mlw - vfm cmg conference 25 02 10 linkedin
DESCRIPTION
Relationship between the DOF Capital Works Management Framework, Value for Money and Construction Cost and Cost TrendsTRANSCRIPT
International Cost & Project Managers
BRUCE SHAW PARTNERSHIP
Government Construction Conference 2010, Dublin.
Mark Wearen
Value for Money and Cost
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Cost and Project Management
ISO 9001 & 14001 – International Accreditation
Offices in Ireland, UK, Central Europe, Caribbean, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain
Projects all over the World including the USA, Africa and Japan
Total Resource Base of 300 Staff
Dedicated Specialist Divisions Include:
- Civils / Healthcare / Education / Commercial / Retail / Residential / MEP / PPP & PFI
Services Provided include- Risk and Value Management / Procurement & Supply Chain Management / Insurance
Assessment / Legal Support / Bank Reports
Bruce Shaw - Who We Are….
Bruce Shaw Clients Include…..Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Trinity College
Bruce Shaw Presentation February 2010
Presentation StructureCWMF and Value for MoneyCost and Value for Money
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – CWMF Objectives
Department of Finance Capital Works Management Framework (CWMF) -
Objectives :
Better efficiency in project delivery
Greater Cost Certainty….at contract award (applies to all stages)
Better Value for Money at all stages….particularly at hand-over
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM - Definitions
CWMF Definitions – Glossary of Terms
Value = Benefit
Value Management (VM) = Structured approach to maximising benefit
Value Engineering (VE) = Identifying opportunities to enhance value ‘without increasing the cost’
Key Value Drivers = Client preferences & prioritised benefits
Value for Money (VfM) = Optimum balance between benefits and investment
Key Value Drivers dictate how achieving VfM can be confirmed
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – Defining Key Value Drivers
Project objectives typically defined by
– Functionality (performance/scope)
– Quality (technical/aesthetic)
– Programme (delivery by a specific date)
– Cost (budget constraint/target cost/benchmark)
Success also measured using these criteria
One or all of these objectives can be ‘Key Value Drivers’
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – Defining VfM
VfM is ‘in the eye of the beholder’
Key value driver(s) can be one or a combination of different factors
VfM achievement can therefore be difficult to confirm so…
Critical to define requirements / benefits sought at appraisal stage to
facilitate later confirmation that VfM has been achieved
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – CWMF Key Value Driver
VE = Identifying opportunities to enhance value ‘without increasing the cost’
PWC – Cl. 4.8.1 confirms that VE proposals must not increase the Contract Sum
UK approach contemplates ‘value enhancement’ by increasing function ‘with a lesser degree of cost increase’
CWMF Key Value Driver appears to be Cost but other Key Drivers must also be addressed during VM/VE exercises
Other Drivers are also critical to VfM – the Sanctioning Authority and Sponsoring Agent have key roles from Appraisal Stage
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – Timing & Focus of VM
Potential to Change
Resistance to Change
Cost of Change
Appraisal
Time
CWMF Stages 1 to 4
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
CWMF and VfM – Measures to Achieve VfM
Policy and Procedures (e.g. CWMF/NRA Cost Management Manual) Aggregation Organisational Learning Implement Value Management from Appraisal to Review Implement Risk Management from Appraisal to Review Focus on All Objectives (including cost) Realistic Budgeting Consider Whole Life Costs at all stages Considered Risk Allocation (to party best placed to manage) Detailed Design/SI complete prior to tender process Incentivise the Contractor Timing
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Cost and VfM – Current Market
Cost Indicators Vs Tender Levels - Annual Changes
-50.0%
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
CSO WPI CGI W&M -Annual
Tender Index -Based on SCS -Annual
CSO - All Const Prod% Change
CSO - Civils Prod %Change
CSO - Building Prod% Change
DOF PWC Introduction
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Cost and VfM – Current Market
DOF PWC Introduction
Cost Indicators Vs Tender Levels - Cumulative Changes
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
CSO WPI CGI W&M - Cumul
CSO Const Lab - ManualOps - Cumulative
CSO WPI Materials Only -Cumulative
Tender Index - Based onSCS - Cumulative
DOF PWC Introduction
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Costs and VfM – Historical Markets and VfM
Source – www.wikinvest.com
Low Demand = Low Prices
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Cost and VfM – Current Market Conditions
Costs are at a 10 year low
Discounts of up to 25% off peak values are available
Are Contractors pricing inflation ? – Indicator of market view on recovery
Factors in differential between cost and tender level increases
– Industry has built up Management and Construction skillbase/efficiencies/Investment in Technologies/Innovative Solutions/New Tech etc
– Underlying costs do not fall as quickly as Contractors prices – risk allocation and strategic decisions
Loss of industry capacity will see loss in skill base etc = likely price increases
PWC Introduction – no apparent impact on trends
ESRI/International view – growth will return…at some stage – 2011/12/13/14 or beyond ?
Economic Cycle will turn - Avail of current market conditions to maximise VfM
Civils Vs Building Costs – onwards and upwards….eventually
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
Enduring Lessons of History….
“A thing is worth what it can do for you, not what you choose to pay for it.”
John Ruskin
Government Construction Conference - February 2010
International Cost & Project Managers
BRUCE SHAW PARTNERSHIP
Government Construction Conference 2010, Dublin.
Mark Wearen
Value for Money and Cost
Thank You