ms b - the new york times...ms b mcmanimon-scotland-baumann 75 livingston avenue, roseland, nj 07068...
TRANSCRIPT
MS B McMANIMON - SCOTLAND - BAUMANN 75 Livingston Avenue, Roseland, NJ 07068 (973) 622—1800
Writer’s Direct Dial: 973-622-5378
August 29, 2018
VIA HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J.Ch.
Superior Court of New Jersey
Chancery Division, Hudson County
William J. Brennan Courthouse
583 Newark Avenue, 2nd Floor
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
RE: CITY OF HOBOKEN V. SUEZ NORTH AMERICA and SUEZ WATER
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.
DOCKET NO.: TBD
Dear Judge Jablonski:
Please accept this letter brief in lieu of a nwre formal
brief on behalf of the Plaintiff, City of Hoboken (the “City")
in support of its Order to Show Cause (with Temporary
Restraints) in this matter requesting Defendants Suez North
America and Suez Water Environmental Services Inc.,
(collectively “Suez”), appear and show cause before this Court
why an order should not be issued requiring Suez to:
a. Provide to the City all studies, reports, plans,
agreements or similar documents prepared by or on behalf of
Defendants detailing: i) the scope of construction
occurring on the Chamber or any other part of the City’s
water system, and any preliminary planning or work done to
protect the water system in anticipation of Chamber work,
including but not limited to record drawings (“as—builts”);
1
36730-022: 8023754
ii) any investigation conducted by Defendants or on behalf
of Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks;
iii) any and all claims of costs incurred for the water
main reaks; and iv) all records, from January 1, 2018 to
present, of hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and system
pressure testing (both emergency and routine maintenance)
for the time period prior to and during construction of the
Chamber;
b. Within ten (10) days of the return of the
accompanying Order to Show Cause and the grant of the
aforementioned relief, formulate a plan for determining the
cause(s) of the recurring water main breaks, for review and
ultimate approval by City officials and its relevant
professionals.
For purposes of this letter brief, all defined terms set
forth. in Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint shall be incorporated
herein by reference as if set forth at length herein. Unless
otherwise indicated, defined terms shall have those meanings
ascribed to them in the Verified Complaint.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
In the past six (6) weeks, at various locations, the City
of Hoboken. (the “City”) has experienced. no less than fifteen
(15) water main breaks, including breaks in the month of August
alone on August 6, ll, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2018. The
36730-022: 8023754
August 25, 2018 break involved a 13—inch water main that flooded
parts of Newark and Hudson Streets in the City. On Sunday
August 26, 2018, a 6—inch break caused flooding on l3u‘Street in
the City. Another 8-inch water main break occurred just
yesterday, August 28, 2018, flooding Hudson, River and Second
Streets and threatening the PATH & NJ Transit systems. Enough
is enough.
To date, Defendants have been unable or perhaps unwilling
to determine any cause for the frequency' of the water~ main
breaks. The City cannot continue to sit idly by watching the
continued threats to its residents and property, (both public
and private), along with the omnipresent yet unpredictable
threat of the next break looming' quite literally' around. the
corner. An impaired and unreliable water supply system
presents a danger to the health, safety' and. welfare of the
residents of the City. Immediate action is required by the
City to ensure the water supply system is operating effectively
and the City and its inhabitants are safe. The' City is
obligated to provide clean water to its residents and maintain
effective operation of its water supply system, and must proceed,
without interference from Suez, in preparing a course of action to
determine the cause of the repeated water main breaks and for
36730-022: 8023754
the repair of the existing breaks that have jeopardized the
health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs rely upon the facts in the Verified Complaint
incorporated herein as if set forth at length.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
PLAINTIFFS HAVE MET THE CROWE STANDARDS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS
REQUESTED BY THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
To obtain emergent and interim relief, Plaintiffs must meet
the test articulated in Crowe v. DiGioia, 9O N.J. 189 (1982):
1. Irreparable harm will ensue, unless the relief is
granted;
2. The legal right underlying Plaintiff’s claims are
settled;
3. Plaintiff can show a reasonable probability of success
on the merits; and,
4. The balance of the equities favors Plaintiff. Ed. at
132—134.
