moocs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

18
MOOCS: THE POWER OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING AND THE COMMUNITIES OF KNOWLEDGE Marta CáceresPiñuel UNED PhD Researcher GOGN Member OCWC Lujbljana 23th April 2014

Upload: the-open-education-consortium

Post on 27-Jan-2015

106 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

   

MOOCS:  THE  POWER  OF  COLLABORATIVE  LEARNING  AND  

THE  COMMUNITIES  OF  KNOWLEDGE  

  Marta  Cáceres-­‐Piñuel  UNED  PhD  Researcher  

GO-­‐GN  Member  OCWC  Lujbljana  23th  April  2014  

 

Page 2: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

PhD  AIM  &  HYPOTHESIS  

•  AIM:      •  To  analize  MOOCs  and  Beyond  (MOOCs  as  New  online  spaces  for  Open  Knowledge;    New  

Methodologies,  innovaYve  social  dynamics,  and  renewed  insYtuYonals  designs  associated  for  creaYng  Open  CommuniYes  of  Knowledge)    

 •  HYPOTHESIS  1.  MOOCs  enable  much  more  than  massive  spaces  for  scalable  online  courses.-­‐  MOOCs  create  new  

online  spaces  for  CommuniYes  of  Knowledge.    2.  MOOCs  can  permeate  remove  borders  in  (formal/non  formal)EducaYon  and  enlarge  open  

knowledge  sharing  in  two  direcYons.  –   They  offer  soluYons  for  EducaYonal  InsYtuYons  (Secondary  Schools/UniversiYes/Colleges…)  to  offer  Open  

and  Massive  educaYon  (formal/non  formal).  –  They  offer  Open  Knowledge  Networks  to  different  stakeholders  (companies,  insYtuYons/  individuals…).  

Networks  to  access  knowledge,  to  organise  knowledge,  to  share/exchange  knowledge  with  others.    3.  MOOCs  are  a  powerful  tool  in  combinaYon  with  other  social  tools  (P2P  acYviYes,  fora,  Q&A…)  for  

Global  Open  Knowledge  Networks.  Knowledge  networks  (academic,  professional,  communiYes  of  pracYce)  can  be  connected  in  a  region  or  even  globally.    

Page 3: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

THEORETICAL  FRAMEWORK    •  Networking  Analisys  Theory    (Sociological  ProspecJve)    •  Networkig    analysis  is  based  on  an  assumpYon  of  the  importance  of  relaYonships  

among  interacYng  units.  The  social  network  perspecYve  encompasses  theories,  models,  and  applicaYons  that  are  expressed  in  terms  of  relaYonal  concepts  or  processes.  Actors  and  their  acYons  are  viewed  as  interdependent  rather  than  independent,  autonomous  units(…)(1).(Wasserman,  S.  and  K.  Faust,  1994,  Social  Network  Analysis.Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press.  

•  ConnecJvism  (  EducaJonal  ProspecJve)  •  ConnecYvism  is  a  hypothesis  of  learning  which  emphasizes  the  role  of  social  and  

cultural  context(1).    The  relaYonship  between  work  experience,  learning,  and  knowledge,  as  expressed  in  the  concept  of  ‘connecYvity,  is  central  to  connecYvism,  moYvaYng  the  theory's  name.The  phrase  "a  learning  theory  for  the  digital  age”(2)  indicates  the  emphasis  that  connecYvism  gives  to  technology's  effect  on  how  people  live,  communicate  and  learn.(  George  Siemens.  ConnecYvism:  A  Learning  Theory  for  the  Digital  Age)  

•  (1)ConecYvism  and  Previous  Theories:  ConnecYvism  is  oien  associated  with  and  proposes  a  perspecYve  similar  to  Vygotsky's  'zone  of  proximal  development'  (ZPD),  an  idea  later  transposed  into  Engeström's  (2001)  AcYvity  theory.  It  is  somewhat  similar  to  Bandura's  Social  Learning  Theory  that  proposes  that  people  learn  through  contact.  

Page 4: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

 DATA  ANALYSIS  

MOOC  survey  to  Students  and  Learning  AnalyYcs    

     

TOOLS:   Survey   to   Students   and   Learning   AnalyYcs   from   2   different  MOOC  Plamorms                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    UNED  COMA:  

   The  MOOC  strategy  of  the  NaYonal  Distance  University.            Spain.Removing  borders  of    Distance  EducaYon  in  Spanish                  UNX:  The  open  LaYnamerican  Plaoorm  for  Entrepreneurship                                                                  Training  and  CreaYng  Networworking  for  new  Entrepreneurs  

RATIONAL  OF  THE  MOOC  DATA  ANALYSIS  •  MOOCs   collect   valuable   data   on   student   learning   behavior;   essenYally   complete  

records  of   all   student   interacYons   in   a   self-­‐contained   learning   environment,   and  analize  their  opinions  and  moYvaYon  with  the  benefit  of  large  sample  sizes.    

