modeling of biomass combustion in grate fired fuel bed
TRANSCRIPT
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Modeling of biomass combustion in grate fired fuel bed
Hesam Fatehi, Xue-Song BaiDivision of Fluid Mechanics
Dept. of Energy SciencesLund University
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Outline
• Solid Fuel
• Governing Equation
• Numerical Discreetization
• Results
• Future work
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Solid Fuels
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Combustion of Solid Fuels
• Three main types of combustion systems for firing the solid fuels are
– Fixed-bed Combustion
– Suspension
– Fluidized-bed Combustion
• behavior of these three combustion system is related to the behavior of a single fuel particle.
• When a solid fuel particle is exposed to a hot flowing gas stream, it undergoes three stages of mass loss:
– Drying
– Devolatilization or Pyrolysis (generally refers to the anaerobicthermal decomposition of solids )
– Char Combustion
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Combustion of Solid Fuels
• The Time and Sequence of these three processes depends on
– Fuel Type
– Fuel Moisture
– Size
– Heat and Mass Transfer
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Typical boiler
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Governing Equation
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Two phases
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Conservation of mass
�������(������+ (1 − ��)����)
��������+ ��������∙ ��+ ��������∙ �������= 0
����
• Conservation of mass
• Conservation of mass for the solid phase
• Conservation of mass for the gas phase
�������(������)
��������+ ��������∙ �������=
����� ω� g����
����
�������((1 − ��)����)
��������+ (��������∙ ��)����= � ω� s
��������
����
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Conservation of mass
����� = �������������������� �������� ���� ������ ��� ��= ���������������������� �������� ���� ���������� ����= �������� ���������������� ���� ������������ �� ���� = �������������� ���� ������ �������������� ����= �������������� ���� ���������� ���� = ���������������� ���� ������ �������������� ����= ���������������� ���� ���������� ω� s = ω� drying + ω� dev + ω� charcomb
ω� s + ω� g = 0
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Conservation of Energy
• where is the enthalpy of formation at the reference temperature (T=25ºc)
�������(������ℎ��+ ����(1 − ��)ℎ��)
��������+ ������������∙ ��ℎ��+ ��������∙ ��ℎ�������
����
− ������∇����+ (1 − ��)����∇�������������
= � �����dV����
ℎ�� = " ����ℎ��
ℎ��= # ������������
��0+ ℎ��°
ℎ°
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Enthalpy of particle
• particles contain different materials (ash, moisture, char and DAF wood)
• The enthalpy of the particle can be written as sum of the enthalpy of these different materials
ℎ��= ������ℎ ℎ������ℎ + ������������ℎ������������ + ����ℎ����ℎ����ℎ����+ ����������ℎ����������
ℎ�������� = % ��������������������0 + (1 − ����)ℎ��������������° + ����(ℎℎ2��° − ����)
������������ = ������������������ +4190 ����1−����
1+ ����1−����
+ )23.5��0 − 1320 ����1−����
− 6191. ����1−����
������������������ = 3.87����+ 103.1
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Wood CP
������������ = ������ℎ ��������ℎ + �������������������������� + ����������������������
��������ℎ = 800, �������������� = 4200, ������������ = 2400 ��/������
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Wood enthalpy of formation
• assume wood (formed only from Carbon, Hydrogen and Oxygen) on a one step complete combustion
• The products of combustion are only the carbon dioxide and water(in gas form)
������������+ ����2 → ������2 + ����2��
ℎ��������������° = �� ������2����������
ℎ����2° + �� ����2��
����������ℎ��2��° + ��������������
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Kinetic rates
������ ����������������456 ������ ��������+ ���������� ����������
������ ����������������456 ��ℎ����+ ����ℎ + ������������������
��ℎ���� ������ ����������������������������45556 ����2 + ��2��
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Drying
• the mass change between two phases due to drying is equal to the mass rate of H
2O extracted from the solid going to the gas
phase.
