molecular pathology: upper gi cancer · 2019. 5. 29. · hans prenen 2 revisiting pathology:...

17
BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancer Hans Prenen 1 Hans Prenen, MD, PhD Department of Oncology University Hospital Antwerp Molecular pathology: upper GI cancer Moving from pathology Diffuse type Intestinal type

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    1

    Hans Prenen, MD, PhDDepartment of OncologyUniversity Hospital Antwerp

    Molecular pathology: upper GI cancer

    Moving from pathology

    Diffuse type Intestinal type

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    2

    Revisiting pathology: clinical perspectives

    Bittoni A et al. PLoS One 2013

    From pathology to genetics

    Tan IB et al. Gastroenterology 2011

    • Gene expression profiling for 37 gastric cancer cell lines• Two major intrinsic subtypes identified (171 gene set): Genomic‐Intestinal vs. Genomic‐Diffuse• Concordance between genomic (G‐INT and G‐DIF) and pathological (INT and DIF) findings: 64%

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    3

    Ready for clinical application?

    Tan IB et al. Gastroenterology 2011

    From pathology to genetics: molecular subtypes

    Lei Z et al. Gastroenterology 2013

    Mesenchymal Proliferative MetabolicDiffuse vs. Intestinal vs. Mixed

    58.2% ‐ 29.2% ‐ 11.9% 17.3% ‐ 73.6% ‐9.1%

    40.6% ‐ 53.6% ‐5.8%

    Pathway activation EMT, TGFβ, VEGF, NF‐κB, mTOR, SHH, CSC

    E2F, MYC, and RAS SPEM

    Amplified genes ‐ CCNE1, MYC, ERBB2, KRAS

    Methyled CpGs, hyper vs. hypo

    84.6% ‐ 15.4% 57.8% ‐ 42.2% 76.1% ‐ 23.9%

    TP53mutations low high low

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    4

    TCGA: molecular subtypes

    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nature 2014    

    ≈9%

    ≈22%

    ≈20%

    ≈50%

    TCGA: limitations

    • Limited follow up for the examined patients

    limitations in the interpretation of the prognostic role

    • No clear distinction of different driver molecular alterations among different subgroups

    anticipated limited role in the prediction of benefit from targeted agents

    • Subgroups evaluated on resected specimens

    different prevalence of subgroups between localized and advanced settings

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    5

    • 50% of cases• Mostly in the GEJ• Related with intestinal type and copy number gains of

    chr 8q, 17q and 20q• “loss or gain of functions of some key genes (oncogene

    or tumorsuppressor)”• Enriched in mutations of TP53 and RTK• Amplifications of cell cycle genese (ex Cyclin E1, …)

    Key molecular events: HER2 amplification

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    6

    TOGA: trastuzumab in HER2 positive disease

    Bang YJ et al. Lancet 2010

    TOGA: HER-2 status and clinical parameters

    Van Cutsem E et al. Gastric Cancer 2015

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    7

    Risk of inadequate selection: failure of lapatinib

    LOGiC (first‐line) TyTAN (second‐line)

    Hecht JR et al. ASCO Ann Meeting 2013 (LBA 4001)Satoh T et al. J Clin Oncol 2014

    Risk of inadequate selection: TyTAN subgroups

    Satoh T et al. J Clin Oncol 2014

    PFS in HER‐2 3+ by IHC OS in HER‐2 3+ by IHC

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    8

    Her-2 status sufficient for all anti-HER-2 agents?

    Second-lineGATSBY: paclitaxel vs trastuzumab emtansine, 412 patients

    First‐line

    JACOB: capecitabine, cisplatin and trastuzumab + / – pertuzumab, 780 patients. PUBLISHED LANCET ONCOLOGY 2018

    HELOISE: capecitabine, cisplatin and 2 dose levels of trastuzumab, 400 patients. JCO 2017

    FAIL

    What if we do not select? Failure of anti-EGFR Abs

    Waddell T et al. Lancet Oncol 2013

    EXPAND (Cape + Cis +/‐ Cetuximab) REAL‐3 (EOC +/‐ Panitumumab)

