mrigh report - us environmental protection agency · pdf filec process and feed data volume 3...

147
i i MRIgH REPORT Test Report for Risk Burn No. 2 on the Drake Chemical Superfund Site's Mobile On-site Hazardous Waste Incinerator Volume I—Technical Report For OHM Remediation Services Corp. 180 Myrtle Street Lock Haven, PA 17745 Attn: Mr. Gary Jones Technical Manager OHM Subcontract No. 292521-02 oo UD —»%• MRI Project No. 3620-28 ^ or September 4,1997 MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 Volker Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64110-2299 (816) 753-7600

Upload: dangdan

Post on 28-Mar-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

i i

MRIgH REPORT

Test Report for Risk Burn No. 2on the Drake Chemical Superfund Site's

Mobile On-site Hazardous Waste Incinerator

Volume I—Technical Report

For OHM Remediation Services Corp.180 Myrtle Street

Lock Haven, PA 17745

Attn: Mr. Gary JonesTechnical Manager

OHM Subcontract No. 292521-02 ooUD—»%•

MRI Project No. 3620-28 ^or

September 4,1997

MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 Volker Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64110-2299 • (816) 753-7600

Page 2: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Preface

Midwest Research Institute (MRI) conducted sampling and analysis for the Risk BurnNo. 2 testing at the Drake Chemical superfund site's mobile on-site soil incinerator locatedat Lock Haven, Pennsylvania. The Risk Burn No. 2 consisted of three runs (numbered asRuns 5, 6, and 7) and was conducted during the period of February 7-9, 1997. This reportpresents the results for these three test runs.

Mr. Gary Jones was the technical manager for OHM Remediation Services Corp. andMr. Paul Gorman was the project leader for MRI. Dr. Greg Jungclaus was the analyticaltask leader and Mr. Jim Surman was the field sampling task leader.

Approved for:

MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Thomas J. Grant, Ph.D., P.E.DirectorApplied Engineering

September 4, 1997

MRI-Applied\R3620-?.8.sl 11

AR3U633

Page 3: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Contents

Preface .............................................................. iiTables ............................................................... vNomenclature ......................................................... viii

1 Introduction ..................................................... 1-1

2 Operating Data ................................................... 2-1

3 Test Results ..................................................... 3-13.0 Procedures Used for Handling of Data and Calculation of

Emission Rates ........................................... 3-13.1 Method 5 Sampling Data Summary and Particulate Emissions ........ 3-53.2 HC1 and C12 Emission Results ................................ 3-83.3 VOCs and V-TIC Emissions Results .......................... 3-103.4 SVOCs Emissions Results .................................. 3-293.5 PCDD/PCDF Emissions Results ............................. 3-503.6 PCB Emissions Results .................................... 3-573.7 Metals Analysis Results for MM5-MM Samples ................. 3-663.8 Hexavalent Chromium Emissions Results ...................... 3-783.9 Volatile Organic Analysis Results for Feed, Bottom Ash, and

Fly Ash ................................................ 3-803.10 Semivolatile Organic Analysis Results for Feed, Bottom Ash, and

Fly Ash ................................................ 3-833.11 PCDD/PCDF Analysis Results for Bottom Ash and Fly Ash ........ 3-893.12 Herbicides Analysis Results for Feed, Bottom Ash and Fly Ash ...... 3-953.13 Metals Analysis Results for Feed Samples and TCLP Metals in

Bottom Ash, Fly Ash, and Scrubber Water Samples .............. 3-993.14 Feed Characteristics ..................................... 3-1023.15 Continuous Emission Monitoring Results for SO2 ............... 3-104

4 Quality Assurance Report ........................................... 4-14.1 Discussion .............................................. 4-24.2 Audit Samples ........................................... 4-64.3 Data Quality Objectives (DQO) .............................. 4-84.4 Data Review ............................................. 4-8

MRI-Applied\R3«20-28.«l

AR3U6314

Page 4: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Appendices

Volume 2A List of Samples CollectedB Field Sampling Data and Sample TraceabilityC Process and Feed Data

Volume 3D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate ResultsE Calibration Data for Sampling EquipmentF Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Semivolatile OrganicsG Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCDDs/PCDFsH Report on Chemical Analysis Results for HerbicidesI Report on Chemical Analysis Results for VOCsJ Report on Chemical Analysis Results for MetalsK Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Hexavalent ChromiumL Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCBsM Report on Chemical Analysis Results for ChloridesN Continuous Emission Monitoring Data for SO2O Example Calculations

MRI.ApplicdMUSlCKZS.sl IV

Page 5: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Tables

1-1. Risk Burn No. 2—Sampling and Analysis Protocols .................... 1-22-1. Summary of Incinerator Process Operating Data ...................... 2-22-2. Waste Feed and Sampling Interruptions—Risk Burn No. 2 .............. 2-33.0-1. Quantification and Data Qualification Procedure for Estimated and

Non-detect Analytical Results .................................... 3-33.1-1. MM5 Summary Data ........................................... 3-63.1-2. Particulate Test Results (Method 0050) ............................. 3-73.2-1. Hydrogen Chloride and Chlorine Emission Results ..................... 3-93.3-1. VOCs in VOST Traps—Run 5 .................................. 3-123.3-2. VOCs in VOST Traps—Run 6 .................................. 3-133.3-3. VOCs in VOST Traps—Run 7 .................................. 3-143.3-4. Condensate Analysis Results—Run 5 .............................. 3-153.3-5. Condensate Analysis Results—Run 6 .............................. 3-163.3-6. Condensate Analysis Results—Run 7 .............................. 3-173.3-7. Summary of VOST Traps and Condensate Analysis Results—Run 5 ...... 3-183.3-8. Summary of VOST Traps and Condensate Analysis Results—Run 6 ...... 3-193.3-9. Summary of VOST Traps and Condensate Analysis Results—Run 7 ...... 3-203.3-10A.VOST Average Emission Rates in g/sec ............................ 3-213.3-10B.VOST Average Emission Rates in Ib/hr ............................ 3-223.3-11. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) in Twenty Largest Peaks of Train A

VOST Trap Samples—Run 5 ................................... 3-233.3-12. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) in Twenty Largest Peaks of Train A

VOST Trap Samples—Run 6 .................................... 3-243.3-13. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) in Twenty Largest Peaks of Train A

VOST Trap Samples—Run 7 .................................... 3-253.3-14. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in VOST Trap Samples—Run 5 ........ 3-263.3-15. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in VOST Trap Samples—Run 6 ........ 3-273.3-16. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in VOST Trap Samples—Run 7 ........ 3-283.4-1. MM5-Semivolatile Analysis Results ............................... 3-313.4-2. MM5-Semivolatile Concentrations and Emission Rates ................ 3-333.4-3A. MM5-Semivolatile Average Emission Rates, in g/sec .................. 3-353.4-3B. MM5-Semivolatile Average Emission Rates, in Ib/hr .................. 3-383.4-4. MM5-Pesticide Analysis Results ................................. 3-393.4-5. MM5-Pesticide Concentrations and Emission Rates ................... 3-403.4-6A. MM5-Pesticide Average Emissioin Rates in g/sec .................... 3-413.4-6B. MM5-Pesticide Average Emissioin Rates in Ib/hr ..................... 3-423.4-7. Matrix Spike Recoveries (XAD) for SVOCs ........................ 3-433.4-8. Matrix Spike (XAD) Recoveries for Pesticides and Surrogates .......... 3-453.4-9. MM5-Semivolatile Blank Train Analytes Associated with Twenty

Largest Peaks Identified in Sample Trains .......................... 3-463..4-10. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 5 MM5-Semivolatile Train ....... 3-47

MRJ-ApplicdVR3620-28.»l

AR3U636

Page 6: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.4-11. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 6 MM5-Serriivolatile Train ....... 3-483.4-12. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 7 MM5-Semivolatile Train ....... 3-493.5-1. Dioxin/Furan Results for MM5-M23 Samples ....................... 3-513.5-2 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Emissions for MM5-M23 Samples ...... 3-523.5-3. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents Results (1989 EPA Factors) ............... 3-533.5-4. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Average Emission RAtes ................... 3-543.5-5. Surrogate Recovery Results for MM5-M23 Samples .................. 3-553.5-6 QC Resultsfor 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Samples ............... 3-563.6-1. PCB Analysis Results for Blank Train and Method Blank............... 3-583.6-2 PCB Analysis Results .......................................... 3-593.6-3 Results for Laboratory Control Spike of XAD ....................... 3-603.6-4. Initial Precision and Recovery (D?R) Results (% Recovery) ............. 3-613.6-5. PCB Emission Rate for Run 5 ................................... 3-623.6-6. PCB Emission Rate for Run 6 ................................... 3-633.6-7. PCB Emission Rate for Run 7 ................................... 3-643.6-8. Average PCB Emission Rate .................................... 3-653.7-1. Analysis Results for MM5-MM (Metals) Train—Blank Corrected ........ 3-683.7-2. Analysis Results for MM5-MM (Metals) Train, Mercury Results— *

Blank Corrected ............................................. 3-753.7-3. Average Metal Emission Rate (Blank Corrected) ..................... 3-763.7-4. Metals Analysis QAResults ..................................... 3-773.8-1. Hexavalent Chromium Emission Results ........................... 3-793.9-1. VOCs in Feed Samples ........................................ 3-813.9-2. VOCs in Ash Samples ......................................... 3-823.10-1. Semivolatile Results in Feed Samples .............................. 3-843.10-2. Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Ash Samples .................... 3-853.10-3. Matrix Spike Recoveries for Feed, Bottom Ash and Fly Ash ............ 3-873.11-1. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Results for Bottom Ash Samples ....... 3-903.11-2. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Results for Fly Ash Samples ........... 3-913.11-3. QC Results for 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Samples .............. 3-923.11-4. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents Results for Bottom Ash Samples

(1989EPAFactors) ........................................... 3-933.11-5. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents Results for Fly Ash Samples

(1989EPAFactors) ........................................... 3-943.12-1. Summary of Herbicide Results for Feed Samples ..................... 3-963.12-2. Summary of Herbicide Results for Ash Samples ...................... 3-973.12-3. Summary Table for Herbicide Laboratory Control Spike ............... 3-983.13-1. Metal Concentration in Feeds ......................:............ 3-1003.13-2. TCLP Metal Concentrations in Bottom Ash, Fly Ash, and

Scrubber Water ............................................. 3-1013.14-1. Feed Characteristics .......................................... 3-1033.15-1. Summary of SO2 Monitoring Data ............................... 3-1054-0. Summary of Issues/Concerns ..................................... 4-34-1. Performance Audit Sample Results ................................ 4-7

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.sl

AR3U637

Page 7: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

4-2. Specific Objectives for Measurement Data(Effluent Sample Analyses Except Stack)............................ 4-9

4-3. Specific Objectives For Measurement Data(Stack Gas Organic Emissions) .................................. 4-11

4-4. Specific Objectives for Measurement Data(Stack Gas Metals Emissions) ................................... 4-14

4-5. Matrix Spike Results for TCLP Metals Extract of Bottom Ash .......... 4-164-6. Matrix Spike Recoveries and Precision for SVOCs in Bottom Ash and

Fly Ash .................................................... 4-174-7. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Precision Results for Bottom Ash

Samples .................................................... 4-194-8. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Precision Results for Fly Ash Samples ... 4-204-9. Precision Results for VOCs in Ash Samples ......................... 4-214-10. Surrogate Recoveries and Precision Data for VOST Samples ............ 4-224-11. Recovery and Precision Results for Combined MM5 Semivolatile Train .... 4-234-12. Surrogate Recovery and Precision Results for MM5-M23 Samples ....... 4-244-13. PCB Surrogate Recovery and Precision Results—XAD Samples ......... 4-254-14. Initial Precision and Recovery (IPR) Results for PCBs on XAD Resin ..... 4-264-15. Metals Train Analysis QA Results ................................ 4-27

MRI-Appli«f\R3620-28.ll Vll

flR3U638

Page 8: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Nomenclature

acfm Actual cubic feet per minuteCLP Contract Laboratory Program (EPA)dscf Dry standard cubic feetdscm Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg (68°F, 29.92 in Hg)dscm/min Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20 °C, 760 mm Hg

(68 °F, 29.92 in Hg)ECC Environmental Chemical Corp.°F Degrees, Fahrenheitgpm Gallons per minuteIQS Internal quantitation standardL.CS Laboratory control spikeLOQ Limit of quantitationMDL Method detection limitMS Matrix spikeMSD Matrix spike duplicateng Nanogram (10"9 g)PADEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionPCBs Polychlorinated biphenylsPCDD Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (tetra-octa)PCDF Polychlorinated dibenzofiirans (tetra-octa)PQL Practical quantitation limitQAC Quality Assurance CooridnatorSCC Secondary combustion chamberscfh Standard cubic feet per hour (68 °F, 29.92 in Hg)SVOCs Semivolatile organic compoundsTIC Tentatively Identified Compoundug Microgram (10~6 g)VOCs Volatile organic compoundsVOST Volatile organic sampling train for volatile PICsMM5-CR Modified Method 5 sampling train for hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) .MM5-MM Modified Method 5 sampling train for metalsMM5-SV Modified Method 5 sampling train for semivolatile organicsMM5-PCB Modified Method 5 sampling train for PCBsMM5-D/F Modified Method 5 sampling train for PCDD/PCDFMM5-PHC1 Modified Method 5 sampling train for particulate/HCl/Cl2

MRI-Applicd\R3620.28.sl Vlll

1R3/4639

Page 9: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Section 1Introduction

Risk Burn No. 2, consisting of three runs (Runs 5-7), was conducted at the DrakeChemical Superfimd site's mobile on-site soil incinerator during the period ofFebruary 7-9, 1997. Table 1-1 summarizes the test matrix for each of the three runs.

A description of the incineration system, and the sampling and analyses, is contained inAppendix G of the "Trial Burn Plan for the Drake Chemical Superfund Site's MobileHazardous Waste Incinerator," dated September 20, 1996, as amended.

Subsequent sections of this report present results for Risk Burn No. 2 as follows:

Section 2 Operating DataSection 3 Test ResultsSection 4 Quality Assurance Report

The appendices, in separate volumes, provide documentation and supporting data,organized as follows:

Appendices

Volume 2A List of Samples CollectedB Field Sampling Data and Sample TraceabilityC Process Data

Volume 3D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Particulate ResultsE Calibration Data for Sampling EquipmentF Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Semivolatile OrganicsG Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCDDs/PCDFsH Report on Chemical Analysis Results for HerbicidesI Report on Chemical Analysis Results for VOCsJ Report on Chemical Analysis Results for MetalsK Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Hexavalent ChromiumL Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCBsM Report on Chemical Analysis Results for ChloridesN Continuous Emission Monitoring Data for SO2O Example Calculations

MRl-Applied\R3«20-28.sl 1"!

Page 10: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

s &. T*-•o

M

*E«

I

I

w

o

£»

I

II•g

o

W

!tn

M

U_ ,

IfJ5s 9)

S-OOW

Page 11: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

l/i"Sw2I09

05

a ?V f.^ E« esS <

1-3

Z

Page 12: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

09

132PHV5• KM

>>CS•o a

asf "S.^ StU «

e

VI

i•»

<0

w

e

-

Metals

(See Ta

ble G4-7a

•5?t£1m i

E

at :158'ifilI isW «=. co Sii

*

Volati

les +2

0(See Ta

ble G4-9)"

.10

tiles Table G4-9

o~ 1-1 n ^. — C

££

8

fcl) C

18

a|1(0I

Oio

(See

Table G4-6)

ins/

&&

I8

8

PCBs

(See

Table G4-10

1Ia>

o

eat

K.

o1-o5o"o

J_ _ ES ' '

i

<

x:

£ a- ICO «g

<;S

1-4

.flR3|l*6U3

Page 13: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Section 2Operating Data

This section presents incinerator operating data for all of the runs, numbered Runs 5, 6,and?.

The waste feed consisted of contaminated material from the site. Table 2-1summarizes the incinerator operating parameters for all of the runs, presented as averagevalues calculated from process data recorded every 1 min by the control room computerdata system. This data is contained in Appendix C.

Each run consisted of at least 3 hours of actual sampling time for each traversingsampling train, but the actual incinerator operating time was longer due to some differencein the sampling intervals, leak checks, and port changes, etc.

Some waste feed shutdowns and sampling interruptions occurred during the runs, aslisted in Table 2-2.

MRI-Appli«ftR3620-28.s2 2-1

Page 14: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

IA.g

Iaot- inco co

«iu2P-i •= ' — o o

I I32

oyesE3VD

10

o:

c

01

in oo> •»d di i

CO _ O 00

3 s - - S 3

c

c

SS Or^r^^. in in «. !S--SS HIS ssSS.2 «.»35os

O CO (0 •«• _ «.. COT- oo in 3- 2 <o CJ o> inT-'O r-- co j?j CN 8 to f °- fe ^ ^ £; co' °° CDi ( ^— T— * * ^** *** ^_ \'f ^

ooS S. o. gio

CO

0o0"000 T~°o> coin m

CN00•rv?

o inr-_ COT-1 dI I

osife"

o>in m'tS «•00f V 9 fc S r « ffiffi<oi i

.c1-0!0! °. c c cc ccc•§#:>> LLLLLLSr I I | | « Q.Q.SS^Q.Q.Q.

C.

£csH

.CO 01 . Q. 0. Q.D.Q.

S '£ S o. 5Q- = . . C D o g o)J B f e S S i c ^ lI \i iii|| it IPo s« IaglS II S"^

* It« ^ sI 8 S£ ZQ1 II

Page 15: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 2-2. Waste Feed and Sampling Interruptions—Risk Burn No. 2Run 5 (2/7/97)

11:50 Began sampling

13:26 Stop all sampling for scheduled port change14:21 Resume sampling after port change

15:01 Stop all sampling. Ash discharge conveyor kicked out15:04 Resume sampling

16:00 Finish Run 5

Run 6 (2/8/97)11:00 Began sampling

12:44 Stop all sampling for scheduled port change13:31 Resume sampling after port change

15:14 Finish Run 6

Run 7 (2/9/97)10:45 Began sampling

12:29 Stop all sampling for scheduled port change12:56 Resume sampling after port change

14:39 Finish Run 7Failed final pitot leak check on SV train. It was decided by EPA et al. to use pitotreadings from the PCB train (done at the same level) and the volume sampledfrom the SV train to calculate isokinetic on the SV train. Result was good (101 %isokinetic) so SV train valid.

MRI-Applied\R3<S20-28.s2 2~3

AR3U6l*6

Page 16: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Section 3Test Results

3.0 Procedures Used for Handling of Data and Calculationof Emission Rates

Subsequent subsections of this report present analysis results for many analytes inseveral different matrices. Those results were used to calculate emission rates for theanalytes, for the purpose of risk assessment. Considering that purpose, it was appropriateto develop procedures for handling data that represented values at or below the detectionlimit (i.e., "< values"). Also, some of the analytical results involve multiple samples (e.g., 4VOST trap pairs per run), so procedures were needed for summing values that may involvenoh-detects, estimated values, and quantified values. MRI and OHM cooperated indeveloping procedures for handling the above situations for the Drake Chemical SuperfundSite risk burn stack results for the test reports. Although different variations of theprocedures are certainly possible, it is believed that the procedures developed herein areuseful and also provide rational methods for handling the data and calculating emissionrates.

Procedures developed for calculating emissions that involve summing of results formore than one component, some or all of which may involve non-detect results, aredescribed in Table 3.0-1. That procedure stipulates substituting one-half the detection limitQ/2 DL) for non-detect values, that may then be used in calculating a sum. The procedurealso specifies some specific data qualifiers for data sums, as follows:

XI Indicates that the sum consists entirely of non-detect (ND) values.(Use V4 DL for ND values.)

X2 Indicates that the sum includes ND values that represent more than 20% ofthe total.

X3 Indicates that the sum includes ND values that represent less than 20% of thetotal.

X4 Indicates that the sum includes ND values and estimated values (J) thatrepresent less than 20% of the total.

MRI-Applied\R3«20-28.S3

Page 17: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Indicates an estimated value, above the MDL but below the PQL. Also usedwhen sum includes estimated values but no non-detect values.Applied to all TIC data, since there are no detection limits for thosecompounds that are only tentatively identified and only semiquantitated.

MR!-Appli«J\R3620-2S.S3 3-2

AR3 11*61*8

Page 18: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.0-1. Quantification and Data Qualification Procedure for Estimated and_____________Non-detect Analytical Results_________ __

1 Where non-detect values are used in a summation or a quantitation, they aretreated as one-half of the stated detection limit (Yz DL). When presenting thequantitated number, it is stated followed by an X1 flag if all values going intothat sum or quantitation are less than the DL.

2 Where non-detect values are used in a summation or quantitation along withquantified numbers, Vs. DL is used in developing the quantity and the data isflagged with one of two following flags:

X2 To signify that 20% or more of the quantity presented is from a non-detect result.

X3 To signify that less than 20% of the quantity presented is from a non-detect result.

3 Where non-detect values are used in a summation or quantitation along withestimated (J flagged) values, 1/£ DL is used in developing the quantity and thedata is flagged with one of the two flags provided in 2 along with the J flag.

4 Where quantified values, non-detect values, and estimated values are allincluded in the summation quantity, 1/£ DL is used in developing the quantityand the data is flagged with one of the two flags provided in 2 along with the Jflag, except when the estimated and non-detect values contribute less than20% of the total. When this is the case, an X4 flag is used.

5 Where quantified values and estimated values (but no non-detect) areincluded in a sum, the data is flagged with the J flag. When J flagged data isused in a sum, the J flag is dropped if the J flagged result(s) contribute lessthan 20% of the total.

6 The B data flag is used if the blank is equal to or greater than 20% of thesample result. When B flagged data is used in a sum, the B flag will bedropped if the B flagged result(s) contribute less than 20% of the total.

(continued on next page)

MRI-AppW\R3620-28.S3 3-3

Page 19: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.0-1 Continued(Quantification and Data Qualification Procedure for Estimated and Non-detect

Analytical Results)

Data Qualification Flag Definitions:

U

J

B

X1

X2

X3

X4

Z

Note:

Note:

Note:

Compound not detected.

Estimated value.

Indicates that a measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.

100% of this quantity is from non-detect data using 1/z of the detection limit todevelop the quantity.

Greater than 20% of this quantity is from non-detect data using 50% of thedetection limit to develop the quantity.

This data contains non-detect values, but they contribute less than 20% toquantity.

This data contains non-detect values and estimated values, but theycontribute less than 20% to the quantity.

Tentatively identified and semiquantitated.

The < sign will not be applied to values developed using this procedure.

the

This procedure is not to be used where the method has a specific method ofhandling non-detects (e.g., Method 23 for dioxins/furans, where non-detectsare to be treated as a zero for summation purposes).

This method should be employed on method or field blanks whereappropriate.

MRl-Applie<RR3620-28.S3 • 3~4

1R3U650

Page 20: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.1 Method 5 Sampling Data Summary and ParticulateEmissions

Each risk burn run included sampling of stack emissions with six EPA modifiedMethod 5 type sampling trains, which provide data on stack velocity, etc., as given inTable 3.1-1. In conjunction with one or more of the sampling trains, a composite bagsample was collected and analyzed for O2 and CO2 by Orsat. Data from the sampling trainsare presented in Table 3.1-1 along with the Orsat results for O2and CO2. The average stackflow rate as calculated from the sampling trains employed during each respective run is alsogiven and was used in later emission rate calculations. Sampling train identifications are asfollows:

MM5-CR Modified Method 5 sampling train for hexavalent chromium (Cr+6)MM5-MM Modified Method 5 sampling train for metalsMM5-SV Modified Method 5 sampling train for semivolatile organicsMM5-PCB Modified Method 5 sampling train for PCBsMM5-D/F Modified Method 5 sampling train for PCDD/PCDFMM5-PHC1 Modified Method 5 sampling train for particulate/HCl/Cl2

Table 3.1-2 provides the particulate test results determined from the EPA Method 0050sampling trains.

MRI-AppIied\R3«20-28.S3 3-5

AR3U65

Page 21: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

«"efl

£fc*

SSst/3*

.•4

*".1

^ »

3H

(DCDS(1)f

£2

"5cCOCO

O

150=ASO

CO

o 'oCO Oto o>

to

S5

"o °-eo Ew .8

.,_,0>

o£L

"c cco oP -20 COQ. 0

0)H0)Q.

COCOo £tlCOCO

gP

CO

112

1s

IE-oCOc•

c""*-"

s>"

(1)

o•n

CO1oc«•id

E•D

•E1

CM O) CO O CO 00O) f— f— CO Cn O)in CD CD in in in

o o o o o oo o o o o oCn en OO 00 O f—

CM CM CM T- CM Oil

O O O O O Or- T- 0 CM T- •*T- T- CM 0 T- T-

CM CM CM CM CM CM

** i- •* CO t- CMCO O O Tf O TOO) O O O) O O)

in co **• N. •* inco oo oo co oo co

oo oo c- T- in ooco - CD r>- co coin m in in in in

CM co in in co ino o o o o o

T- O O) O O) OT- T- O T- O T-

oo m i^- co o oo•* T- T- in i CDO T- T- Tf O O

o> eo CM co CD inco in co co in CN0) T- •<- OJ O 0CM CO CO T— CO CO

CM CM CM CM CM CMO> O) O> O) O> O>

ol 99? :Ein in in in in in

"o 2 2 2 2 2 Sg 2 2 2 2 2 2o:

f- I - CD CO !•>• CO COo> O) o T— in h— O)in in CD CD in in in

O 0 0 0 0 O 0o o o o o o oT— T— f 1 Is- CO O)

CM CM OI CM T- Ol Ol

O O O O O O OOl CO <O 0) 0 CD CMT- T- O T- O O Y-

Ol CM CM 01 01 Ol 01

OO CM h*- T— O) st*co o o) in o> h-O) O O) O) O O>

Im m co in CD cooo oo co oo oo co oo

in eo r- 05 o oo ooco <o' •* co' si co' CDin in in in in in in

n•*t in in in in in ino o o o o o o

o o t- T- T- o •*-- ------

e» -e- o> CM o 0101 co co eo o 01

CO O) O CD CD COO OO T- CD T- !>«.T- Ol CO CO T- T-

CO CO CO T— CO CC

o o o o o oCM Ol Ol CM Ol Ol

a) x o y= a: > 2o> a. a. a o co 2E in in in in in in§J<o2^St^^:S!< §222222

o:

Ao i- T- co m •£- coo) en T- co en <2 o>in in to co m w in

ft0 0 O 0 0 O 0o o o o o o oo> en co m o en oO O T- OI T- O T-01 Ol Ol Ol Ol OJ Ol

£1

O O O O O O Oen en co CD o en 010 0 O Ol •«- 0 T-Ol Ol Ol OJ Ol CM CM

or - T- T- co T- coCO O 0 CM r- f-cn o o o) o o>

in in co •* N. t ineo oo oo co oo co co

Im . in co to it- •* coCD CD* " CD CD' CO* Co'in in in in in in in

o o o o o o o

If- CO CO CO CO CM CO- ------

co o en T- co enf— S- f— O •* OT- T- CM m T- T-

T- co T- o oo enco f- in 01 co coT- CO Tl- Tf CM T-

co co co T~ co cr

o o o o o oCM 01 Ol CM CM CM

o> £ CX Q O CO 5ICO i i I i i I£. in in in in m m>s.«£22:^^25«2:< §222222

Q:

CO0CO

Soio2CM

inT-

S

o

co1-

rage:

CO

<C.

o2•£coocT -10 BCO >S co3 C"8 ^i- CO.E "5.2 E•*- coeo coC QJ

2 E*|-ic E >•- *- -aI £D cO O co

CB £ g

0 CO S

Q) C C gjo 5 Q-

|iiin E °^ $>D-° E| 2HiCO iZ 3£00

jo c of"\ O t0

*o S8) CO 0ID CO j£2CO -Q O

3-6

A-R3U652

Page 22: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

oIT)OO•co•frugS"3W5£M•4-J

1m-4-»«1• Ml•c«PH•

«?i-t.Vfi0)3S

•oisl

on rat

e

OT

Eo>Q)S.iraa

c o •=f~ S"o

£ 3Rs^SsISQ O

^ O0- o

:=-

-%

o>

1•=•c-en

c"Es

0"o#

• 8lfc<o § S- <i!°§ll

£.O)

»0)sg

(0n."rag

in

"to13

I

1 °¥J 1 s<£g

- c ac •= c _§TJ-=S§E£

<£S

»- oo f-J enCJ T H To o o o

. _. 1 «,r CO "f"! TS § S 8o o d\ o

1

CM O> t>-CM •«- «-

(O CO tO

I I Io o o

•* to •*0 0 0

00 O> CDSrJ ^*- 1—

CM CM O

d d d

o in (o00' t- ID

m (o <oui ui •*

ID O) OCM T^ CM

10 co r--c c c3 3 3o: a: a:

gD.Es i« SE 10) C£ ^ ____ g"S CM O1 28 I1 * 1< "^ Ig . i T J6. « S-. (vj 3

1 t |'o> Sc. 8 iI I ^1 °- 1-rj i=T- £ £

<u o *^=£7 4I- & E.

Jl 1§ S 8£ CO 0)

•g i "ra <^ £

^i &^ •§ sb= cr $

^# ig.?. ^fs 1S 7 ~. ft £ o

^i| S""88 •§•^ a S 2-° S -S c,<o -o g•~o g «E § S .2o « c£#£ lEm a v -o

3-7

Page 23: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.2 HCI and CI2 Emission Results

A 25-mL aliquot of the 0.1 N sulfuric acid impinger samples from the Method 0050sampling train was analyzed for chloride, representing HCI emissions. Likewise, a 25-mLaliquot of the combined caustic impingers samples was analyzed for chloride, consideredattributable to C12 emissions. These aliquots were analyzed by ion chromatography perMethod 9057. The results are shown in Table 3.2-1, where, in all cases, the measuredconcentration was below the detection limit. A value of Vz D.L. was used to calculate theemission rates shown in Table 3.2-1. If the blank values had been used to blank correct thedata, as allowed in Method 0050, the blank corrected emission rates would be zero.

Matrix spike recovery for the acidic impingers was good (97%), but was somewhathigh (128%) for the basic impingers, which is above the method limit of 90-110%. Thiscould indicate that the reported C12 emissions are higher than actual.

Audit samples prepared by the MRI Quality Assurance Coordinator (Q AC) weresubmitted for analysis and those results are discussed in Section 4.

MRI-Appli«RR3«20-28.S3 3-8

Page 24: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

M"33e

*SW

1oIS

e

."223y'eW)

1

a»— i•

3tM

£•Z»

i!§E5 !

D)

^f

in ^o ^"'w10)

O -JJ-T~ 33

Ic'in "tT(0 $E I0> SO

O i" *

o '£

5"iO oS n>w S

g* 1"O (/)

«5o s

wW OP °m *~*

.*¥ E 1S 8 § S

t"g -s§|i.0 *^

Is A•II 3c* P

1 Q 51 Si*

8 <b _| £ d2 ID — *0 S

X?UJCDcn

X

?IllCNI

Sco9UJ

•*

XoHitn

X X^ in9 9UJ UJ•<• oin CD

fe

X X^^UJ UI^ *~tri co

SCM

X XCD 005§S55CO O

X X

88o o

3 13O OO OV V

O '•S

•§ 1c(£

>< X

? ? 9UJ UJ UICM CO CO•^ ^ ^

X X

5 5 ?UJ UJ LUin co r*.

X XCO CO CO9 9 9LU LU UJO O> r-*f CO "

X X

9 9 9UJ UJ UI•<- O) CMin •* in

XX XX g1

9 <? 9 ? SUl UI UJ UJ <

TT K •* T-

8 0

XX XX

8 ? 99Ul UJ UJ UJo in t«- T-iri r TT r

en co~ T~

CO CO

XX XXCD t" IO CD

5 1 5 §

fe S fc ?JCM 'S1 O> h-CO O CM O

XX XX88 88o o o o

^ Z> Z) 3o o o o o oo o d o o oV V V V V V

.2 -| .a | .a i

1 Q§<0I<0" fc CO

18

_i .o *>»5 75o c•5 c<j» «• «? j; T3

*fc 1 yj © j^

= S ell8 J5 1 *EC <D t- C

1 . & I i §-c § 1 £ 1 *~io .2 c J> ra to cow 5 -^ > c u-

* <5 co 'c m CM 5 S2S"S -o S *- * -^ffl ^ C o *O

111 ^=§1 g.*5Ufi-i ^^cj l^T3 — J W Si*S Q 8 -g 8 "(Sl|| i 11> '§ ro S. ?0W 2 3X

3-9

A.R31 1*655

Page 25: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.3 VOCs and V-TIC Emissions ResultsVOST trap samples were analyzed for the target volatile organic compounds using

purge and trap GC/MS analysis, specifically as described in SW-846 Method 5041. Thefront trap (Tenax) and back trap (Tenax/charcoal) from each sampling period weredesorbed together and analyzed as a pair.

