MMR Doc. No

15624

FINALREMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

AREA OF’ CONTAMINATION FS-9

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATIONCAPE COD, MASSACHUSETTS

Prepared for:

AFCEE/MMRInstallation Restoration Program

322 East Inner RoadOtis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Contract No. F41624-97-D-8009Delivery Order 0019

September 2002

Environmental Chemical Corporation5 Kittridge Road

Otis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Final Kenii:dial Action Hepon Ai\d of Contamination IS-1)

September 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1-0 INTRODUCTION 1.1

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION 1-2

1.2 REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT HISTORY 1-3

1.3 PREVIOUS SITE ASSESSMENTS AND RESTORATION ACTIVITIES 1-3

1.3.1 Site Investigation Activities 1-31.3.3 Siinip Removal Action Program 1-41.3.3 Soiirce Control Actions 1-41.3.4 Reniedinl Investigation arid Feasibility Study .4ctivities 1-4

2.0 OPERABLE UNIT BACKGROUND 2-1

2.1 RECORD OF DECISION 2-1

2.2 PRE-DESIGN SAMPLING PROGRAM 2-2

2.3 EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES 2-2

3.0 REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 3-1

3.1 DETAIL A ACTIVITIES 3-1

3.2 DETAIL B REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES 3-1

3.2.1 Pre-Remediation Site Status 3-13.2.2 Site Preparation 3-23.2.3 Excavarion 3-23.2.4 Confirmation Sampling 3-23.2.5 Restoration 3-33.2.6 Post-remediation Site Status 3-3

3.3 DET.4IL c &.C1EDLAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES 3-3

3.3.1 Pre-remedial activity site status 3-33.3.2 Site Prepill-ation 3-43.3.3 Excavation 3-43.3.4 Confirniation Sampling 3-43.3.5 Restoration 3-53.3.6 Post Remedial Activity Site Status 3-5

3.4 STOCKPILE HF.L\NAGEMENT AND DISPOSITION 3-5

4.0 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 4-1

5.0 QUALITY CONTROL AND HEALTH .4ND SAFETY 5-1

5.1 QUALITY PROGRAM PLAN 5-1

5.2 HEALTH AND SAFETY 5-1

6.0 FINAL INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATIONS 6-1

7.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 7-1

8.0 SUMIVIARY OF PROJECT COSTS 8-18.1 ESTIMATED COST TO COMPLETE . EXCAVATION AND OFF-SITE DISPOSAL 8-1

Find Reniedid Action Report Area o/ Coiitnniinntiori FS-9

September 2002

8.2 ACTUAL COST TO COMPLETE - EXCAVATION AND OFF-SITE DISPOSAL 8-1

8.3 COST COMPARISON 8-2

9.0 OBSERVATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED 9-1

10.0 OPERABLE UNIT CONTACT INFORMATION 10-1

11.0 REFERENCES 11-1

LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 COCs and Respective Cleanup Levels for the FS-9 Site Table 2-1 Contaminants of Concern and

Respective Remedial Action Levels for FS-9 Table 2-2 MCP Method S-1/GW-1 Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 3-1 FS-9 Detail B Confirmation Sample Results Table 3-2 FS-9 Detail C Confirmation Sample Results Table 8-1 Estimated Final Costs

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 MMR Site Map Figure 1-2 FS-9 Site Overview Map Figure 3-1 FS-9 Detail B Delineation Sample Locations Figure 3-2 FS-9 Detail B Excavation Boundary and Confirmatory Sample Locations Figure 3-3 FS-9 Detail C Delineation Sample Locations Figure 3-4 FS-9 Detail C Excavation Boundary and Confirmatory Sample Locations

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Photographs Appendix B Data Summary Report Appendix C Backfill Documentation Appendix D Soil Stockpile Sample Data and MA Landfill Reuse Levels Appendix E Bill of Lading Appendix F Landfill Acceptance Letter Appendix G Nonconformance Reports

Firm1 Reruedid Action Report Areo of Contnitrinntiori FS-9

Septenrber 2002

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AEHA U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency AF'CEE Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence AOC area of contamination

bgs below ground surface

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Restoration Compensation Liability Act

COC contaminants of concern CQP Contractor Quality Plan CSA central storage area cy cubic yards

DSR Data Summary Report DSRP Drainage Structure Removal Program

ECC Environmental Chemical Corporation EPA U S . Environmental Protection Agency EPH extractable petroleum hydrocarbons ESD Explanation of Significant Differences

FD Field Duplicate FFA Federal Facilities Agreement FS Feasibility Study FS-9 Fuel Spill 9 ft2 Square Foot

GPS global positioning system

IRP Installation Restoration Program

m3 cubic meters

MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan m g k 3 milligrams per kilograms MMR Massachusetts Military Reservation MS/MSD matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate

NCR nonconformance report NGB National Guard Bureau NHESP National Heritage and Endangered Species Program NPL National Priorities List

in

Final Remedial Aclion Report Area of Cotitmiiinatioti FS-9

Septeniber 2002

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

OSHA Occupational Safety and Hazard Administration

PCB polychlorinated biphenyls PPm parts per million PSRF Permitted Soil Recycling Facility

QA quality assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC quality control QCM Quality Control Manager QPP Quality Program Plan

RAC Remedial Action Contract RAL Remedial Action Levels RAO Remedial Action Objectives RAW Remedial Action Wok Plan RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RI remedial investigation ROD Record of Decision

SARAP Source Area Remedial Action Program SHSP Site Health and Safety Plan SI Site Investigation SRAP Sump Removal Action Program STCL soil target cleanup level STP Sewage Treatment Plant SVE Soil Vapor Extraction s v o c semi-volatile organic compounds

TCE trichloroethane TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons TSCA Toxic Substance Control Act TSDF Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility

USCG U.S. Coast Guard UST underground storage tanks

v o c volatile organic compounds VPH volatile petroleum hydrocarbons

iv

Find Reiiirdid Action Report Area of Contflniinmion FS-9

Sepreniber 2002

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the soil remedial action conducted at the Fuel Spill 9 (FS-9) site, which is an Area of Contamination (AOC) included in the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP) located at the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The remedial action was completed by Environmental Chemical Corporation (ECC) for the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) between April and May, 2001.

A Record of Decision (ROD) for FS-9 was finalized in June 1999, and identified three details which required remedial actions; Detail A, the former underground storage tank (UST) location, Detail B, the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) hot spot, and Detail C, the fence line hot spot. The selected remedy in the ROD was excavation and on-site asphalt batching, with a contingency for Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) and groundwater monitoring.

Prior to remedial action, a pre-design soil sampling and analysis program was conducted in 2000 at Detail A. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the extent of the contaminants of concern (COCs) identified in the ROD (TPH, chromium, vanadium and zinc). Results of the investigation indicated that all COCs present at Detail A were at concentrations below cleanup levels identified in the ROD, and therefore No Further Action was recommended at Detail A (TNA, 2000a). The SVE and the groundwater-monitoring component of the selected remedy were not exercised because of post-ROD sampling conducted as part of pre-design activities (TNA, 2000a).

Prior to remedial action, delineation soil sampling and analysis was conducted in 2001 at FS-9 Detail B, the TPH hot spot, to determine the extent of the COCs identified in the ROD (TPH). Delineation sampling results indicated that approximately 50 cubic yards (cy) of soil were present at concentrations above the Remedial Action Levels (RALs). The RALs are different from those presented in the ROD and have been documented in an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) (Portage, 2002) as further discussed in Section 2.3 of this document. A total of 56 cy of impacted soil was removed from the detail and transported to the MMR Central Storage Area (CSA) for characterization. Confirmatory soil samples were collected and analyzed from the detail. Analytical results of these confirmatory samples indicated all Detail B COCs were below their respective RALs. The detail was restored with erosion control material, and riprap.

Also, prior to remedial action, delineation soil sampling and analysis was conducted at FS-9 Detail C, the fence line soil hot spot, to determine the extent of the COCs identified in the ROD (lead and zinc) and TPH. The results were compared to the revised RALs and it was determined that zinc concentrations were below the RAL. Only lead and TPH were present at concentrations exceeding the RALs. Delineation sampling results indicated that approximately 70 cy of soil was present which contained lead and TPH above the site KALs. A total of 66 cy of soil was removed from the detail and transported to the MMR CSA for characterization. Confirmatory soil samples were collected from the excavation and analyzed for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) and lead. Analytical results of

1-1

Finn1 Reriredinl dcrion Report Awn of Contnirriimtion FS-9

Septeiiiber -700-7

these confirmatory samples indicated that concentrations of lead and EPHNPH were below their respective RAL for petroleum hydrocarbons. The FS-9 Detail C area was backfilled with clean backfill material and restored with hydroseeding.

The selected remedy for FS-9 was excavation and on-site asphalt batching. However, off-site disposal replaced on-site asphalt batching (refer to ESD discussion in Section 2.3) as a component of the selected remedy (Portage, 2002). The FS-9 soils removed from the Detail B and C excavations were combined with soils from other hlMR AOC remedial sites, with similar disposal requirements. Composite sampling of the consolidated soil stockpiles determined that the consolidated soils were considered non-hazardous and suitable for reuse as daily cover at the Taunton Subtitle D Landfill. FS-9 soils were disposed of at the Taunton Landfill, in compliance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Reuse and Disposal of Contaminated Soil ut Massachusetts Landfills Policy #COMM-97-001. The MADEP has approved the use of this disposal facility for reuse and disposal of MMR-generated soils.

1.1 Site Description

MMR is located on western Cape Cod in Bamstable County, Massachusetts, approximately 60 miles south of Boston, and immediately southeast of the Cape Cod Canal. It occupies approximately 22,000 acres and is within the towns of Bourne, Falmouth, Mashpee and Sandwich (Figure 1-1)

The MMR Cantonment Area occupies 5,000 acres in the southern portion of MMR. This area contains the administrative, operational, maintenance, housing, and support facilities for the base and currently is the operational portion of MMR. FS-9 occupies approximately 7 acres of the south-central portion of MMR in the Cantonment Area near Building 1369. FS-9 extends south a distance of approximately 720 feet from Building 1369, located southwest of the intersection of Beaman Road and West Truck Road, to Building 1366. An asphalt paved portion of the site extends north-south along the FS-9 site, west of Building 1369 approximately 120 feet, where it is bounded by undeveloped land across a chain-link fence that extends from Beaman Road to approximately the boundary between Buildings 1367 and 1368. The undeveloped portion of the site extends an additional 370 feet west of this pavement and includes a small vernal pool and drainage ditch, which originates at the western edge of the pavement (Figure 1-2).

The developed portion of FS-9 was a motor pool that remained in service from WWII until 1986. At the time of the Remedial Investigation (RI), the site included five buildings (Buildings 1365 through 1369); three 5,000 gallon capacity steel USTs; a fuel island used for dispensing gasoline and diesel fuel; a catch basin; and two waste disposal leaching wells. Presently, the site includes the five buildings and a leaching well located adjacent to Building 1369, Mhich was abandoned in place by first cleaning it and then filling it with cement grout. The USTs and associated dispensing pumps, catch basin, and the leaching well locatzd adjacent to Building 1368 were removed during the Fuel Systems Upgrade Program.

FS-9 is currently being used as a parking area for military vehicles. The former UST area is identified as FS-9, Detail A. FS-9, Detail B is located west of the paved area and is in an

1-2

Find Retiredid Acrion Report Awn o/ Contnniinniion FS-9

Seprenrber 2002

undeveloped portion of FS-9. Detail B contains a drainage ditch or swale, which currently receives runoff from the paved area but it is not affected by operations associated with military vehicle parking (Figure 1-2). Detail C is outside the fenced perimeter of the active area and is not affected by the military vehicle parking activities (Figure 1-2).

1.2 Regulatory and Enforcement History

On November 21, 1989, the EPA placed MMR on the National Priorities List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Restoration Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA), for an evaluation and implementation of response actions for cleaning up past releases of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants. A Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) between the National Guard Bureau (NGB), the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was signed in 1991 and amended in 1996 and 1997. AFCEE currently provides on-site management and direction for the execution of cleanup activities at MMR in accordance with the FFA.

Extensive records search and review of available soil and groundwater data identified 73 areas at MMR as having the potential for contamination of Areas of Concem. FS-9 was identified as one of these areas during this effort as a site having a potential for contamination.

The Proposed Plan for Remedial Action of the source areas at FS-9 was issued in October 1998 for public comment. The Public hearing was conducted on November 4, 1998. The ROD for FS-9 was finalized in June 1999.

1.3 Previous Site Assessments and Restoration Activities

Numerous site investigations were conducted at the FS-9 Site to determine if activities associated with the former motor pool affected surface water, sediments, and subsurface soils. Additionally, a groundwater confirmation study of the FS-9 Site was completed by the Army Environmental Hygiene Agency (AEHA) in 1985 to assess the presence or absence of groundwater contamination resulting from spills or leaks associated with the USTs at the former Motor Pool.

1.3.1 Site Iniestisation Actiifities

Prei-ious site inLestigatioii actitities completcd at the FS-9 Site inclucled a soil gas suney, cycaation test pits, soil boring. and gi-oundu~ter monitoring n~ll installation. Suniniaries of these investigation actibities are listed below.

Soil gas samples were collected and field analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCS).

Thirteen test pits were excavated to depths of between six and eight feet below ground surface (bgs) and 15 soil samples were collected and analyzed from these test pits under Contract Laboratory Program protocols for VOCs, semi-volatile organic compounds

1-3

Find Renrcdinl .Icrion Report Are0 of Corrmt~rinnriotr FS-9

Sepfettiber 2002

(SVOCs), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and metals.

• Five soil samples were collected from two soil boring and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, PCBs, and metals.

• Three ground water monitoring wells were installed. Well locations were downgradient of the USTs, downgradient of the western edge of FS-9, and at the pavement edge. Seven groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells during two sampling events and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals.

As part of the 1985 AEHA investigation, one groundwater monitoring well was installed 120 feet downgradient of the former USTs. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs. The results of the investigation indicated that no groundwater contamination exists at the FS-9 Site in association with the former USTs (AEHA, 1986).

1.3.2 Sump Removal Action Program

The Sump Removal Action Program (SRAP) investigative activities at the FS-9 Site included advancement of two TerraprobesThf along and beneath the leaching well formerly located adjacent to Building 1369, and abandoned in place. Recovered samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, pesticidesiPCBs, and inorganics (ABB, 1992).

1.3.3 Source Control Actions

The five former USTs present at the FS-9 Site, along with the fuel dispensing island, were removed as part of the Fuel Upgrade Program in 1993 (HAZWRAP, 1998b). The UST Removal Report indicates that all contaminated soils were removed from the tank pits. The UST Removal Report indicates that soils were returned to the UST excavation, but does not indicate if the soils used to backfill the pit were contaminated or clean (HAZWRAP, 1999a).

1.3.4 Rerncdial Invcstigation and Fcasibility Study Activities

A RI of the FS-9 Site \\.as initiated in 1993 and completed in 1908. Diiiins the RI, the FS-9 Site \vas dividcd into fi\.s areas: (1) thc motor pool fiicling island and USTs. (2) thc t\vo leaching wells and catch basis; (3) the waste disposal area, (4) the drainage ditch or swale area, and (5) the vemal pool area. Summaries of the findings of the RI are listed below by area of investigation.

. Motor Pool USTs and Fueling Island: Surface soil sampling results from 1994 indicated concentrations of several COCs above their respective soil target cleanup levels (STCLs) including lead (793 milligram per kilogram [mg/kg]), chromium (77.3 mg/kg), vanadium (17.3 mg/kg) and zinc (239 mg/kg).

• Leaching Wells and Catch Basin: The two waste disposal leaching wells and their associated catch basins were removed as part of the Drainage Structure Removal Program (DSRP) in 1996 (HAZWRAP, 1999b). Specifically, the catch basin and the leaching

1-4

Find Rcrricdinl Action Report Awn of Corrtniriinntion FS-9

Scpterirbcr 2002

well adjacent to Building 1365 were removed along with 14 cy of soil. However, due to the location of the leaching well immediately adjacent to Building 1369 and concerns about the structural integrity of Building 1369 if the well were to be removed, the leaching well was abandoned in-place. This was completed by first removing all wastes, and then decontaminating the well using power-washing and steam-cleaning equipment.

Drainage Ditch and Swale Area: Surface soils in the drainage and swale area contained trace to low concentrations of organic and inorganic compounds. Subsurface soil samples, collected in 1990, contained concentrations of aliphatic hydrocarbons above the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method S-l/GW-1 standards

Vemal Pool: Sediment samples collected in 1994 from the vemal pool located in the FS-9 Site contained trace concentrations of VOCs and low concentrations of SVOCs, pesticides, and PCBs. A sediment study was conducted to evaluate the potential effect of the sediments on organisms. Conclusions of the sediment study indicated that there was no acute or chronic lethality to organisms exposed to site sediments. Additionally, the study concluded that there was no chronic or acute adverse impact on survivability or reproduction of sensitive aquatic receptors.

A Feasibility Study (FS) was completed in October 1998 for the FS-9 Site. Results of the ecological and human health risk assessments triggered the need for an alternative evaluation. Remedial Action Objectiyes (RAOs) were developed as part of the FS to serve as a framework for the identification of remedial action alternatives. RAOs are designed to protect human health and the environment by identifying COCs, receptor groups of greatest concern, exposure routes associated with the highest risk estimates and a target risk level of the individual contaminants based on site-specific exposure scenarios.

The RAOs for the FS-9 Site from the FS include protection of human health; ecology; and the Sagamore Lens, the sole source drinking water aquifer at Cape Cod. RAOs for the FS-9 Site are presented below:

. Human Health: Tivo RAOs were established ­

Reduce soil levels of systemic toxicants to equal background or a target hazard index of one for individual constituents, with the cumulative target hazard index not to exceed 10 for the most exposed human receptor groups. Reduce soil levels of potential carcinogens to equal background or a target hazard

‘~index of 1 ~10 for individual constituents, with a cumulative risk of no greater than 1 xlO-' for the total excess carcinogenic risk for the most exposed human receptor groups.

• Ecological receptors: RAOs include protection of animals and plants that are indigenous to the MMR. Reduce levels of COCs of soil levels within first two feet bgs to the greater of the following: (1) background, (2) most conservative calculated STCL of representative mammalian and avian receptors; terrestrial plant toxicological benchmark

1-5

Find Remedial Action Reporr Arm of Contniiiinntion FS-9

September 2002

values; and invertebrates.

• Protection of Sole Source Aquifer: Reduce subsurface soil levels that would be protective of groundwater quality based on residential use.

From the FS, COCs and respective cleanup levels were established for the FS-9 Site. These are listed in the table below.

Table 1-1

COCs and Respective Cleanup Levels for the FS-9 Site

Contaminant of Concern Cleanup Level (mg/kg) Basis for Cleanup Level Chromium 6.8 Ecological

Lead 300 Human Vanadium 15.2 Ecological

Zinc 16 Ecological C; and CR aliuhatics 100 MCP Method 1 S-I/GW-1

The MMR Remedial Technology Evaluation and Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements Handbook (HAZWRAP, 1989a), and the EPNAFCEE Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide (EPA, 1994a), and other sources were used to identify and screen technologies and process options that could achieve the established RAOs. Alternatives that received detailed analysis in the FS-9 Site FS are listed below:

• No Action • Limited Action

ExcavatiodAsphalt Batching • ExcavatiodAsphalt Batching with Contingency Low Flow Vapor Extraction

1-6

Find Reiiiedinl Action Report Arcn o/ Contoininntion FS-9

Septeinber 2002

2.0 OPERABLE UNIT BACKGROUND

The following sections describe the FS-9 Site Record of Decision, pre-design sampling, and the subsequent changes to this ROD in the ESD.

2.1 Record of Decision

A Proposed Plan was issued by AFCEE in 1998 for public comment. The proposed remedy (Alternative 6 in the FS) consisted of excavation and removal of contaminated surface soils at three FS-9 Site contaminant source areas: Detail A, the former tank (UST) locations (CPT107/CPT108); Detail B the TPH hot spot (TP-11); and Detail C the fence line hot spot (SS1). The proposed remedy included on-site cold-mix asphalt batching of recyclable excavated soils, and off-site disposal of non-recyclable excavated soils. The proposed remedy also included post excavation confirmatory sampling to ensure that all soils with COC concentrations exceeding FS-9 soil cleanup levels were removed, implementation and maintenance of access restrictions, and 5-year reviews of remedy protectiveness at the three source areas. Furthermore, a contingency remedy to implement a SVE treatment system if confirmation sampling indicates that subsurface soil contamination is beyond the practical limits of excavation at the former UST excavation area(s).

Tasks associated with major components of the selected remedy are listed below.

Excavation of surface or near-surface soils with contaminant concentrations exceeding FS-9 soil cleanup levels at the three source areas, including:

Detail A - The former UST locations (CPT107/CPT108) (estimated volume of 783 cy). COCs include TPH, and the metals lead, chromium, vanadium, and zinc.

Detail B - The TPH hot spot (TP-11) (estimated volume of 196 cy). COCs include Cj-Cg aliphatics under MADEP MCP Method 1 S-l/GW-l.

Detail C - The Fence Line hot spot (SSl) (estimated volume 15 cy). COCs include the metals lead and zinc.

• Segregation of excavated soils for asphalt batching of recyclable soils, or off-site disposal of non-recyclable soils.

• Off-site transportation and disposal of excavated soils that are determined to be below each of the following criteria. (1) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) allowable concentrations: (2) to contain contaminant concentrations below MADEP MCP Method 1 S-l/GW-1 standards for pesticides; and (3) below Massachusetts Permitted Soil Recycling Facility Summary Levels to an on-site asphalt batching facility for treatment.

• Off-site transportation and disposal of excavated soils that are determined to be above

2-1

Fitrnl Rcnicdiol Action Report Awn of Coirtoiirinotion FS-9

Scpteiiiber 2002

one of the following criteria. (1) RCRA TCLP allowable concentrations; (2) to contain contaminant concentrations above MADEP MCP Method 1 S-1/GW-1 standards for pesticides; or (3) above Massachusetts Permitted Soil Recycling Facility Summary Levels to a RCRA Subtitle C treatment storage and disposal facility (TSDF) for off-site disposal.

• Backfilling of excavated areas with clean backfill material.

• Quarterly groundwater monitoring for two years and annually thereafter for three years.

Five-year periodic reviews of well monitoring and other pertinent data to assess whether the selected remedy remains protective of human health and the environment, and whether additional remedial action is appropriate.

Design, construction, and operation of an in-situ SVE treatment system if confirmation sampling indicates that subsurface soil contamination is beyond the practical limits of excavation at the tank pit area.

The ROD was finalized in June 1999 and documented the selected remedy. The selected remedy was not changed as a result of comments received during the Proposed Plan public comment period.

2.2 Pre-Design Sampling Program

Soil sampling was conducted at FS-9 Detail A to collect additional information to assist in the remedial design. Soil samples were collected from both the fill material and the soil from below the former excavations to confirm clean closure of the US’Ts. In October 1999, soil samples were collected from four locations at various depths. A total of eight samples were sent to a fixed based laboratory for the EPH and VPH, and the metals chromium, lead, vanadium, and zinc analysis. The analytical results indicated none of the targeted metals, or VPH/EPH constituents were present above the reporting limits or STCLs. Therefore, No Further Action was recommended for Detail A (TNA, 2000a).

