module: rural sociology (4 ects credits; 50 – 60 student contact

1

Module: Rural Sociology (4 ECTS credits; 50 – 60 student contact hours)

1. Rationale Sociological and demographic characteristics of rural population, rural social groups, and rural culture are key resources for rural development. Research and development methods enable an understanding of these factors and build competencies for work in the area of improvement of quality of life in rural areas.

2. Content 1. Sociological and demographic characteristics of the rural population: basic demographic categories in rural population; household characteristics; demographic transition; deagrarianisation, depopulation (ageing population, empty villages); migrations and migration characteristics

2. Social groups in rural areas: elderly people; rural youth – situation, problems, importance for local rural communities development; rural families; women in rural areas; agriculture cooperatives in terms of rural development

3. Poverty, social exclusion and gender issues: forms and characteristics of poverty; forms and reasons for social exclusion; marginalized social groups; family and gender issues in rural communities; ways of tackling social exclusion

4. Endogenous and exogenous factors of rural development: top-down and bottom-up rural development; the ”neoendogenous” approach; territorial rural development and local partnerships

5. Concepts of extension work (organisational stages, purpose and essence of extension)

6. Extension methods (individual, group, mass)

7. Methods of social enquiry (data collecting, analysis and interpretation; including participatory research methods)

8. Participatory approach and methods

9. History of agrarian relations in past 100 years; agrarian reforms at different periods and their impact on the current agrarian structure; comparison with EU experience and practice (to learn lessons)

10. Rural culture: tradition, local knowledge, transfer of knowledge between generations, innovation processes, attitudes, behavioural norms, religion, tension between traditional and globalised external culture, culture as a resource for local development

3. Learning outcomes

After successful completion of the module, students will:

understand the problems caused by socio-demographic structures and trends of rural population and their potential as a baseline for rural development.

2

understand needs, aspirations and problems of different social groups in rural areas.

be able to analyse family and gender issues and identify specificities of poverty in rural areas as well as reasons for social exclusion and its consequences for rural development, and be aware of ways of tackling poverty and exclusion

be able to identify the importance of various factors for development of local communities and to use this knowledge in rural development planning process.

understand the concept of extension service, necessity for its establishment and role in project implementation

be able to implement different extension methods depending the content and problem they need to resolve

be able to use a range of social research methods appropriately

be able to plan and use best possible method & approach in order to investigate, analyse and make recommendations to community leaders, governmental bodies and different interested parties.

gain skills to communicate with target groups with different interests and levels of understanding

have a basic knowledge of agrarian relations and reforms, and of previous and current agrarian structures, in the WB

recognise culture as an important resource for development and its role in social change in rural areas

4. Teaching and learning methods

interactive lectures

visiting speakers from different stakeholder groups

handouts and guided reading

field visits

case studies relevant to particular areas, contexts and production systems:

o socio-ecological problems, sustainable development and organic agriculture

field visit to analyse change, innovation, attitudes, etc., in a specific setting; and write a report / presentation

student research and presentations

practical exercises

participatory workshops/work in groups

3

Reading list for RURAL SOCIOLOGY module:

* Students will use selected literature (basic and extended) for the exam preparation in specific subjects, for seminar papers, guided reading etc. Reading list is neither complete nor all of the given literature will be used (read) by all of the students.

1. Sociological and demographic characteristics of the rural population: basic demographic categories in rural population; household characteristics; demographic transition; deagrarization, depopulation (ageing population, empty villages); migrations and migration characteristics

a. Characteristics of the traditional rural demographic structure (rural population, rural youth, women, old people, farmers...)

b. Changes in traditional rural demographic structure – demographic transition; natality, mortality, fertility, ageing index, migrations...)

c. Farms and rural households (basic characteristics; modernization; diversification)

d. Deagrarization, industrialization, urbanization, globalization

e. Depopulation of rural areas, Rural migrations, counter urbanization

f. Social implication of changes in rural demographic structure

Basic literature

Mitrović, M. (1998). Sociologija sela. SDS. Beograd.

Grupa autora (2005) Porodična gazdinstva Srbije u promenama. Poljoprivredni fakultet – Institut za agroekonomiju. Beograd

Stanovništvo. (1999). Vol. 37, No. 1-4.

Bobić, M. (2007). Demografija i sociologija. Veza ili sinteza. Službeni glasnik. Beograd.

