multicast after 9/11/2001 nanog 23

13
Multicast After Multicast After 9/11/2001 9/11/2001 NANOG 23 NANOG 23 Marshall Eubanks [email protected] Rich Mavrogeanes [email protected] Prashant Rajvaidya [email protected]

Upload: harsha

Post on 09-Feb-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23. Marshall Eubanks [email protected] Rich Mavrogeanes [email protected] Prashant Rajvaidya [email protected]. Internet News “Melt-down” 9/11/2001. Web Site Performance 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM Site% Users able to access ABCNews.com0 % CNN.com0 % - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast After 9/11/2001Multicast After 9/11/2001

NANOG 23 NANOG 23

Marshall [email protected]

Rich [email protected]

Prashant [email protected]

Page 2: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Internet News “Melt-down”Internet News “Melt-down”9/11/20019/11/2001

Web Site Performance 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM

Site % Users able to accessABCNews.com 0 %CNN.com 0 %NYTimes.com 0 %USAToday.com 18 %MSNBC.com 22 %

(source: Keynote’s Business Performance /Interactive Week 9/17/2001)

Page 3: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Internet News Performance 9/11/2001

Of course, the “melt-down” was caused by the incredible demand for news after the attacks. Unicast Streaming web sites suffered similar problems, at least from anecdotal evidence By contrast, multicast performed well

– Large Increase in traffic– Roughly 1 Gigabit per second saved at peak– Over time, the multicast peering mesh degraded, but this was NOT due to increased traffic

Page 4: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Eyewitness Accounts “We had a large plasma screen in the iLabs {at Networld+Interop] intended to demonstrate high

rate HDTV over I2. We came in Tuesday morning and were preparing for the first day of the show when word came in about the initial plane crash into the towers. Our I2 Lead, Roy Hockett was able to switch the stream to a CNN broadcast from UMich. We began attracting exhibitors to the display even before the showfloor opened. Once the attendees were on the floor, the crowd had grown to well over a hundred.

“By this point, three things had happened. The crowds around the one display had grown so large as to constitute a fire hazard, all the major news web sites had completely melted down, and CNN was being multicast from several sources. We then started loading multicast tools on every PC in the NOC, from the one driving the large video wall to people's individual laptops. By 10:30 (about half an hour after the floor opened) we had at least 3 large displays as well as a number of normal monitors turned out towards the plexiglass walls.

“Soon after, we had a good number of exhibitors come and ask how to get "the CNN viewer software".

Jim Martin, <[email protected]>

“More than 1,000 copies of StreamPlayerII, our multicast MPEG viewer, were downloaded or handed out on disk between 9/11 and 9/12. We normally average 20 to 100 per day.”

Rich Mavrogeanes <[email protected]>

Page 5: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

ViewershipViewershipSudden increase in Multicast traffic of at least 1000 group members

–Mostly viewing VBrick’s television broadcast–Measured Viewership > 830–But each measured point could have many individual viewers since they multicast locally

BANDWIDTH SAVED IN EXCESS OF 1 GIGABIT / SEC. VS UNICAST

Crowds viewing the 9/11 multicasts at Networld+Interop

Page 6: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast Activityat FIX-West / Mantra

^ 9/11 attack

Note that extra traffic seems to be mostly US - also not all multicast traffic is visible to MantraAttack traffic spurt was so rapid and unusual that we first thought it was a MSDP storm !from http://www.caida.org/tools/measurement/Mantra/session-mon/session-mon.html

Purple is # of group members

Page 7: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast Receivers Week of 9/10

^ 9/11 attack

Two independent monitoring efforts on two coasts saw very similar audience bursts after the attacks

Page 8: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast Receivers in September

^ 9/11 attack^ 9/11 attack

Page 9: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast Activity on 9/11 and after

Sudden increase in Mantra traffic of > 1000 group members– Most of these seem to be television viewers– Known TV viewership > 830– Bandwidth saved approaches or exceeds 1

Gigabit / sec. Performance as seen from MCT was

good.

Page 10: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

The Stability of Multicast How did Multicast Connectivity behave under the attack? We (Multicast Technologies) monitor multicast connectivity as seen by MBGP from our AS. There were no apparent problems on 9/11 However, there were problems starting on 9/13 when the backup power for 25 Broadway

went down. Our connectivity suffered from this.

Page 11: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast Redundancy We (Multicast Technologies) have 3 connections into the multicast enabled Internet. Of the 4642 MBGP prefixes advertised to us recently, 28% had only one route !

Number Routes Number Prefixes % 1 1280 28 % 2 2445 53 %3 917 20 %

The Multicast Mesh Needs to be More Robust

Page 12: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

Multicast As the Generators Ran Out…

^Attack

< 25 Broadway Failure

^ Alternate Access through AUCS

Page 13: Multicast After 9/11/2001 NANOG 23

ConclusionsMulticast Met a Real Need after the 9/11 attacks

– Over 800 video users (at least)– ~ 1 Gigabit / sec of bandwidth saved (at least)

Multicast passed its baptism under fire– Availability when other sites were spotty at best

The Multicast mesh and peering need to be made more robust.