Two VOST trains were used for sampling in each run, referred to as Train A (4 pair)and Train B (3 pair). VOST trap pairs from Train B were analyzed by selective ionmonitoring (SIM) for all the target compounds (except benzene and 2-butanone), but theSIM results are shown only for those analytes that were not found in full scan analysis ofTrain A samples. The results of the VOC concentrations found in the traps, by full scan orSIM, are given in Tables 3.3-1, 3.3-2, and 3.3-3.

It should also be noted that the high benzene levels in the VOST traps saturated theGC/MS, requiring quantitation by a secondary ion. Since the benzene level was abovethe calibration range, the reported values may not be as accurate as for other analytes. Thebenzene levels also necessitated quantitation of 1,2-dichloroethane using a secondary ion.

Tables 3.3-1, 3.3-2 and 3.3-3 include surrogate recoveries for the VOST trap pairs.Recoveries for two of the three surrogates met the QA objective of 75-125% for all but onepair in Run 5 (153%). Most of the recoveries for the third surrogate (1,2-dichloroethane-d4) were above 125% due to interference from a coeluting benzene peak.

Condensate samples collected in the VOST sampling trains during each run were alsoanalyzed, by full scan and SIM, and those results were used to calculate the correspondingconcentration of each analyte in the gas stream, as shown in Tables 3.3-4, 3.3-5, and 3.3-6.Like the VOST trap samples discussed above, the results for condensate by SIM are shownonly if they were not detected in the full scan analysis. For any values that were below thedetection limit, a value of one-half the detection limit was used in calculating the amountsand concentrations.

The concentrations of each analyte determined from the VOST traps and from thecondensate were added together to determine the total concentration of each analyte, asshown in Tables 3.3-7, 3.3-8, and 3.3-9. Those concentrations were then used to calculate

MRl-Appl*d\R3620-28.S3 3-10

Page 26: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

the emission rates for the analytes in g/sec and Ib/hr. Tables 3.3-10A and B show theaverage emission rate for all three runs.

In addition to the specific list of VOCs, the Train A trap pair full scan results wereused to tentatively identify and semiquantitate the V-TICs in the 20 largest peaks. Thoseresults are given in Tables 3.3-11 to 3.3-13. As expected, many of those peaks could notbe specifically identified (e.g., branched alkane, C8-C10). Results in Tables 3.3-11 to 3.3-13 for TICs in the 20 largest peaks and results given in previous tables for target analytes(Tables 3.3-1, 3.3-2, and 3.3-3) were used to compile the list of 20 largest peaks for eachrun, and their emission rates, as shown in Tables 3.3-14 through 3.3-16.

MRI-AppUed\R3620-28.S3 3-11

Page 27: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

ia2HHt/3O

(JO

•3

•S d if.K §11

H1

o

ro

J2 CO CMQ.

CO T-a.

££

jCJ

mcb S-S

'ra CMCL

'S -Q.

„_ X „ CO C Q C Q C Q C O C O C OX -3 CQ ->• CQ -3 X -s -3 -3 -3" CQ -5 CO -i CQ -3' -i ->

, _ _ _co' o' CM' CD "9 9 d 9 ci 9 *-' o' CM' d 9 o' o' o' N. "? o' T-: "t o d do o o o o o o o

co 111 CO CO CO CD CO CO-3-3 X -3 CQ -3~CQ -3 X -3"-3-3-3~CQ-3"CO-3'CQ -3" -3"

COCO —3 —3 CQ CQ CO a

CO p CM CO *f CM W O O) CM v *t COd cxi T-" CM o' d co' o' CM o' S ° °>

*- CO T- tN -

CQCQ -3~ -3 CO CD CQ a,

<O r-; CM CM CO CM CM 05 CM CO in CM COd ^ ^ *f d d m" N-' cri co" JG ro

CQ CQ -3 CQ

*-i*-*-i-*-lOf-i-i-T-v-COv«-^-T-T-^-cqT-;r-;'(fCO<-CO'J;o' d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ-3 CQCO O>

-C M C O D

01 e»t~; O) O> O) CO CM CM CO CO CM COo ^ - ^ c M o o ' c o ' T f o i r ^ v ^

t- U) ^

IO ' *- - •?; «»; • T- CO i- CO ind do do CM CM d T-' °

COCM

C D 1 ' ' O O 1 ' ' W ' C O ' C O ' C O ' ' C O O C O C O O C P^- •<»• T- f - ^ - C O f - O

CQ -3 - 3 - 3 * - 3 " - 3 " "^"T"-^" 01

0 - 3 - 3 -3 CQ -3 -3 -3 -i -3" -i ->->-}O C M O C M * - 1 ' C O C M ' C M ' C O I - ^ ' ' ' ^ - ' C O ' C O ' T f ' ' C O O C Ol « T"

CQ CQ CO CQ COo - 3 - 3 -3 CQ -3 -3 - 3 - 3 " -3" -i -3 -i

c o r - T - ^ r c M ~~ " ^-.Sj *~

h." > i i i • i h - ' ' ' ' - c o 1 • • ' *- • ta • ' c n ' c M i n h - C_CM T- g g CM

oO

lg ||I !§<D| 8 1 „ ! ! o It1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 g 1 1 1 1 1 s § |

. 3-12

AR3U658

Page 28: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

a.2HL_ t 8H »

c"

C5H

X ,_ 03 X CO" CO CO COX -3 -> CO -300 CD X -3 CD

di8>«, o ""' --- — - - . - - - . - - — — — _ _ _ _ _ _ — . _ . _5575 »S IT -B «•> r»i d rj i>: P P d d P o° P CM d d cg. P d P d d d d *" X X d d d >J O- .-. •CO £m a &.

c•ffi ~

8.0 *== a 'vI s g(2 §-5

<£-

SILL. fn

iK. CO *•}• T— * O5 IO (D ' * CO CD * ' ' **f O)'S •>>•a.

CM

.1 1U. CQ

oCM o CM t-: °. °. o o °. d °. CM o o N. °. d °. o o ci o "*. **. d o doo o o o o o o o

X^_ X ^ C Q X C O ' m c Q C QX -3 -3 CO -3 CO CO X -3 CO -3" -3~ -3" "3" -3 -)

°^«tSO'-:T"<D-» xt £ " CO CM CM «> 0 -- 10 •» « S S

a" ™

CQ ^. ±J > = S .

CO CO -3~ CQ o»

^ CM CO' 0 CM I-' O) 00 O CO

CQ 03 COh- <D *t l O C O C O ' O COCO C O C O Nd ^ T^ T^ r V co' t^ co ° °

CO CQ CD CQ10010

a a 0 «-' ^-" CM *t O

TT <r; 1; T- CM CM COo' o' d - d d CM

e O T - r - ^ C O - ^ C O t

CQ CD CD CO

c o v e n

CQ CQ CQ CO

O J O S C M

§ s s § s • • m sCO *"

C O O ' ' ' C M O O ' ' ' i n ' C O ' O ' C M ' ' C O O C O COI^.COcCQ

« C t-rs CQ m eo m «p *-3" -i '"3" -i ->

h- ' »- CD to ' ' C O C O ' ' ' h - O ' ' " r - ' t M ' T O C O 1 ' '«OCO*- N-COC3r » T - ^ r m f- rt*- t- i- ^ - ^ e i ^ - ^ - o- - -^ ' !3 TS sr m w « -,tM u> (0 -o > ro „!,-s - T .ph-

c n t ' ' ' ' ' ' C O ' l ' l l C O ' ' ' ' ' ' C M ' ' ^ > > C M U ) h - ^ g

tE

g' i

. 'iisi. 1 . « 1 i III 111c ««£ e s o 2 I I m 2 S o > EP 8m «. « i f ee c u

IiiI|l!lii!!S!iIIii|lii tiN(JOOT-"T-"|-l-T-"H>CDCQmOOQ*LUJoj2

"isllSl

!i!ien

s-e E Et S 3 3 _ro S co co to .«111 II II II -11 II T- CM m £CO -> X ><

eo —X t

1

«

-a.O t3>

s gS S' rf.

S

£

SIsi*£

3-13

AR3U659

Page 29: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

es

I2H

O

SC Q C Q X m m " m m m

X-^-^CO CQ •» -i" -3" - -T" - CD "S" "T"CQ -> "J ~r> w-».%- • _ « _ * . b l k . V - V - t t . O . L I b . ' — —

• a - - a - m c » c o o c M x - _ c o c o i n o t n T - ^ C M i - . o ^ c o _ M - o o o o > c M C D C o ^Q

tod ? S8£

irs fo

rj^ 'CO •»•

Q_

°5j CO

Mra g"Ira

mCQ CQ —3" —3 CQ CO a

CD CD CO( CO( C O C O C O * ~ C O C f ) l O O O N - Od ^ W d CM m d d i^ ' 10 iri co S° ° °

CQ

*s- CM *t ^ CM <o to ' -<j- co t- i*- cncocon — la a d i-: ^ ^ T-' CM d in d ri co (D CD o9

CQCQ CQ ~i" - CQ

<O O)(D^- r ^ - f - C O ^ - N - C N O O C D CN

CO CMQ.

. C4 CO .CQ -j X X X

CO.fc

IIE E

d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

O.<N

s-g.a

^ J - C O C O C O e p C M T - '-r d T-' co °. °. o °, °. °. c\i o ci o °. o °.•» d T- a> «. ". d «-» H ". CM d d d «. d H d «. ^ o « ^ d d oo o o o o o o o o o o

^ _ C Q C Q X C Q C Q ' C Q C Q C Q

CM

a a o W »-' W m m o e>' ri i^ ri co

If) CO COc o x - c o C O C M C N r ^ c g i o C O C O T -C> o ' c 3 r - ' c D C > r^ d ^ *~

ca CQ m m CQ

C O f - C O C N li ' e o r ~ ' • ' C O T - ' ' ' ^ j - ' c M ' o ' c M ' ' C M C O O co-^f

CQ"3-3 -3 -3 -3 -3 C Q C Q o t

C D C O C O h - C O ' ' i n t o 1 ' ' O r - ' ' I IO ' U> ' O ' ' ' 'f-Of- x-TCf - O f - C O C M CM *fr*- i- CM CMCM CMU3CM «

"5"^ "1 • -O -9 - -J H" -J "9* -S" wO C O C N J C O ^ - ' ' C O C N J ' ' 'O)O' ' ' U) ' CO ' O. ' OJ ' ' C O O C O (O-^J-O O O ^ - e O C J CN CO^- r- T- x-^- r1*"^-CO T- «- T-co

•^-o ^CQ —i ~? ^ —£ —3 -»" ->" -»" a

t ^ - COCN T- CO *- T- ^ r - T - C D T - OT— J^ T— t- v

io« « * i • • i ^ - i t i i io' ' ' * ' ' h - ' « t r > ' c M ^ r c o

CM

SCO Tfo> o

g'

0

O

*C( s c e ^ r a c

i ii l

I W *- S S T3i=.tet?E

ll*l»1 gl«5liSitfi

1111i

««,.,

iI

3-14

AR3U660

Page 30: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

V3

ie:w*v>

"5e

•OOU

M i_ •?•to TI o E0) ,. X "PS!

IB •=; t3n ~- Q o>« = fN tu ^£ g ? g>11 1 1 ~O 3 •-3 £

S to -oS ™ a> u.C C =J "_ o a o> -J5

"w o S p '"'S.O < fcn£s El en £ g g"— ' 0) CO ,ffl 5 OQc2 ,, =H E -2 • _f Si I5SD

fg w "S BCO ^^ C -•sr i g S '««,! i S i.£• o s eg 0 < fcacnU "O mU> 0 JC .~= £ c o>5 0) CO C~ 55<

i^I-.^Hf SilSo-,

rac

00 00 CO. 00 CO-i -> X -> X X -t -i X -J X

O O O ^ J O O O O ^ O O O

o o d do

CQ 03 03 03 CO-> -> X -i X X -f -t X -3 X

^d00 do "d d

CO 03 CQ- > — > — } — >^t ' CM CM ' ' CO ' CO '

" i tfi ~ i " i i "CO Tf CM f

03 03-3 -3

I CD i 1 t 1 1 1 CO 1 < <in co

-3i f * . t i i l l l ^ - l t l

co r--co

S59S8f5g8;8S8£

<u tu'o c n g> 5| 2 ||| | | e

2 1 § i 1 i 1 111||||||||l|||

03 CO 00 03 O3r- r- T - r - T - r - r-X X -j" -3 X X X -5 -3 " -) X 03 -j X -) 00 CQ

O t p C O ^ O O O C S C M ^ O i n C J O C j T ^ C M• . CO O • • . O O . O O . O O Oo o o o o o o

03 03 03 CQ 03x x -3" -s x x x -r-j" -> x m -3 x -i" co co

d d ^ " d d d r-r^o-co Q *-•<-

03 03-5 03-3 -i" m ca

1 1 ' ' ' c o ' c o M - ' T j - T - mCO v- <—

i i i 1 * .•*.-' w i- £!T— CO CM " *& T—

03 03 CO-3 ~> —>—)

i I ^ - C M I 1 I » C O O ) ' ' ' ' ' ' 'CD CO T- Is-CM

-3 —>

l l ^ l l l l i C n c M 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1- co inV-

o to o in

S S fi Sca to Q) o n

| t» 1 1 1 1 |i li s ii s.§! is 0,8i |P||| ||g2 || .IfI l l g g l l l |tt S i < § x^x

0>

JlCOT-

wT"

iotuS"o§

^

1 Surrogate Re

coveries

i1 ,

2-Dichloroethane-d4

S S

,D~ JOCO COCM O

14-BromofIuorobenzene

Toluene-d8

•E » a Su S <o a.

iiiiE s ra

m -i X

3-15

AR3U66I

Page 31: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

voCs

1"«e<u

CU•oeoU

.eH

CD"mtncCDIOO

•JJ-

5.caccaE52.ca_cSH

*3TCO

"5ctoc8IcI

CACOD)

SCO

"c=1o

OJ

COE5

1'S

3COCO

15

1s

Oi_jSI3

COca£1g<

2

§

COCO

39<

|

ic£

S"

c3

£

»CD'Sicoco

1(/]to0)E

•zCOca

E

1COCO0)E

ccam

|— 1

*p*

O

1

1

J3•*

"3

1

1

m

1

1

1

ICO

ca ca

o

p COd CM

CQ ca-3" -i"13

CQ-3"

*

n

CQ

CM

1 r^

co o

1 Benzene

2-Butanone

CQ CQ CQ-» -3" -3 X -3" -3"

CM CO 1* CM Q3 1 - Oo in o o o o ind CM d d °. d do

m ^_ eo co-3 -i -i X -> ->

^£ o

CO CO—> -3-3 -5

T- CO CM T- ' •*T-

' °> 5 ' ' N

CO-a"

CO

•~-i, , , . , , g

r—

h.o <o co r-> co o coT"

0

| 0) ll|C "m Tn S

ca .c .c CM *- QJ 750 0 0 »-- T-' 1= 1=

X -3 X ->

o o o oP CD 0. 00 0

X -> X ->

d 6

-3 -3

1 CO ' CM

• • 5 •

'

i > i i

° CO <1 i?

C§ ira £

1,1,1-

Trichl

oroett

Trichloroethene

Vinyl Ch

loride

Bromodichlorome

T-03 ,_,_,_ ca^_ _x -i" -3 x x x co -3~xca-3XcQcQCQCD CM CM O> O3 CD T— h CD O> CM in O> T~ in *""O C D i n O O O - ^ C O ' C O ' O O ^ r C D -°. •+ d °. °. °. *i r °. d °. d d0 0 0 0 0 0

r-m T-T-T- m T- T-X-3"-jXXXCQ - i " X c o - > X m c Q C QT3 T J T J " O T 3 - O T3 "O •& •& T3 13 V

0 In 0 C3 O W T- X l«- o'CMCOCD*— f/3 ^ ™* '"' 5— ™ *

CQ CQ -3 CQ CO CO1 III ^ ^ 1 Q {Q 1 (*J » Q

CO N. CM CO CD"

. , I CO CO .'-.-'CMCog1 ' ' ' T - T - ' e O ' c M f < O °

ca m

i ^ 0 l i i i i ^ . l i i i l l iin ir r-CO T-

—> —>O CD f^CM

g c O f O O c o o o e o c o C M c o c o e o C M C M g™j:co-<rin-»cD^cD^co<*cB^^^J

£ C CD ° £

illillhli li.eiilillgillflilitfSS3§§sS5liS' llil?

aO)o>

CD

^ ~U3CM1J-

1

3"og

g

1?g i

1 Surrogate Reco

1,2-Dichloroethai

o£>"

8T-

«r-CM^

iCD2

|4-Bromofluorobe

S

S

§P

Sn f ll"§loC||gs&fitss"!S " -i 11 | i— **• MS <^ 5 £ *-B C ° 2 -n J3

g^la^lla xi o •DO

3-

R3U662

Page 32: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

so"

<BraS<a•ac0O

'coT5craECO.m_c£

.2SP

1COcrao(0™

§

^

.£5

COrara

135

|o^

CDraCO

oO

-g£O

0)

8c0T3C

<3

*o

1

^c5C8

_,

1D)

'53

COrat:o1

T3

ICD5

§"£>ffs

COm"c

F"<

•g£Ico'o.2cuO

0 ?

=? •§11<j!ioiro

1.3 ,—.CO O)

il "

11m

<B

"p O)

• U ^^"-J

T3

W CDro cflj **—*

E

• _c 5>ra ,CO

Hp

m

m-3"mOd

m-5"aCO

m-3"CO

—3CO

1

CO10

gssCQ

CQ-3"

,_in

CD—i

toO5

m-3

inen*—

C«3Oin

S

g

1

X

enSd

X

10Q

(

,

1

S

cu

1i

CQ CQ CQ CD CO CQH'XX-i'-sX-jXXXS'-jXXX-jCQ-J-Xcn-i-jCQOQaj

< D C 3 c n o > i ^ c v 3 c n i n c n o ) c n N T f c n c 3 ) c 3 J i n T - ^ f c n c o i O 5 f T - ' c t - r ^C O C D O O O C O O C S O O O C O i n O O O C S c N ^ O ^ C D ^ ^ C M C O

do d odd odd *~d ^~ °,°

QQ CQ CQ OQ CQ CQ-j'xx-i'-T'x-jXXX-j-sXXX-s'm-i'xm-j-jmmcQ

< o c N i o i O ' c a > t o c o i n i o i o c o c M i o i o i o c o c M C M i o i o c o c M i ^ M - ' < -co dd ^"d d d d ^ ^ d d d ^"""0 T~ VCN

CQ CQ CQ—3 — > — > -) CD tO -3 CQ OQ CO

co CM ' ' ' c o 1 1 1 ' ' ' co CM 'in co r^^-T-CO T- tf t- CM

o"'.."' , . ~ 5 . , . . . i n i o ,•*. coooSiT = - f l - ' ' c N •* ' ' ' r- T- ' C O 1 -5-CO^:

CQ CQ CQ-3" -3-3 -I -3

i i i t i Q > l l l ' l C O C N ' ' l l ' C M ' l ' C M > ' 1- 00 •» T- T-

CN »- T-

- 3 - 3 - 3

i i i i i t n | | ' | ' i n ' | ' | | c o o o | ' l l t | 1? S 5^

^ S l S c N S S S S ^ g ^ S C M C O C N C g J o l ^ O C o g S g

g g 0 l 1 l l « l l1 1^1 llll Jllllis^I S^ gl

ssSoCM

o1ffi?o

1

s?

1Ii1§CO

g

co*~

*

1ret5sosa

CO00

•D

CM

enzene

XIso

2CQ4

•oooCO

•oenCO

ooV

(Tolue

ne-

a)

E w ra(0 T3 .S

XQ ffi1IO ZJ— \J

_ ni ..

J\1*«C

(U"eg09

U•oo

"*"••- ~* ^

^j g8.i«.

ISra w

n l"fl « i11 II r- ~03 -j X ='

°°<O

O«=

i>-'o CM

: Bi m cu

S fj c < CD raS t I | I |CO .O O 1_ £1 3O O O OTCO A O T)

3-17

3 IU663

Page 33: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

If)es

IW5<uKen

e

en

75e

•aeeeCMa

Hen

'SeeEEsCX2

i•

CUIE

i_ g oIS 8iC J— CO D)O CO CO en —

Q."

E i iCV)

I

CO c D>CO •=- 3OJ •—

d oi§*e 2 c s>O COO D*

CO CMX Xco co co co CM ^cox ^.p^ m ^ x x ^ x c Q c o x x c o m r n X m ^cocom

->" -3" x x -3 -i" x -3" co" x -> -i" -s -3" -3" -3" -> -3" -3" of -f co x -s" -3" -fi **(}" 10 j* * r » co 10 *<t* co 10 to T 10 j* 10 to to co 10 10 t* 10 10 t* w 10 to toe O c 3 c p c D O O O C D c 3 t D O C D < D O O O O O O C ^ O t ^ t ^ < ^ O O O O OLl!jLULUUJLl!jlJUu!jUJLUl^u!jLUu!lu!jljULj!jLjULi!lLUL^

r ** r <& lo^^oitd^ *- CO 00

CO CMsx vCO C O < * 2 C O - - C O C N «*5

CQX ^^ C Q ^ X X ^ X C Q m X X C Q C Q C Q X c Q ^ C Q C Q C Q-S" -9" X X -s -> X -> m" X -f -f - -> -> -S" -» -3 -> m" -»" CQ X ->" -a" ->

CD IDI I 888

U J U J L I J I J J L 1 1 U J U J I J J U J U J U J I I J U J U J U J I J J L I 1 I J J L L 1 U J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J

CMtri Co-*— t~ W i r i i n T - ^ - T-

CO CM_ X X —CO C O f O C O - . C O C M f3fflx _ „ m ^ x x ^ x m m x x c o c o m X m m m m c o_. u x ^ .y* XN IJJ " J *"N X> "J i*J uj r u

x x -3 -» x -3" co x -i" -3" -3 -3" -3" -3" -3" -i" -> of -3~ mcoS C D O J C M C O C M C O C O t i n c O C M O C O C M C D C M e O C O C M h - i n C D C O i n O C Of« CD ~ j CM * o T~ oo oj ^ co m co Is* CD CM in * i oo Is* co co CM co CD

CD CD CD CD O CD CD

^_ x nco c o c o c o CD m mX -3 CO -j" CO -> X -» -3 -3 -s" tD -3" CO -i" CO -3" -3" -i"u u o u u u o u u o o

..O . O « T - P C M O . O P O . . O T— .OOOp p p p p p p p

CQ CQ CD CQ CD CD CQ CD CD DQ-)" -» X -3" X X -3" -3" X -i X X X -i -> X X X -> -i -i X CQ -i X -3" CO CO

,_:oooc>Troo. oooco.'toooocM,-: h* O> N- C3>p p o ^ p o o p T t - o o o c a o c O T r e o o o c J C M ^ j o i n o o p v - c NCD ^ c b C ) ^ - c i ~ c 3 P C > " ~ c > o e 3 0 0 d ° ° p ° ° °

Q) CO

" 5 I * -. g 2I 1 .11 S& fi£

i ""<u ~co

oil III ll|l |isi 1 s « s f • la ..lg I |JJ| |||l IpHll I-4 fj.ifc c .Q .2 •§ •§ E »|E § o "§ "§ g c § | g <5 § .SB .g" g § - jc? X_ .s -T _

o >• 5> 5- SEl*. fejS

I

3-18

flR3U66l4

Page 34: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

soe

1•*•»"3V

• m*CA

e

I<u•o

513eI

%£03E

CU3

= -5; 5p 83||HH1

10 g CftCO •& 3O) "~*

lSt:o co -SO co

co

CM C (O CN f\|

-3" x x -3" -» x -3" m" ->" -» -3 m" x x -3" -3" -> x x -3" -3" -»O c 5 i S c S c S c B c 3 c S c S c 5 c S c 5 c S c S c S c S c S c S o O c S o O c S o O o S oU J U J I l l l l l U J I l l L J J U J U J U J L U U J U J U J U J U J I l l l i L U l l J U J U J U J L U U J U J I J J U J U J0 co ~ in oo3 CD t O)

: "". co W°?Tl!M:ts;'^:in. co'WPr^o'co'00. co'^m'^t'co'cn °?to.cor-:coc^'ii:Pc M ^ - c o m T - T - T - C O T- T - c o r o

CM fj co fN CM

-3" x x -3" -i X -i m" -3" -3" -3 m" x x -3" -3" -f x xco in co inco in co in in h~ f9999999U J L U U J U J t l J U J U J l l J l U L l . l i U U J U J l i J U J U J L U l J J U J U J U J l J J U J l U U J U . I U J U . l U J

O C M C M O I ^ C M - - - - - . - _ . . - . - . . . . . . - . - - - .in.iri'^tNO>_):rjco_;-.r:cNrt:cpIS;ir:,r;_; •tpUCO

in ' . 'T u; xj- CM ''. en co vi •* *H h- m oo •<- . <-! « T- rr l>i wc o i n T j - t ^ f — T— C M ^ - CMCM •'a-

CM CO jvj CM , CMm _ ~ m m ^ x x x m x m m x _ « m m mxS

m rt^ 0 OT3" X -i Cd -> -> -3 CD X X -> ->" -J" X X

Mu>o'^r*"dPdT^9d9cNid^dcic)90CNJcvic)T"d'^d'r-:o o o o o o

CM*tt<> ^ x ^_ m x co" m m m2 <j o "E" "> ~> X -3 -3" co -3 m m x -3 m -3 -f -3 -3"-3"-3"

coi--T-f..i--.cov;r--oinf-cMi--t--'-c o o o i n c M c o o c O T - o > c o o i v » C M ^ ' ' ~<*>,xi(-if»!»JOO,-;1-!Q,jo ,.:«-»«-!NocMh-:<-:<-!c30'Ho0.cMddcvi0.oPdddc>>tl: •*o o o o o o o o o

£Q CD m co m m ' CQ-> -j -j -> -» x -> -» x '-» x -» x ->~ -> x x x to -s'xm-sxmmm

T- CMCO O S S

OCMOCNiOC)c!00'-!oc!o'-!'<iO'-!c!HCMT-I-< O M O Oo ooo ooo o o

a > o £ g | | ! : l o o g : g o g gIlilliSii^jSHreu <B esEEcMt-'S'ST-.gc g g gmcMOOOi-"'T-~i-i-T-i-i>cQcnca

^ ° g •§ 35I d. S I f

CO T3 .Eo)

ro 3 2t

3 « —&

S cu •g

tiif «i j§5 CO 3 3

JillS S

11 II T- CM COm -> x X X

3-19

AR3U665

Page 35: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

j"3

4)•*•»03

«•ocoUT3ecefi.2HHon§<*-oEs

N .2 P TP li:O 03 —'.

Q." .

•ass^/ ro <+**> CO

aj • ^

1 § 3" I1 Si!1(J O)

co cs J " 3 c o .COCM J5cox ^xoaca,,, x OT x ca C Q X X C Q oa^x cameo—3 ~> x ~> -3" -3" X -> co" x -f —3" -3 -j -j -3 -3" CQ -j x co" CQ -3 -i -j —3

o o m o o i — < o i n t c o « 3 c D o i n o m c o i n < £ > t n i n i - o i n i n o 100tiiiij9iiitii9999999iii9aj9999999iij99i3>n9uiT f C D t l j T - o l i J i i l U J U J L l J U J l J L I o U J c o U J l L l l L l l l l U J L l J L I J o l L l L i J ^ O t J J i n

_ O> COt- CM CO C33

CO CM J 5 < O - C O C M JOCQX ^.XCQCQpj X_CTXCQ C Q X X C Q "ECO*. CQCQCQ

o o c ^ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c p o o o o o o o o oUJlJULUIj!juIjuIjuIjuljliLUliu!ju!lL6liJlLuIju!ju!juIju!lliIlLLlJLULLILLILLIliJ

io'" T ~ T ~ C M C O *" CM -r

CMX '

CO CM f ? C O - C O C M JOtnx ^xcaoap, X ^ X C Q m x x c o ca^X CQCQCQ-3" -3" x -3" -3" -3" x -3 CQ" x -> -> -3 -3 -i -> -3" CQ -3" x CQ" CQ -3 -3" -3" -3"

COO ^ 0' 0' ° 0-°o-p>IO(Y'00-0c;c>0 d° ^ *~

COco^ _ m c a x c a c a c a c Q m

-3-3 X-31CQ CO -5-3 —3 —3 -^ -3 CO —3 ~3 CQ -3—3—3o u u u u u u o o o u u o

c!?3S

O T - C D H H C ) H S ^ C M O O O ^ O H O ^ . ^0^^000O O O O O O O O O O O

CD GQ CQ CD CO CQ CQ CQ-3"-fX - 3 X X - 5 - 3 X - » X X X - 3 - 3 X X X - 3 " C Q - 3 " X C Q - 5 - o C Q m m

o i o o c o o o o o < o o o o o o c p t o o o o o o j ^ o i s - - o ^ r Q C \ i c oO C^ ^ C^ O . ^ O O . CD ^ ^ . CO (O ^ . ^ C3 O T™ ^ O O T— O <O

O O O O O O O OOO O

" Im *-.CD•c q> <u „, ro £ £ c £ g

i § g g £ g < u g ^ S l e•«?CD S^"0 < » C U fc CD'S ^S °H 6c ^^^ Scfl)° c ^ m 2 S m ECD P

133 1O * —=0. Q S ro

ro aiJ3 *=.isilj_i _* •*- .J3 j—

l^^-sf_ ^ m N? .«

|£ Ci

roro<u.5x Q 8"sai « g£ S Q

zJ I -5 f §Ilfii•g gj" CQ CO CA

I i 111<Dtill!5!>>^r" II ^" II CM COm -> x x x

3-20

AR3U666

Page 36: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.3-10A. VOST Average Emission Rates in g/sec

Benzene2-ButanoneCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-DichloroetheneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideChloroethaneDibromochloromethanet-1 ,2-DichloroetheneEthylbenzene2-HexanoneMethylene Chloride4-Methyl-2-PentanoneStyreneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl Acetateo-Xylenem-/p-XyleneTotal Xylene

Run 5EmissionRate8(g/sec)

2.97E-035.91 E-05 J, B5.4E-06 J, X33.6E-056.06E-051.19E-07X14.3E-07 X22.2E-06 J1.6E-05 J, B1.07E-06X31.4E-06 J, X38.5E-07 B, X31.97E-05 X34.2E-06 J, X35.57E-05 J, B, X35.8E-06 J3.2E-07 J, B, X27.6E-06 J, X32E-07 J, X2

2.3E-06 J, B5.3E-06 J, B2.2E-05 J, B5.84E-06 B, X37.5E-06 J, B1.85E-05 B4.66E-06 X32.5E-06 J, B8.0E-06 J, B1.05E-05 J, B

Run 6EmissionRate8(g/sec)

3.77E-035.59E-05 J, B5.2E-064.72E-057.29E-051.97E-07X14.2E-07 X22.4E-06 J, B1.38E-05 J, B9.2E-07 X31.2E-06 J,X28.0E-07 B, X32.27E-054.7E-06 J, X34.65E-05 J, B7.3E-06 J5.2E-07 B, X28.1E-06 X31.2E-07X12E-06 J, B

2.43E-052.02E-05 J, B3.9E-06 J, X21.3E-05X34.8E-064.26E-06 X35.7E-06 J, B1.14E-05 J,B1.8E-05 J, B

Run 7EmissionRate8(g/sec)

3.45E-037.00E-05 J, B6.1E-06 J.X34.29E-056.42E-051.2E-07X13.7E-07 J, X22.6E-06 J, B1.6E-05 J,B9.1E-07X31.3E-06 J6.6E-07 B, X32.02E-05 X35.4E-06 J, X33.82E-05 J, B7.0E-06 J3.0E-07 J, B, X27.6E-06 J, X31.3E-07 J.X22.2E-06 J, B5.0E-06 B2.1 E-05 J, B2.52E-06 X38.7E-06 B, X34.4E-06 B1.94E-05 J

3E-06 J, B8.7E-06 J, B1.22E-05 J, B

AverageEmissionRate(g/sec)3.40E-036.17E-055.6E-064.2E-056.59E-051.5E-074.1E-072.4E-061.5E-059.7E-071.3E-067.7E-072.09E-054.8E-064.68E-056.7E-063.8E-077.8E-061.5E-072.2E-061.2E-052.1 E-054.09E-069.7E-069.2E-069.44E-063.7E-069.4E-061.4E-05

a From Tables 3.3-7 through 3.3-9.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).X2 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent >20% of the total.X3 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent <20% of the total.X4 Indicates that the value includes ND and J values that represent <20% of the total.

