mill bay analysis r0

Upload: anonymous-nwbyj9l

Post on 14-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    1/24

    TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD

    NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER STATION

    (STAGE-II 2X600 MW UNIT 1 & 2)

    MILL & BUNKER BUILDING(LOAD CALCULATION)

    DOCUMENT No. PE-DC-307-616-C001REVISION 0

    PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT

    BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITEDNOIDA

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    2/24

    1 OF 24

    01

    111

    -SD- R DSOUZA SACHIN ANIL

    PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT(CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT)

    CALCULATION SUMMARY SHEET

    PROJECT TITLE NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER PROJECT

    JOB NO. 307 DOCUMENT NO. PE-DC-307-616-C001

    BUILDING/SYSTEM MILL & BUNKER BUILDING SHT 1 OF 32

    SUBJECT LOAD CALCULATIONS

    REV

    NO.

    PARTI-

    CULARS

    PREPRD.

    BY

    CHKD.

    BY

    APPD.

    BYREMARKS

    0

    NAME

    SIGN

    DATE

    LP MP RK

    NAME

    SIGN

    DATE

    NAME

    SIGN

    DATE

    REFERENCES

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    3/24

    2

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    GENERAL ......................................................................................................................... 3

    SCOPE ............................................................................................................................... 3

    REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 3

    DESCRIPTION OF BUNKER HOUSE STRUCTURE ............................................... 4

    ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 5

    LOAD CALCULATIONS ................................................................................................ 9

    DEADLOAD.................................................................................................................. 9LIVELOAD......................................................................................................................

    EQUIPMENTLOAD ................................................................................................... 12

    WINDLOADS ............................................................................................................. 14

    SEISMICLOAD ........................................................................................................... 23TEMPERATURELOAD..................................................................................................

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    4/24

    3

    GENERAL

    This document covers the load establishment and analysis of Mill & Bunkerbay structure for 2x600MW North Chennai thermal power plant.

    SCOPE

    This document contains the following

    Structural framing and bracing arrangement of Mill & Bunker structure

    Method of analysis and design basis

    Load cases and Load combinations considered

    Load establishment calculations for 3-Dimensional analysis of Bunkerstructure

    REFERENCES

    The following codes, standards and drawings have been referred

    a) IS:875(1987) part 1 Dead loads

    b) IS:875(1987) part 2 Imposed loads

    c) IS:875(1987) part 3 Wind loads

    d) IS:875(1987) part 5 Load combinations

    e) IS:1893(2002) Criteria for Earthquake resistant design of structures

    f) IS:800(1984) Code of practice for general construction in steel

    g) SP:6 ISI Hand book for structural engineers- structural steel sections

    h) IS:2062 1992 Steel for general structural purposes

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    5/24

    4

    DESCRIPTION OF BUNKER HOUSE STRUCTURE

    Bunker building is of structural steel structure with moment connected framing

    system and bracing in the transverse and longitudinal direction.

    The structrure consists of 5 bays of 9.7m in the longitudinal direction. Span in

    transverse direction is 12.50m.

    Longitudinal Grids are named as M and N

    D 9.7m E 9.7m F 9.7m G 9.7m H 9.7m JN

    X 13.20m

    M

    Z

    On Left side of Bunker i.e. grid NL & ML, there are five mills while on right

    side i.e NR & MR, there are 4 mills. The left side frame NL & ML is

    analysed and applied for 4 mills side MR & NR also by deleting one bayfrom G to H and keeping same nos. of bracings etc. on conservative side.

    Kindly refer drawing for framing arrangemnet attached alongwith.

    Floors :

    Mill maintenance Floor is provided at El 4.581

    Bunker Supporting Floor framing is at El 31.934 (T.O.S)

    Total 5 No Bunkers are Housed in each Bunker House .Storage Capacity of Each Bunker is 1350 tonnes .

    Following are the R.C.C Floors

    Feeder Floor at El 22.515Tripper Floor at El 59.300

    Roof at El 68.890 (Approximate level)

    Cladding of permanent colour coated sandwiched insulated metal claddingsystem is provided from Tripper floor (EL 59.300 m) level to roof (EL 68.890 m).

    No cladding is provided from ground level upto Tripper floor.Thickness of structural RCC floor taken as 150 mm , with an additional 50 mm

    floor finish .

