ministry of environment, forests and climate chnage … minute... · minutes of 30th eac meeting...
TRANSCRIPT
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 1 of 77
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHNAGE
(IA DIVISION-NON COAL MINING SECTOR)
******
SUMMARY RECORD OF 30th MEETING OF THE RECONSTITUTED COMMITTEE OF
THE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF
MINING PROJECTS CONSTITUTED UNDER EIA NOTIFICATION, 2006.
The 30th Meeting of the Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee for
Environmental Appraisal of Mining Projects (Non-Coal) of the Ministry of Environment,
Forests and Climate Change was held during January 29-30, 2015. The list of
participants is annexed.
After welcoming the Committee Members, discussion on each of the Agenda Items
was taken up ad-seriatim.
Item No. 1:
(1.1). Confirmation of the Minutes of the 29th EAC Meeting.
The Minutes of the 29th Meeting of EAC held during January 15-16, 2015 were
confirmed and circulated.
Agenda Item No. 2:
Day 1: 29th January, 2015 (Thursday)
Consideration of Environmental Clearance Proposals
(2.1). Mining of Sand (Minor Mineral) in the Mine of “Karnal Unit-2” with
production capacity of 80 Lakhs TPA (ROM) of Sand by M/s Shri Devender
Nagpal, S/o Shri Ramdass, located at villages-Shergarh Tapu,
Mohiddinpur, Jharauli, Nabipur, Khirajpur, Mohammadpur & Khuda Kalan
(Block/Knl-3), Ghir (Block/Knl-8) & Nalvipur (Block/Knl-9), District-
Karnal, Haryana (974.10ha)-(Consultant: Grass Roots Research &
Creation India (P) Ltd.)-EC
The proposal of Shri Devender Nagpal, S/o Shri Ramdass is for mining of Sand
(Minor Mineral) in the Mine of “Karnal Unit-2” with production capacity of 80 Lakhs TPA
(ROM) of Sand in mine lease area of 974.10 ha. The mine lease area is located at
village(s)-Shergarh Tapu, Mohiddinpur, Jharauli, Nabipur, Khirajpur, Mohammadpur &
Khuda Kalan (Block/Knl-3), Ghir (Block/Knl-8) & Nalvipur (Block/Knl-9), District-Karnal,
Haryana. The lease area lies in the bed of River Yamuna & outside the river bed too. The
Latitudes and Longitudes of mine lease area are (Block/Knl-3) Latitudes: 29°45'57.12"N
to 29°43'29.65"N; Longitudes: 77°07'49.29"E to 77°07'52.03"E, (Block/Knl-8) Latitudes:
29°48'18.46"N to 29°47'36.22"N; Longitudes: 77°06'14.09"E to 77°06'57.11"E,
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 2 of 77
(Block/Knl-9) Latitude: 29°41'20.13"N to 29°40'26.08"N Longitude: 77°5'17.74"E to
77°4'49.28"E (Block/Knl-11) Latitudes: 29°37'45.04"N to 29°36'26.18"N Longitudes:
77°06'03.94"E to 77°06'42.62"E respectively on toposheet numbers 53G/1, 53G/2,
53G/5, 53G/6. The Project is located in seismic zone-III. Interstate boundary of Haryana
and Uttar Pradesh lies within the 10 Km radius of the lease area.
The proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Mining) in its
meeting held during March 20-21, 2014 to determine the Terms of Reference (TOR) for
undertaking detailed EIA study. The TORs were issued by the Ministry vide letter no. J-
11015/50/2014-IA.II (M) dated 5th May, 2014. The Proponent submitted the EIA/EMP
report online to the Ministry seeking environmental clearance after conducting Public
Hearing.
The proposed project is an open-cast mining project, confined to excavation of sand
from the proposed site. The project consists of land type of both riverbed & off-river bed
(paleochannels). The rate of production of sand will be 8.0 million TPA (ROM). Project
Proponent reported that the Sand from the dried river bed will be excavated at the rate of
4.0 million TPA (ROM) and outside the river bed @ 4.0 million TPA (ROM).
Total mine lease area is 974.10ha. Out of which, river bed area is 563.10ha and off
river bed (agricultural land) area is 411ha. The operation will be manual on river bed
blocks & in off-river bed blocks operation will be semi-mechanized with use of excavator,
Trucks etc. Extraction of material will be done only during day time and will be completely
stopped during monsoon season. The Letter of intent has been issued to Shri Devendra
Nagpal by Director of Mines & Geology, State Govt. of Haryana, Chandigarh vide letter no.
DGM/Hy/Karnal Unit-2/2013/117 dated 03.01.2014. Life of mine is 10 years. The
Committee viewed that as per existing guidelines regarding depth of mining in River bed
will be upto 3m or at least a meter above the water level whichever is less. Similarly,
depth of mining shall be 9m in Agricultural land or upto the depth above existing layer of
the soil whichever comes first.
The Committee noted that PP will use 411.0ha agricultural land for the mining
activities which may affect the fertility of the soil. The Committee noted that a
representation was received from the Society for Awareness and Development which
inter-alia has cited the Report of Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar (2006) which was
relied upon by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana requiring the Environmental
Impact Assessment Authorities to examine the issues prior to grant of environmental
clearances. The Committee noted that the provision of the EIA Notification, 2006 entails
prior examination of issues before the proposals are recommended for EC. HAU in their
summary have concluded with respect to three Districts namely Sonepat, Panipat and
Yamuna Nagar that, “the sand mining has disturbed the natural soil profile, land
degradation due to soil erosion, formation of gullies at the junction of mined and un-
mined fields and drifting of fine dust particles causing air pollution; the depleted soil
fertility and low water holding capacity of the soil as a result of sand mining, the inputs of
requirement in terms of fertilizers and water will be high resulting in high cost of crop
production and less net profit”. Representation has also been received requesting the EAC
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 3 of 77
to consider sand mining cases in the meetings to be held during the next few months.
Accordingly, the issue of mining over agricultural land should be considered in a broader
prospective and views of various Expert Institutions that have carried out detailed studies
and research, should be taken before any sand mining or mining of any mineral which is
otherwise abundantly available elsewhere, be allowed over agriculture land. Though, the
present proposal is for District Karnal but the impact being of similar nature, the
Committee is of the view that all necessary precautions to prevent the degradation of the
surrounding eco-system shall be put in place. In case any degradation is noticed, the
affected fertile land shall be duly compensated for loss in productivity.
Proponent reported that no ecologically sensitive area such as National Parks,
Wildlife Sanctuaries, Tiger Reserves falls within the study area (10 km radius of the mine
boundary). However, one Reserved Forest exists within the study area. The conservation
plan for Schedule-I species Monitor Lizard, Black Buck & Peacock and for Schedule-II Rat
snake, Mongoose, Jackal & jungle cat has been approved by Chief Wildlife Warden of the
State Government. The total water requirement is 10 KLD including water demand for
domestic purpose, dust suppression & green belt development which shall be met by
tanker supply.
Baseline studies were carried out during March-2014 to May-2014). All parameters
for air, water, soil & noise quality were within the permissible limits. The Public Hearing
for the proposed minor mineral mining project was conducted on 01.12.2014 at village-
Shergarh Tapu, District-Karnal, Haryana. The Public Hearing was presided over by Shri
Girish Arora, Addl. Deputy Commissioner, Karnal. The representative from Haryana
Pollution Control Board was also present. The issues raised during Public Hearing were
discussed during the meeting. Action plan with budgetary provision for the points raised
during the Public Hearing has been incorporated in the Project Report.
Total cost of the Project is Rs. 3.33 Crores. The Project Proponent has earmarked
Rs. 16.70 Lakhs towards capital cost for Environmental Protection Measures and Rs. 13.06
Lakhs per annum has been earmarked towards recurring cost. The PP has earmarked Rs.
19 Lakhs towards CSR activities.
Further to the information cited above, the Committee desired that Project
Proponent should submit the following documents/clarifications and on receipt
of the same, the EAC shall consider without calling the Project Proponent:-
(i) Detailed Report on the likely increase in productivity of Agricultural land in the post
mining period with restoration process to productive level (as informed by the PP on
the basis of Reports of some Research Institutions Along with the concerned reports of
the studies made. .
(ii) Proposed Protective measures in respect of this Project having located in seismic
zone-III as part of Disaster management plan indicating mitigation measures for
moderating the disaster effect;
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 4 of 77
(iii) Details of compensation proposed to be given to farmers as per R&R Policy of the
State Govt. along with pert chart showing acquisition, and returning land for
cultivation after mining activity;
(iv) A Plan for providing potable drinking water in village(s) viz. Shergarh Tapu,
Mohiddinpur, Jharauli, Nabipur, Khirajpur, Mohammadpur & Khuda Kalan, Ghir &
Nalvipur with high fluoride content in water;
(v) Proposed Plan with map for 7.5 m green belt as proposed by the PP between mining
land and adjacent Agricultural land to minimize loss of top soils and wind velocity; and
(vi) Compliance of TOR No. 34 w.r.t. Public Health related issues has not been adequately
addressed.
(2.2).Proposed Limestone Mine with production capacity of 0.5 million TPA (ROM)
of Limestone & Marl production by M/s UltraTech Cement Ltd., located at
Village Ottakovil, Taluk & District Ariyalur, Tamil Nadu (74.38 ha)-
(Consultant: J.M. EnviroNet Pvt. Ltd.)-EC
The proposal of M/s UltraTech Cement Ltd. is for Limestone Mining Project with
production capacity of 0.5 million TPA (ROM) of Limestone & Marl production in the
mine lease area of 74.38 ha. The mine lease is located at Village- Ottakovil, Taluk &
District – Ariyalur, Tamil Nadu. The Latitudes & Longitudes of the site are 110 12’17”
N to 110 12’52” N and 790 06’04” E to 790 06’48” E respectively & part of study area
falls within the Survey of India Toposheet No. 58 M/4.
The proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Non-coal Mining)
in its 4th meeting held during 20th to 22nd February, 2013 to determine the Terms of
Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA. TORs has been issued MoEF vide letter
no J-11015/425/2012- IA. II (M), dated 26th March, 2013. The EIA/EMP report was
submitted online to the Ministry for seeking environmental clearance after conducting
Public Hearing.
Total mining lease area is 74.38 ha which is a private Patta land. No forest land
exists within the ML Area. Letter regarding grant of mining lease over an area of
74.38 ha area in Ariyalur District (Tamil Nadu) for mineral limestone & Marl has been
issued by Commissioner of Geology and Mining, Department of Geology and Mining
vide their Letter No. 7057/MM1/2009 dated 22.02.2012 in favour of M/s Grasim
Limited. Mining Plan including Progressive Mine Closure Plan for the proposed mine
has been approved by IBM, vide letter no. TN/ALR/MP/LST-1908-SZ dated
01.08.2014. Mining is proposed to be done by fully mechanized open cast method by
formation of benches of maximum 6.0 m height. Excavation will be by drilling and
blasting. The ROM will be transported to the crushing plant which is located in cement
plant at Reddipalayam. At the end of lease period, the excavated area will be
converted as water reservoir. Earth moving machinery like Hydraulic excavators,
Tippers, Drill machine, Dozers, etc. will be deployed in the process of mining. Total
water requirement for the project is 30 KLD, which will be sourced from Ground water
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 5 of 77
or mine sump as and when developed. Total Manpower requirement for the project is
50 persons. The Committee noted that Mine Plan has been approved by IBM, vide
letter 01.08.2014 and the Public Hearing was held during 02.08.2014 i.e. prior to
approval of the Mine Plan. Thus the Public Notice was issued and the Public was
informed about the Mining Proposal with a draft Mine Plan only. In this context, PP
vide letter dated 29.01.2015 has submitted the undertaking that the draft mine plan
and approved plan are consistent and in synchronization with each other.
Project Proponent reported that no National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere
Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant Reserves exist within 10 km of the mine
lease area. One Reserved Forests exist within 10 km radius of mine site. One
Schedule-I species is reported in the Buffer zone. Schedule-I species specific
conservation Plan duly approved by the Chief Wild Life Warden needs to be submitted
with budgetary provisions.
