miniaturization of rectangular microstrip patch antenna using optimized single-slotted ground plane
TRANSCRIPT
show the insertion loss of 2.42 and 1.99 dB at the center fre-
quency of 2.43 and 5.70 GHz, respectively, and the bandwidth
is slightly reduced.
The tapped-line geometry is imported for the second trans-
mission zeros by alternating the coupling section and the
tapped-line structure in the suggested dualband BPF using dual-
mode resonator, as shown in Figure 6. The position of the
tapped-line can be defined by the impedance, zR2, and the value
of the inverter. The electrical lengths of yt and yt0 are calculated
as 7� and 46�, respectively. Figure 6 shows the photograph for
the fabricated dualband BPF using dual-mode resonator with the
coupling and tapped-line geometry for the two transmission ze-
ros and its size is 25.81 � 28.59 mm2. The simulation and mea-
surement results of the dualband BPF using dual-mode resonator
are shown in Figure 7. The dualband BPF is simulated with the
insertion losses of 1.75 and 1.40 dB at 2.43 and 5.68 GHz,
respectively, and measured with the insertion loss of 1.92 and
1.71 dB at the center frequency of 2.42 and 5.65 GHz, respec-
tively. Also, each passband of the suggested dualband BPF has
two transmission zeros.
4. CONCLUSION
In this article, the value of the J-inverter for the dual-mode kg/2BPF is investigated as functions of the impedance and the elec-
trical length of the open-stub for the dual-mode kg/2 microstrip
resonator. As impedance of the open-stub decreases, the dual-
mode kg/2 BPF has a good out-of-band performance and low
value of the inverter. The dualband BPF using dual-mode reso-
nator for 2.45 and 5.8 GHz is suggested by using the second
spurious of the SIR structure that has the ratio of the impedance
of 0.581. To demonstrate the dualband BPF using dual-mode
resonator with two transmission zeros, the coupling structure
and tapped-line geometry are used for the J-inverter. By the
open-stub of the dual-mode kg/2 resonator, the bandwidth and
the frequency of one transmission zero are defined, and the other
transmission zero is defined by the open-stub of the tapped-line
geometry as a function of the J-inverter. The dualband BPF
using dual-mode resonator has been implemented and measured
with good performance. These BPFs can be used in wireless
communication system.
REFERENCES
1. J.R. Lee, J.H. Cho, and S.W. Yun, New compact bandpass filter
using microstrip kg/4 resonators with open stub inverter, IEEE
Microw Guid Wave Lett 10 (2000), 526–527.
2. H. Zhang and K.J. Chen, Bandpass filters with reconfigurable trans-
mission zeros using varactor-tuned tapped stubs, IEEE Microw
Wirel Compon Lett 16 (2006), 249–251.
3. L. Zhu and W. Menzel, Compact microstrip bandpass filter with
two transmission zeros using a stub-tapped half-wavelength line
resonator, IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett 13 (2003), 16–18.
4. W.H. Tu, Compact double-mode cross-coupled microstrip bandpass
filter with tunable transmission zeros, IET Microw Antennas
Propag 2 (2008), 373–377.
5. J.S. Hong and M.J. Lancaster, Microwave filters for RF/microwave
applications, Wiley, New York, NY, 2001.
6. T.S. Yun, H.S. Kim, T.S. Hyun, S.S. Kwoun, H.G. Kim, and J.C.
Lee, Tunable stepped impedance resonator bandpass filter using
ferroelectric materials, Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf Dig 3 (2006),
1773–1776.
7. J.R. Crute and L.E. Davis, A compact microstrip interdigital
stepped-impedance band-pass filter with enhanced stop band,
Microwave Opt Technol Lett 34 (2002), 336–340.
8. T.S. Yun, Y.K. Yoon, B. Lee, J.J. Choi, J.Y. Kim, and J.C. Lee,
Analysis and design of stub bandpass filters using tapped-line ge-
ometry, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 51 (2009), 2338–2341.