Cvejić, S., Babović, M., Petrović, M., Bogdanov, N., Vuković, O., (2010), Socijalna isključenost u ruralnim oblastima Srbije, UNDP Srbija, Sektor za inkluzivni razvoj, Beograd

Bogdanov, Natalija (2007). Mala ruralna domaćinstva u Srbiji i ruralna nepoljoprivredna ekonomija. UNDP. Beograd.

Woods, M. (2005). Rural Geography. Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Reconstructing. Sage Publications. London.

Overbeek, G. and Ida, Terluin (2006). Rural Areas Under Urban Pressure. Case studies of rural-urban relationships across Europe. LEI Wageningen UR. RURBAN project report.

4

2. Social groups in rural areas:

elderly people

a. indicators and consequences of ageing of rural population,

b. social position, family position and role of elderly population in traditional and modern village,

c. possibilities and needs of social and health protection of elderly people in rural areas,

d. family and social care for elderly people in rural areas


Miladinović M., (2010). Stari u selu – ruralnosociološko istraživanje u selima Srednjeg Banata. Poljoprivredni fakultet. Novi Sad.

Jakič-Kozarčanin, L. (2003). Starost između države i porodice. Službeni glasnik. Beograd.

Bovoar S. de, (1987), Starost I, II, BIGZ, Beograd

Đurić, V., (1972), Jedan teorijski okvir za empirijsko izučavanje staračkih poljoprivrednih domaćinstava, Sociologija sela, Stari ljudi u selu (tematski broj), godina X, srpanj-prosinac, br. 37-38, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede i sociologiju sela, Zagreb, str. 50-65

Leeson, G., (2003), Poverty in old age: an international perspective, Oxford briefing paper, october, No 3, Oxford Institute of Ageing, University of Oxford

Livada, S., (1972), Naše društvo i stari seljaci, Sociologija sela, Stari ljudi u selu (tematski broj), godina X, srpanj-prosinac, br. 37-38, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede i sociologiju sela, Zagreb, str. 5-14

Manojlović, P. i saradnici, (1980), Stari na selu i njihovi socijalni problemi, Institut za socijalnu politiku, Beograd

Minoa, Ž., (1994), Istorija starosti: od antike do renesanse, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad

Vuksanović G., (1994), Stari seljaci, Studija o staračkim poljoprivrednim domaćinstvima u opštini Novi Sad, Feljton, Novi Sad

__________________________________________________________

rural youth

a. situation, problems, importance for local rural communities development;

b. rural youth as social group;

c. social and family position of rural youth in traditional and modern village;

d. value orientation of rural youth;

e. conflicts of needs, expectations and aspirations of rural youth and (in)possibility of

realization of aspirations in rural areas;

f. rural youth as a factor of rural development;

g. perspectives of rural youth in rural areas and migratory tendencies.

5

Marković – Krstić, S., (2009), Teorijski pristupi i orijentacije u proučavanju omladine, Godišnjak za sociologiju, god.V, br.5, Filozofski fakultet, Niš.

Ilišin, V., Radin, F. (ur.), (2002), Mladi uoči trećeg milenija, Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu, Državni zavod za zaštitu obitelji, materinstva i mladeži, Zagreb

Jentsch, B., Shucksmith, M., (ed.), (2004), Young people in Rural Areas of Europe, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hants, England, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, USA

Shucksmith, M., (2004), Young people and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 44, No.1, European Society for Rural Sociology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, Malden, USA

Dilić, E. (ur.), (1977), Seoska omladina danas, Rezultati istraživanja u SR Hrvatskoj, Centar za sociologiju sela, grada i prostora Instituta za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb

Joksimović, S. i drugi, (1988), Mladi i neformalne grupe, U traganju za alternativom, Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije, Centar za idejni rad SSO Beograda, Beograd

Kapor Stanulović N., (1988), Na putu ka odraslosti, Psihički razvoj i psihosocijalni aspekti zdravlja mladih, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd

Marković – Krstić, S., (2008), Fenomen omladine u društveno-istorijskom kontekstu, Godišnjak za sociologiju, god.IV, br.4, Filozofski fakultet, Niš

Shucksmith, M., Chapman, P., (1998), Rural Development and Social Exclusion, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 38, No.2, European Society for Rural Sociology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, Malden, USA

Vidojković, D., Živković, J., (ur.), (1995), Mladi na selu, Centar 018, Niš

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1962). Pisma sa sela. Beograd: Savremena škola

__________________________________________________________

rural families; women in rural areas

a. Rural women and motherhood: historical view

b. Reproductive behaviour of rural women; Birth control and reproductive health care

c. Working role of rural women and role conflict

d. Growing up and relations in family house

e. Marital and extramarital relations in village

f. Education of rural children

Isić, Momčilo (2008). Seljanka u Srbiji i prvoj polovini 20. veka. Beograd: Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava. Milić, Anđelka (2001). Sociologija porodice. Beograd: Čigoja. Novakov, Marina (2011). Porodični i društveni položaj majke u selu. Novi Sad:Poljoprivredni fakultet. Tomanović, Smiljka (priredila) (2006). Društvo u previranju – Sociološke studije nekih aspekata društvene transformacije u Srbiji. Beograd: ISI FF.

