minimal intervention dentistry – the challenge for materials

21
Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials John W. Nicholson University of Greenwich

Upload: medicineandfamily

Post on 07-May-2015

1.394 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

John W. NicholsonUniversity of Greenwich

Page 2: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Minimal Intervention Dentistry

- Modern approach to the treatment of tooth decay- Based on “Medical Model” of caries management

Page 3: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Historical Development of Dentistry

- Extraction; - Surgical approach (“drilling and filling”): after G.V. Black;- Medical approach – Minimal Intervention.

Page 4: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 5: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 6: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

G.V. Black

- Developed in the 1890s;

- Highly formalised cavity design;

- “Extension for prevention”.

Page 7: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Critique of G.V. Black’s approach

- A surgical model; - Caries “cured” by excision, then filling;- Appropriate for weak, non-adhesive materials; - Still the prevailing paradigm in the profession.

Page 8: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 9: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 10: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 11: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 12: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

The Minimal Intervention approach

- A medical model;

- Caries treated as a biological infection;

- Surgical techniques are minor and stress retention of tooth tissue.

Page 13: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Details of the MI approach

- (1) Reduces cariogenic bacteria;

- (2) Uses preventive measures;

- (3) Early lesions remineralised;

- (4) Minimal surgery on cavities;

- (5) Repair of defective restorations.

Page 14: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

(1) Cariogenic bacteria

• Caries is a bacterial disease;

• Depends on dietary sucrose;

• Driven by frequency of eating;

• Modified by saliva.

Page 15: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials
Page 16: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

(2) Preventive measures

• Topical fluoride;

• Fissure sealants;

• Patient education on oral hygiene

Page 17: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

(3) Remineralisation

• Requires management by non-intervention;

• Enhanced by fluoride ion in saliva.

Page 18: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

(4) Minimal surgery

• Requires adhesive materials (glass-ionomers, adhesive composite systems);

• Innovative, bespoke cavity design:– Possibly without drilling (ART technique).

Page 19: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

(5) Repair of materials

• To prevent cavity extension;

• Not “botch job”, but appropriate.

Page 20: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

The challenge for materials

• Adhesion– Occurs naturally for glass-ionomers; problematic for

composites.

• Fluoride-release;

• Release of other mineralising ions (PO4, Ca2+);

• Repairable.

Page 21: Minimal Intervention Dentistry – The Challenge for Materials

Conclusions

• Minimal Intervention dentistry is the future:– Advocated by FDI;– Cost effective;– Less trauma for the patient.

• A biological approach, not a mechanical one.

• Makes significant demands on materials.