muraya agile workplace design
DESCRIPTION
Muraya's presentation from the annual Asia OfficeSpace Congress in Beijing on 7 June, 2013. In Beijing record high rents and low availability is driving an examination as to how the workplace has evolved and what can still change to encourage efficiency, productivity and smart spending in China's Modern Workplace. Find out more at www.muraya.com. Follow us on Social Media: http://www.linkedin.com/company/muraya https://www.facebook.com/MurayaDCE http://e.weibo.com/muraya?ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.muraya.com%2FTRANSCRIPT
AGILE WORKSPACE:THE DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN OFFICE
ARCHITECTURE
GOVERNMENT APPROVAL
CONSTRUCTION
AFTER SALES
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
INTERIOR DESIGN
ENGINEERING
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
THE MURAYA CIRCLE
CLIENTS
7,000 KIMBERLY CLARK Design & Construction LEED GOLD
40,000 BOEING Construction LEED GOLD
15,000 AKZO NOBEL Construction LEED GOLD
5,200 H&M RETAIL Construction
8,500 H&M Design & Construction
10,000 ABBOTT Design & Construction
5,300 VOLVO Design & Construction
5,000 MAQUET/GETINGE GROUP Design & Construction
5,000 ATLAS COPCO Design & Construction
4,000 REGUS Design & Construction
5,000 SANDVIK Design & Construction
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
m2
AGILE WORKSPACE:THE DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN OFFICE
1990’s 2000’s
1980’s
TODAY
ME. ME. ME.
GENERATION “Y”
GENERATION “Y” IN CHINA
• EMBRACING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
• SOCIAL HARMONY TO INDIVIDUALITY
• PERSONAL GROWTH > JOB SECURITY
• TEAMWORK INTO COLLABORATION
• HIGHER EXPECTATIONS
GENERATIONAL SHIFTS:
THE CHANGING WORKPLACE
INCREASED DENSITY: LESS SPACE PER PERSON
2010 ≈ 20 M²/PERSON
2016 ≈ 16 M²/PERSON
HIGHER UTILIZATION: MORE PEOPLE/DESK
2010 - 1.1 PEOPLE : 1 DESK
2017 - 1.6 PEOPLE : 1 DESK
THE CHANGING WORKPLACE
SPACELESS GROWTH
IMPLICATIONS OF SPACELESS GROWTH
ARE THE SPATIAL CHANGES OF THE “AGILE” WORKPLACE CONTRIBUTING POSITIVELY TO PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY?
ARE THERE DRAWBACKS TO THIS NEW ENVIRONMENT?
DO THE BENEFITS OF THE INCREASE IN SOCIAL SPACES OUTWEIGH THE LOSS OF PERSONAL SPACE?
DOES THE LOSS OF PERSONAL SPACE WITHIN THE OFFICE IMPACT EMPLOYEE LOYALTY?
ARE THESE SPATIAL CHANGES IN THE WORKPLACE TRULY REFLECTING THE ATTITUDES AND DESIRES OF THE GEN. Y’S?
THE PORTION OF “FOCUSED” WORK IS INCREASING AT THE SAME TIME THAT OPEN OFFICE PLANNING AND DISTRACTIONS ARE INCREASING
THE CHANGING WORKPLACE
NEW WORK MODES ARE DEFINING THE WORKPLACE:
LEARN
FOCUS
SOCIALIZE
COLLABORATE
AGILE WORKING
• WORK: AN ACTIVITY, NOT A PLACE
• PERFORMANCE OVER ATTENDANCE
• RELATIONSHIPS, NOT HIERARCHIES
• INNOVATION OVER BUREAUCRACY
• PEOPLE OVER PROPERTY
Gather a Toolkit to Build Your Agile Strategy
PEOPLE
WORKPLACE STRATEGY FACTORS
ORGANIZATION
SYSTEMS
PLACE
A HOLISTIC APPROACH
CORPORATE IDEALS (DIRECTION AND OBJECTIVES)MANAGEMENT CULTURE (INCLUSION, TRUST)
OPERATIONAL CULTURE (GETTING THINGS DONE)RELATIONSHIP WITH MANAGERS
ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES (PERSONAL CONTROL)PERSONAL (EXPERIENCE, TRAINING, MOTIVATION)
REWARD (SALARY AND WORK CONTRACT)WORK/LIFE (FLEXIBILITY, AUTONOMY)
EXTERNAL (HOME LIFE, WELL BEING, COST OF LIVING)
RESOURCING (PEOPLE, WORKLOAD)TEAM STRUCTURE/DYNAMICS (FORMAL/INFORMAL)
SYSTEMS AND INTERNAL PROCESSES
SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUAL/GROUP WORKING
WORKSTATION (ERGONOMICS)SPACE (LAYOUT, SOCIAL SPACE)
SERVICES (FACILITIES, CLEANING, SECURITY)ENVIRONMENT (TEMPERATURE, LIGHT, NOISE)
HIERARCHY
INTE
RA
CTI
ON
DIFFERENTIATION
SUB
DIV
ISIO
NLOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIG
H
HIGH
HIG
HLO
W
SPATIAL STRATEGIES
UNDERSTAND YOUR COMPANY’S STRUCTURE
http://www.oma.eu/projects/2011/mckinsey-amp-company-offi ce-architects/
SPATIAL STRATEGIES
DETERMINE ADJACENCIES
CORPORATE AFFAIRS
COMMUNICATIONS
LEGAL AS APAC
HR
MD
TD
PD
PCR LAB
ACADEMY
TRAINING CENTER
CCC
PS
MRA
FOS
MAIN RECEPTION
GMO
SPATIAL STRATEGIES
APPLY ADJACENCY UNDERSTANDING
RECEPTION
PANTRY
MEETING CENTERS
RECEPTION AND SHOWROOM
GMO, LEGAL, CA, COMMUNICATIONS
HUMAN RESOURCES
DIABETES CENTER
APPLIED SCIENCE REGIONAL
PCR LAB
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
APPLIED SCIENCE ASIA PACIFIC
TISSUE DIAGNOSTICS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CUSTOMER CARE CENTER
TRAINING CENTER
ROCHE TRAINING ACADEMY
PROFESSIONAL DIAGNOSTICS
FINANCE AND OPERATION SERVICES
MEDICAL REGULATORY AFFAIRS
10
9
8
7
6
5
UTILIZE FEEDBACK
WORKPLACESTRATEGY
SPACEPLANNING
IMPLEMENTATION
FEEDBACK
BE AMENABLE TO CHANGE!