•  Our   main   objecYve   here   is   to   show   how   the   huge   amount   of   data   available   in  MOOCs   offers   a   unique   research   opportunity,     permirng   not   only   to   study  detailed   student   profile   ,   interest   and   behavior,   but   also   analize   how   these  students   interact  with  other  peers     in  a  new  online  environment  creaYng  a  new  space  for  Knowledge  ang  Networking.  

             •  UNED  COMA:  The  MOOC  strategy  of  the  NaYonal  Distance  University.  Spain.Removing  borders  of    Distance  EducaYon  in  Spanish  

 •  UNX:  The  open  LaYnamerican  Plaoorm  for  Entrepreneurship.-­‐  Training  and  CreaYng  Networworking  for  new  Entrepreneurs    •  Case  Study:  Course:  Transversal  Competencies  for  Entrepreneurship.  Director  Jose  Antonio  Diaz.  UNED  Professor.  (MOOC    offered  in  both  plaoorms)  

Page 5: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

     

CASE  STUDY:    MOOC:  Transversal  Competencies  for  Entrepreneurship.  

(Course    offered  in  both  plaoorms)  

   •  Total  Students:261.480  

•  In  the  Course:  5602    •  Sample:210  surveys  •  DescripYon:  Clasic  xMOOC    Academic  

Plamorm  (Language,Spainish)  •  Features:  (OpenMOOC)  

–  (Video,  test,  Self-­‐assessment,  online  and  presenYal  cerYficaYon)  

–  Some  social  tools      (Fora,  Curator,  Facilitator    P2P  

acYviYes,  P2P  Assesment,    open  badges)  

•  Total  Studens:38.881  •  In  the  Course  2262  •  Sample:  82  surveys  •  DescripYon:  ThemaYc  cMOOC  Plamorm  

focused  on  Entrepreneurship  (MOOC  layar+Community    layar)  (Languages  Spanish  &Portuguese)  

•   Features:  (WeMOOC)  •  MOOC  Plamorm  (video,test,  self-­‐assessment,  

online  cerYficaYon)  •  Social  Layar:  (Karma,  system  of  voYng,  fora,  Q&A,  Tool  for  friendship,  Content  upload  by  users  ,  Supply  &  demand  ads,  events,  Facebook,  twiuer,…)  

Page 6: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

QUESTIONS  FOR  ANALYSIS  1.   Who  is  behind  the  MOOC?  Sociodemographic  Profile  of  students  2.   Why  do  they  register  in  a  MOOC?  MoJvaJon  3.   What  is  the  level  of  Drop  out?  CompleJon  Rate  and  CerJficaJon  

availability  4.   What  is  the  level  of  Social  parJcipaJon  in  the  online  

environment?.InteracJon  with  peers.  5.   How  do  students  learn  in  a  MOOC  environment?  Tools  Used  and  

learning  style  6.   How  to  measure  MOOC  success?  Beyond  the  scalability  of    the  

online  learning  experience;    Level  of  saJsfacJon  and  outputs  (For  students  and  InsJtuJons)  

7.   Where  are  the  MOOC  borders?  Language  and  internaJonalizaJon  8.   Lessons  Learned      

Page 7: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC  PROFILE  ¿What  is  the  profile  of  the  students  in  

the  Case  Study?  (I)  •  Note:  NO    significant  sociodemographic  differences  between  plamorms,  or  with  

other  MOOC.  

0%  

35,37%  

46,34%  

13,41%  

4,88%  

0%  5%  10%  15%  20%  25%  30%  35%  40%  45%  50%  

<15  years   15-­‐30   31-­‐45   46-­‐55   >55  years  

Age  of  MOOC  students  (%)  

Age  of  MOOC  students  (%)  

36,59%  

63,41%  

Sex  of    MOOC  Students  %  

Women  

Men  

AGE   GENRE  

Page 8: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

 ¿What  is  the  profile  of  the  students  in  the  

Case  Study?  (II)  

11,11%  

88,89%  

Place  of  residence  %  

Rural   Urban  

0%  

7,32%  

14,63%  

37,80%  40,24%  

0%  

5%  

10%  

15%  

20%  

25%  

30%  

35%  

40%  

45%  

EducaJon  %  

EducaYon  %  

SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC  PROFILE    

Page 9: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC  PROFILE  ¿What  is  the  profile  of  the  students  in  

the  Case  Study?  (III)  

10,98  

32,93  

37,8  

12,2  

6,1  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

40  

Job  SituaJon  (%)  

Job  SituaYon  (%)  

10,98  

70,33  

12,2  

6,1  

Student  

Worker/Self-­‐employed  

Unemployed    

Other  situaYon  

Page 10: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

MOTIVATION  (To  Register  in  the  MOOC)    

92,68  

91,46  

53,66  

48,78  

0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90   100  

InteresYng  Subject  

To  Entrepreneur  

To  find  a  job  

To  Improve  my  current  job  

MoJvaJon  %    

78  

4  

6  

1  

10  

0   50   100  

IntesYng  Subject  

Profesional(to  find  a  job)  

Curiosity  

CerYficaYon  

Other  moYvaYon  (to  entrepreneur)  

MoJvaJon  %  

Page 11: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

RATE  OF  COMPLETION  ¿  PotenYal  link  with  cerYficaYon?  

