msaac meeting sep 28 2021
TRANSCRIPT
MSAAC MeetingSeptember 28, 2021
State of Mutual FSAsFinancial Information as of June 30, 2021
Ernie KnottOCC Financial Analyst
2
• Portfolio Demographics-Ernie Knott
• Financial Performance-Ernie Knott and Ashley Hicks
• Supervisory Information-Cristina Im
Preface: The current mutual population as of June 30, 2021 is “held constant” for financial analysis. Mutual banks began filing the Call Report in 2012 unless they early adopted. Some charts use the median and others use weighted averages. For certain ratios, OCC created “unified” calculations. If the former Thrift Financial Report (TFR) contained the elements to calculate ratios on the current Uniform Bank Performance Report (UBPR), we are able to provide analysis using these calculations dating back to 2007.
Agenda
This presentation will focus on:
Mutual Overview and Trends
3Portfolio Demographics
OCC Charters by Institution TypeOCC supervised 1,194 institutions as of June 30, 2021. Federal Savings
Associations (FSAs) represent 22 percent of OCC charters.
749, 63%
112, 9%160, 13%
52, 4% 69, 6% 52, 4%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Nat'lBanks
MutualFSAs
StockFSAs
TrustBanks
SPs FederalBranches
76% National
Banks, $1.4 Tril (724 charters)
24% FSAs $441 Bil (269*
charters)
Midsize and Community Banks
* Excludes 3 FSAs in OCC's Large Bank Program
96%National
Banks $14.3 Tril (801 charters)
4% FSAs $611 Bil (272
charters)
OCC Supervised Institutions
4
• FSAs represent $611 billion or 4 percent of OCC supervised assets as of June 30, 2021.
• FSAs represent $441 billion or 24 percent of midsize and community bank assets as of June 30, 2021. Only three FSAs are supervised by OCC’s Large Bank Program, but all mutual FSAs are supervised by OCC’s Midsize and Community Bank Supervision Unit.
Portfolio Demographics
OCC Supervised Assets
$0
$185
$370
$555
$740
$925
0
150
300
450
600
750
2Q11 4Q12 4Q14 4Q15 4Q16 4Q17 4Q18 4Q19 4Q20 2Q21# Stock 430 352 277 243 226 209 182 176 163 160# Mutual 219 194 171 160 147 135 128 123 116 112Assets (B) $910 $719 $707 $679 $742 $769 $769 $780 $590 $611
Assets ($
)
Num
ber
5Portfolio Demographics
FSA Charter TrendsThe number of mutual FSAs continues to decline but not as rapidly as
stock FSAs.
11, 50%
2, 9%
9, 41%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Mutual Stock FSAs inMHC structure
Stock
$10.4 Bil $10.9 Bil $5.2 Bil
Covered Savings Associations
112, 41%
26, 10%
134, 49%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Mutual Stock FSAs inMHC structure
Stock
$40.4 Bil $19.9 Bil $550.8 Bil
FSAs by Charter Type
6
• Mutual FSAs and stock FSAs in MHCs (that have not issued shares) represent 51 percent of OCC-regulated FSAs.
• FSAs with total assets of $20 billion or less as of December 31, 2017, may elect to operate as covered savings associations (CSAs). CSAs represented 22 or 8 percent of FSA charters and 4 percent of FSA assets as of June 30, 2021.
Portfolio Demographics
FSAs by Type
7Portfolio Demographics
Mutual FSAs by StateMutual FSAs are concentrated in the Midwest and Northeast. There are three
states with 9 or more mutual FSAs: Ohio (17), Pennsylvania (11), and Illinois (9).
11
52 49
31 2520
33 51
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Less Than 25Yrs 25 to 50 Yrs 50 to 75 Yrs 75 to 100
YrsGreater
Than 100 YrsStock 19% 16% 13% 21% 32%Mutual 0% 0% 10% 46% 44%
FSA Age Distribution 6/30/2021
35 3424
10 9
30 38
25
2641
0%
11%
22%
33%
44%
55%
Less Than$100Mil
$100Mil to$250Mil
$250Mil to$500Mil
$500Mil to$1Bil
GreaterThan $1Bil
Stock 19% 24% 16% 16% 26%Mutual 31% 30% 21% 9% 8%
FSA Asset Distribution 6/30/2021
8
• Mutual FSAs are typically smaller in size than their stock counterparts. Only 8 percent of mutual FSAs have total assets greater than $1 billion versus 26 percent of stock FSAs.
