monolithic pixel detectors in a deep submicron soi process, tipp, tsukuba, japan 11-17 march 2009 1...
TRANSCRIPT
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
1email: [email protected]
Discussion of process features to target optimum monolithic SOI Pixel Detectors
Grzegorz DEPTUCH
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA
OUTLINE:
1) objectives of optimization,
2) conclusions from previous work,
3) Design details of pixel imaging detector „MAMBO”,
4) Achievements, observations and investigations,
5) Conclusions on current status of the technology,
6) Discussion around necessary changes to the process,
7) Conclusions.
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
2
Fabrication of detecting layer and electronics in Fabrication of detecting layer and electronics in
the same fabrication flow requires investigating the same fabrication flow requires investigating
potential improvements from different angles:potential improvements from different angles:
ObjectivesObjectives
Optimization of the SOI electronics for designs of
readout circuits with dominant presence of analog functions
Optimization of detector – grade handle wafer for carrier lifetime and charge transport properties
Cohesion of the detector layer and
the electronics, minimisation of
mutual detrimental coupling
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
3
Summary and conclusions from pre-SOPIX worksSummary and conclusions from pre-SOPIX works
F. Pengg, „Monolithic Silicon Pixel Detectors in SOI Technology”, CERN/ECP, RD19 collaboration, January 1996, Ph.D. thesis
work related to detection of ionizing radiationwork related to detection of ionizing radiation
J. Marczewski, et al., „Technology development for SOI monolithic detectors”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, 560, 2006, 26-30
•Need for careful shileding between the SOI electronics and the detector underneath the BOX ()•Thick SOI (quasi-bulk process for optimum analog performance)
GOOD in CONCEPTS but NOT SUCCESSFUL – BECAUSE OF LACK OF SUFFICIENTLY ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
Coupling issue recognized!!!
Nested buried wells proposed!!!
Thick SOI layer
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
4
Summary and conclusions from pre-SOPIX worksSummary and conclusions from pre-SOPIX works
work related to visible light imagingwork related to visible light imaging
B.Pain, Ch.Sun, X.Zheng, S.Seshadri, T.J. Cunningham, „SOI-based Monolithic Imaging Technology for Scientific Applications”,2007 international image sensors workshop, June 6-10, 2007 Ogunquit, ME
W.Zhang; M.Chan; H.Wang; Ko, P.K.;,” Building hybrid active pixels for CMOS imager on SOI substrate”, SOI Conference, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International,1999 , 102 - 103
X.Zheng, C.Wrigley, G.Yang, B.Pain;, ” High responsivity CMOS imager pixel implemented in SOI technology”, SOI Conference, 2000 IEEE International2000, 138 - 139
Pinning layer
implanted!!!
No attention to coupling
Excluded from sensitivity
Path
of e
volu
tion
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
5
Implementation of buried P-well in current OKI processImplementation of buried P-well in current OKI process
n- -type
• BPW is helpful in maintaining constant potential under any circuitry that is placed at the periphery of the matrix of pixels. • The potential control underneath the BOX may be achieved by designing a closely spaced matrix of PSUB contacts. It was shown that this works relatively well on the fabricated circuits (the cost is a penalty of some are lost for multiple PSUB contacts).
• BPW is not providing any benefit for protection against charging of the BOX layer as a result of accumulation ionizing doses of the incident radiation. The circuitry is exposed directly to the modulation of conduction resulted from the charged oxide of the BOX.