2.3 Explanation of Significant Differences

An ESD was prepared to document changes to the selected remedy for several sites in the Source Area Remedial Action Program (SARAP) including sites covered under the FS-9 ROD (Portage, 2002). Three changes were made to the selected remedy presented in FS-9 ROD:

. Establishment of RALs for certain inorganic chemicals and petroleum hydrocarbons; • Removal of the asphalt-batching component from the selected remedy; and . Expansion of off-site disposal options to RCRA Subtitle D facilities.

The ESD documents establishment of RALs for certain inorganic chemicals and petroleum hydrocarbons. The development and application of RALs for soil COCs was completed to

2-2

Find Rentdid Acrion Report Area of Conraniinnrion FS-9

September -7002

account for revision of 1996 Ecological STCLs for inorganic chemicals (Le., metals) (Gill, 2001). The ESD also changed the existing petroleum hydrocarbon cleanup levels by incorporating current MADEP S-1 cleanup standards using the VPH analytical procedure and the three hydrocarbon fractions detected using EPH analytical procedure.

The remedy presented in the FS-9 ROD was excavation and on-site cold-mix asphalt batching of recyclable contaminated soils, and excavation and off-site disposal of non-recyclable contaminated soils to be disposed of at a facility permitted to treat andor dispose of RCRA-hazardous waste.

Recyclable contaminated soils are defined as:

• Soils determined to be below RCRA TCLP allowable concentrations, • Or to contain contaminant concentrations below MADEP S-l/GW-l Standards for

pesticides, • Or to contain contaminant concentrations below the Massachusetts Permitted Soil

Recycling Facility (PSRF) Summary Levels established in the MADEP Interim Remediation Waste Policy for Petroleum Contamirrated Soils (MADEP, 1994).

Non-recyclable contaminated soils are defined as:

• Soils determined to be above RCRA TCLP allowable concentrations, • Or to contain contaminant concentrations above MADEP S-1IGW-1 Standards for

pesticides, • Or to contain contaminant concentrations above the Massachusetts PSRF Summary

Levels.

The ESD documented the decision to remove the on-site asphalt batching recycling component of the selected remedy on the grounds that:

• The majority of excavated soil from the SARAP ROD sites is non-recyclable, and • The amount of excavated soil from other sites.

It should be noted that the removal of the asphalt batching recycling component of the selected remedy for the FS-9 Site is not a change to the selected remedy because soil excavated from the FS-9 Site is considered non-recyclable. Therefore off-site disposal of the excavated soils from the FS-9 Site is compliant with the existing ROD.

Furthermore, the ESD documents the decision to allow for flexibility in off-site soil disposal on the grounds that recent waste characterization efforts indicate that none of the contaminated soil excavated at the FS-9 Site addressed in the ESD was RCRA hazardous waste. Therefore, this material could be disposed of at RCRA Subtitle D facilities.

As a result of these changes to the ROD, the ESD changed the remedy RALs as listed in the following tables. The ESD contains a discussion of the development of the RALs presented

2-3

Finn1 Retnediol .Iction Report .4ren of Contnniinnrion FS-9

Seplenrber 2002

below. Table 2-1

Contaminants of Concern and Respective Remedial Action Levels for FS-9 Site Soils

Contaminant of Concern Basis for Selection RAL ( m g w Lead Human Health 0 to 2 bgs 99

Ecological >2' bgs 300 Chromium (total) Ecological 19

Vanadium Ecological 47 Zinc Ecological 68

EPHNPH MCP Method 1 S-I/GW-1 See Table 2-2 Standards

Table 2-2

MCP Method S-l/GW-1 Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Type of Petroleum Hydrocarbons New RAL (mg/kg)

Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

Cs through Cg Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 100

C9 through Clz Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000

C9 through CIS Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000

Cl9 through Cj6 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 2,500

Aromatic Hydrocarbons

C9 through CIO Aromatic Hydrocarbons 100

CI1 through CZZ Aromatic Hydrocarbons 200

2-4

Find Remedial Action Report Area of Cor~mr~iirmrio~i FS-9

SeptetnBer 3002

3.0 REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

The following sections describe remedial construction activities performed at the source areas described in Section 2.1 of this report. It also describes the CSA soil stockpile management and disposition of soils removed from these source areas.

3.1 Detail A Activities

There were no excavation activities associated with Detail A. As discussed in Section 2.2 of this report, AFCEE conducted pre-design sampling analysis, and recommended No Further Action for the site (TNA, 2000a).

3.2 Detail B Remedial Excavation Activities

The following subsections describe the remedial actions at the FS-9 Detail B Site, the TPH hot spot, from the pre-remedial site status through excavation, confirmation sampling and analysis, and site restoration and closure.

3.2.1 Pre-Remediation Site Status

The ROD and the Source Area Remedial Design identified approximately 196 cy of soil which exceeded the cleanup level. The excavation boundaries were determined based on exceedence of the cleanup level for TPH presented in the ROD.

Delineation Sampling involved laying out the site in a grid and completing sampling and analysis to delineate excavation boundaries. Delineation soil sampling at Detail B consisted of the collection of surface and subsurface (2 to 20 ft bgs) soil samples by using geoprobe and hand auger techniques. Samples collected were field screened on-site using immunoassay test kits for analysis of TPH. Delineation sampling and analysis also consisted of off-site laboratory analysis for VPH and EPH.

Historical data had detected elevated TPH concentrations at sample location GP-6, at 16 ft bgs. However, the January 2001 delineation program included geoprobe sampling to a depth of 20 feet bgs at four locations surrounding former sample location GP-6. Analysis results indicated that there was no subsurface TPH contamination in excess of the cleanup level presented in the ROD at 16 feet bgs.

The Phase 1 Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) (ECC, 2002b) documents the delineation sampling program and presents sampling results for the FS-9 Detail B Site sampling and analysis. The sampling grid and sample points completed as part of the Phase I RAWP is shown on the Final FS-9 Detail Site Delineation Map, Figure 3-1. The revised excavation quantity was 70 cy.

A site visit was conducted at Detail B on April 21, 2001 with EPA, MADEP, AFCEE and ECC. It was agreed, at this meeting, that the excavation boundary needed to be moved to conform to

3-1

Find Rewedint Action Report Aren of Corit~t~ii~tntiori FS-9

September 2002

the existing topography.

Photographs were taken of the site prior to excavation and are presented in Appendix A.

3.2.2 Site Preparation

The initial site preparation procedure for the Detail B remedial actions was to provide notification of proposed construction activities in accordance with the MMR Utility Clearance requirements. ECC provided construction activity notification to the 102"d FW Base Civil Engineering Department and by contacting 1-800-Dig-Safe.

Silt fences and haybales were installed downgrade from the excavation site at Detail B to protect the vernal pool during excavation.

Clearing and grubbing activities occurred after the appropriate Dig Safe clearances were obtained. Only trees located within the excavation boundaries and in the direct path of access routes were removed. Grubbing consisted of the removal of stumps and root masses by use of a backhoe and/or excavator. Grubbing material was transported to the CSA site for temporary storage, and was later chipped and spread across a portion of the CSA away from the stockpile staging area.

There was no asphalt or concrete removal or demolition required for the excavation. There were no surface liquids present at the site.

3.2.3 Excavation

Excavation at Detail B commenced on April 30, 2001 and was completed on May 1, 2001. A track hoe excavator was used to excavate approximately 66 cy of soil, to an average depth of 2 ft bgs. The as-built limits of excavation are shown on Figure 3-2. The soil was excavated directly into dump trucks, and transported to the CSA for storage. A rubber-tired front-end loader was utilized at the CSA to manage the soil stockpiles. Air monitoring and dust suppression measures were implemented throughout the operation. Dust suppression consisted of the use of a water truck to wet down the excavation site and the CSA. Air monitoring is described in Section 5.2 of this report.

There was no debris, or unexpected conditions encountered during excavation activities.

Photographs taken of the FS-9 Detail B site during excavation activities and are presented in Appendix A.

3.2.4 Confirmation Sampling

Confirmation soil samples were collected from the Detail B excavation on April 30, 2001 to verify that cleanup goals had been obtained. Two samples were collected from the bottom of the excavation for VPH and EPH analysis. Results for both EPH and VPH were below the RALs

3-2

Final Remedial Action Reporl Area of Contaiirinnrion FS-9

September 2002

established for the site (Table 3-1). The final limits of excavation were located by use of Global Positioning System (GPS). The GPS system can record positions with submeter accuracy. All excavation comers and bottoms were located, as well as all confirmation soil sampling locations. The final limits of excavation and confirmatory sampling locations are shown on Figure 3-2.

A Data Summary Report (DSR), presenting confirmation data to support the Remedial Action completed at the FS-9 Site, is included in Appendix B.

3.2.5 Restoration

Restoration activities at the FS-9 Detail B Site were completed on June 21, 2001. The bottom and side slopes of the ditch were covered with erosion control matting; the bottom of the ditch was also lined with riprap. Approximately 19 tons of riprap was used during restoration activities.

3.2.6 Post-remediation Site Status

The final limits of excavation and confirmatory sampling locations are shown on Figure 3-2. The excavated soil volume of 66 cy was estimated from the GPS survey of the excavation

3.3 Detail C Remedial Excavation Activities

The following subsections describe the remedial actions at the FS-9 Detail C Site, the fence line hot spot, from the pre-remedial site status through excavation, confirmation sampling and analysis, and site restoration and closure.

3.3.1 Pre-remedial activity site status

The ROD and the Source Area Remedial Design identified approximately 15 cy of soil. The excavation boundaries were determined based on exceedences of lead, zinc and TPH cleanup levels presented in the ROD.

Delineation sampling, using hand augers, consisted of the collection of two (2) surface soil samples for TPH test kit analysis, and 30 soil samples (both surface and subsurface) for metals (zinc and lead) analysis at an off-site analytical laboratory. The two surface soil samples collected were field screened on-site using immunoassay test kits for analysis of TPH.

Additional delineation samples were collected in February 2001 for metals analysis to further delineate the extent of contamination at the site. Delineation sample results indicated TPH and lead present at concentrations exceeding the RALs which superceeded cleanup levels presented in the ROD. Zinc was not detected at concentrations above the RALs. Results of this sampling effort indicated that the volume of the excavation would be increased 50 cy, based on the lead and TPH exceedences. The final delineation map is provided in Figure 3-3.

Photographs were taken of the site prior to excavation and are presented in Appendix A.

3-3

Find Reitredid Actioii Report :lrm of Coirtnnriiznrion FS-9

September 2002

3.3.2 Site Preparation

The initial site preparation procedure for the Detail C remedial actions was to provide notification of proposed construction activities in accordance with the MMR utility clearance requirements. ECC provided construction activity notification to the 102”d FW Base Civil Engineering Department and by contacting 1-800-Dig-Safe.

Clearing and grubbing activities occurred after the appropriate Dig Safe clearances were obtained. Only trees located within the excavation boundaries and in the direct path of access routes were removed. Grubbing consisted of the removal of stumps and root masses by use of a backhoe and/or excavator. Grubbing material was transported to the CSA for temporary storage, and was later chipped and spread across the CSA.

There was no asphalt or concrete removal or demolition required for the excavation. There were no surface liquids present at the site.

3.3.3 Excavation

Excavation at Detail C commenced on April 26, 2001 and was completed on April 30, 2001. A track hoe excavator was used to excavate approximately 56 cy of soil to an average depth of 2-ft bgs. The as-built limits of the excavation are shown on Figure 3-4. The soil was excavated directly into dump trucks, and transported to the CSA for storage. A rubber-tired front-end loader was utilized at the CSA to manage the soil stockpiles. Air monitoring and dust suppression measures were implemented throughout the operation. Dust suppression consisted of the use of a water truck to wet down the excavation site and the CSA. Air monitoring is described in Section 5.2 of this report.

There was no debris, or unexpected conditions encountered during excavation activities.

Photographs taken of the FS-9 Detail C Site during excavation activities and are presented in Appendix A.

3.3.4 Confirmation Sampling

Confirmation soil samples were collected from the Detail 0 excavation on May 1, 2001. Samples were collected as specified in the Final Phase I EUWP. Non-VOC samples were collected from 0-4 inches and homogenized before containerization. VPH samples were collected at least six inches bgs and containerized immediately without mixing. Surface samples for metals analysis were composites of five aliquots collected in a cross pattem, with one location in the center of the cross, and four locations one foot from the center along the location of the grid axis. Sidewall samples were collected as if the side-wall was a horizontal surface.

Two samples were collected from the sidewalls of the excavation for lead, EPH and VPH analysis. One sample was collected from the bottom of the excavation for lead analysis.

3-4

Firm1 Reriicdial Action Report Aren of Conminination FS-9

Sepreniber 2002

Because, one VPH sample was misplaced at the laboratory, an additional replacement VPH sample was collected from Detail C on June 1, 2001. The final limits of excavation were located by use of GPS with submeter accuracy. All excavation comers and bottoms were located, as well as all confirmation soil sampling locations. Results for VPH and EPH analysis were below the RALs for the site. The exposure point average of the lead results was below the RAL for the site (Table 3-2). The final limits of excavation and confirmatory sampling locations are shown on Figure 3-4.

A DSR, presenting confirmation data to support the Remedial Action completed at the FS-9 Site, is included in Appendix B.

3.3.5 Restoration

Restoration activities at the FS-9 Detail C Site were completed between June 13 and June 14, 2001. Restoration consisted of backfilling with approximately 87 tons of clean imported backfill. Topsoil was then spread over the site and grass seed was applied by hand.

The source of the backfill material was Lawrence Lynch in Falmouth, Massachusetts. A sample of the backfill source was collected and analyzed for VPHI’EPH, pesticides, PCBs, metals, VOCs and SVOCs. Results indicated that the backfill material was deemed acceptable. Results of laboratory testing of this material are included in Appendix C.

3.3.6 Post Remedial Activity Site Status

The final limits of excavation and confirmatory sampling locations are shown on Figure 3-4. The excavated soil volume of 56 cy was estimated from the GPS survey of the excavation.

3.4 Stockpile Management and Disposition

Excavated soils were transported to the CSA for stockpiling and subsequent sampling. The soils from FS-9 were combined with soils from CS-10 (Details A, B, E, and H), CS-SA, FS-7, CS16/17C, FS-lOB, SD-3, CS-4 (USCG) and SD-5. These sites were all determined, through delineation sampling, to have similar soil disposal requirements (non-hazardous).

Stockpile soil sampling was required to fulfill the waste characterization requirements of the landfill. Samples were collected at a frequency of one sample per 500 tons, and were analyzed for the parameters regulated in the Reuse arid Disposal of Contciminated Soil at Mnssaclirwetts Laiid3lls, DEP Policy # COMM-97-001. These parameters include arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, TPH, PCBs, SVOCs, VOCs and conductivity. Twenty-seven grab samples were collected, using a Geoprobe. Samples were collected at locations and depths determined to be representative of the stockpile.

Samples results indicated five locations where metal concentrations in the stockpiled soil were above the theoretical levels at which the TCLP criteria may be exceeded (20 times rule). Therefore, soil samples from these locations also were analyzed for TCLP metals. Results were

3-5

Find Retnedinl .4ction Report Arm of Conroininntioii FS-9

Scptctnber 2002

below regulated TCLP levels, and therefore the stockpiled soil was considered non-hazardous material. Stockpiled soil sample results and MA Landfill Reuse Levels are presented in Appendix D. Based on the analytical results the stockpiled soil was determined to be acceptable at a Massachusetts Subtitle D landfill for daily cover.

The stockpiled soils were shipped as a non-hazardous material under a Massachusetts DEP Bill of Lading, to the Taunton Subtitle D Landfill. This landfill, located at 330 East Brittania Street in Taunton, Massachusetts, is a permitted Subtitle D lined landfill (Permit No SE/W003424). A copy of the Bill of Lading, documenting the soil disposal, is presented in Appendix E. A copy of the landfill acceptance letter is included in Appendix F.

3-6

Find Reitredo/ Actioti Report Aren of Contnr~rirm~ion FS-9

Septeriibcr 2002

4.0 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

Timelines listing the major events for both Details B and C are included in this section. The timelines begin with the ROD signature and includes significant milestones, ROD amendments, mobilization and construction of the remedy, sampling events, site restoration, required inspections and demobilization.

4-1

Date Activity

June 1999 i\FCEE :\ctibity

September 2000 AFCEE Activity

October I I , 2000 Field r\ctivity

December 5. 2000 Draft Addendum I Site-Specific Li'ork Plan

January 17-19. 2001 Field Activity

January 26, 2001 Laboratory Acrivity

February 12, 2001 Phase I Draft Remedial Action Work Plan

hlarch 1.2001 Weekly Regulatory hleeting

hlarch 20,200I Field Activity

Xpnl 19,200I Weekly Regulatory Meeting

Apni 21.2UUl Field Acriviry

.kpnl 30. 200I Fieid .Activity

May I.20101 Field Activity

May 2. 2001 AFCEE Actnity

May 16. 2001 Laboratory Activity

May 17,2001 Weekly Regulatory bleeting

May 23.2001 Field .Activity

June 21.7001 Field r\itiiit>

August 15.2001 AFC'EE. Actirity

September 7. 2001 Phase 11 Remedial .Action ii.ork Plan Draft

December 10, 2001 Field .-\ctivtty

December 19.2001 V-erklv.- Regulatory Meeting

December 28, 2001 Field Xcri\ity

January 24, 2002 Phase I1 Remedial .Action \i'ork Plan Final

May 29, 2002 Field Activity

FS-9 Detail B Final Remedial Action Report Area of Contamination FS-9

Timeline September 2002

Comments - Record oi Decisim. Area ol ~'ontamination FS-0, Final, tf.AZ\\'K..\P, is submit:ed. - Recommended e:(ca\atiun is I97 cubic yards. - Source Area Keniedial Iksign. ~olunie I -Cold Mix Asphait Batching Final Design for: CS-16 ,'17: FS-9, SD-2 FS-O'FS-8: FS-IS: FS-7: CS-IO:'FS-21: SD-3J~T.4-?.'CY-I; CS-5. CS--l(L'SCG),FS-l (L'SCG); DDOU: SD-5.FS-5; SD-4; CS-I I. TNSr Associates - Recommended e\.ca\aiim is IC17 cubic kards

- Sire \isit with J. Schooltield. U. Ta) Iur. K. Johnson. P. Ramas\\amy. - Site located along ditch war poner lines.

- Addendum I isstid n ith sampling plans for a11 jites.

- Delineation samples are collected nith Geoprobe and Hand Auger. - Delineation samp es are sent to laboratory.

- Delineation samp e results are receited by ECC.

- Phase I RXWP Draft Issued. - Recommended excavation is 251 cubic yards. - Delineation sample resulrs reviewed Juring meeting. - Excavation plan \$,ill be changed based on topography.

- Proposed ditch excavation is surveyed with GPS.

- Proposed excavation is approved. - Contimation sampling plan approved

- Site visit with EPA. MADEP. AFCEE and ECC. - Excaxation boundar]. is mo\ed based on topography. - Excavation besins. - Silt fence installed to prarect vernal unnd downstream. - Excavarion is comeleted. - Confirziation samples are collected and sent to laborator) - Contimation sample locations are sumeyed b\ith GPS.

- EP.1 accepts AFCIIE re\.iscd R4L for lead - ,111 delineation of sires aith lead as a COC 3re effected

- Contimation sample results are receiLed by ECC.

- Confirmation sample results are re\ieued. - Backfilling of excavation is approved

- Excavation and coritimation locations are sunejed with GPS.

- E'ica\ation is back:illed 'irith rip rap and erosion control mat. - silt fence is left in place to protect \emal pond.

- AFCEE directs ECC not to use the asphait batching option. - All eucaiated material \\ill he sent for offsite disposal.

- Phase II R;\\\.P intt:mal draft issued to AFCEE. - Exca~ated boii 1\i11 he rec!cled at a MA. landtill as non-hazardous. - Estim-ted e~ca\ation \olume is ' 0 < >

- Transportation and di,p<rsal of non-hazardous stockpile begins. - ;\ppro\imately IO.OOO ton:<. including F5-9 soils. \rill be shipped offsite

- Sire risit \\ith EP.4. DtP. AFCEE and ECC'. - Tour oi Source ,\re,i excacations I\here Backfilling is complete - .Additional rip rap I:, requested fur the ditch.

- Transportation and 1isposaI of FS-9 soils is complete.

- Phase II RAW P Final issued to AFCEE. - Excavated soil \\ill be recycled at a \la. landtill as non-haz.

Additional riprap added tu ditch.

4-2

Fiirol Remedial Action Report FS-9 Detail C Area o/ Coirtniiriiiorioir FS-9

Timeline Scptember 2002

Date Activity Comments June I999 AfC'EE Acu\ity • Record of Decision. Area of C o n t x " t i o n FS-Y. Final. HAZ\\'RAP. is submitted.

- Kecomended e~ca\ation I i ? cubic yards. September 2000 AICEE hCll\ltL - 5ource hrea Remedial Lkjign. ~ oliinie ­ C old Mix Asphalt Hatching Final Lksign tor:. AU

CS-16.17: FS-9 . SD-2 FS-6,FS-S: FS-iY: FS-7. CS-I0 FS-?-I: SD-3,FTA-3 C1.4:CS-5: CS--I(L'SCG):FS-I (C SCG): DDO C : SD-.(:FS-5: SD-4: CS-I I. N& Associakj. - Rscomtnd d exca\ation is 15 cubic !drds.

October 1I. 2000 Field :\ctiiity - Sits visit with J. Schoolticld. R. Ta)lor. K. Johnson. P. Ramas\$amy. - Sitc locatcd alon: ience IIIX

Decembcr 5. 2000 Dratt Addendum 4 Site-Specitic \ to r i - :\d&ndum 4 ijSUed ivih sampling plans tor a11 sites. Plan

December IS. 2000 Field Activity - Delineation sample locations are sur>e)ed 41th GPS.

January 16-17. 200I Field Activity - Uelinsation samples are ccllected and sen1 to laborator?. - Fuel odor reporred during sampling.

February 5. 2001 Laboratory ActiLit) • Delinexion sample results are recsiicd by ECC.

February 8. 2001 AFCEE Activity - EPA accepts AFCEE revised ecological RAL changes. - All delineation of sites with ecological driven COC are effected.

February 12.2001 Phase 1 Remedial Action VV ork Plan - Phase 1 RAWP Draft Issued. Draft - Recomended etcar ation is 80 cubic >arJs.

February 13.2001 Field Activity - Delineation samples are collected and sent to laboratory

March 2. 1001 Laboratory Activity - Delinearton sample results Ire recei\ed by ECC.

Apnl 19. 2001 LVeekl? Regulatory Meeting - Delineation sample results *e\ ietwd dunng meeting. • Proposed excavation plan approved. - Confrmation sampling plan anproved.

Apnl 26. 2001 Field. Activity - Ewavanon begin5

Apnl 60.2001 Field .Activity - Ewa\ation is completed.

May I.ZOO1 Field Activity - Contimarion samples are collected and sent to laboratop.

