monopolistic competition

29
Monopolistic Competition A2 Micro

Upload: tutor2u

Post on 15-Nov-2014

3.646 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A2 Microeconomics: This is a revision presentation on aspects of monopolistic competition designed for A2 business economics students

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic CompetitionA2 Micro

Page 2: Monopolistic Competition

Get help from fellow students, teachers and tutor2u on Twitter:

#econ3

@tutor2u_econ

www.tutor2u.net

Page 3: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition

• Monopolistic competition is a form of imperfect competition

• It can be found in many real world markets ranging from clusters of sandwich bars, other fast food shops and coffee stores in a busy town centre to pizza delivery businesses in a city or hairdressers in a local area

• Monopolistic competition is similar to perfect competition, some economist regard it as more realistic, because the products are differentiated

Page 4: Monopolistic Competition

Assumptions of the Market

1. There are many producers and many consumers - the concentration ratio is low

2. Consumers perceive that there are non-price differences among products i.e. there is product differentiation – competition is strong, plenty of consumer switching takes place

3. Producers have some control over price - they are “price makers” not “price takers” but the price elasticity of demand is higher than it would be under a situation of monopoly

4. The barriers to entry and exit into and out of the market are low

Page 5: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition: Falling AR and MR, Price and Profits

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR

MR

Page 6: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition:

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR

MR

P1

Q1

Page 7: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition:

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR

MR

P1

Q1

C1

Page 8: Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition:

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR

MR

P1

Q1

C1

Abnormal profits

Page 9: Monopolistic Competition

Identify three factors that affect the “pricing power” of an individual firm in monopolistic competition

1. There still may be many competitors keeping pricing ‘low’

2. Product ‘differentiation’ allows firm to charge a different price to reflect any unique qualities of the product/service

3. Barriers to entry and exit of the market are low so this requires firms to price competitively

Page 10: Monopolistic Competition

Long Run Equilibrium for Monopolistic Competition

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR

MR

P1

Q1

Unlike monopoly, there are no barriers to entry. This means that short run supernormal profit attracts new producers into the market

Page 11: Monopolistic Competition

Long Run Equilibrium for Monopolistic Competition

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR2

MR2

P2

Q2

As more firms enter the market, the demand curve facing any existing firm moves to the left

Page 12: Monopolistic Competition

Long Run Equilibrium for Monopolistic Competition

MCPrice, Cost

Output

AC

AR2

MR2

P2

Q2

The demand curve continues to move to the left until it is tangential to the AC curve. At this point, the firm is at its profit-maximising level of output (because MR = MC) but is making normal profit (because AR = AC)

Page 13: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

Is branding / marketing important?

Are entry barriers zero, low or high?

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run?

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 14: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

Is branding / marketing important?

Are entry barriers zero, low or high?

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run?

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 15: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

No – price takers

Yes – some pricing power

Is branding / marketing important?

Are entry barriers zero, low or high?

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run?

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 16: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

No – price takers

Yes – some pricing power

Is branding / marketing important? No Yes – key non-price competition

Are entry barriers zero, low or high?

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run?

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 17: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

No – price takers

Yes – some pricing power

Is branding / marketing important? No Yes – key non-price competition

Are entry barriers zero, low or high? Zero barriers Low barriers

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run?

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 18: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

No – price takers

Yes – some pricing power

Is branding / marketing important? No Yes – key non-price competition

Are entry barriers zero, low or high? Zero barriers Low barriers

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run? Yes: Price = MC Not quite (P>MC)

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run?

Page 19: Monopolistic Competition

How does Monopolistic Competition differ from Perfect Competition?

Perfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition

Number of producers (sellers in the market) Many Many

Types of goods and services available for consumers Homogeneous Differentiated

Does the firm have control over their own prices?

No – price takers

Yes – some pricing power

Is branding / marketing important? No Yes – key non-price competition

Are entry barriers zero, low or high? Zero barriers Low barriers

Does this market structure lead to allocative efficiency in the long run? Yes: Price = MC Not quite (P>MC)

Does this market structure lead to productive efficiency in the long run? Yes – min LRAC No – higher LRAC

Page 20: Monopolistic Competition

Economic efficiency?

• Prices are above marginal cost – meaning that the equilibrium is not allocatively efficient

• Saturation of the market may lead to businesses being unable to exploit fully economies of scale - causing average cost to be higher than if less firms and products were in the market

• Critics of heavy spending on marketing and advertising argue that much of this spending is wasted and is an inefficient use of scarce resources. The debate over the environmental impact of packaging is linked strongly to this aspect of monopolistic competition

Page 21: Monopolistic Competition

Application: The UK Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Industry

A fragmented marketEstimated 78,000 taxis and 153,000 licensed

private hire vehicles in England and Wales

An estimated 80% of UK taxis are relatively small

owner-operator businesses

The industry as a whole generates revenues of nearly £9 billion per

year

Addison LeeFounded by minicab driver John Griffin in

1975 with just one car, Addison Lee has become a major

competitor to London's black cabs and now

carries more than 10m passengers a year.

Bought by Carlyle, the US hedge fund manager

in July 2013

Private hire vehiclesMini cabs cannot be

hailed from the street and must rely on

telephone and internet bookings and walk-in

reservations

Most private hire vehicles are licensed

but there are also some un-licensed operators

London Black TaxisThere are over 23,000

black cab drivers

Entry is restricted to those with licence and

drivers who have passed “the Knowledge”

Page 22: Monopolistic Competition

Application: The UK Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Industry

A fragmented marketEstimated 78,000 taxis and 153,000 licensed

private hire vehicles in England and Wales

An estimated 80% of UK taxis are relatively small

owner-operator businesses

The industry as a whole generates revenues of nearly £9 billion per

year

Addison LeeFounded by minicab driver John Griffin in

1975 with just one car, Addison Lee has become a major

competitor to London's black cabs and now

carries more than 10m passengers a year.