The baseline data was collected during Sumer Season 2013 (March - May). All the
parameters were within permissible limits. The Public Hearing was held on 2nd August
2014 at 11:00 am at the mine site and presided over by Thiru. B Ravindran, District
Revenue Officer of Ariyalur. The representative of Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
was also present. The Committee discussed the issues raised during Public Hearing
which inter-alia, included, socio- economic development viz. infrastructural
development, Health, Education etc.; Drinking water supply, environment related
issues, employment, Road & Transportation etc. As per the villager’s requirements the
company would take care of socio-economic development under Corporate Social
Responsibility, Environmental Mitigation measures will be undertaken.
Total cost of the Project is Rs. 250 Lakhs. Proponent has earmarked Rs. 20 Lakhs
for Environmental Protection Measures as Capital Cost and Rs. 7.5 Lakhs per annum
as recurring cost. Project Proponent reported that there is no Court case pending
against the Project.
The Committee, after detailed deliberations, recommended the Proposal for
environmental clearance for Mining of Limestone for the proposed production capacity
of 0.5 million TPA (ROM) of Limestone. Further the Proponent should furnish (i)
Conservation Plan for Schedule-I species duly approved by the Chief Wildlife
Warden along with necessary budgetary provision; and (ii) Furnish
clarification regarding receipt of EC application from M/s UltraTech against
already granted mining lease in favour of M/s Graism with additional specific
conditions as:-
(i) All top soil available in the lease area should be scrapped and used before rainy season
in a already identified green belt area as a measure to conserve germplasm of the top
soil;
(ii) Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and Periodical
medical examination of the workers engaged in the Project and maintain records
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 6 of 77
accordingly; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some ailments
like BP, diabetes, habitual smoking, etc. shall be undertaken once in six months and
necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly. The Recommendations of
National Institute for ensuring good occupational environment for mine workers shall
be implemented; The prevention measure for burns, malaria and provision of anti-
snake venom including all other paramedical safeguards may be ensured before
initiating the mining activities;
(iii) Implementation of Action Plan on the issues raised during the Public Hearing shall be
ensured. The PP shall complete all the tasks as per the Action Plan submitted with
budgetary provisions during the Public Hearing held on 02.08.2014;
(iv) The mining operations shall be restricted to above ground water table and it should
not intersect groundwater table. In case of working below ground water table, prior
approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Central
Ground Water Authority shall be obtained, for which a detailed hydro-geological study
shall be carried out; The Report on six monthly basis on changes in Ground water
level and quality shall be submitted to the Regional Office of the Ministry;
(v) The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC only will
be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through covered
trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded. Project
should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized pollution testing
centres;
(vi)There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater harvesting
measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director, Central
Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to augment ground
water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground Water Board;
(vii) Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other
transport roads shall be ensured; and
(viii) Washing of all transport vehicle should be done inside the mining lease.
Consideration of TOR Proposal
(2.3) Bauxite Mine of M/s Orient Abrasives Ltd. located at Village – Mewasa,
Taluka - Kalyanpur District – Jamnagar, Gujarat (25.8798 ha)-TORs
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting
and requested for deferment.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 7 of 77
RECONSIDERATION OF TOR PROPOSAL
(2.4) Sand Mining project of M/s Shri Vijay Kumar, Village- Sindhuria, District
Sonebhadra, U.P. (14.17 ha) (16667 Tonnes/annum).
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting
(2.5) Sand Mining project of M/s Shri Paras, Village- kargara, Tehsil –
Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra, U.P. (12.14 ha) (16667 Tonnes/annum).
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting
(2.6) Sand Mining project of M/s Ram Gopal, Village- Sindhuria, District
Sonebhadra, U.P. (14.17 ha) (16667 Tonnes/annum).
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting.
Day 1: 30th January, 2015 (Friday)
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects
(2.7). Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000
MTA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.8844 ha. by M/s Friends Crushers,
located at Kizhuparamba Village & Panchayat, Ernad Taluk, Malappuram
District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Friends Crushers is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor
Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 MTA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of
4.8844 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located
at Survey No. 51pt, 47/1pt, 49/2pt, Kizhuparamba Village & Panchayat, Ernad taluk,
Malappuram District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are
Latitude (N): 11016’05.74” to 11015’58.90” and Longitude (E): 76001’50.75” to
76001’38.23” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58A4. This is a category
“B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being
examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending
application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 8 of 77
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.8844 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.8844 ha lease area, about 4.5844 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.30
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed. It was
reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material
will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is
about 16 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well,
13 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher/M sand
Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond.
Ultimate working depth is 75 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table
level). Ground water table is 3.0 to 20.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 8 years (@2,00,000
TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. nil dated 14-01-2015 for mining of
stone in the MLA of 4.0644 ha. Also, it is informed that the project proponent possess
quarrying lease with an area of 0.8200 ha issued by the State Government of Kerala
vide letter no. 631/2007-09/8745/M3/2007 dated 27-11-2007. Eco-friendly Mining
Plan for mining of stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology
Department of the State Government vide letter no. DOM/M-118/15 dated 22-01-
2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. DOM/M-
3381/2014 dated 19-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27.02.2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 9 of 77
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.25 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 1.25 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate stating that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers
(v) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with list of RET species.
(2.8). Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,80,000
TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.5827 ha. by M/s Mallelil Industries
Pvt. Ltd., located at Village – Konnithazham, Panchayat – Konni, Taluk –
Konni (Formerly Kozhencherry), District - Pathanamthitta, Kerala (Consultant
-Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’
projects.
The proposal of M/s Mallelil Industries Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,80,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 4.5827 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 615/130, 615/54-3, 615/54-3-22, 615/52-1-27-28, 615/52-1-
27-28, 615/54-30, 615/61, 615/54-14, 615/54-5-2, 615/54, 615/54-5, 615/1-154,
615/52-1-28, 615/54-14-2, 615-53-1-9, 615/63-3, 615/54-5, 615/54-7, 615/54-14-2,
615/54-8, 615/54-1-34, 615/54-14-1, 615/52-6, 615/54-1-24, 615/54-7-29, 615/54-
6, 615/54-1-36, 615/54-1-219, 615/54-1-219, 615/54-16, 615/54-1-43-1 and
615/54-219 falling in Village – Konnithazham, Panchayat – Konni, Taluk – Konni
(Formerly Kozhencherry), District- Pathanamthitta, Kerala. The geographical co-
ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 09°15’38.11” to 09°15’ 27.62” and
Longitude (E): 76°51’28.45” to 76°51’19.47” and is covered by Survey of India
Toposheet No. 58C4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has
expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has
informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 10 of 77
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.5827 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.5827 ha lease area, about 4.5327 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.05
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed. It was
reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material
will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is
about 16 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well,
13 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher/M sand
Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond.
Ultimate working depth is 28.5 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table
level). Ground water table is 3.0 to 6.0 m. BGL. Life of mine is 14 years (@1,80,000
TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 140/DOPTA/M/15 dated 21-01-2015.
for mining of stone in the MLA of 2.4279 ha. Also the project proponent possess
quarrying lease for an area of 2.1548 ha. by the State Government of Kerala vide
letter no. 57/2006-07/3511/M3/2006 dated 03-05-2006. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for
mining of stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department
of the State Government vide letter no. 140/DOPTA/M/2015 dated 17-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no.
2258/DOPTA/M/2014, dated 11-12-2014.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 11 of 77
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-02-2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 5.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 5.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation
without EC;
(i) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(ii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iii) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.9).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,80,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.0 ha. by M/s Mallelil
Industries Pvt. Ltd., located at Iravon Village, Konni Panchayat, Konni Taluk
(formerly Kozhencherry Taluk), Pathanamthitta District, Kerala (Consultant -
Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’
projects.
The proposal of M/s Mallelil Industries Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,80,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 3.0 ha. The mine is a new Building Stone mining project. The mine is located
at Survey Nos. 275/1-50-3, 275/1-50-4, 275/1-50-5, 275/1-50-2, 270/1A2, 275/1-
50-2, 275/1-21-69, 275/1-57, 275/1-49, 275/1-52, 275/1-49, 275/1-52, 275/1-10,
276/1-4, 566/1D, 276/1-11, Iravon Village, Konni Panchayat, Konni Taluk (formerly
Kozhencherry Taluk), Pathanamthitta District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of
the lease area are Latitude (N): 09013’ 59.7” to 09
0 13’ 52.5” and Longitude (E): 76
0
51’ 47.8” to 760 51’ 56.8” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4. This
is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal
is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no
pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 12 of 77
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.0 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.0 ha lease area, about 1.743 ha area will be excavated
and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done and about 0.67 ha will be of water
reservoir. The remaining area of 0.58 ha which is left for stripping limits along the
periphery will also be developed with plantation and about 0.007 ha will be as
drainage. It was reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total
waste material will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water
requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced
from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit
(proposed Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from
storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 80 m MSL (mining will not intersect
ground water table level). Ground water table is 2.7 to 7.6 m. BGL. Life of mine is 4
years (@1,80,000 MTA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 139/DOPTA/M/15 dated 21-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.0 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. 139/DOPTA/M/2015 dated 17-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no.
2257/DOPTA/M/2014 dated 11-12-2014.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 13 of 77
The total cost of the project is Rs. 2.50 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 2.5 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations, recommended the Proposal for
environmental clearance for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with
proposed production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA (ROM) with additional specific
conditions:-
(i) Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and
Periodical medical examination of the workers engaged in the Project and maintain
records accordingly; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some
ailments like BP, diabetes, habitual smoking, etc. shall be undertaken once in six
months and necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly. The
Recommendations of National Institute for ensuring good occupational environment for
mine workers shall be implemented;
(ii) The mining operations shall be restricted to above ground water table and it
should not intersect groundwater table. In case of working below ground water table,
prior approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Central
Ground Water Authority shall be obtained, for which a detailed hydro-geological study
shall be carried out; The Report on six monthly basis on changes in Ground water level
and quality shall be submitted to the Regional Office of the Ministry;
(iii) The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC only will
be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through covered
trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded. Project
should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized pollution testing
centres;
(iv) There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater
harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director, Central
Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to augment ground
water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground Water Board;
(v) Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other
transport roads shall be ensured;
(vi) Washing of all transport vehicle should be done inside the mining lease;
(vii) “Environmental Clearance is subject to final outcome of any Court case relevant
to this project in Hon’ble Supreme Court, Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and Hon’ble
NGT or any other Court of Law” and
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 14 of 77
(viii) Project Proponent to carryout vegetation analysis of the area to ascertain
endemic and RET (Rare endangered and threatened) species to be affected due to
mining and take actions for multiplications and plantation of those species.
(2.10). Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,20,000
TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.2457 ha by M/s Valakkavu Granites
Pvt. Ltd., located at Mulayam Village, Nadathara Grama Panchayat, Thrissur
Taluk & District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Valakkavu Granites Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 3.2457 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 364/16/40, 364/10/42, 364/11/43, 364/16/11, 364/16/27,
364/16/25, 364/16/32, 364/16/8, 364/16/37, 364/16/48, 364/17/18, 364/17/16,
364/16/4/30, 364/16/5/5, 364/16/6/6, 364/16/7/7, 364/16/8/34, 364/16/9/38,
364/21/22P, 364/21P, Mulayam Village, Nadathara Grama Panchayat, Thrissur Taluk &
District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N):
10031’17.69” to 10031’10.28” and Longitude (E): 76018’34.54” to 76018’25.82” and is
covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58B4. This is a category “B” project as the
tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the
MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with
SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.2457 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.2457 ha lease area, about 2.8457 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.05
ha which will use for drainage/pond. It was reported by the project proponent that at
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 15 of 77
the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors.
The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which 2 KLD is for domestic
which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine
as well as ancillary unit (M Sand & Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes
and will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 80 m. MSL
(mining will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 0.5 to 5.0
m. BGL. Life of mine is 10 years (@1,20,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 132/C2/TDO/2015 dated 23-01-2015
for mining of stone in the MLA of 3.2457 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of
stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the
State Government vide letter no. 132/C2/TDO/2015 dated 23-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 18-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 18-02-2014 to 17-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 and as
per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in I.A.
Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 7.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 7.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation
without EC;
(i) The details of waste materials likely to be generated and the quantity of useful
construction materials likely to utilized;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 16 of 77
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
(v) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.11).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.3559 ha. by M/s P.V.
Granites, located at Moonnilavu Village & Panchayath, Meenachil Taluk,
Kottayam District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s P.V. Granites is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral)
with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.3559
ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located at
Survey Nos. 23/2, 23/2-1, 24, 24/1, 24/2 and 24/3 at Moonnilavu Village &
Panchayath, Meenachil Taluk, Kottayam District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates
of the lease area are Latitude (N): 09046’06.53” to 09048’01.54” and Longitude (E):
76048’07.12” to 76048’01.49” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4.
This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the
proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that
there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.3559 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.3559 ha lease area, about 2.8009 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.555
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed. It was
reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material
will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 17 of 77
about 16 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well,
13 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher/M sand
Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond.
Ultimate working depth is 530 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table
level). Ground water table is 4.0 to 5.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 4.5 years (@2,00,000
MTA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 92/DOY/ML/2015 dated 02-02-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.3559 ha. The Committee noted that the PP has
not obtained the approval of Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral from the Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government and was of the view that PP needs to submitted the approved
Mining Plan.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 23-
12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-03-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.05 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 1.05 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) The details of waste materials likely to be generated and the quantity of useful
construction materials likely to utilized;
(iii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 18 of 77
(iv) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(v) The health status report of workers;
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan; and
viii) Approved Ecofriendly mine plan from the State Government.
(2.12).Mining of Masonry Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,25,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.3394 ha by M/s Sunil
Kumar S., located at Village & Panchayat – Taluk - Kottarakkara, District -
Kollam, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The Proposal was deferred as the PP has not prepared the Ecofriendly Mine
Plan for mining of minor mineral.
(2.13).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,60,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.2047 ha. by M/s Avani
Metal Crusher, located at Anavoor Village, Kunnathunkal Panchayat,
Neyyattinkara Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala (Consultant -
Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’
projects.
The proposal of M/s Avani Metal Crusher is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor
Mineral) with production capacity of 1,60,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of
4.2047 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located
at Survey Nos. 265/6, 265/9, 266/1, 228/7, 228/20, 227/1-1 pt., 266/8 pt., 266/9
pt., 267/3 pt., 267/4 pt., 267/5 pt., 267/6 pt. , Anavoor Village, Kunnathunkal
Panchayat, Neyyattinkara Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala. The
geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 8°25'57.67" to
8°25'47.93" and Longitude (E): 77° 8'22.05" to 77° 8'12.81" and is covered by Survey
of India Toposheet No. 58H4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA,
Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project
Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this
proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 19 of 77
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.2047 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.2047 ha lease area, about 3.6547 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.52
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and an
area of about 0.03 ha will be of drainage/pond. It was reported by the project
proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road
construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which
2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 13 KLD for dust
suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher/M sand Unit) and 2 KLD
for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working
depth is 114 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water
table is 4.0 to 4.5 m BGL. Life of mine is 8.5 years (@1,60,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. nil dated 24-01-2015 for mining of
stone in the MLA of 0.3973 ha. Also, it is informed that the project proponent possess
quarrying lease with an area of 3.8074 ha issued by the State Government of Kerala
vide letter no. 878/2010-11/1595/M3/2011 dated 22-03-2011. Eco-friendly Mining
Plan for mining of stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology
Department of the State Government vide letter no. nil dated 24-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent reported that there is no quarry operating within 500 m of the proposed
mine lease area.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-02-2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 22 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.15).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.8686 ha by M/s
Aaraamam Rock (P) Ltd., located at Nellanad Village & Panchayat,
Nedumangadu Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala (Consultant -
Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’
projects.
The proposal of M/s Aaraamam Rock (P) Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 4.8686 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 65/1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 74/4, 5, 6, Nellanad Village &
Panchayat, Nedumangadu Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala. The
geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 08042’37.08” to
08042’27.28” and Longitude (E): 76053’55.38” to 76053’45.31” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 58D4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 23 of 77
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.8686 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.8686 ha lease area, about 4.8086 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.06
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed. It was
reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material
will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is
about 17 KLD in which 2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well,
12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher / M sand
Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond.
Ultimate working depth is 95 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table
level). Ground water table is 6.0 to 10.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 17 years (@2,00,000
TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. nil dated 24-01-2015 for mining of
stone in the MLA of 3.7436 ha Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone (minor
mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. nil dated 24-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent reported that there is no quarry operating within 500 m of the proposed
mine lease area.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 31-03-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 3.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 3.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 24 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.16).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,50,000
TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.4589 ha by M/s Raveendra Rock
Crushing Plant, located at Ezhumattoor Village & Panchayat, Mallappally
Taluk, Pathanamthitta District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services
Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Raveendra Rock Crushing Plant is for Mining of Building
Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,50,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine
Lease Area of 3.4589 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The
mine is located at Survey No. 138/7-2, 137/11, 139/11, 139/6, 138/8, 138/4, 139/3,
139/7-1, 139/7, 139/10, 137/12-2, 137/3, 137/7, 137/9, 137/12-1, 139/2-2, 139/2,
139/4, 139/5, Ezhumattoor Village & Panchayat, Mallappally Taluk, Pathanamthitta
District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitudes (N):
9025’54.72” to 9025’45.88” and Longitudes (E): 76042’24.74” to 76042’18.42” and is
covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4. This is a category “B” project as the
tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the
MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with
SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 25 of 77
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.4589 ha is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.4589 ha lease area, about 3.3289 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.07
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and the
remaining area of 0.06 ha will be left as undisturbed. It was reported by the project
proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road
construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which
2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust
suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for
plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working
depth is 82 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water
table is 2.0 to 5.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 6 years (@1,50,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate has been issued as Letter of
Intent by the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 160/DOPTA/M/15 dated 23-
01-2015 for mining of stone in the MLA of 3.4589 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for
mining of stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department
of the State Government vide letter no. 160/DOPTA/M/15 dated 28-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. 2282/DOPTA/M/2014 dated 17-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 02-05-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 10 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 10 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 26 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.17).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.9286 ha by M/s Ever-One
Properties India Pvt. Ltd. located at Neriyamangalam Village, Kavalangad
Panchayat, Kothamangalam Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala (Consultant -
Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’
projects.
The proposal of M/s Ever-One Properties India Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building
Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine
Lease Area of 4.9286 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The
mine is located at Survey Nos. 186/1A2, 186/1A/4/5, Neriyamangalam Village,
Kavalangad Panchayat, Kothamangalam Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala. The
geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 10° 2'9.10" to 10°
1'47.80" and Longitude (E): 76°43'32.27" to 76°43'23.92" and is covered by Survey of
India Toposheet No. 58B4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA,
Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project
Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this
proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 27 of 77
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.9286 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.9286 ha lease area, about 4.3786 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.50
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will be developed and an area of
about 0.05 ha will be use for drainage/pond. It was reported by the project proponent
that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction
vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for
domestic which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system
in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and
will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 39 m. MSL (mining
will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 1.0 to 4.0 m BGL.
Life of mine is 8.5 years (@2,00,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DEO/233/E2/15 dated 23-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 4.9286 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOE/233/E2/15 dated 24-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent reported that there is no quarry operating within 500 m of the proposed
mine lease area.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-02-2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc. inter-alia ordered that leases of
minor mineral including their renewal for an area of less than 5 ha will be granted by
the States / Union Territories only after getting environmental clearance (EC) from this
Ministry.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 3.72 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 3.72 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 28 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation
without EC;
(i) The details of waste materials likely to be generated and the quantity of useful
construction materials likely to utilized;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.18).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 2.8805 ha by M/s R.M.
Rocks & Sand Pvt. Ltd., located at Maneed Village & Panchayat, Muvattupuzha
Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt.
Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s R.M. Rocks & Sand (P) Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 2.8805 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 178/6, 178/7A, 178/7B3, 178/7B2, 178/7B1, 179/1-1,
179/8A1, 179/8A2, 179/8B1, 179/8B2, 179/8B3, 179/8A3, 180/1-1, 180/1-2, 183/2-1
& 180/2-5, Maneed Village & Panchayat, Muvattupuzha Taluk, Ernakulam District,
Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 9°54’58.36”
to 9°54’52.42” and Longitude (E): 76°27’27.67” to 76°27’18.04” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 29 of 77
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 2.8805 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 2.8805 ha lease area, about 1.2505 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done and about 1.63 ha will be of
water reservoir. It was reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage,
total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total
water requirement is about 16 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be
sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as
ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced
from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 40 m. MSL (mining will not intersect
ground water table level). Ground water table is 2.0 to 10.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 8
years (@1,00,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOE/238/E2/2015 dated 19-01-2015
for mining of stone in the MLA of 2.8805 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of
stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the
State Government vide letter no. DOE/238/E2/2015 dated 23-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. DOE/238/E2/2015 dated 19-01-2015.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 28-03-2014 to 27-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 6.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 6.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 30 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Production details since 27.02.2012 and complete information under S.No. 40 of
the Annexure including fresh duly filled in Annexure-I;
(iv) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(v) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.19).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,25,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.3366 ha by M/s
Valiakalathil Rock Crushing Unit located at Pampady Village & Panchayat,
Kottayam Taluk, Kottayam District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro
Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Valiakalathil Rock Crushing Unit is for Mining of Building
Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,25,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine
Lease Area of 3.3366 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The
mine is located at Survey Nos. 431/3-1 pt., 431/3-2 pt., 436/4-1, 436/5, 438/4 pt.,
438/5 pt., 438/6 pt., 438/9 pt., Pampady Village & Panchayat, Kottayam Taluk,
Kottayam District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude
(N): 09032’28.66” to 09032’19.48” and Longitude (E): 76040’13.15” to 76040’04.35”
and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4. This is a category “B” project
as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the
MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with
SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 31 of 77
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.3366 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.3366 ha lease area, about 2.9866 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.31
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and an
area of 0.04 ha will be of drainage/pond. It was reported by the project proponent that
at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors.
The estimated total water requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic
which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine
as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be
sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 57 m. MSL (mining will not
intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 2.0 to 5.0 m BGL. Life of
mine is 6 years (@1,25,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 144/DOY/ML/2015 dated 28-01-2015
for mining of stone in the MLA of 2.6895 ha. Also the project proponent possess
quarrying lease for an area of 0.6471 ha by the State Government of Kerala vide letter
no. 531/2014-15/10972/M3/2014 dated 04-11-2014. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for
mining of stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department
of the State Government vide letter no. 144/DOY/ML/2015 dated 28-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 15-
12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-02-2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 5.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 5.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 32 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.20).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.7981 ha by M/s Pynadath
Granites Pvt. Ltd., located at Kuttichira Village, Kodassery Panchayath,
Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services
Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Pynadath Granites Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 4.7981 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 2066/1, 2067/2, 2063, 2057, 2056/2, 3, 2067/1, Kuttichira
Village, Kodassery Panchayath, Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, Kerala. The
geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 10020’30.35” to
10020’20.94” and Longitude (E): 76026’08.58” to 76025’56.34” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 58B4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 33 of 77
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.7981 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.7981 ha lease area, about 4.1981 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.51
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed with
plantation and an area of about 0.09 ha will be as drainage/pond. It was reported by
the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to
road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 6 KLD in
which 2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 2 KLD for dust
suppression system and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm
water pond. Ultimate working depth is 45 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground
water table level). Ground water table is 2.0 to 5.0 m. BGL. Life of mine is 11 years
(@2,00,000 MTA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 100/C2/TDO/15 dated 19-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 4.7981 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. 100/C2/TDO/15 dated 22-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. 2992/C2/TDO/2014 dated 10-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 15-02-2014 to 14-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 2.8007 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 2.80 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 34 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.21).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,50,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.6849 ha by M/s Kottakkal
Granite Industries Pvt. Ltd. located at Village & Panchayat Anad,
Nedumangad Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay
Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Kottakkal Granite Industries Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of
Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,50,000 TPA of Stone in
the Mine Lease Area of 3.6849 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining
project. The mine is located at Survey No. 167/3, 167/4, 164/4-1, 167/5-1, 167/6,
167/7, 167/8, 177/2, 177/2-1, 178/1, 178/3-2, 178/5, 178/10, Village & Panchayat
Anad, Nedumangad Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala. The geographical co-
ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 08038’02.68” to 08037’54.35” and
Longitude (E): 76059’07.12” to 76058’55.77” and is covered by Survey of India
Toposheet No. 58D4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has
expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has
informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 35 of 77
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.6849 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.6849 ha lease area, about 3.4649 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.20
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and
about 0.02 ha area will be of drainage/pond. It was reported by the project proponent
that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction
vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for
domestic which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system
in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and
will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 84 m. MSL (mining
will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 2.0 to 4.0 m BGL.
