mind control - is somebody thinking for you

8/6/2019 Mind Control - Is Somebody Thinking for You

1/10

Mind Control - Is somebody thinking for you?Is there really such a thing as "brainwashing," or "mind control?" What kind of person is

susceptible? What exactly is a "cult" and how are followers controlled? How can one

recognize an organization that engages in such practices, and should such organizations beheld responsible for the damage intentional manipulation can cause?

The most insidious threat to our basic freedoms, such as freedom of mind and freedom of speech, is a little-known phenomenon known as mind control. "Mind control" refers to allcoercive psychological systems, such as brainwashing, thought reform, and coercive

persuasion. Mind control is the shaping of a person's attitudes, beliefs, and personalitywithout the person's knowledge or consent. Mind control employs deceptive andsurreptitious manipulation, usually in a group setting, for the financial or political profit of themanipulator. Mind control works by gradually exerting increasing control over individualsthrough a variety of techniques, such as excessive repetition of routine activities, intense

humiliation, or sleep deprivation.

"Cult" refers to a destructive group which uses mind control to deceivingly influence itsmembers. It has become fairly standard to use this term for any organization or group whichuses mind control on its members. Cults are not necessarily religious. A cult may formaround any theme, such as a political, racial, psychotherapeutic, or even athletic agenda.

For the protection of our basic human and constitutional rights, I hope to provide afundamental education on the subject of mind control so that you can protect yourself andyour loved ones from any individual or organization that is engaging in this kind of manipulation. Satan implemented his mind control scheme on the human race along timeago. Dumbing us down using various mediums. And it is time to recognize them.


2/10

How does Mind Control work?A technical overview of mind control tactics:

[This document, in substance, was presented to the U.S. Supreme Court as an educationalAppendix on coercive psychological systems in the case Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology 89-1367 and 89-1361. The Wollersheim case was being considered related toissues involving abuse in this area. In this document coercive persuasion is the professionalterm being used to describe the nature of coercive psychological systems. Wollersheim case-specific details have been deleted.]

Coercion is defined as, "to restrain or constrain by force..." Legally it often implies theuse of PHYSICAL FORCE or physical or legal threat. This traditional concept of coercion isfar better understood than the technological concepts of "coercive persuasion" which areeffective restraining, impairing, or compelling through the gradual application of PSYCHOLOGICAL FORCES.

A coercive persuasion program is a behavioral change technology applied to cause the"learning" and "adoption" of a set of behaviors or an ideology under certain conditions. It isdistinguished from other forms of benign social learning or peaceful persuasion by theconditions under which it is conducted and by the techniques of environmental andinterpersonal manipulation employed to suppress particular behaviors and to train others.Over time, coercive persuasion, a psychological force akin in some ways to our legal conceptsof undue influence, can be even MORE effective than pain, torture, drugs, and use of physicalforce and legal threats.

The Korean War "Manchurian Candidate" misconception of the need for suggestibility-increasing drugs, and physical pain and torture, to effect thought reform, is generallyassociated with the old concepts and models of brainwashing. Today, they are not necessaryfor a coercive persuasion program to be effective. With drugs, physical pain, torture, or evena physically coercive threat, you can often temporarily make someone do something againsttheir will. You can even make them do something they hate or they really did not like or want to do at the time. They do it, but their attitude is not changed.

This is much different and far less devastating than that which you are able to achievewith the improvements of coercive persuasion. With coercive persuasion you can change

people's attitudes without their knowledge and volition. You can create new "attitudes"where they will do things willingly which they formerly may have detested, things which previously only torture, physical pain, or drugs could have coerced them to do. The advancesin the extreme anxiety and emotional stress production technologies found in coercive

persuasion supersede old style coercion that focuses on pain, torture, drugs, or threat in thatthese older systems do not change attitude so that subjects follow orders "willingly."Coercive persuasion changes both attitude AND behavior, not JUST behavior.

THE PURPOSES AND TACTICS OF COERCIVE PERSUASION

Coercive persuasion or thought reform as it is sometimes known, is best understood as a

coordinated system of graduated coercive influence and behavior control designed todeceptively and surreptitiously manipulate and influence individuals, usually in a groupsetting, in order for the originators of the program to profit in some way, normally financially


3/10

or politically. The essential strategy used by those operating such programs is tosystematically select, sequence and coordinate numerous coercive persuasion tactics over CONTINUOUS PERIODS OF TIME. There are seven main tactic types found in variouscombinations in a coercive persuasion program. A coercive persuasion program can still bequite effective without the presence of ALL seven of these tactic types.

