missouri s&t: the state’s lean, mean economic machine
DESCRIPTION
Missouri S&T: The State’s lean, mean economic machine. Quality Measures. ABET Accreditation Visit. On campus October 18-21, 2008 16 engineering programs evaluated. Aerospace Engineering Architectural Engineering Ceramic Engineering Chemical Engineering Civil Engineering - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
enrollment.mst.edu
Missouri S&T:The State’slean, mean
economic machine
QualityMeasures
ABET Accreditation Visit
On campus October 18-21, 2008 16 engineering programs evaluated
Aerospace EngineeringArchitectural EngineeringCeramic EngineeringChemical EngineeringCivil EngineeringComputer EngineeringElectrical EngineeringEngineering Management
Environmental EngineeringGeological EngineeringInterdisciplinary EngineeringMechanical EngineeringMetallurgical EngineeringMining EngineeringNuclear EngineeringPetroleum Engineering
Engineering laboratories and equipment Faculty size
On campus February 22-25, 2009
Two-year project
Institutional Self Study Report is available on-line at http://accreditation.mst.edu.
North Central Associationof Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Focus On Outcomes: Career Success for Grads
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$44,000
$46,000
$48,000
$50,000
$52,000
$54,000
$56,000
$58,000
$60,000
513 576 668 673 644
$2,576 $2,603 $2,596 $2,647$2,749
$49,181
$51,059
$53,669
$55,975
$57,521
Employers Recruiting on CampusAvg. Co-op SalariesAvg. Starting Salaries
Year
Career Opportunities
Fall Career Fair- 174 employers – 80 from Missouri- 30 states- 2,500 students/alumni attended
Nucor Week- Largest single-employer event in S&T history- 26 Nucor representatives from 10 divisions on campus- Nucor invested over $120,000 and 1,380 hours- Nucor visited with 1,737 students
U.S. News: High School Guidance Counselors’ Rankings
800 guidance counselors from the top high schools in the US ranked national universities based on their knowledge of the institution’s academic record, curriculum, faculty, programs, and graduates.
National Universities- Missouri S&T is tied for 45th in the nation- Missouri S&T is ranked 2nd in Missouri
Public Universities- Missouri S&T is ranked 12th in the nation- Missouri S&T is ranked 1st in Missouri
U.S. News: High School Guidance Counselors’ Rankings
Examples of Key Schools
Arch Coal:
1 of 5 universities
Garmin International:
1 of 8 universities
Nucor Corporation:
1 of 4 universities
Toyota:
1 of 6 universities
US Steel:
1 of 12 universities
$191.1M
75months
0
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
0
50
100
150
200
Dollars Raised
Mon
ths
Dol
lars
(in
mill
ions
)
Advancing ExcellenceCapital Campaign Progress
As of September 30, 2009
Office of Sponsored Programs
FY09 vs. FY08:- Proposals awarded in total dollars: $42.5M
up 11%
- Proposals submitted in total dollars: $171.5M
up 13.5%
- Number of proposals submitted: 566
up 3.1%
- Research expenditures: $37.8M
up 0.5%
- F&A recovered: $6.9M
up 16%
- Number of active awards: 633
up 5.3%
Office of Sponsored Programs
FY10 activities through August and a year-over-year comparison are as follows:
- Proposals awarded in total dollars: $14.7M
up 7%
- Proposals submitted in total dollars: $49.1M
up 85%
- Research expenditures: $9.5M
up 20%
- F&A recovered: $1.7M
up 18%
- Number of active awards: 632
up 5%
E³=CEnergy
Environment = Civilization
Education
Innovative E³ Activities at Missouri S&T
Missouri Energy Summit
Energy Chair Professorship
Wayne and Gayle Laufer Energy Chair
- 1967 Civil Engineering graduate
- $3.4 million
- first endowed chair in the critical field of energy
- the largest ever received by any of the four University of Missouri campuses for a faculty position
DOD Appropriations
$3 M Advanced Polymer Systems for Defense Application—Power Generation, Protection and Sensing
$3 M High Performance Alloy Materials and Advanced Manufacturing of Steel Castings for New Light Weight and Robotic Weapon Systems
$6M Locating and Tracking Explosive Threats with Wireless Sensors and Networks
$3M Ultra-High Temperature Materials for Hypersonic Aerospace Vehicles