• Two different drying models can be used. The first one is based on the Arrhenius expression of chemical reaction model
• The second drying model calculates the evaporation rate of a particle using convective mass transfer between the solid and gas phases. This model expresses drying as a function of moisture content of the wood and the surrounding air and hot gases
• km is the mass transfer coefficient (m/s), Ap is the area of particle cross section (m2), and are the concentration of moisture on gas flow and on particle surface, respectively (kg/m3).
��� ��drying = ������������ �������� , �������� = ����exp(−����ℛ����)
ℳ� ��drying = −��������(����∞ − ������)
����∞ ������
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Devolatilization
• where the subscribe DAF means Dry Ash Free particle and is the fraction of each of tar, char and gas inside DAF particles
��� ��dev = �������� �������� , ��������= ����exp(−����ℛ����)
��� ��dev ������ = ∅������∗ ℳ� ��dev
��� ��dev ������ = ∅������ ∗ ℳ� ��dev
��� ��dev ����ℎ��= ∅��ℎ����∗ ℳ� ��dev (��ℎ���� ���� ������ ��ℎ���� ��������������������)
∅
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Char Combustion Rate
��� ��charcomb = −60 ����?��2@ 11
���� + 1����
, ����= 2.3����������(−11100/����)
���� ���� ��ℎ�� �������� ���������������� ���������������������� (����)
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Numerical Modeling
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Drying, devolatilizationDevolatilization, combustion
combustion
ash
fuelModeled fuel bed shape
Fuel bed and primary air and flue gas supply
several zones supplying hot flue gas + air
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Input Data: Fuel supply
• The fuel - waste
– High ash content: 21.448%
– Low heating value of fuel as DAF: 9.09 MJ/kg
– Moisture content: 30.248%
– Mass rate: 2.933 kg/s
– Energy input = mass rate x LHV = 2.933x9.09x0.483 = 13 MW
• DAF fuel composition (mass fractions)
– C%: 51.76
– H%: 6.87
– O%: 40.52
– N%: 0.842
• DAF fuel reaction mechanism
– DAF Fuel = 0.293 Gas + 0.557 Tar + 0.15 Char
– Gas = 0.22CO2 + 0.51H2O + 0.22CO + 0.05CH4
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Input Data: Air supply
• Air supply to the furnace
– Total mass flow rate: 16.58 kg/s
– Primary air flow rate (50.3% of total air) = 8.34 kg/s
– Primary air temperature: 298.1 K
– Energy input through primary air: 0
• Primary air and flue gas distribution
– 8 zones
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Mp_tar represents the
potential volatile in the solid.
Less Mp_tar indicates that the volatileshave been ’running’ outside of the solid particles
More volatile
at the fresh wood
Less volatiles in the
final particles. Here
the particle is mostly made of ash
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Temperature
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Mass of gas extracting from bed
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Nitrogen
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
CO2
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Drying
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Hydrocarbons
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Carbon Monoxide
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Particle
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Species
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Mass balance
– Input from fuel: 2.933 kg/s
– Input from flue gas: 0. kg/s
– Input from primary air: 8.34 kg/s
– Output through volatile: 10.05 kg/s
– Output through Particle: 0.07 kg/s
– Loss through ash + char: 1.07 kg/s
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Energy balance
– Input from fuel: 24.7 MW
– Input from flue gas: 0 MW
– Output through volatile: 6.6 +11.9 = 18.5 MW
– Loss through ash + char: 6.1 MW
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
CFD Modeling of Upper Part
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Modeling Problem
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
• OpenFOAM
• Solver:
– Flow: buoyantSimpleFoam (Steady-state solver for buoyant, turbulent flow of compressible fluids)
• Prepare boundary condition
– Combustion: ?
• Radiation is an important issue
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Expected Results
Fatehi & Bai Lund 2010-02-11
Future Work
• More detail kinetic rates; drying, devolatilisation, char combustion, volatile combustion, particle shrinkage
• Radiation models (more detail heat transfer models)
• Coupling bed model with upper part combustion CFD model