monitoring and evaluation (m&e)

20
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) If one goal of your project is to have real impacts on farmers through high quality technical research, then you will need to have some way of finding out if you are achieving these impacts! The trouble is that many things affect farmers’ livelihoods, so you need some way to calculate the contribution of your research to their livelihoods.

Upload: olympe

Post on 11-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). If one goal of your project is to have real impacts on farmers through high quality technical research, then you will need to have some way of finding out if you are achieving these impacts! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

If one goal of your project is to have real impacts on farmers through high quality technical research, then you will need to have some way of finding out if you are achieving these impacts!

The trouble is that many things affect farmers’ livelihoods, so you need some way to calculate the contribution of your research to their livelihoods.

Page 2: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Impacts (e.g. increased income)

Outcomes (e.g. large areas planted with this variety)

Outputs (e.g. selection of variety with high DM and sugar yields)

Activities (eg. working with farmers to evaluate new sugar cane)

Inputs (eg. planting material, money, labour, ideas, information)

Things we do

Impacts

Eas

yD

iffi

cult

How are impacts generated on your project?

Page 3: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

You will also need a monitoring tool as the situation in the field can quickly get beyond the capacity of researchers to monitor individually….

Page 4: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

1995

16 16 farmers starting to evaluate forages

An example from Sepaku in East

Kalimantan

Page 5: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

1996

16

10

10 farmers expanded

How big an area and which species?

1995

53 53 new farmers started to test forages

6 farmers did not expand or stopped

6

Page 6: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

1995 1996 1997

10

53

16

10

6

40

8

4

13

2

2

Farmers starting to evaluate forages

Farmers expanding their forage area

Farmers not expanding their forage area

It is starting to become very complicated

Page 7: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

1995 1996 1997 1998

10

53

40

13

16

10

8

2

6

4

2

31

10

6

3

0

1

2

9

3

4

5

2

3

0

Farmers starting to evaluate forages

Farmers expanding their forage area

Farmers not expanding their forage area

Impossible to handle without a monitoring tool

Page 8: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading…

934720Number of farmers

200019991998

20out

47out

93out

47new

93new

Page 9: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading…

202020Average Area (sq m / farmer)

934720Number of farmers

200019991998

Impact??

Page 10: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

You will also need a monitoring process because data on impacts from farmer trials can be misleading…

120545020Average Area (sq m / farmer)

934720Number of farmers

200019991998

Who? Many farmers?

What impacts? How significant?

Page 11: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Before you start a process of measuring the impacts of your research, you need to know:

•What impacts are happening?

•How many farmers are experiencing these impacts?

•Are the impacts significant in farmers’ lives?

Only then should you start to quantify the impacts.

Page 12: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Getting answers to these three questions may not be easy.

Stories of impacts are often misleading (exaggerated or based on stories from just one farmer)

Reports from the field are often very uninformative about ‘impacts’…only about outputsOne method we have used to capture impacts as they start to happen in the field is the use of digital photography as a basis for monitoring

Page 13: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

One method we have found very useful to capture impacts as they start to happen in the field is the use of digital photography

Page 14: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

Page 15: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning

with communities:

Village characterisation

Page 16: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers

Adoption Tree Surveys

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning

with communities:

Village characterisation

Page 17: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a

particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production)

Farmer Focus Groups

Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers

Adoption Tree Surveys

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning

with communities:

Village characterisation

Page 18: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a

particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production)

Farmer Focus Groups

Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers

Adoption Tree Surveys

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

Informally monitor problems,

innovations and activities

Informal Observations

From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning

with communities:

Village characterisation

Page 19: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

A simple process for M&E

Impacts identified by Farmer Focus Groups are followed up with measurements

Quantifying Impact

Common interest groups of farmers in villages working together on a

particular issue (e.g. women working on improving pig production)

Farmer Focus Groups

Monitoring evaluation and adoption of innovations being tested by farmers

Adoption Tree Surveys

Laying a baseline for impact assessment

Baseline Survey

Informally monitor problems,

innovations and activities

Informal Observations

From secondary information and results of participatory diagnosis and initial planning

with communities:

Village characterisation

Page 20: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Source: Werner Stür, CIAT

Click the back button on your browser to return to the main menu