May 2. 2001 AFCEE Activity - EPA accepts AFCEE RAL -"or lead. - All delineation of sites with lead as a COC are effected.

May i. 2001 Field Activity - Excavation and contirmation locations are surveyed with GPS.

May 11.2001 Laboratory Activity - Confirmation sample result;, are received by ECC.

May 15. 2001 Laboratory Activity - Laboratory reports loosing one confirmation sample.

May 23. 2001 Field Activity - Excavation and confirmation locations are resurveyed with GPS.

June 1.2001 Field Activity - Confirmation samples are recollected. - Confirmation sample locations are surveyed with GPS. - Excavation boundaries are surveyed with GPS.

June 13. 2001 Weekly Regulator Meeting - Confirmation sample results are rev-.ewed. - Backfilling of excavation is approved.

June 13-14.2001 Field Activity - Excavation ts backfilled.

August 15.2001 AFCEE Activity • AFCEE directs EC C not to i,se the asphalt batching option. - All excavated material will be sent for offsite disposal.

September ". 2001 Phase il Remedial Action Work Plan - Phase 11 RAWP internal draft issued to AFCEE. Draft - Excavated soil will be recycled at a MA. landfill as non-hazardous.

- Estimated excavation volume is 5C cubic yards.

December 10.2001 Field Activity - Transportation arid disposal ot non-hazardous stockpile begins. - Approximately iQ.ooo tons, including FS-9 soils, will be shipped offsite.

December 19.2001 Weeklv Regulatory Meet;nL' - Sue visit with EPA. MADEP. AFCEE and ECC. - Tour of Source Area excavations where backfilling is complete.

December 23.200; Field Activity • Transportation and disposal ot FS-9 soils is complete.

January 24. 2002 Phase 11 Remedial Action Work Plan - Phase 11 RAWP Final issued to AFCEE. Final - Excavated soil will be recvcled at a MA landfill as non-haz.

4-5

Find Reiiiedinl Acrion Reporr Arcn of Co~trn~~ritinriorz FS-9

Seprember ZOO2

5.0 QUALITY CONTROL AND HEALTH AND SAFETY

The following two sections describe project quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) activities, as well as the project health and safety activities during the construction remedial actions.

5.1 Quality Program Plan

A Quality Program Plan (QPP) was developed by AFCEE for the Comprehensive Plume Response Plan at MMR (Jacobs, 2000). This QPP was adopted by ECC for use in managing the Multiply Source Remediation Project at MMR. The QPP provides a complete description of the QA measures required to complete remedial action program activities. There are two main components to the QPP as described below.

The Construction Quality Plan (CQP) is intended to ensure that completed activities meet or exceed all design criteria, plans, and specifications and that all contract quality objectives are met. The CQP addresses construction operations both on-site and off-site, including work done by subcontractors, fabricators, suppliers, and purchasing agents. All subcontractor personnel are required to adhere to the requirements of the CQP. The CQP has a three-phase inspection system, which requires inspections at various stages of work activity. Inspections are conducted for the preparatory, initial and completion stages of each definable feature of work or activity. Copies of inspection reports are available in the project files.

The Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) is applicable for all work conducted at MMR on behalf of AFCEE. It outlines the program's quality control objectives and describes a comprehensive set of sampling, analysis QNQC, data validation and assessment guidelines.

Variances from the QC program are documented through nonconformance reports (NCRs). There were no NCRs issued specifically for the FS-9 Site remediation. However, there were project-wide NCRs, which affected numerous Source Area Remediation Sites. The NCRs are described below and are attached in Appendix G.

ECC-MMR-DO19-016 Change in grass seed mixture for site restoration ECC-MMR-DO19-017 Use of Concover for stockpiled soil in lieu of 6-mil thick

polyethylene sheeting ECC-MMR-DOl9-019 Disposal of decontamination water at Jacobs Engineering in lieu of

off-site disposal at a commercial facility.

A DSR which addresses analytical QNQC issues for the FS-9 confirmation data is included in Appendix B.

5.2 Health and Safety

ECC conducted all work activities in compliance with the approved Site Health and Safety Plan (SHSP), prepared by ECC specifically for the Multiple Source Remediation Project at MMR.

5-1

Firid Remedial Action Report Aren of Coiitniirinniioii FS-9

Septotiber 2001

Real time air monitoring was conducted during excavation activities for both airborne dust and VOCs. Readings indicated no airborne dust or VOCs. Both real time monitoring (for VOCs and dust) and Summa Canister (VOCs) monitoring was conducted at the CSA during soil transport and stockpiling activities. Real time monitoring results were below the action levels established in the approved SHSP, as were Summa Canister results.

5-2

Find Remedial Action Report Area oJ’ Contnnrinnrion FS-9

September -7002

6.0 FINAL INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATIONS

An inspection of the FS-9 Site remediation was completed on Dec 19, 2001 with representative of EPA, MADEP, AFCEE, and ECC. It was noted at this inspection that additional riprap was required at the FS-9 Detail B Site to adequately control erosion in the drainage ditch. The additional riprap was added on May 29, 2002. The inspection did not identify any deficiencies at the FS-9 Detail C Site.

The requirements of the SHSP were adhered to throughout the execution of the FS-9 Site remediation. No significant safety concems were associated with remediation of the FS-9 Site.

6-1

Find Remedid Actioti Report Area of Conmrninotion FS-9

September 2002

7.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

There are no post-construction operation and maintenance activities required at the FS-9 Site, for Details B or C. There are no brush or grass mowing requirements.

The results of the pre-design sampling event (Le. no subsurface contamination) indicated that the groundwater monitoring component of the remedy was no longer required.

7-1

Find Rernedinl Action Report Awn of Corrtnriiinntioti FS-9

Septeriiber 2002

8.0 SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS

This section summarizes the estimated and actual costs for the remedial activities conducted at the FS-9 Detail B and C Sites.

8.1 Estimated Cost to Complete - Excavation and Off-Site Disposal

The ROD selected remedy for the FS-9 Sites was Excavation and On-Site Asphalt Batching andor Off-Site Disposal, with a contingency for In-Situ Low Flow Soil Vapor Extraction. This remedy included the following potential definable features of work:

• A soil treatability study; • Equipment and personnel mobilization and site preparation; • Performing pre-excavation delineation soil sampling; • Excavation and stockpiling of soil; • Suitability testing of soils for cold mix asphalt batching; • Ex-situ cold mix asphalt batching; . Post-excavation confirmatory sampling; . Backfilling and restoration; . Low flow in-situ soil vapor extraction; • Maintaining site access controls that limit potential human exposure to contaminants; . Groundwater monitoring; and • Five year review.

The ROD estimation for excavation volumes were as follows:

FS-9 Detail A: 783 cubic yards; FS-9 Detail B: 196 cubic yards; and FS09 Detail C: 15 cubic yards.

Based on the above items, the ROD estimated cost were:

Capital Costs: $267,068 • Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs: S 196,458

Estimated total cost: $501,175

The estimated costs are shown as "present worth" circa 1999. The present worth is based on a 5 percent discount rate and assuming Operation and Maintenance for five years (HAZW 1998).

8.2 Actual Cost to Complete - Excavation and Off-Site Disposal

Estimated final costs include all labor, equipment and materials required to conduct the remedial action, including analytical costs, backfill costs, site restoration and transport and disposal of contaminated soils. Soils were disposed of at a Massachusetts Subtitle D landfill as daily cover material. The costs are tabulated below:

Fii’nnl Reiiiedinl Action Report Arcn of Conirrnrinntion FS-9

Srplembo. 3002

Table 8-1

Estimated Final Costs

Task cost FS-9 Detail B Site

Delineation sampling and analysis $ 8,767 Excavation $6,191 Confirmation Sampling and analysis $1,651 Backfill and restoration $5,033 Transportation and Disposal of excavated soil

$13,191

Total Cost $34,832 FS-9 Detail C Site

Delineation sampling and analysis $9,814 Excavation $ 9,287 Confirmation Sampling and analysis $3,014 Backfill and restoration 5 2,403 Transportation and Disposal of excavated soil

$6,319

Total Cost $30,837

The total cost for remedial activities at the FS-9 Detail B and C Sites was $65,669.

8.3 Cost Comparison

The estimated RA cost of $65,669 is 87 percent lower than the ROD Estimate of $501,175. A comparison in costs is presented below.

ROD Estimate EstimateEsti

Unit Rate Costs S504.2icy $538/cy Cubic Yards 994 cy 122 cy Total cost $501,175 $65,669

The difference in costs can be attributed to the following reasons.

The remedial design activities resulted in a "No Further Action" at FS-9 Detail A. Delineation sampling reduced the excavation volume at the FS-9 Detail B Site, and increased the amount of excavation volume at the FS-9 Detail C Site. These changes resulted in an overall decrease in excavation volume by 88 percent. The remedial design activities and the delineation sampling did not prompt a need for

8-2

Find Remedial Action Report Awn of Cotitntninntion FS-9

September 2002

utilizing the SVE contingency. Application of new RALs impacted volumes of soil requiring excavation. The selected remedy included deletion of on-site asphalt batching, the addition of off-site disposal and allowing soil to be disposed of at a Subtitle D Landfill (contingent upon the soil being RCRA non-hazardous). There are no direct operation and maintenance activities associated with this site.

8-3

Final Rerriedinl .Icliori Report Area of Cotitnniirinrion FS-9

Septeriiber 2002

9.0 OBSERVATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED

There were lessons learned during the implementation of the Multiple Site Source Area Remediation at MMR. Most lessons learned were project-wide and not specific to the FS-9 Site remedial actions.

Management of the Central Storage Area - Considerable savings in time and resources was realized by the use of a spray-on construction cover to secure the stockpiled soil. Originally, 6-mil polyethylene sheeting was utilized for daily cover. The use of polyethylene sheeting was time consuming to install, and required constant maintenance.

• Weighing of Trucks - Trucks transporting soil from the various source areas, to the CSA were initially not weighed. However, due to the variations in density for the soil from different sites, it was difficult to determine the mass of the stockpile soil for transport and disposal purposes. The receiving landfill requires one soil sample to be analyzed for every 500 tons of soil to be disposed for soil characterization purposes. During the initial disposal effort, the number of samples was estimated based on a survey of the stockpile and an assumed soil density. Currently, to better quantify the soil for sampling and disposal, the trucks are weighed empty and full prior to stockpiling soil in the CSA, to obtain accurate tonnage of material delivered to the CSA.

ECC initiated a weekly QC meeting with ECC and AFCEE QA personnel. This meeting improved communications with AFCEE QA personnel, and promoted the timely resolution of QNQC issues.

The ECC QC Manager prepared a binder for field sampling personnel, which contained all appropriate QC Standard Operating Procedures for the current task. This allowed the sampling efforts to be implemented in a more efficient manner.

9-1

Find Reiiiediol Action Report Area of Corttoniinotion FS-9

Septenrber 2002

10.0 OPERABLE UNIT CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact Information for the regulatory agencies, and AFCEE are as follows:

Mr. Paul Marchessault U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1Suite 11001 Congress Street Boston, MA 02114-2023(888) 372-7341

Mr. Leonard Pinaud Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Region 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 (508) 446-2700

Mr. Jon Davis Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence 322 East Inner Road Box 41Otis Air National Guard Base, MA 02542-5028(508) 563-4670 ext. 4952

10-1

Find Reiiiedinl Action Report Aren of Contnniinnrion FS-9

Septenrber 2002

11.0 REFERENCES

ABB-ES, 1992. Simp Pump Removal Action Program, Phase I, Sump Pump Investigation Program Work Completion Report, Installation Restoration Program, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, prepared for HAZWRAP, Portland, Maine, October. Prepared by ABB­ES for the Air National Guard.

ABB-ES, 1993. Drizji Priority 2 arid 3 Study Areas Site Investigation, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, ABB Environmental Services, Inc. October. Prepared by ABB-ES for the Air National Guard.

AEHA (U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency), 1986. Geohydrologic Study No. 38-26-0500-86, Camp Edwards, Massachusetts, July 8-20 and Sept 9-17, 1985, April 1986.

ECC, 2002a. Final Phase I Remedial Action Work Plan, Multiple Source Area Remediation at Massachusetts Militan Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, May. Prepared by ECC for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

ECC, 2002b. Final Phase 11 Remedial Action Work Plan, Multiple Source Area Remediation at Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. January. Prepared by ECC for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

Gill, 2001. Letter from Robert M. Gill to Paul Marchessault, Jan 25, 2001.

HAZWRAP, 1996. Soil Target Cleanup Levels, DSRP; InstalIation Restoration Program; Massachusetts Military Resewation, January. Prepared by HAZWRAP for the Air National Guard.

HAZWRAP, 1998a Final Feasibility Studv Area of Contamination FS-9, Installatiori Restoration Program, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, September. Prepared by HAZWRAP for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

HAZWRAP, 1998b. Remedial Investigation Report Area of Contnn~iriation FS-9, Installation Restoration Program, Massachiuetts Militay Resentation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October. Prepared by HAZWRAP for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

HAZWRAP, 1999a. Record of Decision, Areti of Contaminatiori FS-9, Final, June. Prepared by HAZWRAP for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

HAZWRAP, 1999b. Drainage Structiire Removal Progikm Remedial Action Summary Report, Final, January. Prepared by Harding Lawson Associates for the Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

11-1

Find Rernediol Action Report Aim o/ Co!rlntni!inrion FS-9

September -7002

Jacobs, 2000. Qiralily Program Plan, Massaclirrsetts Milirar), Reservation, Plirme Response Pro,ol-ain, September 2000. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

MADEP, l994. Interim Remediation Waste Policj3 for Petroleiim Contaminated Soils, DEP Policy ttWSC-94-400.

MADEP, 1997, Reuse and Disposal of Coritnnrirrated Soil at Massachusetts Landfills, DEP Policy # COMM-97-001, August.

Portage, 2002. Explanation of Significant Dgfferences Areiis of Contaniintion CS-I0 (A, B, &C); CS-I6KS-17; FS-9; SD-2/FS-6/FS-8; and SD-3/FTA-3/CY-4. Installation Restoration Program, Massachusetts Military Reservation, October 2002. Awaiting signature.

TNA, 2000a. Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Pre-Design Sampling and Analysis Report for CS-1O/FS-24, Additional Soil Sampling at CS-1O/FS-24 Birildings 4602 & 4606, Data and Evaliiation for SVE/Biosparging Design, Wetlands Determination and Delineation Studies at CS-IO/Fs-24 and FS-18, Pre-Excavation Study and Soil Sampling at SD-4, Geoph-vsical Investigation of the DDOU, and Confirmatory Soil Sampling at SD-5/FS-5, Confirmatory Soil Sampling at FS-9, Draft, June. Prepared by TN&A for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

TNA, 2000b. Massachusetts Militay Reservation, Cape Cod, Source Areas Remedial Design-Cold-Mix Asphalt Botching: Find Design for CS-l6/17; FS-9; SD-2/FS-8; FS-18; FS-7; CS-1O/FS-.?4; SD-3/FTA-3/CY-4; CS-5; CS-4 (USCG)/FS-1 (IjSCG); DDOU; SD-5/FS-6; SD-4; CS-II. September. Prepared by TN&A for Air Force Center of Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).

Technical Memorandum, 2000, Revised Ecological Soil Target Cleanup Levels for Inorganics, Final December.

Shallow Soil Background Evaluation for the Camp Edwards Impact Area Groundwater Quality Study, iMMR, Cape Cod, MA, January 2001.

USEPA, 1994. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.

11-2

TAABLES

AOC Sample Location 09BHC7IO1 ­

bottom FS-9 Detail B 09BHC7102­Confirmation bottom

FIELDQC (trip blank)

AOC Sample Location 09BHC7IO1 -

FS-9 Detail B bottom Confirmation 09BHC7102­

bottom

J - Estimated result

mgikg - milligrams per kilogram

RAL - Remedial Action Level

U - Undetect

UJ - Estimated non detect

TABLE 3-1 FS-9 Detail B

Confirmation Sample Results

VPH (Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mg/kg

CS-CS C9-Ct2 C9-C10 Sampling Date Sample Number .\liphatics Aliphatics Aromatics

430~01 09BHC7101003 5.6 u 1.1 c 1.7 U

Jl30lO1 09BHC7102003 09BHC7102003 FD

5.1 U 6.5 U

1.0 U 1.3 U

1.5 U 1.9 C

430101 09TBC7190 5.0 U 1.0 c ' 1.5 u

R\L (mgikg) 100 1000 100

EPH (Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mg/kg

C9-C18 C19-C36 c11-c22 Sampling Date Sample Number Alphatics Aliphatics Aromatics

4i3OiO1 09BHC7101003 3.2 c 89J 28.0

4/30/01 09BHC7102- 3.1 U 4.2 UJ 8.9 U

RAL (mg:kg) 1000 2500 200

1 of 1

TABLE 3-2 FS-9 Detail C

Confirmation Sample Results

VPH (Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mg/kg

Sample Sampling cs-cs C9-Cl2 C9-C10 AOC Location Date Sample \;umber Aliphatics Allphatics Aromatics

09BHC7172­

sidewall 6 1 1,01 09BHC7122003 4.8 U 0 9 6 U 1 1 4 u

FS-9 Detail C

Confirmation

09BHC7124­

sidewall 4/30,01

09BHC7I24003

09BHC7124003FD

5.2 U

5.5 U

1 o u

11 U

1 6 U

1.7 U FIELDQC 61If01 09TBC3701 5.0 U 10 15 U

FIFLDOC 4i3OiO1 09TBC7170 5.0 U 1 o r 1.5 U

RAL (mgikg) 100 1000 100

EPH (Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mg/kg

Sample Sampling C9-Cl8 Ci9-C36 c11-c22 AOC Location Date Sample Number Alpha tics ;\liphatics .Aromaha

09BHC7122-4130:Ol 09BHC7122003 7.9 U 94.0 8.3 U

FS-9 Detail C sidewall Confirmatlon 09BHC7124- 09BHC7124003 3.0 C 1OOJ 8.5 u

j ,30,01 sidewall 09BHC7124003FD 2.9 L 375 8.3 U

R4L (mgikg) 1000 2500 200

Metals (mg/kg) Ecological or

Sample Sampling Human Health

40C +Location Date Sample Number Pb (Lead) RAL (mgkg) Risk based RAL

09BHC7122 ­43001 09BHC7122003 1q9 99 Ecological

sidewall FS-9 Detail C 09BHC7173-

4/30101 09BHC7123003 106 30Ob Human Health Confirmation bottom

09BHC7124- 09BHC7124003 105 99 Ecological 4/30/01

sidewall 09BHC7124003FD 8 9 99 Ecological

- VPH sample broken in lab, so resampled on 6 1 0 1 b - Lead R4L of 300 mgkg IS for soils at depths greater than 2' bgs

J - Estimated result

mgikg - milligrams per kilogram

RAL - Remedial Action Level

U - Undetect

UJ - Estimated non detect

1 of 1

FIGURES

VER. / N.H. REV REVISIONS DATE APPROVE[ NY. RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT 09-09-02

/

BUZZARDS BAY

NANTUCKET SOUND

WOODS H< APPROXIMATE SCALE IN MILES

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION 5 KlTTRlDGE ROAD

OTISANGB, MA 02542

FIGURE 1-1 MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION

CAPE COD, MASSACHUSETTS OCATION

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION 'ROJECT CODE CONTRACT CODE DRAW BY DATE

5422.019 F41624-97-D-8009 EH SAHAGIAN 10-18-00 SCALE SHEET NO REVISION

NOT TO SCALE 1 OF1 A

EVl REVISIONS DATE APPROVED

RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT 09-09-02 B.B.T.M

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY

RESERVATION DETAIL C (FENCE LINE

HOT SPOT)

DETAILS (TPH HOT SPOT) \

MMR OVERVIEW 3 4_

SCALE IN MILES

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION 5 KlTTRlDGE ROAD

OTIS ANGB, MA 02542

FIGURE 1-2 FS-9

SITE MAP CCATION

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION PROJECT.

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION PROJECT CODE CONTRACT CODE DRAW BY DATE

5422.019 F41624-97-D-8009 E.H. SAHAGIAN 10-18-00 SIZE

B SCALE SHEET NO REVISON

AS SHOWN 1 OF1

GP-S yANALYTE

TPH DEPTH

0.0' 4.0'

1994 CONC

808 712

'GE,-2% /AjjamE^—

M -D£ET±L

0.0'

1994 _CQN£._

531

TP-10 .ANALYJE

TPH

1994 EPTH

60'1 CONC

6.920

REV REVISIONS

RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT

DATE

09-09-02

AF'PROVEC

B.B.

8.0' 626

GP-8

16.0' 716

1994 //

7TBV1 1994 TP-11

ANALYTE /

DEPTW 1994

CONC. ANALYTE

TPH DEPTH

0.0'

CONC.

577 /

/ /ANALYTE

/ TPH

DEPTH

0.0' CONC.

865 TPH

C5-C8ALIPHATICS OjO' o'o'

i

4.500 800

SEE NOTE 6 0

LEGEND DESCRIPTION

MONITORING WELL

SAMPLE WITH RESULTS ABOVE ROD CLEANUP LEVELS

SAMPLE WlTH RESULTS BELOW ROD CLEANUP LEVELS

SAMPLING GRID ­ 30.0' X 30.01 BLOCKS

PROPOSED EXCAVATION

09DP7104ANALYTE

TPH

C5 -C8 ALIPHATICS

\ 01/01 DEPTH

0.0-2$; 0.0-2.0'

CONC. 836.4

\ 718 FENCE LINE

TOPOGRAPHY CONTOUR LINE IN FT. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEI

POWER POLE

NOTES 1. ALL ANALYTE RESULTS ARE IN mg/kg.

ALL DEPTHS ARE IN bgs (BELOW GROUND SURFACE). 3. ONLY COCs ABOVE ROD CLEANUP LEVELS ARE

DEPICTED. ADDITIONAL ANALYTICAL DATA IS INCLUDED

PAVEMENT IN THE DATA SUMMARY REPORT.

4. PROPOSED EXCAVATION TO BE AT DEPTH OF 2' bgs.

EDGE 5. ESTIMATED EXCAVATION VOLUME IS 70 CUBIC YARDS. 6. PRECISE SAMPLE LOCATIONS ARE UNKNOWN FOR

GP-6, GP-8, GP-25, TB-1, TP-10 AND TP-11. FOR GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THESE SAMPLE LOCATIONS REFER TO FIGURE 2-4 IN THE FS-9 ROD.

BLDG ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATIOE 5 KITTRIDGE ROAD

1367 OTIS ANGB. MA 02542

FIGURE 3-1 FS-9 DETAIL B TPH HOT SPOTS

DRAit\A0E SWALE DELINEATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS

MASSACHUSETS MILITARY RESERVATION

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION SCALE IN FEET CONTRACT CODE

F41624-97-D-8009 lDRAW BY

E.H. SAHAGIAN DATE

-D-8009 SCALE SHEET NO REVlSl C

AS SHOWN I OF I

REV REVISIONS DATE APPROVED RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT 09-0942 x.