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
6
Review of role of BPW layerReview of role of BPW layer
Generally electric field in the p-on-n detector is not uniform in case of very
small p-type implant separated by large lateral distance
Potential pockets can be created with no electric field – thus no charge collectio
from some regions
The distribution of electric field can be improved by increasing effective sizes of
implants using BPW islandsSmaller distances between BPW islands may lead to shorts, especially if some residual p-type effective „doping” occurs underneath
the BOX
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
7
Review of role of BPW layerReview of role of BPW layer
Extension of effective size of diodes achieved by adding BPW over PSUB is not bringing any good inside pixels,
direct coupling paths sending all transient interferences to the input of an in-pixel amplifier, additionally multiple
feedback path are created taht may lead to instability of the processing chain
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
8
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
9
2 3 4 5 6 7 80
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
pixel 5/6
(fully enclosed)
0..0.8V 1..1.8V
ind
uce
d e
q. e
lect
ron
s
Vback [V]
Depleted
No
t d
eple
ted
Yet
!!!
(as depletion grows into depth
capacitive coupling saturates)
• A
Ccoup=0.3 fF
2 3 4 5 6 7 80
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
pixel 5/6
(fully enclosed)
0..0.8V 1..1.8V
ind
uce
d e
q. e
lect
ron
s
Vback [V]
Depleted
No
t d
eple
ted
Yet
!!!
(as depletion grows into depth
capacitive coupling saturates)
• A
Ccoup=0.3 fF
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.60
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
indu
ced
eq.
ele
ctro
ns
U [V]
Equation y = a + b*x
Weight No Weighting
Adj. R-Square0.99998 Value Standard Error
J Intercept -43.71429 2.25921
J Slope 1883.14286 2.4848
pixel 5/5 (fully enclosed)
VB=6.5V
eq. coupling C = 0.3fF
Review of role of BPW layerReview of role of BPW layer
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
10
Review of role of BPW layerReview of role of BPW layer
This is not BPW, but contamination that may
change effective conduction type to p type directly
underneath BOX
Generally electric field in the p-on-n detector is not uniform in case of very
small p-type implant separated by large lateral distance
Potential pockets can be created with no electric field – thus no charge collectio
from some regions
The distribution of electric field can be improved by increasing effective sizes of
implants using BPW islandsSmaller distances between BPW islands may lead to shorts, especially if some residual p-type effective „doping” occurs underneath
the BOX
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
11
Design details of pixel imaging detector „MAMBO”Design details of pixel imaging detector „MAMBO”
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
12
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Transistor with floating body was used (poor precision SPICE models
gave wrong value of gds) –
later measurements showed very small equiv. resistance
12
PMOS biased at PMOS biased at
VVGSGS=const as a feedback =const as a feedback
resistor (50 Mresistor (50 M))
0.15 m
0.20 m
shaper design in MAMBO II used shaper design in MAMBO II used
longer L & half-H-Gate design for longer L & half-H-Gate design for
feedback transitor (feedback transitor (SBCSBC))
As a result, required values of feedback
resistor were obtained.
Empirical approach is needed to compensate
for insufficient device modeling
W/L=0.63u/0.3u
MAMBO IMAMBO II
MAMBO I single pixel testMAMBO I single pixel test
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
13
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
14
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
15
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
16
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
17
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
18
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations MAMBO II single pixel testMAMBO II single pixel test
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
19
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
M. Connell, et all. Impact of Mobile Charge on Matching Sensitivity inSOI Analog Circuits, 2007 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
20
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
21
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
22
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
23
Achievements, observations and investigationsAchievements, observations and investigations
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
24
Conclusions on current status of the technologyConclusions on current status of the technology
M. Connell, et all. Impact of Mobile Charge on Matching Sensitivity inSOI Analog Circuits, 2007 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
25
Discussion around necessary changes to the processDiscussion around necessary changes to the process minimum:minimum:
CURRENT VIEW
INCREASE THICKNESS OF BOX
this is only partial improvement!
ttBOXBOX=200nm, t=200nm, tGOXGOX=4.5nm, wide oxide areas favors positive charge trapping, =4.5nm, wide oxide areas favors positive charge trapping,
threshold voltage shifts, ions flows and transistors shows poor behavior threshold voltage shifts, ions flows and transistors shows poor behavior
Isolation of vertical contacts achieved naturaly as contact openings are etched in oxide
all is the same but bottom gate action all is the same but bottom gate action
is dcreased proportionally to tis dcreased proportionally to tBOXBOX
increase of tBOX may affect metrology on the production line
It is not believed that only only increase of tBOX will be enough
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
26
real improvement (suggestion for minimum process complication) real improvement (suggestion for minimum process complication) shift from shift from
FD-SFD-SooI to quasiI to quasi--bulk-Sbulk-SooI – this is necessary!!!I – this is necessary!!!