• Mutual FSAs represent some of the oldest financial institutions in the United States. Forty-four percent of mutual FSAs were formed more than 100 years ago. Ninety percent have operated for 75 years or more.
Portfolio Demographics
Mutual FSAs Asset Size and Age
41
35
2320 19
0
9
18
27
36
45
1 Office 2‐3 Ofcs 4‐5 Ofcs 6‐8 Ofcs > 8 Ofcs
Branch Categories of Mutuals
663 663 681 694 700 715 722 740
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
150
300
450
600
750
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 21Q2
Mutual Branch and Deposit Trends
# Branches Core Deps $Bil
9
• Thirty percent of mutual FSAs operate from one location, and 55 percent have three locations or less. Thirty-six mutual FSAs or 26 percent have changed their branch configuration since 2014. Five mutual FSAs have fewer offices today versus 2014.
• Since 2014, the number of mutual FSA office locations has grown 12 percent, but core deposits have grown 41 percent (13 percent through 2019 or pre-pandemic).
Portfolio Demographics
Mutual FSA Branches
The Community Bank Leverage Ratio (CBLR) is an optional simple leverage capital measure that became effective January 1, 2020. The CARES Act provided temporary relief and a gradual phase-in through 2021 due to the pandemic.
10Capital
Cannot be an advanced approaches banking
organization
Total trading assets plus
liabilities of 5 percent or less of consolidated
assets
Leverage ratio greater than 8.5 percent (2021) and 9 percent
(2022)
Total off‐balance sheet (OBS)
exposures of 25 percent or less of consolidated
assets
Total consolidated assets of less
than $10 billion
CBLR Framework – Now Being Phased In
14.3715.13
14.06
11.8012.56
11.79
10.00
11.50
13.00
14.50
16.00
17.50
Mutual Leverage Capital Ratio
OCC FDIC
Asset Category FDIC OCCUnder $50MM 12.55 16.74$50MM ‐ $100MM 12.25 14.07$100MM ‐ $250MM 11.77 14.09$250MM ‐ $500MM 12.17 13.66$500MM ‐ $1B 11.29 13.44Greater than $1B 11.35 11.00
Median 11.79 14.06
Leverage Ratio ‐ June 30, 2021
11
• Mutual FSA capital levels remain strong but lower this year. The gap between federal and state charters remains wide but narrowed to 227 basis points this quarter.
• In general, the smaller mutual charters have the highest levels of capital.
Capital
Capital Levels Remain Solid
25.11
29.33 29.27
20.19 20.18
17.9316.00
19.00
22.00
25.00
28.00
31.00
Mutual Total RBC Capital Ratio
OCC FDIC
100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%0
30
60
90
120
150
Well AdeqWith
AdeqWithout Under Sig
UnderPCA Category 138 0 0 0 0
Num
ber
Mutual FSA PCA Categories‐6/30/2021
12
• Mutual FSA total risk-based capital levels increased in 2021 and are back to their pre-pandemic level. The gap between federal and state charters has widened to over 1,100 basis points this year.
• All mutual FSAs met the “well-capitalized” definition contained in Prompt Corrective Action as of June 30, 2021.
Capital
Mutual FSAs are “Well-capitalized”
66% 66% 63% 61%
33% 32% 35% 38%
1% 2% 2% 2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4 Rated
13Capital
Capital Ratings Remain StrongNinety-nine percent of mutual FSAs are rated 1 or 2 for capital. Only two
mutual FSAs are rated 3. There are no mutual FSAs rated 4 or 5 for capital this quarter.
