monsanto fraud is the great gm crops scam unravelling

7/28/2019 Monsanto Fraud Is The Great GM Crops Scam Unravelling

1/10

Even the New York Times is now suspicious about Monsanto and GMOscience

When that long time house mag of The Politically Correct Though Police and

The Scientific Dictatorship, The New York Times starts to question the science

ehind one of the New World !rder"s sacred cows it"s a sure sign attitudes are

changing#

The target of a recent NYT article was $onsanto%s so&called science of

genetically&engineered food crops# You may e aware 'you ha(en"t een li(ing on this

planet if you"re not) that *enetically engineered organisms or as they are more

informally known genetically modified seeds ha(e een hyped as one of the great

hopes of science for feeding a gloal population of + illion that is increasing

epontentially# $onsanto are the leading iotech company manufacturing genetically

modified seeds and ha(e estalished a near monopoly on seed for staples like corn,soya, -.

Genetically modified organisms - one of science's sacred cows?


2/10

/ike the great Caron Dri(en 0nthropogenic *loal Warming scam, those who

worship science and ha(e made it their religion kept telling us the science was settled,

there was no douting the results, genetically modified food crops were the only way

forward# Well the science was not settled on either climate change or *$ foods#

1or the past 23 years, independent researchers ha(e een attacking $onsanto

sponsored science in (arious ways, and finally the NY Times has 4oined the crowd#

5ut it%s the way $ark 5ittman, lead food columnist for the Times maga6ine,

layes into oth $onsanto"s dodgy research methods and the complicity of

go(ernment in letting the fascistic corporation write its own rules that really rings

the whole *$! house of cards crashing down# Writing in his 0pril 2 column, 7Why

Do *#$#!#%s Need Protection.8, a reference to the so called $onsanto Protection

5ill, 5ittman opens with9

7*enetic engineeringin agriculture has disappointed many people who once had

hopes for it#8

0s in9 the party%s o(er, turn out the lights#

5ittman eplains9 7-genetic engineering, or, more properly, transgenic

engineering : in which a gene, usually from another species of plant, acterium or

animal, is inserted into a plant in the hope of positi(ely changing its nature : has een

disappointing#8

What he means is the results of research not controlled y $onsanto and their

usiness partners shows the claimed increased yields from *$ crops can only e

achie(ed y gi(ing *$ plants fa(ourale conditions o(er non *$ sowings#

0s if this weren%t enough, 5ittman spells it out more specifically9 7;n the nearly

23 years of applied use of *#oundup

hericide'$onsanto de(elops oth the seeds andthe hericide to which they%re

resistant) and crops that contain their own insecticide# The first ha(e already failed, as

so&called superweeds ha(e de(eloped resistance to >oundup, and the second are
http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/genetic-engineering/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/genetic-engineering/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/monsantos-roundup-herbicide/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/monsantos-roundup-herbicide/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/genetic-engineering/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/monsantos-roundup-herbicide/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/monsantos-roundup-herbicide/http://www.pakalertpress.com/tag/genetic-engineering/


3/10

showing signs of failing, as insects are ale to de(elop resistance to the inserted 5t

toin ? originally a acterial toin ? faster than new crop (ariations can e

generated#8

5ittman continues, commentingthat superweed resistance was a

foregone conclusion@ scientists

understood, from the earliest days of

*$!s, that spraying generations of

these weeds with >oundup would

gi(e us eactly what we ha(e today9

failure of the technology to pre(ent

what it was designed to pre(ent# The

weeds wouldn%t die out# They would

retool and thri(e#

7The result is that the iggest crisis in monocrop agriculture : something like +3

percent of all soyeans and A3 percent of corn is grown using >oundup >eady seed :lies in glyphosate%s inaility to any longer pro(ide total or e(en predictale control,

ecause around a do6en weed species ha(e de(eloped resistance to it#8 *lyphosate is

the acti(e ingredient in >oundup#

Bust as the weeds de(eloped resistance and immunity to the hericide, insects that

were supposed to e killed y the toin engineered into $onsanto%s 5T crops are also

sur(i(ing#

That"s how e(olution works# Why is it that scientists, the (ery people who are

always anging on aout e(olution when faith is mentioned, ha(en"t the first clue

how it works# The (ery same thing has happened in humans where diseases that

scientists claimed has een (irtually eradicated y penicillin are now making a

comack and antiiotic resistant acteria are now spreading diseases from

tuerculosis to gonorrhea among the population#

1i(e years ago a left wing rag like the New York Times would ne(er ha(e printed

New crop varieties


4/10

such a complete demolition of *$! plant technology# Now it seems the attitude is

7well, e(eryody knows so why other lying any more#8

What e(eryody knows, or at least e(eryody who matters to the New York

Times, is that the game is up, go(ernments and international ureaucracies like thenited Nations and the ;$1 'oth controlled y gloalist ankers) might continue

telling the lie in the hope that Bosef *oeels was right and in the end it will ecome

true, ut The Times sees no point in supporting this Scientific Dictatorship scam any

longer# *enetically $odified !rganisms were ne(er aout feeding the poor, they

were aout concentrating control of the food supply in the hands of a few powerful

corporations#

/ike most newspapers that rely on print sales for their re(enue The New York

Times has struggled for some years# While it is easy to lame this on the internet

things are seldom as simple as they appear to e# The print media ha(e aandoned

their role of holding politicians and corporate interests accountale for their actions#