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    6/24

    5

    STRUCTURAL FRAMING ARRANGEMENT

    Framing arrangement for the Bunker building is Moment connected and Braced

    in the transverse direction and bracing in longitudinal direction .

    ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

    A Three dimensional analysis is carried out using STAAD-PRO. A three

    dimensonal mathematical model is created using beam members and plateelements .Plate elements are used to simulate rigid diaphragm action of floor

    slab. The structural steel main frame in the longitudianal direction is analysed

    and designed as axially braced structure with all the applied forces resisted

    through axial tension or compression.

    Bottom of column is considered fixed at base plate level which is considered tobe at EL (-)1.300M for all columns.

    Two plane longitudinal bracing are considered up-to Bunker Supporting level(

    EL 31.934) on M & N rows.

    X-Direction is taken along Transverse Frames

    ( M towards N is taken as Positive X- Direction )

    Z- Direction is taken along Longitudinal Frame( D towards J is taken as Positive Z- Direction )

    Y Axis is taken positive Vertically Upwards.

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    7/24

    6

    LOAD CASES

    The various load cases considered are as follows:

    SL

    NO.

    LOAD CASE

    1. Dead Load DL

    2. Live Load LL

    3. Equipment Load ( including pipe and cable load ) EQPT

    4. Seismic Longitudinal along Z-dir SLZ

    5. Seismic Longitudinal along X-dir SLX

    6. Wind Transverse Load in X-Dir WX+

    7. Wind Transverse Load in negative X-Dir WX-

    8. Wind Longitudinal Load in Z-Dir WZ+

    9. Wind Longitudinal Load in negative Z-Dir WZ-

    10. Temperature Load TL

    DEAD LOAD ( LOAD CASE 1)

    Load Case 1 This Case includes weight of all members modelled in

    STAAD , and calculated by the Program. Basically it includes total weight of

    all Columns , Main Beams . Longitudinal Beams and Bracing Members.This includes self weight of structural elements, dead load due to floor/roof

    slab, finishes, secondary beams( which are not modelled in staad) , parapet

    wall load, cladding, grating, dead weight of various equipment , Bunker etc

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    8/24

    7

    LIVE LOAD ( LOAD CASE 2)

    Live load due to Mill Maintenance Platform is considered under this case.

    Various live loads considered for calculation of loads on Main Frame Beams are asfollows ;(Refer live load as per Technical Specification)

    Feeder Floor = 20 kN/sqm

    Tripper Floor = 20 kN/sqm

    Tripper Roof = 1.5 kN/sqm where there is no equipment and 5KN/m2 at equipmentlocations

    EQT LOAD ( LOAD CASE 3 )

    This includes loading due to Various Equipments on tripeer floor, Fuel Pipeloads , Bunker stored Material load , Monorail Loads , Pipe rack load along

    N row etc . These loads are deemed to be part of SIDL i.e. alongwith deadload and is similarly teated in all loading combinations.

    SEISMIC LOAD ( LOAD CASE 4 & 5)

    The structure is designed for earthquake effects considering Seismic zone

    III of IS:1893-Part-4, with an importance factor of 1.750

    Following load cases are considered for horizontal seismic forces in twoorthogonal directions

    All Dead Loads and Equipment Loads alongwith Live loads are lumped asmasses to generate maximum seismic loads

    Load case 8 Seismic load in X directionLoad case 9 Seismic load in Z direction

    All lateral resisting elemnst are modelled and and response spectrumanalysis is acrried as per IS:1893 Part-4 (For industrial structures)

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    9/24

    8

    WIND LOAD ( LOAD CASE 6 TO 9)

    Wind force on the structure is considered as per the provisions of IS: 875-

    1987 (part 3). Thebasic wind speed of 50 m/sec at a height of 10m above

    the ground level is considered.

    Following cases are considered for wind acting along transverse framedirection

    Load case 4 Wind acting in +ve X direction

    Load case 5 Wind acting in -ve X direction

    Following cases are considered for wind acting along longitudinal frame

    direction

    Load case 6 Wind acting in +ve Z directionLoad case 7 Wind acting in -ve Z direction

    TEMPERATURE LOAD( LOAD CASE 10 )

    The structure is analysed for ambient temperature variation. The temperature

    variation considered is 2/3 of average maximum annual variation in

    temperature. The average maximum annual variation in temperature is taken as

    difference between the mean of daily minimum temperature during the coldestmonth of the year and mean of daily maximum temperature during the hottest

    month of the year. The structure is designed to withstand thermal stresses dueto 50 % of the temperature variation.

