module 4: the value of accurate text in cancer registry · the value of accurate text in cancer...

45
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries Atlanta, Georgia www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr NPCR Education and Training Series (NETS) Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Prepared by Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC) CDC Contract Number 2002002005760004

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNational Program of Cancer Registries

Atlanta, Georgiawww.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr

NPCR Education and Training Series (NETS)Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer

RegistryPrepared by Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC)

CDC Contract Number 200–2002–00576–0004

Page 2: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

2

The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry

Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules

October 21, 2008

Page 3: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

3

Purpose of Standardized Data

Consistency

Monitor patient trendsObserve referral patternsAllocate resources

Page 4: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

4

Importance of Standardized Data

Data Collection

Required data setsResearchMarketingFuture data requestsSpecial studiesAvoiding “unknowns”

Page 5: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

5

Codes vs. Supporting Text

WOMEN MEN

Page 6: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

6

Resolving Coding Discrepancies

Compare information

Hospital #1 – Patient J.R. Race: 01 White Hospital #2 – Patient J.R. Race: 02 Black

Hospital #3 – Patient M.P. C504 2 Left Hospital #4 – Patient M.P. C504 1 Right

Page 7: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

7

NAACCR Standards – Supporting Text

Standard 3.2.2 – Data Text

Text information should be:

included in the registry’s dataset

transmitted along with codes when tumor records are shared with other registries.

Page 8: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

8

Ambiguous Terms1

Diagnostic of cancer

Consistent withFavor (s)Most likelyPresumedProbableSuspect (ed)Suspicious (for)Typical (of)

1 www.seer.cancer.gov

Page 9: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

9

Ambiguous Terms1

Cases Diagnosed 1/1/1998 or later

Diagnostic of cancer

AppearsComparable withCompatible withMalignant appearing

1 www.seer.cancer.gov

Page 10: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

10

Ambiguous Terms2

NOT diagnostic of cancer

EquivocalPossibleQuestionableSuggestsWorrisomeCannot be ruled outRule (d) outPotentially malignant

2 www.seer.cancer.gov

Page 11: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

11

Purpose of Text

Defensive abstracting Unusual occurrencesEdit check verificationRecoding auditsResearcher useFacility useRe-abstraction of historical data

Page 12: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

12

Purpose of Text

Defensive abstracting

Unusual occurrences

Edit check verification

Page 13: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

13

Purpose of Text

Recoding audits

Researcher use

Facility use

Re-abstraction of historical data

Page 14: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

14

MCR PERFORMS 100% VISUAL REVIEW OF ALL CASES IN “PREP PLUS”

Page 15: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

15

MCR CHECKING THE ERRORS

Page 16: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

16

LOOKING FOR TEXT FIELDS IN PREP PLUS

Page 17: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

17

MCR TRYING TO MAKE THE CALL

Page 18: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

18

Page 19: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

19

Page 20: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

20

Validating Codes with Text

What is important? Defines who, what, when and where Example:Description of code(s)2/10/07 Date of diagnosisBF 40 y/o black, non-Hispanic

femaleC504 Upper outer quadrant of breast /2 Behavior code for in situ8500 Histology code infil ductal ca

Page 21: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

21

Supporting Text

Date of birth (year)SexRaceHispanic originTumor markersPrimary siteLateralityHistology/behaviorGrade/differentiation

Page 22: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

22

Supporting Text

Tumor sizeCS ExtensionCS LNSRegional LNS positive and examinedCS Mets at DxSite-specific factors 1–6Operative reportsTreatment modalitiesFollow-up and recurrence

Page 23: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

23

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Patient demographic codes:Race code: 02Hispanic code: 0Sex code: 2

Patient demographic text:“B/F, non Hispanic”

Page 24: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

24

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Cancer ID and stage codes

Primary site: C341Histology: 8140Behavior: /3Grade: 2Tumor size: 020Laterality: 1Regional LNs positive: 00Regional LNs examined: 03

Page 25: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

25

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Cancer ID and stage pathology text

8/7/2007: Lobectomy of the right upper lobe lung reveals a moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma measuring 2cm in greatest diameter. Three hilar lymph nodes are removed and are negative for carcinoma. Margins are negative.

Page 26: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

26

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Abbreviated text :

8/7/2007: Lobectomy RUL lung: mod diff inv adenoca. TS 2cm. 3 hilar LN removed, neg for ca. Margins neg.