3-21

AR3U667

Page 37: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.3-10B. VOST Average Emission Rates in Ib/hr

Benzene2-ButanoneCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform1 ,2-Dich!oroethane1,1-DichloroetheneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideChloroethaneDibromochloromethanet-1 ,2-DichIoroetheneEthylbenzene2-HexanoneMethylene Chloride4-Methyl-2-PentanoneStyreneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl Acetateo-Xylenem-/p-XyleneTotal Xylene

Run5EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

2.35E-024.69E-04 J, B4.3E-05 J, X32.8E-044.81 E-049.48E-07 X13.4E-06 X21.7E-05 J1.3E-04 J, B8.53E-06 X31.1E-05 J.X36.7E-06 B, X31.56E-04X33.3E-05 J, X34.42E-04 J, B, X34.6E-05 J2.5E-06 J, B, X26.0E-05 J, X32E-06 J, X2

1.8E-05 J,B4.2E-05 J, B1.7E-04 J, B4.64E-05 B, X35.9E-05 J, B1.47E-04 B3.70E-05 X32.0E-05 J, B6.3E-05 J, B8.37E-05 J, B

Run 6EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

2.99E-024.43E-04 J, B4.1E-053.75E-045.78E-041.56E-06X13.4E-06 X21.9E-05 J,B1.09E-04 J, B7.3E-06 X39.4E-06 J, X26.3E-06 B, X31.80E-043.7E-05 J, X33.69E-04 J, B5.8E-05 J4.1E-06 B,X26.4E-05 X39.4E-07 X12E-05 J, B

1.93E-041.60E-04 J, B3.1E-05 J,X21.0E-04X33.8E-053.38E-05 X34.5E-05 J, B9.05E-05 J, B1.4E-04 J, B

Run 7EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

2.74E-025.56E-04 J, B4.9E-05 J, X33.41 E-045.10E-049.6E-07 X13.0E-06 J, X22.1E-05 J, B1.3E-04 J, B7.3E-06 X31.0E-05 J5.3E-06 B, X31.60E-04X34.3E-05 J, X33.03E-04 J, B5.6E-05 J2.4E-06 J, B, X26.1E-05 J,X31.0E-06 J, X21.8E-05 J.B4.0E-05 B1.7E-04 J,B2.00E-05 X36.9E-05 B, X33.5E-05 B1.54E-04 J2E-05 J, B

6.9E-05 J, B9.65E-05 J, B

AverageEmissionRate(Ib/hr)2.69E-024.89E-044.4E-053.3E-045.23E-041.2E-063.3E-061.9E-051.2E-047.7E-061.0E-056.1E-061.65E-043.8E-053.71 E-045.3E-053.0E-066.2E-051.3E-061.9E-059.2E-051.7E-043.2E-057.6E-057.3E-057.49E-052.8E-057.4E-051.1 E-04

a From Tables 3.3-7 through 3.3-9.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).X2 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent >20% of the total.X3 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent <20% of the total.X4 Indicates that the value includes ND and J values that represent <20% of the total.

3-22

AR3U668

Page 38: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

J!"E,

a.£HC/)0£>•^e2HCMO

ee£Wl

1hJ^•t*

5>^ *e•S Jx-v tfg>**'•ocSeQ.SeU•ac• ••"cTS

1

»— 1•

4)SH

inCOO)

o*sw

"55_c_"cDO^*•o53roEto01

ra O

8~D>C_

I

__ V^

2 c.CD COU- m

•D«

Tentatively

Identi

fioCO5D)•2-

£2'coCL•—z"

t_"coQ.

co'roQ.

CM1-&'coQ.

'coQ.

ICompound (TIC)

NN-mT-

CMCM

00CM

(

m"*

0)

^"CDc:CO"3i

etanone (

g

"S3S

NN CQ"O CDCD Is-CD O

CQCM O)T- in10

eo CQ?8

3 .*~

CDT- 1

2 •

f\.ti *jj

"ro

I?0.0CM O

Butenal (2-methyl

Branched

alkane,

N NT- C33Is- 00CM 0

O 0)T- CDCM

1 £

•* inIs- T-

in t-CD T-

T- Or«- co

Bromobenzene

Silane, m/z 281

N

inOO

CM

C35

05T~

CDCM

1

CDT3>»

CD•acoN5CQ

NN CQ"O COm co<* -

CQC3) CO•«fr OCO T-

„ CQSOD

co*CM

CO05 CM

ff\1 ~jf

lodobenzene

Undecane

Nin0

ooin

0)

co

CMT~

O)

s-CDCM

Unknown, m/z 73,

CD3

5^

_toCO.c

inr-~CO15£O)o.52oTo>IBjwCOCOE15.EtoCD

8TJ_C

CQ

|—

I•oCMtoh-U)CO

volume w

CDQ.

COintnCOO)

COCO

1151CO.§•0)

"OCO

V

CD•o'>,~w_>3s1>,c0v>CO"c3

8.EouCO

£t?oSN

3-23

AR3U669

Page 39: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

u

rt

rt j^'o^cocDincDcqcM. CD^fcopcoin ojft og-ftjS^co'cDdcMdciT^t'oc) 2 _" ro R ™ C3) £9 a-fep lc

CO CO.c _,S1I ItJ2 ^ E'S

' S cSp-l

^> £ e -s

E

58 >- *fro ro O tD) • Ov- o cr M"o £- "o.2 8 c?!?co "--3.

in

||

u.'roQ.

"0$cizr co

1 !•g CM

| "5.5 n.2

"'ro0_

"35 § 'Sin m °-

•gIE:tz o"CO 2 t>»-o

11S |§ oP 0

NN N N CO NCO TJ- O T- COCO in CD CO CM•* CO CO O CM

CO

rj CM m v-

S 5 CO • ^

, « CM I °' CM £i ' CO

i CO S , O51 in £; in

CM m1 in 52 CM '

' ' ' CM '

C "0)13•9 «=•CM CO0) 0> ?c Q.Qo o VC Q.O

fcjjo9 -C C fl5

c 21 £ Ji g

1 1 i 1 1JE •*. = E 8

N NN CQ" N N CD" NCO CO T- O CO T-CD •<* co o CD inO O t- O O

CO CO

t- CO

CM ,Sfcgo>

T~ co CM r CD ^T~ ~

CQ CQCM t-- O . T—T- T- CM N- CM T-

|s. CQ |s. m oT- o, CM CO CM -

i J2 • ' 0> •

N.CMco"_ is.

CM "D CD "r\ f~ C•t! -c CD a) -

CD c "ro S ° oc ro N -9 co cro " c o -o x.= o> <i> c cCO O CQ S O

W> "" m => »V -ti OT «.i • _ CD . co "ro'J3> ro

Ife I? g- — ro o

0) Q.E E"ro 8£ ro•„• * fl s oi

y I.cMCJCQ.^CQ,s.Is.CQci S 8

K•oSoB" .Si JO "• • • • CM ' ' T^ ' " *•" ' {0C LI- CQ cuO £UT3IS ••- -oB *

2 CM CO

ic 5. ° l>° ~^ T-I ro i ~ co

C

H "c f*T 9 £: ? -. _ 1s- "p.«s -5Kc^?J^SS -S m '-S |

U)CO

JoSCOro

3-24

AR3IU670

Page 40: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Q.

«C/Jfi.

H2&O

•2 1?O D- CO r- in CM CM t-

&2H® • i i i „ >

V£ =e sVI

oe.oU.-ga•-S

«•*->SS(O

£

enro <o o tl *** l -55"^ Ol- ^--.,^->— ^, ,,,,_^i ---......-.'.' , . -gos 8 g I)CO

o o

1CD

^m

coa.

CO

roQ.

CML.'coD.

CDQ.

2•CD n) CDLL m °-

ly Ide

nid (TIC

ntativ

elTe Co

N N N N N O f N N f l f N N

lOt-CDCOOO COT-OO

m m

3 01CO '> re"S ~£ T3

I §CD o<D Q.E E"re 8£ coS SS 811

, . C O Ne

0)

I£Sl2O 0)<= S-o 2m 9-0 X -i

c a>T30)

S S

ITO "

m^J2 co«•* T3

.2CD >m <=

2•i2CO£•T3CO03

§?a.coca%O)•gSSCOco

3-25

/IR3U67I

Page 41: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

V)a3WenM"3.EesC/3G,2HHOjaM

•43HMri

4

1O)PMCACUDIDb.«

^a§£

rfi_^r<u•**caH

c.gtn1111

_g2•*-•cCDoc0OCOCOD5-6COCO

uCD2

If1"01-2-03"cv—"

*cr.E

•"?>

.CO

3

"coCO

15E?COf—

(D

oH-

•occEC

8111nCOCN

oil

CM

oo35CM

aaN£cc

N

99LLJ 111CM 00CM N-in •*

N

in m9 9ill LUf* . {to ( 5co co

inoCD

N

OCDCD

*— .COcCOa.e?fE Er|C L_<D O

m 6

N ^>

•* •*9 9LLJ HICD Oin T—CO CO

N -3

in in9 9UJ LLJ

•sf CO

-3COC5co

N

oin•*

C CDN CS |o •*•"D CCQ /v

coN X

•* •*99LU HI" CDv- N.CM T-

N^

in in0 0LULU3 CMfv. f\l

CM CM

COXCO

CN

NT_N;CM

03 fl«Q) rt

0 C

O CP"* £3

ca d

CQ

999111 LU LUCM CD "h in t~

T-

min in in999LU LU LU

CNi

COCO N- 0)

cJ T •«-

0} 0)c cIIO 03

0) ~™ CC* O O

N 1 §5 .y 5f "U —

— 6 ca f

Nisj CQ N

O O C3 CD OUJ 111 LU LU LUr in in t*- N-^ ^ o> co oo

NN CD" Nin in in in in90 o o oi i i iHI 111 LU LU LU

V- T—

CM T-;

NN CQ" N( CO T-in co ,j• T~

^*coc"3J2

&<DCo-<D ^

9 1

5 U ^T 05 05 »C05 C C 0)P— CO 05 05 T\ 05 ~ 05 PV

5 D S i^ a

NN CQ CQ" -3 N

in in m in in0 0 0 O 0LU LU LU LU LUC CM j O5 O5*» CO CD tO IO

NN CQ CQ" -3 N

CO CO CD CO COo o o o o1 1 1 1 1111 LU LU LU LLJO5 O5 CD LO ''ij"oo I*** r*"" r * r***

CQ -3O) in0 O

NN CQ" NO) CD tOOD r *o o o

t*vrl:,

o „.i CDO C 1*"o | 8

5 „ 1 1 N* N C CO "F"p & ~o o c£0,-X -g E 1m "^ c ° -§K l^ CQ D 5

1CD "t

"5 £> M-

C . go

•D- O CM00. V£ co •£05 £ COC ^ COM — o._ CO <Din ja c™ !Q £tl -J w03 Q CO

£ a> c §21- oQ0 CO Q-Zc o E to.W O CO

3 co" 0 "oCO 3 «= C

ro 'c '«

ll = lsli^ill!*- CO •*- (0</5 w <O )

Sen co O t> "Q

"O "5 3 C•- ~ •- coCQ -5 N X

c'EC(Jw•

wi^^2« t*5' o nss« 1CQ CO CO Sh- H a> SE E-g Iess iU-U-CO . |CO J3 O d

3-26

Page 42: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

voa3KiV*JU"Sr

iaesHL_,rCOOg

•DG•«•*-*-»

S•oMCA^

VPMW3O)feDI.

t

a1H

m °V)1

r )fliISc:H

c.2 o8 S"P 5UJ

co*-* '"""ss 1s -s1 !>o .3.0 to oCO *-?2to CO

.--.

§:=:::'

«JJ-a>S

ja.0

"coCO*-*0)

1

reoH

CompoundN N N N -t N N

boocpoooooooJ J L U L L J L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U33ininincMCD*i3'r'v-fs-^i~cNo>r^T—cDT— N- CM f^ t*- S- oCNinincococMCMt-t-T-x-

N N N N -3 N N

cominininininininininoooooooooooJ J L U L U L L J L U L U L U L U L U L U L U^-mosocococMcocoooo'**• ^ "*!|* ^ O " 00 ^ C C CCOS-CD'st-COCOCMCMCMCM'r-

—3co t~- r - r- s-» CO CO CM CM00 t csi c\i c\i

N N N N N N

o oo o -* co T-CD CD O in Csl COCD TT co CM' -r-1

C""CD

33-. £1CO CNI,CD CDO- Cg 0 0

5" 1 §^ o> £I* ? .?„:fc * 03 CDCD £ CM c P C CDp C < D - J - Sofl5T3

r - V S c ^ o R — N > »c c M £ a > 5 c c - g c i :<D Q • — • C D N c D O C D . S i C p C DOS'S"? 2 o>.i ro€Eo-Slc5§§-§9 = o E E «SZsE-g^13?^ S2 §CQOOQOJSrfCNlOOQOQCQ

O OUJLJJO COr»- CD

CD CDo oUJUJO) OCO 00

0 T-cn oocJ d

0)CO

•so

Toluene

Dibromochlor

NCO

in9UJCD

NCQ"CDOLLJO00

NCO

COd

.ooo<D"CO

1

N CQ

in ino oLLJUJin in

N CQ

CD CDo oUJUJf*— Is*-CD CD

m00CDd

N

ooCDd

CO

If

N03

in9UJTJ-

NCQ"CDOLLJCMCD

NCQ"coCDd

05CD

inoi*

CD9LUinin

CD

d

0)

Q

O

CD

in9LU4.

cooUJoin

,_ind

CD32Q

ococu

CO

9UJo~

CDOUJoin

N

ind

N.CDCMco"1 -N

Unknown, m/

JSo3 CDco £> o

So CMCD Q- V£ a> •£co £ CDg 5 S•B £ o.,_, CD CDm .Q cro "3 "pf- O £^

tH — 1 CO0 D CDi?il03£ 3 njj •* O LJO 03 CLZC O E CO03 0 CDCD ™ "§^ CD" ~® -oCO 3 «=' C

•° > 1 i£ -o -S —3 03 — §03 ro fflE S|« 1 S TOS c- 5 £.C t- CD•« co *-• to£111.3 S 3 :§IIISDO N X

cEEyT3oO)in03

CM' . &TCM £m n coco § a03 O 5= <sJ3 J3 03 ACO CO CO !J1- 1- » SC C -^ 1fc fc O J

LL it CO <CO -Q 0 S

3-27

Page 43: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

^

n904CA«"E,gRC/DD,03

HH00•dOJ

Identifi

en«cuCM-w

I*•«iTacuH^

VOr- 1l

**5—

CQH

coCOCOELU

C

icentr

atio

ooCOCOD)

OCOV)

o0)2

oCOT3cn3"o

Sc1 — '

*O

•jj>CDCOa>

aS"cocCO

"CD

1

TO

Oh-

Compound

N

? 9 9LLJ LU LLJ** LO COCM m in

N

999LU LU LUO CO O5* J" O3 COCO CD CD

CO CD• - coC" CD

N

COcnCD

, — ,

cCDQ.8Q.

c.

Benzene

Butenal (2-meth\

Chloroform

N CQN -3 N N N ca" N CQ -3" N

999999999999L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L L I U Jco co h""- ^ 3 c co c t**1" C3 r 3CO IO O) p CD to * 3 f*\ f*\ ff\ tn" CO C I C ™ ™ ™ ™"

*

N CON -3 N N N CO" N CQ -3 N

10 to 10 10 to to to to to to co coCO C2 CO f** ^ ^ ^ *"" f**fr £2 c ^L U l i l L U L L J U J L U U J L U L L J L U L U U J* 00 " ^ 00 ™ ^ T™ O5 C f f CO

in-*cococMT-T--^

CQ-i CQ -3"CO O T- O •*•* c> o> j oq•* CN T-' O

NN N N N CQ" N N

T- CO CD O CO CN CDT- r-- CM OO CM J N-iri co co T T d

^

CJB3JO1

CDCD Oco ro£ CDc5 x

CD ^ o ^ C M 0 «CO| § III Hg! |S2C I— o ^3 LO c CQ "O CD ^

CO Q^ O O O «— O T5 ^— ^ flC^ O O ii *n ?• Z3 50

CDLUoCD

CDOLUinK_

inN-CD

0}cCO£CD

Dibromochlorom

N N

in in0 0UILLJcn ooui in

N N

CD CDO Oi i111 LUin tIs" h

N N

in coN- rCD' CD

CDCMen

Dodecane

Unknown, m/

z 7:

CQ-»"inSCDin

CQ

CDoLU0K

CQ-3"

CD"O

Methylene Chlor

NCQ"in%min

NCQ"CDolil0[

NCQ"O)CDCD

Decane

CO3CO

C .

soCD CU£ CDCD ".E oin ci "=£ CD DTO S£ CD

"S CO

11_. COCD w2. 05

> "5T3 >

§^

S.1£ toCO

CO co2 <i>oS.S cCQ '-i

im Ta

ble 3.3-1 3

.im Ta

ble 3.3-3.

S SU. LL.CO JD

1CD

"ooV•f

S£a.£"cojrCOCD

IIE coO CDo -aCD "0

"C CD

si"CD CD• *jc f-

idicates te

indicates 1

.« £f)

N X

cf

!oCO•oCOoCOcaTO

ick ga

s flow r

ate w

SCOU

Page 44: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.4 SVOCs Emissions Results

One of the sampling trains employed (MM5-SV) was used for determining emissions oftarget semivolatile organic compounds, and pesticides, and 20 largest peaks. GC/MS analysis forSVOCs was done full scan and SIM equivalent (i.e. high sensitivity). Analysis results for theSVOCs found in the MM5-SV samples are presented in Table 3.4-1. Table 3.4-1 includes SIMequivalent results whenever the analyte was not detected in the full scan analysis. Whenever ananalyte result was non-detect in the SIM equivalent analysis, a value of !/2 the detection limit wasused in calculating stack gas concentrations.

The concentration results shown in Table 3.4-1 were used to calculate the emission ratespresented in Table 3.4-2. Average emission rates for all 3 runs are presented in Tables 3.4-3Aand 3B.

Besides being analyzed for SVOCs, the MM5-SV extracts were also analyzed for pesticides.Those results are presented in Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-5, again using l/2 the detection limit for non-detects. The average pesticide emission rates are given in Tables 3.4-6A and 6B.

Recovery results for the surrogates spiked into the samples are included in Table 3.4-1. Allof the surrogate recoveries met the QA objective of 50-150%.

An XAD matrix spike of all SVOCs, except p-naphthylamine, was prepared and analyzedwith results shown in Table 3.4-7. A separate matrix spike of P-naphthylamine was alsoprepared, since the other compounds present in the spike mixture degraded the P-naphthylaminein the spiking mixture. That result is included in Table 3.4-7, which shows recovery of 36%.This is lower than the 50-150% recovery objective, but it is within the 25-100% range set byECC for anatysis of P-naphthylamine in solid matrices as shown in Section 3.10.

Most of the recoveries for the SVOCs were within the QA objective range of 50-150%.Recovery for 5 of the 59 compounds, including P-naphthylamine, was below 50%, as shownbelow:

P-naphthylamine 36%Pentachlorophenol 41%3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 33%

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.S3A 3-29

AR3U675

Page 45: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

2,4-Dinitrophenol 14%Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 29%

Although these are below the 50-150% objective, the recoveries for 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidineand Hexachlorocyclopentadiene are actually above the recovery values shown in Table 11 ofSW846-8270B. Thus, it can be stated that the majority of the compounds (95%) met therecovery objectives or met recoveries expected per Method 8270B.

A matrix spike of the pesticides and S VOC surrogates was also prepared, and those analysisresults are summarized in Table 3.4-8, with all recoveries meeting the QA objective of 50-150%.

The full scan analysis of the MM5-SV samples was also used to tentatively identify andsemiquantitate the SV-TICs in the 20 largest peaks. Those results and associated emission ratesare presented in Tables 3.4-9 through 3.4-12 where the 20 largest peaks includes target analytesand TICs. As expected, several of the TICs could not be specifically identified. It should benoted that the TICs are not necessarily the same between runs, and several of the TICs werepresent in the blank train in approximately the same amounts as in the sample trains, indicatingthat they are not being emitted from the stack. It should be noted that XAD is a synthetic organicresin which can degrade slightly during use. This degradation can result in organic compounds.One example of this is benzoic acid, which may be an XAD degradation product, as evidencedby the fact that benzoic acid was higher in the blank train than in two of the sample trains andover 85% of the amount in the third sample train.

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.S3A 3-30

AR3IU676

Page 46: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

i

4—H

h_I

IDC

I

01c3

. i_

§ f

TO JM 0)O) v- "p

•o g> 155 S

1

|<

TO £M 70O> ? 1O

"m ™ C55 S

1"c

ro £ o>O) T TJ"o P o2.E c

COCO 3

1"c3

<

c "32j *S"c .2 §

110 CT

|sS<2.

V.

1IffS0)

cS

^

I•o1SSO3

c

Full S

ea

11I

SS03

cC/3

1

CT111203

1"5u.

X X X X X X - j - a X X X C O X X X X X X X X X X X ^ X X t D X D O O J X X X X

O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O ^ O O O O O O O O O O O r - O ^ ^ O O O Oo' o o* o* o' o o* o o o* o d d d do d d o' d d d o d o o' d o' d d

CO-i -i to =» mco m T- o cov- If) O T- to

DDD^DDo. r D Z J D C M D D3 S D D S D D D D ^ D O 3^3333

m mCO CM Oiri ir $2

X X X X X X - 3 - » X X X C C t X X X X X - 9 X X X X X ? X X C Q X c a C Q X X X X

( O C D C D < O ( D C D ( D O J t D < D < D O O (D ( D C D f C O C O C O C D C O t D C D C O t D C O C D T - C O r - l O C S C D C D C Do o o o o o o o o o o o - o O O ^ O O Q - O O O O O O O O ^ - O o' o o o oo' d d d d d d d o* d o* d do do d d d d d d d d d d d o" o*

-5 —) CO - -J COCO CO O *tf" ^ <Otf CD OO T— fi tO

o o * d o " o *

m coCO 00 CO

3- -3 s

X X X X X X - j - j X X X C D X X X X ^ X X X X X X T X X m X O D C O X X - j X

o o o o o o o - o o o o o ' o o o ' ~ o o o o o o o o o o o i - o c s c ; o o c j Oo o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o

CQ ' CQ-> -> CQ " =1 m ->CM in CM oo r- CD cot in T- co r m CM

O^^OZdZ)10. 333CM 3 33 3*^333333^33 3 ^33 30 O O O O O

m m00 O) COv- O> COui « to

O T- T- CNJh- tO O tO^_3_3 = _3 = 3 = = -3,-:.3-3-3..3_j=3.3to_333.3.3.:3T-;3=3 ^ °3333

CO <Nto ,_

O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

d o' d o* o' d d d o' o" o" d d o" d d d d d d o* d o" d d d d o* o" d o" o" d d d

t

fl> 9i Q) "5S *m £~

f g l i III if i If Hi .g gl f|i ,|Ii|ll 1- "i 1 1 1 ™- g 1 • 1 1 g 1 I ^^^s^-wi^S Si-foils-'t5''to'S*2*cnf^^£ — *~" "5 w "c 'c y — ^ ^^•e^EflJ'Sj'ii^^Sc'ootSpo'*o''o'o^^2.Hm'5^£ -^ S§^'S'§gHpt7*7co"S'g'o''o'*oS)Lyja^S£Sy W ^ y ^ * a ) Q C l Q 5 § ro • ^ : ^ P c ' c l s ? * l | ' - " - S S £ 2 c ^ S Si* SL £? "fi <R S Sc a e o c Q c o o S ^ J c z l z i ^Izfiffct-^S-SllleaSeasSfflO^^ci.

AR3U677

Page 47: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

•aeuS

oU

<uSrtH

N.iOL

COc3

to

i

0 £

O g)m ?M *rfD) «— TJ•g g> os •§ eCO 3

1"c1<

ge8 a |ro Sj 15O> v- *P

co 3

1g1

!°|o> — *o"S c* g*S *(/)C/? 3

111

C Dit1|«„:= ,3

:p UJ

oi 55

•Eto

1*~

crUJ

CO

cSCO

S

«•__

1o

C7UJSCO

cc?£

m

"O"Js

•3

s55

§CO

£

CTUJEeo

1^

X X X X X C Q X C Q X ^ ? X X X X X C Q C Q X-^ -jX

*-T-T-*-t— C D * - ' O > T — ^-'T-V-T-T— T - C M C O ' ' * - C O T - C O T -O O O O O Q O Q'OQ O O O O O O'O'OO OOO O O O O O O O O O O O OO OO

CDCO — i CO CO ~a ~iS ^ " ^ " C O C O O >*«r f~ o h^ T—

3 => 3 3 =.-=> 3g.33333g^ 3 g 5 =

COSi fe fc sCO CO " CO

x x x x x c o x C Q X ^ X X X X X C Q C Q x-» -»x

o' o d d d o* o' d d o* o* d do* do

CDCD -o CD CO -n — 5co r-- *- o co CMo T- co r- en co

3 3 3 3 3 CJ 3 OXDODDD*0. W D1^ ^ 3o o o o

COIO O) f O><". N. ^ CJto to j- co

X X X X X C D X m x ™ x x x x x c o m x - > - > x

d d d o' d d o" o" d o* d o' odd o*

COCO CD -? CO CD "i ~ >

O to O) R T to tod o* d

s s 2to' to* co

i— r~- oo oo co o oh» CO *-; CO CO CD to

^3^33 o- 3 o* 3^33333 o-o-333^*33

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

1 i 1a> c <D "g a> 5 "o||1 1-2^-s^ =§§-g! lo

lllllllllll lllllllll 11J|||ltl|f|fl|||||ff||o||illw-llliiltiillllcilci?!!^

C O T - C O C O C M C O O C Oh- CO 1 * GO OO OO *~

S5fcS§SS2

Is- CO OO CO CO CO v*- CM

g "S5tesfe§s1Ij?o§g" »"C fl> "5> s « S1 1 liiHi1 llfllfflCO e\iQ-c!iT-";ZcNi«N(-

™ S fa" ? = 5 3!1|§11I*o cy Q) CD o)3 £2 ra 03 (0 nj111111Islili

lllllll

Q c o 3 ~ T - C N C O ^ T~ m -> x x x x

Ia

£ 3 3 I« I

.llllpj I s f S-a-s*o II

s e a s„ -O T> T3co co co oooi to f- eo° co co eo*I II II if•5 to co h-o c c cIsis.

ra3-32

Page 48: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

eo"8'iw•oeC3«e_ots

oU

co

111

raCO

II

£

uI

1CO

XXXXXX-5-jXXXm X XX X X X X X X X X ^ X X m X m m X X X X

UJIjJljJUJUJlllullLLJllJllJUJLlI UJ ulll^UJLLujLULLJUJlIlLLtUJLUUJLLJtllUJlJJLULLJLiJlIlLiJC N C N C N I C M C M C V I C O C O C M C N J C N C J } CM OIC\ICOCN,CMCM.CMC\1CMCN1CN. C^ICMCMC^IC^IC^J0>C^IC^^C^IC^^

ln CO t- T- i- Tfr

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O•••UJLlIUJLlJLlllllUJlllLIJllltJJ 111 UJlllUJLUUJLLJLLIllltilLlItlIu!]tilUJLLlLLJLLlLl!lLJJLLIlLlUJ

CO CO CO CD CO t"» CO CO CO CO CM CO CO CO CO CO CD CD CO CO CO CO CO IO CO CD IO CO 3 3" CO CO CO COCQ^fT-V-t-CD t- T-T-t-t-T-t-T-T-T-T-t-CDt— t-T-t-'CttNT-T-tT-T-

XXXXXX-3-,XXXm X XX X X X X X X X X - 3 X X m X m m X X X X

— _. — -._. — . —_.-._.., m in tn CD m in u) m u> in in in in 10 in co in o ro in to in toT-T-T-T-T-T-CO^t-t-T-CD T- T-T-'T-T-T-T-t-t-T-T-CO^-^-^^-WCNt-t-t— T-o poopoooopOj-j p p p ^ p p p p p p p p p p p t - p ^ — i p p p p

d do d d d d d d d d d d d d ddo'd

XXXXXX-j-jXXXm X XX X X - 5 X X X X X ™ X X m X m m X X X X

88888888888S 8 88S88J J U J U J U J U J U J L L J U J U J L L I L U U J UJ U-lUJLIJIJLlLJJlJUU.lLUlIlU.JUJLJJLlJLIlU.lLlJUJLilUJIJJL^COCOCOCOCOCOCDT^COCOCOlO CO C^COT-C^C^CJC^COC^C^C^^COCO^-COO^OTCOCOCOCO^^^^^^f^^f^^i^:^ W TjT_'^:v:^:T:TjTj^TJ^:^:T-'TJTjvJco"r-*WT-*v^W

ocpooocpoooooo o oooooooooooooooooocpoooJJulluljullLUUJUJUJLIlLLJIJUIlLJ UJ UJLj!ju!ju!ju!ju!ju!i(JJUJljllu!jL]!ju!ju!jLlJIJJLl!]LUUJ^CDC0eDCDtDC£>mT-(D(DCDh* CD CD(DCOCDCDCOCDCD<D<DCOlOCDCOtJ'CO*-'|il'CDCDCOCOt-r-t-r-t-T-^lO-r-^-T-lO T- T-T-T--r-t-r-r-T--r-r-f-inr-T--(-T-t-O4

CO CO CO CO CO CO'CO CMCOCOCOOO CO cOCO^t'COCOfOCOCDCOCOCDCOCOCDT— CD*—U>COCDtDCOT—T—T-V-T-'T-^'lOT-^-T-lO 1— T-T— *T-T— T-T-T— T-T— T-lO^-V-*ij*^-T— CNT— T-V-*—pppC3qppqqpo%c^ p p p ^ p p Q p p p p p p p p T - p (-jppppOOOC3OOOC3C3OO O OO O CD CPOOCDOOOCD O O O O O

XXXXXX-s-jXXXcQ X XX

> CO CD IO CD CDCDiJ'CDCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCPCOCPCNlCO^t'lOCDCDl'OCDI Cp O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C p C D O O C p

jjLLJLLJUJLLJLLJUJLLltillilLUlil UJ u!jLJJUJUJUJL]JLlJLlJlj!jLJJu!jLJJlJlljUJ[JJLyrococococococDpcococoio co cocococo^ccJcocococococo^cpcocoiococNipc^oco^coCrJ^r^^WlO W •T-:Wr-:'«-;^J:'r^'r^WT-^T^T-^^:T-:T-^^T-^CNicxi^-«-^ir-

N. fs- r^ i^ h» N- CD N. r^N-h-to N- N.N.ioN.t^N.N.N-h-h*r^i^-h-r-coN.iocDi^N.coN.OCpCpCpOC3OOOCD^>Cp O CDCDCDOOOC^CpCDCDCDCDCDCpOOOOCpOC^C:)JJLIJLUUJLLJLLJUJUJUJUjLllUJ UJ-^ ._ ._ — — ._-._ .- ._ -_ _ ^

; xx x x x x x x x-o x x m x m m x x-j xCOCOCDCOCDCDCMt-CDCOCOO CO CDCOr^CD^~CDCDCOCOCOCOCOCDCOCDCON-mcOCO^COp p p p p p ^ q p p p ^ _ _d d d d d d dddd d dd d d d d d d d d d d d d dd opoppppcjqpppQ- p pp'~p8pppppppppT^plNoippo'p

ro u'

f±C O < D O O d ) t £ C U

10 C-aa.s gO O O ) C CO fc ff - S 0) ~O O-aa. fcc o.,, o, - = "

.•e~p-2Sg4ir>coc:e£WNNcM«M5,^- -

3-33

Page 49: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

ICo

SwS" •»« ss «•H c§ -2y, 2•rr o^^* C

£ U

XXXXXoQX ~x=;xxxi<x'_>-, x-, -,x so

S CO 10S co S

*w

Ts

CO

o:

CO OCO CO

_a

CC ^ en

55

•g s3 "~in

iuIluIlL^lilllulluIluIlullLiuJlIlUJlilLLIuIlUJLULLlLLJLLlLLJlJJT-'WT;T-:r-:^:T^»-:t^»-:»-T^T-^T-^T^Wr-:C>i'^:'-cOCOCNT^

jjiiiuju!jij!ju!ju!ju!]ujLi!iuliLuu!jLiJLi!jLiiu!jLi!jujujijJiijujuj

oo_ooG>0-p^c;cDcjC3c>o. C3p0-0'^qc3 qpdo odd d d d d d d d do do

X !X I>tf X X *v» i^ **\ I>tf 5 X itf X X X «v* »<\ X •-^ — X

iuIlU-ILlIlLlIllilliuIlullu!luIlLl!lu!lljIjuIllJJUJUlUJUJLUUJLIJUJt~- 00 •* T-

ooooooooocpooooooocpooooooliulllUullLUullUIUJUJLIJlilUJlilLlJuIlUJLLILUliJLlJUlUJllluIl

O T- ID *-

d d d d d d d d d d d d do do

X X X X X m X

jpCOCOCOCOlOCO^t'lOCOlOCOCOCOCOcDlOlO^'COCO^'

O S^liuljU-JljIjuIjlUlilJ^^lLIUJMJUJLyiiLLIIlIlilUJLLlliJLLILU^ ^ *5 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO

t^t^t^t^h~coh-tocDi^c0i~.f~r-r-t--coir>>or-h-'«-h-i--ocpcDoooooooocpoooooooocpcDocpULiJllJUlUJLIJUJLilLiJliJULlLiJUJUJliJlilLLlLLllllUJLlJUJLIjmCOCOCOCOCO(O(OCOCNCOC»CO(O(OCOU}mOOO<OCMCMT-(O

X X X X X ^ Q X

ddddd d d ddddd do do

11If

i ^ .• • •

d £ S S •S2 - 0) <D y|£ o§ I B•6 'S

m w- C

Jif•S S j S £ S gf 4 i i 8 8 ! 111111l i l t - "o a oz z z

11 • -1 i il i f l S IjS « 75 > > >I 1 I I I I

11111113 CD ->K a s

I5l

11

3-34

AR3U680

Page 50: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-3A. MM5-SemivoIatile Average Emission Rates, in g/sec

Benzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fiuorantheneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenz(a,h)anthracene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneFluorantheneHexachlorobenzenelndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyreneNaphthalene

p-Naphthylamine

2-Nitroaniline4-NitroanilineNitrobenzenePentachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPyrene1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2,4,6-TrichlorophenoIAcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAnthraceneBenzo(e)pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)peryieneBenzole acidbis(2-Chloroethoxy)methanbis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalateCarbazole4-Chloroaniline4-Chloro-3-methyiphenoi2-Chloronaphthalene

Run5EmissionRate3(g/sec)

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07 X11.2E-06 J5.0E-07 J1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.9E-06 B

1.6E-07 X1

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.7E-051.6E-07X16.1E-07 JB1.6E-07 X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X15.8E-07 JB1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.9E-03 B1.6E-07X12.7E-05 B2.5E-06 B1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.7E-06 J1.6E-07X1

Run 6EmissionRate8(g/sec)

1.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X14.5E-07 J5.1E-07 J1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X15.7E-06 B

1.6E-07X1

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.3E-051.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.3E-06 J1.6E-07X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X15.5E-07 JB1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.4E-03 B1.6E-07X11.1E-04 B2.4E-06 B1.6E-07 X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07 X1

Run 7EmissionRate8(g/sec)

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X116E-07X11.6E-07X16.7E-07 J4.8E-07 J1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.2E-06 B

1.6E-07X1

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-051.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07 X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.5E-07 JB1.6E-07 X11.6E-07 X11.5E-03 B1.6E-07 X14.0E-05 B2.4E-06 B1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X1

AverageEmissionRate(g/sec)1.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-077.8E-075.0E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-076.3E-06

1.6E-07

1.6E-071.6E-071.5E-051.6E-073.1E-075.4E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-075.9E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-031.6E-076.0E-052.4E-061.6E-071.6E-076.8E-071.6E-07

3-35

AR3U68

Page 51: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-3A (Continued)MM5-Semivolatile Average Emission Rates, in g/sec

2-ChlorophenolDibenzofuran1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene3,3-Dichlorobenzidine2,4-DichlorophenolDiethylphthalate2,4-DimethylphenoIDimethylphthalateDi-n-butylphthalate2,4-DinitrophenolDi-n-octylphthalateFluoreneHexachlorobutadieneHexachlorocyclopentadieneHexachoroethane2-Methylnaphthalene2-Methylphenol4-Methylphenol2-Nitrophenol4-NitrophenolPhenanthrenePhenol1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol

Run5EmissionRate3(g/sec)

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.6E-06 B1.6E-07X11.8E-058.2E-06 B1.6E-07X11.9E-06 JB1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.5E-06 B1.0E-05 B1.8E-051.6E-07X18.2E-07 J1.2E-045.1E-07 J1.6E-07X1

Run 6EmissionRate8(g/sec)

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.6E-06 B1.6E-07 X11.9E-051.7E-05 B1.6E-07X11.3E-06 JB1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X12.1E-06 B3.5E-06 B1.5E-051.6E-07X19.3E-07 J1.0E-045.8E-07 J1.6E-07X1

Run 7EmissionRate8(g/sec)

1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X16.2E-06 B1.6E-07X11.9E-059.5E-06 B1.6E-07X11.7E-06 JB1.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07X11.6E-07 X12.2E-06 B3.2E-06 B1.5E-051.6E-07X18.5E-07 J1.0E-043.7E-07 J1.6E-07 X1

AverageEmissionRate(g/sec)1.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-076.4E-061.6E-071.9E-051.1E-051.6E-071.6E-061.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-071.6E-073.6E-065.6E-061.6E-051.6E-078.7E-07HE-044.9E-071.6E-07

a From Table 3.4-2.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).X2 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent >20% of the total.X3 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent <20% of the total.X4 Indicates that the value includes ND and J values that represent <20% of the total.