    From Specification:-

    Mean of daily maximum temp during the hottest month = 40.0oc

    Mean of daily minimum temp during the coldest month = 22.0oc

    2/3 of average maximum annual variation = c= 12)0.220.40(3

    2

    Design temperature variation = 50% of 12oc = 6oc

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    10/24

    9

    LOAD CALCULATIONS

    The detailed load calculations for various load cases mentioned above are as below.

    DEAD LOAD

    Self weight of the structural elements are defined through built in facility of STAADprogram.

    Dead load calculation on floor slab

    Common data for floor slab

    Dead load due to 150mm thick floor slab. = 0.15 x 25 = 3.75kN/m2

    Dead load due to 50mm thick floor finish .. = 0.05 x 24 = 1.20 kN/m2

    Self weight of secondary beams ( assumed).. = 1.0 kN/m2

    Dead load per m2 of floor slab area ..(3.75+1.20+1.0) = 5.95kN/m2

    UDL on inner main beam of feeder/tripper floor=0.595*9.7=5.78T/m

    UDL on outer main beam of feeder/tripper floor=5.78/2=2.89 T/m

    DL due to projected floor slab=1.25*0.595*9.7=7.21T on each column at

    feeder/tripper floor level.

    Moment due to projected floor slab along longitudinal direction=7.21*0.625=4.5T-m

    on each column

    Moment due to projected floor slab along transverse

    direction=1.25*0.595*7.5*0.625=3.5T-m

    Common data for roof slab

    Dead load due to 150mm thick roof slab = 0.15 x 25 = 3.75kN/m2

    Dead load due to screed and Water-Proofing . = 2.00kN/m2

    Self weight of secondary beams ( assumed).. = 1.00 kN/m2

    Dead load per m2 of roof slab area (3.75+2.00+1.0) = 6.75 kN/m2

    Say 7.50 kN/m2

    Parapet

    150mm thick and 900mm high parapet wall..0.15x0.9x25= 3.375 kN/m

    =0.3375T/m

    UDL on inner main beam of roof slab due to DL =0.75*9.7=7.28T/m

    UDL on outer main beam of roof slab due to DL=7.28/2=3.64T/m

    DL due to projected roof slab and parapet wall=1.25*0.75*9.7+0.3375*9.7=12.38T on

    each column at roof level.

    Moment due to projected roof slab and parapet wall along longitudinal direction on

    inner columns=9.1*0.625+3.28*1.25=10T-m and outer columns=10/2=5T-m

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    11/24

    10

    Moment due to projected roof slab and parapet wall along transversedirection=1.25*0.75*7.5*0.625+0.3375*7.5*1.25=7.6 T-m

    Platforms at EL. 4.581m

    Self Weight of Grating = 0.6 kN/m2 , Beams = 0.75 kN/m2

    Total dead load = 0.6+0.75 = 1.35 kN/m2 =0.135T/m2

    Wt. Of gratings on inner column=0.135*9.7*2=2.7T

    Wt. Of gratings on outer column=2.7/2=1.35T

    DL of duct and floor=1T along N grid at node D & J and 2T at nodes E,F,G&H.

    DL of interconnecting plateform load=8T along N grid at node D&F @ 3 levels viz.,

    Tripper floor, feeder floor and mill platform.

    Metal Sheet cladding

    Weight of Sheet cladding . = 0.15 kN/m2

    Runners = 0.30 kN/m2

    Dead load per m2 of sheeting (0.15+0.30) = 0.45 kN/m2

    Say 0.50 kN/m2

    =0.05T/m2

    Wt. Of sheeting per metre height=0.05*9.7=0.485=0.5T/m2

    Wt. Of sheeting on each column=0.5*12=6T

    Moment along longitudinal direction on inner column=6*1.25=7.5T- m

    Moment along longitudinal direction on outer column=7.5/2=3.75T- m

    Moment along transverse direction on outer column=0.05*7.5*12*1.25=6T- m

    Bunker Dead Load

    Self Weight of Each Bunker including wt of concrete lining = 180 tonnes

    No of Support Points = 6

    Load at Each Support = 180 / 6 = 30 tonnes = 300 kN

    This Load is applied as combination of Joint and Member Loads , based on the

    point of application of Load.

