moving from traditional licenses to subscription – better sales ... · moving from traditional...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
MovingfromTraditionalLicensestoSubscription–BetterSalesCompensationPractices
ByClintonGott,PrincipalatBetterSalesCompConsultantsOneofthemostcommonquestionswereceivefromsoftwareorganizationstodayishowthesalescompensationprogramcansupportthestrategicevolutionfromtraditionallicensestosubscription-based(SaaS)models.WallStreetandcompanyvaluationmethodologiesallseemtorewardforit,andmanyhavetocometolabelthisthenew“strategydujour”.It’snotalwaystheeasiestchangetomakeandthechangeitselfmaymeandifferentthingsandhavedifferentimplicationstothoseespousingsuchastrategy.Whileeachorganization’sspecificneeds,opportunities,andintentionsmaybeunique,thereareanumberofconsiderationsthatwerecommendkeepinginmind.SubscriptionSales–“NewtoSomebutNottoOthers”It’shelpfultofirstrealizethatsubscriptionorrecurringrevenuetransactionsmaybesomewhatnewtosoftwarecompaniesbuttheyarenotnewtoawiderangeofindustries.Considerinsurancepremiumsthatreneweachyearandthusrepresentrunratebusiness.Orconsideranorganizationthatsellscreditinformationtobanksforloanprocessing;theybuythatinformationeachandeveryyear.FromtheConsumerPackagedGoodsspace,channelmanagerswhosellthroughretailchainsclearlyexperiencerunraterevenue.Forthosewhowanttogowaybackandmayhavehoofeditasanewspaperdeliveryperson,thattooisarunrateorrecurringrevenuemodel.Irecallgettingmy$1/monthforeachhouseonmyroute;Ididn’tknowIwasatthecuttingedgeofstrategicevolution.Thekeydistinctioniscompanyservingasanongoingsupplierofproductsorservicesversusonewithone-timeorintermittentpurchases.Clearly,manyindustrieshavebeenwrestlingwiththistopicforalongtime,whilesomesoftwareorganizationsarefacingitforthefirsttime,atleastforsoftwarelicensesalthoughnotnecessarilyformaintenanceand/orservices.Insomeoftheseindustries,suchasinsurance,compensationispaidontherunratebusiness,whichcreatesafamiliarannuitystreamthatisoftencommonandaccepted.Insomeworlds,theseplanswillutilizeahardthreshold(compensationpayoutsoccuronlyafteracertainpointofresults)orasoftthreshold(compensationpayoutsstartatfirstdollarbutatalowerrateandincreaseasresultsprogresstowardaperformanceexpectationorgoal);thesepaylinefeaturescanhelpfocussalesenergyontheportionoftheachievementcurvemostunderarep’scontrol,e.g.,wheretheycontrolprotectionandgrowth,ratherthanpurelyabsolutevolume.Thesearenotnecessarilymodelsthatthesoftwareindustrytypicallytriestoemulatenorshould,butit’sagoodrealitychecktounderstandthatthesituationisnottrulynew.
Page 2
SoftwareandtheFocusonBookingsSoftwareisoneindustrywithalegacyofpayingonbookings.Comparedtosomepurerevenuebasedmodels,payingonbookingsorcontractsigningmorecloselytiesthecompensationpayoutstothesoftwarelicensesalesdirectlyunderasalesperson’scontrol.Folksoftenfeelbooking-basedplanscreatemoresalesenergy,inspiremoremotivatedreps,andaligntoexcitingsalescultures.Andbookingsofcourseavoidstheannuityfeelinhighrunratemodelsandavoidsthechallengesofusingthresholdstocreatetherightenergy.[Onesidenoteofcourseconcernstheneedforroleclarityandwhosupportsnewvs.existingaccounts,butthat’sbroaderthanthisarticleandisbestleftforanotherday.]Intermsofsalescomppractices,wefindsoftwareorganizationsaremostinterestedincontinuingtopaysalesincentivesonsomeformofbooking,andsomostdesignsattempttoaligntothisobjective.Buthowandwheredosubscriptionlicensesfit?SoftwareEvolutionPartI–“LivinginBothWorlds”Inmanycases,whensoftwarecompaniestalkaboutevolvingfromtraditionallicensestosubscriptionlicenses,theyrarelymeanasuddenandwholesalechangefromsellingperpetuallicensestotermand/orSaaS.ParticularlyinlargesoftwaretransactionsinaB2Bspace,wefindmostcompaniesreallymeantheywanttosupportacustomerbuyingthesoftwareinanynumberofways–perpetual,term,orSaaS.Theorganizationwantstosupportanyandallsoftwarelicensesales,whilestillencouragingasteadyandgradualmigrationtowardsubscriptiondeals.Eventhenthough,manyacknowledgethatcustomersneedtobeallowedtobuythewaytheywanttobuy,orsomecompetitorwillswoopinandoffertheflexibilitythecustomerdesires.
Inthesecases,themostimportantfeatureofasalescompensationplanisthatitdoesnotpushasalespersontoforceacustomertobuyinanuncomfortableway.
Oneimportantconceptcompaniesconsiderishowtocreatedealneutralityordealagnosticismforthesalesrep.Thismeansthatnomatterhowthecustomerwantstobuy,thesalescreditandtheincentivepaymentiskeptrelativelyconsistent.Ifwepaythesameeffectivecommissionratesforaperpetualdealvs.anannuallicense,it’seasytoseetherepwillonlypushforthemuchlargerperpetualdeal.