TACTIC 1. The individual is prepared for thought reform through increased suggestibilityand/or "softening up," specifically through hypnotic or other suggestibility-increasingtechniques such as: A. Extended audio, visual, verbal, or tactile fixation drills; B. Excessiveexact repetition of routine activities; C. Decreased sleep; D. Nutritional restriction.

TACTIC 2. Using rewards and punishments, efforts are made to establish considerablecontrol over a person's social environment, time, and sources of social support. Socialisolation is promoted. Contact with family and friends is abridged, as is contact with personswho do not share group-approved attitudes. Economic and other dependence on the group isfostered. (In the forerunner to coercive persuasion, brainwashing, this was rather easy toachieve through simple imprisonment.)

TACTIC 3. Disconfirming information and non-supporting opinions are prohibited in groupcommunication. Rules exist about permissible topics to discuss with outsiders.Communication is highly controlled. An "in-group" language is usually constructed.

TACTIC 4. Frequent and intense attempts are made to cause a person to re-evaluate the mostcentral aspects of his or her experience of self and prior conduct in negative ways. Efforts aredesigned to destabilize and undermine the subject's basic consciousness, reality awareness,world view, emotional control, and defense mechanisms as well as getting them to reinterprettheir life's history, and adopt a new version of causality.

TACTIC 5. Intense and frequent attempts are made to undermine a person's confidence inhimself and his judgment, creating a sense of powerlessness.

TACTIC 6. Nonphysical punishments are used such as intense humiliation, loss of privilege,social isolation, social status changes, intense guilt, anxiety, manipulation and other techniques for creating strong aversive emotional arousals, etc.

TACTIC 7. Certain secular psychological threats [force] are used or are present: That failureto adopt the approved attitude, belief, or consequent behavior will lead to severe punishment

or dire consequence, (e.g. physical or mental illness, the reappearance of a prior physicalillness, drug dependence, economic collapse, social failure, divorce, disintegration, failure tofind a mate, etc.).

Another set of criteria has to do with defining other common elements of mind controlsystems. If most of Robert Jay Lifton's eight point model of thought reform is being used in acultic organization, it is most likely a dangerous and destructive cult. These eight pointsfollow:

Robert Jay Lifton's Eight Point Model of Thought Reform

1. ENVIRONMENT CONTROL. Limitation of many/all forms of communication with thoseoutside the group. Books, magazines,letters and visits with friends and family are taboo. "Come out and be separate!"


4/10

2. MYSTICAL MANIPULATION. The potential convert to the group becomes convinced of the higher purpose and special calling of the group through a profound encounter/experience,for example, through an alleged miracle or prophetic word of those in the group.

3. DEMAND FOR PURITY. An explicit goal of the group is to bring about some kind of change, whether it be on a global, social, or

personal level. "Perfection is possible if one stays with the group and is committed."

4. CULT OF CONFESSION. The unhealthy practice of self disclosure to members in thegroup. Often in the context of a public gathering in the group, admitting past sins andimperfections, even doubts about the group and critical thoughts about the integrity of theleaders.

5. SACRED SCIENCE. The group's perspective is absolutely true and completely adequate toexplain EVERYTHING. The doctrine is not subject to amendments or question. ABSOLUTEconformity to the doctrine is required.

6. LOADED LANGUAGE. A new vocabulary emerges within the context of the group.Group members "think" within the very abstract and narrow parameters of the group'sdoctrine. The terminology sufficiently stops members from thinking critically by reinforcing a"black and white" mentality. Loaded terms and clichs prejudice thinking.

7. DOCTRINE OVER PERSON. Pre-group experience and group experience are narrowlyand decisively interpreted through theabsolute doctrine, even when experience contradicts the doctrine.

8. DISPENSING OF EXISTENCE. Salvation is possible only in the group. Those who leavethe group are doomed.

COERCIVE PERSUASION IS NOT PEACEFUL PERSUASION

Programs identified with the above-listed seven tactics have in common the elements of attempting to greatly modify a person's self-concept, perceptions of reality, and interpersonalrelations. When successful in inducing these changes, coercive thought reform programs also,among other things, create the potential forces necessary for exercising undue influence over a person's independent decision-making ability, and even for turning the individual into a

deployable agent for the organization's benefit without the individual's meaningful knowledgeor consent.

Coercive persuasion programs are effective because individuals experiencing thedeliberately planned severe stresses they generate can only reduce the pressures by acceptingthe system or adopting the behaviors being promulgated by the purveyors of the coercion

program. The relationship between the person and the coercive persuasion tactics areDYNAMIC in that while the force of the pressures, rewards, and punishments brought to bear on the person are considerable, they do not lead to a stable, meaningful SELF-CHOSENreorganization of beliefs or attitudes. Rather, they lead to a sort of coerced compliance and asituationally required elaborate rationalization, for the new conduct.