$2M Waves, Wind and Scavengers: Next Generation Renewable Energy Systems for Naval Applications
U.S. DOT
Awarded $2.7M – Federal Transit Administration
Scope of work:- Utilize Kansas City’s existing airport shuttle service as platform to
demonstrate viability of Plug-In Electric Vehicle (PEV) technologies - Evaluate pathway to integrate renewable energy into an electric vehicle fleet
Partners- Federal Transit Administration- City of Kansas City- Kokam America- Missouri Transportation Institute
City of KC PEV Demonstration
KC Aviation Division will utilize the Optare plug-in electric shuttle bus
City of KC Fleet operations will utilize the Ford Transit Connect EV (manufactured by Smith EV-US in Kansas City)
Expansion of PEV Demonstration
Additional federal funding received to expand Plug-in Electric Vehicle Demonstration
Will add a PEV Shuttle Bus on Missouri S&T campus
19
S&T
U.S. DOE Transportation Electrification
Awarded $5M – Advanced Electric Drive Vehicle Education Program
Scope of work:- Engineering curriculum- Advanced auto manufacturing, mechanic, and safety training- Public outreach and education
Partners:- Saint Louis Science Center- University of Central Missouri- Linn State Technical College- Smith Electric Vehicle
58% already considering graduate school
79% chose Missouri S&T as their 1st choice institution
58% were high school varsity athletes
94% plan to join a student organization
68% plan to join a student design team
44% would like to study abroad
26% plan to be involved in music and theatre
67% plan to complete a BS in 4 years or less
Miners’ Fall 2009 StatsBreaking National Trends
Band
/Musi
c
Intram
ural A
thleti
cs
Varsi
ty Ath
letics
Stude
nt Gov
ernmen
t
Thea
ter
Radio/
TV
Servi
ce Orga
nizati
on
Publi
cation
s
Debate
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
High SchoolCollege
Identifying interests of incoming students
SOURCE: ACT’s AIM 2008
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
839805
910
863 879 880
771 772754 764
738 733
1,0041,024 1,009 1,011
988 995
1,2321,204
1,259
1,2051,233
1,348
908
977 992
1112 11281163
Help with Writing 20%Help with Math Skills 16%Help with Reading 23%Help with Study Skills 20%Want to Study Abroad 26%
Inquiring students’ self-identified interests and needs
SOURCE: ACT’s AIM 2008
Student Design Teams
Formula SAE Michigan May 2009 Results- Over 100 teams from around
the world competed- S&T finished 6th in the world
and 3rd in the US- S&T design team won the Altair
William R. Adam Engineering Award
1 Graz Univ of Technology
2 Rochester Institute of Technology
3 Ecole De Technologie Superieure
4 Purdue Univ - W Lafayette
5 Univ of Applied Sciences - Graz
6 Missouri S&T
7 Univ of Michigan - Ann Arbor
8 Georgia Institute of Technology
9 Univ of Michigan - Dearborn
10 Centro Universitario Da FEI
11 Duke Univ
12 Universite Laval
13 Univ of Akron
14 McGill Univ
15 Auburn Univ
16 Univ of Evansville
17 Univ of Manitoba
18 Ohio State Univ
19 National Univ of Singapore
20 Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst
21 Univ of Florida
22 Univ of Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh
23 Penn State Univ - University Park
24 Univ of Pennsylvania
25 Brown Univ
Miner Recreation Building
Student Design Center PlansProposed Renovations
Innovation Park
Innovation Park
First building
Tenniscourts
Fitness Center
Fitness Center
State-of-the-art equipment to include:- 15 ellipticals with entertainment- 15 treadmills with entertainment- 15 bicycles with entertainment- 1 ergometer, 2 rowers, 2 climbers- Stretching and core strength equipment- Dumbbells, Olympic bars and plates, benches, and
racks- Selectorized weight machines
Fitness Center
Varsity Fitness Room
Varsity Weight Room
Toomey Hall Dedication
April 17, 2009
enrollment.mst.edu
Enrollment Update | Fall 2009Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri
Missouri S&T will increase its enrollment by improving access, expanding diversity, increasing retention, expanding extended learning activities, controlling tuition, and providing more endowed scholarships.