3-36

AR3U682

Page 52: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-3B. MM5-SemivoIatile Average Emission Rates in Ib/hr

Benzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(k)fluorantlieneChryseneDibenz(a, h)anthracene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneFluorantheneHexachlorobenzenelndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyreneNaphthalene

p-Naphthylamine

2-Nitroaniline4-NitroanilineNitrobenzenePentachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPyrene1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2,4,6-TrichlorophenolAcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAnthraceneBenzo(e)pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzole acidbis(2-Chloroethoxy)methanebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthaiateButylbenzylphthalateCarbazole4-Chloroaniline4-ChIoro-3-methylphenoI2-Chloronaphthalene

Run5EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

1.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X19.6E-06 J4.0E-06 J1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X15.5E-05'B

1.3E-06X1

1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-041.3E-06 X14.8E-06 JB1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06 X14.6E-06 JB1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.5E-02 B1.3E-06X12.2E-04 B2.0E-05 B1.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.4E-05 J1.3E-06X1

Run6EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X13.6E-06 J4.1E-06 J1.3E-06 X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X14.5E-05 B

1.3E-06 X1

1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.1E-041.3E-06 X11.3E-06X11.0E-05 J1.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X14.4E-06 JB1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.1E-02 B1.3E-06 X18.9E-04 B1.9E-05 B1.3E-06 X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X1

Run 7EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

1.2E-06 X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06 X15.3E-06 J3.8E-06 J1.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X14.9E-05 B

1.2E-06X1

1.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.3E-041.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-06 X15.2E-06 JB1.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-02 B1.2E-06X13.2E-04 B1.9E-05 B1.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06X1

AverageEmissionRate(Ib/hr)1.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-066.2E-064.0E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-065.0E-05

1.36-06

1.3E-061.3E-061.2E-041.3E-062.4E-064.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-064.7E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-021.3E-064.7E-041.9E-051.3E-061.3E-065.4E-061.3E-06

3-37

AR3U683-

Page 53: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-3B. (Continued)MM5-SemivoIatile Average Emission Rates, in Ib/hr

2-ChlorophenolDibenzofuran1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene3,3-DichIorobenzidine2,4-DichlorophenolDiethylphthalate2,4-DimethylphenolDimethylphthalateDi-n-butylphthalate2,4-DinitrophenoIDi-n-octylphthalateFluoreneHexachlorobutadieneHexachlorocyclopentadieneHexachoroethane2-Methylnaphthalene2-Methylphenol4-MethyIphenoI2-Nitrophenol4-NitrophenolPhenanthrenePhenol1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol

Run 5EmissionRate3(Ib/hr)

1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X15.3E-05 B1.3E-06X11.4E-046.5E-05 B1.3E-06 X11.5E-05 JB1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X15.2E-05 B8.1E-05 B1.4E-041.3E-06X16.5E-06 J9.4E-044.0E-06 J1.3E-06X1

Run6EmissionRate8(Ib/hr)

1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06X15.2E-05 B1.3E-06X11.5E-041.3E-04 B1.3E-06 X11.0E-05 JB1.3E-06X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.3E-06X11.3E-06 X11.7E-05 B2.8E-05 B1.2E-041.3E-06X17.4E-06 J8.2E-044.6E-06 J1.3E-06X1

Run?EmissionRate*(Ib/hr)

1.2E-06X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X14.9E-05 B1.2E-06X11.5E-047.6E-05 B1.2E-06 X11.3E-05 JB1.2E-06 X11.2E-06X11.2E-06X11.2E-06 X11.2E-06 X11.8E-05 B2.5E-05 B1.2E-041.2E-06X16.7E-06 J8.2E-042.9E-06 J1.2E-06X1

AverageEmissionRate(Ib/hr)1.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-065.1E-051.3E-061.5E-049.1E-051.3E-061.3E-051.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-061.3E-062.9E-054.5E-051.3E-041.3E-066.9E-068.6E-043.8E-061.3E-06

a From Table 3.4-2.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).X2 Indicates that the value includes NO values that represent >20% of the total.X3 Indicates that the value includes ND values that represent <20% of the total.X4 Indicates that the value includes ND and J values that represent <20% of the total.

3-38

Page 54: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

"3*?ij

e(U•B*sV*

*vV)5STf

1*rO••*

S

•g£80 " "e|Sll

= 1 1 c "~[£ co

|l

« u.d £

ill!°> f CO | f | Ic a «(£ OT

'c

11<

fgilro ""•* 3 *o0>'r" ? "a

in o .E i •£c fl «1 W

S*w-•g3

^c cn'g

S 1

p "3o ^-^

1

x x x x x x x x x x x x xo o o o o o o o o o o o o

x x x x x x x x x x x x xo o o o o o o o o o o o oG O O O C O C O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O C )oooooooooooood d d d d d d d d d d d d

» - ^ _ ^ . ^ — _ _ . _ __ _ ._ _ _ .__-J--^J--'— J « - J — / - J - J - J — J-J-J

X X X X X X X X X X X X XC M C N J t M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C N l C MO O O O O O C O 0 3 C O C O O O G O C O O O O O C Oo o o o o o o o o o o o od d d d d d d d d d d d d

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ^ _ j _

o o z, a = := z, =

t o m i n i o t t > m i n i n i n L o t n i o i oo o o o o o o o o o o o o

o1o

fl 1o> a> _ w £• S™ ro ro TO 1 o E

cgi9999||.g=ali 8 . 5 N- 5 5 S 1 S 1 1" S.

• 1

j5^eo<uxi£

•§||| 1E (D CO 00 •§

<g ci co m cCD II II II 3

1 c c c fe

^ G)

1 1^ -D

8 • §8 |1 §S 8§ sI ^re 3

,

5R3U&85

'«•CDJD

i 1Jr . . 03•2 S S £_J o O "tt

3 ^ ^J > »pS ^ £ £ oj £ "o "5 v*ro -J 2 *5 * *^ O o o d5D_ * cj cw 85

llfllf1 | |- 1. 1. 1

1 i | II I| D 0 || TO ^ 5 T3fe£ § § ra '

"S3 13 ~ "o 5 T35* (TI O .£•* ,5 ,S

^ ^ "ro *ro "to "ra^ E o © a S1 1 m ilillll8 S S 8 S 8niiiim -, x S S x

3-39

Page 55: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

8•*->£

"mission ]

hM•o«VI

O•*•>

2•«->cuwouV12*C•«•*W5

<¥IT)S!viT<*>~2£

r-co;

CO

3K

c££

J30)

2o'S5u

UJ

dco' oCOraO).MosOT

2]J3sg'«10

ELU

6cooCOCOD).*:o£tn

n32rao'«f/>'eUJ

6couinro

u3V)

'£'€

trCD-tos

ItoD>^

"C"-C.Q

0)CO

S

OCO

0)i

T"s

CD

O>

E"<r<T3c

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

C D C D C D C D C D C D C D C O C D C D C D C D C DO O O O O O O O O O O O OLULULI1UJLLIUJLL1L1JII1UJL1J11ILLIC M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M O J C g i N C M C MC D C O C O C O C O C D C O C D C O C O C O C O C O

o o o c p c p c s c p o c p c p c p o oU J L J J L U U J l i J l U U J U J U J t l l L I I U J U Joooocooooomcocooooocooooo|s. (>« t h- |s. js.

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

C O C D C D C O t O C O C O C D C O C O C O C D C OO O O O O O O O O O O O OjJUJUJlilLUliJUItilllllLlUJUJLLI^cocococococococococococoC D C D C D C D C D C D C O C 0 C O C D C D C D C D

rs.ts.|s.|s.|s.|s.fs.|s.rs.|s.ts.|s.|s.O O O O O O O O O O O O OJ J U J L U U J L U U J I U L I J L I J U J U J L U L U3)O>O>O>O>C7)O>C7>O)C7)a)a)C7)ts.fs.|s.|s.|s.fs.|s.rs.|s.|s,|s.|s.|s.

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O G O C O C O O O C O C O C O C O O O O O C OO O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

C O C D C D C O C D C D C O C O C O C 0 C O C O C OO O O O O O O O O O O O O1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1L U U I U J U J U J U J L U U J U J L U U J U J U JlointniniotoinioinmintoinCDCDCDCDCDCOCDCDCDCDCOCOCD

rs.|s.|s. |s.|s.|s.rs.|s.ls.|s.|s.|s.O O O O O O O O O O O O OU J L U U J U J U J U J U J l l J L L I l i J U J l i l U J

C Q C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O Q O

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

C N C M C M C M C N C N C M C M C M C M C M C M C MO O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O

CDCraXCD

CD °•£: o| £ %

£ a, - « £ |m c = t= co i. .2ISQUILUH^S 2|-g

cil§§§§H.§l|ls 9 **.*.*. I 111 &T< B ^-Tt-CMTtrfUJUJlUUJTca.

3-40

AR3U686

Page 56: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-6A. MM5-Pesticide Average Emission Rates in g/sec

Aidrina -Chlordaney -Chlordane4,4 -ODD2,4 -DDE4,4 -DDE4,4 -DOTEndosulfan 1Endosulfan sulfateEndrinEndrin aldehydeHeptachlorP -Hexachlorocyclohexane

Run5EmissionRate3(g/sec)8.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X18.1E-07 X1

Run 6EmissionRate3(a/sec)7.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X17.9E-07 X1

Run 7EmissionRate3(g/sec)7.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X17.8E-07 X1

AverageEmissionRate(g/sec)7.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-077.9E-07

a From Table 3.4-5.

X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).

MRI-AppIi«NU620-28.S3A 3-41

AR3IU687

Page 57: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

ITable 3.4-6B. MM5-Pesticide Average Emission Rates in Ib/hr

Aldrina -Chlordaney -Chlordane4,4 -ODD2,4 -DDE4,4 -DDE4,4 -DOTEndosulfan 1Endosulfan sulfateEndrinEndrin aldehydeHeptachlorP -Hexachlorocyclohexane

Run5EmissionRate3

Jlb/hr)6.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X16.5E-06 X1

Run 6EmissionRate3(Ib/hr)

6.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X16.3E-06 X1

Run 7EmissionRate3(Ib/hr)

6.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X16.2E-06 X1

AverageEmissionRate(Ib/hr)6.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066?3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-066.3E-06

a From Table 3.4-5.

X1 Indicates that the value consists only of ND values (using one half the DL for ND values).

MRI-Applie*R3«20-Z8.S3A 3-42

AR3U688

Page 58: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-7. Matrix Spike Recoveries (XAD) for SVOCs

NAME

Benzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenz(a,h)anthracene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneFluorantheneHexachlorobenzenelndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyreneNaphthalene

p-Naphthylamine

2-Nitroaniline4-NitroanilineNitrobenzenePentach lorobenzenePentachlorophenolPyrene1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2,4,6-TrichlorophenolAcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAnthraceneBenzo(e)pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzole acid

% Recovery(for 25 ug spike level)QA Objective 50-1 50%

929294899292767397899483

3ga,b

8756809341 a997990839188861079269

a Recovery outside QA objective range of 50-150%.b Recovery result of 36% is for a separate matrix spike of p-Naphthylamine only.

MRI-AppIicd\R3620-28.S3A

Page 59: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-7 (Continued)Matrix Spike Recoveries (XAD) for SVOCs

NAME

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methanebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalateCarbazole4-Chloroaniline4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-ChlorophenolDibenzofuran1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine2,4-DichlorophenolDiethylphthalate2,4-DimethylphenolDimethylphthalateDi-n-butylphthalate2,4-DinitrophenolDi-n-octylphthalateFluoreneHexachlorobutadieneHexachlorocyclopentadieneHexachoroethane2-Methylnaphthalene2-Methylphenol4-Methylphenol2-Nitrophenol4-NitrophenolPhenanthrenePhenol1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol

% Recovery(for 25 ug spike level)QA Objective 50-1 50%

8497937571848676957433 a819561929114 a95897729 a74907675797287788278

a Recovery outside QA objective range of 50-150%.b Recovery result of 36% is for a separate matrix spike of p-Naphthylamine only.

MRI-Appfe*R3«20-28.S3A 3-44

AR3U690

Page 60: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-8. Matrix Spike (XAD) Recoveries for Pesticides and Surrogates% Recovery

(for 5 jig spike level)Q A Objective 50 -150%

Aldrina -Chlordaney -Chlordane4,4 -ODD2,4 -DDE4,4 -DDE4,4 -DOTEndosulfan IEndosulfan sulfateEndrinEndrin aldehydeHeptachlorp -Hexachlorocyclohexane

Surrogate Recoveries (%)2-FluorophenolPhenol-d52-Chloropheno!-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4Nitrobenzene-d52-Fluorobiphenyl2,4,6-TribromophenolTerphenyl-d14

951111111011081129699961229796101

6876747584838787

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.S3A 3-45

AR3U69I

Page 61: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-9. MM5-SemivolatiIe Blank Train AnalytesAssociated with Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in

Sample Trains

ButoxyethoxyethanolBenzoic acidXylenes aEthyl benzaldehydeMethyl benzoateAlkane aBenzaldehydeUnknown aEthyl benzoic acid aEthyl acetophenone aDecane + C3 benzeneAlkyl acetophenone abis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateEthyl methyl benzoateAcetophenoneDichlorocyclohexaneDimethyl cyclohexanePhenol

Total

TIC660

215684039272323221512

105.84.93.3

amount (ng)

Z

zZzzzzzzzz

zzzz

Targetanalyte"

526

10.2

1.59

a This compound represents the sum of several similar compounds withunique mass spectra that cannot be otherwise identified using the massspectral library.

b From Table 3.4-1.

Z Indicates a compound that is only tentatively identified and semiquantitated.

3-46

AR3U692

Page 62: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-10. Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 5 MM5-SemivoIatiIe Train

Benzole acidButoxyethoxyethanolXylenes aBenzaldehydeEthyl berizaldehydeUnknown Alkane aUnknown aMethyl benzoatePhenolEthyl benzoic acidDichlorocyclohexaneEthyl acetophenoneDecane + C3 benzeneBromobenzenelodobenzeneMethyl hexenoneHydroxymethyl pentanoneDimethyl cyclohexanebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthaIateNitrobenzene

Total amount (ng)Target

TIC analyted599 B

250 BZ243 BZ120 BZ120 BZ57 Z54 BZ43 BZ

36.436 BZ25 BZ16 BZ15 BZ14 Z12 Z11 Z10 Z9.1 BZ

8.38 B5.18

Stack gasconcb

([ig/dscm)1968280393919181412128.25.24.94.63.93.63.33.02.71.7

Emission Rate0(g/sec) (Ib/hr)

2.0E-03 B 1.5E-02 B8.1E-04 BZ 6.5E-03 BZ7.9E-04 BZ 6.3E-03 BZ3.9E-04 BZ 3.1E-03 BZ3.9E-04 BZ 3.1E-03 BZ1.9E-04 Z 1.5E-03 Z1.7E-04 BZ 1.4E-03 BZ1.4E-04 BZ 1.1E-03 BZ1.2E-04 9.4E-041.2E-04 BZ 9.3E-04 BZ8.1E-05 BZ 6.5E-04 BZ5.1E-05 I3Z 4.1E-04 BZ4.9E-05 BZ 3.9E-04 BZ4.6E-05 Z 3.6E-04 Z3.9E-05 Z 3.1E-04 Z3.6E-05 Z 2.8E-04 Z3.3E-05 Z 2.6E-04 Z3.0E-05 BZ 2.4E-04 BZ2.7E-05 B 2.2E-04 B1.7E-05 1.3E-04

a This compound represents the sum of several similar unknown compounds with unique mass spectra thatcannot otherwise be identified using the mass spectral library.

b Concentration calculated from volume of gas sampled, 3.056 dscm (from Table 3.1-1).c Emission rates calculated from average stack flow rate, 597 dscm/min (from Table 3.1-1).d From Table 3.4-1.

B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.Z Indicates a compound that is only tentatively identified and semiquantitated.

3-47

Page 63: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-11 Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 6 MMS-SemivoIatile Train

Benzoic acidUnknown aAlkane aXylenes aBenzaldehydebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateEthyl benzaldehydePhenolMethyl benzoateDichlorocyclohexaneEthyl benzoic acid aHydroxymethyl pentanoneMethyl hexenonelodobenzeneBromobenzeneAlkyl acetophenone aDecane + C3 benzeneAcetophenoneBiphenylEthyl methyl benzoate

Total amount (|ig)Target

TIC analyte"438 B

151 Z99 BZ77 BZ54 BZ

35.3 B34 BZ

32.931 BZ26 BZ23 BZ11 Z11 Z10 Z9.3 Z9 BZ

8.3 BZ6.3 BZ6.2 Z6.2 BZ

Stack gasconcb

(ng/dscm)14148322517111111108.37.33.53.53.23.02.92.72.02.02.0

Emission Rate0(g/sec) (Ib/hr)

1.4E-03 B 1.1E-02 B4.8E-04 Z 3.8E-03 Z3.1E-04 BZ 2.5E-03 BZ2.4E-04 BZ 1.9E-03 BZ1.7E-04 BZ 1.4E-03 BZ1.1E-04 B 8.8E-04 B1.1E-04 BZ 8.5E-04 BZ1.0E-04 8.2E-049.8E-05 BZ 7.8E-04 BZ8.2E-05 BZ 6.5E-04 BZ7.1E-05 BZ 5.7E-04 BZ3.5E-05 Z 2.8E-04. Z3.5E-05 Z 2.8E-04 Z3.2E-05 Z 2.5E-04 Z2.9E-05 Z 2.3E-04 Z2.8E-05 BZ 2.3E-04 BZ2.6E-05 BZ 2.1E-04 BZ2.0E-05 BZ 1.6E-04 BZ2.0E-05 Z 1.6E-04 Z2.0E-05 BZ 1.6E-04 BZ

a This compound represents the sum of several similar unknown compounds with unique mass spectra thatcannot otherwise be identified using the mass spectral library.

b Concentration calculated from volume of gas sampled, 3.116 dscm (from Table 3.1-1).c Emission rates calculated from average stack flow rate, 590 dscm/min (from Table 3.1-1).d From Table 3.4-1.

B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.Z Indicates a compound that is only tentatively identified and semiquantitated.

3-48

Page 64: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.4-12 Twenty Largest Peaks Identified in Run 7 MM5-Semivolatile Train

Benzole acidEthyl benzaldehyde aXylenes aBenzaldehydeChlorinated unknownDichlorinated unknownAlkane aMethyl benzoateUnknown aPhenolEthyl benzole acid aEthyl acetophenone abis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateAlkyl acetophenone aBromobenzeneC14H2002 Alkyl cyclohexadienedioneEthyl methyl benzoateDecane + C3 benzeneHydroxymethyl pentanonelodobenzene

Total amount (ng)Target

TIC analyted472 B

340 BZ111 BZ55 BZ42 Z42 Z38 BZ37 BZ37 BZ

33.327 BZ18 BZ

13.0 B12 BZ11 Z11 Z11 BZ10 BZ10 Z10 Z

Stack gasconcb

(|ig/dscm)14610534171313121111108.45.74.03.63.43.43.43.13.13.1

Emission Rate0(g/sec) (Ib/hr)

1.5E-03 B 1.2E-02 B1.1E-03 BZ 8.4E-03 BZ3.4E-04 BZ - 2.7E-03 BZ1.7E-04 BZ 1.4E-03 BZ1.3E-04 Z 1.0E-03 Z1.3E-04 Z 1.0E-03 Z1.2E-04 BZ 9.4E-04 BZ1.1E-04 BZ 9.1E-04 BZ1.1E-04 BZ 9.1E-04 BZ1.0E-04 8.2E-048.5E-05 BZ 6.7E-04 BZ5.7E-05 BZ 4.5E-04 BZ4.0E-05 B 3.2E-04 B3.6E-05 BZ 2.8E-04 BZ3.4E-05 Z 2.7E-04 Z3.4E-05 Z 2.7E-04 Z3.4E-05 BZ 2.7E-04 BZ3.1E-05 BZ 2.5E-04 BZ3.1E-05 Z 2.5E-04 Z3.1E-05 Z 2.5E-04 Z

a This compound represents the sum of several similar unknown compounds with unique mass spectra thatcannot otherwise be identified using the mass spectral library.

b Concentration calculated from volume of gas sampled, 3.238 dscm (from Table 3.1-1).c Emission rates calculated from average stack flow rate, 603 dscm/min (from Table 3.1-1).d From Table 3.4-1.

B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.Z Indicates a compound that is only tentatively identified and semiquantitated.

695

3-49

Page 65: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.5 PCDD/PCDF Emissions Results

PCDDs/PCDFs present in the stack emissions were collected using EPA Method 23, todetermine total PCDD/PCDF concentrations and the concentration of 2,3,7,8-substituteddioxins and furans. The extraction, cleanup, and analysis for PCDD/PCDF were done inaccordance with EPA Method 23 with a few minor modifications as specified in the TrialBurn Plan. Analysis was performed by high resolution gas chromatography/high resolutionmass spectroscopy. Dioxin and furan levels were calculated by comparison to calibrationstandards and results are summarized in Table 3.5-1. The 2,3,7,8-substituted TCDD/TCDFresults are summarized in Table 3.5-2. In Table 3.5-3, each 2,3,7,8-TCDD/TCDF congenerwas converted to its 2,3,7,8-equivalent using EPA's 1989 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxic equivalencyfactors. The total 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentrations and mass emission rates areincluded in Table 3.5-3. The average 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent emission rate for all runs isshown in Table 3.5-4.

It was noted that the toluene QA rinses for the sample trains did contain some OCDD.This might have been interpreted to mean that the amounts of OCDD in the sample trainswas biased low. However, this is refuted by the fact that the toluene rinse for the blanktrain contained a greater amount than that found in the sampling train QA rinses, indicatingthat there is no such bias.

Surrogate recovery data for all the samples, including QC samples, are given inTable 3.5-5. All recoveries meet the QA objectives for PCDD/PCDF analysis. Other QCresults are shown in Table 3.5-6, including a laboratory control sample (blank XAD) whichwas spiked with all the 2,3,7,8 substituted dioxins and furans. Recoveries for these targetanalytes in the laboratory control spike were all within 85-126%, which met the QAobjective of 30-150%.

Two EPA audit samples were also analyzed along with the actual samples from theRisk Burn. MRI's analytical results for those two audit samples are shown in the tables andare being reported separately to EPA as required.

MRI-Appli«WUS20-28.S3B 3-50

AR3U696

Page 66: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.5-1. Dioxin/Furan Results for MM5-M23 Samples

AnalyteField

blank trainSample volume (dscm)a —Stack flow rate (dscm/m)aCarbon Dio.xide cone. (% dry basis)"

Dioxins (ng)TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDD

Furans (ng)TCDFPeCDFHxCDFHpCDFOCDF

Total dioxins and furans (ng)

Total Concentration

Total Concentration(corrected to 7%

(ng/dscm)

(ng/dscm)O2 equiv)b

O.00130 U<0.00071 U

0.0110.0450.094

0.0140.012<0.046 U0.0550.051

0.28

,--

Run 53.16259710.4

0.6310.9690.7930.188 B0.135 B

0.3330.2620.2750.251 B0.101 B

3.94

1.25

1.02

Run 63.310590

10.5

0.5430.8000.6170.174 B0.144 B

0.2290.2770.2340.198 B0.069 B

3.29

0.992

0.803

Run?3.451603

10.4

0.4260.7320.6830.171 B0.174 B

0.2910.2170.1960.168 B0.074 B

3.13

0.908

0.742

a From Table 3.1-1.b Corrected to 7% O2 equivalent per Appendix B of the Trial Bum Plan.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.B Indicates that the measured value is not greater than 5X the blank value.- Not applicable.

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.S3B

AR3U697

Page 67: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

JS"B.S

° u,

| I I»n

<! c-2 cs ^2

*W1.2U

2-S c

D:

33333=1=1 333=1=133=1=1=11 y C! ts ts *-S g ?5 <N eg S: r: 5N i <e 01fec5t5c5oo ^6c5c5c3aooc5oS 8 s 8 o o 888 o °' 8 8 •=> °' °V V v Voooo ooo oo• • • • * ' * • V V V V V

— CQ..-COCQ _._._CQCQCQCQCOCQCO

CO (N CD JO 00P es s-qjooeSSoSo

o « o o W»«ooooooo

333=1=1£?=1 333=1=1E?3=1=1=1

™ ™ "dfc3 MfifiSBS^bSd

3 ? ? ?d d d d 800° ° ° 8 ° ° °

3 3 -» -> -> -> ->O O CO CO UJ O> CO

g g o' d d o° d § d d d d d d d d o'8080808

CQ CQ CO CQ GQ QQ CO DQ i*n CQ CQ

CO t" OJ 00 00 * " CO T~ CO 00 f CO tf" CJ Oi * "T- S. v- <N CO Q> S- CNCMCOlSCNCNdOCNN.

d g d o' d d d d d d d d d d d d o'dv

vto

K_O

CO _, QQ _ OQCQCQ 93 P3 _ CD 03 CQ _^ CQ QQ CQ

o-psip3* g.sgJBSgpggo g o o o d o d d d d d d g d d d

& ? ?

CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ ff% rft I[T fft CQ gO

wcoffiSgjg ggoggpcs.™*^in

o:

£*. J, ~ 2 &£ »i * * 3 3- . !— 3_£ 2_: * i2 ^

_ d g d d d o" o" d d d o' d d S d o d3 9 0

-o-^-i->-j3-»-j-^te 5 ^o t> c3 e d S- .-& Q 5 o, a gggoSSSaoS

o g o o o o o oooooogoood o'V V

u_ Q. Q. u_ D Q Qlj_ f^ O Q Q O O/™\ f C r ? O- O-

' 06 N." N." eo" <o" co" " H- oi oi N." (C rC oo" co" r-" id¥> % - - - - - - — ^_c oo t>-" -" to" t-T -" -" g co t h *~ co" co~ r" c" •x r-T co" co" co" co" co" co" « NT co" -<f co" co" •*" co" co" co" t.S co" CM of of of of of 5 co" of co" of of co" of of of oQ Of r T-" l- T T-" T-" U. Of T-" Of T-' •«-' Of " " "

5

3-52

.AR3U698

Page 68: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

•22t5«sfeJA^

Uo\eoH•VI•«•*

"sPSW5

"c5IavW.oQUeo

"I•

3*«i—

H™

K.

C

*

CDC

cl

lOc3or

A n n

t- CO *tin o ,-:•* CO P.

