multiphysics2009, 9-11 dec., 2009 kumamoto industrial research institute behavior of bubble pulse in...
TRANSCRIPT
Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Behavior of bubble pulsein food processing
using underwater shock wave
Hideki Hamashima*, Manabu Shibuta**, Yosuke Nishimura**, Shigeru Itoh**
*Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute**Shock Wave and Condensed Matter Research Center, Kumamoto University
2Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Content
Background and Purpose
Experiment
Numerical simulation
Conclusion
3Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Background (1/2)
Explosive processing
Explosive forming, Explosive welding, Explosive synthesis,Explosive cutting(Shaped charge) etc.
Recent years…Recent years…
Shock processing of Apple
Apple subjected to shock load
Conventional Techniques for Explosive and Shock wave …
(Except for Destruction technique!)
Food processing
Explosive and Shock wave are used for
If the apple with the load of the shock wave is extracted by hand, fruit juice will overflow. Fruit juice can be very directly drunk for a straw to an apple.
4Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Background (2/2)
Apple subjected to shock load
Food processing using shock wave
New Food Processing!New Food Processing!
Shock wave is generated from the explosion of explosiveand pulse power of a high voltage.
Attract attention!Attract attention!
Excellent Features!Excellent Features!• Processing time is very short.• There is little influence of heat to food.• Deterioration of food does not take place easily. • Bactericidal effect etc.
However…However…The details of shock processing are not clarifiednot clarified.
The shock wave which processes food has
•Shock wave generated by early explosion
•Shock wave generated by expansion contraction of detonation product gas(Bubble pulse).
5Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Purpose
Development of Food processing device using shock waveFinal Goal!Final Goal!
Therefore…Therefore…
In this research,
•Shock wave generated by early explosion
•Shock wave generated by expansion contraction of detonation product gas(Bubble pulse). InvestigationInvestigation
!!fundamental investigation
・ Optical observation using a high-speed video camera
・ Numerical simulation
Research method
In order to investigate the behavior of Bubble pulse,
6Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Bubble Pulse
• There are shock wave and explosion product gas in the fundamental phenomenon of underwater explosion. A gas bubble shows the complicated action which repeats expansion and contraction. The pressure called a Bubble pulse occurs at the time of contraction (when becoming the minimum radius).
• Although the maximum pressure of a bubble pulse is small compared with a shock wave, there is the feature that duration of shock is long. It is considered that it is important when calculating the shock response of marine structures, such as a ship.
7Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
ExperimentExperiment
8Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Experimental Setup
Water ContainerWidth : 1.2mLength : 3.2mDepth : 1.8m
High-speedVideo Camera
ExplosiveBubble
Pressure Gauge
WaterWater is poured fromthe bottom to 1.6m.
Observation Window
1.2m
3.2m
1.8m
9Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Experimental Water Container
Water ContainerWidth : 1.2mLength : 3.2mDepth : 1.8m
Water is poured from the bottom to 1.6m.
High-speed Video Camera
Phantom V7.3Vision Research, Inc.Resolution : 800x600 pix Rates : 2000fps
10Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Experimental Condition
Explosive Depth of Water (mm)
ED 200
ED 300
ED 400ED : No.6 Electrical Detonator
High-speedVideo Camera
Depth
Explosive
Water
Observation Window
1.6m
11Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Experimental ResultsExperimental Results
12Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Movie (ED, Water Depth:200mm,300mm)
200mm 300mm
These are movies at 200mm and 300mm in depth of the explosive.Detonation product gas repeated the expansion contraction like this.In the both experiments, the bubble at the first cycle expanded and contracted spherically. However, the bubble at the 2nd and 3rd cycle didn’t become spherical.
13Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Movie (ED, Water Depth:400mm)
400mm
This is a movie at 400mm in depth of the explosive.Detonation product gas similarly repeated the expansion contraction as for this.
14Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Bubble Diameter (Experiment)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
ED(200mm:EXP)ED(300mm:EXP)ED(400mm:EXP)
This is a time change of the bubble diameter obtained from the movies ahead.All experiments had the same diameters of the bubble for the first cycle.The bubble diameter became small by attenuation as the cycle progressed. And it became small at the 2nd cycle as depth of explosive became deep.
15Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (Experiment)
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
ED(200mm:EXP)ED(300mm:EXP)ED(400mm:EXP)
This is figure where the amount of the fall displacement of the bubble was shown. The amount of the fall displacement of the bubble has decreased as the position of explosion becomes deep.
16Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (ED:200mm:Experiment)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Time (ms)
Bub
ble
Dia
met
er (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bub
ble
Dis
plac
emen
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
Fall of BubbleThis is figure where the bubble diameter and the amount of fall of the bubble were shown. This is a result at 200mm. The bubble fell intensely when the bubble contracted.
17Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (ED:Experiment)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Time (ms)
Bub
ble
Dia
met
er (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bub
ble
Dis
plac
emen
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Time (ms)
Bub
ble
Dia
met
er (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bub
ble
Dis
plac
emen
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Time (ms)
Bub
ble
Dia
met
er (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300Bub
ble
Dis
plac
emen
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
ED:200mm ED:300mm
ED:400mm
Fall of Bubble
The bubble fell intensely when the bubble contracted at all the experiments.
18Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Consideration of Fall of Bubble
(a)Expansion (b)Contraction
(a) In a expansion process, the gas bag near a rigid body wall expands to the position of a dotted line.
(b) In a contraction process, water does not return from the circumference uniformly. Water follows the streamline at which it turned from the wall side, and the side which does not have a wall is easier to return.
19Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Consideration of Fall of Bubble
It is considered that a big flow of water is generated because it is easy to move in water on explosive below, and the bubble fell in these experiments.
Water
Air
Gas
Contraction
Fall of bubbleFall of bubble!!
20Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Pressure History (ED:300mm)
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m) Diameter
Displacement
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time(ms)
Pre
ssu
re(M
Pa) Pressure Measurement
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
This is a pressure measurement result obtained from a past experiment.After the bubble contracted, the shock wave has been generated.
21Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Pressure History (ED:300mm)
23.5ms0.5ms
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time(ms)
Pre
ssu
re(M
Pa) Pressure Measurement
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
42.0ms 11.5ms0.0ms
When a shock wave reache dan observation window Usual framing photographs
In an optical observation, it was understood that the shock wave reached the window from whitening of the window.
22Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
SimulationSimulation
23Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Simulation Model
Simulation was performed using LS-DYNA (SMP Edition ;smp971 ) .
Quarter model Simplification!
100mm
900mm
500mm500mm
400mm
Air
Water
Explosive1000mm
500mm
400mm
Air
Explosive
Water
Z
X
24Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Calculation Method
Calculation method
Burn technique
Euler method: Explosive, Air, Water
CJ volume burn + Programmed burn
(point ignition)
Mesh size
Euler element : 10 x 10 x 10 (mm)
Number of elements
Euler element : 250,000
25Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Equation of States (EOS)
Calculation method
Euler method: Explosive, Air, Water
Explosive
Detonation Products EOS: JWL EOS0.6g SEP was used instead of ED.
Air
Density: 1.252kg/m3
EOS: Ideal gas EOS
Water
Density: 1000kg/m3
EOS: Gruneisen EOS
26Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Calculation ResultsCalculation Results
27Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Movie (ED, Water Depth:200mm)
This is a numerical result when the position of the explosive is 200mm in depth.Although the bubble of the first cycle spread spherically, the bubble of the 2nd and 3rd cycle burst.
28Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Movie (ED, Water Depth:300mm)
This is a numerical result in case the position of the explosive is 300mm in depth.Only the bubble of the first cycle carried out expansion contraction spherically like the case of 200mm.
29Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Movie (ED, Water Depth:400mm)
This is a numerical result in 400mm. It differed in 200mm and 300mm, and the bubble of the 2nd and 3rd cycle was able to be expressed.
30Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Bubble Diameter (Calculation)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
ED(200mm:CAL)ED(300mm:CAL)ED(400mm:CAL)
This is a time history of the bubble diameter obtained from the numerical result. In the three condition, the outside diameter of the bubble at the first cycle became the same size as about 280mm.
31Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (Calculation)
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
ED(200mm:CAL)ED(300mm:CAL)ED(400mm:CAL)
This figure is shown about the fall of the bubble.An intense fall was not obtained too much like this.
32Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (ED:200mm:Calculation)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
This is figure where the bubble diameter and the amount of fall of the bubble obtained from numerical analysis were shown. This is a result at 200mm. The bubble when the bubble contracted has not fallen intensely compare with the case of the experiment.
33Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Fall of Bubble (ED:Calculation)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300B
ub
ble
Dis
pla
cem
en
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
- 50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
DiameterDisplacement
ED:200mm
ED:400mm
ED:300mm
No Fall of Bubble
Thus, at all the simulations, an intense fall of the bubble like the experiment was not obtained when the bubble contracted.
34Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Comparison between Comparison between Experimental and Calculation Experimental and Calculation
ResultsResults
35Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Comparison of Bubble Diameter (ED200mm)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
ED(200mm:EXP)ED(200mm:CAL)
This is a comparison of the experimental result and the numerical result at 200mm and 300mm in depth.The histories at the first cycle was almost corresponding.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
ED(300mm:EXP)ED(300mm:CAL)
200mm 300mm
36Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Comparison of Bubble Diameter (ED400mm)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
iam
ete
r (m
m)
ED(400mm:EXP)ED(400mm:CAL)
This is a comparison at 400mm in depth of the explosive. The bubble history at the first cycle was almost corresponding. The bubble outside diameter of the numerical result did not attenuate compared with the experiment result. Moreover, the analysis repeated the expansion contraction at a slightly short cycle.
37Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Comparison of Fall of Bubble
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time (ms)
Bu
bb
le D
isp
lace
men
t (m
m)
ED(200mm:EXP)ED(300mm:EXP)ED(400mm:EXP)ED(200mm:CAL)ED(300mm:CAL)ED(400mm:CAL)
This is figure where the falls of the bubble were compared.The analysis was small the bubble fall. It is considered that this is because the condition of the analysis was an analysis in the infinite waters.
38Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Comparison of Pressure History (ED:300mm)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time(ms)
Pre
ssu
re(M
Pa) Experiment
Calculation
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1st PulseEXP: 8.1 (MPa)CAL: 8.7 (MPa)
This is a comparison of the pressure histories at 300mm. The peak value of an initial shock wave hardly changed. However, the time that reached the gauge at the analysis became early. It is considered that this appeared by the difference between the infinite waters and the limited waters, too.
39Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Conclusion
・ It succeeded in the high-speed photography of the bubble within a limited container. The data of the variation with time of the maximum diameter of a bubble or the cycle of a bubble pulse was able to be obtained.
・ It turned out that the maximum bubble diameter becomes small by attenuation as the cycle progressed.
・ In the underwater explosion near the water surface, it demonstrated that involved in and a high-speed flow was made to the bottom. The fall phenomenon of the bubble has been confirmed.
・ Also in the numerical simulation, it could be simulated about the reduction of the maximum bubble diameter and the fall phenomenon of the bubble.
40Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Future Work
・ The simulation that models even the water container is conducted. Whether the amount of fall of the bubble becomes larger when an analytical model with limited waters is used is investigated.
・ The simulation of a Bubble pulse is conducted by more fine mesh. We constructed a parallel computer recently.
41Multiphysics2009, 9-11 Dec., 2009
Kumamoto Industrial Research Institute
Thank you for your attention.Thank you for your attention.