0.38 0.42
0.50 0.57
0.00
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
ROAA (Adj for Sub S)
OCC FDIC
Asset Category 2021Q2 2020Q4Under $50MM 0.18 0.06$50MM ‐ $100MM 0.27 0.37$100MM ‐ $250MM 0.37 0.30$250MM ‐ $500MM 0.50 0.45$500MM ‐ $1B 0.56 0.62Greater than $1B 0.53 0.65
Median 0.42 0.38
Mutual FSA ROAA by Asset Group
14
• ROAAs for mutual FSAs increased four basis points to 0.42 percent in 2021 and lag FDIC-regulated bank performance.
• In general, the larger the mutual FSA, the better the ROAA.
Earnings
ROAA Up This Year
2.75
2.92
2.60
2.75
2.90
3.05
3.20
3.35
Net Interest Margin
OCC FDIC
3.57 3.32 3.102.89
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
% Avg Assets
Mutual FSA Net Operating Revenue
Net Int Inc Non Int Inc
15
• Mutual FSA net operating revenue fell 43 basis points since year-end 2019. Net interest income fell 46 basis points to 2.58 percent. Fee income rose three basis points to 0.31 percent. Higher fee income remains a key distinction between smaller and larger banks.
• Net interest margins (NIM) continue to compress. NIMs fell 47 basis points since 2019, 22 basis points since 2020, and five basis points since last quarter.
Earnings
Net Interest Margin Sharply Lower
2021Q2 2020Q2 Δ 1 Yr $ Δ 1 Yr %Int Income 853,421 907,478 ‐54,057 ‐5.96Int Expense 120,489 194,514 ‐74,025 ‐38.06Net Int Inc 732,932 712,964 19,968 2.80Non Int Inc 185,009 175,261 9,748 5.56Non Int Exp 719,000 683,479 35,521 5.20Provsion Exp 6,295 35,581 ‐29,286 ‐82.31Gains on Secs 8,143 6,843 1,300 19.00Income Tax 46,250 39,936 6,314 15.81Net Income 154,520 136,059 18,467 13.57
Mutual FSA Income Statement ($000's)
2.805.56
5.20
‐82.31
19.00 15.8113.57
‐40,000
‐20,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
Net IntInc
Non IntInc
Non IntExp
ProvsionExp
Gains onSecs
IncomeTax
NetIncome
Change in Net Income2021 vs 2020
16
• Despite margin compression, mutual FSA net income increased in 2021 due mainly to lower provision expenses.
Earnings
Mutual Net Income Up 13.6 Percent
65 67 68 66 61
10 9 10 13 15
18 18 17 15 176 6 6 6 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017Q4 2018Q4 2019Q4 2020Q4 2021Q2
% Mutual Earning Asset Trends ‐ 6/30/2021
Loans Int Bk Bals+FFS Secs+Trade Acct NonEarn Assets
34.6
17.010.1
31.0
17.58.6
0.0
13.0
26.0
39.0
52.0
65.0
Ln&Ls Sale NetGains
Deposit ServiceCharges
Bank InterchangeFees
Top Noninterest Income Sources
2021Q2 % 2020Q2 %
0.55%0.53%0.47%0.53%0.57%0.53%0.53%
0.57%
0.75%0.63%
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
Mutual FSA Noninterest Income
17
• Fee income is up 6 percent versus one year ago. While fee income to average assets is up from pre-pandemic levels, 62 mutual FSAs or 45 percent reported fee income of 0.25 percent or less this quarter. Lack of fee income diversity has hurt smaller charters.
• At 34.6 percent, loan and lease sales is the top noninterest income category. It has grown 18 percent since last year. Deposit service charges is second and has grown 3 percent since last year.
Earnings
Noninterest Income Improving
56.0
13.8
30.2
57.4
13.3
29.3
0.0
13.0
26.0
39.0
52.0
65.0
Personnel Expense OccupancyExpense
Other OperExpense
Noninterest Expense Sources
2021Q2 % 2020Q2 %
2.50%2.54%2.55%2.57%2.62%2.62%2.67%2.68%2.59%2.43%
0
300,000
600,000
900,000
1,200,000
1,500,000
Mutual FSA Noninterest Expense
18
• Noninterest expense is up 5 percent compared to the same time last year. Noninterest expense to average assets has increased steadily to 2019 but fell sharply in 2020 due to the rapid asset growth from the pandemic.