¥OJ

»if1" 1 illCD -» CD

3 2 'Xo 5 .2jg <s= c

co S coCO CO Oa n nO — j«V™ is; .CO | OCO •«-

'to'55COJD

II "D11 p-ss*~* C -f

§ d•S co o2- 2, o<D a>| 2 |

CD C= c"5. ji ora S coCO CO O

re n re

CO 0) i- 10 °.CO

!sraJD

£•II -a11 •£• gSP "f5 *~||§

c J2 •§i 2 'x"5 5 .2j» <§ co. j<: og o -gco eo O

<HI

a IPsia•=•

^ o'5 miff 0)

J=L. -K

"o c*1— <w*

2_. Q}•*-= sD §a

'p'.> 5LU "&

•p

COT3

1"ra "3"5 JS1—

2en S•S

"m

°0

>f•=; co§•3LU ra

"*~

j(-Wii

1B)— '

T« **" jS ra

.w O

tl) *

Ira

CO CD —, -, CO CD CQ-^-jCQCQCOCO-^COCQ

o°ooooo ooqqoooqoo ® J2 TPIt! LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LI. 1 d d LU UJCD IO *""* ~ O ^ O CO t CO 00 O5 ^ ~ c> o* ^ CO^t co'odr^cMiri cdco^tT-t^iri CNCDCM T- »-

Tt COOOr-CMO CDCDCOr-t^tOOOCDCN!o oopqm oooqooqcNOpd do d odd do do

^SSicMcomS CMcNcomcNicMoocNr-OOOOOOT- OOOOOOO-T-OOdgddddd d d d d d d d d d ddV

CQ CQ— .CQCQCQ CQCQ— CQCQCQCQ CQCQ-3 -3^-3-3-3 -3-3-^-3-3-3 —3-3

n . . .if) ^ M rr, ^-IOID ocoo°ooooo oooooooooo ^ 5^2 VPLU LULULULULU LU LU LU LU UJ HI HI HI UJ O O LULUoo ococooo-y ocooentio COOT- o" o" cocoxj- cos-TfCM^ cocMinT-rooo COCDCN T-T-

OOOOCOGOCOIO OT~OCOT}'LOOT-O*—o oooo^f oodooo coooo ooo^o oo^oioq oo^jd odd o' do do do

r-t«-v-CMT-O)Tt CMT-COCDCOCNUDCMCMCOOOOOOO^ OOOOOOOi-OOdSoddod d o d d d d S d d o° °

—> —> ~* ~* —3 ~) —} ~* ~* ~* -3 —3 -1 -3-3

S°SSSSS §So8S§oS§§ 0 CD °gLU LULULULULU LU LU UJ LU LU LU LU LU LU q q LULUr^ CM CM — o co o> CD co j* T— o> in T— CN d d ocoTf CO CO T- CO Tt l» CO to CM T- 1*. -4- T- CO CM v-

S C O C O x - C O C M K. S- T- CM Is- "*T-T-OOOOtf OOOOOO rtOCO

° Podd° PPdddP P. dPO O O O O O O O O

U*)OOCD^*CDm tOCOON-^J'tOCMCM''?'^—T~ ^ ~ CM CO O5 CO CM CM *sj* - CO CNI ^ J" CO O

d g d d d d d d d d d d d g d d dd dV V

ddddPg dPdddddPPg " "O . ' O O O . '^••p*o o t c

I -sD) O) " ^ _ ||

"c § | 1"

Q LLU- m m N p C O C OQQQQ. LLU_U_U_CIQ QO tj£ i^,-

QQQQO U.U.QC1OQOO Qc g • §§QOOO5- DQOOOOS-J?- P8 S - S ' c o w

Q<£xxXob "-^^XXXXobS ro= c"S 'E ~

uj 1— oi> r-" r-" oo" CD" 1— ro co r-~ t~-" r-" ro" CD" i--" co" 5 > ^ w coc oo i~- 't CD" r--" ••t" Q ^ oo s-" N-" Tt" CD" CD" t-." -" t" CM" 3 s p co raxh*-cococococOQ nh^ co •COCO^COCOCOQ locu aj "^ «^ 2.2 co" CM" CM" CM" CN CM O 3 co" CM" co" CM" CM" co" CM" CM" CM" O o

oiO)

I1 I 1n coE ^ CM3 C X)CQ J5 0

1 o f£ £ S£ if) D.»- c LUO CO i-CQ £ S.=5 J2 Pc S CDCD CD S

f f |

•£ 'cu Ico a> 2 ra1 -15 1•3 > TD CO

co co O £ g "raCD CD vo SB P ^

111 l! !m ^5 "^5 ^*S 5 fc .— ~ i

ro ro c? "P c <D~~ o

ro £> o -3 CD Z

1/3

3

3-53

AR3U699

Page 69: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.5-4. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Average Emission RatesRun 5* Run 61 Run 71 Average

Emission rates for each run from Table 3.5-3.

Total 2,3,7,8-TCDDEquivalent EmissionRate (g/sec) 2.0E-10 1.6E-10 1.6E-10 1.7E-10

Total 2,3,7,8-TCDDEquivalent EmissionRate (Ib/hr) 1.6E-09 1.3E-09____1.3E-09 1.4E-09

MRI-AppE«RR3«20-28.S3B 3-54

AR3U700

Page 70: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

13"a.ft05

£Jjjj

JQ^s

.251tf£*«O

tfV-ta*€5W)O

SC/}

V3V)•

.£3

g3roS JU§O.C

<s S

1a.

COV)ca:aCO

I•s

ff- O (I)

•§ 8 S"

o •£f |

° ~.Z °>« COIL o>ILJ

0~y h-d£. '*t CDQ. inUJ

li

COc

inc3a:

•a I!i§ SLL c2

c

a

CD

inc

^

32!CD \x

b~l

f

*«•oo

00CO

_1*

CDCD

CO

<3>CO

0

S op Is-

1Q.a>£>- oo£ CD

Si?OCOV10 «X4)^2Sfc1

S«115"o

i

§S8^-CO

^On

00

CN

r—

"

S

mt -

m

r-

CN

f3

CMOO

in

OQ

Soo_1"co_^

5 K

h- ooco in

co cor** CD

CO IS

CO t"CD in

•<*• cof- CD

T- CN(-. to

CN CNr~- co

l~- CO

P CO

l«- O)l«- CD

T- 00I-- in

,8-PeCDF

8-PeCDD

h- t~-co" co"CN. CM.i i

pi w

in h-a> o>

h~ o>r>- N-

CN inoo oo

!•- Ot co

CO Oh- oo

in coOO CO

tf O5OO CO

co r«-00 CO

co *rco oo

j* CD

CN ino> a>

oo co

U. QQ Q

GO 00(«-" N-"CD CDco" co"CM. CM.

6 6CO f>

§0

fcS

o h-t O5

CD CO

ss

CO goo ~

•* sS °

S 8

t O)

N. Or o>

* ff3 2

m cor o>

LL. QO O0 Oa. a.i 5co" co""t co" co"CM. CM.

6 6CO CO

S

fe

CDOO

§

GO

S

0O

s

oooo

in00

g

COco

QQ

CM£5

COo>

z

^"Z.

z

I

I<

i

ino>

o>

>oOn0 g

33go o>cS1

g<n0)

1SoS8w^-S «°.3 "to m.||

^ 2

z z

c c2 2

z z

ss

z z

<<

z z

i- CO«- o

§5

ife

h- j

U.LL. Q

a. oooo. |Ch~" "*"J* COco" cvT

S 3n n

ffST-

co

z z

* cZ 21

Z Z

ss

z z

<<

< <

(QO) f00 CO

CD

_ inCO £

go

LL.

§8I en00. CO_

*f 'fco" to"CM" CN

33CO CO

3-55

AR3U70I

Page 71: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

CU"5.|C/3S2si5c'§C"«-w_•*•>"•C

C/500r.

fj*

ri

egVI•+*p1uo*veIT)fj1-*

A9tH

«M

ES8o20CO

J

_«ICOc.0"5

10)

8cco•§£

|||S ° 5£ 0

18gQ.O>

,0o>c

J X

_OBo ^

El.C-

£So "3>z SPi*m

T—0

z SLU

0)

"ca

co o o m g P. r:00 O) C3> OO 1 JI ,_

•* o o o o o oO CM CM CM CM CM •*

52 o o> o m o in55 co r- r- o CM •*Q T- T- T- CM CM •«*•

m r>- co co T- CD roo o o o T- T- T-o o o o o o od d d d d d d

CM O CO O CO O CMr co co co T- T- h>••": T 'r "*: "*: •*.0 0 0 0 0 O O

1 - Tf O i- CO If) COCD OS p 00 T v~ ^T- T- T- T- Tf •* •*

o d d d d d d

9 GQ Q Q Q HQ Q Q Q o

Q « X X T «l «O H- OO OO O> f - Is"

« Hp oo h~" r-" oo" CD" CDCeot^^-coi^-^-"^x^-cocococococc.2 co" CM" CM| CM" CM c\[ CN

s g g R s a „

•*ooooooooodCMCMCMCMCMCM'CMCM1*

? g « CM g g jjj g 5 g

/^^•^"CNJT— CMCMT~CM^*J

-~-~— » — » — » - ^

^ oo co Tf oo CM m

p g o o § o o °. o °. °. po S d d d d d ° d ° ° o

0 V V V V V V

xt* ^ O C3 T"™ T™ tf5 O * COO) co co o ^ ™ ^ oo r ^ CM oo*- d d d d d d d d d d CM'

§ S?S§sSII§ls.CN d d d d d d d d d d c\i

LL U. £u_ u. u. u- Q Q ou. U- Q Q Q Q . .O

:f §111111^1^1^ t-cQmt^t^t^<a<D r--" CD" "CO X- OO h*» f**» t* CO CO t*1* " J" t* **4" CQo ni^co^-coco^cocococoo*~ 3 co" CM" co" CM CM" co" CM CM" CM" CM H~

•d

Q)•«-«CD73"o"Si_a•g5!,COcCDt/5 CD*

i -2£3§^a«8'1CO "m

ll

D -j

3-56

AR3U702

Page 72: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.6 PCB Emissions Results

PCB emissions were sampled using the procedures in EPA Method 23 (PCDD/PCDF).Extraction and cleanup of samples was based on EPA Method 23, modified as appropriatefor PCB analysis instead of PCDD/PCDF. Samples were analyzed for PCBs by GC/MS perEPA draft Method 1668. PCB analysis results for the blank train and the method blanks areshown in Table 3.6-1, and results for stack samples are shown in Table 3.6-2. The blanktrain did contain some PCBs (37 ng) but the amount was less than in any of the sampletrains (181 to 260 ng).

Surrogate recovery data for the PCB analysis are included in Tables 3.6-1 and 3.6-2,which all were within the QA objective of 50-150%. However, there were no analysisresults for the toluene QA rinse for Run 7 since no laboratory surrogates were found;presumably because they were mistakenly not spiked. No portion of the original samplewas available that could be respiked and reanalyzed. This was not considered a seriousproblem since the results for the toluene QA rinses are not used in any calculation of results.

Recovery of PCBs spiked onto a blank XAD (i.e., laboratory control spike) shown inTable 3.6-3, met the QA objective of 50-170%. Recoveries determined in the initialprecision and recovery (DPR) samples shown in Table 3.6-4 met the QA objective of50-150% except for high recoveries of Di (BZ-5). Conversely, recovery of Di (BZ-5) was102% for the LCS (Table 3.6-3).

The results given in Table 3.6-2 were used to calculate the PCB emission rates shownin Tables 3.6-5, 3.6-6, and 3.6-7 and to calculate the average emission rate shown inTable 3.6-8.

MRI-Applied\R3620-:>,8.S3B 3-57

flR3U703-

Page 73: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

•ao

t-ooooiot^-cooooo•c"OSe

I

C2u

_com

Q) O O CD <I> CD-. —. —v 5 S 3 25 25 S—' — •—' CD CO CD CO CD CO

c5<\ic3o(No<OT-5?o sELs5.!5.!5.1i!!i 52 £; £i 1£ o3 o o_^ • * * -- J _• —^ —^ —^ ^^ ft ft o ft ft ft ^O W* WJ OJ __ __ __j ^ * ~ ^ ^ j j C3 * *~ •jj" tj~~ *••*• •••• ••*• ^ » ^. CO CO CO CO CO CO

y V V ->-_<• «--• -t • -t-i- «n- ii •o o o o o o2 ZZZZZ

O)

1

CD CD CD CD CD 0)

CO (0 CO CO CO COO O U U U U

Oi ^_^~_«, _co,_^;. "Q."Q. . ."Q."Q.R O O Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. Q.o o o co co co co co covvv 'o'S'o'o'o'oa?z z z zzz

S 5.1 «** .2U V0) O

to S g0) f> 0)o >U O0) U

O)

M ,. (0 X S Oen 2 o ^ CD o CD

oo co.JSco.Smeccc ScoT-ini-rMCMIS ._ *= S= 5S S-« 5 % aOOOOOO fcOOOOOOO

j 3 - 8Z U. _l

3-58

Page 74: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Q)(/)'' '<-> in CM r^ p p p 6 S 8 S S S Sdor: NO do oo •S.'B.'SLa'B.'S.

V V V Q.D.D.CXQ.D.£ \J (0 (0 (0 <D (0 <D

Ien

o

es2

eo

<oi5in

cl§

camcamcQCDCQcQN. O) T--

O oo

<D <D Q) Q> Q> Q>S S S B S S<D (0 (0 03 (0 (0.9. .9 .°. .y. .9. .9"a. "5. "a. "a. "a. "EL to <a <o <o to co (a(0 <D (D (0 (0 TO'o S 'S 'S "S 'oZ Z Z Z Z Z

o> o co in o(oo>oocoa>

a> CD a) a) a)

O O O O O OH Z Z Z Z 2

m m CD DO m CQ CQ. • • • • CO O CO ~

<o 0) <D <D <Drt "?S Ti *?Sro ro ro roo o o o' 'OOT-T-CM^OOOO 'o.'o..'Q.'a.'Q. eooomvv vv 0.0.0.0.0.0. ooo>o>"* »w m m m m m m. . . . . .ro ro ro ro ro ro• - - - - -

Z Z Z Z Z Z

ocMio<ooo0 (D S «0 S „ (0 <0

lo •*=5?SS?--Ssa» 5 3 H H (S 1 1 O Z Q " <

SOOOOOO gOOOOOOO« " J2 J2 ? <2 S-o *"i -8il _J

3-59

Page 75: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.6-3 Results for Laboratory Control Spike of XAD

Amount FoundAnalyte Spiked (ng)

Mono (BZ-2)Di(BZ-5)Tri (BZ-29)Tetra (BZ 50)Tetra (BZ 77)Penta (BZ 87)Penta (BZ 123)Penta (BZ 11 8)Penta (BZ 11 4)Penta (BZ 105)Penta (BZ 126)Hexa(BZ154)Hexa(BZ167)Hexa(BZ156)Hexa(BZ157)Hexa(BZ169)Hepta(BZ188)Hepta(BZ180)Hepta(BZ170)Hepta(BZ189)Octa (BZ 200)Deca (BZ 209)

Field Surrogates Spiked - QA Objective13C3-Mono13C15-DJ13C52-Tetra13C153-Hexa13C202-Octa13C209-Deca

1.172.041.53 ,2.451.773.648.759.099.19.138.383.66

14.514.914.218.15.2817.118.318.96.198.54

50-150%

Amount Spiked(nq)22242410101010104202020206202020610

Recovery(%)

QA Objective50-170%5910277618991889191918492737571918886929510385

6583898490110

Laboratory Surrogates Spiked - QA Objective 21-178%13077-Tetra13C118-Penta13C105-Penta130126-Penta13C156-Hexa13C169-Hexa13C180-Hepta

91998893127111112

MRl-ApplKd\R3«20-28.S3B 3-60

AR3U706

Page 76: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.6-4. Initial Precision and Recovery (IPR) Results (% Recovery)

Natives Spiked -Mono (BZ-2)Di (BZ-5)Tri (BZ-29)Tetra (BZ SO)Tetra (BZ 77)Penta (BZ 87)Penta (BZ 123)Penta (BZ 11 8)Penta (BZ 11 4)Penta (BZ 105)Penta (BZ 126)Hexa(BZ154)Hexa(BZ167)Hexa(BZ156)Hexa(BZ157)Hexa (BZ 169)Hepta(BZ188)Hepta(BZ180)Hepta(BZ170)Hepta(BZ189)Octa (BZ 200)Deca (BZ 2:09)

Field Surrogates13C3-Mono13015-Di13052-Tetra13C153-Hexa13C202-Octa13C209-Deca

IPR1QA Recovery Objective

88397a706512398921118896847488929093788570738980

IPR 250-150%

92435s676512491971089298837789959193788672779078

IPR 3

91402a64621218798 -1148798847192919092708575788176

IPR 4

89406a7069119100951089098857697929491738976837870

Average

90410'68651229496110899884759293'9192758673788576

Spiked - QA Recovery Objective 50-150%668296965983

6884939763

. 84

6789931026492

6285941066690

6686941006387

Laboratory Surrogates Spiked - QA Objective 21-178%13077-Tetra13C118-Penta13C105-Penta130126-Penta13C156-Hexa13C169-Hexa13C180-Hepta

7182889492101131

7179891039597124

6778829387102117

7285859988102111

7081869791101121

' Outside QA objective for IPRs of 50-1 50%, as discussed in narrative for Section 3.6.

MRI-Applied\R3«20-23.S3B 3-61

Page 77: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

V)c-2fc.a

eo*K.2EW«UPi

iriNO

cu3

£Sg?•f— "„• II x-f00 « .2II -p- w

'Elf|I|p- CD O§ -S «=•§ " o> S «121C "^ Oc o ~n -2W 1

CDO

•£CQ

c

EUJ

(ACO0 o\x Co oco uCO

= - 1^ o> «S 5

1 1 ° 1c

£"c "8ii w 3E co< 0)

CQOQ.

^r~

J

a:•2

EV.

"cc=

1

3<_

nalvte

<

QQ QQ CQ QQ CQ

co N- r- r-- r t--o o o o o o r - o o o o c ni n o o o c o o o o U J U J U J U UCOI>-lO^'O>^'T— T-(M^

QQ QQ QQ CQ CQ

h«- oo co oo t - co9000000000001 1 1 1 1 O O Q T—

e S S c S c N i c N l o l i i ^ y o o

QQ QQ CQ CQ QQ

CO O) (D CD T— CD T~ o' o' O

CQ QQ QQ QQ QQCMCNC3)O)COT— jntOOlT-1_J ~ ~ O> CO O5 Irt ! . •

C O C M T - C O T — O O O

m rf\ fin fin fincN(NO>o>coT-inina)i-5! T- T- o> co' oi in °l °°COOI^^COT— ooo

1 .= ! ! 8 f i 1 S5Qh-l— D -XIOZC

<DG?

UJCMU)CO

N.sa>oo

1o

co co

if

3-62

Page 78: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

VOBSjP*<•oS&e

SWpa

VSH

-5inO

s ° 7t% ? iCO .09

?-x '1 j§

| § -oa) S- T|ag— 2 °> 5 o><U 0 -0•Q. « -|i H 'oTO Cvfrt *»* C•«i

(0O

3Sico'8'EHI

0 d"o oOB °

421 * 5 0 g "^ 0>

c

o•4- nC fl)0 «g 3£Z ' CO< cu

E

m2

^s

=

"o0)cj-D

1"5

"3c

c

1ccc

CO CO CO GO 00 CO CO

O O O O O O O O C Q OIf! M UJ UJ III }| | | ||J | |*

C O C M N - C O C O C O U J O l l J U JIs* CN r**1 ~ Is* o> !**• * u*j corj cd -<t rf i : co h-' (\i T- Tt

00 00 00 00 00 00 00

h- 00 CO CO CO 00 O)o o o o o o c o o c n oIII III III III 1 1 1 1 1 1 (^ III *l 1^O C O i - O O O O l U J C M L U L I J

co^couio^-co^in

00 00 00 00 00 00 00

J5o>^oio>o2-o2-!nco r (6 in oi in n. o °.o o

pfl ^ QQ (Q Pft (*| £JQ

^ , ^ <p~i> ^ | J f Y*« — QQ

JI CD O t CM* CD CO* °- *P

GO CO CO GO GO GO GO^ | ^ ^ J J fQ ^ ^ pQ

^ <d o i.' CM' co' co °. *P

i s f s f s g sO . _ - c o ) Q ) a ) < D O O < D2QJ-H-D.XXOZD

(D9UJCOinin

joUJor*-

i.H

JO.aa>£c

o(0(I)

o(D

Iil=5CD

T- (D

CO P>0) (1)SB££E Ee 2Li- UL

I

3-63

Page 79: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

*c

L.(2<u•w«K

.0*35VI

1W

§vo

•M

£

£

£S

d

2 I "c? " II £. -55tilIIIE a> °°12 §> 5 a)0) 0 -g

p 5 '§| 0 ~to « c1

COO

1aco1EUJ

COCO0 dy» C

CO

^^ 3 O QJ

ii ° 1^

4« "OC Q3

1 8 1< o

00oD.

C(

=

"ooi_

§(0

"5

'c

1

"5c<

CQ CQ CQ CQ CO ^ QQ fi

Co r ^ ** t1 * ?**• coooooor^-cooo o>o1 * 'i ' ' O O O fv* O '•

5oo>°?2oo^Scowcvi to co' oi co oi r T- CM <N| -"t

CO 00 00 CQ CQ 00 CQ CQ

r*- oo co oo oo fo o o o o o o c n o ) °°C O C o ! ^ O O U J U J U J ° U J O

co r- in co •* c\i co T- co co in

1iO Q O O Q Q O Q O Q C Q C Q C Q t^

i n i n o o o o o o c o c o ^ - c o c Mo' in o) co co ( j oq T o coco r •<*' co' •* o' o' d °.o

00 00 OQ 00 CQ 00 00 CQ

2 wi <o •«- w> oo CN "*. °. Tt^CMi-T-t- OOO

00 CQ 00 CQ CO GQ 00 CQ

S N « 2 - - « « e M 2 g 5

1 s f ss f g gO ._ 'F* CD CD CD 0) O O Q)SDJ— f— Q - X X O Z Q

cCO

a>£~c0ECO0)

ScCD

ffi

to

1oCD.2B.COCO$ICQ

^ c\i« CO(D CO

Ira

E ES SU- U_« a,

3-64

Page 80: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.6-8. Average PCB Emission Rate

PCB Emission rate (g/sec)1(lb/hr)a

Run5

8.19E-07

6.52E-06

Run 6

7.03E-07

5.58E-06

Run?

5.50E-07

4.36E-06

Average

6.91 E-075.49E-06

' From Tables 3.6-5 through 3.6-7

MRI-AppIietWU620-28.S3B 3-65

! !

Page 81: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.7 Metals Analysis Results for MM 5 -MM Samples

Stack emissions were sampled for 22 metals using EPA Method 29. Analysis resultsfor the samples and for the simulated blank train comprised of field reagent blanks, aregiven in Tables 3.7-1 and 3.7-2. For calculating the concentration and emission rates shownin these tables, one half the detection limit was used for the non-detect amounts.

As expected, some metals were found in the samples and in the blank train (e.g., Ba,Al, Ca, Mg, K and Na). Smaller quantities of some other metals were found inapproximately equal amounts in the samples and blank train (e.g., Be, Cr, Cd, Ni, Se, Ag,Sb, Co, and V). Several, if not all, of these metals likely represent background levels of themetals in the filter media used in the sampling train.

EPA Method 29 includes procedures for blank correction of results. These blankcorrected values are given in Tables 3.7-1 and 3.7-2. Blank correction was performed usingthe notes to Method 29, sections 8.4.3 and 8.5.3. The blank correction methods specifiedin Method 29 do not adequately address the situations which arise when analyzing for Ba,Al, Ca, Mg, K, and Na. Even though closely matching values were found for theseelements in both the samples and the blanks, the method only allows a small blankcorrection. Thus, the calculated emission values shown in the tables are almost certainlyhigher than actual emissions.

Whenever the EPA Method 29 blank correction amount was greater than the amountmeasured in the sample, a value of zero was used for the blank corrected amount. Also, avalue of l/2 the detection limit was used whenever the blank corrected amount was a "lessthan" value.

Metal emission rates for each run (from Tables 3.7-1 and 3.7-2), and the averageemission rates over all runs, are shown in Table 3.7-3. Emission rates for some of thesemetals are biased high as noted above.

QA results for matrix spike sample and standard reference materials are given inTable 3.7-4. Recovery for the matrix spike samples met the QA objective of 65-135% forall the metals except Ag. As noted in Table G4-7a of the Trial Burn Plan, low recovery forAg was expected since any Cl present forms AgCl which is not recoverable in the EPAMethod 29 digestion process.

MRI-ApplKd\R3620-28.S3B 3-66

Page 82: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Analysis results for the standard reference materials (SRMs) met the accuracy objectiveof 75-125% for all the metals that were present in the SRM. As discussed in Appendix J, aQC check standard and an interference check sample were also analyzed and met the QAobjectives.

MRI-Applie*R3620-28.S3B

Page 83: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

"81a

w w « e0101 S f £f«« -g I £ '

E* w v/ u u v *2 S S3e

C5

I1ence

H

I

E

<s

•0§*

-, X X> m" m"; 3m 3" xxx Dm 3" xxx =>3\ 5 t» t» _ a _

^ S S ° S 299 o ° 3 299 S°; o d °. w <*> d d °. \g j(j d

1 »g . -o •, -a « -aj g 0 g 0 g 0 g

; § d d d1 '0

m m3 -> 3 ->- 331 S § S § 8 §8» J2 d d do o'd3 {0J >* V V V

a — «•-§ S » - T - | N CD S S OOO (O 0 0 OO

O CO T~ O _ J T T h- !*•• rn • • W* ~ cri d to « i u u j ^ ^ ^ u j u j p,5 5 *" "° *° l ^ w w 123 CO ^ ^" 0

5 ^ J= T, .= -0

^ °— tf) tn in in in 10i c c o o a coco c o c o? 0 cd d i odd cod

aD

SCO CO QQ CO CO CDL. «

? *« uj d to d <NJ d1 > S= t t

? m D m xxx m D 1 x x X en =>2 _ a ai o»

^ i s s s s 8 9 9 s s s 5 9 9 s s5 "" *" ^S? 000 Q O I J *"= ui V «i

i o3 1 d d . d^ i5XI

mm 3 -f 3 m 3I | sj a ?! s. ?j| 5•* V V V

> I ^ I?s 1 !l,l S9 1 ?*1 9S*- *-" £ '"S * *" *=•" •" £ w *" *" v." 1

Q) _p 5 O lit 111 CD -T* ffl O UJ 111 O J

• n i l < ° i x cl^^K. a. dl

_

3" XXX

i 2 ?O O 111 UJ

» T-

-JO -i 3S<p w co rooh- o od d Id d d

1V V

m

csi °P 9 9

5 S

08 S K S 8uj o' to* d

1 X X S

w .„ ID m5 | 9 9

" d 1 1

-i-> 3 3"

SR2 S S??!d d o' do

V V

! I1 !tf ?? 1?ff1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s 1 1 1

1 i i ^ .6 iIJ n: x g n: xE 1

MM5-MM

en

en<U

« - - S>£«

Sffi SE e s

iIIIto to « •II II It

ii?? ? 1 Millmm m *• n 3 o P 1*liSS S I |*S 8 8III If !|1 |

s i s i i l l i i0:0:0: £ £ £ & <a ax a a

s R" 8". 8s

I tlIS. «"

i 3 l e s ji 5"1 I

i

* * C > illhlS. * S* 1 I * S

s-S^*1!^?!??II I slifll I

3-68

AR3U7U

Page 84: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

V

1B£51•M

•S 2c -^• M ^G•M Me So <uI— < '•••'^ s*2 «•5 M

^i.*»a••"3wj£"wa£>e

J

E

U

p.3gU

1

S

1IIs

•51i

1

D

g

I

|i

D

1CL

m

gB£

«taCD

I

I

CD CO CD

8 ? cB fe ? 9 " Jn**5 o *• c*i N ill iiJ * *-'

u r- CD i*. 03•e in i- w *-§00 o o

i

m m1 S S R £g - - . -.-•

CO CD CO £0 CO

V rj

-

§ « PJia

CD CO CD COMJo in in o

CO in N; «

CD CD CO 00 00

1 l"° i § S 2 5"°£ § a*• K

•W T>

o CM •«- C4 «-

§ CO O* tD O

CO COco -,- m -»£ (D CM 00 1 5 § S§

1 i

||| Iff fj

! } i III 11

D CO CO ,MM __ _ •«> *«

.|g '-•• »u

K 00S S

CO -) -3

o «- t- oo |u> «- «T- to ift f |r *- in^ 0' 0 0 0' g

Q CO CO CO

S S ? V ^ S " "99- a || s .• s | n j|n r> ^r w

-S»-n

m-j m -. -.SS m to w ^- (NCO to N- |(D ^ CO^ cJ ri *- liri ci

D m m m

S S?? f e ° t ^*^*v ro r{ ri

CM 1-

a> d

mm -a "a

S « 2! ? S> S Rrw o co o |(D o

? i > |

1 If! illl ii]] it i ii| iff f piii11 " 01UIU I11 i11

c c c

If ifeS SS S Sii n H111 dill 1.» w *> * 1as a 1 i111 j:II I I-•a-o -a f iw co o e 'EJf» co SO V- *~ ^CO CO CO' I.- •"

|| 1 |

Hi I 'B jg c s

SS 5 I •a a o s„» K f jIII n :|i

ER£|

«' i2 §

?^ 1II * 1

Ifc * 1^J 1 §

Mfjii^iiiPrt!i!!i;

-

5

1 1 1 1^ I 5 'B.1 1 e §

^ III

II |H• 1 i »> S M * ^

S - ? 5 ?i - s 1 *• 1HillIllHii i s i i i5 * S S2 «

| |i 1 1 |= J J S ll

' Ss a s s

n

I 55? 5 «

Wt if1 M*2 1 1HI § £

i|iifall

. ill!3 . fi "• 5Sff^lljji{]i * ^ 1 i!f?s|ll£ili! I * ! 1 3fluusii58!inn

3-69

AR3U7I5

Page 85: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

?jjjuSoUe,5fMj>{

1

e•o'ESH.s o "S

jr j'f»J Ma* 3 |£H M

i.WS

"3B5

tfW)

S

1

Selenium

15

g

CEGD

|1U

C

n

„ro(U

•D

Crem

1TJ

1acRa

1iaS

1t.Kcctffl

11cCl03

!sa

ir

x i s3 CO ,§ XXX 30 § x S S i 3m 3 S X X

fil ffi ° ffi £?? f f i S S £ 9 ? ffi ° 8 ? ? ?o o g « 5 ° o e a o 6 ° » »

e 5 • — * 5 ,''0 1 O <r- O *- O *-

1cl '•1 . .

3 ""• 3 B5 3 "' 33

^j C n t O OO ^ ^ T ) * * ; ^. *P ^. oS| do o**^ o'o O ^ - C M O

V V V V V

S? S£*- *\ 'S.O D D ' X X X £ 0 3 3 X X X E D S X X X

_ j _ j ( D U J U J O O ' CD UJ UJ OO til m mo'S2 PJ oi o'SS^ o i o J °'Sc5

to iri ID vi •» w

5 . 5 . 2 .^ , mo in o tn oC] °3 CD CDgl GO* GO CD

CD CO "I33 -r>* 0 -> 3 -> 3 D

^ *- CD T-r» in in o in <r- ^ nf jg *-. jr 5 J ^ j* g o eo 2*' •«-

V V V V V V

mmm m m CD c o c o m '^ I ^ o S p ? ? S C N O J S>9? S C N V S ? ?

5 £S *~ *~ t 12 *~ *" m S^ ^ « M* W «

£ - £ _ * _ ' .°—i S *~ S " S *"gj 00 80 GO

«

I CD ffl ffiM. eo-9 ffi-s eo-> -^LS n o. S oj o c3 S * in ? w^' C "" ol*" 3S*" 35""**"°*

* i ^ S ^ 1

s s I i i I =™1 §»i = = 1 =• 4 1 jq ? s 1 s si| i Hi Hi HI HI lii !i'f? illHi 111 itf 111 iff i i i i i t i i i tS o £ o il £ | o if Slu | o I oliB|Ko°^|6'

W

s s s

111III Ti"" " ? . ssis j 1 Ijlsss 5 i IS'sIII 1J 111M M M | § I £ C

°™° 5^5 "S"111 if* i|^E i i S * I I I I•oSS s^i 111m « e i g ? J ! , £ £ 5

55? iflllfi]** * i i£« ; : :E E E l i l i l l l

( • M M C .B 5

M M M a ^ s S 5 £ ^a a o •* -^ 5 i £ i 6" c *c E H 1 w co « crt3 S> 3 ^ - . J C Q ^ I S J M ^ -0:0:0: J x x x x

o

2 , ,. M "* 3i » 1 I

I 1 11q 1 I »!

•* i i -11l| I | £ I 1 II 1 « I ' «• s 1

!^l Jslil}!hiij'-H 2{!H^IIil'MlH'i!Hi!{!11 jlHlMilfiiiiP-1^iiili!il!%>

3-70

AR3U7I6

Page 86: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

*aV•+*u2s_ouX• c«Si!

•o 2SHS -*•*>.= ««•g «S .!_>O V<•>£1-1 ^— '•>s2S_ft> 1s isr08 S§

U

«2H*rf

"3M

£.Mt«j*.«J,

S•S3

w£*

1

.53<!

SI

|3

co«g°SGQ

3SS

B3£ia

cg

3

s

1 Measured

D

nb

Blank c

c

1oc0)m

X)£iffi£

1

— 5 S S 29"? 3^2 S?? """"SB t"??^ ^ 5 p "SK I§^ "sS S"S KR

C 4 C N oirC C M C M t o t o C M C M eoua

" CM 0 £ CO S 5§ oi (D o> h- ui *T

i *~ "" *"

m m m m m m

i ° I S "• B 5 1 1 1g TO oi f25 J^60 J? hJ

CM CM CM CM CM

X X X333" XXX 333 XXX 33 3~ XXX

_ w o> e» w an

! g j 2 5 ^ ^ 9 S S S ^ 9 ^ S S S ? ^ ^o d d d g g o d d °'§S o d d d^uj

T^ « T^ 03 T1 W

i• - « * t> «

0 O O O O O O

CD

D Z ) D D _ D D D D D

' S o d d o * d o d o o d d

1V V V V V , V V V

m m m m m m m m m

„, MtM ^ O C M CON

5 ! s 1 " S S i * 1 11 i^l"1!-!

