mkukuta/per consultations 2007 dpg session mkukuta/pefar 22 may
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007
DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR
22 May
![Page 2: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PEFAR 2007 Components
PEFAR 2006 LGA
Sector/LGA analysis
Core analysisMay consultations
September consultations Scenarios analysis PEFA parastatals CPAR parastatals
Budget outturn
Planning/ budgeting
![Page 3: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Main messages from PEFAR core analysis
• Rising aggregate expenditure, high level of aid dependency, expenditure needs for sustained growth raise urgent questions of medium and long term expenditure strategy
• Government has invested heavily in instruments and processes for strategic allocation – Budget Guidelines/MTEF, SBAS – but these are not yet working effectively for strategic planning or as a base for dialogue and accountability
![Page 4: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Key challenges for medium term budget strategy
• Aggregate and recurrent expenditure continues to rise (28% GDP), posing serious question on sustainability
• Major increase in external financing (from 6% to 12% GDP over past five years), need for a medium and long term strategy for reducing aid dependency
• Effective absorption of aid will depend on making critical strategic choices on expenditure composition
• Need to plan for– increased investment expenditure, appropriate balance between
development/ recurrent,– major focus on growth promoting expenditure, esp infrastructure
investment,– medium term strategy on wage bill underpinning public service
reform
![Page 5: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Medium term expenditure planning - how well does the steering work?
Observations from budget preparation in FY07• MDA budget requests highly unrealistic (on
average 150% above available resources, no link to previous year’s decision on MTEF year 2)
• ‘Priority investments’ in Budget Guidelines weakly aligned with existing sector plans (eg transport)
• MDA initial submissions prepared in excessive detail (eg ) absorbs scarce planning capacity, distracts from key strategic decisions
![Page 6: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How well does the steering work?(part 2)
• Lack of early consistent policy direction: late preparation of Budget Guidelines, key changes between BG and MTEF (eg implementation of consolidation of allowances in wage bill)
• Three years after introduction of Strategic Budget Allocation System still no reporting on actual expenditure by main MKUKUTA categories (objective, target, activity)
• Track record on external financing projections shows deviation of 4-5% GDP, FY07 projections still heavily skewed to existing commitments
![Page 7: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Problems with the MTEF
Existing MTEF has the following weaknesses• Absence of clear Cabinet/political decision on strategic
priorities early in the cycle • MDAs begin detailed budget submissions without
guidance on resource constraints and strategic priorities• Excessively detailed budget classification for early
submissions• Uncertainty on external financing within the resource
envelope• Lack of a clear, user friendly published summary of the
MTEF as a base for accountability• Lack of reporting on MKUKUTA/MTEF actual
expenditure
![Page 8: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Strengthening the MTEF
• Scenario analysis – early guidance on resource envelope,– greater clarity on external financing,– focus on key programs at MKUKUTA
objective/target level– public debate on strategic allocation
![Page 9: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Reporting on MKUKUTA expenditure
• Since 04/05, SBAS has been GOT chosen means of translating MKUKUTA into expenditure plans and budget (objective, target, activity)
• GBS Annual review October 06 – GoT committed next PEFAR will be based on SBAS reports
• Assuming reports available shortly, analysis will be carried out prior to next GBS annual review
• Analysis should combine assessment of outturn with review of classification structure – consultation with DP working groups will be important
![Page 10: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Key issues local government
• LGAs heavily dependent on central government transfers: more than 90 per cent of funding comes as transfers
• Tracking of funds to LGAs through different channels is difficult
• Transfer of development funds to LGAs is a challenge
• Balance between PE and OC transfers questionable
![Page 11: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Scenario analysis
• Objectives
• GoT perspective, rrelation to budget process
• Implications for DPs/ DP working groups
![Page 12: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Objectives
• Strengthen GoT capacity to translate the MKUKUTA into a realistic MTEF
• Improve the transparency and dialogue on moving from broad MKUKUTA objectives to resource constrained strategic priorities
• Provide a framework for integrating external financing into the MTEF, addressing predictability issues on medium term aid
![Page 13: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
GoT perspective
• Must be fully integrated with budget process, directly linked to subsequent development of detailed Budget Guidelines
• Budget Guidelines Committee should provide oversight to ensure link to budget process
• Keep it simple : simplest option might be existing MTEF resource as base case, second scenario maps spending plans based on trend actual external financing
• DP /consultant technical support can be useful for background analysis, but scenarios must be firmly rooted in MDA spending plans
![Page 14: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Proposed work program for DP working groups
• June : Background note on resources and issues for scenario analysis
• July-September – reference group for sector issues on scenario
development,– analysis of MKUKUTA/SBAS expenditure reports,
comments on revised SBAS categories for scenarios/BG
– Group review of proposed MTEF financing projections, update of results matrix
• September : Participate in consultations on GoT MTEF scenarios
![Page 15: MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081205/56649ebf5503460f94bc92ac/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Background note on resources and issues
• Inventory/assessment of existing resources on which sector scenarios can be based (MKUKUTA costing, sector expenditure plans, other existing/ongoing sector analysis)
• Summary of key issues in the sector for enhancing base case (existing MTEF) and developing scaled up scenario