Tripković, Gordana (2005). Tragom porodice. Novi Sad: Stylos.

Kazer, Karl (2002). Porodica i srodstvo na Balkanu: Analiza jedne kulture koja nestaje. Beograd: Udruženje za društvenu istoriju.

Milić, Anđelka (priredila) (2004). Društvena transformacija i strategije društvenih grupa: Svakodnevica Srbije na početku trećeg milenijuma. Beograd: ISI FF.

Ristović, Milan (priredio) (2007). Privatni život kod Srba u XX veku. Beograd: Clio.

6

Segalan, Martin (2009). Sociologija porodice. Beograd: Clio.

Erlih, Vera (1971). Jugoslovenska porodica u transformaciji: studija u tri stotine sela. Zagreb: Liber.

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1983). Istorija seljačkog društva III – sociologija seljačkih radova. Beograd: SANU.

Sociologija sela (1973), br. 2-4 (40-42), godina XI, Zagreb.

Stojanov, Mladen (1989). Seoska žena u privrednom razvoju. ZMS DN, br. 86/87, Novi Sad.

Tripković, Milan (1989). Žena i tradicija. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, broj 86/87, Novi Sad.

First, Ruža (1981). Seoska porodica danas – kontinuitet ili promjene. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

Fotić, Aleksandar (priredio) (2005). Privatni život u srpskim zemljama u osvit modernog doba. Beograd: Clio.

__________________________________________________________

Agricultural cooperatives in terms of rural development

a. Social conditions of appearance of the cooperative movement

b. Areas of cooperation and institutionalization of the cooperative movement

c. Cooperative movement among the Serbian agriculturalists

d. Post-socialist transformations and agricultural cooperatives

e. Agricultural cooperatives and rural development

Šljukić, S. (2004). Sociološki aspekti razvoja zemljoradničkog zadrugarstva u bivšim socijalističkim zemljama jugoistočne Evrope. Odbranjena doktorska disertacija. Biblioteka Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu. Novi Sad.

Šljukić, S. (2009). Seljak i zadruga u ravnici. Mediterran Publishing. Novi Sad.

März, U, Böttcher, D. and M. Fianu (2009). Struktura i uprava Poljoprivrednih zadruga u istočnoj Evropi. Priručnik za implementaciju. GTZ.

7

3. Poverty, social exclusion and gender issues: forms and characteristics of poverty; forms and reasons for social exclusion; marginalized social groups; family and gender issues in rural communities; ways of tackling social exclusion

a. forms and characteristics of poverty: definition and characteristics of absolute and relative poverty, material and social deprivation in rural areas, quality of life and life standard in rural areas

b. forms and reasons for social exclusion; definition of social exclusion; forms and dimensions of social exclusion; residential factors of social exclusion; poverty and social exclusion, specifics of social exclusion in rural areas; consequences of social exclusion in rural areas

c. marginalized social groups: social position and social inequalities, marginal social groups; sensitive social groups in rural areas (elderly, rural youth, rural women); forms and sources of marginalization of sensitive social groups

d. politics for reduction of social exclusion and poverty alleviation in EU and R. Of Serbia; possibilities of application and limitations on the local level

Basic literature

Cvejić, S., Babović, Marija, Petrović, Mina, Bogdanov, Natalija i Olivera, Vuković (2010). Socijalna isključenost u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. UNDP. Beograd

Bogdanov, Natalija (2008). Poljoprivreda. Ruralno siromaštvo u Srbiji. U Vukmirović, D. i Rachel, Smith Govoni (ur). Studija o životnom standardu. Srbija 2002-2007. Republički zavod za statistiku. Beograd.

Tim za socijalno uključivanje i smanjenje siromaštva Vlade Republike Srbije i SECONS (2009). Kurs o socijalnoj uključenosti. http://www.inkluzijakurs.info/onlinekurs.php


Cloke, P, Marsden, T. and P. H. Mooney (ed). Handbook of rural studies. Sage Publications. London.