Missouri S&T will balance the academic portfolio and the student experience by increasing market share in areas such as life sciences and biotechnology, energy, business and management, communication, the liberal arts, and education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Increase enrollment and manage the academic portfolio:
2009 Incoming Class
Since the name change, our undergraduate freshmen out-of-state applications have increased by 27% and our out-of-state enrollment has increased 9%
Fall 2009 freshmen class was 1,134 students. Fall 2009 transfer class was 340 students. This is 60% larger than the class of 2000
- 24% female students
VERY talented Fall 2009 incoming class:- 4 with perfect 36 on ACT- 1 with perfect 1600 on SAT- Average ACT composite is 27.7 - 35% have ACT composite of 30+
41% Increase in Undergraduates (1507) 41% Increase in Female Students (+435) 73% Increase in Graduate Students (+682) 91% Increase in Minority Students (+342) 40% Increase in Non-Engineering Majors
Since 2005, 60% of Growth due to Increased Retention Rates 87% to 88% Retention Rate Achieved and Sustained 62% Graduation Rate Achieved. 65% possible by 2010
Lower discount rate from +38% to 27% Generated over $21 M in additional gross revenues
2001-2009 Enrollment Change
Actual
Original Goal
Goal
2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012
Total Enrollment 4,626 5,858 6,167 6,371 6,815 6,300 6,425 6,550 6,550
Undergraduate Students 3,698 4,515 4,753 4,912 5,205 4,730 4,770 4,800 4,800
Graduate Students 928 1,343 1,414 1,459 1,610 1,570 1,655 1,750 1,750
Freshmen Class 696 977 1,051 1,056 1,134 1,005 995 985 975
Transfer Class 210 266 276 286 337 300 300 300 300
American Indian/ Alaskan Native 24 20 33 33 44 32 34 36 36
Asian-American 117 198 198 191 174 220 230 240 240
Black, Non-Hispanic 159 245 271 299 352 315 325 335 335
Hispanic-American 53 137 139 132 149 160 175 190 190
Total Female 1,071 1,326 1,391 1,419 1,485 1,425 1,450 1,480 1,500
Undergraduate Female 860 1,016 1,052 1,101 1,161 1,100 1,115 1,125 1,135
Graduate Female 211 310 339 318 324 325 335 355 365
Freshman Female 196 221 255 273 268 250 260 270 275
Transfer Female 45 70 74 67 89 85 90 90 90
On-campus 4,393 5,389 5,649 5,768 5,768 5,655 5,735 5,825 5,825
Distance Education 233 469 518 603 603 645 690 725 725
Strategic Plan Goals
#1 Question: How Did it Happen?
silver bullet
strike of lightening?
or
the truth is……….
silver buckshot: +92 strategic institutional, policy, market, facility, program and partnership changes.
Trend Overview
Total Enrollment Fall 2000-Fall 2009
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
3,69
8
3,75
6
3,84
9
4,08
9
4,12
0
4,31
3
4,51
5
4,75
3
4,91
2
5,20
5
928
1,12
7
1,39
1
1,37
0
1,28
7
1,28
9
1,34
3
1,41
4
1,45
9
1,61
0
Undergraduate Graduate
47% Total Enrollment Growth: 2000: 4,626 2009: 6,81541% Undergraduate Growth: 1,507 Additional Students
73% Graduate Growth: 682 Additional Students
Campus and Distance/Online Enrollments Fall 2000-Fall 2009
40% Growth of Campus Enrollment: 1761 Additional Students184% Growth of Distance Enrollment: 428 Additional Students
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
4,39
3
4,57
5
4,84
8
4,98
3
4,93
6
5,10
1
5,38
9
5,64
9
5,76
4
6,15
4
233 308392 476 471 501
469518 607
661
Diversity of Enrollments
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2000 -2009 change
Undergraduate 3698 3756 3849 4089 4120 4313 4515 4753 4912 5205 41%
Graduate 928 1127 1391 1370 1287 1289 1343 1414 1459 1610 73%
TOTAL 4626 4883 5240 5459 5407 5602 5858 6167 6371 6815 47%
Enrollment By LocationOn-Campus 4393 4575 4848 4983 4936 5101 5389 5649 5764 6154 40%Distance or On-Line 233 308 392 476 471 501 469 518 607 661 184%
Enrollment By Ethnic GroupAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native 24 26 23 27 23 21 20 33 33 44 83%