VC 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
MINIATURIZATION OF RECTANGULARMICROSTRIP PATCH ANTENNA USINGOPTIMIZED SINGLE-SLOTTED GROUNDPLANE
S. Sarkar,1 A. Das Majumdar,1 S. Mondal,1 S. Biswas,2
D. Sarkar,2 and P. P. Sarkar21 Kalyani Government Engineering College, Kalyani, Nadia, WestBengal, India2 USIC, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India;Corresponding author: [email protected]
Received 20 April 2010
ABSTRACT: In this article, a new design for single-layer rectangularmicrostrip patch antenna has been proposed. This design uses a groundplane with a single slot. It has been shown that by using this slotted
ground plane, the resonant frequency has been lowered considerably,
Figure 6 Fabricated dualband BPF using dual-mode microstrip resona-
tor with tapped-line geometry for two transmission zeros. [Color figure
can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 7 Simulation and measurement results of dualband BPF using
dual-mode microstrip resonator with tapped-line geometry for two trans-
mission zeros. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 53, No. 1 January 2011 111
thus, reducing the size of the antenna. Using this design, the size of theantenna is reduced by about 90%. It has been also shown that theresonant frequency can be reduced further by increasing the length of
the slot. VC 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett
53:111–115, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com.
DOI 10.1002/mop.25661
Key words: microstrip antenna; patch antenna; compact antenna
1. INTRODUCTION
Microstrip antenna, due to its inherent advantages of being low
cost, lightweight, and low profile structure, is being extensively
used in handheld communication devices such as mobile phones,
GPS, etc. One of the physical characteristics of these handheld
devices is small size. To reduce the size of these devices, the size
of the components used inside these devices has to be reduced. As
microstrip antenna is one of the components being used, the size of
these devices depends on this antenna to a large extent. Therefore,
one of the techniques of reducing the size of the handheld commu-
nication device is to reduce the size of the microstrip antenna.
A number of techniques have been reported to reduce the
size of a Microstrip antenna. The simplest of them is by modify-
ing the radiating patch or by modifying the ground plane. A
large number of compact antenna design has been reported
based on the radiating patch modification and ground plane
modification technique [1–14]. It was reported by Kuo and
Wong [1] that by embedding three meandering slots in the
ground plane of the rectangular microstrip patch antenna, the
size of the antenna can be reduced by 56%.
In this article, we are proposing a novel design for compact
microstrip antenna in which only one slot is used in the ground
plane and the feeding point is positioned to get the optimum
result. It was also found that the proposed antenna has higher
impedance bandwidth compared with the reference antenna.
2. ANTENNA DESIGN
Figure 1 shows the geometry of the proposed antenna. The fig-
ure has been drawn in third-angle projection. The design of the
antenna is asymmetrical in nature. The slot of width 1 mm and
length S is embedded in the ground plane parallel to the edge
A. It is embedded at a distance R from the edge A and at a dis-
tance P from edge B. The radiating patch is coaxially probe fed
through a via hole in the ground plane at 1.5 mm from the
edge B and 20.5 mm from edge C. The probe is fed at this
position to obtain optimum impedance matching. The size of
the radiating patch is chosen 20 � 30 mm2. The antennas
(antennas 1–6) with mentioned geometry has been constructed
using PTFE substrate (er¼ 2.4) with thickness of 1.5875 mm (1/
16 inch).