Saraceno, C., (2001), Social Exclusion. Cultural Roots and Diversities of a popular Concept, Conference Social Exclusion and Children, Columbia University (http://www.childpolicyintl.org/publications)

Sen, A., (2000), Social Exclusion: Concept, Application and Scrutiny,Social Development Papers No.1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Manila

Šporer, Ž., (2004), Koncept društvene isključenosti, Društvena istraživanja, God. 13, br. 1-2, Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, Zagreb

Šućur, Z., (2004), Socijalna isključenost: pojam, pristupi i operacionalizacija, Revija za sociologiju, Vol. 35, No.1-2, Hrvatsko sociološko društvo, Zagreb

Bock, B., S. Shortall (2006). Rural Gender Relations – Issues and case studies. UK: CABI Publishing.

Bock, B. (2010). Personal and social development of women in rural areas of Europe. European Parliament. Brussels.

Korać, Maja (1991), Zatočenice pola. Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd

Blagojević, Marina (2010), Žene na selu u Vojvodini. Pokrajinski zavod za ravnopravnost polova, Novi Sad

Gidens, E., (2003), Sociologija, Ekonomski fakultet, Beograd

Atkinson, А. B., (1998), Social Exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment, u: Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity, Atkinson, A., B., Hills, J. (ed.), Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London

http://www.inkluzijakurs.info/onlinekurs.php

http://www.childpolicyintl.org/publications

8

Lessof, C., Jowell, R., (2000), Measuring Social Exclusion, CREST, Working Paper, No. 84, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford

Reimer, B., (2004), Social Exclusion in a Comparative Context, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 44, Number 1, European Society for Rural Sociology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, Malden, USA

Sen, A., (2002), Razvoj kao sloboda, Filip Višnjić, Beograd

Sliver, H., (1994), Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms, International Labour Review, Vol. 133, No. 5-6, International Labour Organization, Geneve

Sliver, H., (2007), The process of social exclusion: the dynamics of an evolving concept, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Working Paper 95, Department of Sociology, Brown University, USA

Shucksmith, M., Chapman, P., (1998), Rural Development and Social Exclusion, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 38, No.2, European Society for Rural Sociology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, Malden, USA

Tomić, V., (2007), Siromaštvo i socijalna isključenost - osnovne definicije i indikatori, Sociološka luča, Časopis za sociologiju, socijalnu antropologiju, socijalnu demografiju i socijalnu psihologiju, god. I, br.2, Filozofski fakultet, Nikšić

Haralambos, M., Holborn, M., (2002), Sociologija: Teme i perspektive, Golden marketing, Zagreb

Commins, P., (2004), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas: Characteristics, Processes and Research Issues, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 44, No.1, European Society for Rural Sociology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, Malden, USA

9

4. Endogenous and exogenous factors of rural development: top-down and bottom-

up rural development; the ”neoendogenous” approach; territorial rural development and local partnerships

a. Characteristics of endogenous and exogenous R.D. development model

b. Rural development: from top-down to bottom-up approach

c. Theories of modernization; modernization of agriculture

d. ”Neo-endogenous” approach in R.D.

e. R.D. from agricultural to rural policies; from sectoral to place-based policies in rural areas

f. Territorial rural development: basic principles and dimensions

g. Regional rural development

h. Local partnerships for rural development

Basic literature and extended reading

Jankovic, D. (2011). Sociološki aspekti razvoja lokalnih seoskih zajednica. Odbranjena doktorska disertacija. Biblioteka Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu.

Ploeg, J. D. van der and G. van, Dijk (eds). Beyond modernization. The impact of endogenous rural development. Royal Van Gorcum. Assen

Ploeg, J. D. van der and H. Renting (2000). Impact and potential: a comparative review of European rural development practices. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 40 (4). P. 529-543.

Ploeg, J.D. van der and A. Long (1994). Endogenous development: practices and perspectives. In Ploeg, J. D. van der and Ann, Long (eds). Born from within. Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Royal Van Gorcum. Assen.

Ploeg, J. D. van der, Renting, H., Brunori, B., Knickel, K., Mannion, J.. Marsden, Terry, de Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E. and Flaminia, Ventura (2000). Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis. 40 (4). P. 931-408

Lowe, P. (2003). Neo-Endogenous Development, Territory and Rural Innovation. Internet stranica: http://www.sociologia.unical.it/rural_areas/paper/eng/lowe.ppt .

Shucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in UK. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 40 (2). P. 208-218

Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 50 (1). P. 1-14.

Schejtman, A. and J. Berdegué (2008). Towards a territorial approach for rural development. IPPG Discussion Paper Series. No. 17. Manchester.

Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks a new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies. Vol.16 (4). P. 407-419

Ray, C (2000). The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis.Vol. 40 (2). P.163-171.

OECD (2003). The future of rural policy. From sectoral to place-based policies in rural areas. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

http://www.sociologia.unical.it/rural_areas/paper/eng/lowe.ppt

10

Long, N. (1984). Creating space for change: A perspective on the sociology of development. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 24 (3/4). P. 168-184.

Long, N. and J. D. van der Ploeg (1989). Demythologizing planned intervention: An actor perspective. Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 29 (3-4). P. 226-249.

Long, N. (2006). Development sociology. Actor perspectives. Routlege. London and New York.



Rauch, T. Bartels, M. and A. Engel (2001). Regional rural development: a regional response to rural poverty. GTZ-BMZ.

Ray, C. (2000a). Endogenous socio-economic development and trustful relationships: partnerships, social capital and individual agency. Centre for Rural Economy Working Paper Series. Working Paper 45. Newcastle.

Ray, C. (2000b). Endogenous socio-economic development in the European union - issues of evaluation. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 447-458.

Ray, C. (2006b). Culture Economies: a perspective on local rural development in Europe. Centre for Rural Economy. Newcastle.

Slee, B. (1993). Endogenous development; a concept in search of a theory. CIHEAM – Options Mediterraneennes. Strengthening endogenous developmen patterns in European agriculture. Ser. A. No. 23.

Moseley, M. (ed.) (2003). Local partnerships for rural development – The European experience. CABI Publishing.

prof. dr Natalija Bogdanov, dr Bojan Zečević, Antonella Versaci, Ján Roháč (2011). Javno – privatno partnerstvo u ruralnom turizmu. UNDP. Beograd

De Janvry, A., Murgai R. and Elisabeth, Sadoulet (2002). Rural Development and Rural Policy. U Rausser, G. and R. Just (ed). Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Elsevier. Amsterdam.

De Janvry, A. and Elisabeth, Sadoulet (2005). Achieving success in rural development: toward implementation of an integral approach. Agricultural Economics. Vol. 32 (1). P. 75 – 89.

De Janvry, A. and Elisabeth, Sadoulet (2007). Toward a territorial approach to rural development. eJADE. Vol. 4 (1). P. 66-98.

Derkzen, Petra (2008). The politics of rural governance. Case studies of rural partnerships in the Netherlands and Wales. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen University

J. Čikić, Ž. Petrović (2010) Organska proizvodnja i poljoprivredna gazdinstva Srbije – ruralnosociološka analiza. Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad, str. 1-145. ISBN: 978-86-7520-187-8

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117962754/home

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118695086/issue

11

5. Concepts of extension work (organisational stages, purpose and essence of extension)

a. Extension science: from multidisciplinary to interdisciplinary concept; Agricultural extension as a factor of agricultural and rural development; Agricultural extension – historical view

b. Different models of organization and finance of extension; Transformation of extension systems; Institutions and actors in extension; Experiences of extension in different countries;

c. Definitions of agricultural extension; Goals and functions of agricultural extension; Social determinism, networks and extension process

d. Specifics of communication, perception and defence mechanisms in extension process; Communication models and construction of the meaning; Behaviour and behaviour modification; Communication for rural innovation, intervention and participation, social learning, negotiation; Extension and education; Extension and research;

e. Transfer of technology and extension; Knowledge and information – from local, traditional knowledge to „modern“ agricultural knowledge and information systems: possibility of interaction;

f. Agricultural extension in Serbia; Farmer population in Serbia and specifics of socio-economic context of extension in Serbia

Basic literature

Petrović, Ž. I D. Janković (2010). Poljoprivredno savetodavstvo Srbije – stanje, problemi i mogućnosti reforme. Poljoprivredni fakultet Novi Sad.

Petrović et. al (2007). Sistem informacija u poljoprivrednom savetodavstvu Vojvodine. Poljoprivredni fakultet u Novom Sadu. Novi Sad.