Asian-American/Native Hawaiian 127 128 137 151 142 158 198 198 191 174 37%
Black, Non-Hispanic 168 197 213 230 218 237 245 271 299 352 110%
Hispanic-American 58 63 83 100 100 126 137 139 132 149 157%
Non-Resident, International 590 723 819 749 600 565 585 619 674 819 39%
Ethnicity Not Specified 171 179 209 253 298 253 250 242 248 291 70%White, Non-Hispanic 3,488 3,567 3,756 3,949 4,026 4,242 4,423 4,665 4,794 4,986 43%Total 4,626 4,883 5,240 5,459 5,407 5,602 5,858 6,167 6,371 6,815 47%
Total Minorities, Non-Caucasian US Citizens 377 414 456 508 483 542 600 641 655 719 91%% of Total 8% 8% 9% 9% 9% 10% 10% 10% 10% 11%
Under-Represented Minority US Citizens 250 286 319 357 341 384 402 443 464 545 118%% of Total 5% 6% 6% 7% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 8%
Non-Resident, International 590 723 819 749 600 565 585 619 674 819 39%% of Total 13% 15% 16% 14% 11% 10% 10% 10% 11% 12%
Enrollment By GenderFemale 1,050 1,097 1,133 1,248 1,209 1,224 1,326 1391 1419 1485 41%
23% 23% 22% 23% 22% 22% 23% 23% 22% 22%
Male 3576 3786 4107 4211 4198 4378 4532 4776 4952 5330 49%77% 77% 78% 77% 78% 78% 77% 77% 78% 78%
Total Female Students Enrolled F’00-F’0941% Increase: 424 Additional Female Students
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20091,000
1,050
1,100
1,150
1,200
1,250
1,300
1,350
1,400
1,450
1,500
1,050
1,097
1,133
1,248
1,2091,224
1,326
1,3911,419
1,485
Under-Represented Students F’00-F’09118% Increase 295 Additional Students
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
250
286
319
357341
384402
443464
545
Total International Students EnrolledFall 2000-Fall 2009
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
590
723
819
749
600
565585
619
674
819
Incoming New Freshman Class
Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 20090
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
18682015 2080
22792388
2625
696914 977 1051 1056 1134
ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled
Incoming New Transfer Students
Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
398421
488459
532570
195
279 266 276 286
337
ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled
Incoming New Graduate Students
Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 20090
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1907
1410
1781 1731
2052 2099
348 355 392 434 467 492
ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled
Distribution by Academic GroupingsFall 2009
76%
10%8% 2%1%3%
Engineering
Business & Computing
Math & Natural Sciences
Liberal Arts
Social Sciences
Undecided & Non-Degree
Engineering60 % increase: 2000: 3272, 2007: 4666, 2009: 5149
Business, Computing & Information Sciences51 % increase: 2000: 454, 2007: 619, 2009: 687
Liberal Arts52 % increase: 2000: 83, 2007: 121, 2009: 126
Math & Natural Sciences42 % increase: 2000: 392, 2007: 524, 2009: 555
Social Sciences5 % decrease: 2000: 79, 2007: 98, 2009: 75
Undecided36 % decrease: 2000: 346, 2007: 139, 2009: 223
Growth by Academic Fields2000 to 2009
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20093000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
3272
3568
37683842 3852
4110
4409
4666
4829
5237
Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009
Engineering =
• AERO• ARCH• CERAMIC• CHEMICAL• CIVIL• COMPUTER• ENG MECH• ENG MGMT• ELECTRICAL• ENVIRNMTL• FRESHMAN•
GEOLOGICAL• GEOTECH • IDE• MATERIALS•
METALLURGY
• MINING• NUCLEAR•
PETROLEUM• SYSTEMS
60% INCREASE
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009300
400
500
600
700
800
454
491
563596 601
579601
619 627
687
392 405438
482505
520504
524505
555
Business, Computing & ISTMath & Natural Sciences
Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009
Business & Computing =
• MBA• BUS&MS• COMP SCI• IST
Math & Natural Sciences =
• BIOLOGY• CHEMISTRY• GEOLOGY• MATH• PHYSICS
51% INCREASE