    Dead Load due to Conveyor Gallery

    Conveyor Gallery is assumed to be supported on Brackets from Columns on Grid-J,The supporting beam is taken at a distance of 700mm from Grid-J

    Dead load at each Support Point = 15 tonnes

    Moment on each column = 15*0.70 = 10.5T-m

    This load is applied as joint load on each column of Grid-J at tripper floor level.

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    12/24

    11

    LIVE LOAD

    Roof Slab

    UDL on inner main beam of roof slab due to LL=0.5*9.7=5T/mUDL on outer main beam of roof slab due to LL=5/2=2.5T/m

    LL on each column due to projected roof slab=0.5*9.7*1.25=6T

    Moment due to projected roof slab along longitudinal direction=6*0.625=3.75T- m on each

    column

    Moment due to projected roof slab along transverse direction=0.5*7.5*0.625

    =2.4T- mFeeder/Tripper floor slab

    UDL on inner main beam of floor slab due to LL=2*9.7=19.4T/m

    UDL on outer main beam of floor slab due to LL=19.4/2=9.7T/mLL on each column due to projected floor slab=2*9.7*1.25=24.25T

    Moment due to projected floor slab along longitudinal direction=24.25*0.625=15.2T- m

    on each column

    Moment due to projected floor slab along transverse direction=2*7.5*0.625=9.4T- m

    Platform EL.4.58m

    LL on inner column at the level of gratings=0.5*9.7*2=9.7=10TLL on outer column at the level of gratings=10/2=5T

    LL of duct and floor=2T along N grid at node D & J and 4T at nodes E,F,G&H.

    LL of interconnecting plateform load=10T along N grid at node D&F @ 3 levelsviz., Tripper floor, feeder floor and mill platform

    Monorail Load

    At EL 13.000

    Capacity of Two Nos Underslung Crane = 14 tonnesAdd 10 % Crab weight , and 25 % Impact

    Max Load on each Main Beam = 1.1 x 14.00 x 1.25 = 19.25T say 20T

    At Tripper Roof :

    3t Monorail is required in between Grid-D and Grid-E.

    Load on each beam = 1.5 tAdd 10 % Crab weight , and 25 % Impact

    Max Load on each Main frame Beam = 1.65 x 10 x 1.25 = 20.62 kN say 30 KN

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    13/24

    12

    EQUIPMENT LOAD

    Load due to Conveyor Gallery from TP to Bunker Building

    Conveyor Gallery is assumed to be supported on Brackets from Columns on Grid-J,

    The supporting beam is taken at a distance of 700 mm from Grid-J

    Equipment load at each Support Point = 20 tonnesMoment on column = 20*.7 = 14T-m

    This load is applied as joint load on each column of Grid-J at tripper floor level.

    Bunker Material Load

    Total bulk wt. of coal in bunker = 900 T

    Maximum wt. Of coal in bunker= 1.5*900=1350T

    No of Support Points = 6

    Load at ecah Point = 1350 / 6 = 225T

    FuelPiping Load

    Fuel pipe load along grid-N= 6T at node E, 25T at node F, 29Tat node G , 36T

    at node H and 26T at node J.

    Duct Load

    Duct load along grid-N=15T at node D&E, 14T at nodes F & G, 12T at node H and

    11T at node J.

    Tripper Load

    This load is applied as concentrated load on each tripper girder assuming that wheellies exactly on that girder, contribution of other wheels has been taken proportionally.

    Total equipment load on each girder = 15.5*2=31 T

    Live load considered = 2T/m2

    Load on each Grid = 2*9.7=19.4T/m

    Load on each column = 19.4*6.25= 121.3 T > 31T.