J. Čikić, Ž. Petrović (2010). Organska proizvodnja i poljoprivredna gazdinstva Srbije – ruralnosociološka analiza. Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad, str. 1-145. ISBN: 978-86-7520-187-8

Janković, D. Ž. Petrović, J. Čikić (2010). Karakteristike savetodavnog procesa u radu sa odabranim gazdinstvima u Vojvodini. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. vol. 57, br. 2, str. 257 - 274. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK 631.153:631.115.1(497.113)

Janković, D. Ž. Petrović, J. Čikić (2010). Karakteristike savetodavnog procesa u radu sa odabranim gazdinstvima u Vojvodini. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. vol. 57, br. 2, str. 257 - 274. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK 631.153:631.115.1(497.113)

Petrović, Ž., D. Janković, J. Čikić (2010). Problems in the extension work and farmers` needs in Serbia. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. Vol. 57, SI-1, p. 91-98. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK: 631.11.1(497.11)

Petrović, Ž., D. Janković (2010). Characteristics of land tenancy on family farms in Vojvodina. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. Vol. 57, SI-2 (1-656), p. 571-577. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK 347.453:631.1.017.3(497.113)

Čikić, J., Ž. Petrović, D. Janković (2010). Unutrašnji činioci modernizacije rada u poljoprivredi na odabranim gazdinstvima u Vojvodini. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. Vol. 57, br. 3, Beograd, str. 449-461. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK: 631.115.1:005.591.6(497.113)

12

Čikić, J., Ž. Petrović (2010). Znanje kao činilac unapređenja organske proizvodnje na gazdinstvima Vojvodine. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke. br. 133, str. 86-97. ISSN: 0352-5732, UDK: 338.434(497.113)

Ž. Petrović, D. Janković (2007). Agricultural extension of the AKIS in Serbia/Vojvodina. In: Proceedings of 100th EAAE Seminar Development of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Central and Eastern Europe. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists (SAAE), s. 615-621. ISBN: 978-86-86087-05-8, UDK: 631(4-12)(082) 338.43(4-12)(082) 316.334.3(4-12)(082)

Hoffman, V., Gerster-Bentaya, M. Christink, A. and M. Lema (Ed.)(2009). Rural Extension. Basic concepts and issues. VOL: 1. MARGRAF PUBLISHERS.

Hoffman, V., Christink, A. and M. Lema (Ed.)(2009). Rural Extension. Examples and Background materials. VOL. 2. MARGRAF PUBLISHERS

Leeuwis, C. and van den Ban, A. W. (2005). Communication for rural innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell Publishing.

van den Ban, A.W & H. S. Hawkins (1996). Agricultural Extension. Second Edition. Blackwell Sceince.

Bolliger, E, Reinhard, P. and T. Zellweger (1994). Agricultural Extension. Guidelines for extension workers in rural areas. SKAT, St. Gallen.

Swanson, B.; Bentz, R.; Sofranko, A. (Ed.) (1998). Improving Agricultural Extension – A Reference Manual. FAO. Rome.

Ian Christoplos, Peta Sandison and Sanne Chipeta (2011). Guide to Extension Evaluation. GFRAS. LINDAU. Switzerland.

Nagel, U. J. (1979). Knowledge Flows in Agriculture: Linking Research, Extension and the Farmer. Zeitschrift für Ausländische Landwirtschaft. DLG – Verlag. Frankfurt (Main). Jahrgang 18. Heft 2.

Rölling, N. (1988). Extension Science – Information systems in agricultural development. Cambrige University Press. Cambrige.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, Fifth Edition. New York.

Adams, G., (2000). Effective management in extension advisory services in Central and Eastern European countries. FAO. Rome.

Bauer E.; Hoffmann, V.; Keller, P., (1998). Agricultural extenison down the ages. Agriculture &Rural development, No. 1.

Bolliger, E.; Reinharrd, P.; Zellweger, T., (1990). Agricultural extension: guidelines for extension workers in rural areas. SKAT. St.Gallen.

Brent, K. J.; Adams, G., (1999). Extenison, research and farm competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe. FAO. Rome.

Hoffman, V.; Lammers J.; Kidd, A., (2000). Reforming the organisation of agricultural extension in Germany: lessons from other countries. Agren.

Kidd, A.; Lamers, J.; Ficarelli, P; Hoffmann, V. (2000), „Privatising agricultural extension: caveat emptor“, Journal of Rural Studies, No.16.

Kidd, A.; Lamers, J.; Hoffman, V., (1998). Towards pluralism in agricultural extension - A growing challenge to the public and private sector“, Agriculture and rural development.