Figure 1 Structure of the proposed antenna
TABLE 1 Simulated Results
Antenna
R(mm)
P(mm)
S(mm)
Resonant Frequency,
Return Loss
(GHz, dB)
10-dB
Bandwidth
(MHz, %)
Antenna 1 18.5 3 46 1.6055, �12.3 42, 2.61
Antenna 2 18.5 2 47 1.5365, �19.1 54, 3.51
Antenna 3 18.5 1 48 1.5235, �25.5 55, 3.64
Antenna 4 19.5 3 46 1.5875, �16.6 57, 3.59
Antenna 5 19.5 2 47 1.5085, �44.8 58, 3.87
Antenna 6 19.5 1 48 1.4456, �16.1 46, 3.23
Reference 0 0 0 3.0800, �8.08 –
TABLE 2 Measured Results
Antenna
R(mm)
P(mm)
S(mm)
Resonant Frequency,
Return Loss
(GHz, dB)
10-dB
Bandwidth
(MHz, %)
Antenna 1 18.5 3 46 1.5920, �14.0 117.8, 7.4
Antenna 2 18.5 2 47 1.4810, �26.2 189.8, 12.8
Antenna 3 18.5 1 48 1.4700, �22.4 108.8, 7.4
Antenna 4 19.5 3 46 1.4800, �19.0 140.0, 9.5
Antenna 5 19.5 2 47 1.3800, �38.6 168.4, 12.2
Antenna 6 19.5 1 48 1.3660, �17.2 100.0, 7.3
Reference 0 0 0 2.8700, �6.8 –
112 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 53, No. 1 January 2011 DOI 10.1002/mop
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The return losses of the proposed antennas were studied using
IE3DTM (based on Method of Moment (MoM)) and the results
are shown in Table 1. The return losses of the fabricated anten-
nas were studied using network analyzer and the results are
shown in Table 2.
During simulation, it was observed that largest reduction in
resonant frequency is obtained if the slot is placed at position
with R ¼ 19.5 mm. It was also observed that if the slot is posi-
tioned in any other position, then the resonant frequency
increases for a given slot size. This can be verified from the
measured return loss of antenna 1, antenna 2, and antenna 3
(each of whose return loss plot is shown in Figures 2–4, respec-
tively) by comparing with that of antenna 4, antenna 5 and
antenna 6 (each of whose return loss plot is shown in Figures
5–8, respectively). From the result, it is also observed that if the
length of the slot is increased toward edge B, then the resonant
frequency is decreased. Using the proposed design, we have
achieved size reduction of 88% (simulated result) and 90%
Figure 3 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 2 having R ¼18.5 mm, P ¼ 2 mm, and S ¼ 47 mm
Figure 4 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 3 having R ¼18.5 mm, P ¼ 1 mm, and S ¼ 48 mm
Figure 2 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 1 having R ¼18.5 mm, P ¼ 3 mm, and S ¼ 46 mm
Figure 5 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 4 having R ¼19.5 mm, P ¼ 3 mm, and S ¼ 46 mm
Figure 6 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 5 having R ¼19.5 mm, P ¼ 2 mm, and S ¼ 47 mm
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 53, No. 1 January 2011 113
Figure 10 Radiation pattern of antenna 2 having R ¼ 18.5 mm, P ¼2 mm, and S ¼ 47 mm at 1.481 GHz
Figure 11 Radiation pattern of antenna 3 having R ¼ 18.5 mm, P ¼1 mm, and S ¼ 48 mm at 1.47 GHz
Figure 12 Radiation pattern of antenna 4 having R ¼ 19.5 mm, P ¼3 mm, and S ¼ 46 mm at 1.48 GHz
Figure 8 Measured and simulated return loss of reference antenna
Figure 7 Measured and simulated return loss of antenna 6 having R ¼19.5 mm, P ¼ 1 mm, and S ¼ 48 mm
Figure 9 Radiation pattern of antenna 1 having R ¼ 18.5 mm, P ¼ 3
mm, and S ¼ 46 mm at 1.5920 GHz
114 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 53, No. 1 January 2011 DOI 10.1002/mop
(measured results). We also achieved bandwidth of more then
12 and 7% (for most compact fabricated antenna) which indi-
cates tremendous improvement of bandwidth over traditional
antennas (which normally has bandwidth of about 2–4%). The
radiation pattern of the designed antennas (Figs. 9–14) shows
that the antennas have very broad beamwidth which matches
with the original patch antenna (Fig. 15).
