mite 6023 sep 2011 key paper 1 - review analysis commentary by group 1
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Key Paper #1 - Review, Analysis, and Commentary
Group 1 members:
Brant Knutzen
![Page 2: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Reading #1 – Discussion A • The term ‘Distributed Leadership’ has 3
powers:
– Normative Power – it reflects the current changes of leadership practice in schools
• Gronn’s “greedy work” – the expansion of leadership tasks and responsibilities in schools has resulted in work that will consume a single leader’s life
![Page 3: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Reading #1 – Discussion A
• Representational Power – it describes the alternate leadership practices that are becoming prevalent • New leadership practices are:
– Distributed
– Extended
– Shared
• “Cross multiple boundaries to share ideas and insights” – Wenger, 2002, pg 123
• Multi-agency: – Federations
– Partnerships
– Networked Learning Communities
– Extended Schools
![Page 4: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Reading #1 – Discussion A
• Empirical Power – research evidence that distributed leadership makes a
positive difference to organisational outcomes and student learning (Harris 2007, Leithwood 2004, 2007)
• Limitations of the term “distributed leadership” – Conceptual overlap and confusion
• “devolved leadership”
• “effective teamworking”: social activity theory
• “catch all” term for shared, dispersed practice?
– Theory vs Practice • “what is it?” vs “how is it done, and to what effect?”
![Page 5: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reading #1 – Discussion B
• Distributed Leadership can be used as an analytical frame – A tool that offers constructs for
• Framing a diagnosis • Informing the design process • How does the distribution affect the school? • Leadership as a practice, not a role
– Offers a way to track, analyze, and describe: • Patterns of interaction • Influence • Agency
![Page 6: MITE 6023 Sep 2011 Key Paper 1 - Review Analysis Commentary by group 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071820/55b4ed7bbb61eb362d8b45cc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Reading #1 – Discussion B
Research: What do Harris and Leithwood say about the relationship between distributed forms of leadership and improved organizational performance and outcomes? • Harris, A. (2007) ‘Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical
reticence’, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3): 1–11
• Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louis, K., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004) How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the learning from leadership project. New York:Wallace Foundation.
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss,T., Sacks, R., Memon, N. & Yashkina, A. (2007) Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. University of Toronto, OISE