Rivera, W. M.; Zijp, W. (2002). Contracting for Agricultural Extension: International Case Studies and Emerging Practices. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

13

6. Extension methods (individual, group, mass)

a. Requirements of a good advisor

Methods of advisory work

b. Individual advisory (communication) methods; Specifics of individual communication and techniques of advisory conversation; Non-directive advisory communication

c. Group advisory (communication) methods; Specifics of groups and extension work with groups; Group discussions, extension groups/circles; Demonstrations; Excursions

d. Mass extension (communication) methods; Specifics of mass media and possibilities of information transfer; Specifics of communication through mass media in extension; Field days; Informative campaigns; Radio and TV; Printed material; Agricultural fairs; Exhibitions

Basic literature

van den Ban, A.W & H. S. Hawkins (1996). Agricultural Extension. Second Edition. Blackwell Sceince.

Hoffman, V., Gerster-Bentaya, M. Christink, A. and M. Lema (Ed.)(2009). Rural Extension. Basic concepts and issues. VOL: 1. MARGRAF PUBLISHERS.

Hoffman, V., Christink, A. and M. Lema (Ed.)(2009). Rural Extension. Examples and Background materials. VOL. 2. MARGRAF PUBLISHERS

Ian Christoplos, Peta Sandison and Sanne Chipeta (2011). Guide to Extension Evaluation. GFRAS. LINDAU. Switzerland.

Čikić, J., Ž. Petrović, D. Janković (2009). Metodi savetodavnog rada u funkciji unapređenja poljoprivrede na seoskim gazdinstvima Vojvodine. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. godina 56, broj 4, str. 577-587. ISSN: 0352-3462, UDK: 631.152(497.113)

14

7. Methods of social enquiry (data collecting, analysis and interpretation; including participatory research methods)

a. Scientific method (definition, method and methodology, elements of scientific method

b. Epistemological foundations of theoretical sciences (principles of scientific knowledge and methodology, scientific theory, scientific law, scientific explanation, social determinism

c. Organization of scientific research (research plan, theoretical and methodological framework, research methods and instruments, development of research instruments, research reports

d. Rural society as specific research field

e. Methods of social enquiry – basic characteristics/ elements, pros and cons: methods of gathering of information and data analysis

f. sampling

g. observations, interviewing, surveys, participatory techniques: types, preparation, conducting, threats

h. Measuring, classification, typologies, statistical analysis, secondary data sources and analysis

i. Experiment in social sciences; ex post facto experiments

j. Biography method; case studies; basics of multivariate analysis; comparative-historical method

k. Qualitative and quantitative research

Basic literature

Milić, Vojin, (1996), Sociološki metod, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd

Supek, Rudi, (1961), Ispitivanje javnog mnjenja, SNL, Zagreb

Mozer, C.A., (1962), Metodi anketiranja u istraživanju društvenih pojava, Kultura, Beograd

Rea, L. M. and R.A. Parker (1997). Designing and conducting survey research. A comprehensive guide. Second Editon. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Bo, S. i F. Veber (2005). Vodič kroz terensku anketu. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. Beograd.

Milovan Mitrović, (1999). Metodološko uputstvo za prikupljanje građe o društvenom životu savremenog srpskog sela. Matica srpska. Novi Sad.

Cvijić, J. (1896). Uputstva za proučavanje sela u Srbiji. Beograd.

Bogišić, V. (1866). Naputak za opisivanje pravnijeh običaja, koji u narodu živu. Beč-Zagreb.

15

8. Participatory approach and methods

a. Participatory approach – basic philosophy; importance and possibilities of application in research and education;

b. Critics of participatory approach

c. Participation and community development

d. Moderation and visualization for group events; Group facilitation mehtods

e. Participatory methods in rural and agricultural research

i. Basic characteristics of RRA, PRA, PLA,

ii. Interviewing; structured observations; mapping; ranking; timelines; “Problem three”, “Venn diagrams”….

Basic literature

Chambers, R.(1997). Whose reality counts, - putting the first last. IT Publications.

Selener, D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change. Cornell University. Ithaca. New York.

Pretty, N. J., Guijt, I., Thompson, J and I. Scoones. (?). Participatory Learning and Action. A trainers guide. Participatory Methodology Series.

Samardžija, J. (2004) Primena participativnih metoda u ruralnosociološkim istraživanjima i planiranju ruralnog razvoja. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, godina LI, broj 1-2, str. 103-118.

M. Kaul Shah, S. Gegnan Kambon, B. Monahan, (1999), A Step-by-step Field Guide to Participatory Tools and Techniques, in: «Embracing Participation in Development: Worldwide Experience from CARE's Reproductive Health Programmes», the United States Agency for International development, Atlanta

Oepen, M. (2003). Moderation and Visualization for Group Events. MOVE Manual. INVENT.

