mixing engineering and biology

50
1 Mixing engineering and biology

Upload: lenka

Post on 23-Feb-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mixing engineering and biology

1

Mixing engineering and biology

Page 2: Mixing engineering and biology

Where Fish Passage is required

Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish habitat assessments standards are under development for TRANS. These are will indicate species specific and crossing specific information so sensitive sites (such as spawning sites) can be avoided when planning the location of watercourse crossing sites.

2

Page 3: Mixing engineering and biology

Even areas that don’t exactly look like spawning habitat ….

3

Page 4: Mixing engineering and biology

…require fish passage.

4

Page 5: Mixing engineering and biology

5

In terms of culverts, dependent on one’s viewpoint, a culvert providing fish passage is envisioned as either this:

Page 6: Mixing engineering and biology

6

or this………..

Page 7: Mixing engineering and biology

7

Fish Passage Criteria

• Culvert Diameter• Culvert Slope• Roughness• Velocity• In certain cases, type of fish species

and invertebrate species

Page 8: Mixing engineering and biology

8

In the past, TRANS had approached regulatory agencies in comparing velocities and depths in a stream to what was in the culvert.• For example, we used to produce

this type of table:

• Note: This has now been updated.

Channel Culvert

Discharge (cms)

Stream Depth (m or Y)

Mean Stream Velocity

(m/s or V)

Inlet Outlet

Depth (m)

Mean Velocity

(m/s)

Depth (m)

Mean Velocity

(m/s) 2.3 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.67 0.5 0.49 4.5 0.75 1.0 .75 0.97 .75 0.76 7.4 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.26 1.0 1.04

Page 9: Mixing engineering and biology

9

Unfortunately, we didn’t realize that the relationship between hydrotechnical design parameters was not clear to folks that weren’t used to dealing with it. For example, how did flow relate to velocity?

Page 10: Mixing engineering and biology

10

???

Page 11: Mixing engineering and biology

11

In order to create this basic understanding with everyone we’ve used a real life example to illustrate

the process.In this we are using the new (draft)

Fish Passage Design Discharge (FPDD).

Page 12: Mixing engineering and biology

12

The project involves 12 watercourse crossings – 3 of which are fish bearing. The fish species that is present is Athabasca Rainbow Trout.

Page 13: Mixing engineering and biology

13

Athabasca Rainbow Trout sampled along Highway 32

Page 14: Mixing engineering and biology

14

This is fish habitat.

Page 15: Mixing engineering and biology

So is this.

15

Page 16: Mixing engineering and biology

16

This is one of the culvert crossings we will be replacing.

Page 17: Mixing engineering and biology

17

We’ve approached the issue of fish passage by using a series of

informational tools. It proves due diligence and we now have a record

of the site.Here are some of the tools.

Page 18: Mixing engineering and biology

18

We produced individual site analyses using satellite imagery.

Page 19: Mixing engineering and biology

19

• Topographic

Page 20: Mixing engineering and biology

20

Basin Size

Page 21: Mixing engineering and biology

21

• Slope

Crossing 2

Page 22: Mixing engineering and biology

22

Site 2 – Slope Summary

• Channel Slope At Crossing S~ 1.2%• Upstream of Crossing S~ 2.9 to 6.2%• Downstream of Crossing S~ 1.8%• (entering receiving channel)

Page 23: Mixing engineering and biology

23

In comparison Site 3 Topographic

Page 24: Mixing engineering and biology

Basin

24

Page 25: Mixing engineering and biology

25

Slope

Crossing 3

Page 26: Mixing engineering and biology

26

Site 3 – Slope Summary

• Channel Slope At Crossing S~ 1.1%• Upstream of Crossing S~ 3.2 to

8.0%• Downstream of Crossing S~ 0.8%(entering receiving channel)

Page 27: Mixing engineering and biology

Defintions

Q - Discharge = the rate of flow of water. It is the volume of water passing through a cross section of a channel in a given period of time. This is not a constant value; it is constantly changing. It is expressed as cubic meters per second (CMS)

27

Page 28: Mixing engineering and biology

• A - Area = Cross sectional area of flow in the channel.

• V - Velocity = the mean velocity for the cross section, as determined by V=Q/A.