• At 56.0 percent, personnel is the top noninterest expense category. It has grown 3 percent since last year. Occupancy is much lower at 13.8 percent of noninterest expense and growing faster at 9 percent.
Earnings
Noninterest Expense Growing
80, 71%
19, 17%
5, 4% 5, 4% 2, 2% 1, 1%0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Resi RealEstate
DiverseLender
Comm'lReal Estate
Non‐Lender Ag Lender BusinessLender
Mutual FSA Lender Peer
0.40
0.69
0.34
‐0.33
‐0.70
‐0.35
0.00
0.35
0.70
1.05
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 21Q2
Mutual FSA ROAA by Lender Peer
Comm'l RE Diverse Resi RE Non‐Lender
19
• In addition to asset size and geography, OCC also analyzes mutual FSA performance by peer lender. Most mutual FSAs or 71 percent are residential real estate lenders and 17 percent are diversified lenders.
• Diversified lenders have enjoyed higher ROAAs in recent years.
Earnings
Diverse Lenders Enjoy Higher ROAAs
82.17 81.16
79.52 76.99
70.00
73.00
76.00
79.00
82.00
85.00
Efficiency Ratio
OCC FDIC
Asset Category FDIC OCCUnder $50MM 96.86 95.05$50MM ‐ $100MM 83.05 85.65$100MM ‐ $250MM 82.54 79.83$250MM ‐ $500MM 78.34 80.36$500MM ‐ $1B 75.29 77.47Greater than $1B 70.82 77.69
Median 76.99 81.16
Efficiency Ratio ‐ June 30, 2021
20
• The mutual FSA efficiency ratio peaked in 2016 and has declined in recent years but remains elevated and has hovered above 80 percent since 2014.
• In general, the smaller mutual charters have the highest efficiency ratios. Forty-three of 138 mutual FSAs or 31 percent reported efficiency ratios over 90 percent for second quarter 2021.
Earnings
Efficiency Ratio Remains High
17% 21% 22% 20%
70% 68% 67%65%
13% 12% 11% 15%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
21Earnings
Mutual FSA Earnings Ratings WorsenEarnings ratings have shown some slippage and continue to lag ratings in
other safety and soundness areas. Only 85 percent of mutual FSAs are rated 1 or 2 for earnings.
0.000.00
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
Net Losses to Average Total Loans
OCC FDIC
63.1
5.7 5.6 13.2 5.8 5.0 1.5
‐3
3
‐20
10 9 142
‐50.0
‐25.0
0.0
25.0
50.0
75.0
1‐4 FamLoans
ConsLoans
Comm'lLoans
NonfarmNonresi
MultiFamily
C&DLoans
OtherLoans
Mutual FSA Loan Mix and % Growth
Composition Annual Growth
22
• Mutual FSA loan portfolios are heavily concentrated in residential mortgages. Loan growth was highest for C&D loans at 14 percent.
• Net loan losses are at decade-low levels with a median of 0.00 percent and a weighted average of 0.01 percent. Most losses emanate from consumer loans.
Asset Quality
Residential Mortgages Dominate Loan Mix
0.51
2.24
0.66 0.60 0.57
0.66 0.730.62
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Noncurrent Lns & OREO to Lns & OREO
OCC FDIC
0.460.29
0.37 0.220.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
% Loans & Leases 30‐89 Days Past Due
OCC FDIC
23
• The noncurrent loans plus OREO ratio for mutual FSAs peaked in 2012 and has been on a steady downward trajectory since then.
• While past dues remain low and declining, modification programs in the CARES Act are masking delinquencies for some credits. Fortunately, that pool of loans is declining.
Asset Quality
Past Due Levels are Low
0.92
0.98
0.50
0.61
0.72
0.83
0.94
1.05
ALLL to Loans & Leases Not HFS
OCC FDIC
3.254.03
9.91
14.74
9.457.48
6.195.41
4.35
0.00
3.00
6.00
9.00
12.00
15.00
Bank Provided Asset Quality Ratios
Classified Assets Special Mention
24
• The bank provided classified assets to tier 1 capital plus the ALLL ratio continues to edge lower.