It is well settled that in determining whether such relief
should issue, the courts in the State of New Jersey have
approached the analysis from a qualitative and not quantitative
View, balancing the factors to arrive at an equitable result.
See Gen. Elec. Co. v. Gem Vacuum Stores, 36 N.J. Super. 234, 237
(App. Div. 1955) (noting that the standards governing the
36730-022: 8023754
issuance of relief “are not to be looked upon as hard and fast
and sharply defined in scope; rather they are but factors, among
others, which. must be weighed, one with. another. . .”); see
also, Sheppard v. Township of Frankford, 261 N.J. Super. 5, 10
(App. Div. 1992) (stating that “[t]o the extent the factors
[underlying the issuance of relief] are present, the judicial
process is to “migh and balance each factor 1J1 a qualitative
rather than a quantitative manner.”).
In this case, the balancing of the EEQEE factors directs
that Plaintiff is entitled to the equitable relief sought here.
IRREPARABLE HARM
As to irreparable harm, there is no question that
irreparable harm will befall Plaintiff if emergent and interim
relief does not issue here.
The water system is a public system serving a public
purpose, and its systematic failure significantly impacts the
public interest within. the City‘ of Hoboken. Yakus v. United
States, 321 U.S. 414, 440 (1944)1 recognized that courts, in the
exercise of their equitable powers, “may, and frequently do, go
much farther both to give and withhold relief in furtherance of
the public interest than they' are accustomed to go when. only
private interests are involved.” Ed. at 441 (quoting 'Virginia
1Cited with approval by the Appellate Division in Waste
Management v. Union County Utilities Authority, 399 N.J. Super.
588, 520 (App. Div. 2008).
36730-022: 8023754
Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed’n, 300 U.S. 515, 552 (1937). The failure of
the water system is systematic and ongoing, and will continue if
the requested relief does not issue. The immediate threat to
the public at large is palpable and beyond dispute.
SETTLED LEGAL RIGHT
There is no question. that Plaintiffs’ entitlement to the
relief sought rests upon settled legal rights. Defendant Suez
Operating is charged with operating the City’s water system for
the benefit of the City; putting residents and visitors in
danger by failing to supply water and threatening life and
property (public & private) with floods, is antithetical to that
obligation. The City's legal right to temporarily halt further
non—emergency repair construction and be allowed full access to
Defendants' records and reports is beyond question.
The facts of the Verified Complaint make clear the City is
required to provide necessary' services to its residents. Suez
has, to date, provided inadequate or inaccurate information. They
are obligated to share the information requested through this
action with the City, and have failed to perfonn. The City is
required to protect its interests as a result.
LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS
As the law is well settled on the ability and the right of
Plaintiffs to seek the relief sought by this application. and
within the Verified Complaint, its likelihood of success on the
36730-022: 8023754
merits respecting the relief sought by this application is well
established.
BALANCING OF THE RELATIVE HARM FAVORS PLAINTIFF
It is beyond question that the balancing of the relative
harm to Plaintiff if injunctive relief does not issue, against
that which might befall Suez if it does, favors Plaintiff.
In contrast, if such relief does not issue, Plaintiff
runs the risk of continued damage to the water supply system, a
continued disruption of water supply services throughout the
City and the threats posed by constant flooding. Withholding
such relief leaves the Plaintiff and the residents of Hoboken in
limbo and without a remedy. Conversely, Defendants are not at
all impacted if the relief requested is granted.
The balancing of the relative harms favors Plaintiffs.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, this Court is respectfully
requested to enter an Order granting Plaintiff the emergent and
preliminary relief sought by the Order to Show Cause entered in
this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
@6646 W/Véfifv/William W. Northgrave
C743
WWN/wpo
36730-022: 8023754
William W. Northgrave, Esq. (039201990)
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, L.L.C.
75 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
(973) 622—1800
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CITY OF HOBOKEN
THE CITY OF HOBOKEN,
laintiff,
v.