Life of mine is 9 years (@1,50,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 3363/DOT/ML/2015 dated 08-01-2015
for mining of stone in the MLA of 3.6849 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of
stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the
State Government vide letter no. 3363/DOT/ML/2015 dated 24-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 24-
01-2015.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 18-06-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 2.30 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 2.3 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 36 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:- -
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.22).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 2.9302 ha by quarry of Mr.
V.K. Benny, located at Kolayad Village & Panchayat, Thalassery Taluk, Kannur
District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of Mr. V.K. Benny is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral)
with production capacity of 1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 2.9302
ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located at
Survey No. 21/1A1, Kolayad Village & Panchayat, Thalassery Taluk, Kannur District,
Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 11052’11.75”
to 11052’04.16” and Longitude (E): 75042’55.08 to 75042’41.60” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 49M4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 37 of 77
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 2.9302 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 2.9302 ha lease area, about 2.1102 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.76
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and an
area of 0.06 ha will be use of drainage/pond. It was reported by the project proponent
that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction
vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 6 KLD in which 2 KLD is for
domestic which would be sourced from open well, 2 KLD for dust suppression system
and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond.
Ultimate working depth is 65 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table
level). Ground water table is 1.0 to 3.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 5 years (@1,20,000
TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOC/M-3722/14 dated 31-12-2014 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 2.9302 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOC/M-132/15 dated 21-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. DOC/M-
3417/14 dated 05-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 19-12-2013 to 18-12-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.0 Crore. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 1 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 38 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.23).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.7072 ha by M/s Kilinakod
Rock Products Pvt. Ltd. located at Village & Panchayat Oorakam, Thirurangadi
Taluk, Malappuram District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt.
Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Kilinakod Rock Products Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building
Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine
Lease Area of 4.7072 ha. The mine is a new Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 24/3 Pt., 25 Pt., Village & Panchayat Oorakam, Thirurangadi
Taluk, Malappuram District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area
are Latitude (N): 11004’57.19” to 11004’45.30” and Longitude (E): 76000’39.45” to
76000’33.07” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58A4. This is a category
“B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being
examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending
application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 39 of 77
The total Mining Lease area of 4.7072 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.7072 ha lease area, about 4.3572 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.30
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed with
plantation and about 0.05 ha will be as drainage. It was reported by the project
proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road
construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is 17 KLD in which 2 KLD
is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 13 KLD for dust suppression
system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher / M sand Unit) and 2 KLD for
plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working
depth is 120 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water
table is 2.0 to 7.0 BGL. Life of mine is 11 years (@2,00,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOM/M-113/15 dated 22-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 4.7072 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOM/M-113/15 dated 22-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. DOM/M-3200/14 dated 04-12-2014.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.0 Crore. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 1.0 Lakh per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee deliberated at length and recommended the Proposal for
environmental clearance for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with
proposed production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA (ROM). Further, the Committee
also suggested the following specific conditions:-
(i) Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and Periodical
medical examination of the workers engaged in the Project and maintain records
accordingly; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some ailments
like BP, diabetes, habitual smoking, etc. shall be undertaken once in six months and
necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly. The Recommendations of
National Institute for ensuring good occupational environment for mine workers shall
be implemented;
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 40 of 77
(ii) The mining operations shall be restricted to above ground water table and it should
not intersect groundwater table. In case of working below ground water table, prior
approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Central
Ground Water Authority shall be obtained, for which a detailed hydro-geological study
shall be carried out; The Report on six monthly basis on changes in Ground water level
and quality shall be submitted to the Regional Office of the Ministry;
(iii) The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC only will
be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through covered
trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded. Project
should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized pollution testing
centres;
(iv) There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater
harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director, Central
Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to augment ground
water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground Water Board;
(v) Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other
transport roads shall be ensured;
(vi) Washing of all transport vehicle should be done inside the mining lease;
(vii) “Environmental Clearance is subject to final outcome of any Court case relevant
to this project in Hon’ble Supreme Court, Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and Hon’ble
NGT or any other Court of Law”;
(viii) Survey of existing vegetation and ecological status to be made based on scientific
survey and RET species conservation plan may be implemented; and
(ix) Land use change permission certificate may be obtained from the concerned
Authority.
(2.24).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 2.6565 ha by M/s Safa Stone
Crusher, located at Thazhakode Village, Mukkam Panchayat, Taluk & District
Kozhikode, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Safa Stone Crusher is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor
Mineral) with production capacity of 1,00,000 MTA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of
2.6565 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located
at Survey Nos. 147/2A2, 149/2B1, Thazhakode Village, Mukkam Panchayat, Taluk &
District Kozhikode, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are
Latitude (N): 11020’14.77” to 11020’08.61” and Longitude (E): 75058’49.70” to
75058’41.61” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 49M4. This is a
category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 41 of 77
being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no
pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 2.6565 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 2.6565 ha lease area, about 2.2065 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.40
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed and an
area of 0.05 ha will be use for drainage. It was reported by the project proponent that
at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors.
The estimated total water requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic
which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine
as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be
sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 27 m. MSL (mining will not
intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 1.0 to 4.0 m BGL. Life of
mine is 5 years (@1,00,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOZ/M-130/15 dated 29-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 2.6565 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOZ/M-130/15 dated 29-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 05-12-2014.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 42 of 77
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 11-12-2013 to 10-12-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 0.60 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 0.60 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers; and
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan.
(2.25).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
2,00,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.74 ha by M/s Pullipadam
Metal and Metal Sand Pvt. Ltd. located at Pullipadam Village, Mampad
Panchayat, Nilambur Taluk, Malappuram District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay
Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur) -Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Pullipadam Metal and Metal Sand Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of
Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 2,00,000 TPA of Stone in
the Mine Lease Area of 4.74 ha. The mine is a new Building Stone mining project. The
mine is located at Survey No. 1 pt., Pullipadam Village, Mampad Panchayat, Nilambur
Taluk, Malappuram District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area
are Latitude (N): 11015’00.91” to 11008’51.54” and Longitude (E): 76008’57.28” to
76008’48.02” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58A4. This is a category
“B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being
examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending
application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 43 of 77
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.74 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.74 ha lease area, about 4.39 ha area will be excavated
and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.33 ha which is
left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed with plantation and
an area of about 0.02 ha will be as drainage/pond. It was reported by the project
proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road
construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which
2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust
suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for
plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working
depth is 102 m MSL (mining will not intersect ground water table level). Ground water
table is 0.6 to 3.5 m BGL. Life of mine is 15 years (@2,00,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 3437/14 dated 31-12-2014 for mining
of stone in the MLA of 4.74 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone (minor
mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOM/M-99/2015 dated 16-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. nil dated 03-12-2014.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 1.0 Crore. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 44 of 77
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 1 Lakh per annum has been earmarked towards
Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has informed that
there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee deliberated at length the information submitted by Project
Proponent and recommended the Proposal for environmental clearance for
Mining of Masonry Stone (Minor Mineral) with proposed production capacity
of 2,00,000 TPA (ROM). Further, the Committee also suggested the following
specific conditions:-
(i) Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and Periodical
medical examination of the workers engaged in the Project and maintain records
accordingly; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some ailments
like BP, diabetes, habitual smoking, etc. shall be undertaken once in six months and
necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly. The Recommendations of
National Institute for ensuring good occupational environment for mine workers shall
be implemented;
(ii) The mining operations shall be restricted to above ground water table and it
should not intersect groundwater table. In case of working below ground water table,
prior approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Central
Ground Water Authority shall be obtained, for which a detailed hydro-geological study
shall be carried out; The Report on six monthly basis on changes in Ground water level
and quality shall be submitted to the Regional Office of the Ministry;
(iii) The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC only will
be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through covered
trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded. Project
should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized pollution testing
centres;
(iv) There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater
harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director, Central
Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to augment ground
water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground Water Board;
(v) Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other
transport roads shall be ensured;
(vi) Washing of all transport vehicle should be done inside the mining lease;
(vii) “Environmental Clearance is subject to final outcome of any Court case relevant
to this project in Hon’ble Supreme Court, Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and Hon’ble
NGT or any other Court of Law”; and
(viii) Survey of existing vegetation and ecological status to be made based on scientific
survey and RET species conservation plan may be implemented.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 45 of 77
(2.26).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,90,000
TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.7065 ha by M/s Edathadan Granites
Pvt. Ltd. located at Kodassery Village, Mattathur Panchayat, Ombathungal
Desam, Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro
Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Edathadan Granites Pvt. Ltd. is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,90,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 4.7065 ha. The mine is a new Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey Nos. 1270/4, 1270/5, 1270/7, 1270/8, 1271/2, 1271/3, 1271/4,
1273/1, 1273/2, 1272/1, Kodassery Village, Mattathur Panchayat, Ombathungal
Desam, Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of
the lease area are Latitude (N): 10021’54.16” to 10021’43.68” and Longitude (E):
76021’37.84” to 76021’29.53” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58B4.
This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the
proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that
there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.7065 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.7065 ha lease area, about 4.6265 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.08
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed with
plantation. It was reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total
waste material will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water
requirement is about 17 KLD in which 2 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced
from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine as well as ancillary unit
(Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes and will be sourced from storm water
pond. Ultimate working depth is 52 m. MSL (mining will not intersect ground water
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 46 of 77
table level). Ground water table is 0.5 to 5.0 m BGL. Life of mine is 13 years
(@1,90,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 99/C2/TDO/2015 dated 19-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 4.7065 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. 99/C2/TDO/2015 dated 23-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. 2958/C2/TDO/2014 dated 05-12-2014.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 3.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 3.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee deliberated at length the information submitted by Project
Proponent and recommended the Proposal for environmental clearance for
Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with proposed production capacity
of 1,90,000 TPA (ROM) subject to details of production since 27.2.2012.
Further, the Committee also suggested the following stipulations:-
(i) Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and Periodical
medical examination of the workers engaged in the Project and maintain records
accordingly; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some ailments
like BP, diabetes, habitual smoking, etc. shall be undertaken once in six months and
necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly. The Recommendations of
National Institute for ensuring good occupational environment for mine workers shall
be implemented;
(ii) The mining operations shall be restricted to above ground water table and it should
not intersect groundwater table. In case of working below ground water table, prior
approval of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Central
Ground Water Authority shall be obtained, for which a detailed hydro-geological study
shall be carried out; The Report on six monthly basis on changes in Ground water level
and quality shall be submitted to the Regional Office of the Ministry;
(iii) The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC only will
be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through covered
trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded. Project
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 47 of 77
should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized pollution testing
centres;
(iv) There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater
harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director, Central
Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to augment ground
water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground Water Board;
(v) Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other
transport roads shall be ensured;
(vi) Washing of all transport vehicle should be done inside the mining lease; and
(vii) “Environmental Clearance is subject to final outcome of any Court case relevant
to this project in Hon’ble Supreme Court, Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and Hon’ble
NGT or any other Court of Law”.
