modis aqua sdsm gerhard meister, presentation to calval, 2006
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MODIS Aqua SDSM
Gerhard Meister,
presentation to CalVal, 2006
![Page 2: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MODIS SDSM
• SDSM (Solar Diffuser Stability Monitor) views SD, sun, and background
• SDSM sun screen installed at wrong angle
9 Detectors, from 412nm to 936 nmh
• 9 detectors from 412nm to 936nm
![Page 3: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
VIIRS SDSM
![Page 4: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Scan Directions
SDSM sun screen: theory
• MODIS screen misalignment confirmed by MCST modeling for yaw maneuvers, but not for regular calibrations
![Page 5: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MODIS SDSM: measured SD/sun ratios for detector 9 (936nm)
Slope: -0.2%
![Page 6: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Effect of reducing number of data points on linear fit to detector 9 data:
![Page 7: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MCST method: divide detectors by detector 9
![Page 8: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Divide detector 7 (857nm) by detector 9
No
![Page 9: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Divide detector 1 (412nm) by detector 9
![Page 10: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Epsilon trend: divide detector 6 (747nm) by detector 7 (857nm)
MCST modeled slope of the ratio: -0.45%My estimate: -0.3 to -0.5%
![Page 11: MODIS Aqua SDSM Gerhard Meister, presentation to CalVal, 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081813/56649f285503460f94c407fd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusions
• No evidence that assumption ‘SD is stable at 936nm’ is wrong, data is too noisy
• Independent of the above assumption, the SD reflectance ratio of 748nm to 870nm is modeled well by MCST (to within 0.1%)
• SD degradation may be slower than model prediction (0.2% at 412nm) (expected from modified calibration schedule, but this explanation not well supported by data)