    Lordick F et al. Lancet Oncol 2013

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    9

    Key molecular event: KRAS and BRAF

    • KRAS : < 5% og GC• BRAF: 2% (mostly V599M, unknown role)

    Key molecular event: FGFR2

    • FGFR2 amplification occurs in almost 10% of gastric cancer cases and is associated with higher FGFR2 expression

    • Trials ongoing: ex. Dovitinib (TKI258): multitargeting oral TKI with potent inhibitory activity against bFGF receptors 1, 2, 3, VEGF receptors 1, 2, 3, PDGFR and c‐ KIT

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    10

    Key molecular event: c-MET

    • MET copy number alteration and over‐expression reported in a variable number of gastric cancer cases

    no standard methods for assessment

    •Good correlation between gene number alteration by ISH and expr. by IHC

    IHC 0 IHC 2+ IHC 3+

    disomy high polysomy gene amplification

    MET: negative prognostic role

    Peng Z et al. PLoS One 2014

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    11

    MET and resistance to anti-EGFR/HER2

    De Silva N et al. Br J Cancer 2015

    • Patients with HER2+ esophago-gastric cancer treated for 10 days with lapatinib and then with XELOX + lapatinib. Endoscopic samples were taken for molecular analysis at:

    baseline including for ex vivo culture +/- lapatinib to predict in vivo response post-lapatinib monotherapy at surgery

    • Significant correlation between the activation of MET with the level of P-Erk and P-PI3K:T-PI3K (total PI3K) ratio MET is likely to be a significant mechanism of lapatinib resistance in vivo

    MET and gastric cancer: the end of the beginning?

    1Cunningham D et al. ASCO Ann Meeting 2015 (abstr. 4000)2Shah MA et al. ASCO Ann Meeting 2015 (abstr. 4012)

    Study Arms (n) RR p PFS (mos)

    HR OS (mos) HR

    RILOMET‐11 ECX + Placebo 39.2% 5.7 11.5

    ECX + Rilotumumab 30% 0.027

    5.7 1.30 9.6 1.37

    METGastric2 FOLFOX + Placebo 41% 6.8 11.3

    FOLFOX + Onartuzumab 46% 0.253

    6.7 0.90 11.0 0.82

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    12

    Key molecular event: VEGF and VEGFR-2

    • VEGF frequently amplified in CIN subtype

    1Ohtsu A et al. J Clin Oncol 20112Fuchs CS et al. Lancet 20143Wilke H et al. Lancet Oncol 2014

    Study Arms (n) Line RR p PFS (mos)

    HR OS (mos)

    HR

    AVAGAST1 FP + Placebo First 37.4% 5.3 10.1

    FP + Bevacizumab 46% 0.031 6.7 0.80 12.1 0.87

    REGARD2 Placebo Second 3% 1.3 3.8

    Ramucirumab 3% 0.76 2.1 0.483 5.2 0.776

    RAINBOW3

    Paclitaxel + Placebo Second 16% 2.9 7.4

    Paclitaxel + Ramucirumab 28%

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    13

    MSI in gastric cancer

    • Therapeutic options:• Pembrolizumab: 50% RR• Nivolumab

    • MSI-H and EBV positive tumors are mutually exclusive• Dramatic responses seen with pembrolizumab (Nat med 2018)

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    14

    PDL1 as a biomarker ??

    Phase 3 KEYNOTE-181 Study (NCT02564263)

    Presented By Takashi Kojima at 2019 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium

    Overall Survival (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

    Presented By Takashi Kojima at 2019 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    15

    Overall Survival (SCC)

    Presented By Takashi Kojima at 2019 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium

    Overall Survival (ITT)

    Presented By Takashi Kojima at 2019 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    16

    KN-181 had 3 co-primary endpoints

    Presented By Harry Yoon at 2019 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium

    What in the genomic stable?

    • Claudine 18.2: • Tight junction protein, expressed in several cancers including

    GC• Zolbetuximab (anti-Claudine 18.2) is being evaluated in a

    phase 3 trial (Spotlight study)

  • BGDO Digestive Oncology Course 2019 Molecular pathology: upper GI cancerHans Prenen

    17

    THANK YOU !