42% INCREASE
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
8391
113 114 112 108119 121
115126
7991
7985 83 83 87
98 95
75
Liberal Arts Social Sciences
Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009
Liberal Arts =
• ENGLISH• HISTORY• TECH
COMM•
PHILOSOPHY
SocialSciences =
• ECONOMICS•
PSYCHOLOGY5% DECREASE
52% INCREASE
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
608
876
10611001
899963
10191060 1080
1198
539620
756696
563 574 597 590 557637
69
256305 305 336
389 422470
523561
Engineering (On-Campus) Engineering (Extended Learning)
Growth by Academic GroupingsGRADUATE ONLY Fall 2000 – Fall 2009
Engineering =
• AERO• ARCH• CERAMIC• CHEMICAL• CIVIL• COMPUTER• ENG MECH• ENG MGMT• ELECTRICAL• ENVIRNMTL• FRESHMAN•
GEOLOGICAL• GEOTECH • IDE• MATERIALS•
METALLURGY
• MINING• NUCLEAR•
PETROLEUM• SYSTEMS
TOTAL ENGINEERING: 97% INCREASE
18% INCREASE
713% INCREASE
Geographic Presence
Students’ Home Counties
ADAIR
ANDREW
ATCHISON
AUDRAIN
BARRY
BARTON
BATESBENTON
BOONE
BUCHANAN
BUTLER
CALDWELL
CALLAWAY
CAMDEN
CARROLL
CARTER
CASS
CEDAR
CHARITON
CHRISTIAN
CLARK
CLAY
CLINTON
COLE
COOPER
CRAWFORD
DADE
DALLAS
DAVIESSDE KALB
DENT
DOUGLAS
DUNKLIN
FRANKLIN
GENTRY
GREENE
GRUNDY
HARRISON
HENRY
HICKORY
HOLT
HOWARD
HOWELL
IRON
JACKSON
JASPER
JOHNSON
KNOX
LACLEDE
LAFAYETTE
LAWRENCE
LEWIS
LINCOLN
LINN
MCDONALD
MACON
MADISON
MARIES
MARION
MERCER
MILLER
MONITEAU
MONROE
MORGAN
NEWTON
NODAWAY
OREGON
OSAGE
OZARK
PERRY
PETTIS
PHELPS
PIKEPLATTE
POLK
PULASKI
PUTNAM
RALLS
RANDOLPH
RAY
REYNOLDS
RIPLEY
ST. CLAIR
SALINE
SCOT-LAND
SCOTTSHANNON
SHELBY
STODDARD
STONE
SULLIVAN
TANEY
TEXAS
VERNON
WARREN
WAYNE
WEBSTER
WORTH
WRIGHT
MADRIDNEW
MISSIS-SIPPI
BOLLIN-GER
GIRARDEAUCAPE
WASHING-TON
JEFFER-
SON
ST
LOUIS
CITY
MONT-GOMERY
GAS-
CON-
ADE
SCHUY-LER
LIVING-STON
LOUISSTCHARLES
ST
PEMI-SCOT
GENEVIEVESTE
0
1
8
6
1
3
3
7
23
70 110 13
2
8
20
2
4
1
16295
5
1 1
4 12
11 6
1 8 3
8
4
34
7
23
9
13
811
74
7 3415
50
4701,119
122
20 153200
35
21
16
1781
2341
ST FRANCOIS
2411
80314
6
7
8
38
26
323170
23
37
67
2423
9
52
1116
6
50
7
718158
14
4
46
19
3
4 11 9 19
48 3
615
2
5
10 23
2
14
9
3
4
410
6
11
35
+50 students
30-49 students
10-29 students
1-9 students
0 students
Fall 2009
Fall 2009
RI
48
63
2
2
55
2848
194
51
126
38
2
32
4,673
64
10128
7
2
23
21
44126
16
30
15
14
22 22
7
17
13
19
22
15
22
6
143
6
13
Total Enrollment
- 49 states & 51 nations
- 73% Missouri residents
- 11% minority students
- 12% international students
DC 2
3
Students’ Home States
2
1
4
+25 students
10-24 students
1-9 students
RI
4.3
5025
100
80
150150
64.714.3
46.2100
10.5
1.6
11.6
60
39.1
25.4
5.9
16.729.3
0
71.4
15.0
90.9
15.752.9
0
87.5
36.4
22.2
15.8 120
40
41.7
333
26.7
46.7
36.4
3333
100
40 50
20
85.7DC 2
200
% Change in EnrollmentsFall 2006 - Fall 2009
100
0
0
25% or greater
10% – 24.9%
5% – 9.9%
4.9% – -4.9%
-5.1% – -9.9%
-10% – -24.9%
-25% or greater
Fall 2009 Inquiries – FreshmenGraphed by 3 Digit Zip Code
Red areas are metropolitan areas with largest inquiry growth
S&T’s Global Presence
Blue = S&T AlumniGreen = Current StudentsRed = MOA universities
Our Challenges
College Progression Rates in Missouri
NCHEMS 2006
For every 100 Ninth Graders
# Graduate from High
School
# Enter Colleg
e
# Are Still Enrolled Their
Sophomore Year
Percentage of 9th graders who
graduate from HS on time, go directly to college, return for their second year,
and graduate within 150% of program
timeMissouri
100 77.2 44.1 28.8 20.9Nation
100 68.6 42.3 28.4 19.7
Missouri’s P-16 Pipeline
Only 2 of 10 eighth graders ready for college prep curriculum in high school (ACT 2008)
College-Going Rate (%) - 2006 Fall First-Time Freshmen Directly out of High School
Missouri: 57.1 Nation: 61.6 A Larger Proportion of Missouri Students Starting at Community
Colleges Freshmen Headcount Distribution at Missouri Colleges & Universities