    Feeder Load

    Total Load =2*(4.5+3.5+2)=20T

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    14/24

    13

    Load on outer column= 0.5*20/2=5TLoad on inner column=2*5=10T

    Load due to Bag Fil ters P1, P2, P3, P4

    DL of pedestal = 2*(6.71+7.414+0.583)=29.414T

    Wt. Of duct support = 3*0.4=1.2TStatic Fan Load=1.475T

    Dynamic fan Load= 2TFan support Load=2T

    Total Load=29.414+1.2+1.475+2+2=36T

    Applied as UDL on 12.5 m girder E, F,G&H, so UDL = *36/12.5 = 1.5T/m

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    15/24

    14

    WIND LOADS

    GENERAL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS:

    Wind Load Analysis is done as per Gust Factor Method (Clause 8.0 of IS :875-(Part-3)

    1987 , page 49) .

    a) Gust Wind Calculation

    Calculation of Gust Factor , for Wind in Transverse Direction ( X-Dir)

    Ref Clause 8.0 of IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 49.Basic Wind Speed Vb = 50 m/s

    k1 = 1.08 , k3 = 1.0

    Fz = CfAepz GCalculation Of Gust Factor :

    G = 1 + gf r B[ (1+)2 + SE / ]

    From fig-8 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 50 ,

    For Category-2 , and h = 70 m , gf r = 1.05 & L(h) = 1500

    From page-52 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987

    Cy = 10 , Cz = 12

    For Wind in Transverse Direction , b = 5 * 9.7 = 48.5 m

    Cyb

    = Cz h , = 10 x 48.5 / 12 x 70 = 0.577

    = 0.577

    Cz h 12 x 70

    = = 0.56

    L(h) 1500

    From fig-9 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 50 ,

    For = 0.577 & Czh / L(h) = 0.56 , B = 0.65

    fo = Natural Frequency = 0.422 ( Ref Staad Output )

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    16/24

    15

    Fo = Cz fo h / Vh

    Vh = Vb k1 k2 k3

    From Table-33 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 49 ,

    For h = 70 m , k2 = 0.88 ,Vh = 50 * 1.08 * 0.88 * 1 = 47.52 m/s

    Fo = 12 *0.422* 71 / 47.52 = 7.46

    For Fo = 7.46 and = 0.577 ,

    From fig-10 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 51 ,

    Size Reduction Factor , S = 0.14

    fo L(h) / Vh = 0.422 * 1500 / 47.52 = 13.321

    From fig-11 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 52 ,

    For fo L(h) / Vh = 13.321 , E = 0.09

    = 0.010 For Welded Structures ( Table-34 ) IS: 875 (Patr-3)-1987 = 0 for Category-2 , as per page 50 of IS :875-(Part-3) 1987

    G = 1 + gf r B[ (1+)2 + SE / ]

    G = 1 + 1.05 0.65 + 0.14 * 0.09 / 0.010

    G = 1 + 1.451 = 2.451

    Say G = 2.451 , for Wind in Transverse Direction

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    17/24

    16

    Height(m) k2 vz pz pz*G

    10 0.67 36.18 0.079 0.1925

    15 0.72 38.88 0.091 0.2223

    20 0.75 40.5 0.098 0.2412

    30 0.79 42.66 0.109 0.2676

    40 0.82 44.28 0.118 0.288450 0.85 45.9 0.126 0.3098

    60 0.865 46.71 0.131 0.3209

    70 0.88 47.52 0.135 0.3321

    CLAD PORTION (EL 60 to 70)

    pz T/sqm 0.326

    h m 70

    b m 48.5

    a m 13.2

    h/b 1.44

    a/b 0.27Cf 1.15

    S(spacing of columns) m 9.70

    udl on edge column T/m 2.01

    udl on inner column T/m 3.642

    UNCLAD PORTION EXCLUDING BUNKER

    EL. 50 to 60m

    pz T/sqm 0.315

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.200

    Cf for flat members 1.8

    udl on front outer column T/m 0.551udl on front inner column T/m 1.101

    Solidity ratio for bunker at this level 0.853

    Effective Solidity ratio for bunker at this level 0.5

    Total effective solidity ratio at this level 0.700

    frame spacing ratio 0.278

    shielding factor 0.300

    udl on rear outer column T/m 0.165

    udl on rear inner column T/m 0.330

    EL. 40 to 50m

    pz T/sqm 0.299

    udl on front outer column T/m 0.522udl on front inner column T/m 1.044

    udl on rear outer column T/m 0.157

    udl on rear inner column T/m 0.313

    EL. 30 to 40m

    pz T/sqm 0.278

    udl on front outer column T/m 0.485

    udl on front inner column T/m 0.971

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    18/24

    17

    udl on rear outer column T/m 0.146

    udl on rear inner column T/m 0.291

    EL. 15 to 30mpz T/sqm 0.232udl on front outer column T/m 0.405

    udl on front inner column T/m 0.809Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.200shielding factor 0.800

    udl on rear outer column T/m 0.324

    udl on rear inner column T/m 0.647

    EL. 0 to 15m

    pz T/sqm 0.207

    udl on front outer column T/m 0.362

    udl on front inner column T/m 0.724

    udl on rear outer column T/m 0.290

    udl on rear inner column T/m 0.579

    BUNKER

    EL 50 to 60m

    pz T/sqm 0.315

    Length of bunker m 9.4

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 77.794

    shielding factor for bunker 0.8

    Cf 0.800

    wind load on bunker T 15.701this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no of points of load application isfour.

    Load at each points T 1.963Load on column at top bracing level at outer col. T 1.963

    Load on column at top bracing level at inner col. T 3.925

    EL 40 to 48m

    pz T/sqm 0.299

    Length of bunker m 8.000

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 66.208

    shielding factor for bunker 0.800

    Cf 0.800

    wind load on bunker T 12.674

    this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no of points of load application isfour.

    Load at each points T 1.584

    Load on column at bracing level EL 48m at outer col. T 3.547

    Load on column at bracing level EL 48m at inner col. T 7.094

    EL 32 to 40m

    pz T/sqm 0.278

    Length of bunker m 8.000

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    19/24

    18

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 66.208

    shielding factor for bunker 0.800

    Cf 0.800

    wind load on bunker T 11.780this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no of points of load application is

    four.Load at each points T 1.472

    Load on column at bracing level EL 40m at outer col. T 3.057

    Load on column at bracing level EL 40m at inner col. T 6.113

    Load on column at bracing level EL 32m at outer col. T 1.472

    Load on column at bracing level EL 32m at inner col. T 2.945

    Calculation of Gust Factor , for Wind in Longitudinal Direction ( Z-Dir )

    Ref Clause 8.0 of IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 49.

    Basic Wind Speed Vb = 50 m/s

    k1 = 1.08 , k3 = 1.0

    Fz = CfAe pz G

    Calculation Of Gust Factor :

    G = 1 + gf r B[ (1+)2 + SE / ]

    From fig-8 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 50 ,

    For Category-2 , and h = 70 m , gf r = 1.05 & L(h) = 1500From page-52 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987

    Cy = 10 , Cz = 12

    For Wind in Longitudinal Direction , b = 13.2 m

    Cyb

    = Cz h , = 10 x 13.2 / 12 x 70= 0.157

    = 0.157

    Cz h 12 x 70

    = = 0.56L(h) 1500

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    20/24

    19

    From fig-9 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 50,

    For = 0.157 & Czh / L(h) = 0.56 , B = 0.75

    fo = Natural Frequency = 0.422

    Fo = Cz fo h / Vh

    Vh = Vb k1 k2 k3

    From Table-33 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 49 ,

    For h = 70 m , k2 = 0.88 ,Vh = 50 * 1.08 * 0.88 * 1 = 47.52 m/s

    Fo = 12 *0..422 * 70 / 47.52 = 7.672

    For Fo = 7.672 and =0.157,

    From fig-10 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 51 ,

    Size Reduction Factor , S = 0.24

    fo L(h) / Vh = 0.422 * 1500 / 47.52 = 13.70

    From fig-11 , IS :875-(Part-3) 1987 , page 52 ,

    For fo L(h) / Vh = 13.70 , E = 0.09

    = 0.010 For Welded Structures ( Table-34 ) = 0 for Category-2 , as per page 50 of IS :875-(Part-3) 1987

    G = 1 + gf r B[ (1+)2 + SE / ]

    G = 1 + 1.05 0.75 + 0.24 * 0.09 / 0.010

    G = 1 + 1.791 = 2.791

    Say G = 2.791 , for Wind in Longitudinal Direction

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    21/24

    20

    Height(m) k2 vz pz pz*G

    10 0.67 36.18 0.079 0.219

    15 0.72 38.88 0.091 0.253

    20 0.75 40.5 0.098 0.275

    30 0.79 42.66 0.109 0.305

    40 0.82 44.28 0.118 0.328

    50 0.85 45.9 0.126 0.353

    60 0.865 46.71 0.131 0.365

    70 0.88 47.52 0.135 0.378

    CLAD PORTION (EL 60 to 70)

    pz T/sqm 0.372

    h m 70

    b m 13.2

    a m 48.5

    h/b 5.303

    a/b 3.674

    Cf 1.1

    udl on column T/m 2.904

    UNCLAD PORTION EXCLUDING BUNKER

    EL 50 to 60m

    pz T/sqm 0.359

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.25

    Cf for flat members 1.75

    udl on front column T/m 1.037

    Solidity ratio for bunker at this level 0.627

    Effective Solidity ratio for bunker at this level 0.450

    Total effective solidity ratio at this level 0.700

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor 0.45

    udl on rear column T/m 0.467

    EL 40 to 50

    pz T/sqm 0.341

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.250

    Cf for flat members 1.750

    udl on front column T/m 0.983

    udl on rear column T/m 0.443

    EL 30 to 40m

    pz T/sqm 0.317

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.250

    Cf for flat members 1.750

    udl on front column T/m 0.914

    udl on rear column T/m 0.411

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    22/24

    21

    EL 15 to 30m

    pz T/sqm 0.264

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.250

    Cf for flat members 1.750

    udl on front column T/m 0.762

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor 0.800udl on rear column T/m 0.610

    EL 0 to 15m

    pz T/sqm 0.236

    Solidity ratio for column and bracings 0.250

    Cf for flat members 1.750

    udl on front column T/m 0.682

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor 0.800

    udl on rear column T/m 0.546

    BUNKEREL 48 to 57.4m

    pz T/sqm 0.359

    Length of bunker m 9.400

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 77.794

    shielding factor for frontal bunker 0.75

    Cf 0.8

    wind load on front bunker T 16.7620this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no. of points of load

    application is four.

    Load at each points T 2.095

    Load on front column at top bracing level T 2.095Load on column next to the front column at top bracing level T 3.352

    Solidity ratio for bunker 0.627

    Effective Solidity ratio for bunker 0.450

    Effective Solidity ratio for inner bunker 0.700

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor for inner bunker 0.450

    wind load on rear bunker T 10.057

    Load at each points T 1.257

    Load at rest column at top bracing level except last column T 2.514

    Load at last column at top level T 1.257

    EL 40 to 48mpz T/sqm 0.341

    Length of bunker m 8.000

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 66.208

    shielding factor for frontal bunker 0.750

    Cf 0.800

    wind load on front bunker T 13.530

    this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no of points of load application is four.

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    23/24

    22

    Load at each points T 1.691

    Load on front column at bracing level EL 48m T 3.787

    Load on column next to the front column at level EL 48m T 6.058

    Effective Solidity ratio for inner bunker 0.700

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor for inner bunker 0.450

    wind load on rear bunker T 8.118Load at each points T 1.015

    Load at rest column at bracing level EL. 48m except last column T 4.544

    Load at last column at EL.48m T 2.272

    EL 32 to 40m

    pz T/sqm 0.317

    Length of bunker m 8.000

    Dia. of bunker m 8.276

    frontal area of bunker sqm 66.208

    shielding factor for frontal bunker 0.750

    Cf 0.800

    wind load on front bunker T 12.576this load is applied at two plan bracing levels and at each level, no of points of load application is four.

    Load at each points T 1.572

    Load on front column at bracing level EL 40m T 3.263

    Load on column next to the front column at level EL 40m T 5.221

    Effective Solidity ratio for inner bunker 0.700

    frame spacing ratio 0.735

    shielding factor for inner bunker 0.450

    wind load on rear bunker T 7.545

    Load at each points T 0.943

    Load at rest column at bracing level EL. 40m except last column T 3.916

    Load at last column at EL.40m T 1.958

    Load on front column at level EL.32m T 1.572

    Load on column next to the front column at level EL 32m T 2.515

    Load at rest column at bracing level EL.32m except last column T 1.886

    Load at last column at EL.32m T 0.943

  • 7/27/2019 Mill Bay Analysis r0

    24/24

    SEISMIC LOAD

    GENERAL SEISMIC LOAD CALCULATION:

    Seismic Zone : Zone IIIAs per IS:1893-2002 ,

    Seismic zone factor Z = 0.16Importance factor I = 1.75

    Transverse Frame

    Response reduction factor R=5.00

    Acceleration factor = 0.275

    Longitudinal Frame

    Response reduction factor R=4.00

    Acceleration factor = 0.3434