Page 27: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

27

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Procedure: 30 – LobectomyPrimary site: C341 – RUL lungHistology: 8140 – adenocaBehavior: /3 – malignantGrade: 2 – MDTumor size: 020 – 2cm Laterality: 1 – rtRegional LNS positive: 00 – 00/03Regional LNS examined: 03 – 00/03Margins: 0 – margins neg.

Page 28: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

28

Facility-specific Documentation

Facility-specific information

Medical record number: 548528Date of admission: 8/3/2007Date of discharge: 8/8/2007Hospital number: 625007- Medical CenterClass of case: 1 – Dx and tx here Insurance: 60 – Medicare

Page 29: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

29

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

First course treatment information

Surgery primary site: 22 – LumpectomyScope LNS surgery: 2 – SLN BxChemotherapy: 87 – RefusedRadiation therapy: 7 – RefusedDate hormone tx: 07/10/07Hormone therapy: 01 – Administered

Page 30: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

30

Examples of Validating Codes with Text

Follow-up and recurrence

Type last tumor follow-up: 01 – ReadmitVital status: 1 – AliveRecurrence type: 00 – None/disease-free

Page 31: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

31

NAACCR-Approved Abbreviations3

Adenoca: AdenocarcinomaAnt: AnteriorBil: BilateralCa: CarcinomaCont: ContinueDz: DiseaseDx: DiagnosisExc: Excision

3 www.naaccr.org

Page 32: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

32

NAACCR-Approved Abbreviations

Lg – LargeMets – Metastatic, MetastasesRx – TreatmentSx – SymptomsTx – TreatmentW/ – WithW/O – WithoutW/U – Workup

Page 33: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

33

NAACCR-Approved Symbols

@ At / Comparison< Less than, decrease= Equals> Greater than, increase - Negative+ Positivex Times

Page 34: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

34

Context-Sensitive Abbreviations

Use carefullyAP Anteroposterior; Abdominal perinealBM Bone marrow; Bowel movementCA Carcinoma; CalciumMIN Minimum; MinuteML Middle lobe; MilliliterMM Multiple myeloma; Millimeter PAP Papillary; Papanicolaou smear PT Patient; Physical therapyRT Right; Radiation therapy SCC Small cell carcinoma; Squamous cell

carcinoma

Page 35: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

35

Documentation in the Abstract

Codes Race 01Sex 2Primary site C343Histology/Behavior 8070/3Grade 3Surgery 30Chemotherapy 03Follow-up cancer status 1

Page 36: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

36

Documentation in the Abstract

Text Race: black Sex: female Primary site: upper outer quadrant breastHistology: ductal carcinoma, in situLaterality: left Surgery: lumpectomy Hormone: hormone therapy administeredCancer status: no evidence of this tumor

Page 37: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

37

Documentation in the Abstract

Required fields with textPrimary site: C341 – lung right upper lobe

RUL lungHistology: 8140 – adenocarcinomaBehavior: /3 – malignantGrade: 2 – moderately differentiatedTumor size: 020 – TS 2cm in sizeLaterality: 1 – right RtRegional LNS positive: 00 – noneRegional LNS examined: 03 – three

Page 38: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

38

Documentation in the Abstract

Final abstract

Codes and text provide information on the patient and the patient’s disease

Either should derive the same outcomeText should be concise and pertinent Use only approved abbreviationsCodes provide universal language for

data retrieval

Page 39: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

39

Helpful Hints for Abstracting

Document the information that led to the assignment of a particular codeC619 – Prostate gland

Document in the appropriate area in the abstract

Do not duplicate informationDocument what you know; do not

make assumptions

Page 40: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

40

Visual Editing

Self-editingReread your abstract without the

supporting documentsCentral registry editingVisual editingMajor versus minor errorsMajor error: 8140 instead of 8500Minor error: Colon CS ext 15 instead of 14

Page 41: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

41

Visual Editing

Can improve abstracting skills and improve data quality through

Self-editingCentral registry editingDepartmental editing

Page 42: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

42

Summary

Provide text for all required fields using approved abbreviations to support codes being documented within the abstract.

Perform visual editing of the abstract to validate the correct use of the codes and text provided.

Page 43: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

43

IN CLOSING:

C.Y.A.

Page 44: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

44

C.Y.A. MEANS:

C= COVERY= YOURA= ABSTRACT

DOCUMENT…DOCUMENT…DOCUMENT

Page 45: Module 4: The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry · The Value of Accurate Text in Cancer Registry Using 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules October 21, 2008

45