•  37´8%    complete  the  course  •  1,23%  cerYficaYon  apply  

(cerYficaYon  fee  for  ECTs  credits)  

•  23´5%  Complete  the  course  •  No  cerYficaYon    

•  DROP  OUT  PATH  

0  500  1000  1500  2000  2500  

CerYficaYon  

Page 12: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

PARTICIPATION  (InteracYon  with  peers)  

•  Level  of  ParJcipaJon  (Fora)  

78,51%  

0,65%  20,81%  

Level  of  ParJcipaJon  (Karma)  

Low  ParYcipaYon  

High  ParYcipaYon  

No  parYcipaYon  (observers)  

4,60   8,25  

87,85  

ParJcipaJon  %  

Low  ParYcipaYon  

High  ParYcipaYon  

No  parYcipaYon  (Observer)  

Page 13: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

USE  OF  TOOLS    FOR  LEARNING  

0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80  

Videos  

Contents  

Test  

Selfassesments  

P2P  Asessment  

Facilitator  Support  

Curator  Support  

Peer  Support  

Use  of  Social  Tools  

0   20   40   60   80   100   120  

Videos  Test  

Selfassesment  Contents  

P2P  AcYviYes    Facebook  (followers)  Twiuer  (followers)  

Supply/demands  ads  Q&A  regarding  MOOCs  

P2P  Direct  Contact  Fora  comments  

VoYng  tool  Wrirng  in  personal  walls  

Sharing  contents  

Use  of  Social  Tools  

   

Page 14: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

LEVEL  OF  SUCCESS    SaYsfacYon  and  Outputs  

•  Percentage  of  SaJsfacJon  95%  

0  

25,61  

29,27  

45,12  

0   10   20   30   40   50  

No  

ParYally  capable  

Very  capable  

Totally  Capable  

Do  you  feel  capable  to  entrepreneur  aeer  the  MOOC  (%)?  

Percentage  of  SaJsfacJon  98%  

OUTPUT  OUTPUT  

0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80  

I  konw  beuer  UNED  University  

I  would  like  to  parYcipate  in  other  UNED  MOOC  

I  woull  like  to  parYcipate  in  Formal  Courses  in  UNED  

I  will  not  parYcipate  in  formal  course  in  UNED  

Aeer  the  MOOC  Experience…  

Page 15: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

13.640  4.080  

1.632  

1.089   711  

518  

372  

328  262   214  

Visits  per  Country  Spain  

Brazil  

Mexico  

Colombia  

ArgenYna  

Perú  

 Student  per  Country  

Spain  

Colombia  

Mexico  

ArgenYna  

Peru  

INTERNATIONALIZATION  Removing  Borders  with  Languages  

Page 16: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

PRELIMINARY  FINDINGS    1.  Typical  sociodemographic  Profile:  man,  25-­‐35  years  old,high  educaYon,  

worker  and  urban.  2.   MoJvaJon:  Interest  in  academic  subject  and  job  purposes  (LLL)  3.  The  level  of  drop  out  in  a  MOOC  could  be  linked  with  cerYficaYon  availability;  

More  CompleYon  Rate  if  there  is  a  CerJficaJon  (specifically  in  academic  MOOC  environments)  

4.  The  tradiYonal  MOOC  environment  (xMOOCs)  promotes  less  interacJon  between  peers  than  communiYes  of  knowledge  (cMOOCs)  .  

5.   Learning  style  in  MOOCs  is  Autonomous  but  ICT  and  Social  Tools  can  enable  more  collaboraJve  learning  style.  

6.  MOOC  success  must  be  measured  beyond  the  scalability  of    the  online  learning  experience;    Level  of  saJsfacJon  and  outputs  for  students  and  InsJtuJons  must  be  take  in  account.    

7.   Language  is  the  main  enabler  for  internaJonalizaJon  of  MOOC  8.   Lessons  Learned  :  More  Learning  AnalyYcs  are  needed  and  a  standardized  

framework  for  assessment.      

Page 17: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

 

“IntuiYons  without  data  are  just  opinions”                                                                                                                                                                                      THANK  YOU!!!  

Page 18: MOOCs: the power of collaborative learning and communities of knowledge

       

Marta  Cáceres-­‐Piñuel  UNED  PhD  Researcher  

Mail:  [email protected]