Discussion around necessary changes to the processDiscussion around necessary changes to the process
I step: Grow epitaxial silicon on UNIBOND wafers from SOITEC
II step: blanket implantation of p-type film and n-type film island
The grown layer will be used for the substrate for transistors, no isolation of transistor islands!! to achieve screening
III step: cuts of contact holes, S/D implants, cuts of STI
Important is that p-type film is left around cuts, it is fully enclosed by n-film for self centering
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
27
real improvment (prepared in such way that minimum modificatio)real improvment (prepared in such way that minimum modificatio)
Discussion around necessary changes to the processDiscussion around necessary changes to the process
After this step all processing is the same as it was for the original OKI-SOI process!
IV step: fill with oxide and planarization
P-type film areas left around opening will be left floating. After etching opening for S/D, poly-gate and diode openings there will not be needed to passivate walls with exposed p-type Silicon with oxide
Islands hosting pmos transistors will be AC-grounded
- It is wise to stay with n-type detector silicon - Transistors will be closer to bulk devices (advantage is that the continuous film will be AC-grounded, but each n and p type island will be fully isolated
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
28
Discussion around necessary changes to the processDiscussion around necessary changes to the process
V step: etch contact opening and fill
Eacthing of contact opening is self centered, the fill material will be in contact wit p-type material but the opposite side of the diode will be grounded
- The contact between the fill metal and the floating p-type material will result in some extra capacitance, however it should not be meanigful for amplifiers based on the virtual ground principle – as it is the optimum implementation for the readout circuitry!
Monolithic Pixel Detectors in a Deep Submicron SOI Process, TIPP, Tsukuba, Japan 11-17 March 2009
29
ConclusionsConclusions The SOIPIX collaboration formed around KEK is a opportunity to explore new 0.15 The SOIPIX collaboration formed around KEK is a opportunity to explore new 0.15 m m
1P/5M and 0.20 1P/5M and 0.20 m 1P/4M FDSm 1P/4M FDSooI CMOS processes by OKI altered to allow charge collection I CMOS processes by OKI altered to allow charge collection
from H-R substratefrom H-R substrate,,
Within two available runs, we managed to obtain working design of the continuous time Within two available runs, we managed to obtain working design of the continuous time
pixel circuit,pixel circuit,
We have problems with counters switchable to shift registers for outputing the data; We have problems with counters switchable to shift registers for outputing the data;
problem is understood and could be avoided if parasitics extraction was available, problem is understood and could be avoided if parasitics extraction was available,
Effort spent on extensive tests led to conclusion on unavoidable deeper adaptations of the Effort spent on extensive tests led to conclusion on unavoidable deeper adaptations of the
process to make it suitable for monolithic detectors, process to make it suitable for monolithic detectors,
Guidance for the optimum process has been Guidance for the optimum process has been
drawn; can it be introduced by the foundry? drawn; can it be introduced by the foundry?
Our experience with 3D-IC using 0.18 Our experience with 3D-IC using 0.18 m FDSoI m FDSoI
process by MIT-LL and discussions with experts process by MIT-LL and discussions with experts
suggests excluding the use of FD-SoIsuggests excluding the use of FD-SoI for designs for designs
with analog, with analog,
more runs more runs and more efficient communication and more efficient communication
are needed to forge the design – dominant part of are needed to forge the design – dominant part of
learning occurs throughlearning occurs through experimenting (modeling experimenting (modeling
required), required),