;t would take an editor and a C

column y commissioning a series of eposes on the gigantic scientific confidencetricks that ha(e een pulled off y 5ig 5iotech, 5ig Pharma, the caron cap and trade

pirates, the anks and so many more industries that found it easier to preser(e profits

y stealing from tapayers than trying to compete with 0sian ri(als# When and only

when newspapers like the New York Times resumme their campaigning role as the

champions of Boe and Bosephine citi6en will they see sales pick up and people

ecome more willing to pay for an online suscription# The pulic see a ton of

corporate propaganda deli(ered to their mail o e(ery day, it"s known a 4unk mail,

why should they pay for what are allegedly news stories ut in reality are 4ust

regurgitated (ersions of the press releases sent out y corporate pulic relations

departments#

0 well managed campaign can gi(e a pulication enough momentum to carry it

forward for se(eral years# Set the news hounds loose on a story, task them with theepose of failure, dishonesty, malfeasance and corporate or political crime, to lift the


5/10

glossy skin of modern society and epose the corrupt, maggotted mess underneath,

return to traditional 4ournalistic (alues like protecting sources and formerly reticent

researchers, corporate employees and go(ernment officials will queue to spill the

eans# We all know society is corrupt to the core ut such a cosy atmosphere eists

etween the media, corporate and financial interests, go(ernment with it"s politici6ed

legal system, academic community, ci(il and military ser(ice and academics that

those who should e speaking out ha(e seen many others efore them thrown o(er

the cliff, people know that in the witch hunts directed against truth tellers, the little

people who try to do the right thing are dispensile#

0 story like $onsanto could e a

game changer, at the moment the march

towards gloal fascism led y the

ankers and multinational corporations

seems unstoppale ut it would only

take one crusading newspaper to say

7They can stuff their ad(ertising udget

- the truth matters@ it is etter to die on

our feet than li(e on our knees,8 and

people would realise the game isn"t o(er y a long way# 0ll we need to do is oycott a

company"s products#

$onsanto are etremely (ulnerale, they ha(e put themsel(es in a position where

the usiness is hea(ily reliant on *$ seed# With a concerted effort, with the truth

aout how *$ crops do not produce higher yields, irrigation and fertili6er are

responsile the impro(ement 'e(er wondered why a $onsanto contract requires only

the fertili6ers and pesticides they specify are used and lays down strict conditions on

watering.) aout the independent research that has linked *$ foods to many health

prolems in humans 'all ruished y the $onsanto propaganda machine of course

ut all ale to stand up to honest scrutiny,) and cause en(ironmental damage in

li(estock and natural (egitation#

The truth matters
http://www.greenteethmm.com//truth-tellers.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com//truth-tellers.shtml


6/10

!nce the we of deceit has unra(elled enough, the complicity of go(ernment a

the human health nd the academic community would e implicated# 0ll those gli

statements aout 7noody has gotten sick from *$!s8 will e(aporate in the wind#

;t will ne(er happen of course, the same anks that own $onsanto own The NewYork Times and own or eercise some kind of control o(er they companies The New

York Times must sell ad(erti6ing space to# 5ig 0g too ig to fail, so much acreage

around the world is tied up in *$! crops that to an them now ecause the

technology was ne(er properly tested, the discredited research filtering system of

peer re(iew has een eposed as est pals" re(iew and the companies in(ol(ed ha(e

already een hammered for criminal acti(ityin other areas#

0s long as the media is part of the same estalishment that (iews the *$!

industry as a way of ringing the dream of gloal totalitarian go(ernment to

realisation we are fighting a war of attrition##

Centrali6ing the food supply in the hands of a few corporations means the

population of the world, in the near future, will eat or not eat according to the dictates

of a caal of unelected academics, ureaucrats annd illionaires# >edistriution of

asic resources to the people of oundup)#8

The owners of the logMomsAcrossAmerica.comsay the report was shared with

them y De Dell Seed Company, Canada%s only non&*$! corn seed supplier, which
http://www.greenteethmm.com/big-pharma-criminality.shtmlhttp://www.momsacrossamerica.com/stunning_corn_comparison_gmo_versus_non_gmohttp://www.greenteethmm.com/big-pharma-criminality.shtmlhttp://www.momsacrossamerica.com/stunning_corn_comparison_gmo_versus_non_gmo