\ r LEGEND SYM DESCRIPTION

MONITORING WELL

0 CONFIRMATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS

SAMPLING GRID - 300' X 30 0' BLOCKS

mm SURVEYED EXCAVATION

TOPOGRAPHY CONTOUR LINE IN FT. ABOVE MEAN SEA LWE I

POWER POLE

PAVEMENT FENCE ~ E J

EDGE NOTES 1. EXCAVATION DEPTH AS NOTED. 2. EXCAVATION VOLUME IS 50 CUBIC YARDS. 3. EXCAVATION WAS SURVEYED USING A GPS UNIT. 4. CONFIRMATION SAMPLE RESULTS ARE IN TABLE 3-1.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMtCAL CORPORATIOP 5 KlTTRlDGE ROAD

OTIS ANGB, MA 02542

F IGUR E 3-2 FS-9 DETAI L B T P H HO T SPOT S

EXCAVATION BOUNDARY AND CONFIRMATION SAMPLE LOCATION -0CATION

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION

0' 50' JROJECT

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION PROJECT CODE CONTRACT CODE DRAWN BY

SCALE IN FEET 5422.019

SIZE

B F41624-97-D-8009 EH .

SCALE

AS SHOWN

SAHAGIAN 10-18-00 SHEET NO

I OF I R E V 1 9 0

A

REV REVISIONS DATE APPROVED s s - 1 1994 RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT 09-09-02 B.B.T,

ANALYTE DEPTH CONC. LEAD 0 ' 767.0 ZINC 0 ' 62.1

SEE NOTE 6

PAVEMENT EDGE

09DP7132 01/01 ANALYTE DEPTH CONC. LEGEND

DESCRIPTION LEAD 0'-2' 97.9 SAMPLE WITH RESULTS ABOVE ROD CLEANUP LEVELS

SAMPLE WITH RESULTS BELOW ROD CLEANUP LEVELS 0 MOTOR POOL PROPOSED EXCAVATION

SAMPLING GRID - 150' x 150'BLOCKS

TOPOGRAPHY CONTOUR LINE IN FT. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL AREA (PAVED) FENCE LINE

NOTES COCs 1. ALL ANALYTE RESULTS ARE IN mg/kg. ANALYTE

09DP7130 01/01 LEAD 2. ALL DEPTHS ARE IN bgs (BELOW GROUND SURFACE). ZINC

ANALYTE DEPTH CONC. 3. ONLY COCs ABOVE ROD CLEANUP LEVELS ARE LEAD O'-2' 145 DEPICTED. ADDITIONAL ANALYTICAL DATA IS INCUDED TPH 0'-2'] 658.8

IN THE DATA SUMMARY REPORT. 4. PROPOSED EXCAVATION TO BE AT DEPTH OF 2' bgs. 5. ESTIMATED EXCAVATION VOLUME IS 50 CUBIC YARDS. 6. PREVIOUS SAMPLE LOCATION IS UNKNOWN FOR SS-1.

FOR GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE SAMPLE

09DP7125 01/01 LOCATION REFER TO FIGURE 2-4 IN THE FS-9 ROD. ANALYTE DFPTH CONC.

LEAD O'-2' 269

BLDG ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION 5 KITTRIDGE ROAD

OTIS ANGB, MA 02542 1369 FIGURE 3-3

FS-9 DETAIL C FENCE LINE HOT SPOTS DELINEATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS

LOCAIION

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION PROJECT

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION 0' 50' PROJECT CODE. CONTRACT CODE DRAW BY DATE

5422.019 F41624-97-D-8009 EH . SAHAGIAN 10-18-00 SIZE

B SCALE SHEET NO REVISION SCAtE IN FEET

AS SHOWN 1 OF1 A

REV REVISIONS DATE APPROVED

A RELEASED FOR FINAL CLOSURE REPORT 09-09-02 BB.T\vr"

PAVEMENT EDGE

MOTOR POOL AREA (PAVED) / O0SBWC7123

09BHC7124

BLDG 1369

0' 0'

SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND SYM DESCRIPTION

CONFIRMATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS 0

SAMPLING GRID- 30.0" X 30.0'BLOCKS

SURVEYED EXCAVATION

TOPOGRAPHY CONTOUR LINE IN FT. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL

FENCE LINE

NOTES 1. EXCAVATION DEPTH AS NOTED. 2. EXCAVATION VOLUME IS 48 CUBIC YARDS. 3. EXCAVATION WAS SURVEYED USING A GPS UNIT. 4. CONFIRMATION SAMPLE RESULTS ARE IN TABLE 3-2.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION 5 KITTRIDGE ROAD

OTIS ANGB, MA 02542

F IGUR E 3-4 FS-9 DETAI L C FENC E LINE HO T SPO T

EXCAVATION BOUNDARY AND CONFIRMATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS LOCATION.

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION PROJECT

MULTIPLE SITE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION PROJECT CODE CONTRACT CODE DRAVW BY DATE

5422.019 F41624-97-D-8009 EH. SAHAGIAN 10-18-00 SIZE

B SCALE' SHEET NO. REVISION

AS SHOWN 1 OF1 A

Appendix A

Photographs

FS-9 Detail M l.iuiig u^si pnoi k> c\wi\ J

FS-9 Detail B facing west during excavation.

FS-y Detail B facing west. Restoration complete.

FS-9 Detail C facing northeast prior to excavation.

FS-9 Detail C facing south during excavation

FS-9 Detail C facing north during backfilling.

FS-9 Detail C facing south after backfilling.

I S-9 Detail C facing north. Restoration complete.

MMR Doc. No.

15624

FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

AREA OF CONTAMINATION FS-9

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION CAPE COD, MASSACHUSETTS

Prepared for:

AFCEENMR Installation Restoration Program

322 East Inner Road Otis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Contract No. F41624-97-D-8009 Delivery Order 0019

September 2002

Environmental Chemical Corporation 5 Kittridge Road

Otis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Appendix B

Data Summary Report

DATA SUMMARY REPORTFOR AREA OF CONTAMINATION FS-9

MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION CAPE COD, MASSACHUSETTS

Prepared for:

AFCEEMMR Installation Restoration Program

322 East Inner Road Otis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Contract No. F41624-97-D-8009 Delivery Order: 0019

September 2002

Environmental Chemical Corporation 5 Kittridge Road

Otis ANGB, Massachusetts 02542

Dnto Simminr-J~ Report for Areo of Contnminntion FS-9 Massachusetts Militar)' Reservation, Cape Cod, MA

Scpteniber 3002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION 1-1

2.0 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 2-1

3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES 3-1

4.0 DATA VALIDATION 4-1

5.0 PRECISION. ACCURACY. REPRESENTATIVENESS. COMPLETENESS AND COMPARABILITY 5-1

5.1 PRECISION 5-1

5.1.1 Field Precisiori 5-1 5.1.2 Laboi-atov Precision 5-2

5.2 ACCURACY 5-2

5.2.2 Field Accurac); 5-2 5.2.2 Laboratory Accuracy 5-2

5.2.2.1 Sample Holding Times and Preservation 5-3 5.2.2.2 Instrument Calibration 5-3 5.2.2.3 Laboratory Blanks 5-3 5.2.2.4 Matrix Spikes 5-3 5.2.2.5 Laboratory Control Samples 5-4 5.2.2.6 Surrogate Spikes 5-4

5.3 REPRESESTATIVENESS 5-4

5.4 COMPLETENESS 5-5

5.4.1 Field Completeness 5-5 5.4.2 Labol-atoiy Conipleteness 5-5

5.5 COMPARABILITY 5-6

6.0 SENSITIVITY 6-1

7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION AND RESOLUTION 7-1

8.0 SUMMARY 8-1

9.0 REFERENCES 9-1

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 Sample Results

Dntn Slirrimag. Report for Area of Coiitnminnrion FS-9 Mnnssncliusetrs Militm,, Resenntion, Cope Cod, MA

September 2002

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AFCEE Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence

CLP contract laboratory program

COC chain-of-custody

DQO data quality objective

EB equipment blank ECC Environmental Chemical Corporation EPH extractable petroleum hydrocarbons FD field duplicate FS fuel spill

LCS laboratory control sample LOC ID location identification

MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MMR Massachusetts Military Reservation MS matrix spike MSD matrix spike duplicate

QC quality control QPP Quality Program Plan

RL reporting limit

W D relative percent difference

TB trip blank

VPH volatile petroleum hydrocarbon

Doto Summary Report for Area of Confaininofion FS-9 Massochiiserrs hlilirog~ Resentotion. Cope Cod. MA

Sepreniber ZOO2

1.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION

Environmental Chemical Corporation (ECC) collected a total of five post excavation soil samples at Fuel Spill (FS)-9 in order to verify that clean up goals had been obtained. Two samples were collected from Detail B and three samples were collected from Detail C. Samples were collected on 30 April 2001 and 1 June 2001. Samples were submitted to Mitkem in Wanvick, Rhode Island for volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) analysis, extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (EPH) analysis and Lead analysis. Quality control (QC) samples were also collected and submitted for analysis at the frequency indicated in the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) Quality Program Plan (QPP) (AFCEE 2000) and included field duplicate (FD) samples, trip blank (TB) samples, and samples collected for matrix spike (MS) analyses.

Actual sample locations and analyses are summarized in Section 2.0.

1-1

Dotn Szinimaq. Report for Area of Corrtnniinntiori FS-9 Mnssacltuserts Militng. Resentarion. Cape Cod, MA

September 2002

2.0 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Table 2-1 lists the native samples and associated field QC samples that were collected and submitted for analysis during this sampling event. Data completeness (location identifications [LOC Ids] and requested analyses) is verified against the chain-of-custody (COC) forms during the data review process. All COC forms are maintained in project files.

Table 2-1

Sample Identification Table

Sample Date MADEP MADEP Location Sample Number Type Matrix Sampled VPH EPH Lead Laboratory

09BHC7122 09BHC7122003 N1 SO 4/30/2001 X ' X X Mitkem

09BHC7123 09BHC7123003 N1 SO 4/30/2001 X Mitkem

09BHC7124 09BHC7124003 N1 so 4l3012001 X X X Mitkem

09BHC7124 09BHC7124003FD FD SO 4/30/2001 X X X Mitkem

Trip Blank 09TBC7170 TB SQ 4/30/2001 X Mitkem

09BHC7101 09BHC7101003 N1 SO 4130/2001 X X Mitkem

09BHC7102 09BHC7102003 N1 SO 4/3012001 X X Mitkem

09BHC7102 09BHC7102003FD FD SO 4/30/2001 X Mitkem

Trip Blank 09TBC7190 TB SQ 4130/2001 X Mitkem

09BHC7122 09BHC7122003 N1 SO 6/1/2001 X Mitkem

Trip Blank 09TBC3701 TB SQ 6/1/2001 X Mitkem

FD - field duplicate sample MADEP VPH - Mass DEP Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons MADEP EPH - Mass DEP Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons N1 - native sample SO - soil SQ - soil quality matrix TB - trip blank X' - Sample lost at laboratory; resampled 6/1/02

2-1

Dntn Siimmng, Report for Areo of Contamination FS-9 i2fmsarkirserrs MilitnT Resenwtion, Cope Cod, M.4

September 2002

3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES

Mitkem analyzed all samples for VPH and EPH following Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) methods. Samples collected from Detail C were also submitted for Lead analysis by contract laboratory program (CLP) method 1LM04.0. Specific analyte lists for VPH and EPH are specified in the methodology and are provided in Appendix 3­A of the MMR QPP (AFCEE 2000).

3-1

Dntn Summary Report for Aren of Contnniinntion FS-9 Mnssnclitrscrts Atilitniy Resenation. Cnpe Cod. M.4

Seppreniber 2002

4.0 DATA VALIDATION

Data validation is performed for ECC by Data Validation Services in North Creek, NY. All data are reviewed in accordance with MMR project-specific data review guidelines, defined in the MMR technical procedure Tech-055, Analytical Chemistry Data Review (AFCEE 2000). Tier I1 validation is performed for all samples included in this data set and includes evaluation of all QC procedures and laboratory data reporting forms. Confirmation of all positive results, including compound identification, and periodic checks of raw data for calculation and transcription errors are also included in the review process.

The following qualifiers are applied to the data during the review process:

U ­ The analyte was not detected at the specified detection limit. J ­ The analyte was detected, and the reported concentration is an estimated value. UJ ­ The analyte was not detected, and the non-detect value is estimated due to QC

noncompliance. R ­ The analyte value was rejected, and the result is unusable.

Method-specific qualifiers and other laboratory-specific qualifiers used to designate noncompliant values were either accepted or replaced with one of the data validation qualifiers.

4-1

Dnta Summary Report for Areo of Coiironriitorion FS-9 Mnssochirserls Militat]. Resennrioii. Cape Cod, MA

Septotiber 2002

5.0 PRECISION, ACCURACY, REPRESENTATIVENESS, COMPLETENESS AND COMPARABILITY

Data quality is assessed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability. The goals set for each of these parameters are referred to as data quality objectives (DQOs). Actual sample and QC results are compared to project DQOs to determine whether quality objectives were met for the sampling event.

5.1 PRECISION

Precision is defined as the degree to which two or more measurements are in agreement. Precision is measured by comparing duplicate sample results and is expressed as the relative percent difference (RPD) between native and field duplicate sample results and/or native and laboratory replicate sample results.

5.1.1 Field Precision

Field duplicates are collected by taking two aliquots of the same soil/sediment sample, containerizing the samples, and submitting them to the laboratory for analysis as two separate samples. The RPD criterion is 50 percent for nonaqueous samples when the concentrations in the native sample and the FD sample are greater than five times the reporting limit (RL). For duplicate results exceeding these criteria, the native sample and the FD sample are qualified as estimated (coded J), indicating possible field sampling eiror and/or possible sample nonhomogeneity.

Two FD sample pairs were collected with the soil samples, one from detail B for VPH analyses and one from Detail C for EPH, VPH and Lead analyses. The FD sample pairs submitted for VPH analysis were ND non-detect. RPD criteria were met for the FD sample pair submitted for Lead analysis. RPD values exceeded the acceptance criteria for the EPH analysis in the FD sample pair that was collected in Detail C from Location 09BHC7124; these results were qualified as estimated (coded J). The high RPD values may be attributed to the inherent difficulty in completely homogenizing solid samples. FI) results for all detected target analytes are presented in Table 5-I.

Table 5-1

Field Duplicate Precision Results for Detected Analytes

Native Duplicate Date Sample Sample

Location Analyte Sampled Result Result RL Units RPD Qualifier 09BHC7124 C19-C36Aliphatics 4/30/01 100 37 1.5 Ma/Ka 92% J 09BHC7124 Lead 4/30/01 10.5 8.9 0.1 Mg/Kg 16% -

5-1

Doto Sitnrnmt~. Report for Areo oJ Contonrinntiori FS-9 Mossncliiisefls .Afilitoq. Resenotiorl, Cope Cod, MA

September 2002

J - estimated result mg/Kg - milligrams per kilogram RL - reporting limit RPD - relative percent difference

5.1.2 Laboratory Precision

Laboratory precision is measured by the analysis matrix spikejmatrix spike duplicate (MSIMSD) samples and/or laboratory replicate samples. Precision objectives for respective analyses are listed in Appendix 3-A of the MMR QPP (AFCEE 2000) for all methods. For MS/MSD and laboratory replicate RPD values exceeding these criteria, the result in the parent sample is qualified as estimated (coded UJ or J).

The MS/MSD samples were not submitted for the analyses in this sample set. Laboratory replicate samples were analyzed for all parameters (VPH, EPH and lead) with comparable results. Qualifications were not required.

5.2 ACCURACY

Accuracy is defined as the degree to which the detected value represents the true value. Accuracy is frequently used synonymously with bias. The term bias describes the systematic or persistent error associated with a measurement process. Accuracy is assessed through the collection and analysis of blanks (field and laboratory) and other QC samples or spikes.

5.2.1 Field Accuracy

Accuracy in the field is assessed through the collection and analysis of equipment blanks (EBs) and TBs. The procedures used to collect these blanks are described in the MMR QPP (AFCEE 2000).

Contamination in blanks indicates that false positive results or results that are biased high may exist for samples associated with the affected blanks. To address this, action levels are established based on blank concentrations and compared to the sample results. During data review, sample data are qualified as non-detect (coded U) based on TB and EB results when the analyte result in the associated sample is less than five (5) times the result in the TB and EB.

EBs was not collected with this sample set because discrete samples were collected directly into sample jars. TBs were submitted with the VPH samples at the required frequency. All TBs were free of target analyte contamination; qualifications were not required.

5.2.2 Laboratory Accuracy

Accuracy in the laboratory is measured by a variety of means, including (1) sample holding times and preservation, (2) instrument calibration, (3) analysis of QC samples such as laboratory blanks, MSs, and laboratory control samples (LCSs), (4) internal standards, and (5) surrogate

5-2

Dntn Summary Report for Arm of Contnniinntiori FS-9 hlnssnclirtsetts Militor?. Rese~~~ntiori. Cope Cod. A

Septeitihcr 2003

spikes. Accuracy is quantitatively measured by calculating percent recoveries for MSs, LCSs and surrogates.

5.2.2.1 Sample Holding Times and Preservation

When samples are analyzed beyond their respective holding times or if the laboratory receives a cooler in which the temperature exceeds six degrees Celsius, positive results are suspected to be biased low and non-detect results are suspected to be false negatives. Analytical results acquired from analyses performed outside the method-specified holding times are rejected (coded R). If sample coolers are received at a temperature greater than six degrees Celsius, the results for these samples are qualified as estimated (coded J or UJ).

All samples collected as part of this sampling event met holding time and preservation requirements; qualifications were not required.

5.2.2.2 Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration parameters are reviewed for conformance to method and data review criteria according to the technical procedure MMR TECH-055, Analytical Chemistry Data Review (AFCEE 2000).

The results for the C19 - C36 aliphatic range in the EPH analysis of samples 09BHC7101003 and 09BHC7102003 were reported from an analytical batch that did not meet the continuing calibration criteria; positive and non-detect results in these samples have been qualified as estimated (coded J or UJ, respectively).

Initial and continuing calibration criteria were acceptable for the Detail C EPH, and all VPH and lead analyses; further qualifications were not required.

5.2.2.3 Laboratory Blanks

Laboratory blanks are prepared and/or analyzed along with each batch of field samples. Laboratory blanks are evaluated against there associated (same preparation andor analytical batch) field samples to determine if a laboratory condition contributed to false positives or high bias in the field samples. Associated sample data are qualified in the same maimer as field blanks.

All laboratory blanks were free of target analyte contamination; qualifications were not required.

5.2.2.4 Matrix Spikes

Accuracy objectives (as percent recoveries) for the analytes spiked into MS samples are included in the respective methods. For MS percent recoveries exceeding these criteria, the result in the parent sample is qualified as estimated (coded UJ or J). In cases where recoveries of spiked

5-3

Dora Summary Report for Awn of Conmnrittniion FS-9 dfassacliusetrs hfilirnq. Resensn/ion. Cope Cod, MA

Scprentber 2002

analytes are extremely low (less than 10 percent for organic analyses and less than 30 percent for metals), the result in the parent sample is rejected (coded R).

MS percent recoveries for all analyses were within the acceptance criteria; qualifications were not required.

5.2.2.5 Laboratory Control Samples

Accuracy objectives (as percent recoveries) for analytes spiked into LCS samples are included in the respective methods. For LCS percent recoveries exceeding these criteria, the results for the samples in the preparatiodextraction batch or the analytical batch associated with the noncompliant LCS are qualified as estimated (coded UJ or J).

It was noted during data validation that the LCS associated with the soil samples submitted for Lead analyses was prepared at a different concentration (0.5 g/50 ml) than the soil samples (1 g/50 ml). However, the laboratory replicate, matrix spike and preparation blank samples were prepared at the same level as the soil samples. All results for the QC samples were acceptable; qualifications are not required.

LCS percent recoveries for VPH and EPH analyses were within the acceptance criteria; qualifications were not required.

5.2.2.6 Surrogate Spikes

Surrogate spike compounds are added to each sample undergoing organic analyses to assess method performance and extraction efficiency. Accuracy objectives for surrogate spike compounds are listed in the respective methods. If surrogate recoveries do not meet the acceptance criteria, the sample results are qualified as estimated (coded UJ and J), indicating probable bias in the results.

Surrogate recoveries were acceptable for all VPH and EPH analyses; qualifications were not required.

5.3 REPRESENTATIVESESS

Representativeness expresses the degree to which data collected for a sample accurately and precisely represent the in situ conditions of the sample. Representativeness is a qualitative parameter that is dependent upon the proper design of the sampling program and proper laboratory protocol. Sampling plans are designed to provide data representative of the areas of investigation.

Representativeness was satisfied by ensuring that the confimiation sampling plan for FS-9 was followed, proper sampling techniques were used, proper analytical procedures and laboratory protocol were followed, and holding times of the samples were not exceeded in the laboratory.

5-4

Dntn Summary Report for Aren of Contnniinniioti FS-9 Mnssnchirsetrs Afilitnr3. ResetTniion. Cope Cod. MA

Septenrber -7002

5.4 COHLPLETEH’ESS

Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid, usable data obtained compared to the amount of data that is expected under normal conditions. Completeness can be measured in the field and in the laboratory. The goals for field and laboratory completeness are 90 percent for solid samples.

5.4.1 Field Completeness

Field completeness is a measure of the number of samples collected for a particular sampling event compared to the number of samples that were planned.

All field samples and field QC samples were collected and submitted for analysis in accordance with the MMR QPP (AFCEE 2000) and the FimI Phase I Reiitedial Actiorz Work Plan (AFCEE, May 2002).

5.4.2 Laboratory Completeness

Laboratory completeness is assessed by comparing the number of samples successfully analyzed to the number submitted, and the number of valid measurements (nonrejected results) to the number of measurements expected.

The sample collected from location 09BHC7122 on 30 April 2001 and submitted for VPH analysis was misplaced by the laboratory. This location was resampled on 1 June 2001 for VPH analysis only.

All samples submitted were successfully analyzed (100 percent completeness) and the completeness goal for valid measurements was met for all parameters, as summarized in Table 5­2.

Table 5-2

Laboratory Completeness

Analysis Percent Completeness (%) VPH 100/100 EPH 100/100

Lead 100/100

Percent completeness is expressed as the number of samples successfully analyzed compared to the number submitted, and the number of valid measurements (nonrejected results) compared to the number of measurements expected, respectively.

5-5

Dntn Summny Report for Aren of Coiitnniinntion FS-9 Mflssnchuserrs hlilitnq. Resenntion, Cnpe Cod, MA

September 200.2

5.5 COMPARABILITY

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another. For this sampling event comparability was achieved through the use of proper sampling and analytical techniques, reporting data in standard units, normalizing results to standard conditions, and by using standard reporting formats.

5-6

Datn Szinimoty Report for Aren of Confnniinntiori FS-9 Mossnchusetts Militn13. Resenofion. Cope Cod, MA

Septernber 2002

6.0 SENSITIVITY

Sensitivity is assessed by comparing the actual RLs reported by the laboratory to those specified in the MMR QPP (AFCEE 2000). However, U s may be affected by numerous factors including percent moisture of solid samples, matrix interferences, blank contamination, and sample dilutions.

RLs and sample results for the soil samples in this data set were adjusted for percent moisture following standard methodology; the percent moisture of these soil samples were all greater than 90%. Qualifications were not required.

