobility
ag
l ty
as the M 1
tank
fleet. Self
pelled
artillery capable of
opera
closer to main battle tanks will pro
unprecedented
level
of
immediate
pon. AFAS/Ml. as
a minimum. w
have
a
highway
speed of 65
kph.
a
sustained
cross-country speed o
kph.
This
is readily achievable wit
tanks
weighing approximately
70
t
f
AFAS/FARV
/Ml combat-loa
weight does not exceed 55 tons.
mobility and
agility will
surmount
of an M1 tank. Ml tanks will prob
remain in
active
service
until 2
2025
before
a
new
armored plat
useum Ordna
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
21/30
M COMMON CHASSIS
155mm L52 HOWITZER CONCEPT
ENGINE
COMPARTMENT
(VERTICAL REMOVAIJINSTL)
~ 322 IN .
8179mm)
-----------t _---
178
in.
4521mm)
- - - - - - .
1
OVERHANG
REMOTELY OPERATED
BARREL CLAMP
MARCH FUEL TANKS
(AS REQUIRED)
DRIVE SPROCKETS
TENS ONER
COMPUTER CONTROLLED
MULTI·PURPOSE
FRONT RESUPPLY PORT
ANTI-AIR
UNMANNED MAIN GUN WEAPON STATION
MISSILES
ELEV +75
·,
..J· AZIMUTH 3 · (HULL WIDTH
CONSrnA
I
Nn
ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
STORAGE
GROWTH
AREAS
CREW DECK LEVEL
CREW
STATION
(PLAN VIEW)
PAYLOAD
SPECIALIST
68 251N
1734mm ) ; ~ ~ ; ~ ~
= ¥ $ r = g ~
DRIVER S DECK LEVEL
51.75 I
N
1
467mm
l[
EOUIPMENT
BAY
FWD REAR MA GAZINE
INSTA LLATION AND
REMOVAL TffRU FRONT
January
996
FWD PRIMARY ACCESS
MAGAZINE
47
SPCS)
: g ~ ~ ~ \ ~ E S
- - -
-----------
LOAD PORT
L:::::
- - - -
H ~
~ ~
~ r
~
~ ~ _._-
PROJECTILEIMACS
TRANSFER UNIT ACCESS REAR SECONDARY
__
_
__
• _ _ PORTS 2) _ _ ___ . _
M 8 ~ G S A p Z
N ) E
BOTH SIDES
DOUBLE HATCH ACCESS
TO
WEAPON STATION
INSTRUMENT
PANEL
.<
SPROCKETS
OPTIONAL
SIDE ARMOR
WASTE
ELIMINATION
SYSTEM
VARIABLE HEIGHT
HYDRO·PNEUMATIC SUSPENSION
(UPGRADE)
PROJECTILEIMACS
SWING RAMMER
21
-
8/18/2019 Museum Ordnance Jan 96
22/30
M1 COMMON CHASSIS
FUTURE RMORED RESUPPLY VEHICLE
OVERHEAD M 1 E
NG
INE COMPARn E NT
ANTI-AIR MA INTENANCE WITH E
CS
f IR
SU
PP
RE
SS
OR
FARV REPLENISHMENT
l i - I 1 '11 HAT CH WI TH
ARMORED WINDOWS
{
ti
L ( -
I
.:.'"
c::=:=J c==:J
J
l I
.t
C
-
1
Cj[ J (? J-
- - -
- OPTIONAL
I
SIDE ARMOR
, : PROTECTION
--
o
L ~ _1 I
- r = = = : r = = =
= : : n : :
= =
: : : C
~
1_.
322 IN. (81
79
mm) 1 ~
l V AND LIGHT (2)
REAR VIEW
- -
..-.-.
--- -__ -- __._
._
._____1_
REPLENISHMENT
BOOM DOOR S
LEFT SIDE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
- - .. . - - - - - - - INTERMAGAZINE _
PRIMARY
[
ELEVATOR
245 SPACES - SHELLS & MACS ' . . . - .
''' '=' .
, ' '''
' ''''§ i
:
T
/ 1
I
L ~
:
~
~ ~ ~
8 ; 7 ~ ~ _
-
< ~
REPLENISHMENT BOOM -
-- -
NTEGRAL WIT