midwives: by choice or for savings?

4
EE.UU. The expensive health care system generated a large number of women opting for births attended by persons dedicated to this service. Midwives, Midwives, by choice or by choice or for savings for savings ? ? By: María Ximena Plaza [email protected] Bogotá 2007 Few minutes before giving birth, Jennifer* was walking around her apartment, until she leaned against a wall and, while standing up, she delivered a beautiful girl, who still remained in the bag that protected her in the womb. Dawn Rogula, a midwife that travels around Florida, United States, cut the umbilical cord and felt she had accomplished her job: to guarantee the chosen method of labor by the mother, a personalized attention that, according to the midwife, you cannot find in any hospital. In the United States some women prefer bringing their baby to the world with the assistance of a midwife. According to a report carried out by the National Center for Health Statistics and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, between 1979 and 2002, births attended by women dedicated to this service increased from less than one per cent to 8,1 per cent in 2002, although in 2004 it descended to 7,9 percent. Eugene Declercq, professor in the Public Health Department at Boston University, pointed out that midwives assist women, who don’t have any access to health care. He said that the health care system is “private and fragmented” and that most insurance depends on the job you have. If a woman is not working or isn’t related to a small enterprise offering the benefits of insurance, she will have problems to enter to the health care system.

Upload: maria-ximena-plaza

Post on 17-Jul-2015

228 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Midwives: by choice or for savings?

EE.UU. The expensive health care system generated a large number of women opting for births attended by persons dedicated to this service.

Midwives, Midwives, by choice orby choice or for savingsfor savings? ?

By: María Ximena Plaza [email protected] Bogotá 2007 Few minutes before giving birth, Jennifer* was walking around her apartment,

until she leaned against a wall and, while standing up, she delivered a beautiful

girl, who still remained in the bag that protected her in the womb.

Dawn Rogula, a midwife that travels around Florida, United States, cut the

umbilical cord and felt she had accomplished her job: to guarantee the chosen

method of labor by the mother, a personalized attention that, according to the

midwife, you cannot find in any hospital.

In the United States some women prefer bringing their baby to the world with

the assistance of a midwife. According to a report carried out by the National

Center for Health Statistics and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention,

between 1979 and 2002, births attended by women dedicated to this service

increased from less than one per cent to 8,1 per cent in 2002, although in 2004

it descended to 7,9 percent.

Eugene Declercq, professor in the Public Health Department at Boston

University, pointed out that midwives assist women, who don’t have any access

to health care. He said that the health care system is “private and fragmented”

and that most insurance depends on the job you have.

If a woman is not working or isn’t related to a small enterprise offering the

benefits of insurance, she will have problems to enter to the health care system.

Page 2: Midwives: by choice or for savings?

The specialist affirmed that some employers provide a health care package too

expensive, given that they don’t offer any kind of compensation.

Some insurance packages require for women to indicate during renewal if they

are going to use maternity benefits and if so, they must make an additional

payment. If they are expecting a baby without any notification, the pregnancy

has no coverage, said Declerq, though he clarified that the Government offers

supplementary plans such as Medicaid.

According to a study carried out by the Agency for Healthcare Research and

Quality, a natural birth in a hospital may cost more than six dollars and one that

includes a c- section with complications may have a value of more than 16

thousand dollars.

Meanwhile a delivery in a Birth Center, where a large amount of midwives work,

can cost around 1.600 dollars, according to figures from Childbirth Connection.

Childbirth Connection Director, Carol Sakala, assured that a large part of the

population seeks doctors, but in the birth centers “there is no conflict between

what’s the best care for mothers and their babies and the cost of this service.”

Medical Procedures The fear of overcoming medical procedures like a c - section has influenced

women’s choice of a midwife, as this practice does necessarily imply a surgical

intervention , said Rogula.

C-sections increased five percent in 2005, reaching 30,2 percent of all the births

in the nation, a high level, according to preliminary figures of the Center for

Disease Control and Prevention for this year.

The World Health Organization established that no region in the world is

allowed to have a c - section rate superior than 10 to 15 per cent. Therefore the

Page 3: Midwives: by choice or for savings?

United States has tried to decrease it by leading the “Healthy Persons 2010”

campaign, however great advances in this matter have not yet been reported.

Sakala argued that hospitals benefit enormously of the recovery days after the

surgery, more over when it is a planned procedure, in which they can control

the staff of nurses.

“Moms want to receive an attention that doesn’t depend on others interests,

instead according to their own concerns”, she said.

Although, Declrecq pointed out that midwives dedicate more time during and

after the pregnancy, therefore there are more expenses.

He also insisted that the c- section issue is a marginal matter and not a priority

for around four million moms in the United States.Declrecq prefers to attribute

this situation to highly medicated births.

Politics

The cost of medical service is the biggest concern for Americans, according to a

poll carried out by NBC and the Wall Street Journal.

According to Childbirth Connection Director “the system is out of control in

terms of expenses”.

Last week, in an attempt to change this situation, the White House proposed a

deduction of taxes for those who buy private medical insurance, one of the most

important initiatives for this year.

“It’s by far the fair and hoping option, though if you want the Government to be

in charge of everything, this would be a mistake”, U. S President, George W.

Bush, said.

Page 4: Midwives: by choice or for savings?

The tax decrease would be 15 thousand dollars for one family and 7.500 dollars

for individuals who acquire a private insurance. On the other hand, the

insurance sponsored by employers would receive a higher burden.

* The source asked her name to be changed.