»_ S S S 8 S 8I s •*' s w s "'to

com mm mm -> ->

i 1 1 . ii 1 1 ?j| g §sS CM CM CM N

j | § | ] |

lf« |ii ft-s ill |t§ l^i iff 5 iit<P -p E O tu ui <* fC m O UJ ui B ^ S O w ui *" S f? ~ O S f?

aS cl^^ cl^^ |Ex|SxKl 51 C S

•ii I•S-i -8 .

11 "" J 1 I -S £

«il ^ 1 Hit S i £.1 £ £ S£ £ c > c ? « 0 1 B «

III 1 f | g^f

"" " | 1 | | | |

HI ||| illm e o o i •!N!*!{J&.&.^

iil l!|o|||ill i i s - f a n o• « S s|^|ZZ^

Q; K tt X X X X

I

i i iiS »" 'S 'S"S s w "*f s. § I5 J 1 1}

-si I fillIII j ii!!I s 8" | 1 S" 1 1

r! ji-illl

fS B S S ft $> $ $ >

3-71

Page 87: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

itskoue05-5.1:

•o **

.S "• *T3e 5O V

T— 1 >— '

*": sfj g<5 IXQ L J

C3 g

C n

£C*M

ptisw**35"ees£>* '

1—

1J

1oO

T3QJ

8COCO

I08.ae

m

•0(U

11

Su<uu

ccm

oucCOm

"S

11

T3fljU

IJCcCDCO

c"cCt

|E

ISnOJS

incct

co co CQ CQ CQ mm- • r - l O N - 03 S g ^ - C O O ) T- 5 g ,- ,9- u, CM S 2.12 P"- to co ' T ~ o •"}• *fl- rt • * C M c o i n _ j ~ ~o d to r-' ^ in us tri uj o* EK tu uj ^ ^ ^ ^ LU UJ" T - C O - * " *f 10 h- CM o OCM c n r o c M t o c o

C M C M ^ " ^ T - C M ^ ° l - ^ C M " T " ico to to «* r- «

4= ^ J= £ ^

t> in co in ^r moc co cn oq co oq S;3 co' W CO T^ CO W

CO

01 co m mm1 » 8. 8 S g S S S S g f3"* CM co c n c M *- co t o t o

CM - CM

CO CO -» CO -5 CO CQ

- ^ • - m o g o ^ r c o t - « S o C M C O O * - o §j S f - O f * ^ C D T * t C O < • O C O T " C M O C O O Y "o co csi in - S o o T-* CM' °' o co co co to c\i J" g

eo in -v o o tov i~ to in CM T

«> _ <U _ SI _

t*^ O T- O 1- O T-c3

E

m

3 ^ - ' - -S-CO C M O O C O C O O l t O N .^ J K O c o t C M O i n c O o q t n * - ;•Sjco'eo' O CM co'^- O ^ T - ^ O ' O

V V

m m m m m m m m m«*. *. «_

— co o co OOQ m o o ) w f c S mom h - S SS3 *- -r- C O T V o o C D " " to t o o " "od d ^f in ui d d C M U J U I d 0" w w uio c o o O C O T * Q f l o i no «1 co o N. N w o tt>f n CM CM CM f

«•> . m T- m T- in T-cl to CD to

i

co_ m . coy j C Q " ^ m-j" m-i" —> —3S C O T - -*»- OT- in o m co CM— r«- in r-^co com c o c M o o c f i c o> ^ r o '•j-d irid •*' r^ in d o

O> g "°CB p ^Ol p

si s" | s" 5S 1» o ^» S E»

III ill I M ill" III i 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 i 1•o'S.^ ^ " S " * '°'^-.E S'w'w -0*0.^ S'w'iS'c-p'Q.3. ^-o'clI'f,™ i l l ? € m o E E " - § o l l l ™ ~ I S ™ ~S o m c j u i u j » c ? £ o i S i S S o S u i u i S S S o K a » o[II i 1 i 1 1 I | i i | i i

=' £ =g S IE g g

•D -D 13t- o n -eo> ra o s•n in 0 ^ JII ir II " -; «£22 J 1 |3622S g £ JS'SS** 5) S =£*! f !• 1 f I 2*1s s s I E * S g |o a a SJ Ti S ™ j? ^ ^ ^ £ tz c«»222 5 S * ^1^« C O « _ j S § p - g

Q -o e= oS*• • • 2 s g 1 £ S§11 1 1! Ill- « - i l l s $ 5N " « J " f i « S . S =

n n n J L ^ S ' l ^ ^ an u u 2 t S g > 5 3 «" s i i i § i y^Hi 1 1 1 1 1 : B> > > .i = g c Q a ^ fs s s S E £ ° z z ^Q.C1CL < U g * j £ u ) M U >

III S s !l i g « S i i i s l l l">«''- S I I w w w w^^c? •' = m x a s s£oz ri

-t03c r> "

(O c §S flf f 5JS S « «t * Si1 s I s_; £ re d. tl*? e > • e"2 S -i g S8 s u •? § ^ ^ r) E isr^^ * l ^ ^ f

— g" S = X ^ ^ ™S'raW § v C w ^^ 5 c ^ ^ S ^ ^E j j o T S ^ " " S ^•8^0 « s § § sQ."3S p **" fr "7 "gs"| • * 8 d i ^ 2 * 'fss| 1 S | fi | 2"rt.T' * o ' H - E r j I i J j - J IJJ|I s^||^-5^

iiiiiilliik. 0 „ . . „ « . ^

3-72

Page 88: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

?goUe«5

Continued

Metals) Train-

H "ri gfi jg— iA"« 3

H?(*!•

J2"s

PSV5

*Mrf

^

e,

'sraa

s1CD

E3ig,COS

S

1c

1cm

sE

m

g

31m

5nn1

1

g™to

gscroCO

1

§a:

-,- -.- -> -,- -,- -i -; -f -i

I s g g Sgg ?|S Sgg g. S? 5gg*"" ^O» T^oi *~ WT^

* x m x • .*

§ tri od to

CO

-j -,• ->-i T-i D -a 13

« c o S S S S S S ^ S S ^

V V

«> «o t o o i i n t M * 0 1 * * to10*1*

" ° i o § °RS °S?m K w *t tn **

O CO O <O O CO*i- K iB f-» 10 f- Co§ CN C> CN CZ) CJ O

a

® O) CO (OtO Sfi *" O { D t D O O r « »

g ^ T - 1 - v o ( O T - 1 . c s i o c " i o o

m m m c o m m m mO<*4 - « M * M , CO N

t e ^ i O(3o S f f ^ * ? O ^ ^ ^ ® O Q

T - * - nrj V - T - n ej *~ <r- nr{

^ M -, - ' ^ -

T- O> C*> T- T- T-°»j CO O (O CO§ S 85 S0}

m o m mm

| | S p 1 S! |" |

f l f l S I

|ti l|i Iff fli 11 1 I— lit flitiS <°ii r - - i S ^ i 1 1 EX

§ § a aK K. C S

AR3ll*7.l9\-

A A A

II!Stn O "S

«0 S „' 2

it i i ! Illl| | |g.| |||

Q Q Q Ti^g rg O £

IS S !l| i 1 1www £ f J gfl

? ™ "' i" * 1 1 « 1 i

ill 1 I 1* s s s•** •* ,E 5 S j| O O C3

MM « 8 S S g "B g "9J>a s. 1 1 1 1 I E III I ^ = °s 2 s s«z

3 ,;

1 w g Js a~ S *« 2 « "I* * I i1 1 * *

if 3 g 1

}?! ! ill!ill I ill PI|j-g||S|li|| S

|iii1|S's?;s? s|||||||||||

3-73

Page 89: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

-— •o0)us1e.£

_c•o £S L ^.E 2e 5o H j~ _jviH -

t* i

« ?3

IS^H

V)

"5S«B"wj>

"e5e>— '

ocN

|(01

Sodium

iIL

8CccD

Co"Gt8CraCO

13V)

s

m CQ co to CD coC M O T - » S S I ^ 0 r ~ ""So t ^ O h - M g

— ^ CO O ,n • • Ut t^- (O '11 ^— C O O 1 f-t iS «' S 2 ^ l l l U J ^ o d 5 ^ U J U I o W ^ 2UJ2 CO Is" UJO C M C O 52 5 * - C M C O g

CM CM T-" 0» -

_ — - —o PI •«- CO T- CO *-

ral

CO CO CO

S in en o o oo— 1 CO CO N; 1^ Ol CO> CM O CM Oi ' -^ CM

1 CO *- CM CM CM CM

R R " Rm. ,- T- ,- m. ^ T- *- CQ_ ^ ,_

0)

lank co

rrect

m

1O)

IcCOCO

o m r ) x x x s m o x x x ^ c o I ^ x x

1 S "° 8 t § ? V° S 299 S~° S 5 9o w u 6 d 6 u u o o d u

"-E ° S ° S ° Sg o o oECD

CD co_ co_•ol ~* ~* ~*S J l w o i T - en co en T3 <u 01 m CD f- oiinS HI ° ° °' °' °" °"S >

V V V

•o(U0<u

-XcreCO

g

nk co

rrect

nCD

C Q C Q C O C Q C O C O C Q C Q C Q

— C M C M V Woo - » - l O t O tt* 0 O - ^ C O O ) °0oj S c q c M p C O T T in co co C M " " i n o i n to"

C O C O C M C M C O C O C M « M C O C O C 4

- ^ - _ w ,, co m 01 r 01 coc] t*-_ r»- CM r CM •*gl in in 01 co Tf idEl 5 5 5col

CO CO CO CO CO COS? I g>| o r- o o o *-31 i to 01 co N. • co in<m >| ~ ~ CO CM CO CM

O) p O) p O) p

i t 1 1 1 15 S | i^l 5 5 S i'Sl fi1! its" » e 1 s g *" i 1 i s" s s i 1 i g"" = £ 8 c S S E ? § c S 2 E ™ 8 c Sg E ^ c § » 5 ^ E ' c § 5 5 ^H'c S SSi 0 S S 1 1 S!-o"ri S 1 1 So"S 1 1

E6:

i I | 1 i -IIK £C

?UJCM

CO

-,

co co 01 CM •g-^ •«- to" o o

X

in

•>3-93Ol t CO CO GOOl CM CM Ol CMO *- CM O o'

V V

^

1U«CM

o in in -y CM - f to Ol CO^ i-' CM Co' P3in CM r*-T- CM CO

fen c» S oi o>— x D 3 S => 3

f 1 1 1 9 III1 Illi 111pi pi

il S

3-74

AR3U720

Page 90: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.7-2. Analysis Results for MM5-MM (Metals) Train, Mercury Results—Blank Corrected

Mercury8

Run 5Rinse and filter, ugHNO3 implnger. ugFourth impinger.ugKMnO< implnger, ugHCI rinse, ug

Total, ug

Concentration, ug/dscmEmissions, g/sEmissions, Ib/h

Run 6Rinse and filter, ugHNO3 impinger, ugFourth impinger.ugKMnOj impinger, ugHCI rinse, ug

Total, ug

Concentration, ug/dscmEmissions, g/sEmissions, Ib/h

Run 7Rinse and filter, ugHN03 impinger, ugFourth impinger.ugKMnO4 impinger, ugHCI rinse, ug

Total, ug

Concentration, ug/dscmEmissions, g/sEmissions, Ib/h

Field Reagent BlankRinse and filter, ugHNO3 implnger, ugFourth impinger, ugKMnO4 impinger, ugHCI rinse, ug

Total . ug

Method Detection LimitRinse and filter, ugHNOj impinger, ugFourth impinger.ugKMnO« Impinger, ugHCI rinse, ug

Total . ug

Measured Measured values Blank correction Blank correctedValues usina 1/2 DL* amount total^

< 0.40 U 0.20 U< 6.51 U 3.26 U

0.38 J 0.38 J9.94 9.94277 277

291 X4 0 c 291 X4

96.2 X49.57E-04 X47.60E-03 X4

< 0.40 U 0.20 U6.42 J 6.42 J1.30 J 1.30 J327 3276.23 6.23

341 X4 0 c 341 X4

107 X41.06E-03 X48.37E-03 X4

0.69 J 0.69 J8.39 J 8.39 J

•= 0.21 U 0.11 U169 169

155 155

333 X4 0 c 333 X4

106 X41.07E-03 X48.46E-03 X4

< 0.40 U< 6.00 U< 0.20 U< 0.80 U< 1.00 U< 8.40 U

0.46111

9.4

MRI-Applied\R3(>20-:>8.S3B

" Mercury analysis performed by CVAA.b Blank corrected total Hg, = (Hg,,, - Hg,,,,) - (HgbK - Hgbh,,); per M29, Section 8.5.3.,eq. 29-8.

c Blank value less than MDL so the blank correction was conservatively set to zero." Using 1/2 detection limit for non-detect value from Table 3.7-2.Run 5 gas sample volume = 3.025 dscm. Stack gas flow rate = 597 dscm/min.Run 6 gas sample volume = 3.178 dscm. Stack gas flow rate = 590 dscm/min.Run 7 gas sample volume = 3.139 dscm. Stack gas flow rate = 603 dscm/min.

J indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the POL.U Indicates compound was analyzed but not detected (ND).X4 Sum includes ND and J values that represent less than 20% of the total.

3-75

flR3|!»72l

Page 91: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

•"O

13£ov,-

e

tenO

piC,2VIV)

M

1M2V

^

•1*

(".

—IE«2

o0)•2

13c£_0"SV)

EUl

CD.i£O2

•OCO

3

|Io

Imium

TJCOO

E_3

1-CDCO

E

ccCO

u'c0V:

it m in999Ul LU UlO CM COCD CD qT T CO

in •=9 S.ui aen ooo OCD

CD CD COo o oiii til liico in eoCO CO CM( 03 CO

CD ±:o colil •§en o

^

CD CD CO999Ul Ul UlSO COen co•* CO •*'

9 1Ul '0

s sin CD co999LU lil UJo T- inO CM I--T TT CO

g ITiii iCO .§O T-» 1

r*- t**- t*-\ r** c9999 3LU Ul Ul Ul .£CO CM CO CO £T-: T- H T J3

•* Tf Tf

999111 UJ UlCO N. l»-0) CD CO

9 §to" ^rf

CO CO COX X XCD CO CD999lil lii liien o irin T- ccin' CM co

9 1lil 'pCO 0)~ 'ccco c/:

O)m co r*- coc c c <jj3 3 3 >o: o: a: <

e-3OCD

tn CD in999UJ lil lilen o CMcq TJ- q•c CD CM

in oo .clii NCMmT

r~. f CD999lii iii liiCO CO r-Tf CM Oil

9 iLU =5co cocri E

CO CO CO999lil lil lilCO O CMo co incri co co

co p9 1LU =5CO O!>- COOO

X X XCO CO CDo o olil lil lil<r- O r-

0 Elil '«t- COT^ S

"5D.

CO CO CO999Ul Ul UlCO T- "Itt- co coCD CO CD

CO COO f)i a)UJ cco ro't D)to ci

2:T- CM CMX X XCD CO COI CO p9999 iUl Ul Ul Ul toin in in in coT- *- T-l T- §

ra5

CO CO CO999lii lii lii1" f*- COCO Tj- CCCO CD CO

CD C9 Sui —CDCDCO

COD)in co r- co

C C c m3 3 3 5

•"t M- tX X X•U- CO CO0 O Oi i iUl Ul Ul^ co i^in q qcri T -r

Tj- *t Tj-O O Oiii iii lii^ •<* CMin IT-; qCM T- T-

COo1UlCOq"

slilCOinT

X X XCD CO CDO O Oi i iUl Ul Ulco in coT— X— T—

CDolilCDJ

CM CM CM999LU lil lilco t— coCO CD toCM' CM CM

CMqlilcoCM

CO CO COo o olil lil lilco CM mCM CM •*

COqliloco

CO CO CO999Ul Ul Ult CM COin t c\icri iri in

(DolilCDCOCD

co co co999Ul Ul LUO «t O>in co crCO CO CO

COolil

CO

S-* <•9 9iii iii iii

CO O CMen o or co co

qlilSCO

COin CD h~ ccc c c a3 3 3 >a: K. (E <

£2

1rate.c

IAEUl

cuo

roCO_j

E

0s:O

Imium

uroO

E3=

o3m

E_3

COCQ

0'cCO1

CO •* TfO o qLU lil LUr co coCM CM •*^ T^ CM

Tf *-o "lil o.r^ O5 oin

m m m999lil lil lil•t- co coCM co en

in t:o rolil •§en ^

co co •* in

in in ino o olil lil lilco q cqCO CO CO

9 1Ul 'oCn *min QCO

in in ino o oi i iUl Ul Ulo) co en1- CO CM-

in >.O CI' OIH i5 1

CO h~ CD999lil lil lilo co oT en T-1

9 IUl .£°. Et— -3

co co coo o olil lil lilCM T- T-O> N- f-CO CO CO

S $ccl 55t-oo

CO CO COIX X XIin in in999lil lii iiiTt h- O1- co a•* T CM

9 1Ul co a°. 0)CO CO

0}rnm co N. coc. c c o53 3 3 >o: o: o: <

•*t m Tfo o olil lil lilo co om o coT-: in T-'

co co in999Ul Ul Ul•* CM N-co CM' i-1

CM CM CM999iii iii liiT- CO CDCM oq r-.[ CD CD

X X XCO CO CO999lil lil LUh-- cq inCO 00 00

CM CM CM999LU lil liloo T- coco q qin in in

r- CM CMX X Xin in in999lil lil lilCM CM_ CNr- T- T-

m m in999UI Ul Ulco co ent T- CNin in in

in co f-c c c33 =

^3OCO

•* olil NoCMT

CD p9 3ui =5t CO

^ 1CM p9 1Ul =aCO O

CO

CO p9 3UJ 'jo

CM COO «i fliUl ct COT- O)

10 ro

9 iUl InCM g^ 0>

CO

in c9 Sui —coCMin

CO0)COCO£

•*!• >* •*X X Xco co co999Ul Ul Ulo r»- toCD CO M-r- oo co

co •* t999lil lii iii•*!• t- COq q T-;CM en cd

CO9LUT—to

slilwCM_i-

X X Xin in ino o oLU lil lilCO CM COT- t— T-

mqlilCO^

999lil lil lil•* CM COCM T- v-CM CM CM

olilN.CM

CO CO CMO O Olil lil lilt o incri o> r

CMOlilCOqV

in in in999lil lil lilS S 2

inotil

r- •<* •*' in

CM CM CM999lil lil lilin m enoo co ccCM CM CN

CMOlilCOf-CM

co co c*999Ul Ul UlO) co enCM l>- •*»•to •*' in

COqlilinin

CD10 to f- c?c c: c CD3 3 3 >o: cc cc <

3o1 -• | | £

hi. *-* r- *CO O >g CM

1 0 ™ro CM q £T c int~. ro c w

« co •" "£75 2 K toro E £ coH J2 J2 o.P c c Pzz co co r;H « w S*- . CO <D 2£ S D. D.5CO § £ £ «

i sill_ Q 4= is >o z y> <u -3ro «_ 2 3 -o<" o ro co c•8 'c Q Q D•t; J2 en in <nro t/> co co o>C£ "55 *o T3 "D§ o "o t5 "o•5 " .E .S .£•i E E E Eh 3 3 3 r:Ul CO C ) CO" -J ^ k-*x Bx

3"76

Page 92: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.7-4. Metals Analysis QA Results

Spiked laboratory reagent blanks— %QA objective: 65-135%

Metal

AsBaBeCdCr

PbHgNiSeAg

AlSbCaCoCu

FeMgMnKNa

VZn

Front Half

106989192 .97

9310198954a

951011069595

9496978894

9892

Front HalfDup

108100919297

951039896T

961081099495

9596978698

9892

Back Half

9792899794

101NA969014"

10095919492

9396948998

9495

Recovery

Back HalfDup

9491899795

100NA979487

10091909492

9396949197

9397

Standard ReferenceMaterial (% Accuracy)QA objective: 75-125%

SRM#1

1249794102105

90NA10610090

NANANA10399

93NA101NANA

106100

SRM#1Dup

12111095104103

91NA1159398

NANANA10199

94NA101NANA

104102

Matrix Spike Recoveries for Hg (%)FrontHalf98

Dup

96

H2O2/HNO3Impingers

98Dup

96

KMnO4/H2SO4Impingers

99

Dup

99

HCI Rinse

102

Dup

106

' Recovery outside QA objective of 65-135%, as discussed in text of report:.

NA = Not applicable.

MRI-ApplioWUS20-28.S3B

AR3U7233-77

Page 93: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.8 Hexavalent Chromium Emissions Results

The hexavalent chromium content of the MM5-CR train samples was measured by ionchromatography (1C) employing a postcolumn reactor (IC/PCR), according to the EPA BIFmethod titled "Determination of Hexavalent Chromium Emissions from StationarySources," as specified in 40 CFR 266, Appendix IX, Section 3.2.

Analysis results for the train samples and calculated emission rates, where one-half thedetection limit was used for non-detect values, are given in Table 3.8-1, including theaverage emission rate for all three runs. If the blank values had been used to correct thedata, as allowed in the method, the blank corrected emission rates would be zero.

The MS and MSD samples showed recoveries of 79% and 78%, as noted inTable 3.8-1. Also, an independently prepared audit sample, at a concentration of11.3 ug/L, showed recovery of 101%, which met the QA objective of 90-110%.

MRI-AppliedR3620-28.S3C 3-78

Page 94: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

V*•4-4

"3VIcu&JOenM

1wE3

12JSU•4

JU*«sw0K•

eorn»ZeeH

2o'8EcuE3EBjzu4-*ccu1><OJI

1--~|"•"*

tr•ii-

(D £S1 ^fc J9 S E^W5=l^ ^

*"*

•g-

1»slco raSl.

2, cu "a •=•o>-g. p EJd p !r 0u 5 — OTj28§S

•t-oc c-SS|so*^

&E~1 3Is

Impinger Cr

*s co

ne. tj_Q-^S O)

S31o~siCQ =Lfl) — '

Xin=?LUCNTt

XCO9LU-3-tri

s.CDin

X• rin0

COCOCNT—

XCDCDO

CDSCN

XinCNo

Zloino'V

incnC£

XinoLU•«t

T—XCO9LUCNin

oCDin

XCOinc>

COCDCO

VXCNI--o

<*COCOCN

XinCMd

DoinoV

cocS.

XinoiLUO**'

X§|LUlT-J

inl•

COoCO

Xino'

Sr

T™1XCNn-d

CNCOCOCN

XinCMo

z>oindV

tct?

inoiLUT—

•*r

CO9LUCNincuo>(0

1

3 Do oin ind dV V

* £C COJS ffiCO ™x a§ i

_iQ§ISJ3

E1£Z_O

"6To8"Q.ECO

verage

of du

plicate analyses

on al

l s;

ising

Yz DL

for n

on-detect v

alues.

<t ->m o

iT~

COd).n

E

ample gas v

olume a

nd st

ack f

low f

ro

to

iZLClinto•o5'D.COCOc3o:E2«CD•Q.CO0)

£tcuCLCOcu*e~tfcot•ocCO>e5sen12

eswe

1ofit

e: M

atrix s

pike/Matrix s

pike

dupli

cate

"5z

21n

•til**0} to1£ tj•D Q)•tt "S°"?4-> C

idicates compound was analyzed bu

indicates a v

alue th

at is

based on no

L.'_ _

3X

3-79

AR3U725

Page 95: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.9 Volatile Organic Analysis Results for Feed, Bottom Ash,and Fly Ash

Feed samples were taken during each run in accordance with the Trial Burn Plan andanalyzed for specific volatile organic compounds, with the results as shown in Table 3.9-1.Samples of the bottom ash and fly ash were also collected during each of the test runs. Thesamples were analyzed for specific VOCs, with the results given in Table 3.9-2.

Surrogate recoveries are also shown in Tables 3.9-1 and 3.9-2. Several weresomewhat outside the QA objective range of 70-120%. However, the lowest recovery was60% and the highest was 185%. As noted in Table G7-2A of the Trial Burn Plan, surrogaterecoveries for Method 8260 analytes are generally in the range of 70-120%, so the range ofthe recoveries for the samples is not considered significant.

MRI-AppliedR3620-28.S3C 3-80

AR3U726

Page 96: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.9-1. VOCs in Feed Samples

Analyte

Benzene

Toluenec/s-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

£-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTetrachloroethene

EthylbenzeneTrichloroethene

m-/p-Xy\eneo-Xylene

Chlorobenzene

Surrogate Recovery (%)1 ,2-Dichloroethane-o1,,

4-BromofIuorobenzeneToluene-ck

Methoddetection Method

limit blank(ug/kg) (ug/kg)0.5

0.5 1.5 J0.3

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.2

0.4 0.5 J

0.3

0.4

-QA Objective 70-1 20%

Concentration (Mg/kg)

Run 5 Run 6 Run 7

Rep 1

-

19-

--

172.6 J

111

55

330

116

134"

60*

Rep 2

_

45 42 44- - -_

- - •

18 21 16

2.5 J 3.3 J 2.8 J

124 140 100

60 63 47

390 450 370

113 122' 113

131' 129' 128'

76 72 132'

' Surrogate recovery outside QA objective range of 70-120% (for ash samples).- Indicates that analyte was not detected (i.e., < MDL).J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.

MRI-AppliedR3620-28.S3C 3-81

AR3U727

Page 97: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3"aS |

Ug

o:

COc

CQ CQ CQ CQ

c M r . ^ . i i f ^ i t q i i i t c p i i t i i i i i i t i i i i i i i i c q 1 1 ' ^ CMN-1^-^ COO.

8.

01

o ffl

« bffl

I*tC

2Q CQ CQ . CQ

c q c M > | | o | i n l l | l | i n | | o 5 l t l 1 1 1 ' 1 1 i i i i i i i i i ^ -T-' co' CM d co W d

CQ CO CO CQ CQ-> -5 -J -3 - -j" -J

CQ mCQ

^ - h - i i o ' i n 1 ' ' ' 1 ' 1 ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' 1 ' ! ^ ' i t- i i i o> ' ' ' eoo.tnc

COe M c o ' l T - l c o l r ' ' ' c o ' ' ' l l l l l l l c n 1 1 ' 1

CO CO COr- CM CO

C\i C> CO O O

p co. ' ' p ' <n ' • ' ' ' M; ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i i i i i i i i i «fr co co coCM co CM' d co d j; £i <"

O3 CD CO

?s

— o>m S ,i

Im 10 -*4111!

^ ~r __J J «—* *«rf T- t t 1__J j V_rf \_ » ^ .J V « i_rf M »„I ^ 1—— ^ W t i_( »„J —— T—— l«il t—' MS T—— Vrf fc-H VP* *« *«* »—• *- *—* j

S •" §

ccfll ^ *~ "•— ni *1i U/ _ A. U— " .*-' A- *— t_ CJ v • i .1— " •_ >• l-< k. ^ *-T !-• -V *— 9t " HI «*S 37 *i\ « « IP.

IQm5oS<{3^'^'5oT-'c\i^'oi>m^'T-'JSiSi5^'m'S<>imcNi4ff£owto£___</^

CO COO O5

3-82

AR3U728

Page 98: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.10 Semivolatile Organic Analysis Results for Feed, BottomAsh, and Fly ash

Samples of the feed, bottom ash and the fly ash were collected during each of the testruns. The samples were analyzed for specific SVOCs, with the results given in Table 3.10-1and 3.10-2.

Surrogates spiked into the samples are also listed in Tables 3.10-1 and 3.10-2.Recoveries for these surrogates met the QA objective of 30-130%. Matrix spike sampleswere prepared in duplicate, for the feed, bottom ash, and fly ash, and the recovery for all theSVOCs are shown in Table 3.10-3. No QA criteria had been set up for these MS/MSDexcept for p-naphthylamine (30-130%). Most of the recoveries were good except for avery few of the compounds. Because of analytical problems with p-naphthylamine analysis,samples of the feed, bottom ash, and fly ash were sent to ECC for analysis even though the14-day holding time for bottom ash and fly ash would be exceeded by 2-4 days.

The ECC results for 3-naphthylamine are included in Tables 3.10-1 and 3.10-2. ECCresults given in Table 3.10-2 show that the concentration was below 55 ug/kg in both thebottom ash and in the fly ash. ECC surrogate recoveries were all in the acceptable range of30-130%. ECC also determined recoveries for a MS/MSD on the feed, bottom ash, and flyash. Those results are included in Table 3.10-3 and show that the ECC recoveries for thebottom ash were 83% and 79%; well within the acceptable range. MS/MSD recoveries forthe fly ash were lower (20% and 19%); both being outside the ECC limits of 25-100%.

MRI-App!iedR36:!0-28.S3C 3-83

AR3U729

Page 99: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.10-1. Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Feed Samples

1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichIorobenzene1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneBenzo(k)fluoranthene.Benzo(a)pyreneBenzoic acidNaphthalenePhenanthreneBenzo(a)anthraceneChrysenePhenolPentachlorophenolFluoranthenePyreneBenzo(b)fluoranthene

p-Naphthylamine (by ECC)b

Surrogate Recoveries (%) -2-FluorophenolPhenol-d52-ChlorophenoI-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4Nitrobenzene-d5°2-Fluorobiphenyl°2,4,6-TribromophenolTerphenyl-d14c

Detection limitbased on 1/5 lowest

standard3

(ng/kg)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000

(550) d

Feed ( g/kg)

Rep 1UUUUUUUU

2,410UUU

1,8301,430U

(2,450)

Run 5Rep 21,360UUUU

1,090U

1,080J 3,240

UUU

J 1,750J 1,450

U

NA

Run 6

J 1,200 JUUUU

J UU

J 1,280 JJ 2,700 J

UUU

J 1,550 JJ 1,250 J

U

(3,430)

Run 7

1,570 JU

1,280 J1,160 J1,350 JUU

5,1303,810 J1,710 JUU

4,550 J3,800 J1,150 J

(4,040)

QA objective (30-1 30%)51555759

61(35)65(52)70

73(126)

6871747677798390

65697174

73(42)77(46)82

89(123)'

65707273

75(44)77(60)83

89(118)

" Detection limit equal to 1/5th the lowest standard. This is based on the area counts for the lowest standard, which weresufficiently high to enable detection and estimated quantitation of compounds whose area counts are 1/5 as high asthose for the lowest standard.

b Samples of feed were sent to ECC by MRI, and were analyzed within the holding time of 14 days.c Surrogate recoveries shown in parenthesis are for ECC analysis of samples.d ECC detection limit for p-Napthylamine in feed samples.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQLNA - Not analyzed

Note: A method blank was analyzed, but all analytes were non-detect.

MRI-AppliedR3«20-28.S3C 3-84

AR3U730

Page 100: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.10-2. Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Ash Samples

PhenolBis(2-chloroethyl) ether2-Chlorophenol1 ,3-Oichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene2-MethylphenolBis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether4-MethylphenolW-Nitroso-di-n-propylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nttrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzole acidBis(2-chloroethoxy) methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methy!phenol2-MethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NltroanilineDimethyl phthalateAcenaphthylene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene

DetectionLimit:

Based on1/5 loweststandard •(pg/kg)BottomAsh/

Fly Ash140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70

Bottom ash (ug/kg)

Run5

Rep. 1UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

2,060 JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Rep. 2UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

2,110 JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Run6

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

3,110 JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Run 7 .

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

250 JUUUU

. UUUUUUUUUUUUU

Flyash(ug/kg)

Run5

Rep. 1UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Rep. 2UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Run 6

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Run 7

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(continued on next page)

MRI-AppliedR3S20.28.S3C 3-85

AR'3ll*73

Page 101: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.10-2 Continued(Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Ash Samples)

DetectionLimit •(ug/kg)Bottom

Bottom ash (ug/kg)

Run 5Ash/Fly Ash Rep. 1

2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NrtrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-Dinitrotoluene2,6-DinitrotolueneDiethyf phthalate4-Chlorophenyl phenyl etherFluorene4-Nitroaniline4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol/V-Nftrosodiphenylamine4-Bromophenyl phenyl etherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthreneAnthraceneDi-n-butyl phthalateFluoranthenePyreneButyl benzyl phthalate3,3'-DichlorobenzidineBenz[a]anthraceneBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateChryseneDi-n-octyl phthalateBenzo[jb]fluorantheneBenzo[k]fluorantheneBenzo[a]pyrenelndeno[1 ,2,3-cd]pyreneBenzo[g,/J,/]perylene

p-Naphthylamine (by ECC)b

140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70140/70

(16/9)

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(U)

Rep. 2UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(NA)

Run 6 Run 7 .

Fly ash (ug/kg)

RunS Run 6 Run 7

Rep. 1 Rep. 2UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(U)

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(U)

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

(U)

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu •Uuuuuuuu

(NA)

UUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

(U)

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuu(U)

Surrogate Recoveries (%)-QA Objective 30-130%.2-FluorophenoIPhenol-d52-chlorophenol-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4Nitrobenzena-d5e2-Fluorobiphenyt°2,4,6-TribromophenolTerphenyl-d14c

76838186

86(62)86(68)86

82(94)

6771697377727273

64696871

77 (83)72(90)76

69(90)

6470687278(110)72(71)7372(97)

64706970

77 (82)72(88)72

76(120)

6066646775707175

66727073

78 (53)72(71)71

77(112)

68747374

80(66)75 (81)73

79(116)

a Detection limit equal to 1/5th the lowest standard. This is based on the area counts for the lowest standard, which weresufficiently high to enable detection and estimated quantitation of compounds whose area counts are 1/5th as high as those forthe lowest standard.

b Samples were sent to ECC after receipt at MRI. Thus, the 14 day holding time was exceeded by 2-4 days.c Surrogate recoveries shown in parenthesis are for ECC analysis of samples.