SUEZ NORTH AMERICA and SUEZ
WATER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
INC.,
I
Defendant.
THIS MATTER being brought before the Court by McManimon,
Scotland & Baumann, LLC,
Hoboken (the “City”), seeking relief
forth in the Verified Complaint filed. herewith,
cause shown.
It is on this
Defendant, Suez North America and Suez Water Environmental
Services Inc., (“Defendants”),
Superior Court at the William J.
City, New Jersey at
thereafter as counsel can
of 2018, why
requiring Defendant, to:
a. Provide to the City all studies, reports, plans,
agreements or similar documents prepared by or on behalf of
o’clock
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CHANCERY DIVISION:
HUDSON COUNTY
DOCKET NO. HUD—C
Civil Action
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
attorneys for Plaintiff, City
day of August, 2018, ORDERED that
appear and show cause before the
Brennan Courthouse in Jersey
in the noon or as soon
heard, on the day
an Order should not be issued
based upon the facts set
and for good
Defendants detailing: i) the scope of construction
occurring on the Chamber or any other part of the City's
water system, and any preliminary planning or work done to
protect the water system in anticipation of Chamber work,
including but not limited to record drawings (“as—builts”);
ii) any investigation conducted by Defendants or on behalf
of Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks;
iii) any and all claims of costs incurred for the water
main breaks; and iv) all records, from January 1, 2018 to
present, of hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and system
pressure testing (both emergency and routine maintenance)
for the time period prior to and during construction of the
Chamber;
b. Within ten (10) days of the return of the
accompanying Order to Show Cause and the grant of the
aforementioned relief, formulate a plan for determining the
cause(s) of the recurring water main breaks, for review and
ultimate approval by City officials and its relevant
professionals;
t is further ORDERED that:
l. A copy of this Order to Show Cause, Verified Complaint
and any supporting affidavits or certifications submitted in
support of this Application, be served upon Defendants by hand
delivery within____
days of the date hereof, in accordance with
3. 4:4—3 and 3. 4:4—4, this being original process.
2. Plaintiff must file with the Court its proof of service
of the pleadings on the Defendant no later than three (3) days
before the return date.
3. Defendant shall file and serve a written response to
this Order to Show Cause and the request for entry of injunctive
relief and proof of service by , 2018.
The original documents must be filed with the Clerk of the
Superior Court in the County listed above. A list of these
offices is provided. You must send a copy of your opposition
papers directly to Hon. Jeffrey" R. Jablonski, P.J.Ch., whose
address is: William J. Brennan Courthouse, 583 Newark Avenue,
Efi Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey. You must also send a copy of
your opposition papers to the Plaintiff’s attorney whose name
and address appears above, or to the Plaintiff, if no attorney
is named above. A telephone call will not protect your rights;
you must file your opposition and pay the required fee and serve
your opposition on your adversary, if you want the Court to hear
your opposition to the injunctive relief the Plaintiff is
seeking.
4. Plaintiff may file and serve any written reply to the
Defendant's opposition to the Order to Show Cause by
,2018. The reply papers must be filed with
the Clerk of the Superior Court in the county listed above, and
a copy of the reply papers must be sent directly to the chambers
of the Hon. Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J.Ch.
5. If the Defendant does not file and serve opposition to
this Order to Show Cause, the Application will be decided on the
papers on the return date and relief may be granted by default,
provided that Plaintiff files a proof of service and a proposed
form of order at least three days prior to the return date.
6. If Plaintiff has not already done so, a proposed form
of order addressing the relief sought on the return date (along
with. a self—addressed return envelope with. return. address and
postage) must be submitted to the Court no later than three (3)
days before the return date.
7. Defendant take notice that Plaintiff has filed a
lawsuit against you in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The
Verified Complaint attached to this Order to Show Cause states
the basis of the lawsuit. If you dispute this Complaint, you, or
your attorney, must file a written Answer to the Complaint and
proof of service within 35 days from the date of service of this
Order to Show Cause, not counting the day you received it.
