mohid-glm : code developments for 3d waves-current ...€¦ · mohid-glm : code developments for 3d...
TRANSCRIPT
MOHID-GLM : code developments for 3D waves-current interactions
Implementation of the glm2-RANS equations by Ardhuin et al. 2008
MOHIDing workshop – 7-8 June, 2018 – Lisbon, Portugal
Matthias Delpey - SUEZ
Center Rivages Pro Tech [email protected]
Need for 3D wave-current implementation
3D features in the flow may be generated by multiple factors
Density stratification by continental freshwater outflows
Wind-induced circulation
Vertical shear in rip currents
Surface gravity waves have a large impact on nearshore circulation
in energetic environments
Wave setup
Longshore currents
Rip currents
Horiztonal & vertical mixing
Etc.
Need for 3D models including the effect of waves
Motivations
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 2 I
The difficulty of including waves in phase-averaged 3D models
Decomposition of flow components
Objective = representing interactions between mean flow and oscillating flow (momentum, mass, energy)
Problem: it is difficult to apply an Eulerian average on phases in 3D
Issue
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 3 I
Main principle
Derive new equations using a Lagrangian coordinate change,
from the mean position X to the instantaneous position X + ξ
Allows to « follow » the oscillatory mouvement
Generalized Lagrangian Mean (Andrews & McIntyre, 1978)
New mean advection velocity + new Lagrangian derivation operator
Application of the GLM to the RANS equations
Ardhuin et al. 2008 : asymptotic formulation of GLM equations for surface
gravity waves Development order 2
Small wave steepness
Limited vertical shear of the mean current
Slowly varying propagation environment
The Generalized Lagrangian Mean approach
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 4 I
( , ) ( ( , ), )L
x t x x t t
GLM2-RANS equations
Momentum equation
The Generalized Lagrangian Mean approach
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 5 I
, ,
1 H
S S S m x d x
u uu vu wu p u v Jf v fV U V F F
t x y z x x x x
where: u is now the GLM velocity (= tracer advection velocity)
US, VS = Stokes drift components
u = u – US = quasi-Eulerian current
pH = hydrostatic pressure
J = wave-induced pressure (barotropic)
Fm,x = momentum flux from the turbulent mixing
Fd,x = momentum flux induced by wave breaking
f = Coriolis parameter
GLM2-RANS equations
Wave induced pressure
3D Stokes drift
Wave-breaking induced flux of momentum:
Given by the wave model as an input to MOHID
The Generalized Lagrangian Mean approach
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 6 I
sinh(2 )
kEJ g
kD
cosh(2 2 )( , ) (cos ,sin )
sinh ²( )S S
kz khU V k E
kD
, ,( , ) (cos ,sin ) ( , )( , )
oc x oc y w oc
gS f dfd
C f
GLM2-RANS equations
Mass equation
The Generalized Lagrangian Mean approach
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 7 I
where: u is now the GLM velocity (= tracer advection velocity)
US, VS = Stokes drift components
η mean free surface elevation
D total water depth
upper bar = vertical integration
( ) ( )0s sD u U D v V
t x y
GLM2-RANS equations
Surface boundary condition
Bottom boundary condition
The Generalized Lagrangian Mean approach
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 8 I
( ) ( )s s Su U v V w Wt x y
, ,M a aw
uK
z
h hu v w
x y
,M D cw
uK C u u
t
With w the vertical component of the quasi-Eulerian velocity
WS the vertical components of the Stokes drift (given by the wave model)
τa,α = total wind stress
τ aw,α = wind stress supported by waves (given by the wave model)
Implementation of MOHID-GLM
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 9 I
MOHID Water modifications
Conservative formulation
Reading of additional forcing variables (Module Waves)
Compute Us, Vs from the frequency spectrum of the
Stokes Drift (Module Waves)
Add Us, Vs in advection terms (Module Hydrodynamic)
Add contribution of J and Fd in the momentum equation
(Module Hydrodynamic)
Modify boundary conditions (Modules Hydrodynamic,
InterfaceWaterAir, InterfaceSedimentWater)
Modify surface boundary conditions for TKE equation
in the k-epsilon model (Modules GOTM and
InterfaceWaterAir)
For detailed discretization see: Delpey 2012.
Implementation of MOHID-GLM
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 10 I
Mass conservation:
Horizonal momentum conservation:
Tracer equation:
Vertical advection velocity:
Haas & Warner 2009 case
Validation of MOHID GLM
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 11 I
Haas & Warner 2009 case
Validation of MOHID GLM
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 12 I
Application to the Uhabia beach, SW France
Real case application
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 13 I
Application to the Uhabia beach, SW France
Real case application
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 14 I
Application to the Uhabia beach, SW France
Real case application
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 15 I
Drifter observation Model
Exponential vertical decrease of radiation stress
No theoritical justification « Empirical »
Principle: consistant with barotropic balance + having a vertical distribution « a bit more plausible » than using
homogeous vertical distribution of wave radiation stree
Allows to produce some features like undertow See e.g. Franz et al. 2017
A (very) simplified formulation
MOHIDing 2018 - 7-8 June, 2018 - Lisbon [M. Delpey] 16 I
'( , , ) ( , )kz
ij ijk kh
keS x y z S x y
e e
k = wave number, h = depth, η = free surface elevation
MOHID-GLM : code developments for 3D waves-current interactions
Implementation of the glm2-RANS equations by Ardhuin et al. 2008
MOHIDing workshop – 7-8 June, 2018 – Lisbon, Portugal
Matthias Delpey - SUEZ
Center Rivages Pro Tech [email protected]