A. Neef, D. Neubert (2011) Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agric. Hum. Values. (28), pp. 179–194.

Gonsalves, J., et all. (eds) (2005) Participatory Research and Development for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management: A Sourcebook. Volume 1: Understanding Participatory Research and Development. International Potato Center-Users' Perspectives With Agricultural Research and Development, Laguna, Philippines and International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.

Julian Gonsalves et all. (eds.) (2005) Participatory Research and Development for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management - A SOURCEBOOK. VOLUME 3: Doing Participatory Research and Development. International Potato Center-Users' Perspectives With Agricultural Research and Development, Laguna, Philippines and International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.

16

9. History of agrarian relations in past 100 years; agrarian reforms at different periods and their impact on the current agrarian structure; comparison with EU experience and practice (to learn lessons)

a. Basic elements of agricultural and rural structure

b. Agrarian relations and their relevance; history of agrarian relations in Europe and Balkan peasant societies; feudalism: pronoia and feudal properites, peasant obligations; the turkish influence

c. Agrarian relations and agrarian reforms after the fist and second world wars

d. “recent history” of agrarian relations; transition / transformation of Balkan countries; agriculture and change of social structure

Basic literature


Šljukić, S. (2004). Društvena struktura u bivšim socijalističkim zemljama: tranzicija ili transformacija. Sociološki pregled XXXVIII (1-2): 267-279.

Šljukić, S. (2006). Agriculture and the Changes of the Social Structure: The Case of Serbia. Sociology XLVIII (2): 137-148.

Šljukić, S. (2010a). Istraživanja klasne/slojne strukture društva kao deo „matičnog toka“ sociologije. Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu XXXV-1: 65-74.

Šljukić, S. (2010b). Sociološki profil novih srpskih veleposednika. Nacionalni interes vol. 9 (3): 351- 366.

Šljukić, S. (2007). Zemlja kao resurs i društvena struktura severne srpske pokrajine Vojvodine. u Tripković, M, Pušić, Lj. i S. Šljukić. Raskršća Srbije. Mediterran Publishing. Novi Sad

Novaković, S. (1965). Selo. Srpska književna zadruga, Kolo LVIII. Knjiga 393. Beograd.

Lekić, B. (2002) Agrarna reforma i kolonizacija u Jugoslaviji 1918-1941. Beograd: Udruženje ratnih dobrovoljaca 1912-1918, njihovih potomaka i poštovalaca, Službeni list SRJ.

Gaćeša, N. (1984). Agrarna reforma i kolonizacija u Jugoslaviji 1945-1948. Matica srpska. Novi Sad.

Veselinov, D. (1987). Sumrak seljaštva. Beograd. Ekonomika.

Šljukić, S. (2009). Seljak i zadruga u ravnici. Novi Sad. Mediterran Publishing.

17

10. Rural culture: tradition, local knowledge, transfer of knowledge between

generations, innovation processes, attitudes, behavioural norms, religion, tension between traditional and globalised external culture, culture as a resource for local development

a. Rural culture: between tradition and innovation

b. Tradition, traditionalism, conservativism

c. Importance of local / indigenous knowledge in rural development; social innovations; social learning;

d. Traditional ways of knowledge transfer; the role of agricultural work, cultural heritage, traditions, customs, religion; social change and diffusion of innovations

e. Cultural patterns, social institutions and rural livelihoods; transformations of capital: from social, cultural to other forms of capital

f. Globalisation and local culture; culture as a resource for local development

g. History of peasant societies in Balkan countries

Basic literature


Mitrović, M., (1999). Srpsko selo. Prilog sociologiji tradicionalnog srpskog društva. Matica srpska. Novi Sad.

Haralambos, M., Holborn, M., (2002). Sociologija: Teme i perspektive. Golden marketing. Zagreb

Gidens, E., (2003). Sociologija. Ekonomski fakultet. Beograd

Koković, D. (2005). Pukotine kulture. Prometej. Novi Sad.



Ray, C. (2006b). Culture Economies: a perspective on local rural development in Europe. Centre for Rural Economy. Newcastle.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, Fifth Edition. New York.

Đurić, V. (1975). Inovacije u društvu. Gradina. Niš.

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1962). Pisma sa sela. Beograd: Savremena škola.

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1953). Istorija seljačkog društva I – organizovanje seljačke zemljišne svojine. Beograd: SANU.

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1965). Istorija seljačkog društva II – sociologija stanovanja. Beograd: SANU.

Vukosavljević, Sreten (1983). Istorija seljačkog društva III – sociologija seljačkih radova. Beograd: SANU.

module: rural sociology (4 ects credits; 50 – 60 student contact

Documents