7/10

otained it from a $innesota&ased agricultural company called ProfitPro# !(erall,

the paper found that non&*$! corn is 20 times richer in nutrition, energy and

proteincompared to *$! corn#

The log summarises the report9

Concerning energy content, as measured in terms of *S, non&*$! corn was

found in tests to gi(e off 3,400 times more energy per gram, per secondcompared

to *$! corn, an astounding (ariance# 0nd as far as its o(erall percentage of organic

matter is concerned, non&*$! corn was determined to ha(e nearly twice as much of

this (ital component compared to *$! corn#

Non&*$! corn contains sustantially more potassium, magnesium, calcium,

sulfur and manganese

The field comparison also e(aluated indi(idual nutrient de(iations, which

re(ealed some shocking facts# Potassium, which is necessary for energy production

and proper cellular function, is arely e(en present in *$! corn, ha(ing clocked in

at 3#A parts per million 'ppm)# ;n non&*$! corn, howe(er, potassium le(els were

more than 13 times higher, testing at +#2 ppm#

The disparity was e(en worse for magnesium, which tested at a mere 3#2 ppm in

*$!corn# ;n non&*$! corn, howe(er, magnesium le(els were found to e 46

times higherthan in non&*$! corn# Similar (ariances were oser(ed for calcium,

sulfur and manganese as well, with the contents of each eing 12.4, 14, and seven

times higher, respectively#

!n the other hand, non&*$! cornwas found to e free of chlorides,

formaldehyde, glyphosate, and other harmful chemicals, while in *$! corn they

were identified in dangerously high le(els# 0ccording to an analysis of the report y

MomsAcrossAmerica.com, *$! corn contains aout 19 times more glyphosatethan

is permitted as a maimum in drinking water y the #S#Environmental rotection

Agency'


8/10

Similarly, *$! corn contains dangerously high le(els of formaldehyde,

according to the report# 0 pre(ious study conducted y Dr# Don Euer on *$!s

re(ealed that #+A ppm of formaldehyde is toic if ingested y animals# 0s it turns out,

*$! corn contains 200 times more formaldehydethan this maimum safety

threshold#

These shock findings are at great odds with the claims continually eing made y

agri&genocide giant $onsanto# !n its corporate wesite, $onsanto claims that

appro(ed genetically&modified '*$) crops are 7sustantially equi(alent8 to non&

*$!s, meaning they are not nutritionally different from non&*$!crops# 5ut as this

study shows, these claims are patently false, and indicate that $onsanto is engaged in

a gloal agricultural scam ased on complete lies#

7*lyphosate is a strong organic phosphate chelator that immoili6es positi(ely

charged mineralssuch as manganese, coalt, iron, 6inc, copper, etc# that are essential

for normal physiological functions in soils, plants and animals,8 eplains Dr# Euer

aout how *$! crop chemicals literally destroy the nutrient content of *$! crops#

To learn more aout how to a(oid *$!s in the food supply, (isit9

http9FFwww#westonaprice#orgFmodern&foodsFhow&to&a(oid&gmos

!ome critics of GM"s claim human genes

have #een inserted into food crops.
http://www.naturalnews.com/non-GMO.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/minerals.htmlhttp://www.westonaprice.org/modern-foods/how-to-avoid-gmoshttp://www.naturalnews.com/non-GMO.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/minerals.htmlhttp://www.westonaprice.org/modern-foods/how-to-avoid-gmos


9/10

Sources for this article include:

http:!!!.momsacrossamerica.com

http:!!!.gm!atch.org

"e! #$% lines can re!ire your &ody

'iotech (ndustry )ropaganda

*uman #enes +ngineered (nto #$% ice

+-/+ )%S/S:

Speed p (ntroduction %f #$ rops Says (ncreasingly Stalinist oalition #overnment

e /old ou /hat #$ rops re *armless laims ere 'olloc5s

airy armers uined: ree $ar5ets 7ersus orporate ictatorship

-atest ear and )anic Strategy: /hey /ell s e re ll #oing /o Starve

Scalar aves: hidden source of clean, cost free energy

Seven 'illion: )opulation #ro!th nd (ts onse8uences

#$ crops !ill not feed the !orld/o feed the !orld !e need more %2 not #$ crops

ust !hat chemicals are going in your food

#lo&al ood risis and ontrol rea5ery

/he anger %f $onopolies /o /he ood Supply

ood and nother Science raud

lone co!s give human mil5

rea5y ran5enstein ish

7ertical arming

Science and technology menu

#reenteeth +nvironment rticles

/en 4 /en ;poetry

monsanto fraud is the great gm crops scam unravelling

Documents