However, the Committee observed that there are four leases of the PP
adjacent to the proposed mine which are working without EC. The Committee
sought details of production and reasons of violating the provisions of the EIA
Notification, 2006.
(2.27). Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,60,000
TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.9662 ha by Mr. Nizamudheen K.S.
located at Thirumarady Village & Panchayat, Muvattupuzha Taluk, Ernakulam
District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-
Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of Mr. Nizamudheen K.S. is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor
Mineral) with production capacity of 1,60,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of
3.9662 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located
at Survey No. 567/1-2, 567/2B2, 568/1-1, 568/2-2, 569/1-3, 569/1-5, 567/2A,
567/2B1, Thirumarady Village & Panchayat, Muvattupuzha Taluk, Ernakulam District,
Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 09055’28.50”
to 09055,21.57” and Longitude (E): 76033’45.62” to 76033’34.34” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 58C4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 48 of 77
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.9662 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.9662 ha lease area, about 3.0662 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.90
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will also be developed. It was
reported by the project proponent that at the conceptual stage, total waste material
will be sold to road construction vendors. The estimated total water requirement is
about 5 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic which would be sourced from open well, 2
KLD for dust suppression system in mine and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be
sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 90 m. MSL (mining will not
intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 3.0 to 6.0 m BGL. Life of
mine is 12 years (@1,60,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOE/234/E2/15 dated 17-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.9662 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOE/234/E2/15 dated 21-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no.
DOE/5543/E2/14 dated 03-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 17-05-2014 to 16-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 2.25 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 2.25 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 49 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers;
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan; and
viii) Details of CSIR Plan for improving the livelihood status of the surrounding
population.
(2.28).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,60,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.0 ha by Mr. C.G. George
located at Kolavallur Village, Kunnothuparamba Grama Panchayat, Thalassery
Taluk, Kannur District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of Mr. C.G. George is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral)
with production capacity of 1,60,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 4.0 ha.
The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located at Survey
Nos. 86/2, 87, 88/2, 88/3, 88/1, 89/2B, 147/2, 139/1 Kolavallur Village,
Kunnothuparamba Grama Panchayat, Thalassery Taluk, Kannur District, Kerala. The
geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are Latitude (N): 11046’48.36” to
11046’37.93” and Longitude (E): 75037’25.27” to 75037’15.50” and is covered by
Survey of India Toposheet No. 49M4. This is a category “B” project as the tenure of
SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC.
Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC
for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 50 of 77
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 4.0 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 4.0 ha lease area which will be excavated and will be
reclaimed & plantation will be done. It was reported by the project proponent that at
the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors.
The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which 2 KLD is for domestic
which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine
as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes and will be
sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 70 m. MSL (mining will not
intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 1.0 to 3.0 m BGL. Life of
mine is 13 years (@1,60,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. DOC/M-133/15 dated 21-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.4081 ha. Also the project proponent possess quarrying
lease for an area of 0.5919 ha. by the State Government of Kerala vide letter no.
664/2004-05/422/M3/05 dated 13-01-2005. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of
stone (minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the
State Government vide letter no. DOC/M-133/15 dated 21-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. DOC/M-3406/14 dated 04-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 27-02-2012 to 31-03-2014 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 4.0 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 4.0 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 51 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers;
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan and
viii) Details of CSIR Plan for improving the livelihood status of the surrounding
population.
(2.29).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.1542 ha by Mr. V.P.
Shareef located at Payyanad Village, Manjeri Municipality, Ernad Taluk,
Malappuram District, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of Mr. V.P. Shareef is for Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral)
with production capacity of 1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.1542
ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is located at
Survey No. 413/4A Pt., Payyanad Village, Manjeri Municipality, Ernad Taluk,
Malappuram District, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the lease area are
Latitude (N): 11007’28.17” to 11007’21.26” and Longitude (E): 76010’17.51” to
76010’06.63” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58A4. This is a category
“B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the proposal is being
examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that there is no pending
application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is not required. The EAC viewed that these prescribed exemptions and
recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 vide para
Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides that “In case of
Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application
seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the concerned State level
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 52 of 77
activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of Environmental
Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project.” The
Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be prepared in
the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of negligible impact
of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.1542 ha which is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.1542 ha lease area, about 2.9042 ha area will be
excavated and will be reclaimed & plantation will be done. The remaining area of 0.23
ha which is left for stripping limits along the periphery will be developed and an area of
0.02 ha will be use of drainage. It was reported by the project proponent that at the
conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors. The
estimated total water requirement is about 15 KLD in which 1 KLD is for domestic
which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in mine
as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 2 KLD for plantation purposes and will be
sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 65 m. MSL (mining will not
intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 2.0 to 4.5 m BGL. Life of
mine is 10 years (@1,20,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 3435/2014 dated 31-12-2014 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.1542 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. DOM/M-116/15 dated 22-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. There
is no quarry operating within 500 m. of the proposed mine lease area which is duly
authenticated by the Mining Department of the State Govt. vide letter no. DOM/M-
3221/14 dated 05-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 17-03-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 4.5 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. Minimum an amount of Rs. 4.5 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 53 of 77
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers;
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan; and
viii) Details of CSIR Plan for improving the livelihood status of the surrounding
population.
(2.30).Mining of Building Stone (Minor Mineral) with production capacity of
1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease Area of 3.0352 ha by M/s Blue
Mountain Granites located at Village – Vellikulangara, Panchayat – Mattathur,
Taluk – Chalakudy, District- Thrissur, Kerala (Consultant - Enkay Enviro
Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur)-Consideration of Category ‘B’ projects.
The proposal of M/s Blue Mountain Granites is for Mining of Building Stone
(Minor Mineral) with production capacity of 1,20,000 TPA of Stone in the Mine Lease
Area of 3.0352 ha. The mine is an existing Building Stone mining project. The mine is
located at Survey No. 1982 falling in Village – Vellikulangara, Panchayat – Mattathur,
Taluk – Chalakudy, District- Thrissur, Kerala. The geographical co-ordinates of the
lease area are Latitude (N): 10021’57.69” to 10021’49.02” and Longitude (E):
76025’09.87” to 76025’04.05” and is covered by Survey of India Toposheet No. 58B4.
This is a category “B” project as the tenure of SEIAA, Kerala has expired and the
proposal is being examined in the MoEF&CC. Project Proponent has informed that
there is no pending application with SEIAA/SEAC for this proposal.
The Committee was informed by Project Proponent that they have submitted
Form-1 and Pre-feasibility Report online treating the project as B category as per the
EIA Notification, 2006. Environmental Impact assessment as well as Public
Consultation is are not required. The EAC noted viewed that these prescribed
exemptions and recommendations are based on provisions of the EIA Notification,
2006 vide para Clause 7.0 sub clause 7(i) I under stage (1) – Screening it provides
that “In case of Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of
an application seeking prior Environmental Clearance made in Form-1 by the
concerned State level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or
not the project or activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 54 of 77
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of
Environmental Clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the
project.” The Committee felt that TOR is not required, nor any formal EIA/ EMP is to be
prepared in the instant case nor any Public Hearing is to be conducted in light of
negligible impact of the Project activity on Environment.
The total Mining Lease area of 3.0352 ha is private land. No forest land is
involved. Mining will be carried out through semi-mechanized open-cast method using
drilling, blasting of small diameter holes and loading of mineral by tyre mounted
excavator. Out of the total 3.0352 ha lease area which will be excavated and will be
reclaimed & plantation will be done. It was reported by the project proponent that at
the conceptual stage, total waste material will be sold to road construction vendors.
The estimated total water requirement is about 17 KLD in which 2 KLD is for domestic
use which would be sourced from open well, 12 KLD for dust suppression system in
mine as well as ancillary unit (Crusher Unit) and 3 KLD for plantation purposes and will
be sourced from storm water pond. Ultimate working depth is 40 m MSL (mining will
not intersect ground water table level). Ground water table is 0.5 to 5.0 m BGL. Life of
mine is 13 years (@1,20,000 TPA).
Project Proponent has informed that a certificate issued as Letter of Intent by
the State Government of Kerala vide letter no. 127/C2/TDO/15 dated 21-01-2015 for
mining of stone in the MLA of 3.0352 ha. Eco-friendly Mining Plan for mining of stone
(minor mineral) has been approved by Mines and Geology Department of the State
Government vide letter no. 127/C2/TDO/15 dated 22-01-2015.
Project Proponent reported that there is no National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary,
Habitat for Migratory Birds, Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve, Bio-sphere Reserve
located within 10 km radius of the mine lease. Project Proponent has informed that the
mine site is not located in the Critically Polluted area as identified by CPCB etc. Project
Proponent has submitted the details of other mines including lease area located within
500m of the mine lease area duly authenticated by the Mining Department of the
State Govt. vide letter no. 2954/C2/TDO/2014 dated 17-12-2014.
Project Proponent has submitted the Year wise production details of minerals
since 27.02.2012 and the Committee noted that it is a case of violation as the
mining has been done during 28-11-2014 to 09-01-2015 without prerequisite
environmental clearance as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006
and as per the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 27.02.2012 in
I.A. Nos.12-13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009 titled
Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. etc.
The total cost of the project is Rs. 0.90 Crores. The Project Proponent has
earmarked Rs 9 Lakhs per annum as recurring cost towards Environmental protection
measures. A Minimum amount of Rs. 0.90 Lakhs per annum has been earmarked
towards Socio-economic Welfare measures for the nearby village. Proponent has
informed that there is no court case /litigation pending against the project.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 55 of 77
The Committee after detailed deliberations concluded that the operation of the
project continued without valid EC. The Committee sought the following
additional information:-
(i) An explanation as to why the proponent continued violation without EC;
(ii) A certificate that the mining operation has been stopped;
(iii) Certificate from Authority concerned about location of any other mining lease in
operation within 500 meter;
(iv) The health status report of workers;
vii) The information about existing vegetation and ecological status on the basis
scientific survey along with their conservation plan; and
viii) Details of CSIR Plan for improving the livelihood status of the surrounding
population.
CONSIDERATION OF TOR PROPOSAL
(2.31). Laterite Mine of M/s S. Sobhan Babu located at Village- Velangi, Mandal-
Sankavaram, District East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh (54.233ha).
The Mine Lease area is located in Unsurveyed Hill Portion Avelthi H/o Velangi
(V) Sankavaram (M) East Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh. The Mine Lease area
has a Latitudes in between 17°26’36.79” to 17°27’25.26”N and Longitudes in
between 82°17’26.9” to 82°18’14.7”E. The mine will be operated by open cast
semi mechanized mining by using heavy capacity ripper dozer and no blasting is
proposed. The proposed production is 5,50,000 tons of laterite per year. The
lessee, had applied for grant of mining lease for Laterite over an extent of 54.233
Hectares in Unsurveyed Hill Portion of Government waste land located at Avelthi
H/o Velangi (V) Sankavaram (M) East Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh. Based
on the recommendation of the Director of Mines and Geology, the Government of
Andhra Pradesh have proposed to grant Mining lease for laterite vide G.O. M.S. No:
196 / MIII/2008-1, dated: 12.08.2009. The mining plan was approved by Zonal
Joint Director of Mines & Geology, Govt. of A.P. and their approval letter no.
128/M/2009 Dated 27/05/2009.
The proposal was earlier considered by the Reconstituted Expert Appraisal
Committee in its Meeting held during 26-27 October 2009 for determination of TOR.
The TOR to the project were prescribed on 06.11.2009 vide letter no. J-
11015/261/2009.IA-II (M). The project proponent could not submit the EIA/EMP
report as public hearing was not conducted by the State Government. On expiry of
TOR project proponent applied afresh for TOR.
The PP reported that there are no National Parks, Wildlife sanctuaries,
Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/ Elephant Reserves etc. within the
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 56 of 77
study area (10 km radius of Mining Lease boundary). The water requirement for the
proposed mining activity will be for Dust suppression purpose: 40 KLD, Domestic
purpose: 1.0 KLD and Greenbelt purpose: 9 KLD. It is anticipated that no sub grade
material will be generated. It is reported by the project proponent that there is no
court case / litigation pending against the project. The estimated cost of the Project
is Rs. 100 lakhs.