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.J Indicates an estimated value, above the detection limit, but below the PQL.NA Not analyzedNote: A method blank was analyzed, but all analytes were non-detect.

MRJ-AppliedR3620-28.S3C 3-86

AR3U732

Page 102: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.10-3. Matrix Spike Recoveries for Feed, Bottom Ash and Fly Ash

Feed Bottom ash% Recovery % Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%) (QA Objective 30-1 30%) .MS MSD MS MSD

PhenolBis(2-chloroethyl) ether2-Chlorophenol1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene2-MethylphenolBis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether4-Methylphenol/V-Nitroso-di-W-propylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nrtrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzole acidBis(2-chloroelhoxy) methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-MethylnaphlhaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NitroanilineDimethyl phthalateAcenaphthylene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene

79 63 85- - 77- 75- 7781 65 78_ _ gt

88 71 7965 .

- - 80- 63— — 71- - 76- 83- - 89

75- - 29"35 27* 5*- 79

7691 74 8193 75 89- - 48- - 79- - 83- 90

16"- - 65- - 93- - 83- - 77

90- - 85

76- - 91

(continued on next page)

92888384855'877085857582899985401068986899756889310018"7311195891029585101

Fly ash% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%)MS MSD82818179805'8275846773778892824917*8177838659828491377489868089868292

84848483846"8577908574828595804116'8482848965848795357986918495919097

MRI-AppHcdR3620-28.S3C

AR3U7333-87

Page 103: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.10-3 Continued(Matrix Spike Recoveries for Feed, Bottom Ash and Fly Ash)

Feed% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%)MS MSD

2,4-Dinrtrophenol4-NftrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-Dinitrotoluene2,6-DinitrotolueneDiethyl phthalate4-Chlorophenyl phenyl etherFluorene4-Nitroaniline4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolA/-Nitrosodiphenylamine4-Bromophenyl phenyl etherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthreneAnthraceneDi-n-butyl phthalateFluoranthenePyreneButyl benzyl phthalate3,3'-DichlorobenzidineBenzfajanthraceneBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateChryseneDi-n-octyl phthalateBenzo[b]fluorantheneBenzo[k]fluorantheneBenzo[a]pyrenelndeno[1 ,2,3-cd]pyreneBenzo[g,/y]perylene

P-Naphthylamine (by ECC)

------------—86115--123127--129-105-959392——

(30)

--—----------7383--95103--99-86—797676--

(38)

Bottom ash% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%) .MS MSD367510986849790929979918891749084981099690699210891898484829189

(83)

4987125979210810210310891100961008499921091241089980102117102101851029410198

(79)

Fly ash% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%)MS MSD5467108858294899310283908890708586951061009067859990918184838783

(20)b

58771159287102949710888949395759093103113106"95749311398988597919592

(19)"

Surrogate Recoveries (Ve)-QA Objective 30-130%2-FluorophenolPhenol-d52-chlorophenol-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4Nttrobenzene-d5 c2-Fluorobiphenyl2,4,6-Tribromophenol cTerphenyl-d14c

60707070

77(76)78

83(89)89(116) •

52575859

66(70)67

73(88)80(105)

65706870

75(73)73

74(103) «72(111)

69757375

82(82)80

83(101)79(107)

67727170

77(89)70

71(99)72(125)

68767474

81(84)77

78(91)78(109)

a Recovery outside QA objective range of 30-130%.b Recovery outside ECC limits of 25-100%.c % Recovery shown in parentheses is for surrogates spiked into samples by ECC for p-Naphthylamine analysis.- Not spiked because not a target analyte in the feed.Note: Spike level was 50 ug equal to 10,000 ug/kg for feed.

Spike level was 15 ug equal to 1,000 pg/kg for bottom ash and 500 ug/kg for fly ash.ECC spike level was 6,670 ug/kg for p-Naphthylarnine in feed.ECC spike level was 833 ug/kg for p-Naphthylamine in bottom ash and fly ash.

MRI-Appli«iR3620-28.S3C _,_ 3-66

AR3U731*

Page 104: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.11 PCDD/PCDF Analysis Results for Bottom Ash and FlyAsh

Samples of the bottom ash and of the fly ash were collected during each of the test runsfor 2,3,7,8-substituted dioxins/furans. The extraction, cleanup, and analysis for thesedioxins/furans were done in accordance with EPA Method 8290. Analysis was performedby high resolution gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectroscopy with selected ionmonitoring. The 2,3,7,8-substituted PCDD/PCDF results for the bottom ash and the fly ashsamples are given in Tables 3.11-1 and 3.11-2. Duplicate analysis of samples from one runis included in the tables.

Recoveries for the laboratory surrogates spiked into the samples are included inTables 3.11-1 and 3.11-2. The recoveries were all within the QA objective of 40-120%.Table 3.11-3 provides QC results pertaining to the D/F analysis of bottom ash/fly ashsamples, consisting of MS/MSD and a laboratory control spike. Recoveries for thelaboratory control spike were good; all within a range of 72-112%. Recoveries for the MSand MSD were also good, in the range of 70-113%.

The 2,3,7,8-substituted dioxin/furan results given in Tables 3.11-1 and 3.11-2 wereused to calculate the 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentration using the 1989 EPA factors.These results are presented in Tables 3.11-4 and 3.11-5.

MRI-ApplredR3620-28.S3C 3-89

Page 105: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.11-1. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Results for Bottom Ash SamplesConcentration (ng/kg)

AnalvteDioxins2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD

Furans2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1, 2,3,4 ,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF1, 2,3,4 ,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF

Labeled Analogs (\QB)13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1 3C-1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD13C-OCDD

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF13C-1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HDCDF

MethodBlank

<0.0368 U<0.138U<0.798 U<0.0711U<0.0874 U0.786 J1.62J

<0.0578 U<0.105U<0.102U<0.0557 U<0.0455 U<0.0584 U<0.0623 U<0.0691 U0.752 J0.481 J

IQS

7064658172

665865"67

Run 5

<0.0710U<0.149U<0.140U<0.125U<0.153U

6.14J36.8 J

<0.0872U<0.136U<0.133U<0.0601U .<0.0491 U<0.0630 U<0.0672U<0.0506U<0.582U<0.0996U

Run 5Duplicate

<0.0431 U<0.133U0.209 J0.887 J1.12J6.85 J44.8 J

0.302 J<0.0687 U<0.0670 U<0.0470 U<0.0384 U

0.316 J<0.0525 U<0.0615U<0.0708 U<0.0758 U

Run 6

O.149U<0.159U<0.133U0.820 J0.860 J10.3J68.3

<0.0864 U<0.132UO.129U<0.0850 U<0.0694 UO.0890 U<0.0950 U0.765 J0.444 JB1.25JB

Run 7

<0.113U<0.160U<0.130U<0.116U

1.35J7.20 J43.0 J

<0.0913U<0.110U<0.107U<0.0604U<0.0493U<0.0633U<0.0675 U

0.61 3 J<0.0870U

0.621 JB

Surrogate Recoveries (%) — QA objective 40-120%

5960717370

54538962

5756687063

53528361

5352657261

49508861

5656677963

54538065

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQL.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.

MRI-Appli«dR3«20-28.S3C 3-90

AR3U736

Page 106: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.11-2. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Results for Fly Ash SamplesConcentration (ng/kg)

AnalvteDioxins2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD

:urans2,3,7,8-TCDF1 ,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF

.abeled Analoas (\QS)13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD130-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD13C-OCDD

130-2,3,7,8-TCDF130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF130-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF

MethodBlank

<0.0368U<0.138U<0.798 U<0.0711U<0.0874 U0.786 J1.62J

<0.0578 U<0.105U<0.102U<0.0557 U<0.0455U<0.0584U<0.0623 U<0.0691 U0.752 J0.481 J

7064658172

66586567

Run5Run 5

Duplicate

<0.0671U <0.0887U<0.141 U<0.110U<0.0980 U<0.120U

3.73 JB6.01 JB

0.0763 UO.0884U0.648 J1.19J0.837 J0.630 J

<0.0669 U2.95 J

. 0.456 JB<0.161 U

IQS Surrogate

5349565754

51485552

<0.149U0.202 J0.478 J<0.189U

4.24 J5.71 JB

0.925 J<0.159U<0.155U

1.15J0.269 J0.998 J<0.114U

3.15J<0.137U

2.78 J

Recoveries

5250666966

49486561

Run 6

<0.104UO.185U<0.0994 U

2.35 J<0.109U

9.59 J9.61 J

0.731 J<0.0916U

1.08J1.53J1.29J1.33J

<0.0818U4.62 J1.32JB5.19J

Run 7

<0.0801 U0.621 J1.12J3.33 J4.35 J12.6J9.53 J

<0.0541 U0.505 J

<0.0838 U1.62J1.20J

<0.0834 U<0.0890 U

3.06 J1.09JB3.55 J

(%)— QA objective 40-120%

5253636460

49506557

6859596054

66566253

U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.J Indicates an estimated value; above the MDL but below the PQLB Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5 times the blank value.

MRl-AppIicdR3620.28.S3C 3-91

AR3U737

Page 107: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.11-3. QC Results for 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Samples

AnalvteDioxins2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD

Furans2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1 ,2,3,4 ,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF1,2,3,4.6,7,8,9-OCDF

.abeled Analoas (IQS)13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD13C-OCDD

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDFISC-I .SJ.S-PeCDF130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF

MatrixSpike*

(% Recover^

7082868295102113

108929172637263108102111

IQS Surroqate

7064737961

636410270

MatrixSpike Dup.*(% Recover^

7586928611296113

1009110172Q27570106

Laboratory control spike% Recovery

QA objective 50-1 50%

72828881112101107

9497101999310397110

101 106104 108

Recoveries (%) — QA objective 40-120%

6763596358

54578556

5959616562

56556157

Matrix spike of bottom ash.

MRI-AppIiedR3S2D-28.S3C 3-92

AR3U738

Page 108: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

£o•cOS

<?WONeoON1— 1"'••'

"£sce.c<;So•4-rf-taJ

I-

<2

•W

3CM

£•2s"S£"3crW

A

4.n1*

»-Hj—<•f>p2

S

C3

•iftr raUJ £.

•g —

|I

(Oc3o;

a3Qc3

£ ocr 6)UJ S

T33 "3to -L(0 g>a> cS ""

* f3 *O" D)UJ C

S,**

1 f•J JK>58 |><u £,5

C3a:

. *£?•S ,ger >"J _*

•g _

If<u £.

-,:'=jtrUJ -Q. toUJ U_

1f5

O O O O l r t C M C O O O O O O O O T - C O O < D - « -co s- •<«• co o CMT- O O O Oodd P Po o

Z»3Z3Z)-o-> Z>r>3Z)3r)Z> ID00c o o o c o i n o o c o o t ^ T i - c o c o i n c o ot-*— <D CO T- CO CM fn' ^-T-OOOCOf^.^— h*CM

d d d d P d d P P P P d P dV V V V O V V O O O O O

V V V V V V

o o o o o c o c o o o o o o o o m finCM (D 0 00 <O f CMeo oo T- <o N. f •«-O O Q 0 O O Oo do o P oo o o

_ ~. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mm333-3-3-5 3333333-3 -3-1O ) O c o o o c o c o ^"CMO)o^ooin ^infincocMtDQjo' t o c o c M i n c n c n i n c o fCMd o' o' d d P d d P P P P o" dv v v o v v o o o o

V V V V V

o o G) r^ CM in oo CM o o o o (o o o o oO 00 T- CO f O T-<N OO T- CD f CO COo o o- o o o od o' d d o' d

co co o co T- oo — j: o cor^-r^-oot— CM*— oinS^^ C M C O _ J / X ^ . C O t D C D ^ C O C O i n C D N-S-. d d d d °. P P P o' P °. P P

CD V CD D CD CD CD CD CD DV V V V V V V V V

O O O O O f O O O O O O O O O O O OT- CDto coo od d

O O J O i n c O T f O O C M ( O C O T - T - O C M C D CMtD»- «* ^r CM in •«-; JQ r > - cocooa5cor~-o ooa>P d d d d ro °° P d d P P P P P . d Po v v v v o v v o o o o o v ov v v v v v v v

T- 0 IT) T- T- 0in T— -c— <r* o o T— o m v - t— T— T— o oo•«- o' d o' o' o' d d d d d o' o' d d d d

So £ £ aa o a g o u. u. u. u. g go

Q^XIIoq^S; Q ^ ^ X r X X o b cieo"l-p 06 N." h«." oo" CD" (o" h oo oo N." N-" fv." oo" <D" N-" <D"

gl oo_ r»T r_ co_ NT "<f wi oo t~-~ h <o <o_ f1-" TC" f"•55! h - C O C O C O C O C O C O ( D J N - C O ^ t C O C O f C O C O COCO.2 co CM" CM CM" CM" CM" CM" 3 co" CM" co CM" CM" co" CM" CM" CM" CM"

CMd

COinCOo'

^oCOd

CM

Sod

1£JoOS(D'3

Q

«co"CM""S£

0)

S 1o> >C Jbtfo _j c"f? ?Tf ——(U nOT. «£CM" ^ •o "g o E2 t3 "53 '*••r* <D ins|||

•- "3 5 tou> <D g). o £ c»

KJ <U O

OJ t-0 •—• "<5 .. ®O C Q) "^*• <D 3 (DC (O CO >(D (0 > T5(0 * "g £co c~ co co= g E S5 S-'f e^ U (0 £ y

^ "§• 1Z — — -^ i0 |

3-93

AR3U739

Page 109: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Iso"S3esto

WONoo'O\

W]

"E1enJSV5

^>{^)"<

•2V)•*•*"3<G04VI

—*«*5DwQ

00r«J*

rf

2«tjj«H

c3o:

COc

a3Qinc3OH

incIE

5 "5>D" D)HI £.

•o"> C5= 9*8 "&<u E,^

• "3ET O)

""

TJOJ -»3 .S1co fP ^—

,> D)

I^T C^ • — •

"8*— O)

8 |Is

= 1& c

"*"

Is3 CO |)

5 •E

.2:CTill *-.w 2. oD- CO111 U-

iCDC

o T- CN co m CD co o c o o c N o o o c o o mT - r - c o c o c N i n in CDCN oomCO T— CO ^" *— O) CN T— T— COT— CO0 d 0 d d g g 0 0 g g g

0 O

- x _ , _ _ , _ . C OD-j-3-i-j-i-j D-jD-j-3Z)Z)-i-j-3o CN T— co co in ^ f o c o c o c N c o o o o i n

o' do o' oV V V V V

O O O i n O O T — T — O O C O O > C O O C N C N O >co inco co T3-mcNco COCOT-CN C3> o> N> in T— T~ T™ ^ T— ino g 8 § d d d d g g 8

o o

mSlO'^ftOOJO'" T— ( D O O O O O C O C O C ^ C ^ O

00 O) CO 3 IO CO CO ™" tO If5 C CO **r" CO CO '"'5 5 S « 5 » « 5 § ---'-'§ - «v v d v d d

V V V

O O C N C O O T ^ - T - i n o o m o j c o o i n o c oON. CNN- CN T-CD05 T- N.CN Tf •'tf' in C7> T— CN C3> CO CNOO OO O Q O O O Od d d P d d d d °.

0 0

3 U -, -, 3 -, SO -.^^-.-.-.^..o-,00 f CO N« GO CN N. CN IO in T— CO O) T T"" CO N"OO T"- CN f T— .j C3) T~ CN O> T— grj T— - |P d o' d d d d o' d o' d do v v v v v v

°N-O C N T - C O C O o>incoco C O T - O O C O CNrro o ,— ; t-\ o o o od P d d d Po o

r)DDZ>r)™™ DD-i-j-j-jD-j^Z)T - T - O O O C O T - c o r r o o c j > N . o c 3 > i n c o T —N- ^ T— oo CN N> O CO OO T— CO CO CO O) in CO

d v v d v do' o' vv v v v v

T- T- *~ ° T-10 T-T-T-T-T~T~°

T- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

g§ fe "- Q

(-^OON-"N^OOCO"CO~ H^ooooN^NrN^oo'coN^co"J2I oo N." •»*" co" N." r" r" <i>\ oo N-" N." xr" CD" co" N a-" s-" tf•5; N." co co co" co" co co m N." co t " co" co" tj- co co" co co'.2 co" CN" CN" CN CN" CN" CN" 3 co CN" co CN" CN" co CN" CN" CN" CN"

COCOT-

CO

in00

o'

N.18d

f _ Q

_^

6coOc7v\

7,8-TCDD Equ'M

coCN8

• £

4

^5 1O) >

1 -j|S g2°l «|* «f «1 111S ^ n in^ CD -^ Cf 2^5> O-l*m CQ co-ti 5 -Si_ 3 COHI J2 (j) 0)

^ c3£ °>e ^ « oS * S cI ^-s-s•Q co .. *O c * —~ CO 3 toSen co >^ 2 > "0•76 5 "o 2™ -a.2 =i8 § g co2 oj ®(0 CL tp C> C Q) 4-/ts P =^§ e (o5 g! Ill0 ° ° ° §O TT *=j *g" 10z 1^-g 11 JZ D-jCQ fl

3-94

AR3|l*7i*Q

Page 110: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.12 Herbicides Analysis Results for Feed, Bottom Ash andFly ash

Samples of the feed, bottom ash and fly ash collected during each of the test runs wereanalyzed for herbicides. The samples were extracted with alkaline acetone/ether,derivatized with diazomethane to form the methyl esters and analyzed using GC/ECD.

The analysis results are summarized in Tables 3.12-1 and 3.12-2, which include thesurrogate recoveries. One of the surrogate recoveries was somewhat low (40%) for thefeed in Run 6, and for the bottom ash in Run 7 (45%). Both surrogates were somewhatlow for the fly ash in Run 7 (37% and 47%) and one was low in Run 6 (39%). Also, alaboratory control spike (LCS) was prepared and analyzed for herbicides. The recoveries,shown in Table 3.12-3, were generally good, except for 2,4-DB at 22% recovery andDalapon at 33% recovery. Analysis for herbicides has historically shown considerablevariability in such recovery data.

Samples of the feed, bottom ash, and fly ash were sent to ECC for Fenac analysis, eventhough the 14-day holding time would be exceeded, after analytical problems wereencountered in the MRI analysis for Fenac, as noted in the Risk Burn No. 1 report. ThoseECC results are included in Tables 3.12-1, 3.12-2 and 3.12-3. The ECC results met all therequired QC criteria.

MRI-AppliedR3620-28.S3C

Page 111: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

C5CO

"8£.2

u'•Suao

&iCO

AH

T30)0)U-

15

cs

c:3o:

(Oc(§

incl§

|1

§3•o °0)i

1o)

SD)3L

1

i!

•* 5*7 *Zn O)0 3.X~"

8t(DC

m^-i>-<ocNo>CM<ooo o o> co in^52i— c>iirioco(NQ§ Q mor^

*~ V o" o" N."CO T-

V

CD CO (NrD->->-->r)-)-j3XXn'«tcvicp(oo5is-.«poo o "otocoV " **" \y fr\ T"" CO O CD " «_. ^

V *~ V O" O" OJ"in T-V

DQ_ CQ CO (N

ino>mr-t--(Du-)tooo o t^ r T-fMCDfMCM. T-^JCJ^-OO T- OOCON-

~ V eo" o" N."^ V

inincD<O(Noin(Ooo o OJODO<v"v'<i/'v'cOlv>^/l£l§O ° «D(DO3

V CN" m" v

u, m <o. <p <R p « <°. o o g SSCM in _

g

I

3"o S5 oi«Sf 0« fl) o2 « LJO o. LtJ•° o o >

O tt ® "*""& a ^l&sa. = « !.n -^ «4^^

QDinio0-^— ro^R" co g^*"*"

CN CM" ci CM" Q Q Q Q 5 5 u. (0

•5 5 = * * c-Ba|s| ||lvilil . 111.

ll lllillIIIa & OCQ-jX X X

3-96

Page 112: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

aS

<uT3

a

D

CO

to

U.

D

illo^o— -D «° SQ « •« *

m_ CDinin'S-tooomcDOo o 'r'jL CM......„._. jee o ^^^

v CM" m" vv vffl

DDZ) DloincotDr^-omtDoo o

-v CN inV

V

-fDDDDD DinincDCOCMomcDOo

v CM'm" vv v

co in co cq (o p in (o o o o

V

13oh-invv o o

V VV=o

IA * 1-. _ _ — _ - D O O

jg ^ J=> CM rxi rJ <D iri CM rvi O Ov o'o"V V

inin<D<ocMoincooo

v

O

Eg'8|a> cif 8,

m -*IJ "*~ T3

S*3^ " * «? »

inincococooincooo *o

<l)

CM" in" oh~in 2"

O

^~ SlUo

Q Si o >»n O — O £•**• *>i .» "S u. k..9 i£ §:^ I'>, .£. W.

in

CM

15 8

S!*•* c

111» 2 o

3 C <0

8-T!

CL

• <

J M' .fSr<a g -5<U 5^

i I SId) ECO?I •fl) VST Q)

8 co g « »= fe = <°<° ° "5 toS « 8."

o o>T_ «u '

