mram. may 8, 2014. review and submission requirements for proposals effective may 12, 2014
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GIM 1 Revisedrefreshed . updated . streamlined
MRAM . May 8, 2014
![Page 2: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
GIM 1
Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals
Effective May 12, 2014
![Page 3: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Principal Investigator (PI)
The PI is responsible for ensuring each component of the proposal is
complete, accurate, and meets all programmatic, administrative, and
compliance requirements prior to its submission to OSP. The PI must provide the proposal on an eGC1 and indicate
it is Ready to Submit to a sponsor, consistent with the requirements of
GIM 19. The PI has made all assurances on the eGC1.
![Page 4: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
OSP
In accordance with UW Executive Order 34,
as authorized signing official and as delegated by the Vice
Provost for Research, OSP approves, signs, and transmits
proposals to external sponsors.
![Page 5: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Today we will…
Define a proposal OSP Review – when, what is
included, what is not included Standard Procedures
OSP Review Comments Re-review Submission
Resources for Campus
![Page 6: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Proposal - Defined
An application submitted by the UW on the recommendation of the PI to an external sponsor seeking funding or other support for a project.
Generally, a proposal contains: Scope of work Budget Budget justification Collaborator letters of intent Other sponsor-required documentation
![Page 7: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Proposals – Definition Con’t.
Proposals are applications that are typically submitted in competition with other applicants.
Usually in response to a broadly-distributed sponsor-issued solicitation for funding, request for proposal, or other funding opportunity announcement.
![Page 8: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Competing Proposal Types
New Resubmission Competing Renewal Competing Revision Competing Supplement Transfer to the University requiring
application materials
![Page 9: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What’s Not a Proposal
Progress Report (i.e., RPPR) After-the-Fact (ATF) Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trial Sponsored Program related
Agreement
These are reviewed using review criteria applicable to the item.
![Page 10: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
OSP Review
Begins: When eGC1 is in “In OSP” Status The program information in eGC1 is
complete and consistent with associated proposal
Ready to Submit (RTS) may be answered either Yes or No
![Page 11: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
eGC1 Returned Without Review
Incomplete eGC1s – fields left unanswered so as to prevent meaningful review
eGC1s containing significant inconsistent info with the attached proposal
eGC1s that do not contain proposal documents
NOTE: The “IN OSP” date for these eGC1s will not be counted as meeting GIM 19 deadlines.
![Page 12: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
OSP Review Criteria for Competing Proposals1 Eligibility requirements are met.
2 Formatting, page limit and technical requirements are followed; University data is correct.
3 Specific sponsor budgetary requirements are met.
4 F&A costs are calculated in accordance with GIM 13.
5 Proposal meets cost share requirements, and cost share contributions are approved by the paying unit/party.
6 All required documentation for subawards is included in the proposal.
7 Requisite compliance approvals have been obtained and compliance information is complete.
![Page 13: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Why Those Criteria?
Proposal meets institutional policies Consistent treatment by OSP
Reviewers Able to make the necessary
representations, certifications and assurances to an external sponsor
Manage UW institutional risk Ensure a successful submission to
the sponsor Ensure hard deadlines can be met
![Page 14: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
OSP Does Not Review (1 of 2)1. Grammar, spelling, sentence structure, jargon,
scientific and technical terminology, punctuation, and abbreviations.
2. Grantsmanship, including strategy, persuasiveness, and significance.
3. Scientific and technical merit.4. Correct application of non-research related UW
policies, such as academic human resource rules.5. Academic value of the research activity.6. Reasonableness of the commitment of faculty
and staff effort, and possible impacts to teaching and other obligations.
![Page 15: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
OSP Does Not Review (2 of 2)7. Facilities and resources listed are available for
use.8. Accuracy of salaries listed for individuals,
including faculty and staff.9. Sufficiency, adequacy, appropriateness, and
accuracy of the budget for the proposed research/activity (see GIM 2).
10. Department or School/College PI eligibility rules.
11.Debarment, suspension or ineligibility status of key personnel.
12.Qualifications and training of personnel to carry out the proposed research or other activity.
![Page 16: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
OSP Relies on PI Assurances
Assurances and Certifications are made by the PI when he/she approves the eGC1
Proposal is Ready to Submit (when RTS = yes)
Necessary SFI disclosures made per GIM 10
Key personnel are not debarred, suspended
Statements are true, accurate and complete
Responsible for scientific conduct University policy will be followed
![Page 17: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Criterion 1
The Proposal meets eligibility requirements.
Limited Submission PI not listed on the OSP Closeout
Delinquency List
Other examples: Sponsor requires that PI has certain degree; that UW qualifies as applicant entity type specified by Sponsor (e.g. “IHE” versus “must be 501(c)(3)”)
![Page 18: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Criterion 2
The proposal meets sponsor formatting, page limit, and technical requirements and the business data is correct.
Sponsor-specific documented requirements are met so submission via a system is expected to be successful.
UW institutional data is accurate.
![Page 19: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Criterion 3
The proposal meets sponsor’s specific budgetary requirements.
The budget is within limits imposed by sponsor.
Items of cost listed in budget are not explicitly deemed unallowable by sponsor.
![Page 20: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Criterion 4
F&A costs are calculated in accordance with GIM 13 unless sponsor publishes a cap, the sponsor is listed on the non-profit list, or an F&A waiver is granted.
Examples: off-campus location is using off-campus rate; split rates are appropriate per rate agreement; if F&A is not included in budget, dept has provided a published sponsor policy or has an F&A waiver in place.
![Page 21: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Criterion 5
Proposal meets cost share requirements.
If mandatory or prohibited by sponsor, proposal is consistent with this requirement.
If cost-share presented, it is intended as cost-share by the PI/dept.
All cost share (mandatory and committed) is supported by approval by the cost-sharing UW unit on the eGC1 or if third-party cost-share, a letter of commitment from third-party.
![Page 22: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Criterion 6
All proposed subrecipients meet the documentation requirement in GIM 7.
Subawardee documents are provided on eGC1: Letter of Intent or Facepage signed by
institutional official Scope of work Budget Budget justification Any sponsor-required documents
![Page 23: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Criterion 7
Requisite compliance approvals are met.
SFI disclosures are completed per GIM 10. Human Subjects, Animal Subjects – JIT or if
we certify we have approval, that approval is in place.
Sponsor specific regulatory assurances/certifications can be made.
We are not submitting to an entity within a country under a comprehensive embargo.
![Page 24: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Standard OSP Procedures We use the seven (7) criteria for review.
Comments by OSP will be sent to the PI and Department Contacts after initial review:
o Required changes – must take place prior to submission to the sponsor
o Recommended changes – are recommended by OSP based on its review to enhance compliance or responsiveness
![Page 25: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Re-Review
If a proposal is reviewed and changes are requested, the proposal will be re-reviewed when it is routed back to OSP, but this is limited to:o Programmatic additions comply with formattingo OSP Reviewer Comments were addressed
We encourage campus to acknowledge all changes (required and recommended) in the order they were presented in our Review.
![Page 26: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Example of Campus Response1. OSP – Failure to received Limited Submission Committee approval
will preclude submission of the application. Please attach the Committee’s approval to the eGC1.• Campus – Please see letter now attached
2. OSP – Use of special characters in the File Name is known to cause Errors upon submission via Grants.gov, per SF424 Guide. Please rename.• Campus – The attachment has been renamed and uploaded
3. OSP – Cost-share is prohibited by the sponsor per the funding announcement, however, the budget/budget justification reflects effort on the part of ___ without a commensurate request for salary. Please revise the budget to remove the cost-share commitment.• Campus – We have included a salary request for ___’s effort
4. OSP - Missing Letter of Intent , signed by the authorized official, from Yale. A letter from Yale’s PI does not suffice.• Campus – letter is now included (we were waiting on Yale)
![Page 27: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Timeline
OSP Review comments are provided or an OSP touchback to PI/dept is provided in 2 business days
E.g. Arrives “In OSP” on Monday afternoon; response from OSP by end of business Wednesday, e.g.:
o Full review with OSP Reviewer Comments
o I am in the middle of reviewing your Proposal; I will provide reviewer comments momentarily
o I have been assigned your proposal for review because I am on coverage for __. I will be providing my Review Comments shortly.
![Page 28: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Submission to Sponsor
Must give OSP access to proposal in sponsor system, if applicable (e.g.Fastlane)
OSP will upload* copy of submitted version to eGC1; this is the system of record.
*Sometimes we need the full submitted copy from PI/dept, if sponsor system precludes access to final submitted version by anyone other than PI.
![Page 29: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Thank you
Before finalizing this policy and guidance, significant feedback and
testing was performed.
OSP Pilot Group – tested review criteria Dean & Dept Group provided feedback Report given to the Faculty Council on
Research (FCR)
![Page 30: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Survey Coming
To measure the effectiveness of the new policy, guidance and process
eGC1 Admin Contacts for competing proposals arriving in OSP between May 13th and June 5th will receive a survey
![Page 31: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
New Web Resources
New OSP Prepare Proposal webpages
(phase I).
Additional pages are coming this spring/summer; MRAM overviews of content will be provided.
![Page 32: MRAM. May 8, 2014. Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032611/56649e875503460f94b8b01d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
MRAM
Your feedback or questions