These documents must be filed with the Clerk of the Superior
Court in the county listed above. A list of these offices is
provided. Include the required filing fee payable to the
“Treasurer State of New Jersey." You must also send a copy of
your Answer to Plaintiff’s attorney whose name and address
appear above, or to the Plaintiff, if no attorney is named
above. A telephone call will not protect your rights; you must
file and serve your Answer (with the fee) or judgment may be
entered against you by default. Please note: Opposition to the
Order to Show Cause is not an Answer, and you must file both.
Please note further: if you do not file and serve an. Answer
within 35 days of this Order, the Court may enter‘ a default
against you for the relief Plaintiff demands.
8. If you, cannot afford an attorney, you. may' call the
Legal Services office in the county in which you live. A list of
these offices is provided. If you do not have an attorney and
are not eligible for free legal assistance you may obtain a
referral to an attorney by calling one of the Lawyer Referral
Services. A list of these numbers is also provided.
9. The Court will entertain argument, but not testimony,
on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, unless the Court
and Parties are advised to the contrary no later than days
before the return date.
Hon. Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J.Ch.
William W. Northgrave, Esq. (039201990)
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, L.L.C.
75 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
(973) 622-1800
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CITY OF HOBOKEN
THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CHANCERY DIVISION:
Plaintiff, HUDSON COUNTY
V. DOCKET NO. HUD-C
SUEZ NORTH AMERICA and Civil Action
SUEZ WATER ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES INC.,
Defendants. ORDER
THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, attorneys for Plaintiff,
City of Hoboken (the “City”) (William W. Northgrave appearing)
by way of Verified Complaint and Order to Show Cause, for an
Order requiring Defendants, Suez North America and Suez Water
Environmental Services Inc., (“Defendants"), to:
a. Provide to the City all studies, reports, plans,
agreements or similar documents prepared by or on behalf of
Defendants detailing: i) the scope of construction
occurring on the Chamber or any other part of the City’s
water system, and any preliminary planning or work done to
protect the water system in anticipation of Chamber work,
136730—022: 8023724
including but not limited to record drawings (“as-builts”);
ii) any investigation conducted by Defendants or on behalf
of Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks;
iii) any and all claims of costs incurred for the water
main breaks; and iv) all records, from January 1, 2018 to
present, of hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and system
pressure testing (both emergency and routine maintenance)
for the time period prior to and during construction of the
Chamber;
b. Within ten (10) days of the return of the
accompanying Order to Show Cause and the grant of the
aforementioned relief, formulate a plan for determining the
cause(s) of the recurring water main breaks, for review and
ultimate approval by City officials and its relevant
professionals;
IT APPEARING, that the Court having considered the Verified
Complaint and the letter brief submitted by Plaintiff in support
of the within application, along with all other supporting
papers, and the opposition filed by Defendants (if any), and for
good cause shown;
IT IS on this day of , 2018, ORDERED
that an Order be and hereby is entered requiring Defendants to:
a. Provide to the City all studies, reports, plans, agreements
or similar documents prepared by or on behalf of Defendants
236730-022: 8023724
detailing: i) the scope of construction occurring on the
Chamber or any other part of the City’s water system, and
any preliminary planning or work done to protect the water
system in anticipation of Chamber work, including but not
limited to record drawings (“as—builts”); ii) any
investigation conducted by Defendants or on behalf of
Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks; iii)
any and all claims of costs incurred for the water main
breaks; and iv) all records, from January 1, 2018 to
present, of hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and system
pressure testing (both emergency and routine maintenance)
for the time period prior to and during construction of the
Chamber;
b. Within ten (10) days of the return of the
accompanying Order to Show Cause and the grant of the
aforementioned relief, formulate a plan for determining the
cause(s) of the recurring water main breaks, for review and
ultimate approval by City officials and its relevant
professionals;
IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED, that a copy‘ of this ORDER Shall be
served on all counsel and Parties within days of the
receipt of this Order.
335730-022: 8023724
Hon. Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J.Ch.