6-1

Dntn Sunfnzot,. Reporr for Aren of Conrnnrinntion FS-9 Mnssnckriserrs Milirnry Resenation. Cope Cod, MA

Septetirber 2002

7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION AND RESOLUTION

Corrective action in the laboratory may occur before, during, and after initial analyses. Conditions such as broken sample containers or low/high pH readings of preserved samples may be identified during sample login or just before analysis. The laboratory notifies the project chemist if conditions such as these are identified; the project chemist provides the laboratory with instructions for corrective action to address these conditions.

Conditions such as the need for dilution of samples for reinjection and/or reanalysis when certain QC criteria are not met are identified by the laboratory according to its standard operating procedures, as are corrective actions for these conditions.

Any corrective actions affecting the data from this sampling event were performed before release of the data by the laboratory. Corrective actions are documented in the laboratory's corrective action files and the narrative accompanying the hard-copy data package.

7-1

Dnta Summnr). Report for Aren of Contnminntion FS-9 Mnssnchirsetts Mililnn Reseiyntion. Cope Cod, MA

September 200-1

8.0 SUMMARY

The data collected during this sampling event met the established DQOs and can be considered valid for decision-making purposes. Data for specific samples were qualified as estimated (coded J or UJ) for noncompliance with established criteria. Validated data are provided in Attachment 1.

8-1

Darn Sirmma~ Report for Aren of Contaminntion FS-9 Mossnckusetts Miilitng9 Resenxrion. Cope Cod, MA

September 2002

9.0 REFERENCES

AFCEE (Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence). 2000 (September). Quulity Progranz PIan. AFC-J23-35Q85101-M3-0002. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for AFCEEIMMR, Installation Restoration Program, Otis Air National Guard Base, MA.

AFCEE 2002 (May). Final Phase I Remedial Action Work Plan. Prepared by Environmental Chemical Corporation (ECC) for AFCEEIMMR, Installation Restoration Program, Otis Air National Guard Base, MA.

9-1

ATTACHMENT 1

Sample Results

DO 19 FS-9 Detail B

(onfii nialion Sample Results

VPH (Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mglkg

oi c ca8 0)

m c c Q (Do-

Xyi

ene <u

MT

BE

Ben

zene

Tol

uene

1>,u c-j S >,

Xo —

si Sample Sampling O 2 d> 9- o i

AOC Localion Date Sample Number Eui 9- U < UJ 2o.o <; 4/30/01 098HC7101003 5 6U 1U17U 0 83U 0 28U 083U 028U 1 UJ 0 56U 09BHC7101 17U o < 056U

FS-9Drldll 6 Condi mation 090HC7102 4130101

09BHC7102003

09BHC710iU03FO

5 i u

b5 U

I OU

13U

i 5 u

19U

0 76u

097U

0 25u

032U

0161~

0 97U

0 25u

032U

I OU

1 3U

051u

0 65U

OSIU

0 65LJ

FIELDQC 4/30/01 09TBC7190 50U 1OU 15U 025U075U 025U 075U 0 25U 1OU 05 U 0.5U

EPH (Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons), mglkg

hene

0)

nzo

fluor

anhe

ne

ate

f r

u ICS

c a>

o ni ro ra Ol c sE 0) ccaJ

ra <u 01 ra Q. o oC sQ. Al OJ a> c c ns < 0) CM" ' "

Flu

ora

ntn

c mto r (0 rO C C^ >. rooQ. at

9-C

-C1

ore ozu

o o N

O 2 S.

put ra ra ? ra cc cSample Sampling N

c ca) a. <U AOC Localion Date Saniple Number 8 o o % $ u- CN 1 ̂ raQ(J m aCO

FS-9 Detail B 09BHC7101 4/30/01 09BtiC7101003 3 2U 89 J 28.0 0 53u 0.53U 0.53U 0 53U 0 53U 0.53U 0 53U 0 53U 0 53U 0.53U 0 53U 0 53U 0 53U 05311 0 5311 05311 05311 Conflrmahon 09BHC7102 4/30/01 09BHC7102003 3.1U 4.2UJ 8.9U 052U 052U 52U 52U 52U 52U 0 52U 52U 0 52U 52U 52U 0 52U 052U052U 052U 0 52U 0 52U 052U

J = Eslimated result

mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram

U = Undelect

UJ = Eslimaled non delecl

2

I)O I9 FS-9 Detail C Con Urination Sample Results

VPH (Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons), mg/kg

OJ

Sample Samp l e AOC Location Date Sample Number si

O < C9-

C10

Aro

mat

ics

MTB

E

Ben

zene

OJ

c c 0)

O

• > ,

n. V - LU m

.p -X

yien

e

o-X

yien

e

Nap

htna

iene

o < 0UBHC7122 06/01/2001' 09BHC7122003 4 8U 0.96U 11 4U 0 72U 0.24U 0.72U 0.24U 0 9611 0 48U 0 48U

09BMC7124003 5 2U 1.0U 1 6U 0 78U 0 26U 0 78U 0 26U 1.0U 0 52U 0 52U 4/30/01 FS-9 Detail C 09BHC7124

098HC7124003FD 5.&U 1.1U 1.7U 0.83U 0.28U 0.83U 0 28U 1.1U 0.55U 0.55U Confirmation

FIELDQC 6/1/01 09TBC3701 5.0U 1.0U 1.5U 0.75U 0.25U 0.75U 0.25U 1.0U 0 5U 0 5U

FIELDQC 4/30/01 09TBC7170 5 0U 1 OU I.5U 0 75U 0 25U 0 75U 0.25U 1 OU 0 5U 0.5U

EPH (Extractable Petroleu Hydrocarb a mg/kg

11-C

22 A

rom

atic

s

F

a,c ra QJ

0J QJ QJ c

Qj9­ro c 0J a>

>, L> <IJ a) r

Flu

oran

tnen

e rc QJ Q. cQ) QJ < 0J Q c r TOr; C rV <L c ra r.0) ut c.E

r >

a> E 6 ^ QJ <

CO Oi • - ccTO i> £ a> a) ro D . o 'a a; Ifr 0)

TOQ ro

Pyr

ene 2TO oO ro cO raSample bdnpling

AOC Locallon d l e Sdrrlple Number

c >, cric 5 rs s QJ jc r QJ C l

1J)O

QJ OJ p l

0

Cl0J

ci 1 CO £15 z"O cu o CN Q_

0 48U II £ 1<

09BHC7122 4/30/01 09BtlC7122003 2 9U 940 83U 018U048U 048U 048U 0 48U 0481) 048U 048U 048U 0 48U 0 48U 0 48U 0 48U 0 48U 0 4QU 0 48U 048 U 9 Delatl C

Confirmation 090HC7124 4130101 09BHC7124003 3 OU lOO J 8 5U 0.5U 0 5U 05U05U 05 U 0 5U 0 5U 05U 0 5U 0 5U 0 5U 0 5U 0 5u 0 5u 0 5u 0 5 u 0 5 u 0 5u

09BHC7124003FD 9U 37 J 83U 0 49U 049U 049U 0 49U 0 49U 049U 04911 0 4911 0 4911 0 4911 04911 0 49U O J9U 0 4YU 049U 0 49U 049 U

Metals, (mglkg)

Sample Sampling AOC Location Dale Sample Number Pb (Lead)

09BHC7122 4/30/01 09BHC7122003 I 5 9

FS-9 Delail C 09BHC7123 4/30/01 09BHC7123003 106

Confirmation 09BHC7124 4/30/01

09BHC7124003

09BHC7124003FD

105

8 9

J ­ Estimated result

mglkg = milligrams per kilogram

U = Undetect

UJ = Estimated non detecl

* VPH Sample was spilt in Lab so resarripled in 0610112001

c

C

APPEXDIX C

BacWill Documentation

BACKFILL SOIL SAiMPLE RESULTS

AOC Basktill Stockpile Sample Location 3ori1:sP FIEL.DQ( 31HFSP FIELDQC

GRID # NA VA NA N-\

Sampling Date .lDt3P RCS-I 5 15 01 1501 11 1.01 1 1/1:01

Sample Vumbcr '".? £.? ?OBFSl1901 BFSPTB01 trio blank ?OBFSl1901 BFSPTB02 tnp blank

Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH), mg/kg

C's-i's .-\llDflaLlCS IO0 \: U i ; U

(-9-C!2 .-\llphatlcs 1.000 u U U U

C9-CI0 Aromatics 1.000 [J u u , u .V1TBE 0 u u u u

Benzene 10 u u Ll u Toluene 90 u u u u

EthqIbenzene 80 u u u u ino-Xvlene 500 u u IJ u

o-Xylene 500 u u u u Naphthalene 4 u u u L1

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) mg/kg C9-C18 Alphatics 1,000 5.10 NA V NA

C19-C36 Aliphatics 2.500 i; NA V NA CI1-C22 Aromatics 200 u NA L" NA

Acenaphthene 20 II NA u NA Acenaphthylene 100 u NA u NA

Anthracene 1,000 u NA u NA Benzol a lanthracene 0.70 u NA u NA

Benzol a Ipyrene 0.70 u NA u NA Benzol b)tluoranthene 0.70 u NA u NA Benzol ghOperylene 1,000 u NA u NA

Benzol klfluoranlhene 7.00 \j NA u NA

Chrysene 7.00 u NA IJ NA

Dibenzoi a.h (anthracene 0.70 u NA V NA

Fluoranthene !$000 L; NA L.1 NA

Fluorene 100 u NA u NA

Indcno( 1.2.I-cd)pyrmc 0.70 L: NA u NA

Laphthalene 4 u NA u NA

Phenanthrene 100 u NA LI NA

Pyrene 700 LI NA u NA

2-~ieth~lnaphthalate 4 II NA 1! NA

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) mg/kg .Arc)clor 1016 2 u NA U NA

Arocior I22I 2 u ><A Li NA

.\roc!or 1232 2 u NA U NA

Aruclor I212 2 u NA ( j NA

Aroclor 1248 2 u NA U NA

Aroclor 1254 2 u NA i; NA

\roclor I360 2 V. NA u NA

Appendix C-v3.?rls Page 1 of 6

BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

AOC Backfill Stockpile Sample 1.ocation 30Bf:SP FIELDQ( 30DFSP FIELDQC

GRID # NA NA NA NA

Sampling Date .1DEP RC.Y-/ 5-1501 5 15 01 1I.1 01 11:I 01

Sample Sumber mg kg 30BFSP00I BFSPTBOI :rip blank 30BFSPOO2 BFSPTBO? tnp blank

Metals, mg/kg

Al (.Aluminum) hRL 2.OI10 NA 1210 NA

Sb (Antimony) 10 0.20 J NA U NA

As (Arsenic) 30 1.3 J NA 1.2 NA

Ba (Banum) 1.000 S.80 NA 7.5 NA

Be iBcryllium) 0.70 0I4J NA 0.15 J NA

Cd (Cadmium) 30 1 I 0 NA U NA

(-a rCalcium) NRI 208 VA I49 NA

Cr (Chromium) 1,000 3.3 J u A 2.S NA

Co ~Cubalt) 500 I5 0 q A i.I NA

Cu (Copper) 1,000 3.20 NA 5.S NA

Fe (Iron) NRL 3.300 NA 3630 NA

Pb I Lead) 300 7.50 NA 1.6 NA

Mg (Magnesium) NRL 623 N'A 507 NA

Mn (Manganese i NRL 62.')0 MA 69.8 NA

Hg (Mercury) 20 U MA V NA

Ni (Nickel 300 1.9 J MA 2.1 NA

K (Potassium) NRL 2<r NA 293 NA

Se (Selenium) 400 1.9 J NA L: NA

Ag (Silver) 100 0 069 J NA U NA

Na (Sodium) NRL 27.5 J NA V NA

Th (Thallium) 8 U NA u NA

V (Vanadium) 400 S.10 NA 5.1 NA

Zn (Zinc) 2,500 12 NA 7 7 NA

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), mg/kg

Dichloroditluoromethane . 1.000 U U Li U

Chloromethane 0.10 U U U u Vinyl Chloride 0.30 U U U u Bromomethane 3 U I.' u u Chloroethane 100 u u u u

Tnchlorofluoromethane 1,000 i ; u u u 1.1-Dichlroethane 3 u u u u

Acetone 3 0.03 u 0.014 u lodomethane 100 u i : U u

Carbon Disulfide 100 u u U u Methylene Chloride 0.10 u u U u

trans-I.2-Dichloroethene 4 u [J u u MTBE 0.30 u u u u

I.l-Dichloroethane 3 u u V u Vinvl acetate 1,000 u u i; u

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 2 u u u u 2.2-Dichloruorouane NRL u u u u

Appendix C_v3.xls Pace 2 of 6

BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE: RESULTS

Backfill Stockpile Sample Location !OBFSP FIEI.UQC 30BFSP FIELDQC

GRIDt NA YA NA NA

Sampling Date .IDEP RCS-I 5.1501 5:15 01 II I 01 I 1 1 01

Sample \umber mgikg 30BFSP001 BISPTBOI trip blank 3OBISP002 BFSP-TUOZ trip blank

2-Butanonc I).?0 .001 J U ta u Bromochloro methane N h C U i; u

C'hloroform 0.10 1/ U U u 1.1.1- rnchloroethane 10 V u u u 1.1 -Dichloropropene NRL u u u .\ u Carbon .Tetrachloride I u u u

! 2-Dichloroethane 0.05 i: !J u u Benzene 10 u u u

rrichloroerhylene 0.40 u u u I .'-Dichioropropane 0.10 u u u

Dibromomethane 500 u ' I u u Bromodichloro methane 0.10 u J u u cis-l .?-Dichloropropene 0.01 U j u u 4-~lethvl-2-pentanonr 1 u '.J u u

Toluene 90 002 J J u u trans-I. i-Dichloropropene 0.01 U -j L- u

1.1.2 -Tnchloroethane 030 U J u u 1.3-Dichloropropane 0.01 U J u u Tetrachloroethylene 1 U ] 1 u u

2-Hexanone 100 0007 Ij u u Dibromochloromethane 0 0 9 u IJ u u

1.2-Dibromoethanr 001 V {] u u Chlorobenzene 8 u u u u

1.I.I 2-Tetrachloroethane 0.10 Lr IJ u u Erhvlbenzene 80 U i-i u u

Styrene 1 U IJ u u Total Xylene 500 [J IJ u u Bromoform 0.10 u Ij u u

IsouroDvlbenzene NRL u Ij u u I .I.2. 2-Tetrachloroerhanr 002 i; I ' I; u

Bromobenzene 100 u IJ u u 1.-.i-Trichloropropene NRL u IJ u u

n-Prop!lbenzene IO0 i, IJ I-' u 2-Chlorotoluenr Ino \; IJ L' u

I .i.5--Trimethvlbrnzene 10 u I! 1I u i-('hlororoluene I00 u lJ u u

tert-But?lbenzene 100 u lJ u u 1.2.~-Trimrth~lbrnzenc 1.000 u I1 u u

xc-But>lbenzenr NRI. u I.I u u 1.?-Dichlorobenzene Iu0 u IJ u u 4-lsopropyltoluenr NRL u IJ u u I .-LDichlorobenrene 2 u IJ u u

Appendix C-v3.xls Page 3 of 6

BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

AOC Backfill Stockpile Sample Location ZOl3FSP FIELDQC 3UDFSP FIELDQC

GRIDif NA uA NA NA

Sampling Date tlDEP RCT-I 5 l 5 ql ::15,OI 1: I01 ; I 1 0 1

Sample Sumber mg kg 30BFSP001 DFSPTWI tnD blank ,-OBFSPOO: BFSPTBO: tnp blank

n-Butylbenzene NRL i; U u U

1.2-Dichlorobenzene 100 i; u u U

! .2-Dibromo-.'-chloropropane 10 t; u u U

! .2.4- frichlorobenzene 100 i; u (.; U

Hexachlorobutadiene 3 U u u . V

Naphthalene 4 ! . • u V u 1.2.5-Tnchlorobenzene 100 U u V u

Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) (ug/kg) Phenol 60 i; NA u NA

Sis(Z-Chloroethyl)Ether 0 . : u NA V NA

'-Chlorophenol 0 . : l~i S A Ij NA

!.3-Dichlorobenzene 100 i; . A L1 NA

i.I-Dichlorobenzene T I' NA U NA

I .'-Dichlorobenzene I00 {• NA u NA

2-41eth\l phenol 500 {, NA u NA

2.2'-ox> bis( 1-Chloropropane) 0.7 i; NA u NA

I-Methyl phenol 500 i • NA u NA

N-Nitroso-di-n-prop~lamine 50 \j \ A u NA

Hexachloroethane 6 u NA u NA

Nitrobenzene 500 u NA u NA

Isophorone 100 L: NA u NA

:-Nitrophenol 100 I' NA u NA

'.-!-Dimethyl phenol 0.7 L' NA u NA

2,I-Dichlorophenol !0 V NA u NA

1.'.J-l.richlorobenzene 100 I! YA u NA

Kaphthalene 4 L: NA u NA

4-Chloroaniline NRL r NA u NA

bis( 2-Chloroethoxy (methane 500 i; NA u NA

ieuachlorobutadiene 3 I ' NA u u A

I-C'hloro-?-Xlethyl phenol !00 i1 NA u NA

2-Xlrthblnaphthalene 4 I NA u NA

fieuachloroc~clouentadiene 50 L" NA 1I NA

'.l.cl-Trichlorophenol r N.\ ( • N ' \

7.4.5-rrichlorophenol L NA u NA

I-C'hl~~ronaphthalene I O00 i; NX u NA

2-Sitroaniline NRL c NA u NA

Dimrthylohthalate NRL u NA u NA

\cenaohthvlene 100 u NA u NA

?.h-Dinitrotoluene 100 w NA u NA

1-Yitroaniline NRL. u NA u NA

Acenaphthene 20 L- NA u NA

2.I-I>initroohenol 3 U NI\ u NA

Appendix C_v3.xls Page 4 of 6

BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

AOC" Backtill Stockpile Sample I.ocation >OBFSP F1ELDQ(- 30UFSP FIELDQC

(;RIDt N:\ N'A NA NA

Sampling Date lLlDEP R(S/ 5.15 I 5 1501 I I !,lJl 1i .1.91

Sample \umber mg/kg 30BFSP001 BFSPTB01 inp blank 3OBF.SPOO2 BFSPTB02 tnp blank

l-\itrophenol IO0 U . A i; u A

Dihenrut'uran 100 u VA U VA

2.l-Uin11rotoluene 0.7 u \.A U \ A

Dierh?iphrhaiate 0.7 I1 NA u NA

I-C'hiorophrnyl phenylether NRL u NRL u NRL

Fluorene 400 u NA u NA

4-Nitroaniline NRL u NA u NA

1.6-Dinirro-2-meth~lphenoi I00 u IJA u NA

N-~itrosodipnenvlamine ;oo u ?4A u NA

&Bromophenyl phenylether \R L u YA u UA

Heuachloro brnzene 0.7 u . A u NA

Prntachlorophenol u S A u NA

Phenanthrene 100 u NA u NA

Anthracene I000 Ij YA u NA

C~rbazole NRL L' YA u NA

Ui-n-bur)lphthaiate 100 u NA u YA

Fluoranthene io00 u NA u \ A

Pkrene 700 u NA u NA

Butylbenzylphthalate 100 u NA u NA

Z.3'-Dich1orobenzid:ne I t; NA u NA

Benzo( a )anthracene 0.7 u NA u NA

Chrysene 7 u ?JA u NA

b:s(3-Eth~lhz~yl)phthalate I00 u NA u NA

DI-n-octylphthalate io00 u NA u NA

Brnzo( bitluoranthene 0.7 u NA u NA

Benzo( k)tluoranthrne 7 u PIA u NA

Renzo(a)pvrene 0.7 u NA u NA

Indrnoi I .?.?-cd)pqrene 0.7 u NA u NA

Dihrnzo(a.h )anthracene 0.7 u YA u NA

Brnzucg.h.1)perylenc 1000 I; . A u NA

Pesticides, mg/kg

alpha-BH(' 50 NA NA u NA

iicta-BHC 50 NA NA u NA

delta-BHC 10 NA NA u NA

gamma-BHC 10 NA NA u NA

lleptachlor 0.10 NA NA 0.003 NA

Aldnn 0.03 NA NA u NA

Heptachlor epoxide 0.06 NA NA u NA

Endosull'an I 0.05 NA NA u NA

Dieldrin 0.03 NA NA u NA

4.4'-DDE 2.00 NA NA u NA

Endnn 0.60 NA NA L: NA

Appendix C-v3.xls Page 5 of 6

BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

AOC Backfill Stockpile

Sample Location 30BFSP FIEILDQC 3OBFSP FIELDQC

GRID# NA NA NA NA

Sampling Date .M4DEPRCS-I j ; l5.01 5, 1501 11/1:01 1 1/1.0!