4. CONCLUSIONS
A novel design for miniaturization of antenna by cutting a single
slot in the ground plane of the coaxially feed microstrip patch
antenna has been proposed and fabricated. The fabricated
antenna has been experimentally studied which showed that the
proposed antenna design not only reduces the size of the
antenna but also increases the impedance bandwidth of
the antenna. Further, it has been shown that miniaturization
of the antenna for the proposed design depends on the length of
the slot.
REFERENCES
1. J.S. Kuo and K.L. Wong, A compact microstrip antenna with
meandering slots in the ground plane, Microwave Opt Technol Lett
29 (2001), 95–97.
2. K.L. Wong and W.S. Chen, Compact microstrip antenna with dual-
frequency operation, Electron Lett 33 (1997), 646–647.
3. S.Y. Lin and K.L. Wong, Enhanced performances of a compact
conical-pattern annular-ring patch antenna using a slotted ground
plane, In: Proceedings of the IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Con-
ference, Vol. 3, Taipei, 2001, pp. 1036–1039.[zaq no¼aq4]
4. T.W. Chiou and K.L. Wong, Designs of compact microstrip anten-
nas with a slotted ground plane, In: Proceedings of the IEEE
Antenna and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 2,
Boston, MA, 2001, pp. 732–735.
5. H.D. Chen, Compact circularly polarized microstrip antenna with
slotted ground plane, Electron Lett 34 (2002), 616–617.
6. N. Herscovici, M.F. Osorio, and C. Peixeiro, Miniaturization of
rectangular microstrip patches using genetic algorithms, IEEE
Antenna Wireless Propag Lett 1 (2002), 94–97.
7. W.K. Kim and J.M. Woo, Miniaturization of 3-D microstrip
antenna using fylfot-shaped structure, In: Proceedings of the IEEE
ICECom, Dubrovnik, 2005, pp. 1–4.
8. G.A. Mavridis, C.G. Christodoulou, and M.T. Chryssomallis, Area
miniaturization of a microstrip patch antenna, In: Proceedings of
the IEEE Antenna and Propagation Society International Sympo-
sium, Honolulu, HI, 2007, pp. 5435–5438.
9. S. Bhunia, D. Sarkar, S. Biswas, P.P. Sarkar, B. Gupta, and K.
Yasumoto, Reduced size small dual and multi-frequency microstrip
antennas, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 50 (2008), 961–965.
10. S. Bhunia, M.K. Pain, S. Biswas, D. Sarkar, P.P. Sarkar, and B.
Gupta Investigations on microstrip patch antennas with different
slots and feeding points, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 50 (2008),
2754–2758.
11. J.Z. Huang, P.H. Yang, W.C. Chew, and T.T. Ye, A compact
broadband patch antenna for UHF RFID tags, In: Proceedings of
the IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Singapore, 2009,
pp. 1044–1047.
12. L. Guo, S. Wang, X. Chen, and C.G. Parini, Study of compact
antenna for UWB applications, Electron Lett 46 (2010), 115–116.
13. K.G. Thomas and M. Sreenivasan, Compact CPW-fed dual-band
antenna, Electron Lett 46 (2010), 13–14.
14. C.Y.D. Sim, W.T. Chung, and C.H. Lee, Compact slot antenna for
UWB applications, IEEE Antenna Wireless Propag Lett 9 (2010),
63–66.
VC 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Figure 15 Radiation pattern of reference antenna at 2.87 GHz
Figure 14 Radiation pattern of antenna 6 with R ¼ 19.5 mm, P ¼ 1
mm, and S ¼ 48 mm at 1.366 GHz
Figure 13 Radiation pattern of antenna 5 having R ¼ 19.5 mm, P ¼2 mm, and S ¼ 47 mm at 1.38 GHz
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 53, No. 1 January 2011 115