mock-up tests at cern

58
5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 1 One row of MWPC in one quadrant of Station M#X (size of ‘wall’ 1.5x5.5m) 1 M2M3R2 M3M4M5R3) M3R4 M4R4 (M5R4 s k functionality and stability of different type of chambers at vario ions: ing, shielding, variation of LV, external EMI, effects of parasitic ltage in ground, in LV and HV-lines, etc. experience in assembling MWPC on the Wall and ent possible problems during ‘dressing’, further tests and installat bers in pit lop software for tests of ‘dressed’ chambers on cosmics and mmissioning, etc.

Upload: reegan

Post on 23-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mock-up tests at CERN. One row of MWPC in one quadrant of Station M#X (size of ‘wall’ 1.5x5.5m). M4M5R1 M2M3R2 M3M4M5R3) M3R4 M4R4 (M5R4). Goals To check functionality and stability of different type of chambers at various conditions: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 1

One row of MWPC in one quadrant of Station M#X (size of ‘wall’ 1.5x5.5m)M4M5R1 M2M3R2 M3M4M5R3) M3R4 M4R4 (M5R4)

GoalsTo check functionality and stability of different type of chambers at various conditions: grounding, shielding, variation of LV, external EMI, effects of parasitic currents and voltage in ground, in LV and HV-lines, etc.

To get experience in assembling MWPC on the Wall and To prevent possible problems during ‘dressing’, further tests and installation of chambers in pit

To develop software for tests of ‘dressed’ chambers on cosmics and for commissioning, etc.

Page 2: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 2

with participation of

LHCb muon CERN group, PNPI group,INFN groups

with help and full support of management:

Giovanni, Burkhard, Alexei, Pierluigi

with high interest of

T.Nakada, W.Witzeling, J.Christiansen

Thank to Pavel E., Stas and Pavel K.for help in mock-up assembling

Page 3: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 3

M5R1 has been installed first

Page 4: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 4

Good events: operational chambers

were moved to mock-up testsfrom various groups (CERN, INFN, PNPI)

Page 5: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 5

Two chambers of M3R4(PNPI) operating in parallel during night at HV=2600V detect cosmics

at high count uniformity(count non-uniformity ~1%)

Cosmics collected during night

M3R4#112 M3R4#107

Page 6: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 6

Cosmics: M3R4 #112,#107 horizontal and vertical

0100200300400500600700800900

10001100120013001400150016001700

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000

HV (V)

Co

un

t p

er

pa

d p

er

10

0s

ec

"Ver#112 HV=common" Ver#107 HV=common

Hor#112 HV=common Hor#107 HV=common

Cosmics: M3R4 #112,#107 horizontal and vertical

0100200300400500600700800900

10001100120013001400150016001700

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000

HV (V)C

ou

nt

pe

r p

ad

pe

r 1

00

se

c

Ver#112 (3+4)=2450V (1+2)=scan Ver#107 (3+4)=2450V (1+2)=scan

Hor#112 (1+2)=2450V (3+)=scan Hor#107 (1+2)=2450V (3+4)=scan

are measured on cosmicsin self-triggering mode using 2AND-logic built-in inside FEE chip

Cross-talks obtained from the slope of HV plateau:5-10% in range of HV=2650-2750V

It increases above 2800V, as expected

HV plateau and X-talks

Slope and cross-talks are lessbecause one bigapat lower HV=2450V

slop

e

HV plateau 400V

1. Measured at equal HV 1. One bigap at HV=2450V, another - scan

2 fundamental characteristics:

Note: X-talks are doubled at equal HV

Page 7: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 7

Cosmic muons (horizont): Bigap(1+2) at 2450V, Bigap(3+4)=scan

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000

HV (V)

Co

un

t (H

z/m

2)

M3R4 (TH=15fC) M5R1 (TH=6fC)

300V

Correct cosmic rays fluxes at given acceptance, as expectedOperational HV-plateau 300V, as expectedCross-talk in CPC (M5R1) is higher (see slope) w.r.t. WPC (M3R4), as expected

in Hz/m2

is reference to detect problems in both hardware and software (during debagging)