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
RE
LATI
VE P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E %
RELATIVE TEMPERATURE (T - TC)
RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICE WORK PERFORMANCE VERSUS DEVIATION FROM OPTIMAL COMFORT TEMPERATURE T
C
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
• # OF OCCUPANTS
• M2/OCCUPANT
• EXPANSION NEEDS
• CAPACITY
• ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
• GROWTH AND FLEXIBILITY
• WORK/LIFE BALANCE
• COLLABORATION
• WORKSPACE SHARING
• MOBILITY
TRADITIONAL FOCUS: AGILE WORKSPACE:
DESIGN SOLUTIONS
• VARIETY OF SETTINGS
• TEAM SPACE
• AGILE WORKSTATIONS
• “RETREATS”
• FLEXIBLE MEETING ROOMS
• COMMUNAL SPACE
• AMENITIES
• EFFICIENT ADJACENCIES
• APPROPRIATE SPACE ALLOCATION
INFORMAL, PUBLIC, AND MULTI-USE SPACE
• MEETING AREAS
• CORRIDORS
• PANTRIES
• LOUNGES AND RECREATION
HOW DO WE DEFINE PRODUCTIVITY?
• # OF HOURS WORKED
• SICK LEAVE
• PROCESS EFFICIENCY
TRADITIONAL FOCUS: NEW INDICATORS:
• EMPLOYEE RESPONSE TIME
• WORK PERFORMANCE
• EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
• RETENTION RATE
5 Key Tips
#1 - Hygiene Factors
AIR QUALITY
TEMPERATURE CONTROL
DAYLIGHTING
COMFORTABILITY
#2 - Individual Control
HYGIENE FACTORS
SPATIAL FLEXIBILITY
WORK/LIFE BALANCE
MOBILITY
MORE CONTROL = EMPLOYEE HAPPINESS
#3 - Spatial Considerations
OPEN VS CLOSED
PUBLIC/PRIVATE
FIXED/FLEXIBLE
COLLABORATIVE VS CONCENTRATIVE
INDIVIDUAL/GROUP DYNAMICS
ADJACENCY/PROXIMITY
#4 - Feedback
EMPLOYEE SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS
ANALYZE COMPANY STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES
EXAMINE CIRCULATION AND SPATIAL USE
THE WORKPLACE IS AN ONGOING PROCESS
#5 - Cultural Implications
GENERATIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS
FENG-SHUI
BRANDING
TRANSPARENCY
YOUR BUSINESS IN THE CHINESE MARKETPLACE
REFERENCES
Amaravadi, Chandra S.; Sheng, Olivia R. Liu;, George, Joey F., and Nunamaker, Jay F. “AEI: A Knowledge-Based Approach to Integrated Offi ce Systems.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Summer 1992): 133-163. JSTOR. Web. 8 Dec. 2012: <http://www.jstore.org/stable/40398022>.
Cain, Susan. “The Rise of the New Groupthink.” The New York Times, Opinion Page. January 13, 2012. Web. April 2013: <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-the-new-groupthink.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&#commentsContainer>.
DEGW Report, “The Impact of Change”. March 2013: <http://www.haworthmarketing.com/allways/download/AllWays-Design-Research-DEGW.pdf>.
Gensler. “Focus in the Workplace.” October 10, 2012. Web. March 2013: <http://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/Focus_in_the_Workplace_10_01_2012.pdf>.
Harris, Rob. Ramidus Consulting Limited, October 18th 2012. “Refl ections on the Modern Offi ce.” Web. March 2013: <http://www.ramidus.co.uk/ramidus-knowledge-centre.php>.
Lee, So Young and Brand, Jay L. Haworth. “Effects of Control over Offi ce Workspace on Perceptions of the Work Environment and Work Outcomes.” Web. May 2013.
Steelcase. “Leveraging Complexity.” 360 Magazine. Issue 61, February 2011. Web. March 2013: <http://360.steelcase.com/issues/leveraging-complexity/>.
Surowiecki, James. “Face Time.” The New Yorker, Financial Page. March 18th, 2013. Web. April 2013: <http://www.newyorker.com/talk/fi nancial/2013/03/18/130318ta_talk_surowiecki>.
Threesixty White Paper. November 2010. “New-Gen Workers in India & China: Reshaping their Workplaces & the World.” Gen Y in the Workplace. Steelcase Workplace Futures. Web. April 2013: <http://360.steelcase.com/white-papers/>.
Voss, Judy. “Revisiting Offi ce Space Standards.” Haworth. Web. May 2013: <http://www.haworth.com/home/resources/research/white-papers>.