Sample Number m%/kg 30BFSPOO1 UFSPTBOI tnp blank 3OBFSPOOZ BFSPTBO? trip blank

Endosulfan II 0.05 NA NA U NA

-+'-DDD 200 Nh VA 002 J NA

Endosulfan sulfate 005 NA uA U NA

l.l '-DDT Z00 NA NA i; NA

Methoxychlor 30 NA NA u NA

Endnn ketone NRL NA NA u NA

Endnn aldehyde 10 NA NA u UA

alpha-Chlordane 1 NA NA 0.0 UA

gamma Chlordane 1 NA uA 00084 YA

Toxauhenr !00 NA \ A U NA

J - Estimated result

mgikg - milligrams per kilogram

NA - Not Analyzed

NRL - No Regulatov Limit

U - Undetect

UJ - Estimated non detect

Appendix C-v3.xls Page 6 of 6

APPENDIX D

Soil Stockpile Sample Data and

Massachusetts Landfill Reuse Levels

CSA STOCKPILE SOII, DATA

'I'PII, PCBs, hlETAL,S and CONDUCTIVITY

A(K C'SA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS0I1 30SOS0U 30SOS011 30SOS011 30SOS012 30SOS012 30SOS0I2 30SOSOI2

(.UIDtf M.WI-P I'OIM IOIM TOPI i on TOP2 TOP2 TOP2 TOP2

Sampling Date landfill ll.'5'O] 11/5/01 11/5'01 11/5/01 1 1/5/01 1 1/5/01 11/5/01 1 1 /5/01

Sample Number Rcsn\c (lifi'iia nig kit 30SOS011005 30SOS011010 30SOSOI1015 30SOS011020 30SOS012005 30SOS012010 30SOS0120I5 30SOS012020

Total Petroleum Uydrocarhons (ing/kg) Diesel Range Oiganics 5,000 1 1 .1 4X 11 | 2') 150 4.3 .1 U 4.4.1

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (mg/kg) Aroclor 1016 2 -Total I'CBs 11 II U (J U U U U

Aroclor 1221 u U U U U IJ Uu Aroclor 1232 (I tl II U U U IJ u Aiocloi 1242 II II 11 u U (I (I II

Aioeliii 1 24R u U u u U 1) I) II

Aiocloi 1254 u U 0.08 u U 1) u U

Aroclor 1260 0.33 0.041 0.072 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.014 0.05

Metals (mg/kg) Arsenic 40 2.4 3.4 4.4 I.6 2.3 4.3 I .o J 2 4

Cadmium K0 0.3d .1 0.34 .1 0 27 J 0.13J 0.30 J 1.2 0 I I 0022 .I

C hiomium I.OOIl I 0 4 I25 8.3 6.7 I75 22.4 5.9 8.6

I ?;Id 2.110 200 07.5 20.4 20.7 95.4 Iox 50.4 3 2 0

Meicui v IO I 0 0.3 0.52 0.11 4 3 0.30 II U

Conductivity (iimhos/cnt) Conductiv it> K.000 129.40 74.37 4K42 66.0K 61.30 ll>.55 22.95 25.25

.1 - estiniated \;tlue ingikg - mi11igratii.'k1Ivgrani U - not detected umhosicm - niicmlinis!centimeter

Appendix I) v3.xls 1 of 4

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

TPII, PCBs, METALS and CONDUCTIVITY CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample location 30SOSOI3 30SOS01 3 30SOS013 30SOS013 30SOSOI3 30SOS014 30SOS0I 4 30SOSOI4

(,KII)# A / . f / W IO1M IOIM I()l'3 TOI'3 I()1'3 TOI'4 TOI'4 TOI'4

Sampling Date landfill 1 1 •5/01 1 l '5/01 1 1'5/()1 1 1/5/01 11/5/01 1 1/5/0i 1l'5/01 1 1/5/01

Sample Nuinhcr Ri'^usf ( lilrriii ing'kg 'OSOSO 1.1005 30SOSOI3010 3OSOSO13O1OI:I) 3OS0S0130I5 30S0S013020 30SOSOI4005 30SOS014010 30SOSOI40I5

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ni)>/k}>)

Diesel Range Organic* 5,000 150 7.7.1 6.3 J 14 51 22 72 4.6 .1

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (ing/kg)

Aroclor 1016 2 Total IVHs 11 U U U U U 1) 11

Aroclor 1221 I! 1) V u U II II U

Aiocloi 1232 IJ 11 \i u IJ II U U

Aiocloi 1242 11 11 U u IJ U u IJ

Aroclor 1248 U 11 U 11 II II u | i

Aroclor 1254 11 (1 U u U 1) 50 U

Aiocloi I2()O 0.0X5 0.024 0.026 0.22 0.073 0.14 0.036 U

Metals (ing/kg)

Aisctiic 41) 2.') ?.I 3.I 2.7 2.5 3.0 2.6 3 5

Cadmium X0 0.69 0.15.1 0.16 .1 0.12.I n040 .I 0.30 J 0.2h .I I1

( hromuim 1.000 IX.X 10.3 10.4 16.4 7.4 12.0 10.8 8.4

1 cad 2.000 156 31.0 27.6 48.3 31.1 148 45.2 11.2

McHU!) 10 4 i 0.63 1.6 ().0')5 U 2.4 2.8 0.05

Conductivity (umhos/cm)

CoiuluctiviU X.000 1 24 .11 73.13 118.53 61.86 42.85 <)5.O8 54(10 46.27

J - estimated value mgikg - niilligrani/kilogram U - not detected umhos/cm - microhms/centimeter

Appendix I) v3.xls 2 of 4

C'SA S'I'OCKPII,E SO11, DATA

TPII, PCRs, METALS and CONDUCTIVITY

A(K ('SA Stockpile ('SA Stockpilc ('SA Stockpile ('SA Stochpile ('SA Slockpilc ('SA Stockpile ('SA Slockpilc ('SA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS014 30SOS015 30SOS0I5 30SOSOI5 30SOS015 30SOS016 30SOS0I6 30SOSOI6

( ,RII)« ,u.i/>/•:/' K>|'4 roi'.s 1OP5 TOPS TOP5 RAMI'I KAMPI RAMPI

Sampling Dale l.aiulfill 11/5/01 1 1 '5/01 1 1 /.V<> 1 11/5/01 1 1/5/01 11/5/01 1 1 .'5/01 1 1/5/01

Sample N'mnhrr ftrw/w ( rilctia ing kg 30SOS014020 30S0S015005 3OS0S015O1O 10SOSOI5015 10SOS01S020 30SOS016005 <OS()SO16OO5II) WSOSOIOOIO

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg/kg) Diesel R a n g e ( ) i p a n i c s 5,000 201) 13 4 4.1 1 1 22 1 1 0.0 J 6.3 .1

Polychlorinated Riphcnyls (nig/Tig)

A r o c l o r l O l d 2 -Total P( Bs II [| 11 U 11 U II U

A r o d or 1221 11 11 U U U 11 11 11

A i o e l o r 1232 1) II U U 11 1! u Aioc lo t 1242 I! I' 11 11 1! U II u A r o d o r 124X ! 1 U V I.I 1! U U u Aioc lo t 1254 11 II I! 11 I! 11 II 1!

A r o c l o r 12M) 0.07 0.13 0.028 0.077 0.051 0.02X 0.02') 0.34

Metals (mg/kg)

Arwiiic 40 2.X IX I.o 2.4 1 7 25 2.7 25

I admiuin xo I1 0.036 .1 ( J025 I 0.09 J 0.08I .I 0.1 S J 0 046 .1 O,f)L8 .!

Chromium I .ooo X.X 7 0 4 8 8.0 1.3 10.I X.{) 7 4

1 end 2.000 348 25.4 2 1 0 40 . 0 31.7 43.0 2 1 8 22.0

Mercury 1c 0 35 0 13 11 U 0.02x .I 2.4 I.(I O.O(I

Conductivity (umhos/cm)

('onductivitv X.000 33.05 31.054 42.XV 54.36 65.27 05.5 1 0<).40 48.X0

J - estimated value nigikg - niilligram/kilograi U - not detected unilios!cm - niicrolinisicentinieter

Appendix I) v3.xls 3 of 4

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

TPII, PCBs, META1,S and CONDUC'TIVITY

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample location 30SOS0I6 30SOS017 30SOS017 30SOS018 II I- I .DQC

( ; K I I > # MADEP RAMIM RAMP2 RAMI'2 RAMI'3 NA

S:Impliiiti Dale Landfill 11/5/01 1 1/5/01 11/5/01 11 /5/01 1 1/5/01

Sample Number llcsnsc ('rilcrid mi; kg 30SOSOI60I5 30S0S017005 3OSOSO17OIO 30S0S018005 30RBS0I 1

Total Petroleum Ilydiocaibons (mg/kg) Diesel Range Oifjanics 5,000 2. ̂ .1 200 6.X .1 76 I I

Polychlorinatcd Biplicnyls (mg/kg) Aroclor ll)l() 2 - lo'.al I'CBs U U (I U I I

Aroclor 1221 u I) u U 1)

Aroclor 1 232 u U u U U

At odor 1242 u 11 u U u Aroclor 1248 u I I u U t l

Aroclor 1254 u 65 u U 11

Aroclor 1 2(>0 u 0.044 0.1 0.029 11

Metals (mg/kg) Aiscnic 40 4.2 2.8 4.0 2.1 w

Cadmium 80 u 0.23 .1 0.87 0.072 .1 u Chromium 1,000 13.0 13.6 18.5 9.9 I!

1 cad 2.000 16.2 61.1 118 48.7 1.7.1

Mercury 11! 0.034 .! 3.0 0.033 J 3.7 l i

Conductivity (iimlios/cin) l ~ l ~ l c t l \ I l y | 8.C100 34.h(l 227.04 32.91 85.99 NA

.I - estimated \.slue nig'kg ­ niillig~ani.'kilograni U - not detected uiiihos!cni ­ microlims/centinictcr

Appendix D v3.xls 4 of 4

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s AO C CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS011 30SOS011 30SOS011 30SOS011 30SOS012 30SOS012

GRID# TOPI TOPI TOPI TOPI TOP2 TOP2

Sampling Date 1 1 5'01 11/5/01 11 5/01 11/5/01 11-5 01 11-5,01

Sample Number 30S0S011005 30S0S011010 30S0S01.015 30S0S011020 30SOS012005 30SOSOI2010

Benzaldehvde i; L' U U V 1!

Phenol V U U U I' Li

bis(2-Chloroethyi )Lther V Li U L> L: I.'

2-Chlorophenol V U U U u U

2-Methyl phenol V V U U V U

2,2'-oxybis(l -Chloropropane) V u U u V u Acetophenone V u u V V u

4-Methyl phenol 45.1 35.1 V V i" u N-Nitroso-di-n-prop> lamine u U Li u c u

Hexachloroethane u U LI u 'u u Nitrobenzene u U i; u L; u Isophorone u L! u u u L1

2-Nitrophenol u LI u Li u u 2,4-Dimethyl phenol u U I" V L;

LI

Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane I' U L: V L: U

Naphthalene l i U L1 u I: U

4-Chloroaniline r LT L; V i" U

Hexachlorobutadienc u U V u L U

Caprolactam i' U V L 1' u 4-Chloro-3-Methyi phenol V L! V L1 L' L;

2-Methylnaphthalene u V V Li I Li

Hexachlorocyclopentadienc L u V U 1/ . U

2,4.h-Tnchiorophenoi I V V V L V

2.4.5-Tnchlorophenol {' V 1/ l i L V

l.i'-Biphenvl I I: ( i 1^ • L' V

2-Chloronaphlhaienc i : L' L: ! I ' i ;

2-Nitroaniline i Li i" r r r Dimethylphthalak­ i U r L' L' L!

2.0-Dinitrotoluene i: L' i ' V L r Acenaphthyiene r V 32.1 V 31J u 3-Nitroaniime V V Li V i '

Acenaphthene V V 25J 30.' r Li

"2.4-Dimtrophenoi r I.1 V L1 r 4-Nitrophenol i i : r (' r r

2.4-Dmitroto!u'jne V V i : I" L'

Dibenzol'uran c u 3().l l i r I1

Diethylphthalait r i ; {• I r I1

4-Chlorophen\l phen>k'thei i : i 1 \: I' r I '

Fluorenc r i; }{>! 50J i 27.1

4-Nrtroanibne r L' ['* r i i:

4.6-Dinitro-2-mcth\ Iphenol i : i : I ' L: r V

N-Nitrosodiphenvlanuni.1 i1 r r L li

Appendix D_v3.xls oi'10

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

SVOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile ('SA Stockpile CS A Stockpile (SA Stockpile ('SA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location : 0 s o s 0 I 3OSOSOI1 30SOS911 3OSOS0I1 :osos0I 2 30SOS012

GRID# TOPI TOPI TOP1 TOP1 1OP1 TOP2

Sampling Date 11/5/01 I 1.5,OI 11/5/01 I1'5'01 11 5 .01 11 5,01

Sample Sumber 30S0S011005 3USOSU11010 3OSOS01IC 15 30SOSO II020 3[3SOSO I2005 3USOSOI2(11

4-Bromophenyl phenylether U U U L U V

Haacilorohenzrnr U U U V I ' V

Atrazins u V U L' U V

Pentachlorophenol u U L' L' U u Phenanthrene u U 410 420 2301 350

Anthracene u 80.1 53s 1101 561 100s

Carbazole u u 391 29J U 64J

Di-n-butylphthalate 31.1 421 25.1 V 401 333

FIuoranthene 510 210s 900 7(IO 760 1700

Pyrene 310 1(IO1 820 720 460 1300

Butvlbenzylphthalate U U U U Uu 3,3'-Dichlorohenzidine i: Vu V u V

bis(2-Ethylhesyl iphthalatc 180.1 410 290J 6(>0J 120.1 150J

Benzol a )anthracene 220 s 941 370 380 270.1 780

Chrysene 260.1 1501 110 4oii 300J 770

Di-n-ochlphthalate V 70.1 V 345 I1

Benzo(h)fluoranthenc 320.1 160J 410 390 31OJ 940

Benzo(k)fluoranthem 931 V 190.1 130.1 1 I O! 400 )

Benzo(alpvrene ! QOJ 781 310.1 310.1 2001 610

Indene( 1.2.3-cd ~pyrenc 120s h(>1 170.1 I 70.1 120.1 390.1

Dibenzo(a.h )anthracrnr 4o.l U 5b1 r 38J 100.1

Benzocg.h.i )Dcrvlene 140.: 7(>J 2201 21OJ 1:o.r 44Ci

TOT.4L SVOCs ug%g 2569 15-31 4815 4814 3185 8253 TOTAL SVOCs mg kg 2.6 1.s 4.8 4.5 8.3 MADEP REC'SE LIMIT TOTAL SVOCS (mgkg) 100 100 ;00 100 100 100

Appendix D_v3.xls 2 of 10

J ­ estimated i.alue mgj'kig - milligram kilogram U ­ not detected ug'kig ­ microgram kilogram

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

SVOCs

AOC C'S4 Srochpilc CSA Strickpile (SA Stockpile CSA Strickpile CSA StocLpile CS.4 Stockpiie

Samplc Location 30SOS012 ?OSOS!II2 30SOSOI.: 30SOS013 30soso13 3OSOSOI3

GRID# TOP2 TOP2 TOP.? TOP? TOP.? TOP'

Sampling Date 11 5 01 lis5 01 11 '5.01 11,5'0l 115 0i 11 '501

Samplc Kumhcr 3OSOSO17(115 ?OSC)S0:7020 ?OSOS01XKt5 3JSOSO13010 30SOSOINIOFD ?OSCSOI3015

Benzaldehyde i; U 0S.I [/ L" u Phenol U U i : r I' u

bis(2-Chloroeth!1Itthe: U U I; u I; L'

2-Chiorophenol u u u l i II u 2-Methyl phenol I.I u u U U I:

Z.Z'-oxvbis(I-Chloru-sruuanei u II u V I' U

Acetophenon? V u V V V l^;

4-Methyl phenol U u 100.1 V u I 001

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamin~ u u u u LI u Hexachloroe!hane V u V I' u

Vitrobenzene u LI u U u u Isouhorone C! U u u 1; u

2-Nitrophenol V U V L: L u 2.4-Dimethyi phenol V u V U L1 u

Bis (2-chloroethoxy i methane V u u L Ii u Naphthalene i : u 605 I' L: 50.r

4-Chloroaniirne U I! u Li U U

Hexachlorohuradiene u u V I ' u L:

Caprolaetam u r 19.1 L- u u I-Chioro-3-Meth!i phentl' U V I' r L.

Z-Methllnaphrnalene r h 741 L­ 4 i .i 81.1

HexachlorocyciopentadIenr u V C r L.

2.1.6-Trichlor~phcnol 1: u V r r r 2.3,5-Trichlorophrnr~! L' I • i; L L' i:

I.l'-Riphen>l V u t: r V L:

2-C'hloronaphthaicne V 1; L" u {­ L;

2-Yitroaniline V I! r L' {' I '

1)imetiivinhihalat~ T i V u 1 V V

2.6-Dinitrololuene r u r L' V I'

Acenaphthviene i i: l)4.l 46.1 '«.! C

3-Nitroanilme ( . • {' u V V L:

Acenaphthene r i 3d.l I' 56J V

2/4-Dinilropncmi! r r. I r 1:

4-Nitrophenol i r r r i r 2.4-ninitroloiuetif V r V {' r r

Dibenzolura? V r ...<<I V i : 3"J

Diethyiphrhalarc {• r r r r L"

-l-Chiorophen> I p!icii>I~.ihei I r I r i: i:

Fluorrnc r \ 541 3 1J ! 1 0.l 39J

1-Sirroanilini. r r r l : r r 4.6-Dinitro-2-meth> Inheno' u i: L' 1 L' u

N-Nitrosodiphem lamine r r r i • r r

Appendix D-i.3.sIs ? of 10

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

SVOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile CSA Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS012 30sos012 30sos01:; 30SOSOI3 i0SOS0I3 30SOS0I 3

GRIDP TOP: TOP? TOP7 TOP3 TOP' T O P '

Sampling Date 11.501 II'YO1 11 '5.'01 11;5:01 1l!501 115 '0 1

Sample Vumber 30SOS(!1201.i 30SOSO12020 ?OSOS013005 30S0S013010 30SOSOl30lOFD 30S0S013015

4-Bromophenll phen!ltrthr; I' V U I.i U U

Hexachlorobenzcne 1' V U u U i;

Atrazine u V U u I! V

Pentachlorophenol u U U u U V

Phenanthrene u v 490 u 930 34UJ

Anthracene u v 140J 53J 180s 52.1

Carbazole L' U 625 U 883 415

Di-n-butylphthalate u u 511 u 353 2IJ

F1uoranthene 23J 23s 1600 530 2000 510

Pyrenr i; U 1500 470 Iboo 400

Butylbenzylphthalate L V 271 U Li 360

?.3'-Dichlorobenzidine U V i ; U U U

bis(2-Eth!lhexvl )phthalatc. 200J 120J 2901 1503 30(lJ 110J

Benzo(a)anthracene L1 U 860 2403 760 210.1

Chrysene c L! 970 2805 910 240J

Di-n-octylphthalate 28J 1; 47.1 1i U V

Benzo(b)fluoranthene T U 1200 2803 970 260.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene i: L! 450 120s 380 1103

BenzoiaJpyXne U L' 710 1903 610 I701

Indene( 1.2.3-cd p y n e L i: 3301 9Is 270J 7̂ .1

Dibenzoi a.h janthracenc I r 36J r 32.1 U

Benzo(g. h.1 rpen4ene r i_ ?30J 9.-".i 290.1 90.I

TOTAL SVOCS ug/Tcg 251 143 9333 2536 8160 9661 TOTAL S\'OCs mg'kg 0.3 0.1 0.3 2 s 8.2 9.7 MADEP REC'SE LI.kfIT TOTAL S\'OCS (mgp'kg) 100 100 100 100 100 100

Appendix D_v3.xls 4 of 10

J - estimated value mg,'kg - mil1igranil;ilograni U - not detected ug.'kg - microgram 'kilo,("n

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS013 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS015

GRIDS TOP3 TOP4 TOP4 TOP4 TOP4 TOP5

Sampling Date 11/5/01 11-5/01 11/5/01 n'5-oi 11'5'01 11/5-01

Sample Number 3OSOSO13O2O 30SOS014005 30SOS014(ilO 30SOS014015 30SOS014020 3OS0S015005

Benzaldehyde U 100.1 240 .1 U 34 J L; Phenol U 42.1 LI U LI u

bis(2-Chloroethyl lEther U U I! L: V u 2-Chlorophenol U U U u u u 2-Methyl pheno! V u L." U Li Li

2,2'-oxybis(l -Chioropropane) U V U U V U

Acetophenone u u I! u U u 4-Methyl phenol 34 J 95.1 U u U u

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine U U U u L" L1

Hexachloroethane U U U L; U L;

Nitrobenzene U U U LI U u lsophorone U U u U U u

2-Nitrophenol U V u V u u 2,4-Dimethyi phenol V i ; u U LI u

Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane V. u u u U I!

Naphthaiene I c u u u V

4-Chloroaniline V u h Li u u Hexachlorobutadienr V V i: V u I.

Caprolactam V u u U V. L:

4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol V I; I: u I: I 2-Mc!hylnaphrhalene V 1; u V I' V.

Hexachlorocyclopenradienc V M Li V V V

'.4.(i-Trichiorophcnni V V< V V V u 7.4.5-Trichloraphrnol V U V u V L!

l.l'-Biphenyl V I.1 1/ LI V L'

'-Chiormaphihaiene V I i: V V L

?-Nitroaniline u 1 u u I'

Dimethylphihalare L r L: u L" V

2.h-Dinitroroiiieiic I1 I L i : u u r\cenaphth!len; 1/ 02 J L: 84 J 14067 L"

3-Uitroaniline Li I' V U U I'

Acenaphthene L1 43 J V L1 75.1 I"

2.4-Dinitrophenol V V I V I ' r 4-Nitrophenoi V r V V Li Li

2.4-Dinitrotoluene V u V 11 i:

Dibenzoluran V 35 J r 1: 35 .! V

Diethyiphthalarc I. r u L' r V

4-Chlorophenyl phein lether V V V i : LI L

Fluorene V 54 _I V 54 ! 1l(1_ I r 4-Nitroaniline I' I­ u i: LI r

4.6-Dinitro-2-mcth!lpheiial L1 V V I-1 Ii r N-Nitrosodiphen? lamine l : V I bU J V I' L'

.4ppendix D-\-?.xls 5 of IO

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS013 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS014 30SOS015

GRID# TOP3 TOP4 TOP4 TOP4 TOP4 TOPS

Sampling Date 11/5/01 11 5/01 1T5/01 11.5/01 1T501 1 1 '5/01

Sample Number 3OSOSO13020 30SOS014005 30SOS014010 30SOS014015 30SOS014020 30SOSO15005

4-Bromophenyl phenylether f U V V U L"

Hexachlorobenzene U Li V V U 1:

Arrazinc U U V I) L;

Pentachlorophenol U U u U U u Phenanthrene 110 J 490 33 J 470 590 150J

Anthracene u 110.1 V 78.1 210.1 27.1

Carbazole u 60 J u U 52 J U

Di-n-butylphthalate u U 23 .1 U U u Fluoranthene 170 J 1100 60 J 550 1200 210J

Pyrene 200 J 910 66 J 670 1200 190.1

Butylbenzylphthalate U 42 J L' U U U

3.3'-Dichlorobenzidme U U U U U U

bis(2-Ethylhexyl iphthalate 470 270 .1 290 J 230.1 240.1 380

Benzo(a)anthracene % J 470 56 J 310 J 590 100J

Chrysene 150 J 570 70 J 380 670 110J

Di-n-octylphthalate U V U U U V

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 130 J 560 U 270 J 570 130J

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 62.1 300 J L1 150 J 280 J 48J

Benzol a)pyrene 74.1 380 J U 230 J 440 79J

Indenol 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 49 .1 2^0 .' V 140.1 220.1 40.1

Dibenzola.hlanthracene U 89 .1 U 45 .1 S4.I Li

Benzol g.h,i)pery lent 82.1 330 J 46.1 140 J 270 .1 49J

TOTAL SVOCS ug,'kf I667 4100 1044 2070 6950 15'3 TOTAL SVOCs mp'kg 1.7 4.1 1.0 2.1 7.0 1.5 hfADEP RECiSE LIMIT TOTAL SVOCS (m_r,'kg) 100 100 100 100 100 100

Appendix D_v3.xls 6oflO

J - estimated value mg:kg - milligram 'kilograni U - not detected ug:'kg - microgram'kilo=Owm

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS015 30SOS015 30SOS015 30SOS016 30SOS016 30SOS016

GRIU# TOP5 TOP5 TOP5 R.^MP1 RAMP1 RAM PI

Sampling Date 11/5 '01 11/5/01 11'5/01 11/5'01 11 5 01 11/5/01

Sample Number 3OS0S015010 30S0S015015 30S0S015020 30SOS016005 30SOS0I6005F D 30SOS016010

Benzaldehvde U V V u L" U

Phenol u L" u u Li L!

bis(2-Chloroethyl)F.ther u L" Li u V Li

2-Chlorophenol u LI U u V U

2-Methyl phenoi u U u Li V U

2,2'-oxybis( 1 -Chioropropane) u U u u U u Acetophenone u u u L: LI u

4-Methyl phenol u u L; LI U 77.1

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine u V LI U V Li

Hexachloroethane u I U Li V U

Nitrobenzene i; \j V Li u u Isophorone u V V Li Li u

2-Nitrophenol u u u U LI u 2.4-Dimethyl phenol u u LJ L" r LI

Bis (2-chloroethox\) methane U u V I: u V

Naphthalene V L" u L: L' 42.1

4-Chloroaniline u U u V u U

Hexachlorobutadiene u V u V u Li

Caprolactam u u u V u L1

4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol L1 V u L u V

2-Methylnaphthalene V V u LJ Li 64J

Hexachlorocyclopentadienc V V i: V U U

2.4.0-Tnchlorop'nenol V I' L- V L1 li

2.4.5-Trichlorophfnol u u L: V L' II

i.l'-Biphenyl L1 u V u L U

2-Chioronaphthulent I' u V u L" L1

2-NitToamline V V L" i; Li L'

Dimethylphthaiate V V U LI Li LI

2,t>-Dinitrotoluene V c L! U U i;

Acenaphth\lene L V LJ L' U 1 I0J

3-Nitroaniline L" L; U U LI ij

Acenaphthene I1 r L! V L' Li

2^4-Dinitropheno: L: V L: r Li (_;

4-Nitrophenol L' u I; Li LI LI

2.4-Dinitrotoluenc t; i: Li Li LI

Dibenzofuran V L' u L! Li V

Diethylphthalatc i; u V L: V

4-Chlorophenvi pher\ lether r I! i.i V I u Fluorene Li L: i1 i; Li 110.1

4-Nitroanilme L: L; u 1/ U Li

4,6-Dinitro-2-methyiphenol U u u u L> L:

N-Nitrosodipher\ iamine i: u v: i V U

Appendix D-x.3.XIS 7 of 10

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

SVOCs

AOC C'SA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA h1ocb.pile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOSOI5 30SOS015 30SOS0I5 30SOSO16 30SOSCII6 3OSOSOI6

GRID# TOP5 TOP5 TOP5 RAMPI RAM PI K4MPI

Sampling Date 11:SiOi 11 5\01 11 '5-r01 115,Ol I1;5:01 11'501

Sample Number 30S0S015010 30S0S015015 30S0S015020 30SOS016005 30SOS016005FD 30SOS0I6010

L:4-Bromophenyl phenylether U Li I' U LI

Hexachlorohrnzene U U U U L: U

Atrazine U U U u U U

Pentachlorophenol u u V u U U

Phenanthrene 99J 311 89J 07J S1.1 $20

Anthracene U U U U U 130J

Carbazole U u U u U 301

Di-n-butylphthalare U V U I! U L:

Fluoranthene 120.1 42.1 1201 200J 220J 890

Pyrene I 00UJ 39J U 21OJ 2"3OJ I100

Butylbenzylphthalate I; U LI U U V

3,3'-Dichlorohenzidine LJ u U u U V

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthala1e 1103 450 510 280.1 2203 510

Benzo(a)anthracenr 5l.r U 635 1IOJ 1101 __50

Chrysene 583 30.1 771 140s 1601 610

Di-n-octvlphthalatc U U U V Ll V

Benzo(b)fl uoranthen e 54J 295 801 1JOJ I605 500

Benzo(k \fluoranthen e U U U 59s 645 710s

Benzo(aipyrene 36.1 u 371 82.1 945 410

Indene(1 .2.3-cdp~~ene I; V U 45J 46.1 190!