Once again, in order to maintain the new attitudes or "decisions," sustain therationalization, and continue to unduly influence a person's behavior over time, coercive


5/10

tactics must be more or less CONTINUOUSLY applied. A fiery, "hell and damnation" guilt-ridden sermon from the pulpit or several hours with a high-pressure salesman or other singleinstances of the so-called peaceful persuasions do not constitute the "necessary chords andorchestration" of a SEQUENCED, continuous, COORDINATED, and carefully selectedPROGRAM of surreptitious coercion, as found in a comprehensive program of "coercive

persuasion."

Truly peaceful religious persuasion practices would never attempt to force, compel anddominate the free wills or minds of its members through coercive behavioral techniques or covert hypnotism. They would have no difficulty coexisting peacefully with U.S. laws meantto protect the public from such practices.

Looking like peaceful persuasion is precisely what makes coercive persuasion less likelyto attract attention or to mobilize opposition. It is also part of what makes it such a devastatingcontrol technology. Victims of coercive persuasion have: no signs of physical abuse,convincing rationalizations for the radical or abrupt changes in their behavior, a convincing"sincerity, and they have been changed so gradually that they don't oppose it because theyusually aren't even aware of it.

Deciding if coercive persuasion was used requires case-by-case careful analysis of all theinfluence techniques used and how they were applied. By focusing on the medium of deliveryand process used, not the message, and on the critical differences, not the coincidentalsimilarities, which system was used becomes clear. The Influence Continuum helps make thedifference between peaceful persuasion and coercive persuasion easier to distinguish.

VARIABLES

Not all tactics used in a coercive persuasion type environment will always be coercive.Some tactics of an innocuous or cloaking nature will be mixed in. Not all individuals exposedto coercive persuasion or thought reform programs are effectively coerced into becoming

participants. How individual suggestibility, psychological and physiological strengths,weakness, and differences react with the degree of severity, continuity, andcomprehensiveness in which the various tactics and content of a coercive persuasion programare applied, determine the program's effectiveness and/or the degree of severity of damagecaused to its victims. For example, in United States v. Lee 455 U.S. 252, 257-258 (1982), theCalifornia Supreme Court found that "when a person is subjected to coercive persuasionwithout his knowledge or consent... [he may] develop serious and sometimes irreversible

physical and psychiatric disorders, up to and including schizophrenia, self-mutilation, andsuicide."

WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA OF A COERCIVE PERSUASION PROGRAM?

A). Determine if the subject individual held enough knowledge and volitional capacity tomake the decision to change his or her ideas or beliefs.

B). Determine whether that individual did, in fact, adopt, affirm, or reject those ideas or beliefs on his own.

C). Then, if necessary, all that should be examined is the behavioral processes used, notideological content. One needs to examine only the behavioral processes used in their "conversion." Each alleged coercive persuasion situation should be reviewed on a case-by-


6/10

case basis. The characteristics of coercive persuasion programs are severe, well-understood,and they are not accidental.

COERCIVE PERSUASION IS NOT VOLUNTARY, PEACEFUL, RELIGIOUSPRACTICE OR CENTRAL TO ANY BONAFIDE RELIGION.

Coercive persuasion is not a religious practice, it is a CONTROL technology. It is not a belief or ideology, it is a technological process. As a PROCESS, it can be examined byexperts on its technology COMPLETELY SEPARATE from any idea or belief content,similar to examining the technical process of hypnotic induction distinct from the meaning or value of the post-hypnotic suggestions. Examining PROCESSES in this manner can notviolate First Amendment religious protections. Coercive persuasion is antithetical to the FirstAmendment. It is the unfair manipulation of other's biological and psychological weaknessesand susceptibilities. It is a psychological FORCE technology, not of a free society, but of acriminal or totalitarian society. Any organization using coercive persuasion on its membersas a CENTRAL practice that also claims to be a religion is turning the SANCTUARY of theFirst Amendment into a fortress for psychological assault. It is a contradiction of terms andshould be "disestablished." Coercive persuasion is a subtle, compelling psychological forcewhich attacks an even more fundamental and important freedom than our "freedom of religion." ITS REPREHENSIBILITY AND DANGER IS THAT IT ATTACKS OUR SELF-DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL, OUR MOST FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONALFREEDOMS.

$ The Illuminopoly $

Using a monopoly on the money supply our enemy, the illuminati, set about gobbling upother areas of society, all of which was done while the public slept unawares of theconspiracy. ALL people must know the information contained within this DEBRIEFINGand on this site. The Illuminati managed to get this far off of the ignorance of the people. Wemust be ignorant no more!