The Committee after detailed discussion recommended for the TOR as per
Annexure-I.
(2.32). Colour Granite Mine of M/s PSR Granites Private Limited located at
Village- Baddipally, Mandal- Karimnagar, district- Karimnagar, Telangana
(1.240 ha).
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting.
RECONSIDERATION OF EC PROPOSAL
(2.33). Iron Ore Beneficiation Plant of M/s Divyajyothi Steel Ltd., village
Taranagar Sandur Taluk, Distt Bellary, Karnataka (20.48ha) (Iron Ore
Beneficiation of 0.6 MTPA throughput pelletization of 0.4 MTPA
throughput) (Global Environment & Mining Services).
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the
meeting and also no document was circulated to the Members by PP.
(2.34). Pachayra Sand Mining in River Yamuna of M/s Arvind Dhawan Budh
Singh located at Village-Pachayara, Tehsil-Ghaziabad, District Ghaziabad,
U.P. (8.91ha)(1.6 lakh TPA)(Consultant: Grass Roots Research & Creation
India (P) Ltd.)
The proposal is for opencast Sand Mining with proposed production of
1,60,000 TPA located at Village: Pachayra, Tehsil: Ghaziabad, District Ghaziabad,
Uttar Pradesh. The co-ordinates are: Latitudes: 28°47’55.035” N to 28°47’34.707”
N and Longitudes: 77°12’25.998” E to 77°12’24.464” E.
The proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its
meeting held on 15th May, 2013 to determine the Terms of Reference (TOR) for
undertaking detailed EIA study. The TORs were issued by MoEF vide letter no. J-
11015/99/2013-IA.II (M) dated 31st July, 2013. The proponent submitted its
application for seeking environmental clearance after conducting public hearing to
the Ministry on 19th September, 2014.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 57 of 77
The lease was granted to Mr Arvind Dhawan & Mr. Budh Singh on 25.07.2005
for a period of three years. However, mining was stopped for a period of 322 days,
for which lessees has appealed to consider the fact and to provide the lapse period
for mining. District Magistrate, Ghaziabad vide letter dated 10.10.2012 has granted
the lapse period of 322 days to the lessee w.e.f. 10.10.12.
The mine plan is approved by Directorate of Geology and Mining, U.P dated
17.06.2014. The entire mine lease area lies on the river bed. The mining process is
opencast river bed mining of minor minerals. Before the mining process, lease area
will be demarcated with wooden planks. Mining is proposed to be carried out in
semi mechanized method i.e. excavation will be done manually but excavators will
be used for loading purpose. Permission for this has been granted by Directorate
General of Mines Safety, Ghaziabad region, Ghaziabad, vide Letter No.
S29024/GR/UP/GZB/0001/
PERM/413 dated 04.02.2013. 50 m of width of the river for bank protection & 10 m
from the stream flow as stability zone. Drilling and blasting is not required. During
the entire lease period, the deposit will be worked from the top surface to 1.5 m bgl
or above the ground water level whichever comes first.
No solid waste will be generated during mining as the entire material is saleable.
Total water requirement of the area is 1.66 KLD. Water will be obtained from the
nearby area from the nearby sources. At no point of time, mining will intersect with
ground water level. It was reported by the PP that there is no protected area
located within the 10 km radius of the mine.
Baseline studies were carried out during winter season 2013-2014 (October,
2013 to December, 2013). The public consultation for this project was held on 10th
July, 2014 at village- Pachayra, Tehsil-Ghaziabad, Dist- Ghaziabad. Action plan with
budgetary provision for the points raised during Public Hearing are incorporated in
the Project Report. The cost of the project is Rs 25 Lakhs and Rs 5.3 lakh (Capital)
is allotted for EMP implementation.
The proposal was considered by the EAC in its meeting held during November
24-25, 2014. Based on the presentation made and discussions held, the Committee
desired that the Proponent shall furnish the following information/clarification for
further consideration by the Committee:-
(i) The lease deed documents shall be submitted the clarification may be
submitted about the validity of lease as Collector has granted the lapse
period of 322 days to the lessee w.e.f. 10.10.12.
(ii) The issues related to the disaster management and safety shall be
addressed.
(iii) Mine site is located in the critically polluted area, therefore; comments of
SPCB shall be provided with respect to location of mine site and its impact on
the pollution load of the area.
(iv) The mine site is located in the CPA however, the value of PM10, SOx, NOx
are very low. An explanation on this shall be provided.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 58 of 77
(v) One month baseline data shall be collected and reports shall be submitted.
(vi) Revised Questionnaire shall be submitted.
(vii) The Public Hearing was attended by only one person and action plan talks
about the allocation of Rs. 50,000 for channelization of the river. An
explanation shall be provided.
(viii) Legible public hearing proceeding in English language shall be submitted.
On submission of information the proposal was considered in the present meeting.
The PP submitted that the PP is eligible for mine lease renewal for the period of 3
years as per the present mining policy of U.P. Government. PP informed that
project may have risk of flash floods and an affidavit was submitted stating that a
regular link with the district disaster management authority will be maintained to
keep a proper mechanism of communication. The PP informed that mine site is
located 5.71 km away from identified CPA. One month baseline data for the month
of December, 2014 was submitted and it was explained that the values of PM10,
SOx, NOx were very low as the monitoring stations were located in residential area
covered with approx. 70% green/open area and are far away from the main
commercial and industrial area of Delhi and Ghaziabad. The revised questionnaire
was submitted and it was informed that Public Hearing was attended by 31 persons.
Attendance sheet of the Public hearing was submitted along with the legible
proceedings in English language.
After detailed discussion, the committee noted that CPCB/ SPCB are yet to
confirm the location with respect to project falling in CEPI area and that in view of
Moratorium continuing in Gaziabad District, certificate from CPCB is required to be
furnished by the proponent.
EAC also recommended the proposal subject to submission of Certificate
from CPCB about location of the project and with additional specific condition to
submit action plan for reducing Air pollution in and around the periphery of mine
lease area as present AAQ level is exceeding the annual average standard for PM 10
and PM 2.5.
(2.35)Ongole Magnetite Deposits (ML area 529.04 ha) and iron ore beneficiation
of 5.0 MTPA with a through put of 1.35 MTPA of concentrate of M/s A.P.
Mineral Development Corp. Ltd at village Konijedu and Marlapadu, Mandal
Ongole in District Prakasam in Andhra Pradesh (Consultants Bhagavathi
Ana Labs Ltd, Hyderabad)
The proposal is for mining of 5.0 TPA of Magnetite Ore Mining and Ore
beneficiation of 5.0 MTPA through put to obtain 1.35 MTPA of concentrate of M/s
A.P. Mineral Development Corp. Ltd at village Konijedu and Marlapadu, Mandal
Ongole in District Prakasam in Andhra Pradesh.The Latitudes and Longitudes of the
site are N 150 26’ 06.453” to N 150 27’ 36.549” and E 790 57’ 46.643” to E 800 00’
02.375”.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 59 of 77
The Terms of the Reference for the Project was issued by Ministry vide Letter
No J-11015/257/09-IA.II (M) dated 6th November 2009. The mine lease area is
529.04 ha which is Government waste land. There is no forest land in the lease
area. The mining plan for the project is approved by IBM vide letter No.
MP/AP/PKSM/Magnetite – 194-SZ dated 03.03.2009. It is reported by the Project
Proponent that mine is proposed for a maximum annual production of 5.0 MTPA.
The mined out material will be beneficiated to obtain 1.35 MTPA of Beneficiated
Concentrate. It is proposed to work this deposit by opencast mechanised mining
method using drilling and blasting using blast hole drills, hydraulic excavators and
heavy duty rear tipping trucks as major mining equipment. The area forms part of
the coastal plains at an elevation of 15.2 m above MSL and rises to the heights upto
135 m MSL. A statutory barrier of 7.5 m is considered inside and around the lease
area applied for as per MMR. The top soil encountered, if any, will be stacked
separately and utilized for afforestation purposes.
Life of the mine is around 18-20 years. The water requirement is estimated
as 222 m3/hr (Make up water requirement, which will be sourced from
Gundlakamma Reservoir. Total Geological Reserves are 71.18 million tonnes and
Mineable Reserves: 63.32 million tonnes. Conceptual mine development will be
carried out in 137.65 ha. A total of 10.56million m3 + 6.81 million tons of tail cakes
waste will be handled during life of mine. The waste generated during first five
years will be dumped initially and subsequently it will be used for backfilling of
mined out pits after 5 years. The mining activities will not intersect ground water
table.
It was reported by the PP that there is no wildlife sanctuary/tiger
reserve/national park, etc within the 10 km radius area around the mine lease. As
per the survey carried out there are no Schedule – I species in the study area.
Baseline studies were carried out during summer 2010 and during winter season
2013–14 (Dec 2013– Feb 2014). All the parameters for air, water, and noise
quality were within prescribed standards. The Public Hearing for the proposed mine
was scheduled on 04.02.2011 but the villagers did not attended the meeting and
boycotted the public hearing. The public hearing was re-scheduled on 17.12.2011,
the villagers opposed the public hearing. Only the views of Sri Sunanda Reddy were
recorded who raised the issues related to demand for increase of green belt area,
CSR funds, minimize the damage to ground water. A court case was filed by
villagers in Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide WP no. 5959 of 2012, the
case was disposed off vide order dated 06.03.2012 with advise to approach NGT,
Chennai Bench.
The cost of the project is Rs. 515 Crores. Capital budget for environmental
protection measures is Rs. 61 lakhs and recurring cost is Rs. 31 lakhs. CSR cost:
(Capital Rs: 25.00 lakh + Recurring Rs. 15.00 lakh)
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 60 of 77
The proposal was considered for environmental clearance in the EAC meeting
held during December 19-21, 2012 wherein Committee sought additional
information on following:
1. All the coordinates of the Project area would be reconciled forthwith and the
correct ones furnished to MoEF for their record.
2. Efforts would be made to further reduce water consumption in the production
process and a detailed quantified note on such conservation measure
submitted to MoEF within the next three months.
3. Possible contamination of groundwater by the stored tailing in the two ponds
would be kept under constant surveillance and remedial measures initiated if
so called for.
4. Possible health impacts such as silicosis due to dust would also be guarded
against and periodic Reports on occupational health submitted as required.
On receipt of information the proposal was placed in the meeting held during
June 26th-28th, 2013. During the discussion, it was observed that co-ordinates
mentioned in mine plan and EIA report were not yet rectified. With respect to the
query raised in the previous meeting, it was informed by the project proponent that
water reduction for activities was not possible. The proposal was deliberated and
the Committee was not convinced on the information provided by the PP and thus
was of the view that the project proponent need to address the issues in a
pragmatic manner and thus information may be re-submitted:
(i) All the coordinates of the Project area would be reconciled forthwith and
the correct ones furnished to MoEF for their record.
(ii) In order to reduce the water consumption in the production process, a
detailed quantified note on such conservation measure should be
submitted.
(iii) The remedial measures suggested for contamination of groundwater by the
stored tailing should be comprehensive and details like material used for
impermeable membrane, etc. should be incorporated in the plan.
(iv) Budget allocation for the occupational health measures shall be mentioned.
On submission of information the proposal was re-considered in the EAC meeting
held during October 27-28, 2014. The PP submitted that:
(i) Coordinates of the Project Area are reconciled and certified by Department of
Mines & Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh vide Lr no 37662/R3-1/2013
dated 25.09.2013.
(ii) To reduce the water consumption in the production process following
measures will be adopted:
(a) The Filter Press Machine will be used to process the thickener
underflow to recover maximum extent of the water from the tailings.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 61 of 77
(b) The Filter Press machines recovers approximately 80 to 83% of water
from Thickener under flow and the tailing comes out in form of cakes;
thus eliminating generation of any slurry tailings.
(c) This also eliminates requirement of huge tailing pond and the dams
to create this pond.
(d) Measurement & Monitoring of Water addition and recovery will be
carried out by Automatic Control System (PLC).