HV operational 300V

Cosmic rays flux

Page 8: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 8

5.5m

Page 9: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 9

All 20 various types of MWPC (CPC-SCRO, CPC-DCRO and WPC)

fully and finally equippedare planed to be tested on mock-up

Page 10: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 10

MWPCwith CARDIAC

VME crate 6U

PCUSB2Canbusinterface

ControlData

Service Board (Roma1) -1Gate Board (Roma1) -1

ACQ modules as 64-input scalers(Roma2, LNF) – # depends on MWPC and readout logic, e.g. 1 module for 8 WPC(M3R4) 1.5 for 1 M3R2

CAEN USB-VME bridge -1

Hardware:

Software: (written by Rafael, still not finished)

schematics

Scalers

Kvaser PCIcan 4HS board

Page 11: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 11

Bad events and effectsobserved during preparation and

tests on mock-up

Page 12: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 12

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=011

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=00

A=02

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=03

M3R2#26 (Cathodes)Noise spectra

43 minutes per 192 channelsat 100ms gate (case M4M5R1) ~ 1 hour per 224 ch. (M3R2)

Very high parallelismis needed in pitto scan spectra

and load parametersto FEE

in a reasonable time

Do we

have

so m

any o

pera

tors

with e

xper

ience

?

From

whe

re th

ey co

me?

Multiply to number of chambers…~ 2 months of work

Page 13: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 13

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=04

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=05

A=06

A=07

A=08

A=09

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

M3R2#26 (Wires)

Page 14: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 14

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=10

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=11

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=12

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

A=13

M3R2#26 (Cathodes)

%22CARDIACBad

Page 15: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 15

CARDIAC quality still low

Page 16: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 16

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Cut data

Add noise

Does not see FEE-addressesBad contact modifies 1sec time gate

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Pedestal appears

1

2

4 5

Such bouquet

was not expected

3

Page 17: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 17

Serious problem with connector for I2C used in Service Board?

All SB produced

Many cables already installed in pit

Page 18: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 18

There is another problem Service Board

sometime losses control (and SB even does not see FEE-ddresses);

VME crate OFF/ON helps

?

Page 19: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 19

Scope shows presence of parasitic voltage in ground

~2V

p-p

~2V

p-p

The source:

Page 20: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 20

Voltage on CAEN ground w.r.t. Common ground (rack)

2V p

eak-

peak

Page 21: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 21

FFT gives a few peaks in range of 8-16MHz (well within FEE bandwidth) repeating rate ~38kHz

~2V

p-p

f=8-16MHz

A radio-frequency cavity in the PS.

Page 22: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 22

ACQ?

M5R1 HV=2450V

Cosmics counts collected during night in self-triggering mode (2AND logic)

Bad contacts inOPB – the worst case!!!

Statistics or missing counts?

Statistics?

Page 23: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 23

50MHz50MHz

Mis

sing c

ounts

due to

ACQ

are

possib

le

Note:ACQ can be used either as multi-scaler or register.In tests below it is64-channel scaler;

In tests below ACQ satisfactory operates at ~ 100MHz

Page 24: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 24

Good pulse width for ACQ 10ns

Bad pulse width for ACQ 5ns

Mis

sing c

ounts

due to

ACQ

are

possib

le

Page 25: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 25

First cosmics on mock-upM5R1 HV=2650V

?

Page 26: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 26

Replaced I2C-cable

M5R1, HV=2750VTH=7fC

First panoramic view on mock-upM5R1 HV=2650V

14 August 200630 minutes

during lunch timeThen during the day

was impossible to reproduce

ReasonsReasons…many

Page 27: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 27

Tests were performed in presence of parasitic voltage in ground

~ 2V peak-to-peak of wide frequency spectrum

Page 28: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 28

Criterion (noise count at operational threshold): cycle of 1sec – count uniformity and rate (Hz)