Whatever you do remember that V = Q/A

28

Page 29: Mixing engineering and biology

29

Definitions:  • Y - depth of flow• B – channel bed width• h – hydraulic bank height • T – top width• S – channel slope• n – roughness parameter

Page 30: Mixing engineering and biology

30

 

Page 31: Mixing engineering and biology

31

Summary Table

Inlet Outlet9540 (2) 22 28 2.0 1.2 1.35 0.39 1.1 1.1 1.1

Y @ QFPDD

(m)

VelocityFPDD

Culvert (m/s)

QFPDD

(m3/s) *

Channel (m/s)

Site DA (km2)

QDesign

(m3/s)

Y @ QD

(m)

Stream Slope at Site (%)

Design flow and corresponding flow depths calculated as per AT's Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines.* Based on AT's discussion of the recommended fish passage design discharge

Page 32: Mixing engineering and biology

DA = Gross Drainage Area (km2) In this case 22 km². Q Design= flow (cubic meters per second)

32

Page 33: Mixing engineering and biology

Slope is 1.2 %

33

Page 34: Mixing engineering and biology

Y@ QD= depth at design flowY @ QD = average channel flow depth at design flow (discharge)

But the numbers you really have to watch for are:

34

QFPDD = flow at fish passage design discharge

Y @ QFPDD = depth at fish passage design discharge

Velocity FPDD = velocity at fish passage design discharge

Page 35: Mixing engineering and biology

35

Figure 1. Typical Channel Parameters: B=2.5, h=1.0, T=5.0, S= 1. 2%, n=0.06

Design flow parameters: Fish passage design flow parameters: QD = 28 m3/s QFPDD = 1.35 m3 YD = 1.5 m, YFPDD = 0.39 VD = 2.6 m/s VFPDD = 1.1/1.1 (Inlet/Outlet) Cross-sectional area for QD = AD = 6 m2 Cross-sectional area for QFPDD = AFPDD = 2 m2

Page 36: Mixing engineering and biology

Remember, fish are energetically efficient.These are average velocities meaning there are lower and higher velocity zones in the culvert.

The trout will exploit these.

36

Page 37: Mixing engineering and biology

37

Although implicit in this presentation TRANS embeds culverts to D/4 up to 1 meter

Page 38: Mixing engineering and biology

38

Techniques we are using to enable fish passage in steeper creeks 1% and greater.

Substrate Holders

Page 39: Mixing engineering and biology

39

In culverts located on higher gradient streams and those where culvert velocities at the FPDD exceed those in the natural channel, substrate holders can help to provide more low velocity zones. 

Page 40: Mixing engineering and biology

40

Substrate holders are small weirs installed in the culvert to retain substrate in the culvert. The substrate provides additional roughness to reduce velocities, with an added benefit of flow variation. This method is typically effective for long culverts where backwater effects are lost.

Page 41: Mixing engineering and biology

41

• Substrate holders are designed to hold an engineered streambed in the culvert while allowing for natural sediment transport processes to occur in the stream.

• for culverts ≤ 3 m in diameter, 200 mm high weirs should be used with Class 1M rock riprap, and

 

Page 42: Mixing engineering and biology

• for culverts > 3 m in diameter, 300 mm high weirs should be installed with Class1 rock riprap.

Caroline will show you pictures in her presentation.

42

Page 43: Mixing engineering and biology

43

• The maximum spacing of the substrate holders is equivalent to the substrate holder height divided by the slope of the culvert.  

• Currently the effect of these substrate holders is being researched.

• More information is available in the draft ‘Culverts and Fish Passage’.

Page 44: Mixing engineering and biology

Fish are energetically efficient and behavior and physiology play a big role in movement.

A couple of other points to bring up. Sockeye salmon migrating 1000 km up the Fraser River to spawn will use a strategy that sail boaters use when trying to move against the wind. In the salmon’s case it is trying to move against the current (when they can) instead of facing it straight on.

It’s referred to as tacking.44

Page 45: Mixing engineering and biology

45

Page 46: Mixing engineering and biology

There are also energetic advantages to being in a school of fish.

‘Fish, famously, have no need for bicycles, but schools of fish swim as though they were cyclists. Just like a Tour de France peloton, fish at the back of a school use the slipstream created by the stronger fish out in front to swim with less effort.’

46

Page 47: Mixing engineering and biology

Fish swim in schools partly to evade predators and partly to improve their chances foraging for food. Until now, it was thought that these groups were egalitarian structures in which all members benefited equally in food terms, regardless of their position.

47

Page 48: Mixing engineering and biology

"Fish with higher rates of tail movement would have been working harder to propel themselves forward and therefore spending more energy," he said. "An analogy would be human runners: those taking the most steps each minute are those having to spend the most energy.“

The researchers estimated that when the school was swimming at 30 centimetres per second, trailing fish were having to work 12% less hard compared with the fish they were following.

48

Page 49: Mixing engineering and biology

49

"One of the most interesting things that these results hint at is that there may be differences in energy demand or performance capacity between schools in the wild. It wouldn't be smart for a fish to join a school with others that are much slower or faster than it is."

Page 50: Mixing engineering and biology

As we’ve said

Nobody knows a lot about fish swimming dynamics.

50