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene u u L' V 61.1

Benzo(g,h.i ipery lene u i.: U 54J 53.1 210.1

TOTAL SVOCs ug'kg 528 651 986 1417 1541 6653 TOTAL SVOCs mgkg 0.5 0.7 1.o 1.4 1.5 6.7 MADEP REUSE LIMIT TOTAL SVOCS (mg,kg) IO0 100 100 100 100 100

Appendix D-v3.XIS 8 of 10

J - estimated value mgkg - milligramkilo,"ram U ­ not detected ug,%g ­ microgram 'kilopm

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s

AO C CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS0K) 30SOS017 30SOS017 30SOS018 F1HLDQC

GRID** RAMP1 RAMP2 RAMP2 RAMP3 NA

Sampling Date 11 5 01 llo/Ol 11.501 11 '5/01 11/5/01

Sample Number 30SOS016015 30S0S017005 30SOS017O10 30S0S018005 30RBS011

Benzaldehyde IJ 130.1 I.' V U

Phenol i; U I) U 3 J

bis(2-Chloroeth\l)Ether u L' u I) U

2-Chlorophenol u U u U U

2-Methyl phenol u u i : Li U

2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) V u V I" U

Acetophenone u u u U u 4-Methyl phenol 45J i; 38 J U L1

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine U u U u U

Hexachloroeihane u u V u LI

Nitrobenzene u u i ; L; U

Isophoront II u L' L: U

2-Nitropheno! u u u L" U

2,4-Dimethyi phenol u u L1 U U

Bis (2-chloroethoxvi methane u u V u U

Naphthaiene V L! i; u U

4-Chloroanihne u U u u U

Hexachlorobutadiene u V Li u U

Caprolactam u V U 21 J u 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol i l; Li L1

2-Methylnapht'nalene u u L' U U

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene V L' V U U

2.4.6-Tnchlorophenoi {• L V. L1 i :

2.4.5-TrichlorophenoI V I" V V u l.l'-Bipheiul V u L; V u

2-Chloronaphthalene L1 V L' L" {'

2-Nitroaniline V V V.

Dimethylphthalate V L' L' i; Li

2.6-Dinitrotoluene f u V u l !

Acenaphthylene i : u 32 J u L1

3-Nitroanilme u Li Li U

Acenaphtnene V u 1KJ.I Li L:

2,4-Dinitropheno r L: 1/ C L'

4-Nitrophenoi 1; U i; I' L1

2.4-Dinitrololuene L' V V I;

Dibenzofuran i : U 64 j V I"

Diethylphthalatc U V V L1

4-Chlorophenyl phen\lethei L I' \: r LT

Fluorene r 23 J 9(. J W

4-Nitroanihne I! V r L' L'

4,6-Dimtro-2-meth> Iphenol ! _ • i: L' r r N-Nitrosodiphcnylamine V V i u i)

Appendix D-v3.xIs 901-10

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

s v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS016 30SOS01 7 30SOS017 30SOS018 FIELDQC

GRID t> RAMP ] RAMP 2 RAMP2 RAMP3 NA

Sampling Date 11'5'01 11 5'01 11/ 5 •'01 11 -501 11/501

Sample Number 30SOS0160I 5 30S0S017005 3OSOSO17O1O 30S0S018005 30RBS011

4-Bromopheny] pbenykther U U i: V U

Hexacblorobenzene L; Li u V U

Atrazine u V u V u Pentachiorophenol u U u V u

Phenanthrrne 85J 160J 630 J V u Anthracene u 36 J 120 J u L"

Carbazole u U 78 J u u Di-n-bu!ylphthalatc li 37 J U u u

Fluoranthene 200J 360 J 1500 2! J u Pyrene 160J 300 J 1300 U u

Butylbenzylphthalate U U V. i : u 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzi dine U u V U u

bis(2-Ethylhcxyl)phthalate 120.1 270 .1 19GJ 180 J 1J

Benzol a (anthracene 100.1 170J 670 U u Chrysenc 100.1 21 0 J 750 u u

Di-n-octyiphthaiate r 8.; J U u Benzo(b)fluoranthene 11OJ 24 0 J 860 i; V

Benzoiklfluorantnene 44J 74 J 391? L' u Benzo1a)pyrene 72.1 130 J 550 L' u

Indene( 1.22-cd )pyrene 42J 95 J 4111 V u Dibenzo~a.h ,anthracene V r 43.I V u

Benzo(g.h.i (perylene 41.1 1 40 .1 470 V u

TOTAL SVOCs ug7ig 1119 '358 8391 221 4 TOTAL SVOCs mg.lrg 1.1 2.4 8.3 0.2 0.004 MADEP REUSE LIMIT TOTAL SVOCS (mg'kg) 100 100 100 100 100

.4ppendix D-v?.xls 10of 10

J - estimated value mgkg ­ milligranikilogram U - not detected ugkg - microgram kilogram

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CS.4 Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Srockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stoclipilc

Sample Location 3osos01 I 3osos o I1 .:osos01I 30SOSOI1 : o s o s o 1 '

GRIDi: TOPI TOPI TOPI TOPI TOP '

Sampling Date II '5!01 I1 '5'01 11'5'01 11'5 01 11.'5,01

Sample \umber ?ososoI1005 3ososo 11o10 ?(ISOSOI1015 ?OSOSOI1020 ?(ISOSO12005

Dichlorodifiuoromethane U i; I. L1 U Chloromethane U V i; U U Vin>l Chloride U V V i: I" Bromomethane U V u U u Chloroethane u V u U Li

Trichlorofluoromethane u V i; U U 1,1-Dichlroethene V u u U U Carbon Disulfide u \) i : u U

l,l,2-tnchloro-l,2,2-tnfluoroet'nane II u f u u Acetone 680 370 J 190 u ' 290

Methylene Chloride u L" U (J L" trans-l,2-Dichlorocthene u U L! u V

MTBE. u U U u U 1,1-Dichloroethanc V Li U Li Li

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene V U 2 .i 740 U 2-Butanone 34 360 J 2 j 580 24 Chloroform U V V U U

1,1,1 -Trichloroet'nanc U e u L'

Carbon Tetrachloride U i; i : V i ;

Benzene I' i : i V u 1,2-Dichloroethane u V i: V i:

TCE u V i: I U 1.2-Dichloropropane u u \: V I'

Bromodichloromethanc i: u u L' L:

cis-1.3-Dichloropropcne i< L' i: L' U 4-Methyi-2-pentanone u L' L: I" L'

Toluene 8 60 .1 4.1 I' trans-1.3-Dichloropropene I" L" L I1 I,

1.1.2-Tnchloroethanc r I i: I ' L; PCt i; 11 810

2-Hexanone U u V "20 LI

Dibromochloromethanc L: I V r i

1.2-Dibromoethane I.I L1 r I i1

Chlorobenzenc V i: i : L r Ethylberuene I' r u V r

Styrene L V i" Li r Bromoform 2 J i : 0.9 J i; 0.9.1

isopropylbenzene 1 .1 L: U L: 2 .1

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethaiu- V r L: lr u U-Dichlorobcwene V i - u 3 .1

1.4-Dichloroben/ene u I.! u r 4 J 1.2-Dichlorobenzcnc u r i: L'

Appendix D-v3.xls 1 of 13

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stochpile

Sample Location ?OSOSUl I 30SOS011 30SOS011 30SOSOI1 3ososo12

GRID# TOPI TOPI JOP1 TOPI TOP2

Sampling Date 11:j10I 11:5 ,01 11/5'01 11'5101 ] 1 541

Sample Number 3ososo1 1oo5 3ososo11o1O 3usoso1IOl5 ?osOS(JI1020 3osOso Izou5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane u U U U I J 1,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene u U U 240 8

Total Xylene u u V U U Methyl acerate u 140 J V U I J Cyclohexane u U u u u

Methyl cyclohexane u U u 33 J u

TOTAL VOCS ~gl'kg 725 930 209.9 3123 339.9 TOTAL VOCs mgkg 0.725 0.93 0.2099 3.123 * 0.3399 MADEP REUSE LIMIT TOTAL VOCS (mgikg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugkg ­ microgramkilogram

.4ppendis D_v3.?ils 2o f14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

v o c s AOC CSA Stockpile CS4 Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile ('SA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS0I2 30SOS012 ::osos0I2 30SOS0I3 30SOS0I3

GRID# TOP2 TOP2 TOP2 TOP ' TOP?

Sampling Dale 11,.'01 I1 :5.'0l 11,5 !01 11 5'01 11 5.01

Sample Sumber 30SOS012010 3OSOS012015 30SOS0120Xl 3OSOS013005 30sos013(1Ill

Dichioroai11uoroniethaiie u u LI 1' 1:

Chloromethane V u V V L' Vinyl Chloride L' u V U L" Bromomethane L u V V L:

Chloroethane U u V V V "Inchlorofluoromethane r u V 50 J V

1.1-Dichlroethcne U u V L' V Carbon Disulfide Li u V Li 1 J

1.1.2-rrichloro-1.2,2-tnfluoroethane L" u u U u Acetone 2^0 43 16 480 J ' 3300

Methylene Chloride (J U U U U trans-l,2-Dichloroethene U U U u U

MTBE U V L1 u U 1,1-Dichloroethane L: u L1 L' U

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene U u L1 u U 2-Butanone 5.1 u V 480 J 12 Chloroform U u V U u

1.1.1 -Tnchloroeihane L u i: U L' Carbon Tetrachlonde U u V u I'

Benzene i; u L" Li L: 1.2-Dichloroethane u r u Li L:

TCE L: L: u L̂ u 1.2-Dichloropropane u L i; L1 V

Bromodichloromeihant' 1. r L V i:

cis-1.3-Dic'nloropropene L' i ; V V V 4-Methyl-2-pemanonc V L; u U V

Toluene 5 0.8 J u 110 .i 2J (rans-l,3-Dich]oropropene L" L1 u V V

1.1.2-1 nchloroethane L u I V V PCF. I I' r V

2-He\anone I Li V: L1 V DibromochloromethanL L u r r V

L2-Dibromoethant I l ; i; i' r Chlorobenzenc c V Li i; L' Ethylbenzene i; V u i; u

Styrene L V u i ' L' Bromoform l J 1.1 1.1 L 1 .1

lsopropylbenzen c i : V u V 0.8 .1 1, I .2.2-Tetrachloroethal?c r r I' {• I

1.;-Dichlorobenicne i 1 u r V I .J-Dichlorobrnzene l j V I' V

1.2-Dichlorobcnienc L' 1 u I; L:

Appendix D-\-3.sls 3 of 13

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOSOI2 30SOSO12 30SOSOIZ ?0SOSOI3 3OSOSOI3

GRID# TOP2 TOP2 TOP2 TOP3 TOP3

Sampling Date 11/5/01 Il/5 , ,01 11.'5/01 I I5' 01 I1 'S!O1

Sample Number 30SOSO1?010 ?osOso12o1S 30SOS012O?0 3OSOS013005 30S0S01?010

1.?-Dibromo-3-chloropropane u 1; V U U 12.4-Tnchlorobenzene u 1.) U U U

Total Xylene u u u U u Methyl acetate u u u 230 J u Cyclohexane u u u U u

Methyl cyclohexane u u u u u

TOTAL VOCs ugkg 282 45.8 17 1350 3316.8 TOTAL VOCs mgkg 0.282 0.0458 0.017 1.35 ' 3.3168 MADEP REUSE LIMIT

TOTAL VOCS (mg'kg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugkg - microgramkilo,Dram

.\ppendix D-\~_:.sls 4o f14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS013 30SOS013 30SOS013 30SOS0I4 30SOS014

GRID# TOP 3 TOP3 7OP3 TOP4 TOP4

Sampling Dale 11'5 01 11-5/01 11/5 01 1 i 5 01 11 -'5-01

Sample Number 3OSOSO13O1OFD 3OSOSO13O15 30S0SO1302O 30SOS014005 30SOS014010

Dichlorodifluoromethaiie f V i.; I' U Chloromethane L: V I1 U U Vinyl Chloride L: U u u u Bromomethane V I ; l_l u u Chloroethane i: u V u

Tnchlorofluoromcthane r u i ; u Li

1,1-Dichlroethene L: u V u U

Carbon Disulilde u U V I' U l,1.2-trichloro-1.2,2-trinuoroethane u U V U u

Acetone 1400 100 40 400 J 320

Methylene Chloride U U V U L: trans-l,2-Dichloroethene U U i : U u

MTBE i : u u u u 1,1-Dichloroethanc* r u i: u u

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene I' u V u i:

2-Butanone 4 .1 li r 410.1 3 J

Chloroform U u i U 1,1,1-Trichloroethane I L' L L: Carbon Tetrachlonde V t; i: L; L1

Benzene I' i; i. I! u 1,2-Dichloroethanc V u u L1

TCt V V i : u i'

1.2-Dichioropropanc I V li u i :

Bromodichiorometbane {'• i; r i; r cis-l,3-Dichloropropene V i : f i; L'

4-Methvl-2-pentanonc V i; L' i; I'

Toluene 1 .1 -• 4 L' 11

trans-1.3-Dichloropropene I' i : u 1" u

1,1,2-Trichloroethanc I L' i : \ i I' P C t r [' L I'

2-Hexanone L; i; I' C I'

Dibromochloromethani. L' L. I. I1 r 1.2-Dibromocthane I • I' I 1.: ) •

Chiorobenzene ; • i; L' i; i

Ethylbenzene V U I i ! i:

Styrene I: i : (/ r 5 J

Bromoform 1 .1 I! L r 1 J

Isopropylben/ene V r c 19

1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroelhanc V i: i r L 1,3-Dichloroben/ene V i: I: r r 1,4-Dichlorobenzene L' i ' I.' i- 0.8 J

1,2-Dichlorobenzcnc i: V i1 o.y.'

Appendix D-v?.sls 5 of 14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile <'SA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location 3ososo13 ?OSOS013 3ososo1 3 3ososo13 3ososo1 3

GRID# TOP3 TOP3 TOP3 TOP3 TOP4

Sampling Date 1l5!Ol 11'5.'01 11~5!01 11~5!01 I1/5/01

Sample Sumber iOSOS013010FD 3OSOSO13015 3OSOSO13020 ~~ososo14ooc 3ososo14o1o

1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U U U U U 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene U u 0.9 J U 2 J

Total Xylene U u I" u C Methyl acetate U u u 170J u Cyclohexane U u u u u

Methyl cyclohexane U u u u U

TOTAL VOCs ugkg 1406 115 44.9 209.9 209.9 TOTAL VOCs mgkg 1.406 0.115 0.0449 0.2099' 0.2099 MADEP REUSE LIMIT

TOTAL VOCS (mg'kg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugkg ­ microgramkiiogram

Appendix DPv3.xls 6 of 14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

v o c s

AOC CS.4 Stuckpile C'SA Stockpile ('SA Stockpile CSA Siockpile CS.4 Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS014 i o s o s u I 1 30SOS015 30SOSOli ?OSOS015

GRID# TOP4 TOP4 TOP5 7OP5 TOP5

Samnline Date 11 '5''01 llO'Ol 1I '30 I 11 5/01 115'01

Sample Number 30SOS014015 30SOS014020 30S0SO15005 30S0S015010 3OSOS01501?

Dichlorodifluoromethane i; i : u U I' Chloromethanc U u u V U Vinyl Chloride u u 'J V L:

Bromomethane u LJ *J U f Chloroethane u u M LT L1

Tnchlorofluoromethane u LI u t: L; l.l-Dichlroethene u U IJ u u Carbon Disulfide u U u u u

l.l,2-rnchloro-l,2.2-trifluoroethane u u u u u Acetone 270 76 22 130 ' 340

Methylene Chloride U U u u u trans-1.2-Dichioroethene U U u u u

MTBE U L' 1.1 u L; 1,1-Dichloroethane u i : u u u

cis-1,2-Dichioroethene V Li Ij L; V 2-Butanone V u \: u u Chloroform u u U LI u

1,1,1-Trichloroethane u V L- L; l :

Carbon Tetrachloride u V U u u Benzene V u u L1

1.2-Dichloroethane u V Ij u u TCE r u L1 u f

1.2-DiehloropropanL* I. (' I1 L" Bromodichloromethane i ; I" I' ',­ L'

cis-l,3-Dichloropropene u Li i ; L: U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone L1 U t: i ' U

Toluene U 15 r 0.0 .1 L:

trans-! ..i-DichloroproperiL u V u u L;

1.1.2-Tnchloroethane V i ; r I; u PCI: V L LT L:

2-Hexanone V L' u L1 U Dibromochloromethane V V u L I"

1.2-Dibromoethane [' r r r U

Chlorobenzent I' i. r L'

Ethylbenzene u Li u u U

Styrene i; 1 .! u u L:

Bromoform Li U V I J Li

Isopropylbenzene r {• V r L:

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethanc V V V i1 l :

1.3-Dichlorobenzene V u L; u Lr

1.4-Dichlorobenzenc i: V u i j L'

1.2-Dichlorobenzene V V LI u L'

Appendix D_v3.xls 7 o f l 4

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile

Sample Location 3OSOSO14 3OSOSO14 3ososo15 30SOS@i5 30SOS@i5

GRID# TOP4 TOP4 TOP5 TOP5 TOP5

Sampling Date 1I:5!@1 I1'5!01 U.'5'01 I1;5/01 11!YO1

Samole Number 3oSoso1401~ 30sos 0 I4020 3OSOSOI5005 30s@so15o1@ 3osos015o1'

1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U U V U U 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene u u V U U

Total Xylene u u V U u Methyl acetate u u u U u Cyclohexane u u u U u

Methyi cyclohexane: Li u 0 U u

TOTAL VOCs ugkg 270 92 23 131.9 340 TOTAL VOCs mgkg 0.27 0.092 0.023 0.1319 ' 0.34 MADEP REUSE LIMIT TOTAL VOCS (mgkg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugkg ­ microgramkilogram

Appendix D_v3.xls 8 of 13

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile ('SA S~ockpilr ('SA Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile ('SA Stockpile

Sample Location 3OSOSOI5 ?OSOSC,10 lSOSO16 3OSOS0I0 30SOS0H>

GRID# TOP5 RAMP1 RAM PI RAM PI R4MPI

Sampling Date 11-50! ll-5'01 11-5/01 1 1 -5'01 11 5 01

Sample Number 30S0S015020 30SOS01W105 30SOS016005FD 30SOS0I6010 30SOS016015

Dichlorodifluoro methane V Li i; V U Chloromethane V U Li V L" \'my1 Chloride V U U u U Brnmomethane V u L; I; Li

Chloroethanc V L: L: L: U Tnchlorofluoromeihane L" V LI LI U

Ll-Dichlroethene U u U u u Carbon Disulfide u u Ll u u

i,1.2-trichloro-1.2.2-trifluoroethane L! u U u LI Acetone *2 330 150 31 64

Methylene Chloride V U U L; U trans-1.2-Dichloroethene V L" V L: U

MTBE V U V L; u 1.1-Dichloroethane u V V U LT

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene u IJ u L! L1

2-Butanone u u 10.1 V V Chloroform u u t;

V V 1.1.1-Tnchloroethane V u i: I' u Carbon Terrachlonde u V u V L̂

Benzene I I" u V u 1.2-Dichloroethane r L' L1 L: u

TCr. U L' L: L1 u 1,2-Dichloropropane r L' L' 1 : L'

Bromodichloromethanc i: L' i: L V cis-1,3-Dichloropropene V i; i: L' V 4-Methyl-2-pentanone L' L' L: r \:

Toluene 6 1.1 2 J i; i J

trans-1.3-DichloropropeTe V L' L; L: L"

1.1.2-1 nchloroethane V V V r L

PCH r L' [' I'

2-Hexanone i ' i: V L' i:

Dibromochloromethane i : i; f I • V h2-Dibromoethane i; r r L' V

Chlorobenzene r L' L1 I i" Ethylbenzene L! V L' L! L:

Styrene V V r I! i:

Bromoform I.I 0.9J L' L' L'