M5R1#08 TH=6fC HV=2750V/2450V TH=7fC

TH=8fC TH=9fC

Page 29: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 29

M5R1#08 TH=6fC HV=2750V/2450V

Criterion: statistics during long time– count uniformity

TH=10fC does not help

Page 30: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 30

Criterion (noise count at operational threshold): cycle of 1sec – count uniformity and rate (Hz)

Before increasing thresholds

Before increasing thresholds

one must try better ground FC to wall

one must try better ground FC to wall

- as low impedance, as better

- as low impedance, as better

M5R1#08 TH=6fC HV=2750V/2450V

Page 31: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 31

M5R1:TH=6fC at HV2750/2450

Mean ~1-2Hz

Cycle of 1sec – count uniformity and rate (Hz)

Page 32: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 32

TH=6fC at HV2750/2450

padHz /06.0~ padHz /06.0~

M5R1#08Count non-uniformity <10%

(statistics)

Try to collect statistics during night … here ~ 2 hours

Page 33: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 33

Count non-uniformity 5.6%Statistics ~3%, what other ~3%

M5R1 2750/2450VPulse width 25ns

Statistics during ~12 hours of real time

%31000

1000

Other 3% - X-talks non-uniformity (profile, modulation)Grouping of bins reduce visible %, see case of M4R4 (2AND/4OR logic) in slide 23

Page 34: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 34

Statistics during ~12 hours of real time (another day)

Count non-uniformity 5.6%M5R1 2750/2450VPulse width 20ns

Page 35: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 35

Count non-uniformity 9%

M5R1 2750/2450VPulse width 17ns

Statistics during ~6 hours

Page 36: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 36

Statistics during ~1 hour

Count non-uniformity 22%

M5R1 2750/2450VPulse width 10nsMissing counts dominate here, ACQ can not count

Page 37: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 37

Experiment Cosmic tests2OR (bigap-to-bigap) 2AND (bigap-to-bigap)

2OR/2OR 2AND/2OR

2OR/4OR 2AND/4OR

? 2AND-wires

2AND/2OR-cathodes

? Special during tests to reduce # cables

e.g. 2AND/4OR everywhere

in DIALOG

No software

yet

Page 38: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 38

M4M5R1

Page 39: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 39

M5R1#08 (vertical, mock-up) HV scan on cosmics in self-triggering mode (2AND logic)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900

HV (V)

Co

un

t p

er p

ad p

er 3

60 s

ec

(3+4)=2450V, (1+2)=scan

Rather slow work: 6 minutes of real time per point in lab. ~1 hour/point in pit

Higher gain in left side

~300V plateau (operational)~5% cross-talks at 2650V

~300V plateau (operational)~5% cross-talks at 2650V

),(30~2

Am

Hz ),(30~2

Am

Hz

HV-plateau and slope - correctCosmic rays flux - correct

Page 40: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 40

M3M4R4

Thank to Boris and Yuryfor help and participation

in measurements

Page 41: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 41

M3R4#112 and #107(read as M4R4 here)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900

HV (V)

Co

un

t p

er p

ad p

er 1

00se

c

#112 (1+2)=2450V, (3+4)=scan #107(1+2)=450V, (3+4)=scan

),(60~2

Am

Hz ),(60~2

Am

Hz

),(60~2

Am

Hz ),(60~2

Am

Hz

2AND-readout

2AND/4OR-readout

HV-plateau and slopes - correctCosmic rays flux - correct

Page 42: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 42

M3M4M5R3

Where resistor in HV-return?

Thank to Rafael for participation

in measurements

Page 43: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 43

Operation: CARDIAC replaced (DIALOG bad, CARIOCA good)

Page 44: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 44

M3R3#29

0

20

40

60

80

100

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900HV (V)

Co

un

ts

per

pad

in

2'

Bigap(1+2)=2450V, (3+4)=scan

X-talk=10%

Higher gain in left side

~300V plateau (operational)~300V plateau (operational)

),(60~2

Am

Hz ),(60~2

Am

Hz

Slope more than in WPC,as expected, higher cross-talksdue to higher capacitive couplingand due to not enough Cblock

There is HV-plateau X-talks- too much

Cosmic rays flux - correct

TH=6fC

Page 45: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 45

HV=2550/2650V, TH=7fC@13mV/fCLogic 2AND

Count non-uniformity ~3%modulated by X-talks

Page 46: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 46

Cosmics counts collected during night

Count non-uniformity ~5%modulated by X-talks

HV=2450/2750V, TH=7fC@13mV/fCLogic 2AND/2OR

Page 47: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 47

M5R4 (M5R2 missing)

Where resistor in HV-return?