(e) The previous make up water requirement was 608 m3/ hour. The
revised make up water requirement with addition of filter press
technology will be 222 m3/ hour. The water saving due to filter press
technology will be 386 m3/ hour.
(iii) Possible contamination of groundwater by the stored tailing in the two
ponds would be kept under constant surveillance and remedial measures will be
initiated if so called for.
(iv) A detailed plan for prevention of silicosis due to dust was submitted by the
PP and it was informed that a Committee will be constituted for Maintaining
OH&S in the Organization.
Based on the information submitted by the Proponent and discussion held in
the meeting, the Committee sought following information:
(i) Status of Court case pending in NGT Chennai filed by the villagers as per
direction of Hon’ble High Court AP.
On submission of information proposal was considered in the present
meeting, the PP informed that no case is pending in NGT, Chennai bench against
the PP. It was informed that the petitioners have neither approached nor filed any
appeal in NGT, Chennai Bench for their redressal. National Green Tribunal Southern
Zone, Chennai through their letter no. NGT/CB/28/2014/2125 dated 28.11.2014
informed that, as per their registers available no appeal against the Order dated
06.03.2012, in W.P. No. 5950/2012 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh is seen
filed in this tribunal, since the NGT bench Chennai started functioning from October
2012.
Based on the information submitted, presentation made by the Proponent,
and discussions held, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance with additional specific conditions:
(i) To reduce the water consumption in the production process following
measures shall be adopted:
(a) The Filter Press Machine proposed to be used to process the thickener
underflow to recover maximum extent of the water. The water from
the tailings shall be recirculated in the process and zero discharge
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 62 of 77
scheme shall be adopted. The make up water requirement with
addition of filter press technology should be 222 m3/ hour.
(b) Measurement & Monitoring of Water addition and recovery should be
carried out by Automatic Control System (PLC).
(ii) Monthly monitoring on possible contamination of groundwater due to two
tailing ponds should be done and project should maintain constant surveillance
and remedial measures should be initiated as required.
(iii) Regular monitoring of workers with respect to OH&S for prevention and
control of silicosis.
(2.36). Bangur Chromite Mining Project of M/s the Orissa mining Corporation
Limited located at village(s) Bangur, Dhanurjaypur and Kusatikri, Tehsil
Hatadihi, District Keonjhar, Orissa. (139.94ha)(Consultant: SENES
Consultants India Pvt. Ltd)
The Proposal was deferred as the Project Proponent did not attend the meeting.
3.1 Any other matter with permission of Chair:
The Committee deliberated on the proposed standardization of TOR for
Mining and Beneficiation project and suggested following TOR. However, further
improvement may be done as suggested by members and TORs may be finalized in
next meeting:
STANDARDIZATION OF TOR FOR BENEFICIATION:
1. The alternate sites considered, the relative merits and demerits and the reasons for
selecting the proposed site.
2. Details of the technology and process involved in the project.
3. Location of the proposed plant w.r.t. the source of raw material and mode of
transportations of the ore from mines to the beneficiation plant.
4. Treatment of run of from the fines/waste dump.
5. Estimation of the fines going into the washings and its management.
6. Details of the equipment, settling pond etc.
7. Detailed material balance to be provided.
8. Source of raw material and its transportation. Steps proposed to be taken to protect
the ore from getting air borne.
9. Management and disposal of tailings and closure plan of the tailing pond, if any,
after the project is over.
10. The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A
detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the
project should also be indicated.
11. A copy of the document in support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful
lessee of the unit should be given.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 63 of 77
12. All documents including EIA and public hearing should be compatible with one
another in terms of the production levels, waste generation and its management and
technology and should be in the name of the lessee.
13. All corner coordinates of the area, superimposed on a High Resolution
Imagery/toposheet should be provided. Such an Imagery of the proposed area
should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area
(core and buffer zone).
14. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board
of Directors? If so, it may be spelt out in the EIA report with description of the
prescribed operating process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement/deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions?
The hierarchical system or administrative order of the Company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions may also
be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or
stakeholders at large may also be detailed in the EIA report.
15. Issues relating to Safety should be detailed. The proposed safeguard measures in
each case should also be provided.
16. The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the plant.
17. Cumulative impact study of both beneficiation plant with suggested mitigation
measures as per the study.
18. Railway siding and its location with handling capacity and safety measures.
19. Option to provide only silo for storage of minerals instead to open stacking to avoid
fugitive dust.
20. Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land,
wildlife sanctuary, national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human
settlements and other ecological features should be indicated. Land use plan of the
lease area should be prepared to encompass preoperational, operational and post
operational phases and submitted. Impact, if any, of change of land use should be
given.
21. Details of the land for any Over Burden Dumps outside the lease, such as extent of
land area, distance from lease, its land use, R&R issues, if any, should be given.
22. A Certificate from the Competent Authority in the State Forest Department should
be provided, confirming the involvement of forest land, if any, in the project area. In
the event of any contrary claim by the Project Proponent regarding the status of
forests, the site may be inspected by the State Forest Department along with the
Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of forests, based on which, the
Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it would
be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the Expert
Appraisal Committees.
23. Status of forestry clearance for the broken up area and virgin forestland involved in
the Project including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory
afforestation (CA) should be indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also
be furnished.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 64 of 77
24. Implementation status of recognition of forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes and
other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 should be
indicated.
25. The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details, should
be given.
26. A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Project on wildlife of the
study area and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the
surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly detailed mitigative
measures required, should be worked out with cost implications and submitted.
27. Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors,
Ramsar site Tiger/Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), if any, within
10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated, supported by a location map
duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be
applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as
mentioned above, should be obtained from the Standing Committee of National
Board of Wildlife under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.
28. A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km
radius of the periphery of the lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna,
duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based
on such primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In
case of any schedule-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their
conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife
Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing
the same should be made as part of the project cost. The Conservation Plan for
Schedule-I species shall be approved by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State
Government.
29. Proximity to Areas declared as ‘Critically Polluted’ or the Project areas likely to come
under the ‘Aravali Range’, (attracting court restrictions for operations), should also
be indicated and where so required, clearance certifications from the prescribed
Authorities, such as the SPCB or State Dept. Should be secured and furnished to the
effect that the proposed activities could be considered.
30. Similarly, for coastal Projects, A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the
authorized agencies demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the lease w.r.t
CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any, should be furnished. (Note: The
Projects falling under CRZ would also need to obtain approval of the concerned
Coastal Zone Management Authority).
31. R&R Plan/compensation details for the Project Affected People (PAP) should be
furnished. While preparing the R&R Plan, the relevant State/National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs /STs and other
weaker sections of the society in the study area, a need based sample survey,
family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and action
programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral
programmes of line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly
brought out whether the village located in the lease area will be shifted or not. The
issues relating to shifting of Village including their R&R and socio-economic aspects
should be discussed in the report.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 65 of 77
32. One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM10,
SO2 and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected
and the AAQ and other data so compiled presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP
Report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the
monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and
justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of
sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within 500 m of
the lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical composition of
PM10, particularly for free silica, should be given.
33. Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on
the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement
of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input
parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be
shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of
sensitive receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant
wind direction may also be indicated on the map.
34. Project Proponent shall enclose all the analysis/testing reports of water, air, soil,
noise etc. using the MoEF/NABL accredited laboratories. All the original
analysis/testing reports should be available during appraisal of the project.
35. The water requirement for the Project, its availability and source should be
furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water
requirement for the Project should be indicated.
36. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of
water for the Project should be provided.
37. Description of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the Project
should be given. Details of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any,
should be provided.
38. Impact of the project on the water quality, both surface and groundwater should be
assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required, should be provided.
39. Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will
intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be
provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed Hydro
Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished. Necessary permission
from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for
pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.
40. Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through the lease area and
modification / diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the
hydrology should be brought out.
41. Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. Should be
provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the
same.
42. A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular
form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame)
and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on
commencement of the project. The plant species selected for green belt should have
greater ecological value and should be of good utility value to the local population
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 66 of 77
with emphasis on local and native species and the species which are tolerant to the
pollution.
43. Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated.
Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the Project in the present road
network (including those outside the Project area) should be worked out, indicating
whether it is capable of handling the incremental load. Arrangement for improving
the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies
such as State Government) should be covered.
44. Details of the onsite shelter and facilities to be provided to the workers should be
included in the EIA report.
45. A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular
form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame)
and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on
commencement of the project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and compensatory
afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under
plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done
should be given.
46. Occupational Health impacts of the Project should be anticipated and the proposed
preventive measures spelt out in detail. Details of pre-placement medical
examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated in
the EMP. The project specific occupational health mitigation measures with required
facilities proposed in the mining area may be detailed.
47. Public health implications of the Project and related activities for the population in
the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial
measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocations.
48. Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community
proposed to be provided by the Project Proponent should be indicated. As far as
possible, quantitative dimensions may be given with time frames for
implementation.
49. Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts
which, should inter-alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of
agricultural and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other
impacts specific to the proposed Project.
50. Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same
along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and
also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.
51. Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed
by any Court of Law against the project should be given.
52. The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards
implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.
53. Provide a brief background of the project, financial position, group companies and
legal issues etc.; past and current important litigations.
54. Provide information in Survey of India Toposheet in 1:50000 scale indicating
geological map of area, geomorphology of land forms of the area, existing minerals
and mining history of the area, important water bodies and rivers and soil
characteristics.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 67 of 77
55. In addition to providing wildlife and Schedule-I Species include data on endangered,
endemic and RET Species of plants in the study area.
56. Details about the land proposed for mining with information as to whether mining
conforms to the prescriptions of land use policy of the State ; land diversion for
mining to have approval from State land use board or concerned authority.
STANDARDIZATION OF TOR FOR MINING
1. Year-wise production details since 1994 should be given, clearly stating the highest
production achieved in any one year prior to 1994. It may also be categorically
informed whether there had been any increase in production after the EIA
Notification, 1994 came into force w.r.t. the highest production achieved prior to
1994.
2. A copy of the document in support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful
lessee of the mine should be given.
3. All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and public hearing should be
compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels,
waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the
name of the lessee.
4. All corner coordinates of the mine lease area, superimposed on a High Resolution
Imagery/toposheet should be provided. Such an Imagery of the proposed area
should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area
(core and buffer zone).
5. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board
of Directors? If so, it may be spelt out in the EIA report with description of the
prescribed operating process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement/deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions?
The hierarchical system or administrative order of the Company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions may also
be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or
stakeholders at large may also be detailed in the EIA report.
6. Issues relating to Mine Safety, including subsidence study in case of underground
mining and slope study in case of open cast mining, blasting study etc. should be
detailed. The proposed safeguard measures in each case should also be provided.
7. The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease
periphery and the data contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc should be
for the life of the mine / lease period.
8. Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land,
wildlife sanctuary, national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human
settlements and other ecological features should be indicated. Land use plan of the
mine lease area should be prepared to encompass preoperational, operational and
post operational phases and submitted. Impact, if any, of change of land use should
be given.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 68 of 77
9. Details of the land for any Over Burden Dumps outside the mine lease, such as
extent of land area, distance from mine lease, its land use, R&R issues, if any,
should be given.
10. A Certificate from the Competent Authority in the State Forest Department should
be provided, confirming the involvement of forest land, if any, in the project area. In
the event of any contrary claim by the Project Proponent regarding the status of
forests, the site may be inspected by the State Forest Department along with the
Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of forests, based on which, the
Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it would
be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the Expert
Appraisal Committees.
11. Status of forestry clearance for the broken up area and virgin forestland involved in
the Project including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory
afforestation (CA) should be indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also
be furnished.
12. Implementation status of recognition of forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes and
other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 should be
indicated.
13. The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details, should
be given.
14. A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Mining Project on wildlife of
the study area and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the
surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly detailed mitigative
measures required, should be worked out with cost implications and submitted.
15. Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors,
Ramsar site Tiger/Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), if any, within
10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated, supported by a location map
duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be
applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as
mentioned above, should be obtained from the Standing Committee of National
Board of Wildlife under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.
