mtd-failuretoprosucute (4)

Upload: christine-paciencia

Post on 14-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 mtd-failureTOprosucute (4)

    1/2

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

    REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

    Quezon City

    Branch 69

    MICHAEL ROMERO,

    Plaintiff,

    -versus- CIVIL CASE NO. 13-12345

    MARIO DINGLASAN,Defendant,

    x------------------------------------------x

    DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

    COMES NOW the defendant by his undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable

    Court respectfully moves for the dismissal of the remainder of this action, with

    prejudice, due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute as provided for in Rule 17 Section 3 ofthe Rules of Court, which provides:

    Sec. 3 Dismissal due to fault of plaintiff. - If, for no justifiable cause, the

    plaintiff fails to appear on the date of the presentation of his evidence in chief on the

    complaint, or to prosecute his action for an unreasonable length of time, or to comply

    with these Rules or any order of the court, the complaint may be dismissed upon motion

    of the defendant or upon the court's own motion, without prejudice to the right of the

    defendant to prosecute his counterclaim in the same or in a separate action. This

    dismissal shall have the effect of an adjudication upon the merits, unless otherwise

    declared by the court.

    ARGUMENTS

    That the case was initially set for hearing on this Honorable Court on ______.

    Within which, the plaintiff failed to attend due some health issues, which through his

    counsel caused the postponement of the said hearing.

  • 7/29/2019 mtd-failureTOprosucute (4)

    2/2

    Thereafter, the case was rescheduled for initial hearing on _______. Wherein, the

    plaintiff managed to attend said hearing.

    The continuation of the said hearing was scheduled on ________. However, due

    to unavailability of the plaintiff, he had again failed to attend the hearing which again

    caused the postponement of the trial.

    That the hearing was reset for several occasion all at plaintiff's failure to actively

    participate in the proceedings.

    That the plaintiff's failure to attend set hearings without any reasonable cause has

    been habitual and has caused not only unreasonable delay and obstruction of the speedy

    disposition of the case but also mental and emotional anguish on the part the defendant.

    WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that the complaint be dismmed.

    Quezon City, ____________

    Alba Diaz Sibal Venus Law Offices

    No. 88 Arch. Bishop Reyes St., Pasig City

    By:

    ATTY. VERONICA DIAZ

    Counsel for the Defendant

    IBP No. : 258147; 11/11/2011 Manila

    PTR No.: 35790; 11/11/2011 ManilaRoll No.: 147025; 04/01/2010

    MCLE No. I- 260135; 04/01/2010

    Contact Number: 357-2468 loc. 987

    Email Address: