mp load simulation

18
MP Load Simulation Presented in observing the Load Increment upon GPEH Record Activation during BH

Upload: bimbi-altoudi

Post on 13-Jan-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The document briefly outline the impact of RNC's MP Load with respect to the scheduled GPEH recording and running under busy hours

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MP Load Simulation

MP Load Simulation

Presented in observing the Load Increment upon GPEH Record Activation during BH

Page 2: MP Load Simulation

Objectives

The aim of this document is to present the MP Load simulation with respect to the GPEH recordings under two different scenarios; where all event-selected scenario against the minimal requirement of 62* event selected run under the Networks’ Busy Hours

* : minimum requirement of input to Actix terminal

Page 3: MP Load Simulation

Timeline

No Activity7/23/2012

7/24/2012

7/25/2012

7/26/2012

1 Data Preparation        

2 TEST 01 scheduled        

3 TEST 02 scheduled        

4 Final Reporting        

Page 3

Page 4: MP Load Simulation

Methodology of Simulation

Page 4

Test #01: a. All Event selected b. Duration: 2 hoursc. Pre-condition:

• Run under busy hours (12:00 – 14:00) & (17:30 – 19:30)• No other data tracing collection running in parallel on the RNC (to be confirmed

by OPERATOR A Team)• No Rehoming activity on progress (to be confirmed by OPERATOR A Team• No New site(s) configured on air during the monitoring (to be confirmed by

OPERATOR A Team)

2. Test #02:

a. Several events selected as per Actix minimal requirements (62)b. Duration: 2 hoursc. Pre-condition:

• Run under busy hours (12:00 – 14:00) & (17:30 – 19:30)• No other data tracing collection running in parallel on the RNC (to be confirmed

by OPERATOR A Team)• No Rehoming activity on progress (to be confirmed by OPERATOR A Team)• No New site(s) configured on air during the monitoring (to be confirmed by

OPERATOR A Team)

Minimal Event GPEH

Page 5: MP Load Simulation

TEST 01

Page 5

Page 6: MP Load Simulation

Precondition (1): Activation Time

• Scheduled Profiles on OSS targeted on RNRST06• Profiles to activate:

– C146704_RNRSTO6_all 2012/7/25 for all events: 1200hr-1400hr– C146704_RNRST06_all_2 2012/7/25 for all events: 1730hr-1930hr

Page 7: MP Load Simulation

Precondition (2): Event Selection

• All event were selected for this TEST 01 scenario

Page 8: MP Load Simulation

Precondition (3): No Major Alarms

• No major alarms found on RNRTS06

Page 9: MP Load Simulation

Precondition (4): No Major Activities

• No integration, rehoming on RNRTS06

Page 10: MP Load Simulation

RESULTS

Page 10

Page 11: MP Load Simulation

MP LOAD PERFORMANCES TEST 01

• Comparisons for 2 BH frames: 1200-1400 & 1730-1930• Missing ROP found 1745hr – 1930hr on 24/7• Peak of MP Load on 25/7 at 1st BH: 25.89% and 2nd BH: 28.27% • Peak of MP Load on 23/7 1st BH: 24.77% and 2nd BH: 25.05%• Increment: 3.22%

23/07/2012 0:00 23/07/2012 9:00 23/07/2012 18:00 24/07/2012 3:00 24/07/2012 12:00 24/07/2012 23:00 25/07/2012 8:00 25/07/2012 17:000

5

10

15

20

25

30

MP LOAD RNRST06

Total

Max Load@1730hr: 25.05%

Incomplete ROP: 1745-1930

MP LOAD TEST01

Max Load @1730hr= 28.27%

GPEH record activation

Page 12: MP Load Simulation

Analysis TEST 01

TEST1 Avg MP LOAD,

%Percentage of Increment, %

 1200-1400

1730-1930

1200-1400

1730-1930

23/07/2012 24.13 21.98 - -

24/07/2012 23.4 24.8 - -

25/07/2012 25.6 24.38 1.47 2.40

1. Methodology: average of MP Load utilization for each BH frame per day2. The data on 24/7 has missing ROP: 1745hr - 1930hr

Page 13: MP Load Simulation

TEST 02

Page 13

Page 14: MP Load Simulation

7/23/2012 0:00 7/23/2012 12:00 7/24/2012 0:00 7/24/2012 12:00 7/25/2012 2:00 7/25/2012 14:00 7/26/2012 2:00 7/26/2012 14:000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

MP Load PErformances RNRST06

Total

% M

P LO

AD

MP LOAD PERFORMANCES TEST 02

• Comparisons for 2 BH frames: 1200-1400 & 1730-1930• Missing ROP found 1745hr – 1930hr on 24/7• Peak of MP Load on 26/7 at 1st BH: n/a and 2nd BH: 29.01% • Peak of MP Load on 23/7 1st BH: 24.77% and 2nd BH: 25.05%• Increment: 3.96%

Max Increment @1730hr: 29%

GPEH record activation

Max Load@1730hr: 25.05%

Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet

Page 15: MP Load Simulation

Analysis TEST 02

1. Methodology: average of MP Load utilization for each BH frame per day2. The data on 24/7 has missing ROP: 1745hr - 1930hr

TEST 02Avg BH

Percentage of Increment

1200-1400

1730-1930 1200-1400

1730-1930

7/23/2012 24.13 21.98 - -

7/24/2012 23.4 24.87 - -

7/25/2012 25.6 24.38 - -

7/26/2012 not used 25.74 Not used 3.76

Page 16: MP Load Simulation

Traffic Overview – CS Erlang

• CS Traffic has increased from 6395E to as high as 7182E for 23/7 and 26/7 respectively

• 23/7 VS 26/7: An increment of 12.31%

6395.18 7182.74

Page 17: MP Load Simulation

Traffic Overview – R99DL Volume• Traffic R99_DL has

increased from 5068.17MByte to as high as 5403MByte on 23/7 and 26/3 respectively

• 23/7 VS 26/7: An increment of 6.63%

5068.17

Page 18: MP Load Simulation

Summary

Page 18

The simulation of MP Load on RNRTS06 has been done to observe the MP LOAD impact upon the activation of GPEH records for two different scenarios

Maximum increase for MP LOAD of 3.96% observed on TEST 02 due to the highest traffic level compared to that of TEST 01 and reference

Traffic increased by 6.63% and 12.31% for R99 DL and CS Erlang respectively when compared 26/7 to 23/7

Typical MP LOAD range for RNRST06 for the past few days: 24% ~ 30%, therefore it is considered safe to run the Recordings in longer duration

MP Load is significantly affected by the level of Traffic being handled in addition to other factors of Channel switching rates, Mobility, Attached/Detach rates, etc

 1st BH 2nd BH

Reference

% Increment

1st BH 2nd BHTEST 01 25.89%

28.27%

24.77% 1.12% 3.50%

TEST 02 n/a

29.01%

25.05%n/a 3.96%