(DHE 2008) 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Community College 31% 24% 31% 30% 36% 41%Public College/University
51% 55% 47% 46% 42% 39%
Private College/University
18% 21% 22% 24% 24% 20%
Total Freshmen 39,505 33,560 35,034 35,184
41,135 48,181
The Midwest and Northeast will experience a 4% to 10% decline in high school graduates between 2009 – 2014 (WICHE)
The profile of college-bound students is rapidly becoming more ethnically diverse and female dominant (NCES, WICHE, ACT, College Board)
The number of students interested in engineering, computer science, and natural science degrees has declined to record lows (ACT, CIRP)
More full-time college freshmen are choosing to start at two-year colleges (IPED, MODHE)
More students are enrolling in more than one college at a time (National Student Clearinghouse)
Future student market growth will include more students requiring financial aid and loans to complete a degree (WICHE)
Key changes in the college-bound student markets
% change in Missouri general population by county 2000-2008
Source: USDA, Bureau of the CensusPublished by: University of Missouri Extension, April 2 2009
-14.4% - -0.1%
0% - 4.9%
5% - 9.9%
10% - 19.9%
20% - 39%
Missouri Average = 5.6%
By 2012, Missouri will have 4,000 fewer high school graduates each year
WICHE, 2008
College-going rates continue to fall
Source: CIRP
Change in Intended Major 1976-77 to 2006-07
0%
7%
14%
21%
28%
Business Engineering Education BiologicalSciences
ComputerScience
SocialSciences
Art, Music,Drama
HealthProfessions
76-77 86-87 96-97 06-07College Board, 2007
SOURCE: ACT EIS 2008
> 5%
20,000 fewer potential engineering majors
College Bound ACT Tested Students Interested in Any Engineering Field
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
High School Seniors: 72,467 High School Graduates: 61,752 ACT Testers/College Bound: 47,240 Any Engineering Interest (all testers): 1,768 Any Engineering Interest, (+21 testers): 1,256
(21 = MO average score / 50%) Engineering Interest, +24 comp. score: 961
(24 = UM minimum for auto admission) Missouri S&T Freshmen Engineering 681
Enrollees:
Missouri’s 2008 student funnel for ALL engineering fields
SOURCES: MODESE 2009, ACT EIS 2008, PeopleSoft
71% S&T market share
34% first-generation college students
+80% are receiving scholarships & financial aid
22% qualify for Low Income Pell Grants
82% plan to work while enrolled at S&T
29% have/carry a credit card12 already have a monthly balance over $1000
Financial Profile
Estimated 2009/2010Based on 30 credit hours per academic year
MO Resident
$ 7,3682,070
960 7,632
$ 18,030
Midwest Student Exchange
(IN,KS,MI,MN,NE,ND,WI)
$ 11,0522,070
960 7,632
$21,714
Non-Resident
$ 18,4592,070
960 7,632
$ 29,121
TuitionFeesBooks & SuppliesRoom & BoardTotal
- Room and Board based upon average residential life cost for the campus population.- Budgets based upon 8 hours of supplemental fee courses.
Cost of Education
How Do We Plan for the Future?
1. What is the total faculty’s teaching load? 2. How many classrooms and seats does the campus
have available? 3. How many science/engineering labs are available? 4. How many residence hall beds are available for paying
students? 5. How many parking spaces are reserved for students? 6. What is the per meal dining capacity?
Focus Our Future Plans on Optimizing the S&T’s Operational Capacity
Impact of the Economy?
46%: The Economy Has Changed Which College Students will Attend
SOURCE: Longmire & Company, Inc. 2009 “Study of the Impact of the Economy on Enrollment”
76% indicated they would be “somewhat” or “very likely” to consider a more expensive institution if it could deliver greater value.
SOURCE: Longmire & Company, Inc. 2009 “Study of the Impact of the Economy on Enrollment”
enrollment.mst.edu
Enrollment Update | Fall 2009Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri