miller road feasibility study & reconstruction project information and kick-off meeting...
TRANSCRIPT
Miller Road Feasibility Study & Miller Road Feasibility Study & Reconstruction ProjectReconstruction Project
Information and Kick-off MeetingInformation and Kick-off Meeting
Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc.Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc.
ROWE INC.ROWE INC.
Genesee County Road CommissionGenesee County Road Commission
January 24, 2007January 24, 2007
Project ScheduleProject Schedule Public Meetings – Feasibility StudyPublic Meetings – Feasibility Study
• End of January – Kick-off / Informational MeetingEnd of January – Kick-off / Informational Meeting
• End of February – Deficiencies / Access End of February – Deficiencies / Access Management / Draft RecommendationsManagement / Draft Recommendations
• End of March – Final Feasibility RecommendationsEnd of March – Final Feasibility Recommendations
Survey Began Mid-December 2006 Survey Began Mid-December 2006 Preliminary Design UnderwayPreliminary Design Underway Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates AUGUST AUGUST
2007 2007
Major Feasibility Study TasksMajor Feasibility Study Tasks
Collect and Review Traffic and Crash DataCollect and Review Traffic and Crash Data Review Existing and Future ConditionsReview Existing and Future Conditions Identify Transportation Goals and ObjectivesIdentify Transportation Goals and Objectives Determine Access Management StrategiesDetermine Access Management Strategies Recommend Feasible AlternativesRecommend Feasible Alternatives Evaluate AlternativesEvaluate Alternatives Prepare ReportPrepare Report
I-75 Corridor Study-Genesee County – 2025 Master I-75 Corridor Study-Genesee County – 2025 Master PlanPlan, , URS November 2002URS November 2002
Miller Road Signal Coordination and TimingMiller Road Signal Coordination and Timing , , Parsons Parsons Transportation Group, September 2002Transportation Group, September 2002
I-75 at Miller Road Operational and Access I-75 at Miller Road Operational and Access Management StudyManagement Study, , Parsons May 6, 2004Parsons May 6, 2004
Traffic and Crash Conditions StudiesTraffic and Crash Conditions Studies , , Wayne State University Wayne State University & Office of Highway Safety Planning, October 11, 2006& Office of Highway Safety Planning, October 11, 2006
Miller Road Background StudiesMiller Road Background Studies
Business Stakeholder InterviewsBusiness Stakeholder Interviews
General Summary of Comments
Prouds
• Popular Shopping and Restaurant’s
• Center turn lane
• Good Traffic Volumes (exposure)
Concerns
• Left Hand Turn Lock Ups
• Near I-75 it is a mess
• Congestion,Backups and Crashes
2025 Vision
• Bad Congestion
• Competition from other Stores & Internet
• Congestion scares away customers
Governments Role in Securing Vision
• Fixing the road
• Possible Service Roads
• Adding more signals
What is Access Management?What is Access Management?
Reduce congestion/delay along the Miller Road corridor;Reduce congestion/delay along the Miller Road corridor; Maintain the traffic carrying capacity of the roadway and delay Maintain the traffic carrying capacity of the roadway and delay
costly capacity improvements where possible;costly capacity improvements where possible; Reduce the number of traffic crashes;Reduce the number of traffic crashes; Identify access management principles to to reduce Identify access management principles to to reduce
delay/improve safety;delay/improve safety; Improve ingress and egress to businesses;Improve ingress and egress to businesses; Coordinate land use decisions; and,Coordinate land use decisions; and, Improve the aesthetic appeal of the Miller Road corridor.Improve the aesthetic appeal of the Miller Road corridor.
A Program to control the location, spacing, design and operation of driveways and street connectors to roadways. The objectives are to:
Example Access Management EffectsExample Access Management Effects
Reduces Stop-and Go Traffic PatternReduces Stop-and Go Traffic Pattern Reduces Delay per Vehicle by 15-20%Reduces Delay per Vehicle by 15-20% Reduces Air Pollution/Fuel Consumption by 5-10%Reduces Air Pollution/Fuel Consumption by 5-10% Reduces Conflict Points/Crash Potential by 20%Reduces Conflict Points/Crash Potential by 20%
Example Access ManagementExample Access ManagementSample Conflict Point DiagramsSample Conflict Point Diagrams
Intersection Traffic Crash DataIntersection Traffic Crash Data
Segment CrashesSegment CrashesTotal Traffic Crashes 2003-2005 per Miller Road Road Segment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
8.0
0
8.2
0
8.4
0
8.6
0
8.8
0
9.0
0
9.2
0
9.4
0
9.6
0
9.8
0
10
.00
10
.20
10
.40
0.20 Mile Segment
To
tal C
ras
he
s
Total Crashes
Lin
de
n R
oa
d (
8.3
2)
Sp
ry (
8.5
5)
Sch
wa
rtz
(8.6
8)
Cu
rtis
(9
.30
)
Ke
tzle
r (9
.39
)
Le
nn
on
(9
.95
)
Mill
er
/SB
-I-7
5 (
10
.15
9)
Mill
er
/NB
-I-7
5 (
10
.30
3)
10
.60
Ba
llen
ge
r (1
0.6
04
)
Traffic DataTraffic DataMiller Road Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
2001 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Da
ily T
raff
ic V
olu
me
(v
pd
)
Between I-75 and Ballenger
Between I-75 and Lennon
West of Lennon
East of Linden
De
cem
be
r 1
2, 2
00
6 A
DT
Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) Locations
Turning Movement Count (TMC) Locations
Task 1- Establish Community Task 1- Establish Community Involvement ProgramInvolvement Program
Vehicle Classification Data
Hourly Traffic DistributionHourly Traffic DistributionMiller Road Between Lennon and I-75 Hourly Distribution
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
01
:00
AM
02
:00
AM
03
:00
AM
04
:00
AM
05
:00
AM
06
:00
AM
07
:00
AM
08
:00
AM
09
:00
AM
10
:00
AM
11
:00
AM
12
:00
PM
01
:00
PM
02
:00
PM
03
:00
PM
04
:00
PM
05
:00
PM
06
:00
PM
07
:00
PM
08
:00
PM
09
:00
PM
10
:00
PM
11
:00
PM
12
:00
AM
Time of Day
Ho
url
y V
olu
me
(v
ph
)
Tuesday December12, 2006
Monday May 24, 2004
Tuesday May 30, 2006
Lennon and Miller Road Turning Lennon and Miller Road Turning MovementsMovements
Synchro Traffic ModelSynchro Traffic Model
Future TrafficFuture Traffic
Population Change (1990-2000) –20%Population Change (1990-2000) –20% Household Change (1990-2000) –18%Household Change (1990-2000) –18% ADT Change/Year (1993-2003) +0.006ADT Change/Year (1993-2003) +0.006 GCMPC/Consultant to run Future Year 2030 GCMPC/Consultant to run Future Year 2030
Traffic Demand on TransCad model Traffic Demand on TransCad model Transit Mode-Share for Work Trips ~1%Transit Mode-Share for Work Trips ~1% Non-motorized TravelNon-motorized Travel
Worse-Case Daily Traffic VolumesWorse-Case Daily Traffic Volumes
Next StepsNext Steps
Late February Public MeetingLate February Public Meeting Draft RecommendationsDraft Recommendations
OperationsOperationsSafetySafetyAccess ManagementAccess ManagementGeometrics/LaneageGeometrics/Laneage
Questions and Comments?Questions and Comments?