Isopropylbenzcne i.1 L: r I' i1

1.1.2,2-Tetrachloroetharc i i t • i' L' 1,3-Dichlorohenzene V I' V L L'

1,4-Dichlorobenzene V L; i- V r 1.2-Dichloroben7ene u r {> L'

Appendix D-\_:.XIS 9 of 11

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile (:SA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile

Sample Location 30SOS015 3OSOSO16 30SOSO16 3OSOSOI6 ?OSOS016

GRID# TOP5 RAMPl RAMPI R..ZMPI RAMPl

Sampling Date 11/5/01 I14!01 11'5:OI 11!5./01 11'501

Sample Number 3OSOSO15O2O 3OSOSO16005 3C~SOSOI6005FD 3OSOSO16010 3OSOSO16015

1.2-Dibromo-khloropropane U U U U U 1,?.4-Tnchlorobenzene U U u U U

Total Xylene U U u U L Methyl acetate U U u 2 J U Cyclohexane U l i U U U

Methyl cyclohexane U V V V u

TOTAL VOCs ugkg 209.9 209.9 209.9 209.9 209.9 TOTAL VOCs mg,'kg 0.2099 0.2099 0.2099 0.2099' 0.2099 MADEP REUSE LIMIT TOTAL VOCS (mg:'kg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugkg - microgramkilogram

Appendix D-v3..xls 10 of 14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSA Slockpiie CSA Stockpile

Sample Location ?ososo; 7 3osos0I 7 ?OSOSOI8 FIELIlQC FIELDQC

GRID# RAMt': RAhlP7 RAMP3 NA NA

Sampling Date I I 5 01 11'5i01 1I '5 ,OI I 1 5:OI 1I 5/01

Sample \umber 30S0S017005 3Os0so 17oIo 33SOSO I80(15 XTHSOI 1 3OTBSOII

Dichlorodifiuoromethane L' V i; L" I" Chloromethane U u u LT V Vinyl Chloride Li u L.i U V Bromomethane U u u V V Chloroethane L! u LI i; V

Trichlorofluoromethane i: u L: u V 1.1-Dichlroethene u u L: u i; Carbon Disulfide 0.9.1 Ll Li u L1

l.l,2-trichloro-1.2.2-tnfiuoroethane u U L' u U Acetone 290 190 440 u u

Methyiene Chloride u u L L: u trans-1.2-Dichloroethene U u i; Li V

MTBE u LI i; L! V 1.1-Dichloroethane u V u L: V

cis-1.2-Dichioroethene u U u I.: u 2-Butanone 10,1 110 5 .1 L" u Chloroform u i; L! I." u

1,1,1 -Trichloroethane u u L1 L: L; Carbon Tetrachloride i: u LI L' I:

Benzene L' [•• L' L1 u 1,2-Dichloroethanc: i V L' L" u

TC t V i; U L u 1,2-Dichloropropane r L: L' r r

Bromodichioromethane V L! L: L L' cis-1,3-Dichloropropene V I' L L' u 4-Meth\i-2-pemanone V u L L' V

Toluene 2 .1 97 U L" V trans-1,3-Dichloropropene V V L' V V

1,1,2-Tnchloroethane i: V l ! l: V PCt i' V L: {' V

2-Hexanone i; L1 U r V DibramochloromethanL1

r U V 1,2-Dibromoethanc r r i {'

Chloroben/ene i u I: r V Ethylbenzenc L Li I1 r L'

Styrcnc L' I' L' i L. Bromoform 1 .1 I" U L: r

Isopropylbenzene i: i; I! 1.1,2.2-Tctrachloroethaiif I.' t;

L; u r 1.3-Dichlorobenzene I: i i u u i i ,4-Dichloroben/enc r i : V I' t: 1,2-DichIorobenzene U L' I. r

Appendix D-\.3.xls 11 of 14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile CSh Stockpile CS.4 Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location jOSOS0I7 ?OSOSOI- .~OSOSOIS FIELDQC FIELDQC

GRIDrt RAMPI RAMP2 RhMP? NA NA

Sampling Date 11, 5,01 II 5 01 i I.'S:OI Il( 5.01 11<5;01

Samnle \umber ?OSOS0 I7005 3OSOS01~01O 30SOSO1YOO5 YUBSOII iOTBSO13

I .2-Dibn,mo-?-chloropropanr t; i; l j U U 1.2.4-rnchlorobenzenz v 1I U U u

rota1 Xylene u u IJ U .u Methyl acetate u :' u U u C'yclohexane u u u U u

Methyl cyclohexane u u u U u

TOTXL VOCS ugikg 209.9 709.9 209.9 209.9 209.9 TOTAL VOCs mg/kg 0.2099 0.2099 0.2099 0.2099 0.2099 ,M.I,-IDEP REL'SE LIMIT

TOTXL VOCS (mgikg) 10 10 10 10 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ug'kg - microgramkilogram

Appendix D-v3.xls 1 ' of 14

CSA STOCKPILE SOIL DATA

v o c s

AOC CSA Stockpile CSA Stockpile

Sample Location FIELDQC FIHLDQC

GRID# NA NA

Sampling Date 11/5/01 11 -'5-01

Sample Number 30TBS0K 30RBS01 1

Dichlorodifluoromethanc U V Chloromethanc u V Vinyl Chloride u u Bromomethane u Li

Chloroethane u u Tnchlorofluoromethane u u

1,1-Dichlroethene u u Carbon Disulfide i: u

1,1,2-rrichloro-1.2,2-tn 11 uoroeihane u u Acetone u 7J

Methylene Chloride u u trans-1,2-Dichloroethene u u

MTBE u u 1,1-Dichioroethane u LI

cis-1.2-Dichioroethent V u 2-Butanonc u 6J Chloroform u U

1.1. 1 -Tnchioroerhane I! V Carbon Tetrachlondc u V

Benzene u i:

1.2-Dichloroet'nane LT I' TCF: U i;

1,2-Dichloroprupane i: u Bromodichlorometham- U i:

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene I" V 4-Methyl-2-pemanone I." 6.1

Toluene I1 L' tTans-1,3-Dichloropropene V f

l.i .2-Trichloroethane i: PCT. V

2-Hexanonu V 20

Dibromochloro methane i: i .2-Dibromoelhane [• r

Chloroben?ene V Ethylbenzene V r

Styrene V r Bromotonn V

Isopropylbenzenc r 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroe;hane I' r

1,3-Dichlorobcn/ene V r 1.4-Dichlorobenzene u i ! .2-Uichloroben7enc V r

Appendix D-1.3.xls 1.3 of 14

6

CS.4 STOCKPI1,ESOIL DATA

VOCs

AOC CSA Stockpile

Sample I.ocation RELDQC

GRID# NA

Sampling Date Il85AIl

Sample Vumber 30TDSOI4

I.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane L1

1.2.4-Tnchlorobenzene U

Total Xylene IJ

Methyl acetate u Cyclohexane u

llethyl cyclohexane u

TOTAL VOCs ug!kg 209.9 TOTAL VOCs mg!kg 0.2099 MADEP RELiSE LIMIT

TOTAL VOCS (mglkg) 10

J - estimated value U - not detected ugikg - microgram kilogram

CSA Stockpile

FIELDQC­

NA

l1~5~01

!ORBS01 I

U

U

U

u u

239.9 0.2099

10

Appendix D-v3.xls 14 of 14

APPENDIX E

Bills of Lading

(Originals can be viewed at >I,\I)EP under RTY 4-0037)

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-O12A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

Release Tracking Number'

BIL L OF LADIN G (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) 4 - 0 0 3 7

A. LOCATION OF SITE OR DISPOSAL SITE WHERE REMEDIATION WASTE WAS GENERATED:

Release Nane (optional)

Street: 5 K i t t r - d y e Ro3.d Location Aid O t L s B a s e

CltylTawn- O t i s ANGB 02542 ZlP code

Daterperiod of GeneraTion. 3 r i L 2 c , t0. October 2001

Additional Release Tracking Numbers Assoaated wth !his Bill of Lading:

* Note: If this 81 of Lading is rhe result of a Lmded Removal Action (LRAJ taken prior to NotXcation, a Release Tra&.king Number k not needed.

B. PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING:

NameofOrganmtion: Massachuse t x Air National Guard (WING)

Name of Contact: David C. Jacobson--~____ Title:

S o u t hstree!: I m e r Raad, Bldg. 1C17

City,Twn: Buzzards 9Ay MA 0254 2 State: ZIP Code:

Telephone: (559 1 9 6 8 - 5 1 3 4 - Ext:

C. RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING:

/ RP ~~ PRP spes+:2- ^ Owner Operator Generator - Transporter Other RP or PRP:

Fiduciary. Secured Lender of Muntcipalky with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G.L; c. 21E, s. 2)

Agency ur Public Uti@ on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E. s. 50))

Other Person:

If an owner and/or operator is not conduaing !he response action associated with the Bill of Lading, provide on an attachment the name, contad perron. address and : * o n e number, induding any area code and e x t e " . fur each. f know .

D. TRANSPORTER OR COMMON CARRIER INFORMATION:

T~~~~~~~~~~c~~~~ errier N~~. Carney S r o t h e r s Truck ing (DOT r e g . # -3171030)

Janice larren J-.J, . - r s t r i a l Coordinator Contact Person.

s r e t : 195 8 3rOZada;l

?!A 0 2 7 6 7 City,Town: Sate: ZIP Cade:

Teleohone: (5Ca ) 5 2 4 - 4 0 7 1 Ex:.:

E. RECEIVING FACILITYflEMPORARY STORAGE LOCATION:

Operator,Facility Name: C i t y of Taunton L a n d f i l l

Contact Person: Joe Farese Title: _ % & e Manager

330 East Srlz:ar.ia Street Street: 02780

pate: * ZIP Code: CiylTown: . Taunton

Telephone: 5 0 8 - 3 2 4 - 4 0 7 1 Ext.. 1 9 7

Type cf Faciliv: Asphait BatchiCold Mix LandfilliDispsai Incinerator Temporary Storage check one)

Asphait BatchiHot Mix LandfiHiDaty Cover Other:

Thermal Prccessing LandfiiliStructural Fill EPA ldentifkatlon t :

SE/W003424 Division of Hazardous WasteiClass A Permit : : - : ' D i v i s i o n of Solid Waste Management Permit#:

AckmL'Antwipated Penod of Temporary Storage (spec19 dates if applicable) __ - t o

Reason for Tenporari Storage

Revised 1oiY94 Page 1 of 3­

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-012A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

Release Tracking Number'

BIL L OF LADING (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) 30)

E RECEMNG FAClLITYflEMPORARY STORAGE LOCATION (continued): remporary Storage Address

Street:

31tyiTown State ZIP Code

:. DESCRlFTION OF REMEDlATlON WASTE: (check all that apply)

| r [ Contaminated Media (check all that apply) e Soil Grounawater , ? Surface Water Other-

I 2 | Contaminated Debris (checx all that apply) 3 Vegetation or Organic Debris f i Cemlitibn/Constructon Waste (~j Inorganic Absorbant Matertals 0 Other

Non-hazardous Uncontainerized Waste (check all that apply): Non-aqueous Phase Aquid Other

[ | Non-hazardous Containerized Waste (check all that apply): 0 TaflK Bottoms/Sluages c> Can!air.ers 0 Drum

(_J) Engineered Impotindmevts 3 O t h e r : .

'ype of Contaminakon (check all that apply) Q j Gasoline £ j Diesel Fuel 42 Oil #4 Oil Q #6 Oil [ H Waste Oil

[ J Kerosene 1-_. Jet Fuel [ ̂ Other­

istimated Volume of Materials: CJbic Yards: . Tons: 1 2 , OOC Other: I I . — .

ontaminant Sodrce (check onelspecify): Traflsportation Accident _j UnderGrourd Storage Tank l ^ l Other: . X i s t o r i c a l

tesponse Action Associated with Bill of Lading (check one): i - immediate Response Action I i Release Abatement Measure

Utility-Related Abatement Measure [^J Limited Removal A c t i o n g Comprehensive Response Action 0 Other ry

<emeciation Waste Ckarcterizatior, Support CocJmentation attacheb: | j Site History Information | 0 | Sampling and Analytical Methods and Procedures @ Laboratory Data Field Screening Data

If supportirg documentation is not appended, provide an attachment statirg thedate and in connection with what document scch information was previously submitted to DEP

; . LICENSED SFTE PROFESSIONAL (LSP) OPINION:

iame of organization: Snviror;n--,etai Chexica l Ca r7ora t io n

SP Name: AnthonT? F. XldTOTIFCO Title: . LSP

'elephone: ,(6171 328-9229 Ext.:

attest under the pains and penalties of perlury that I Pave personally examired and am familiar with this submittal, including any and all documents ccompanying this submittal In my professional opinior and judgment basea upm application of

I) the standard of care in 309 CMR 4 02(1), ii) tbe applicable provisions of 309 CMR 402(2) and (3). ard iii) the provisions of 309 CMR 403(5).

to the best of my knowledge. inforration and belief. the assessment actions urckrtaken to characterize the Remediation Waste which is (are) the Lbject of tbis submittal for aneptavce at the facility identified in this subnittal comply with tbe aoplicable provisions of 310 CMR 400000, and such 3cility is permitted to accept Remediation Waste havir.g the characteristics dacribed in this submittal. I am aware that significant penalties may result. icluding. Sut not limited to, possible fipes and imprisonment. if I submit in6rration which I icn0.w to b - c y r a t e or materially incomplete

LSP Signature: i^ 7*. Seal:

Date:

License Number: 610 5

Revised 1013l94 Page 2 of 3­

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-012A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

Release Tracking Number*

BIL L O F LADIN G (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) r r ~ i . 0037

H. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL OF LADING:

I certify under penalties of law that I have personally examined and am familiar vnth the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this certification. and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information. the material information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties. including. b notmited to, possible/fines and imprisonment. for willfully submitting false. inaccurate, or incomplete information.

Signature: Date:: ZG Ocj~ Name of Person (print):

Revised 10/3/94 Page 3 of 3

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Sife Cleanup BWSC-OI2C

BILL OF LADING (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) fielease Trackmg Number kr^ SUMMARY SHEET ! OF ^mSEtm

<. SUMMARY OF SHIPMENTS: Daily VolumT q p e d IDate of SShipment: Date of Receipt: Number of Loads Shipped: (cu. ydsTfons):;

V>—^ / i /

/ X ! I iI i >

i1 + I , • •' • /-2 . / / . / / .• : 3C

1. 1 •

-) / , -̂ / ; " • ,. >- . --" : ' - • < / . • > - / ; / ; - : n

i

' ^ /' •'

. :- - - • / / : ~ - • — '

i j

I !

I

i

I

I

I

j

I

1

i j

i

: 1

Summary Sheet Total Shipped: i ~~) <^~?

Bill OF Lading Total Shipped ' \ (only if different):

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC-012C

BILL OF LADING (pursuant to 310 CMR 40. ?elease Tracking Piumber

SUMMARY SHEET 2 O F .

<. SUMMARY OF SHIPMENTS: Daily Volume Shipped Date of Shipment: Date of Receipt: Number of Loads Shipped: (cU. yds.ltons):

D

C j?

/ ^ /' . r ;• / / " . ; •'-•*-' / = ? / / /" -/-SIS', /'c

r I

I

I

•I j I

i

iI

II

( j

I

i

Summary Sheet Total Shipped: /3P^ Bill of Lading Total Shipped (only if different):

l

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC-012C

BIL L O F LADIN G (pursuant to 310 C?AR 40.0030) iielease Trackng NJ,-~?,

SUMMARY SHEET 3 OF 3 h - .̂ r , -I CZS 1

K. SUMMARY OF SHIPMENTS: Daily Volume Shipped Date of Shipment: Date of Receipt: Number of Loads Shipped: (cu. yds./tons):

•--7 —

•'/" • ' 'M_

Summary Sheet Total Shipped:

^ ^ Bill of Lading Total Shipped (only if different):

• 1

I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection awsc-012~ Bureau ofVhsk See Cieonvp

BILL O F LADING (pursuan: !3 319 CHR 40.cao ReieasaTrackiq hJr;hei

SUMMARY SHcET &I - ' Co3 7

ONLY COMPLETE ONE COFY 0 ; THIS PAGE AND ATTACH TO THE FiHXL CO?Y OF THE SUMhURY SHEET.

L. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEFT 3F REMEDIATION WASTE AT RECElVlhG FACILlrY CR TEMPOFURY STORAGE:

7/ M. ACKK~~~LEDGMINT OF SHIPME.~T A?ID RECEIPT OF REMEDIATON WASTE BY PERSON

CONDUCTIhG RESPONSE ACTIOP; ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL OF UO!HG: '

raa' s r̂>aties of :aw 'J-.a! i Mv* p«r^:.-a:!y sjar-irac are i,n fa.-nla- .vit.T tia fnfs—aiisn ;eot*n»<; >t tftJ suCr»S3l, inc.'j^/rg :ry and all ­ts ai^TC3T/i'- j l~ts c^r'j.'ica'.cn. a."3 '."a:, based en rry i.ifluify 3f ̂ d e incvis.ais .'.vvcia'^ly .taccnsilt fccStainn^ ^e !nf'O(rr<*.tic/i, '_":e

iai Werrition ccrtareo in n«.-eir. i«, !c »K: 5«s: of .Tiy xrcvdedj: arw Sale' :.*ja. accurate and somclass I an aw r̂e * s ! tMra ace t^gnifi^r1. cenaitsa. me -.dm; ;u: net 'w.ec i , cosac1* 5.ies J"u irrcr,sinrren;, fcrwllfu.v 3t.tr-i--.-5 'a(se. maccuns. o* irccr-ple»e infomation.

Name ofPencr (p.-irt):

APPENDIX F

Landfill Acceptance Letter

WASTE MANAGEMENT VII 1- LiK'rrv LJIK* W o <

I' i.iiiipr,-n. N H C3>'4-

October 25. ZOO 1

I s . Trisn! Hinds En~~ironmental Chemical Corporation 5 Kittridge Road Ots Air National Guard Base

Otis .J.FB. MA 02542

ME: Letter of Intent for Massachusetts Military Reservation

To Whom It May Concern:

Pieass be 3 .ixe that jcil materiais originating from the Environmental Chemical Corporation k'xd at the ?Il~~achti~ett~ M i r a p Reseryation ma). be acceptable as daily cover material at the Taur,ron k . "n r F Landfill. 3?0 East 3ririania Street. Taunton. MA. provided that the material is mai-zed and is wirhin the 1zLels for reuse soil set forth by the DE? Soil Poiicy KO~fIv1-97-0OI Table 1 for iinzd landfills. Acceptance of any material to be utilized as daily cover 3t the Taunton Sanitary Landfill is sub-icct to satisfactory review of all analytical data. LSP opinion letter 2nd find approval by U-aste Management of Massachusetts. Inc. (WhlhLA).

Should you require additional information or if you have 'my questions pertaining to this matter. pl~3be do not he>ltatc to call me at 603-939-3434.

Verv truly vours. 'n "

AGElVfENT/OF MASSACHUSETTS. INC.

/

cc: Joe rarese

APPENDIX G

Nonconformance Reports

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

NCR No. ECC-MMR-D019-016

1. Contract No. Client 2. Contract Name: 3. Date: 7-6-01 Multiple Site Source Area

F1I6X-97-D-8009 AFCEE Remediation at MMR

4. Location 5. NCR Type 6. Contractor/Supplier N/A

Otis/MMR Site Restoration 7. Specification Section/Drawing NO.: 8. Originator: Phone No.: ; 02-80 section 1.3.2 Al Nickerson 508-363-9767

Contract requirement and nonconformance description: Section 2.3.2 contains the mixture of grasses to be used in site restoration and allows substitutions with permission of the COR. ECC will be substituting a mix requested by the COR which contains Little Bluestem at 10 lbs./acre. Switch Grass at 10 lbs./acre. and Annual Rye at 10 lbs./acre.

9. Quality Control Officer/Manager Date: 10. Reply requested from: 11. Reply due date:

Al Nickerson 7-6-01 N/A

12. Root cause of the problem and actions to prevent recurrence: This particular mixture is more acceptable for wildlife in the area.

13. Corrective actions: See item 12.

14. Prepared by: Date: Implementation Date: Date: 6-7-01 6-07-01

Al Nickerson

16Disposition Status of Corrective Action Reject Accept

17. Verification that nonconforming condition has been corrected:

1S. Inspection: Print Name: Signature: Date:

Environmental Chemical Corporation Quality Control Program

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

NCR No. ECC-~MR-DO19-017

1. Contract No. Client 2. Contract Name: 3. Date: 7-5-01 Multiple Site Source Area

F41624-97 -D-8009 AFCEE Remediation at MMR

4. Location 5. NCR Type 6. Contractor/Supplier N/A

Otis/MMR Soil Stockpile Covering 7. Specification Section/Drawing No.: 8. Originator: Phone No.: 02112 section 3.6.2.1 of the 100% Al Nickerson 508-563-9767 Remedial Design 8. Contract requirement and nonconformance description: Section 3.6.2.1 stdtes that all excavated soil in storage shall be on a babe lined with 6-mil polyethylene and be completely and securely covered with the same material for the duration of the storage period. Using updated technology ECC instead used a cellulose based mixture which is sprayed on the piles to cover them. This material provides a hard cover for the piles when dried which is easily applied at the end of the day arid is good for at least thirty days. This covering avoids all the problems normally associated with plastic and eliminates the disposal of the contaminated plastic.

9. Quality Control Officer/Manager Date: 10. Reply requested from: 11. Reply due date:

Al Nickerson 7-6-01 N/A

12. Root cause of the problem and actions to prevent recurrence: See Section 8

13. Corrective actions:

14. Prepared by: Date: Implementation Date Dat 7-06-01 7-06-01

Al Nickerson

16.Disposition Status of Corrective Action N/A Reject

17. Verification that nonconforming condition has been corrected: N/A

1s. Inspection: Print Name: Signature: na ture :

Environmental Chemical Corporation Quality Control Program

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

NCR No. ECC-MMR-D019-019

1. Contract No. Client 2. Contract Name: 3. Date: 8/21/01 Multiple Site Source Area

F41624-97-D-8009 AITEE Remediation at MMR

4. Location 5. NCR Type 6 Contractor/Supplier N/A

Otis; MMR Discharge of decontamination water from soil sampling equipment into Jacob Engineering Granular Activated Carbon System

Specification S e c t i o n / ? No.: 8. Originator: Phone No.: Greg Pierce 508-563-9767

Contract requirement and nonconformance description: This water was transferred to the Jacobs G.A.C. system. Without testing.

j 9. Quality Control Officer/Manager Date: 10. Reply requested from: 11. Reply due date:

AINickerson 7-10-01 N/A

12. Root cause of the problem and actions to prevent recurrence: ,j Due to the low concentrations in the decontaminated water, all water well below detection limits; we have data from previous sampling. ~

13. Corrective actions: See item 12.

14. Prepared by: Date: Implementation Date: 15. EM^Approval: Date: ; 8/21/01 8/21/01

Greg Pierce

16.Disposition Status of Corrective Action I Reject Z Accept

17. Verification that nonconforming condition has been corrected:

18. Inspection: Print Name: Signature: Date:

Environmental Chemical Corporation Quality Control Program