16. A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km
radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and
fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished
based on such primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna
present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary
plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and
Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for
implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.
17. Proximity to Areas declared as ‘Critically Polluted’ or the Project areas likely to come
under the ‘Aravali Range’, (attracting court restrictions for mining operations),
should also be indicated and where so required, clearance certifications from the
prescribed Authorities, such as the SPCB or State Mining Dept. Should be secured
and furnished to the effect that the proposed mining activities could be considered.
18. Similarly, for coastal Projects, A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the
authorized agencies demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the mine lease
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 69 of 77
w.r.t CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any, should be furnished. (Note:
The Mining Projects falling under CRZ would also need to obtain approval of the
concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority).
19. R&R Plan/compensation details for the Project Affected People (PAP) should be
furnished. While preparing the R&R Plan, the relevant State/National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs /STs and other
weaker sections of the society in the study area, a need based sample survey,
family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and action
programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral
programmes of line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly
brought out whether the village located in the mine lease area will be shifted or not.
The issues relating to shifting of Village including their R&R and socio-economic
aspects should be discussed in the report.
20. One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM10,
SO2 and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected
and the AAQ and other data so compiled presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP
Report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the
monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and
justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of
sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within 500 m of
the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical
composition of PM10, particularly for free silica, should be given.
21. Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on
the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement
of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input
parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be
shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of
sensitive receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant
wind direction may also be indicated on the map.
22. The water requirement for the Project, its availability and source should be
furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water
requirement for the Project should be indicated.
23. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of
water for the Project should be provided.
24. Description of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the Project
should be given. Details of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any,
should be provided.
25. Impact of the project on the water quality, both surface and groundwater should be
assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required, should be provided.
26. Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will
intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be
provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed Hydro
Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished. Necessary permission
from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for
pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 70 of 77
27. Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through the lease area and
modification / diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the
hydrology should be brought out.
28. Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. Should be
provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the
same.
29. A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular
form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame)
and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on
commencement of the project. The plant species selected for green belt should
have greater ecological value and should be of good utility value to the local
population with emphasis on local and native species and the species which are
tolerant to the pollution.
30. Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated.
Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the Project in the present road
network (including those outside the Project area) should be worked out, indicating
whether it is capable of handling the incremental load. Arrangement for improving
the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies
such as State Government) should be covered.
31. Details of the onsite shelter and facilities to be provided to the mine workers should
be included in the EIA report.
32. Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Restoration of mined out
areas (with plans and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA
report.
33. A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular
form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame)
and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on
commencement of the project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and compensatory
afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under
plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done
should be given.
34. Occupational Health impacts of the Project should be anticipated and the proposed
preventive measures spelt out in detail. Details of pre-placement medical
examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated in
the EMP. The project specific occupational health mitigation measures with required
facilities proposed in the mining area may be detailed.
35. Public health implications of the Project and related activities for the population in
the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial
measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocations.
36. Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community
proposed to be provided by the Project Proponent should be indicated. As far as
possible, quantitative dimensions may be given with time frames for
implementation.
37. Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts
which, should inter-alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 71 of 77
agricultural and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other
impacts specific to the proposed Project.
38. Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same
along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and
also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.
39. Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed
by any Court of Law against the project should be given.
40. The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards
implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.
41. Provide information in Survey of India Toposheet in 1:50000 scale indicating
geological map of area, geomorphology of land forms of the area, existing minerals
and mining history of the area, important water bodies and rivers and soil
characteristics.
42. In addition to providing wildlife and Schedule-I Species include data on endangered,
endemic and RET Species of plants in the study area.
43. Details about the land proposed for mining with information as to whether mining
conforms to the prescriptions of land use policy of the State ; land diversion for
mining to have approval from State land use board or concerned authority.
The Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.
***
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 72 of 77
Annexure-I
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1. Year-wise production details since 1994 should be given, clearly stating the highest
production achieved in any one year prior to 1994. It may also be categorically
informed whether there had been any increase in production after the EIA
Notification, 1994 came into force w.r.t. the highest production achieved prior to
1994.
2. A copy of the document in support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful
lessee of the mine should be given.
3. All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and public hearing should be
compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels,
waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the
name of the lessee.
4. All corner coordinates of the mine lease area, superimposed on a High Resolution
Imagery/toposheet should be provided. Such an Imagery of the proposed area
should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area
(core and buffer zone).
5. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board
of Directors? If so, it may be spelt out in the EIA report with description of the
prescribed operating process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement/deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions?
The hierarchical system or administrative order of the Company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions may also
be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or
stakeholders at large may also be detailed in the EIA report.
6. Issues relating to Mine Safety, including subsidence study in case of underground
mining and slope study in case of open cast mining, blasting study etc. should be
detailed. The proposed safeguard measures in each case should also be provided.
7. The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease
periphery and the data contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc should be
for the life of the mine / lease period.
8. Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land,
wildlife sanctuary, national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human
settlements and other ecological features should be indicated. Land use plan of the
mine lease area should be prepared to encompass preoperational, operational and
post operational phases and submitted. Impact, if any, of change of land use should
be given.
9. Details of the land for any Over Burden Dumps outside the mine lease, such as
extent of land area, distance from mine lease, its land use, R&R issues, if any,
should be given.
10.A Certificate from the Competent Authority in the State Forest Department should
be provided, confirming the involvement of forest land, if any, in the project area.
In the event of any contrary claim by the Project Proponent regarding the status of
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 73 of 77
forests, the site may be inspected by the State Forest Department along with the
Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of forests, based on which,
the Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it
would be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the
Expert Appraisal Committees.
11.Status of forestry clearance for the broken up area and virgin forestland involved in
the Project including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory
afforestation (CA) should be indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also
be furnished.
12.Implementation status of recognition of forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes
and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
should be indicated.
13.The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details,
should be given.
14.A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Mining Project on wildlife of
the study area and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the
surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly detailed mitigative
measures required, should be worked out with cost implications and submitted.
15.Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors,
Ramsar site Tiger/Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), if any, within
10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated, supported by a location map
duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be
applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as
mentioned above, should be obtained from the Standing Committee of National
Board of Wildlife under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.
16.A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km
radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and
fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished
based on such primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna
present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary
plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and
Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for
implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.
17.Proximity to Areas declared as ‘Critically Polluted’ or the Project areas likely to
come under the ‘Aravali Range’, (attracting court restrictions for mining
operations), should also be indicated and where so required, clearance certifications
from the prescribed Authorities, such as the SPCB or State Mining Dept. Should be
secured and furnished to the effect that the proposed mining activities could be
considered.
18.Similarly, for coastal Projects, A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the
authorized agencies demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the mine lease
w.r.t CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any, should be furnished. (Note:
The Mining Projects falling under CRZ would also need to obtain approval of the
concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority).
19.R&R Plan/compensation details for the Project Affected People (PAP) should be
furnished. While preparing the R&R Plan, the relevant State/National Rehabilitation
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 74 of 77
& Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs /STs and other
weaker sections of the society in the study area, a need based sample survey,
family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and action
programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral
programmes of line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly
brought out whether the village located in the mine lease area will be shifted or not.
The issues relating to shifting of Village including their R&R and socio-economic
aspects should be discussed in the report.
20.One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM10,
SO2 and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected
and the AAQ and other data so compiled presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP
Report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of
the monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and
justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of
sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within 500 m of
the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical
composition of PM10, particularly for free silica, should be given.
21.Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on
the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement
of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input
parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be
shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of
sensitive receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-
dominant wind direction may also be indicated on the map.
22.The water requirement for the Project, its availability and source should be
furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water
requirement for the Project should be indicated.
23.Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of
water for the Project should be provided.
24.Description of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the Project
should be given. Details of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any,
should be provided.
25.Impact of the project on the water quality, both surface and groundwater should be
assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required, should be provided.
26.Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will
intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be
provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed Hydro
Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished. Necessary permission
from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for
pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.
27.Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through the lease area and
modification / diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the
hydrology should be brought out.
28.Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. Should be
provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the
same.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 75 of 77
29.A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a
tabular form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and
time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up
front on commencement of the project. The plant species selected for green belt
should have greater ecological value and should be of good utility value to the local
population with emphasis on local and native species and the species which are
tolerant to the pollution.
30.Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated.
Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the Project in the present road
network (including those outside the Project area) should be worked out, indicating
whether it is capable of handling the incremental load. Arrangement for improving
the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies
such as State Government) should be covered.
31.Details of the onsite shelter and facilities to be provided to the mine workers should
be included in the EIA report.
32.Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Restoration of mined out
areas (with plans and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA
report.
33.A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a
tabular form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and
time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up
front on commencement of the project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and
compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be
covered under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation
already done should be given.
34.Occupational Health impacts of the Project should be anticipated and the proposed
preventive measures spelt out in detail. Details of pre-placement medical
examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated
in the EMP. The project specific occupational health mitigation measures with
required facilities proposed in the mining area may be detailed.
35.Public health implications of the Project and related activities for the population in
the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial
measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocations.
36.Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community
proposed to be provided by the Project Proponent should be indicated. As far as
possible, quantitative dimensions may be given with time frames for
implementation.
37.Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts
which, should inter-alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of
agricultural and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other
impacts specific to the proposed Project.
38.Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same
along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and
also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.
39.Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed
by any Court of Law against the project should be given.
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 76 of 77
40.The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards
implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.
41.Provide information in Survey of India Toposheet in 1:50000 scale indicating
geological map of area, geomorphology of land forms of the area, existing minerals
and mining history of the area, important water bodies and rivers and soil
characteristics.
42.In addition to providing wildlife and Schedule-I Species include data on endangered,
endemic and RET Species of plants in the study area.
43.Details about the land proposed for mining with information as to whether mining
conforms to the prescriptions of land use policy of the State ; land diversion for
mining to have approval from State land use board or concerned authority.
***
Minutes of 30th EAC Meeting held during January 29-30, 2015 Page 77 of 77
Annexure-II
List of Participants
1. Dr. S. Subramaniyan Acting Chairman
2. Shri A.K. Bhatnagar Member
3. Prof. G.S. Roonwall Member
4. Dr. S.K. Peshin Member
5. Dr. D. Mohamed Kizhar Irshath Member
6. Dr. V.P. Upadhyay, Director (Scientific), MoEF&CC Member Secretary
7. Dr. R. B. Lal, Joint Director(S), MoEF&CC
8. Dr. Sonu Singh, Deputy Director (S), MoEF&CC
9. Representative of M/s Shri Devender Nagpal, S/o Shri Ramdass
10. Representative of M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd.
11. Representative of M/s Friends Crushers
12. Representative of M/s Mallelil Industries Pvt. Ltd
13. Representative of M/s Valakkavu Granites Pvt. Ltd.
14. Representative of M/s P.V. Granites
15. Representative of M/s Mr. Sunil Kumar S.
16. Representative of M/s Mr. Binu Cherian
17. Representative of M/s Aaraamam Rock (P) Ltd.
18. Representative of M/s RAVEENDRA ROCKS CRUSHING PLANT
19. Representative of M/s Ever-One Properties India Pvt. Ltd.
20. Representative of M/s Valiakalathil Rock Crushing
21. Representative of M/s Pynadath Granites Pvt. Ltd.
22. Representative of M/s Kottakkal Granite Industries
23. Representative of M/s Mr V K Benny
24. Representative of M/s Kilinakod Rock Products Pvt. Ltd
25. Representative of M/s Safa Stone Crusher
26. Representative of M/s Pullipadam Metal and Metal Sand Pvt. Ltd.
27. Representative of M/s Edathadan Granites (P) Ltd.
28. Representative of M/s Mr. Nizamudheen K.S.
29. Representative of M/s C.G. George
30. Representative of M/s V.P. Shareef
31. Representative of M/s Blue Mountain Granites
32. Representative of M/s S. Sobhan Babu
33. Representative of M/s Arvind Dhawan Budh Singh
34. Representative of M/s A.P. Mineral Development Corp. Ltd
*****