Poorlydesignedsalescompplanscansabotageratherthanenableanevolvingsubscriptionstrategy.
Oneofthemostcommonapproachesistofindwaystonormalizethecreditofeachlicense.OnetechniqueistodecreasethesalescreditforaperpetualdealtoaligntotheAnnualContractValue(ACV)forcomparablesubscriptiondeals.WealsoofcourseneedtoconsiderhowtohandleMaintenanceaswellasProfessionalServices,allundertheconstructofpaying
Page 3
onbookings.Inthespacebelow,weprovideanexampleofhowoneorganizationchosetocreatedealneutrality.
Category Type CoreCreditingRules
License Perpetual TotalDollars/5years
Term TotalDollars/TermYears
SaaS AnnualizedValue
ProfessionalServices(PS)
NewDeals PSDollars/3years
Upgrade PSDollars/3years
Maintenance NewDeals 1stYearDollars
Thistablewasspecifictooneorganization’sbusinessandwillalmostsurelynotbeperfectlyapplicabletoanother.Buttheoverallconceptsareworthconsideration.ThisclientdeterminedtheirCoreCreditingRulesbasedonahistoricalanalysisofpriordealsandanestimateofhowtheycouldcreatedealneutralityforfuturedeals.Thesalespersonwasbasicallykeptwholeintermsofsalescreditingandcompensation,regardlessofhowthecustomerwantedtobuy.Inothercases,we’veseenexamplesofcreditingrulesthatslightlyovervaluetheresultsforSaaSversustraditionallicenses.Orwe’veseencreditingupticksontheACVvaluebasedonthenumberofbindingyearsinthecontract.Again,eachcaseisdifferent,buttheoverallconceptisoneofthebettersalescompensationpracticescompaniesshouldconsiderwhenmovingfromtraditionallicensestosubscription-basedopportunities.SoftwareEvolutionPartII–“DivinginwithBothFeet”Inmuchlesscommoncases,acompanymaysimplydecidetoactivelyendsalesoftraditionallicensesandmove100%tosubscription-basedsales.ThecaseofAdobeseveralyearsagoisonecommonlycitedexamplewhereanorganizationmadeanaggressiveandnearfullscalemove.Inthesecases,thenecessarysalescompensationplandesignapproachstillgoesbacktobestpractices–identifytherightmeasures,determinethebestmechanics,andworkontheplandetailstoaccomplishyourobjectives.Inmanyways,companiesthatgoinwithbothfeetareresurrectingaspureplaySaaSorganizations,andtermslikeMRR,QRR,andARRwillallarise.Inreality,thebuildingblocksofanACVbasedplan,potentiallywithcreditingupticksformulti-yearresultscanstillworkquiteeffectively.ACVandSaaSsalesoftengohand-in-hand.
Page 4
OverallImpacts–“BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor”Inmostcaseswe’veencountered,strongearlyenthusiasmtomovetowardsubscriptionbaseddealsendsupwaningabitasrepercussionsareassessed.Thereareusuallysignificantrevenuerecognitionimpactsinthecurrentyear.CompanieslikeAdobehadtoprimethemarkettounderstandthatneartermrevenuemaydroptogainthebenefitofsteadierandlonger-termresults.We’veseenthiseffecteveninprivatelyheldcompaniesasnoonewantstomissoverallfinancialtargetsorseeneartermincreasesintheexpensetorevenuerelationship,evenwhenconsideringthefuturebenefitsthatsubscription-basedresultscanoffer.Patienceisrarelyavirtueintoday’smodernworld.Asonerecentclienttoldus,“Wecan’tshakeouraddictiontoend-of-yearperpetualdeals!”.Wehearthisquiteoften.Therearecaseswhereacompany’sleadershipmaysimplyneedorwanttohaveadealtakenperpetuallyversusstickingtothesteadysubscriptionstrategy.Insuchcases,havingadealagnosticsalescompensationplancanensurethesalesrepresentativeiswillingtofollowwhateverdirectionsheorsheisgiven.Therightplancanalignoverallstrategicvision,pragmaticin-yearrevenuerecognitionrequirements,andtheresultingsalescompensationpayouts.Itcanalsoworkforthecustomerswhoareallowedtopurchasethewaytheydesire.Ultimately,webelievethebestsalescompensationplansworkforthecompany,thesalesrepresentative,andthecustomersaswell.
Biography Clinton Gott co-founded Better Sales Comp Consultants with Ted Briggs in 2009. Over nearly two decades of industry experience, Clinton has helped hundreds of clients assess, design, and communicate better sales compensation plans. He avidly believes in the power of an enabled sale force driven by motivational and cost-effective sales compensation plans, crafted through an effective, efficient, and collaborative design process. His design solutions leverage cross-industry best practices, with recent experience in general high-tech, software (SaaS and traditional), consumer products, financial services, logistics, distribution, and many others. His prior experience includes senior roles at Towers Watson and Sibson Consulting, and Clinton earned an MBA with distinction from the UCLA Anderson School of Management.
Contact Information Clinton Gott Principal, Better Sales Comp Consultants [email protected] 310-968-3408 www.bettersalescomp.com
www.xactlycorp.com
– Matt Hodges, Mid-Market Account Executive
I’m now selling more strategically because I’m confident that the numbers will always be accurate.
1-866-GO-XACTLY