• ALLL levels for mutual FSAs remain stable this year at 0.92 percent of total loans.
Asset Quality
Classified Assets Lower and ALLL Elevated
‐6.06
‐2.20
‐0.05
‐8.00
‐4.00
0.00
4.00
8.00
12.00
Loan Growth ‐ 1 Year
OCC FDIC
Asset Category FDIC OCCUnder $50MM ‐1.23 ‐3.34$50MM ‐ $100MM ‐0.01 ‐2.04$100MM ‐ $250MM ‐1.38 ‐0.64$250MM ‐ $500MM 0.33 ‐3.16$500MM ‐ $1B 1.01 ‐1.55Greater than $1B ‐0.08 ‐3.51
Median ‐0.05 ‐2.20
Loan Growth Ratio ‐ June 30, 2021
25
• Mutual FSA loan growth fell to -2.20 percent compared to 0.12 percent for the prior year. Adjusting for the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), median mutual FSA loan growth improved to -2.10 percent.
• Loan growth was negative for most mutual bank groups. Normally, loan growth is highest for banks with total assets over $1 billion and lowest for the smallest banks.
Asset Quality
Loan Growth Weak
44% 42% 44% 42%
53% 56% 54% 56%
4% 2% 2% 2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
26Asset Quality
Mutual FSA Asset Quality Ratings StrongNinety-eight percent are rated 1 or 2 for asset quality.
4.65
1.341.31
9.80
4.142.78
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
Reliance on Wholesale Funding
OCC FDIC
38.81
31.73
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
On‐Hand Liquidity to Total Liabilities
OCC FDIC
8 9 9 10 11 11 11 1214 15
0
11
22
33
44
55
Billion
s $
% Mutual FSA Nonint Deps to Tot Deps
Interest Bearing Deposits Noninterest Deposits
27
• Mutual FSA deposits grew 13 percent year-over-year and free funds rose to 15 percent. On-hand liquidity ratios are sharply higher and above pre-crisis and pre-pandemic levels. As a result, mutual banks are relying less on wholesale funding sources.
Liquidity
Mutual FSAs are Flush with Liquidity
59% 54% 58% 58%
40% 45% 41% 40%
1% 1% 1% 2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
28Liquidity
Mutual FSA Liquidity Ratings Remain StrongNinety-eight percent are rated 1 or 2. Only two mutual FSAs are
rated 3.
30.72
77.9159.56
95.33
0.00
25.00
50.00
75.00
100.00
125.00
Nonmaturity Deposits to Long Assets
OCC FDIC
9.913.06
73.8665.26
0.00
15.00
30.00
45.00
60.00
75.00
Mutual FSA Maturities > 3 Years
Liabs Mat>3 Yrs to TA Lns&Secs Mat>3 Yrs to TA
29
• Loans and securities over three years after declining for two consecutive years, rose to 65.26 percent. Only 3.06 percent of mutual FSA liabilities mature or reprice in more than 3 years.
• Nonmaturity deposits to long-term assets for mutual FSAs have increased during the pandemic and are at their highest levels in more than a decade.
Sensitivity to Market Risk
Funding Gap Expands and NMD Up in 2021
31% 29% 28% 27%
68% 70% 72% 70%
1% 1% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
30Sensitivity to Market Risk
Sensitivity to market risk for mutual FSAs remains adequately controlled. Last year, no mutual FSAs were rated worse than 1 or 2.
This year, four are rated 3.
Sensitivity is Adequately Controlled
26% 24% 25% 27%
71% 72% 72% 68%
3% 4% 3% 5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
31Supervisory Information
Ninety-five percent of mutual FSAs are rated 1 or 2 for management.
Management Ratings are Satisfactory
16%
2%
31% 29%
81%
2%
67% 70%
3% 2% 1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
IT Asset Mgmt Consumer CRA
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4 Rated
32Supervisory Information
Only four mutual FSAs have trust powers (96 percent are not rated for asset management).