Bought by Carlyle, the US hedge fund manager

in July 2013

Private hire vehiclesMini cabs cannot be

hailed from the street and must rely on

telephone and internet bookings and walk-in

reservations

Most private hire vehicles are licensed

but there are also some un-licensed operators

London Black TaxisThere are over 23,000

black cab drivers

Entry is restricted to those with licence and

drivers who have passed “the Knowledge”

Page 23: Monopolistic Competition

Application: The UK Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Industry

A fragmented marketEstimated 78,000 taxis and 153,000 licensed

private hire vehicles in England and Wales

An estimated 80% of UK taxis are relatively small

owner-operator businesses

The industry as a whole generates revenues of nearly £9 billion per

year

Addison LeeFounded by minicab driver John Griffin in

1975 with just one car, Addison Lee has become a major

competitor to London's black cabs and now

carries more than 10m passengers a year.

Bought by Carlyle, the US hedge fund manager

in July 2013

Private hire vehiclesMini cabs cannot be

hailed from the street and must rely on

telephone and internet bookings and walk-in

reservations

Most private hire vehicles are licensed

but there are also some un-licensed operators

London Black TaxisThere are over 23,000

black cab drivers

Entry is restricted to those with licence and

drivers who have passed “the Knowledge”

Page 24: Monopolistic Competition

Application: The UK Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Industry

A fragmented marketEstimated 78,000 taxis and 153,000 licensed

private hire vehicles in England and Wales

An estimated 80% of UK taxis are relatively small

owner-operator businesses

The industry as a whole generates revenues of nearly £9 billion per

year

Addison LeeFounded by minicab driver John Griffin in

1975 with just one car, Addison Lee has become a major

competitor to London's black cabs and now

carries more than 10m passengers a year.

Bought by Carlyle, the US hedge fund manager

in July 2013

Private hire vehiclesMini cabs cannot be

hailed from the street and must rely on

telephone and internet bookings and walk-in

reservations

Most private hire vehicles are licensed

but there are also some un-licensed operators

London Black TaxisThere are over 23,000

black cab drivers

Entry is restricted to those with licence and

drivers who have passed “the Knowledge”

Page 25: Monopolistic Competition

Examples of Price and Non-Price Competition in the Taxi Industry

Examples of price competition by taxi businesses

1

2

3

Examples of non-price competition in the licensed taxi market

1

2

3

Pre-arranged agreed fares

Different price per time/mile

Different price for ‘hail’ over ‘booked’ vehicles

‘Luxury’ cars, personal driver

‘Disabled-access’ for car use

Later pick-up times (after 12pm)

Page 26: Monopolistic Competition

Examples of Price and Non-Price Competition in the Taxi Industry

Examples of price competition by taxi businesses

1

2

3

Examples of non-price competition in the licensed taxi market

1

2

3

Pre-arranged agreed fares

Different price per time/mile

Different price for ‘hail’ over ‘booked’ vehicles

‘Luxury’ cars, personal driver

‘Disabled-access’ for car use

Later pick-up times (after 12pm)

Page 27: Monopolistic Competition

London Taxi Fares in 2013

The table shows typical fares and journey times based on distance for three types of tariff. Fares and journey times may be higher if there are delays or heavy traffic. There

is a minimum fare of £2.40 at all times. Source: Transport for London website

DistanceApprox journey

time

Monday to Friday

06:00 - 20:00

Monday to Friday

20:00 - 22:00Saturday and

Sunday 06:00 - 22:00

Every night22:00 - 06:00

Public holidays

1 mile 6 - 13 mins £5.60 - £8.80 £5.60 - £8.80 £6.80 - £9.00

2 miles 10 - 20 mins £8.60 - £13.80 £9.00 - £13.80 £10.40 - £14.60

4 miles 16 - 30 mins £15 - £22 £16 - £22 £18 - £27

6 miles 28 - 40 mins £23 - £29 £28 - £31 £28 - £33

Between Heathrow

and Central London

30 - 60 mins £45 - £85 £45 - £85 £45 - £85

Page 28: Monopolistic Competition

How might an increase in competition impact on consumers?

London Taxi Fares in 2013The table shows typical fares and journey times based on distance for three types of tariff. Fares and journey times may be higher if there are delays or

heavy traffic. There is a minimum fare of £2.40 at all times. Source: Transport for London website

Distance Approx journey

time

Monday to Friday 06:00 - 20:00

Monday to Friday20:00 - 22:00

Saturday and Sunday

06:00 - 22:00

Every night22:00 - 06:00Public

holidays

1 mile 6 - 13 mins £5.60 - £8.80

£5.60 - £8.80

£6.80 - £9.00

2 miles 10 - 20 mins £8.60 - £13.80

£9.00 - £13.80

£10.40 - £14.60

4 miles 16 - 30 mins £15 - £22 £16 - £22 £18 - £27

6 miles 28 - 40 mins £23 - £29 £28 - £31 £28 - £33

Between Heathrow

and Central London

30 - 60 mins £45 - £85 £45 - £85 £45 - £85

1. Lower Prices2. More availability of

taxis3. Better quality taxis4. Increased safety for

journey home

Page 29: Monopolistic Competition

Get help from fellow students, teachers and tutor2u on Twitter:

#econ3

@tutor2u_econ

www.tutor2u.net