Thank to Giacomo for his interest and participation

in measurements

Page 48: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 48

M5R4 - Firenze

M3R3 - Frascati

Page 49: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 49

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

M5R4#127 – FEE noise spectra

A=00

A=01

A=02

Replaced CARDIAC

(DIALOG chip was problematic)

Acceptable

Very good

Page 50: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 50

M5R4#127

0100200300400500600700800900

100011001200130014001500

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900HV (V)

Co

un

ts p

er p

ad p

er 1

00se

c

Bigap(3+4)=2450V, (1+2)=scan

X-talk=20%

No plateauHigh cross-talks

Signature of bad CARDIAC

Measured before replacement

Page 51: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 51

M5R4#127

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900HV (V)

Co

un

ts p

er p

ad p

er 1

00se

c

Replaced CARDIAC PNPI

X-talk=5%

),(70~2

Am

Hz ),(70~2

Am

Hz

There is plateau; cosmics flux -correct; cross-talks more than expected

(much higher than in PNPI M3R4)

300V operational300V operational

M3R4 (PNPI) for comparison

Page 52: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 52

Scope shows often multiple pulses, which give high count rise at 2800V

M5R4#127

Note: particles cross often the chamber alongwires producing large signals (x10) which will be rare in the LHCb experiment)

Page 53: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 53

M5R4#127Cosmics count during night in self-triggering mode (2AND/4OR logic)

HV=2450/2750V, TH=15fC@9mV/fCCount non-uniformity ~ 7%

Higher X-talks due to gas gain non-uniformity in bigap (1+2)enough to have a few points with micro discharge

Page 54: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 54

ifmeasurements on cosmicsgive correct curve ‘Count vs. HV’

then … chamber acceptedelse … fix problem and repeat end if…

Page 55: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 55

3 3 WorkStationsWorkStations, as developed on mock-up tests, have to be assembled at CERN

for each group:

PNPI to test 600 chambers automatically (8 WPC-chambers in parallel)In average ~8 WPC-chambers per day + night (day preparation, night measurements);

INFN to test 600 chambers automatically (8 WPC-chambers in parallel or 4 CPC-chambers in parallel), In average ~6 chambers per day + night (day preparation, night measurements);

CERN to test 200 chambers automatically (4 CWPC-chambers in parallel)In average ~4 chambers per day + night (day preparation, night measurements);

Note: SSimilarimilar WorkStationWorkStation for GEMfor GEMIn addition: Cables and connectors in pit have to be commissioned before chamber installation

Similar WorkStations

will be needed soon in pit

to smoothly move in the experiment

Mandatory

how to make final tests before installation

Start: OctoberFinish: February

Page 56: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 56

Problematic gap: M1R4#5/Gap1 (LNF)before and after 16 hours on GIFat reversed HV=-2340V

Compare to chamber arriving from LNF (red)

1

10

100

1000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

-HV (V)

Cu

rren

t at

GIF

wit

h a

tt=

5 (n

A)

MWPC conditioning (comparison)

Page 57: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 57

M3R4 at reversed HVI vs. V measured on GIF

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500-HV (V)

I (n

A)

Beginning end end2

MWPC conditioning (comparison)

Page 58: Mock-up tests at CERN

5 September 2006 A.P.Kashchuk 58

M2R1#07 after 135h of wire conditioning in lab.

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

-HV (V)

I (n

A)

on

GIF

at

att=

5

MWPC conditioning (comparison)

Only few % pass additional conditioning in GIF at reversed HV