Mutual FSA Specialty Ratings are Strong
31% 30% 32% 33%
67% 68% 65% 62%
2% 2% 3% 5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2018Q2 2019Q2 2020Q2 2021Q2
1 Rated 2 Rated 3/4/5 Rated
33Supervisory Information
Ninety-five percent of mutual FSAs have a composite 1 or 2 rating. There are no mutual FSAs rated 4 or 5 this quarter.
Mutual FSA Composite Ratings are Strong
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
COMP CREDIT IRR LIQ OPER PRICE REP STRATLow 62% 53% 37% 68% 47% 92% 85% 57%Moderate 37% 45% 54% 30% 48% 7% 13% 38%High 2% 3% 9% 2% 4% 1% 2% 5%
34Supervisory Information
The interest rate risk and strategic categories have the most mutual FSAs designated with high risk. Six of the eight risks are predominately
rated as low.
Mutual FSA Aggregate Level of Risk Low
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
COMP CREDIT IRR LIQ OPER PRICE REP STRAT2020Q2 7% 14% 13% 7% 19% 2% 4% 16%2021Q2 6% 20% 19% 7% 19% 4% 5% 21%
35Supervisory Information
Below are the percentages of mutual FSAs designated with either high or moderate and increasing risk. The top four risks are strategic, credit,
IRR, and operational. Of the top risks, strategic, credit, and IRR are showing year-over-year increases.
Some Risks Increasing
7%
26%18%
93%
74%82%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mutuals Stock All FSAs12‐month 18‐month
36Supervisory Information
Ninety-three percent of mutual FSAs are on the 18-month supervisory cycle.
Most Mutuals on Expanded Exam Cycle
1%
29%
0%
23%
3%
19%
5%
16%
4%
0%
27%
5%
4%
5%
30%
16%
11%
2%
0% 8% 16% 24% 32%
Asset Management
Bank Information Technology
BSA/AML
Capital Markets
Compliance
Commercial Credit
Retail Credit
Enterprise Governance
Earnings and Capital
TTM as of 6/30/2021 TTM as of 6/30/2020
37Supervisory Information
Mutual MRAs in the trailing twelve months ending June 30, 2021, decreased by 21 percent. More than half were centered in Bank
Information Technology at 29 percent and Capital Markets at 23 percent.
MRA Volume Down for Mutuals in 2021
33
25
13
24
14
2
34
34
142
63
2
0 3 6 9 12 15
CompositeCapital
Asset QualityManagement
EarningsLiquidity
SensitivityInformation Technology
TrustCompliance
CRAUpgrade Downgrade
38Supervisory Information
Over the last four quarters, rating downgrades exceeded upgrades. There were 30 upgrades and 41 downgrades, which translates to a net
downgrade of 11. Most downgrades were for earnings. Most upgrades were for management.
Mutual Rating Downgrades > Upgrades
39Conclusions
• Composite ratings for mutual FSAs remain satisfactory. Ninety-five percent of mutual FSAs are rated 1 or 2. No mutual FSA is rated 4 or 5. Six of the eight risk categories are rated predominately as low.
• Capital remains strong. Leverage capital ratios are lower this year due to rapid asset growth from the pandemic but remain much higher than peer. Total risk-based capital ratios increased in 2021 and are back to pre-pandemic levels. The gap between federal and state charters expanded to over 1,100 basis points.
• Asset quality is good. Total noncurrent loans fell to a decade low of 0.57 percent. Loan growth is weak. The ALLL is adequate and well above pre-pandemic levels.
• Earnings are adequate. Despite NIM compression, ROAA rose four basis points due to lower provision expenses. More mutual FSAs are adversely rated for earnings than any other rating category. Earnings saw the most downgrades over the last year.
• Liquidity is strong. Mutual banks are flush with liquidity due to pandemic related deposits and a higher consumer savings rate.
• Sensitivity to market risk is adequately controlled. Mutual banks are holding higher levels of nonmaturity deposits relative to long-term assets making them less vulnerable to increases in interest rates.
Key Observations – June 30, 2021
40
Questions
Thank You