There are other things we can do as well. We need to keep pressing the politicians for change and keep them on their toes. Our ultimate goal is to educate the people and turn theouter ring against the inner core with truth until it cracks. We can capture the technology andmake a good use of it. In the right hands, this technology can let the blind see and the deaf hear. Once it is readily available then protective technologies will also emerge. Finally, weneed to realize that what the enemy is doing is fear tactics. We should never give in to

blackmail and fear tactics, even when our own loved ones are used for blackmail becausewhen we give in then someone else, somewhere, is going to be tortured because of our weakness. If you know for a fact someone who is engaged in this mind control business thenturn them in before they kill someone else. Serial Killers do not need to be protected and"national security" is a joke considering there's a One World State which usurps nationalgovernments anyway.

Imagine this, a very secret society, corrupted and hell-bent on world-wide domination,sets up ground based and orbital satellite transmitters, perhaps using MASER'S. The purposeof these are to brainwash, from birth, the citizens of the world with posthypnotic suggestionsto make them operate the way the secret society wants them to with just a few key word

commands. Which words and commands? How about "sleep," "forget," "obey only myvoice," and "I am your master" just to start with! It is said that a person will only go so far with hypnosis and that you can't do anything against your will. This is true, but how much


7/10


8/10


9/10

controlling interest in the stock of the major media companies to fuel their propagandamachine. And since 1913 they've also gone after and attained control of the schooling system,the medical community, the scientific community, the military, the law, the courts, theentertainment community, and have been busy trying to slowly rewrite history to further their agenda. Did you know any of this? Probably not, unless you've kept your eyes open because

knowledge has been controlled and knowledge is power. Most likely you've only known whatthey've wanted you to know, unless you've purposely sought out this information all on your own.

"Stop watching TV, and start thinking for yourself."

"He who controls the money supply controls that nation." If you're in the center of things and control when the market expands or contracts then you know ahead of time what todo financially. The money is there for the taking. Take control of the money system, buy outthe politicians on both sides of the political fence, buy a controlling interest in the stock of the

media companies, change the laws of the land to escape justice, control the schools and keepthe populace dumb. The definition of communism is : A system in which political andeconomic power is concentrated in one party or ruling class. In America that ruling class isthe Federal Reserve and those that control it. Democracy in America is an illusion, one that is

perpetuated with mass genocide. Now that we have a world central banking system and anIMF there is no such animal as democracy. In reality it is a world communist state, a NewWorld Order.

You are literally paying people with your taxes to steal from you and use the stolenmoney to sponsor wars which then kill your children.

MIND CONTROL AND RELIGION

Coercive persuasion is secular conduct. Insofar as it is recognized as coercion and"undue influence," it is illegal conduct. Prohibition of this specific conduct will protect theState itself and the free exercise rights of all citizens without infringing on the free exerciserights of religious organizations.

Coercive persuasion is antithetical to the First Amendment. It achieves much of theharmful result of fraud, false imprisonment, coercion, undue influence, involuntary, servitude,intentional infliction of emotional distress, outrageous conduct, and other tortuous acts.

Coercive persuasion is unfair manipulation of the biological and psychologicalweaknesses and susceptibilities of one's fellow men. It is an opposite to charity and kindness.It is a psychological modus operandi of a criminal or totalitarian society.


10/10

Coercive persuasion is not a religious practice. It is a covert control technology. It is nota belief or an ideology. It is a technological process that impairs rationality.

As a process it can be examined separately from any message content that may be

associated with its practitioners. This is like examining the technical processes used inhypnotic induction separately from examining the meaning or value of any hypnoticsuggestion given during hypnosis. Examining processes, never beliefs, will not violateanyone's First Amendment religious protections.

John Dewey believed that, "the human power to respond to reason and truth protectsdemocracy." Any organization using coercive persuasion on its members that also claims to

be a religion is turning the sacred trust and privileges of our democratic First Amendmentsanctuary into a fortress for psychological assault. It is covertly twisting "religious freedom"to deny our more basic constitutional right to unfettered rationality in our freedom of thoughtand free will.

Freedom of religion cannot exist without first having an absolutely protected freedom of thought. Freedom of religion without freedom of thought is an absurdity.

"... [a] church cannot seek the protection of one constitutional amendment while itallegedly deprives citizens of the protection of other constitutional guarantees." --RobinGeorge v. International Society of Krishna Consciousness 473 F, Supp. at 312, U.S. 89-1399.

As you will learn from other pages on this site, the Illuminati own and operate several big companies which make an enormous amount of money and this money is used to financetheir evil empire.

Quelle: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/mindcontrol/

mind control - is somebody thinking for you

Documents