multidimensional measurement of poverty 16 june 2008
DESCRIPTION
OPHI Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative Department of International Development Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford www.ophi.org.uk. Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty 16 June 2008. Bhutan: Overview. Bhutan: Basic Facts. 17 th Century: Emerged as a country. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
OPHIOxford Poverty & Human Development InitiativeDepartment of International DevelopmentQueen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford www.ophi.org.uk
Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty
16 June 2008
Bhutan: Overview
Bhutan: Basic Facts• 17th Century: Emerged as a country.
• Monarchy until 2008 when the first elections were held, fostered by the last three kings. They have finally become a constitutional monarchy.
• Gross National Happiness vs. Gross National Product. However, it is a fast growing country: 2000: 7.2% and 2006: 8.5%.
Bhutan: Dataset
• 2007 Bhutan Living Standard Survey
(National Statistics Bureau-NSB):
-9798 households, representing 125,491
-49165 people, representing 630,000
• Unit of Analysis: Household. All members of a household identified as poor are considered poor.
Objective
• The NSB estimates income poverty (they use the FGT class: incidence (HCR), intensity (PGR) and severity (SPGR).
• Q/ How do figures change when we move from income poverty to multidimensional poverty?
Selected Indicators & Deprivation Cutoffs
Indicator Deprivation Cutoff
INCOMEBhutan Food Poverty Line (Nu 407.98 pc p/month)Bhutan Poverty Line (Nu 1,096.94 pc p/month)
LITERACYNone of the household members is literate (Basu & Foster, 1998)
ROOM AVAILABILITY
More than 3 persons per room (MDG).
ELECTRICITY Not having access to electricity.
DRINKING WATER Not having any of these: pipe in dwelling, neighbour’s pipe, public outdoor tap or protected well. (MDG)
SANITATION Not having flush toilet or pit latrine. (MDG).
Results with Equal Weights:
Each Indicator counts with wi=1
% of People Deprived in Each Indicator
Indicator Number of
Deprived in…
H
Subsistence Income 37,329 5.9
Income 146,100 23.2
Literacy 53,803 8.5
Room Availability 302,803 48.1
Electricity 188,590 29.9
Drinking Water 57,457 9.1
Improved Sanitation
23,006 3.6
Rural vs. Urban: Contribution to overall H
by each Indicator
Rural Pop. Share: 74% - Urban Pop. Share: 26%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Inco
me
Litera
cy
People
per
Room
Drinki
ng Wat
er
Elect
ricity
Santit
atio
n
Indicator
% C
on
trib
uti
on
UrbanRural
H and Mo for different k values
k
Number of
HH Poor in
k or more…
H Mo A
On average
poor in…
1 409,585 0.65 0.20 0.31 1.8
2 224,033 0.36 0.15 0.42 2.5
3 105,417 0.17 0.09 0.53 3.2
4 28,237 0.04 0.03 0.75 4.5
5 4,290 0.007 0.006 0.86 5.2
6 197 0.0003 0.0003 1 6
Income H=23.2%
Rural vs. Urban: Contribution to overall
Mo for different k
Rural Pop. Share: 74% - Urban Pop. Share: 26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6
k
% C
on
trib
uti
on
Urban
Rural
Bhutan’s 20 Districts
Selected Rank Changes:Income Poverty vs.
Multidimensional PovertyDistrict Income
H
Income
Rank
(Ascending)
M0
k=2
M0
Rank
(Ascending)
Rank Change
(H Income- M0)
Thimpu 0.024 1 0.089 5 -4
Gasa 0.041 3 0.231 14 -11
Chhukha 0.203 11 0.142 6 5
Lhuntse 0.430 17 0.210 9 8
Why the changes?
Gasa Lhuntse
Variable H by Indicator %Contrib H by Indicator %Contrib
Income 0.041 3% 0.478 23%
Literacy 0.138 10% 0.270 13%
Room Availability 0.339 25% 0.482 23%
Electricity 0.454 33% 0.485 23%
Drinking Water 0.411 30% 0.216 10%
Improved Sanitation 0.002 0 0.176 8%
M0 0.231 100 0.210 100
Composition of Multidimensional Poverty in Two Districts - Mo with k=2
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Gasa LhuntseDistrict
% C
on
trib
uti
on
of
Ea
ch
In
dic
ato
r
Income Literacy People per Room
Drinking Water Electricity Santitation
Final Thoughts• Income deprivation does not tell the whole story
about deprivation in Bhutan. Ranking districts by income poverty can hide serious deprivation in many other indicators.
• Room Availability, Access to Electricity, Access to Drinking Water: high deprivation in many areas.
• Rural Areas are the ones that contribute most both to income and multidimensional poverty.
Additional Slides (If required for the discussion)
Rural vs. Urban: H by Indicator
Indicator H
Rural
%
Contrib
H
Urban
%
Contrib
H
Bhutan
Subsistence Income 8 100% 0.16 0% 5.9
Income 30.9 98% 1.7 2% 23.2
Literacy 10.3 90% 3.5 10% 8.5
Room Availability 52.5 81% 35.8 19% 48.1
Electricity 40.3 99% 1.15 1% 29.9
Drinking Water 12.2 99% 0.5 1% 9.1
Improved Sanitation
4.6 92% 1.1 8% 3.6
Rural Pop. Share=74% - Urban Pop. Share=26%
Rural vs. Urban: M0 with different k
K M0
Rural
%
Contrib
M0
Urban
%
Contrib
M0
Bhutan
1 0.251 91% 0.07 9% 0.205
2 0.206 97.5% 0.015 2.5% 0.156
3 0.125 99.4% 0.002 0.6% 0.093
4 0.042 99.9% 0.0001 0.1% 0.031
5 0.008 100% 0 0 0.006
6 0.0004 100% 0 0 0.0003
Rural Pop Share=74% - Urban Pop Share=26%