This application was
( ) Opposed
( ) Unopposed
436730-022: 8023724
William W. Northgrave, Esq. (039201990)
McMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, L.L.C.
75 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
(973) 622-1800
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CITY OF HOBOKEN
THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CHANCERY DIVISION:
Plaintiff, HUDSON COUNTY
V. DOCKET NO. HUD-C
SUEZ NORTH AMERICAN and Civil Action
SUEZ WATER ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES INC.,
Defendants. VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, City of Hoboken (“Plaintiff” or “City"), having
administrative offices at 94 Washington Street in the City of
Hoboken, County of Hudson and State of New Jersey, by way of
Verified Complaint against the Defendant, Suez North America
(“Defendant”), states and alleges as follows:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff is a municipal corporation of the State of
New Jersey, charged with ensuring the health, safety and welfare
of its residents.
2. Defendant Suez Water Environmental Services Inc., with
a street address of 451 From Road, Paramus, NJ (“Suez
Operations”) is the operator of the water supply system for the
36730-022: 8023735
City pursuant to an agreement first entered into in 1994, as
subsequently amended.
3. Defendant SUEZ NORTH AMERICAN, also located at 461 From
Road, Paramus, NJ 07652 (“Suez Construction") is, upon
information and belief, the entity responsible for, among other
things, the construction of a chamber (the “Chamber”) below
grade in Jersey Avenue beneath the overpass in Jersey City near
the border of Hoboken, for the housing of two water meters
connected to the system providing potable drinking water to both
cities. The construction began on or about June 23, 2018.
WATER MAIN BREAKS
4. Since construction of the Chamber began 6 weeks
ago, the City of Hoboken (the “City") has experienced no
less than fifteen (15) water main breaks, including breaks
this month on August 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 20, 25, 26, 27 and
28, 2018.
5. Specifically, (m1 Monday, August. 20, 2018, a 12—
inch water main break flooded parts of Newark Street and
Jefferson Street in the City.
6. On Saturday August 25, 2018, a 13—inch water main
break flooded parts of Newark Street and Hudson Street in
the City.
7. On Sunday August 26, 2018, a 6—inch break caused
flooding on 13“‘Street in the City.
36730—022: 8023735
8. On Tuesday August 28, 2018, an 8-inch break caused
flooding on Hudson Street, River Street and Hudson Place in
the City and threatened both the PATH System and NJ Transit.
9. To date, Defendants have been unable or unwilling
to determine a cause for the frequency of the water main
breaks or at least unwilling to advise the City if in fact
Defendants have determined the cause.
10. Based on the GIS data provided by Suez Operations
via ArcGIS online, no water main breaks were reported in
2017.
11. To date, there have been 24 reported water main
breaks in 2018.
12. Further, based on the GIS data provided by Suez
Operations via ArcGIS online, in the months of June, July
and August during the prior five years, there have been a
total of 12 reported breaks, as opposed to the 16 breaks
that have occurred just in the past six weeks.
13. An impaired or unreliable water supply system
presents a danger to the health, safety and welfare of the
residents of the City, and immediate action is required by
the City to both ensure the water supply system is
operating effectively and the residents and property in the
City are protected from the dangers presented by near
constant flooding.
36730-022: 8023735
l4. Defendants, as operator of the water supply system
and the entity responsible for the construction of the
Chamber respectively, have refused or been unable to prepare
a course of action to determine the cause of the repeated
water main breaks and for the repair of the existing breaks
that have jeopardized the health, safety and welfare of the
residents of the City.
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
15. Defendant’s ongoing efforts to repair and/or prevent
future breaks have been woefully inadequate and have threatened
the City’s water supply and the general public.
16. Injunctive relief requiring Defendants to cease
construction on all capital improvement projects unrelated to
the repair of emergency water main breaks, until specifically
reviewed and approved by the City of Hoboken, is necessary.