f S |ji^_ w/ «t— —' *v ~— ^ «* _j^

HI ifSH!11-j i®jj.gn!8

— " ** Jo3 C S- _cW(0_J U 9 (0U 5-5 TO 4= .« *Smill

(D (0 <0 <0 i— (Do y y y 9 yO T3 '-O TJ "-D S =0

~~~I ~ |( O J D o D C D - j X D S

S

3-97

Page 113: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.12-3. Summary Table for Herbicide Laboratory Control Spike b

LCS

Analvtes2,4-D2,4-DB2,4,5-T2,4,5-TPDalaponDicambaDichloropropDinosebMCPAMCPP

Fenac (by ECC)

Surrogates (% Recovery) — QA2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acidTriclopyrTriclopyr (by ECC)

Spike Level(ua/ka)1,0001,0001001002,5001001,000500

100,000100,000

(1,200)

Objective 50-1 60%

Cone. FoundCua/ka)63322071758149570639450,40069,600

(1070)

Recovery(%)6322'717533"9571795070

(89)

104102(106)

a Indicates recovery below 35%, although no specific objective has been established.b Laboratory control spike was done on a previously analyzed fly ash sample; not one of the fly ash

samples from Risk Burn No. 2.

D Indicates compound identified in an analysis at a secondary dilution factor.

Note: MRI sent the samples of feed, fly ash and bottom ash to ECC, who analyzed them for Fenacand performed analysis of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, with results as follows:

% RecoveryECC Limits: 35-150%

MS MSPBottom Ash 86 127Fly Ash 60 80Feed 99 101

MRI-Appli«UU620-28.S3C 3-98

Page 114: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.13 Metals Analysis Results for Feed Samples and TCLPMetals in Bottom Ash, Fly Ash, and Scrubber WaterSamples

Samples of feed taken in each run were analyzed for six metals (As, Be, Cd, Cr, Pb andHg) by acid digestion and analysis by ICP (or CVAA for Hg). Those analysis results arepresented in Table 13.1-1. This table includes recoveries for the LCS and for the MS/MSD,all of which met the QA objective of 70-130%.

Samples of the bottom ash, fly ash, and scrubber water were collected during each ofthe test runs. The samples were extracted using EPA SW846 Method 1311 and thenanalyzed for the TCLP metals (Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, and Se), with the results givenin Table 3.13-2.

Table 3.13-2 includes results for the extraction fluid blank and recovery data for alaboratory control spike and for a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD). Theserecoveries were all within the QA objective of 70-130%.

It may be noted in Table 3.13-1 that non-detect values for scrubber water samples areconsiderably higher than for the ash samples. In fact, the non-detect values for Cr, Pb, andAg exceeded the PQLs given in the Trial Burn Plan. The reason for this is that the scrubberwater samples had a level of total dissolved solids that necessitated dilution down to a levelthat could be tolerated by the analytical instruments.

MRI-AppliedR3«20-28.S3C 3-99

Page 115: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.13-1. Metal Concentration in FeedConcentration (ug/g or mg/kg)

Analysis by

FeedRun 5Run 5 dup

Run 6Run 7'

Method Blank

Spike Recovery (%) -LCSMatrix spikeMatrix spike dup.

ICPAs

7.04 J7.66 J

6.02 J3.49 J

< 2.88 U

ICPBe

0.690.70

0.540.76

< 0.03 U

ICPCd

<0.21 U< 0.22 U

0.35 J< 0.24 U

<0.23 U

ICPCr

26.626.6

21.126.7

< 0.32 U

ICPPb

37.736.0

33.638.1

<1.89U

CVAAHa

0.52 J0.25 J

< 0.20 U0.26 J

< 0.20 U

QA Objective 70-1 30%9299101

100100100

105102101

105101101

102103101

948786

U Indicates compound was analyzed but not detected.J Indicates an estimated value, above the MDL but below the PQL.B Indicates that the value is not greater than 5X the blank value.

MRI-AppKedR3620-28.S3C 3-100

AR3U7l*6

Page 116: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

^*Jj5hi0)*•*§C/2

"8cs1E

11•*•»oMC

1otaJ

guo~cc15sCM

UHr4•coPOo>1r*H

3CO

Concentrati

^O

1o

<<^

o

Q-g

if0

Q_O

<ULO

D.g

£

Analyzed

o03

.aa.

aI

0

T3O

COm

<

D

333 3OOO in -^ in <-> 0 <-> O CD W h-cococo r- a 13 co ° m °° o i- CMwww o5 P- cococo w 1-1-1-V V V V

wSS wo o o o °.PP o ^J2",r;cv!cN O O M - N WWW W !I!Z!I~ww coinco www pj 1-1-1-V V V V v

3 3 3 3 3 3 3OOO OOO mtni^ O N i - WCM CM W W C M C M C O C O - ^ O3OOodd odd irico'i— *•* 1—1—v v v v v v v

333 3 3 3 3www eoeo-e- ooo w wco-*cococo' •& co co CMCM'CM co o > N h -V V V 1-1-1- C O C O C O v

V V V

-> -3 3 3 3 3

^"° s § 8 §SS d 05°0>

C Q C D C Q IBCQCQ D3CQCQi--«ro r--o>O3 cocotn CD Smmwc»i- co-i-o 1-1-0 •* cnt n c oWI-T- 1-1--^ -r-i-1- i-

3 -3 -) 3gn-o ooo ooio § 8o>o* i t* oo r** co co CD * ~y1""1^ COCO Wl— y

s?333 33-3 -3-33 3 «C O C O C O COCOjQ ^.gjO CO " O C 3 5 C 3 5V V V V V i - oj^05 V g O O I ^ h -

CD CO CO v o^o.siO<j

. Om ' D— — o? 3QQ o* °&

^ "O ^ CD CD

%»«K' » «„!»«,,, ! i fl•^ccc,, C C C Q C C C ,0 o c o « £|iririr^iririrSi^'E'^ "S ^ij52£ < g £ J2o i- o x '5.ID u. tn ui in

x:tocoCD£"5

CO

to.1ow.to .m

= -:~ COqs T~C oasO Q>

if0 "

2 !=

^ "°

"5 Z>. cCD CDS3 .s® d .0 °- «"

^ o r- 15to p 4= >CO t- > *s« O > ;T3 (0 — m813 "g^S£ CD ^ £Q.= ) JD *-

® ® -DQ W

to *~ ? tiCD W 3 £ t!Q.O -Q 0 Oc C3 ^3 njm X §,"§ 0)to br _: CD*" O

^ £,"& to § .S2"c c 5 ~° 33 ~ O T3 •" "CO

rrt "1" C >to i o § .£ coto m ». Q-W £C O P CO *-••B J3 § § .C«5 <S Q. co to to yc: en to o o « Bg -Q_ .X CB CO CO S

iiiiii 1g:

co a 3 -3 CD 1s

3-101

AR3U7U7

Page 117: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.14 Feed Characteristics

Feed samples were taken in each run and sent to Galbraith Laboratories for ASTMmethod analysis for total solids, moisture, ash, heating value, and chlorine content. Resultsof those analyses are presented in Table 3.14-1.

As part of the above analysis, MRI submitted performance evaluation samples (PES)for analysis. Those results are given below.

Results for Performance Evaluation Samples

Heating value (Btu/lb)Chlorine (%)

Ash (%)

Measured value

14,330

33.72

4.77

True value13,463

33.3

4.74

Accuracy

106%

101%

101%

MRI-AppKedR3«20-28.S3C 3-102

Page 118: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.14-1. Feed CharacteristicsRun 5"

CharacteristicTotal solids (%)

Moisture, as % loss ondrying (%)Ash (%)Heating value (Btu/lb)

Chlorine (ppm)

Rep1

84.19

15.81

78.40

293

300

Rep 2

83.82

16.18

78.04

282

280

Run 6

83.87

16.13

77.87

380

250

Run 7

84.21

15.79

78.11

161

250

a Samples analyzed in duplicate

MRI-ApplicdR3620-28.S3C 3-103

Page 119: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

3.15 Continuous Emission Monitoring Results for SO2

In addition to the facility CEMs, MRI performed continuous monitoring for SO2 (perEPA Method 6C) during each run. The one-minute readings from these two monitors arecontained in Appendix N. A summary of those results is shown in Table 3.15-1.

MRI-AppUedR3620-28.S3C 3-104

AR3U750

Page 120: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 3.15-1. Summary of SO2 Monitoring Data

Run 5Run6Run 7

min000

S02 (ppm dry basis)max avg0.4 <0.10.4 <0.10.3 <0.1

MRI-ApplicdR3620.28.S3C 3-105

Page 121: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Section 4Quality Assurance Report

Based on the Quality Assurance (QA) reviews and audits described below, and with therelatively few minor exceptions noted in this summary, the reported test results for RiskBurn No. 2 were found to be complete relative to the Trial Burn Plan, traceable tosupporting documentation, and accurately reported as determined by results of performanceaudit samples, internal quality control (QC) data, and calculation checks of representativetest results. (A summary of QA/QC issues and concerns is given in Table 4-0, as noted inSection 4.1.)

The validity of the data is demonstrated by comparing the QA/QC results with the dataquality objectives specified in the Project Quality Assurance Plan (Trial Burn Plan for theDrake Chemical Superfund Site's Mobile Hazardous Waste Incinerator, datedSeptember 20, 1996). This comparison (see Tables 4-1 through 4-4) shows that over 90%of the accuracy, precision, and method performance objectives were met. This is based onthe number of QA objectives that were met, or met with minor exceptions, compared withthe total number of QA objectives. The minor exceptions are noted in Tables 4-1, through4-4.

The following quality assurance (QA) activities were performed in conjunction with theRisk Burn No. 2 test:

• Performance Evaluation (PE) samples were incorporated into the analyses tomeasure accuracy. Results for these PE samples are presented in Table 4-1.

• Surrogate recoveries, spike recoveries, precision and method blank data wereevaluated relative to the data quality objectives of the project QA plan (seeTable 4-2). Method blank and recovery QC results are presented in the previous textwith the sample results; precision results are presented in this section.

• The final report (in draft form) was independently reviewed and representative datafrom Run 5 were audited for correct calculation of sample results and derivedemission rates. These were found to be accurately reported and traceable tosupporting records.

MRI-Appli«I\R3620-28.s4 ' 4-1

AR3U752

Page 122: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

4.1 Discussion

On the basis of this extensive QA review, only two issues were identified which meritfurther discussion. The actions taken to resolve these issues are also discussed as well asthe potential impact these difficulties have on the subsequent use of the test results.

• Initial analysis results for recovery of Fenac and p-naphthylamine were very low orerratic for spiked feed and bottom ash samples. Because of these problems, sampleswere sent to ECC for analysis. This corrective action, and the associated ECC QCresults, indicated that the initial analytical problem did not have any impact on thedata in the report. Although the ECC analysis necessarily exceeded the holding timeby 2-5 days, it is not expected that this would significantly affect the results.

• Silver recoveries are low in the front half/back half train sample components due tomethod characteristics relative to this metal alone. This was expected, as noted inAppendix G of the Trial Burn Plan. Overall silver emission data should beconsidered as estimated values and possibly higher than reported.

A summary of QA/QC issues, along with corrective actions and assessment of theirimpact on the data and test results, is given in Table 4-0. Minor exceptions are also notedin subsequent tables of this section.

MRI-Applied\R3«20.28.s4 4-2

AR3U753

Page 123: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-0. Summary of Issues/ConcernsRisk Burn No. 2

Description ofQC Issue or Concern

Table 2-2 — Stopped samplingfor 3 min during Run 5 due tostoppage of ash dischargeconveyor.

Table 2-2 and 3.1-1— Failedfinal pitot leak check on SV trainin Run 7.

Table 3.2-1 — Matrix spikerecovery for caustic wassomewhat high at 128%.Tables 3.3-1 through 3.3-3—Benzene quantity saturated theGC/MS detector for the primaryion.Tables 3.3-1 through 3.3-3 —High recovery for one of thethree surrogates (1 ,2-DCE-d4)due to interference frombenzene.

Table 3.3-1 through 3.3-3—Interference from benzenenecessitated quantitation of 1 ,2-DCE using a secondary ion.

Tables 3.3-4 through 3.3-6— Afew VOCs present in methodblank at levels higher than incondensate samples.

Table 3.3-4 — VOST condensatesample from Train B in Run 5broken during shipment.

Table 3.4-7 — Matrix spike ofXAD showed somewhat lowrecovery of 36% forp-Naphthylamine

Corrective Action orResolution

None since feed stoppage wasless than 5 min.

Used pitot readings from PCBtrain (done at the same time andat the same level) to calculateisokinetic on SV train.

No corrective action since allsamples were non-detect.

Benzene was quantitated using asecondary ion.

Quantitated off a secondary ionbut recoveries did not improve.

Quantitation done using asecondary ion.

None since some compoundsare normally found in methodblank.

Calculations based onconcentrations found in Train Acondensate analyzed by SIM.

None. While recovery is belowplan guidelines of 50-1 50%, it isconsistent with EPA Method8270 recovery information.

Assessment of Impacton Test Results

None

None. Calculations showed thatSV train met isokinetic.

None. All samples were non-detect.

None

Impact on data was minimal andat worst might indicate thatreported values for someanalytes are higher than actual.

No impact on results.

Reported emission rates for thefew VOCs may be higher thanactual emission rates.

None because the concentrationof analytes in Train Acondensate should be the sameas Train B condensate.None.

MRI-AppIied\R3620-28.«4 4-3

AR3U75U

Page 124: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Description ofQC Issue or Concern

Table 3.4-7— XAD matrix spikerecoveries out of limits for 4 outof 56 compounds spiked (~7%)as follows:•Pentachlorophenol (41%)•3,3-Dichlorobenzidine (33%)•2,4-Dinitrophenol (14%)•Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(29%)

Tables 3.4-9 through 3.4-12—TIC levels were comparablebetween blank and samples.

Table 3.6-2— No PCB analysisresults for toluene QA rinse inRun 7, because laboratorysurrogates were mistakenly notspiked into samples.

Table 3.7-1 — Several metalspresent in simulated blank trainand sample trains in approx.equal amounts.

Table 3.7-4 — Low recovery ofAg in matrix spikes.

Table 3.9-1 and 3.9-2 — Severalof the surrogate recoveries weresomewhat outside QA objectiveof 70-1 20% for VOCs in feedand ash samples.

Table 3.10-2 — Requiredreanalysis of ash samples forp-Naphthylamine by ECCcaused extraction holding time tobe exceeded by 1 to 5 days.

Table 3.1 0-3— MS/MSDrecoveries were low, butconsistent, for 1 out of 64 (~2%)semivolatile compounds spikedin feed, 4 out of 64 (-6%) spikedin bottom ash, and 2 out of 64(~3%) spiked into flyash.

Corrective Action orResolution

None. Majority of matrix spikerecoveries were within planguidelines.

No corrective action warranted.

Problem investigated but nocorrective action possible.

None. No corrective actiontaken since these metals areubiquitous and are likelyconstituents of the filters used insample trains.

Problem was expected aspointed out in the Trial BurnPlan. Analysis, per EPA Method29, is not efficient for recovery ofAg.No corrective action takenbecause recoveries were mostlyhigh (above 120%) and problemwas considered to be minorsince lowest recovery was 60%and highest was 185%.None possible due to "one of akind" nature of samples.

None. Majority of matrix spikerecoveries were within planguidelines.

Assessment of Impacton Test Results

None

TIC emission rates may bereported high since they werealso present in blank.

None. Toluene QA rinse data isnot used in any calculation ofresults.

Reported results will be highsince Method 29 limits theamount of blank correctionallowed.

Indicates that emission resultsfor Ag are uncertain, and may behigher than reported. However,results from analysis of SRMshowed good recovery.None.

None. Degradation notexpected in this time frame dueto sterile nature of matrix and thefact that samples were sealed,stored at 4°C, and protectedfrom light.None.

MRJ-Applkd\R3620-28.«4 4-4

AR3U755

Page 125: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Description ofQC Issue or Concern

Table 3.10-3— MS/MSD resultsshowed somewhat low recoveryfor p-Naphthylamine in flyash(20%/19%)

Table 3.12-1 and 3.12-2— Lowsurrogate recoveries for onesurrogate in one feed sample,and one bottom ash sample, andtwo surrogates in two flyashsamples.

Table 3.12-2 — Requiredreanalysis of ash samples forFenac by ECC caused extractionholding time to be exceeded by 2to 5 days.

Table 3.12-3 — LaboratoryControl Spike (LCS) ofherbicides onto flyash yieldedrecoveries which were slightlybelow plan guideline of 35% for2,4-DB (22%) and for Dalapon(33%).

Table 4-1 — One performanceaudit sample, for CI" in 0.1 NH2SO4, showed slightly highrecovery of 115% (QA objective90-110%)

Tables 4-5 through 4-15— Afew of the precision values in thetables were outside QAobjectives.

Appendix B (pages B-193,B-204, and B-205)— On these 3traceability sheets the firsttransfer of the samples wasinadvertently not recorded.

Corrective Action orResolution

None since recovery was onlyslightly below ECC limits of25-100%.

No corrective action taken sincerecoveries were only slightlybelow QA objective of 50-160%,with the lowest being 37%.

None possible due to "one of akind" nature of samples.

None. Most samples and allLCS surrogate recoveries werein acceptable range and majorityof LCS spike recoveries (9 out of1 1 , or 82%) were within planguidelines.

None, since result was onlyslightly above QA objective.

None since over 98% of theprecision values were within QAobjectives.

This error was noted on thetraceability sheets.

Assessment of Impacton Test Results

None. Based on the fact thatrecovery of p-Naphthylamine inbottom ash was good(79%/83%) and none wasdetected in bottom ash. It ishighly unlikely that flyash wouldcontain higher levels ofP-Naphthylamine than bottomash.

None. Recoveries were onlyslightly below QA objective.

None. Degradation notexpected in this time frame dueto sterile nature of matrix and thefact that samples were sealed,stored at 4°C, and protectedfrom light.None.

None, based on the fact thatresult was only slightly above QAobjective and audit sample hadbeen spiked at high level(123 mg/L) whereas all sampleswere non-detect at 0.1 0 mg/L.

None.

None — samples were alwaysunder control of MRI personnelin the field.

MRI-AppIiedUU«20-28*4 4-5

AR3U756

Page 126: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

4.2 Audit Samples

A summary of the performance audit samples (PAS) is presented in Table 4-1 below.With only one minor exception for a Cl" check standard, the PAS results met accuracyobjectives. Results for the EPA dioxin audit results have been submitted to the USEPA.

AMR!-Al>plie<i\R3620-28.s4 ^

Page 127: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-1. Performance Audit Sample Results

SampleID

18358

18362

18363

18364

18359

18360

18361

16493,16494"

EPA No.5017

9379

Description

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N NaOH

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sulfuric acid

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sulfuric acid

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sulfuric acid

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sodiumhydroxide

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sodiumhydroxide

Independentcheck standard in0.1 N sodiumhydroxide

Spiked metals onfilter (analyzed induplicate)"

EPA spiked XAD

EPA spiked XAD

Parameteror

compound

Hexavalentchromium

Chloride

Chloride

Chloride

Chloride

Chloride

Chloride

AsBaBeCdCrPbNiSeAgCoCuFeMnVZn

PCDD/PCDF

PCDD/PCDF

Theoretical orprepared value

11.3pg/L

113ug/L

Not spiked

123 pg/mL

94.1 pg/mL

79.3 ug/mL

Not spiked

50 pg10 pg10 pg10 ug10 ug25 ug10 ug25 ug5pg10 ug25 ug25 ug10 ug10 ug50 ug

Provided by EPA

Analysis result

11.46pg/L

117.3ug/L

< 1 ug/mL

141 ug/mL

94.0 pg/mL

78.8 pg/mL

< 1 pg/mL

,

62 ug9.7 pg9.4 ug10.2pg10.5ug22.5 ug10.6pg25.0 ug4.5 ug10.3pg24.9 ug23.3 pg10.1 pg10.6pg50.0 pg

See Section 3.5

Accuracy or comment

101%

104%

Acceptable

115%'

100%

99%

Acceptable

61 pg11.0 pg9.5 pg10.4pg10.3 pg22.8 pg11.5 pg23.3 pg4.9 pg

10.1 pg24.8 pg23.5 pg10.1 pg10.4pgSl.Opg

124979410210590106100901039993101106100

121100951041039111593981019994101104102

Accuracy resultspending from EPA

Provided by EPA See Section 3.5 Accuracy resultspending from EPA

Objective

90%-110%

90-110%

Nocontamination

90%-110%

90%-110%

90%-110%

Nocontamination

75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%75%-125%

As specified byEPA

As specified byEPA

* Data point outside objective; no significant impact to the data is indicated." Duplicate preparation and analysis of the spiked filter.

MRI-App1ied\R3«20-28.«4 4-7

AR3U758

Page 128: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

4.3 Data Quality Objectives (DQO)

The overall quality of the data was very good, with over 90% of the data qualityobjectives for accuracy, precision, and method performance met. Tables 4-2 through 4-4summarize results of the DQO determinations for the various parameters. The results givenin Tables 4-2 through 4-4, as well as Table 4-1, were used to determine the number of QAobjectives met, or met with minor exceptions, compared to the total number of objectives.With few minor exceptions, the QA/QC measurements were within the objectives of theTrial Burn Plan (Appendix G). Method blank and recovery QC results are presented inprevious sections of the report (as indicated). Precision QC results are presented in thissection.

4.4 Data Review

As a final QA function, representative sample results for Run 5 were checked in thefinal (draft) report to help ensure that the derived test results are complete in documentationand format, traceable to supporting records, and accurately reported based on analysis dataand field measurements. Derived emission results for Run 5 were found to be accuratelyreported and traceable to supporting records.

MRi-App1ied\R3620-28.*4

AR3U7594-8

Page 129: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

es"SQ

«flj V

.o 0)»>>>

Oc1

u ,._." as-

pi5 *(0.1S1O

of ion

2

£S

SSD h)

x5 10o >.CO <j=

" J

S

<u•5.

Matrix

spike w

ith[5-

naphth

ylamin

e, in

duplicate

ri

3. 2.3.

See

and

Tab

4-8

|S

QQ.a:*2-

oi

-M CM

Page 130: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

CA•wC.U

a,

TS *-<u es &>

(U 4-1'1 sH SIen03

s

oo'Sua.

4-10

Page 131: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

s«A•wSs3 gv> S« o

S-S.?•?«

1

4co'J» «> ^ 2 &•S,ro ."• • « A ."• A r i j^

1

O Ed" OcS '5•- S9J O

I.(0

£••=-

IU

gj HI K. ——. •>• "-> U= Ol Zl ^

c?O 5c

1

Analysis of VOST

° 0

CO ro

Each

trap

h:O :

a.

fCO

VOST

Audit C

yli(If

avail

able)

-

4-11

AR3U762

Page 132: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

o

wu's«e?ow03O

•3•g 53 S«

31W5

S

<u'Soo

Q.

O

IlltilO O T 3 < / > n J C O Each

field

sample an

blank

.8(Each

field

sample an

dblank

or

One spi

XADffi

lt

£•£

Ifg. ||_

il*§Ills•sll°U S"§ Q.

gggmgia

"S

(A

o -

-n U>J UJ,

* c

4-12

AR31U763

Page 133: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

.o*5a.2W

C3tfO

O

i W"* S

IV3V

o•3<uD.

£iQ

8

o

c7*5«0.

»3<

^

iit

of determination

Ii

H- jo

5pi

1$co

1

i

z

if E§ H 2

One per t

est co

nto de

monstrate s

contro

l and

verif

)noncontaminatio

test s

amples

S

cram

to4•8XI£CO

1QQ-01

%

aPQ >»

5 1S 1

1ra<U

Each

field samp

blank

1

surrogates

(spih

g prep

aratio

n of

o sampling)

Field PCB

In lab

durin

XAD

priori

O

4o1%co

1

oQ.K

1

f2 £5? <BCN O.

•oc(Q<!>

Each

field samp

blank

0)

labora

tory

into X

AD sampl

•actio

n

Spike PCB

surrogates

prior to

ext

*•40)

1$CO

inIIIQ IS-°-so: g

Si

S £••§5 i »s 11

s-°- o

Four XA

D bla

nksdetermine i

nitial

precis

ion an

d ac

(IPR)

to

blank X

AD wi

thand n

ative PC

B

i. M

"S. 3 0-CO M 55.

Sto%SJ)co

1

z

S £••§siss 14O a) -o

"- § e

One spiked bl

anwit

h each batch

samples (to d

ete

ongoing p

recisi

orecovery (O

PR)

Q

"c 0-2J2.fl) 6)* CD•a.0CO Q.

2 gjtj5 as

10m0o.

s. I

j) CO

4-13

AR3U761*

Page 134: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

CSO•*>>

us«'2 e2.2S.3o EM wo> —

A 2

S-3o esv *-03

44)

1o

i

V)

W (0

- BJCD *ro

8 ]| s '•§ _->- £ 0).Q <

i

.l*.

Ito 110%

racy

aini

A

75% to 125%

accuracy

oranalyzed by

standard

additi

on

|

3s

*

iSor

0

into

TJ- in85

> XI',™ -i H ra

iSi or

75% to 125%

for ea

ch me

tal

analvte

SRT

co

If2 15i=E<0fc 8~

Il£I- £ «:

E JSjc ro5

4-14

AR3U765

Page 135: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

eo

EW

O

•2 -S 52,

-* Es

5 SH «

"•Cu4)S*ooF'Eo.C/}

1o

o

.1

a!

I

<

:reauencv

C

ro

Method of

determ

1

if"~ s(1o

O

>•

Z

z

8

calibr

ation

tote system co

ntntamination

.S £ 8illoJ c C4- di c<-o ra

Analysis of

blank

reagent

fl) _

t i 111

>-Q TJO- £} - ,

w fc.-S .2 A e

z

<ua.EC?•Ctotil

Duplic

ate an

alysis

of fi

eld sa

mples

0).0i=to •*!•

<pI

QQ.

in

o

O) fO

c

oS.c&_£

Duplicate a

nalysis

of QA

performance

sample

.c

o

^0

AR3U766

Page 136: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-5. Matrix Spike Results for TCLP Metals Extract of Bottom AshSpike Recovery (%)

Matrix spikeMatrix spike dup.

Precision (RPD)

Ag'

79

79

0

Asb

95

108

13

Ba"

87

86

1

Cdb

104

92

12

Cr*

73

74

1

Hg<101

102

1

Pb"113

113

0

Seb

112

127

13

3 Analysis by ICP." Analysis by GFAA.c Analysis by CVAA.

RPD = Relative percent difference

QA Objectives: 70-130% Recovery;20% RPD for precision.

MRI-Applied\R3«20-2834 4-J.O

Page 137: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-6. Matrix Spike Recoveries and Precision for SVOCs in Bottom Ashand Fly Ash

Feed Bottom ash% Recovery % Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%) (QA Objective 30-1 30%)Precision Precision

MS MSD RPD MS MSD RPDPhenolBis(2-chloroethyl) ether2-Chlorophenol1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene2-MethylphenolBis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether4-MethylphenolA/-Nftroso-di-W-propylamineHexachloroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nitrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzoic acidBis(2-chloroethoxy) methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaIeneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NrtroanilineDimethyl phthalateAcenaphthylene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Din'rtrophenol4-NrtrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-Dinitrotoluene2,6-DinitrotolueneDiethyl phthalate

79 63 23 85- - - 77_ 75- - - 7781 65 22 78— — — 5*88 71 21 79- 65_ 80- - - 63- - - 71- - - 76- - - 83- - - 89- - - 75- - - 29'35 27* 26 5s

— 7Qi &

- - - 7691 74 21 8193 75 21 89- 48- 79- - - - - 8 3- - - 90- 16"- 65- 93_ 83- - - 77- 90_ 85_ 76- - - 91_ ^_ _ 36- - - 75- - 109- - - 86- - - 84_ 97

(continued on next page)

92888384855'8770858575 ,82899985401068986899756889310018'731119589102958510149871259792108

81310990107630587111332184'12121091511111112121813141311111031151412911

Fly ash% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%)Precision

MS MSD RPD82818179805"8275846773778892824917'81778386598284913774898680898682925467108858294

84848483846*8577908574828595804116"848284896584879535798691849591909758771159287102

244552043724163321864613102446736576957146868

MRI-App!i«W*3«0-28.»4 4-17

AR3U768

Page 138: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-6 Continued(Matrix Spike Recoveries and Precision for SVOCs in Bottom Ash and Fly Ash)

Feed% Recovery

(Q A Objective 30-1 30%)Precision

MS MSD RPD4-Chlorophenyl phenyl etherFluorene4-Nitroaniline4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolA/-Nitrosodiphenylamine4-Bromophenyl phenyl etherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthreneAnthraceneDi-n-butyl phthalateFluoranthenePyreneButyl benzyl phthalate3,3 '-DichlorobenzidineBenz[a]anthiaceneBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateChryseneDi-n-octyl phthalateBenzo[i>]f]uorantheneBenzo[/c]fluorantheneBenzo[a]pyrenelndeno[1 ,2,3--co]pyreneBenzo[gA']perylene

p-Naphthylarnine (by ECC)

-

—86115_-123127-—129-105-959392-—

(30)

-

-7383—-95103--99~86-797676-—

(38)

-1632—~2621-—26-20-182020-—

(24)

Bottom ash% Recovery

(QA Objective 30-1 30%)Precision

MS MSD RPD90929979918891749084981099690699210891898484829189

(83)

10210310891100961008499921091241089980102117102101851029410198

(79)

131110149991310911131210151081113120141010

(4)

Fly ash% Recovery

. (QA Objective 30-1 30%)Precision

MS MSD RPD899310283908890708586951061009067859990918184838783

(20)"

94971088894939575909310311310695749311398988597919592

(19)'

5466465768866510913975149910

(5)

Surrogate Recoveries (%)-QA Objective 30-130%2-FluorophenolPhenol-d52-chlorophenol-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4Nitrobenzene-d52-Fluorobiphenyl2,4,6-TribromophenolTerphenyl-d14

Surrogate Recovery (%) by ECCNitrobenzene-d52-FluorobiphenylTerphenyl-d14

6070707077788389

7689116

5257585966677380

7088105

1421191715151311

8110

6570687075737472

73103111

6975737582808379

82101107

677799129

1424

6772717077707172

8999125

6876747481777878

8491109

654651038

6814

1 Data are outside the QA objectives.Objectives: 30-130% Recovery; 35% Relative Percent Difference (RPD)

MRI-Applied\R3620-28.s4 4-18

AR3U769

Page 139: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-7. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Precision Results forBottom Ash Samples

J Indicates an estimated value.U Indicates compound was analyzed, but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5X the blank value.

NC = Not calculated because one or both determinations were below the practical quantitationlimit.

Objective = s25% RPD for precision.

Concentration Observed (ng/kg)

AnalvteDioxins2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD

Furans2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF

Run 5

< 0.0710 U< 0.149 U< 0.140 U< 0.125 U< 0.153 U

6.14 J36.8 J

< 0.0872 U< 0.136 U'< 0.133 U< 0.0601 U< 0.0491 U< 0.0630 U< 0.0672 U< 0.0506 U< 0.582 U< 0.0996 U

Run 5duplicate

< 0.0431 U< 0.133 U0.209 J0.887 J1.12 J6.85 J44.8 J

0.302 J< 0.0687 U< 0.0670 U< 0.0470 U< 0.0384 U

0.316 U< 0.0525 U< 0.0615 U< 0.0708 U< 0.0758 U

Precision(RPD)

NCNCNCNCNCNCNC

NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNC

MRI-AppUeAR3«20-28.s4 4-19

Page 140: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-8. 2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxin/Furan Precision Results for Fly Ash Samples

Concentration (ng/kg)

AnalyteDioxins2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD

Furans2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3.4,7,8,9-HpCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF

Run5

< 0.0671< 0.141<0.110< 0.0980«: 0.1203.736.01

< 0.0763< 0.08840.6481.190.8370.63

< 0.06692.950.456

< 0.161

UUUUUJ,BJ,B

UUJJJJUJJ,BU

RunSduplicate

< 0.0887< 0.1490.2020.478

< 0.1894.245.71

0.925< 0.159< 0.1550.2690.9980.998

< 0.1143.15

< 0.1 372.78

UUJJUJJ,B

JUUJJJUJUJ

Precision(RPD)

NCNCNCNCNCNCNC

NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNC

J Indicates an estimated value.U Indicates compound was analyzed, but not detected.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5X the blank value.

NC = Not calculated because one or both determinations were below the practical quantitation limit.Objective = s25% RPD for precision.

MRl-Applied\R3620-28.j4 4-20

AR3U77I

Page 141: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-9. Precision Results for VOCs in Ash Samples

AnalyteChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanet-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1 ,1 ,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,2-DichIoropropanetrans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 ,1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenecis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene2-Chloroethyl-vinyl ether*Bromoform2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-PentanoneTetrachloroetheneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthyl benzeneStyreneTotal Xylenes

Rep12 J18 J--11 J-5.7 J-----16 J,B----------19

.-----11 J---3.9 J

Bottom AshRun5

1 Rep 211 J17 J--9.8 J-5.1 J---- -------------17------9.2 J---3.0 J

PrecisionRPDNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNC11NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNC

Fly AshRunS

Rep 1 Rep 22.0 J,B 2.1 J,B3.6 J,B 4.1 J,B--2.0 J,B 2.2 J,B-0.5 J,B 0.5 J,B----

3.6 J3.4 J,B---------.-,------

0.8 J,B---0.4 J,B 0.4 J,B

PrecisionRPDNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNC

Surrogate Recoveries (%) — QA objective 70-120%1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d44-BromofluorobenzeneToluene-d8

11080157"

10379139"

7112

113 112123" 11763" 134"

1572*

* Not detected in standard solutions. Compound is unstable in the presence of halocarbons.6 Surrogate recovery outside QA objective range of 70-120%." Precision for surrogate does not meet objective of 35% RPD.

J Indicates an estimated value, above the MDL but below the PQL.B Indicates that measured value is not greater than 5X the blank value.

- Indicates that analyte was not detected (i.e., <Method Detection Limit).RPD = Precision, as expressed as Relative Percent DifferenceNC = Not calculated because one or both values were below the PQL.QA objective for precision is 35% RPD.

MRI-AppIic*R3620-28*) 4-21

Page 142: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

en

"S.§cHt/3O!>•£c*.

ts0e•SS•oe

.§>o0^

««M2S

O

43H

Ills<£ ~"< V

0 V

r-ccc

<oc

:»Toc(0c

1_c

£

•ST

trac

1S.-'

«££

,?

„.1CO'ran.

CM

°-

1

.

S.

'ro£L

CM

Q-

_

•£O-

c3o:

tc

I1

rr

1

CO

'5Q.

2CL

'roQ.

IM t <°

S - sJ; ^ o>

i- -r gCO »-

1 2 8

1 § §

I S 8

(SJ CD CNftO T— O*~ *"" *"*

to f** o>

t: 2 §*~ *" *"

fe 5 8. v- ^

So N.F5 O— v- ~

£J ^ o ^^

^ "1 § s ;f - " "JssV).2 * c

| | E|||•« -2 •= VI 1 1 ig Q g JJ5 CM CD -gW T- 4 K

*O 'p1 *J?

cC * < CMO

f».3

"STSgra52.mcE

«JQ_CM

'roCL

£

(0ca.

Ero552-m.ci±

CO

'roO.

CM

"-

iQ.

intz

fra

55,m

>-

to

1

CM.!=roO.

i?Q-

h- « h.

,

fn fc gg) O O

*" "" *~

| S 8

g § S

§ | S

0 1 ° ° ^00 O O

g 2 S» - ' ~ * ~

II ^g?J in CM coJO CM T-

1 fe I HoJJ ^ g

1 1 1tt. § o

IB ~ "" ""?

2 a s 1| CM m J

•Sra8.

1O)c

p.§gi0)

!§£%•aID

a)(-•"SiS.9T3Cvl.

•ri",g£•>8i~o>X

#So |u52 1IB t'•§ "5 D*l £<8 *Of SS g I

II 12 S> §r<° .JD

~ Sat CM

1^ ^ ^® C'R .2 in ???* 1 I1 £ o 2w a. .H. 1

• -o |< . 9

m _0 C( s

4-22

Page 143: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-11. Recovery and Precision Results for Combined MM5 Semivolatile TrainFilter/XAD

Surrogate Recoveries (%)

2-FluorophenolPhenol-dS2-Chlorophenol-d41 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4N'rtrobenzene-d52-Fluorobiphenyt2,4,6-TribromophenolTerphenyl-d14

Blank Train

73848187868780113

Runs

7983

80

85

86

85

77

124

Run 6

7681

77

74

80

83

84

113

Run 7

7681

78

78

82

83

80

118

Precision(RSD)

32

2

7

4

2

4

4

QA objectives: 50-150% surrogate recovery and 50% RSD for precision.

MRI-Applied\R3S20-28.s4 4-23

AR3H»77i*

Page 144: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

«J"aScsVIfs)Jg1*

is.2

isen• IMU

p*•0

r^O

£+»Is05

ri^

'H

Ic?0) Ctk. CZ*a.

5 0 fl,2-g^o 5 o.-£> § w

•w c-

tu -2S

ffi O-~ "5* COCD Q- *• t-

^ ^S£ co n. o5 w iiio ° x*1 ^^al ^S

<u UJc<§^lm1-CO (0Eo *-

IQp QCCL *"

C

tZ i;CC 3 CD

O rCD 3 in1 K•" (0 tO

03 •*=

i(0c

c o i n r ^ o o o o o o c o i n i n cococo^rco

••srcoT-T-inr^.coS00 co^Scoj:O O h - O O I s - C D C D O O ^ 0 5 CD^I°OOCO

O O C M K O O S . O ) t ^ C M N < < < < <CDN-coint^.l--h-coco "Z. "Z. "Z. "Z. "Z.

T - t ^ c o c o c N i n c n N C O < < < < <r^-r^r>-cococoi>-cnco 'Z. "z. "Z. "Z. "Z.

CDCOrv-|s.t^-OCDCOCO < < < < <cors-CDin^cot^ooo ZZZZZ

oocMOT-co'*r>-N.oo 'O^SoiSCDN.h-COOOOOh-C3)00 CDjI^OOCO

N-T-T-T-Tj-cor^oin T~SSl°fSC O S - h - C O C O C O r v - C D C O CD°°CO;J

h - C N r ^ - c D C N i n T r C N o o oSr^-T-JPI ^ O O r ^ - C D O C D C O ^ z O O O)^lCDOO^_!

ojinr-oo'a-cDincoco cofcr^-coSC O f s * N - i n o O O 3 N . C D O O C D ^ l C D O O ^ —

c o c D i n h - i n i n c o c o i n

T-cocD'^rcoo^rTrcD < < < < <CDCocoinr^flOf~a>oo ZZZZZ

CDin^-coiococoEy'S- < < < < <C D I ^ - h ~ C D O O C O O O ° O > ZZZZZ

g£?:8SgSp° Illl-lo c o c N C N c o r - c o R ^ r < <<<<l^-!^h-CDCOflOOO°CO ZZZZZ

%LL Q 2 LL

L L Q Q Q f> LLQQL L Q D Q y y m L L Q Q > <J-, QQOO-5--S- (?«QOO-S-

S S U - Q O O ^ - ^ - i *> QO £ £•*••* Q^Q}d)jLj..oooo ^I - J C D - Y - ^ - C D£> O O °? °r op. «_ N" fC _ ro O Q. <»_ oo_ oo"c u H p H ^ o o o o N - r ^ - c D t D Q 5**TooN»t^h*g oo oo !•«." iv." co co" "sr" Q ^ ®_ N." T •*"Q Is* r*- CO CO CO CO CO CO Q 9 1s"!. " CO CO CO«J co" co" CM" CM" CN" CN" CM" CN" fi, W c*l co" CM" CM" CM"a CM" CM" -r-" Y v" T" *"" V 2 O1" T T T^opoppoopp .ffiopppp

4-24

AR3U775

Page 145: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

o:la

«

Q

iCO

to g>ro g

~H ^ m -* rr> eo a Q *"*™ f t* *•• frt CO T"» :i? m - N it "' 5: ^ »«C/3

s -To* o

(0 O3"OS

£>

IO)

biohCAoa

4SH

o:

n

_na

- 0° °°

-<oo>eoooo>2 ooo>o>

co co

000000 £0000000COCOCOCOCOCO COCOCOCOCOCOCOM *•> 3 fj PJ »^ in g

8.

O(U

Q CMQ- -Da: c>p COS 8S ^TJ D)£ 2CO ^co 33 COCO T3D) 7BP 1Ct_ i_3 OCO *-2 £>75 <i>"£ o£ SD c: oQ- i5 SassSIS•*• m mg'l S'i «i<" £ .2.51*- So o oc»n g.•isi111a. co<.

4-25

1R3U776

Page 146: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-14. Initial Precision and Recovery (IPR) Results for PCBs on XAD Resin

Natives SpikedMono (BZ-2)Di (BZ-5)Tri (BZ-29)Tetra (BZ 50)Tetra (BZ 77)Penta (BZ 87)Penta (BZ 123)Penta (BZ 11 8)Penta (BZ 11 4)Penta (BZ 105)Penta (BZ 126)Hexa(BZ154)Hexa(BZ 167)Hexa(BZ156)Hexa(BZ157)Hexa(BZ169)Hepta(BZ188)Hepta(BZ180)Hepta(BZ170)Hepta(BZ189)Octa (BZ 2.00)Deca (BZ 209)

Field Surrogates Spiked13C 3-Mono13C15-DJ13C52-Tetra13C 153-Hexa13C202-Octa13C209-Deca

IPR1

88397"706512398921118896847488929093788570738980

668296965983

IPR 2

92435"676512491971089298837789959193788672779078

688493976384

IPR 3

91402b646212187981148798847192919092708575788176

6789931026492

IPR 4

89406"7069119100951089098857697929491738976837870

6286941066690

AverageRecovery

90410"686512294961108998847592939192758673788576

6685941006387

Precision(RSD)a

2444263321144221524576

442555

Laboratory Surrogates Spiked13C77-Tetra130118-Penta13C105-Penta13C126-Penta13C156-Hexa13C169-Hexa13C180-Heota

7182889492101131

7179891039597124

6778829387102117

7285859988102111

7081869791101121

3445427

Precision expressed as Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) per Section 5 of the Trial Burn Plan.." Outside objective of 50-150% recovery.QA Objectives: 50-150% recovery and 35% RPD for precision.

MRI-Applied\R3620-I8.s4 4-26

AR3U777

Page 147: MRIgH REPORT - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileC Process and Feed Data Volume 3 D Modified Method 5 Calculations and Laboratory Paniculate Results ... G Report on Chemical

Table 4-15. Metals Train Analysis QA ResultsSpiked laboratory reagent blanks - % RecoveryQA objectives: 65-135% Recovery; 40% RPD

Metal

AsBaBeCdCr

PbHgNiSeAgAlSbCaCoCu

FeMgMnKNa

VZn

FrontHalf

10698919297

9310198954'

951011069595

9496978894

9892

FrontHalf Dup

108100919297

95 '10398967*

961081099495

9596978698

9892

Precision(RPD)

22000

220155'

17310

10024

00

BackHalf

97928997

• 94

101NA969014'

10095919492

9396948998

9495

BackHalf Dup

9491899795

100NA979487

10091909492

9396949197

9397

Standard ReferenceMaterial (% Accuracy)11

Precision(RPD)

31001

1NA14

146"

04100

00021

12

SRM #1 PrecisionSRM #1 Dup (RPD)

1249794102105

90NA10610090

NANANA10399

93NA101NANA

106100

12111095104103

91NA1159398

NANANA10199

94NA101NANA

104102

212122

1NA878

NANANA20

1NA0NANA

22

a Recovery outside QA objective of 65-135%, as discussed in text of report.b Accuracy objective: 75-125%

Precision objective: 50% RPDc Outside precision objective.

RPD = Relative Percent DifferenceNA = Not applicable

Matrix Spike Recoveries for Hg (%)

FrontHalf Dup RPD

98 96 2

H2Oj/HNOjImpingers Dup RPD

98 96 2

KMn04/H2S04Impingers Dup RPD

99 99 0

HCIRinse Dup RPD

102 106 4

MRI-AppIic*R3620-28 4 4-27

A.R3U778