17. Defendants further must prepare a plan of action to
prevent future breaks and immediately provide to the City all
studies, reports, plans or similar documents prepared by or on
behalf of Defendants detailing: a) the scope of construction
occurring on the Chamber or any other part of the City’s water
system; and b) any investigation conducted by Defendants or on
behalf of Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment requiring Defendant,
Suez North America (“Defendant”), to:
36730-022: 8023735
a. Provide to the City all studies, reports, plans,
agreements or similar documents prepared by or on behalf of
Defendants detailing: i) the scope of construction
occurring on the Chamber or any other part of the City’s
water system, and any preliminary planning or work done to
protect the water system in anticipation of Chamber work,
including but not limited to record drawings (“as—builts”);
ii) any investigation conducted by Defendants or on behalf
of Defendants as to the cause of the water main breaks;
iii) any and all claims of costs incurred for the water
main breaks; and iv) all records, from January 1, 2018 to
present, of hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and system
pressure testing (both emergency and routine maintenance)
for the time period prior to and during construction of the
Chamber;
b. Within ten (10) days of the return of the
accompanying Order to Show Cause and the grant of the
aforementioned relief, formulate a plan for determining the
cause(s) of the recurring water main breaks, for review and
ultimate approval by City officials and its relevant
professionals;
c. Awarding Plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs of
suit in bringing this application; and,
36730-022: 8023735
d. Grant such other relief as the Court deems
equitable and just.
McMANIMON, SCOTLAND & Baumann, L.L.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIAM W. NORTHGRAVE
DATED: August 29, 2018
DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL
Pursuant to E; 4:5-1(c), William W. Northgrave is designated as
trial counsel for Plaintiff in this matter.
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & Baumann, L.L.C.
Attorne for Plaintiff
DATED: August ZZ, 2018 By: AWW’ u
WILLIAM W. NORTHGRAVE
RULE 4:5-1 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify in accordance with New Jersey Civil
Practice Rule 4:5-1 that to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief the instant matter in controversy is not
the subject of any other action pending in any other court or of
a. pending arbitration. proceeding, nor is any other action. or
36730-022: 8023736
arbitration contemplated. I am not aware of the names of any
other parties who should be joined in the action.
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, L . L . C .
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DATED: AugustZi , 2018 ByM/rwWILLIAM W. NORTHGRAVE
RULE 1:38-7(b) CERTIFICATION
I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been
redacted from the documents now submitted to the Court, and will
be redacted from all documents submitted in the future in
accordance with Rule l:38-7(b).
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIAM W. NORTHGRAVE
Dated: August 22'1z 2018
36730-022: 8023735
VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT
COUNTY OF HUDSON }
} SS
STATE OF NEW JERSEY }
‘1, Jennifer Gonzalez, Director of Environmental Services
for the City of Hoboken, being of full age and having been sworn
according to the laws of the State of New Jersey, deposes and
says:
1. I have read the foregoing Verified Complaint, and to
the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the factual
allegations contained therein are true.
CITY OF HOBOKEN
WQ-QAVWGgfi6mm:Jeknifer\Gfnzale§_J
. H\a_./
Sworn and subscribed to
before me this QflTH dayof August, 2018
DAISY AMADO
ID # 2405965
NCfiARYPUBUC
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
My Gommlsalun Expires March 22. 2021 rvTvv‘TT‘
36730-022: 802373.4
William W. Northgrave, Esq. (039201990)
MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, L.L.C.
75 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
(973) 622—1800
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CITY OF HOBOKEN
THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CHANCERY DIVISION:
Plaintiff, HUDSON COUNTY
V. DOCKET NO. HUD-C
SUEZ NORTH AMERICA, Civil Action
Defendant.
FACSIMILE CERTIFICATION
I, WILLIAM P. OPEL, ESQ., do hereby certify that:
l. I am an attorney for Plaintiff City of Hoboken (the
“City”) in the above—entitled action.
2. The signature affixed to the within Verification of
Complaint is a facsimile. I certify that the affiant has
acknowledged to my satisfaction and genuineness of her
signature and that the document or a copy with an original
signature affixed will be filed if requested by the Court
or by a party to this litigation.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC
s for Plainti
By:WILLIAM P. OPEL \
Dated: August 29, 2018
36730-022: 8023761