micromixer(team 2 afternoon) final
TRANSCRIPT
Team #2With Passive Micro Mixer, comparison performances between three different topics ; 1. Entrance Type, 2.Ostacle, 3. Flowing way 2011. 12. 105142402 Jang, Joon-Hyuk 06142367 Lee, Byung-Joo 08112305 Kim Kyu-RiSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
CONTENTSIntroduction Experimental method Design & Comparison Result and Discussion Entrance Type Obstacle Flowing way
Conclusion ReferencesSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
2
Introduction With the development of MEMS-base, Micro fluidic technology has developed part of chemistry, biotechnology, and other industries for successful application. Micro-mixer can be divided Active method and Passive method Incase of Active method has good efficiency but it has problem ; difficult to built up, using external power(low-economical) However, Incase of Passive has no using external power(Economic), just change internal shape More focused on this study Moreover, Micro size fluidic(laminar flow) so we should consider Reynold number different each Micro-mixer shape. Thus, in this study, we design three different topic of shape(1.Entrance Type, 2.Obstacle, 3.The flowing way) and comparison of performance, Finally finding and generate which shape has the highest efficient.
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
Fabrication- Cleaning - Soft bake Photo lithography - PEB Develop photoregsist 110m - Rinse - SU-8coating - Exposure - Develop - Hard bake - Pre-coating - Molding - Baking - Mold detachment - Plasma treatment - Bonding
PDMS molding Make channel
PDMS bonding Stick on wafer
Tubing
TestSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
4
Photo lithographyCleaning Dipping in Acetone&IPA each for 2min
SU-8 Coating Low spin: 500rpm,5sec High spin: 2000rpm,45sec
Soft Bake 95 c hot plate, 25min.
Exposure Use MA-8(UV: broadband, Iline 365nm)240mJ/cm2 for 6.3 sec
PEB 95 c hot plate,25min.
Develop SU-8 Developer 10min.
Rinse IPA 3min
Inspection Inspect patterns
Hard bake 200 c hot plate, 10min
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
5
PDMS moldingTaping Kapton tape
Pre-coating In vacuum desiccators, trichlorosilane drops 3 times
Molding Mix(Sylgard18430g/hardener3g)
Venting Remove bubble with venting for 30 min
Baking Oven80 C(20min)
Mold Detachment ParafilmFront&back
Punching Punch inlet & outlet
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
6
PDMS bondingPlasma treatment O2:40sccm,A r:8sccm Wafer 2 times, mold 1 time
Splitting wafer Cut in 4 pieces
Cleaning Nitrogen gas
Bonding Drop Alcohol and bonding 60 C 10 min
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
7
Tubing1) PDMS structure tubing 2) Connect tubes to mold with PDMS 3) Oven 15min
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
8
Fabrication Result
#1 Sample
#2 Sample
#3 Sample
#4 Sample
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
9
TestMix Ink & Water - Mixing rate 2ml(Ink) : 4ml(Water) = 1 : 2
Inject Ink Sample #1 & 2 0.05ml/min
Obseve Result
Sample #3 & 4 0.05 - 1.2ml/min
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
10
Experiment Result#1 Sample #2 Sample
#3 Sample
#4 Sample
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
11
Sample Design & Comparison#1 SamplePath Length 26(mm)
#2 SamplePath Length 26(mm)
19.33 (mm)
19.33 (mm)
19.55(mm)
19.55(mm)
#3 Sample
#4 Sample
Design Factors Entrance Type- T-type, Y-Type
26 (mm)
Obstacle22.7 (mm)
- Fin shape, D&S shape
Flowing way- One way, Spread and collect21.7(mm) 20(mm) Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
12
Sample Design & Comparison(Entrance Type)#1 Sample #2 Sample
Comparison Entrance Type Mixing efficiency Sample 1 & 2 : T shape Constrain Sample #3 Sample #4 Same Flow rate : 0.05ml/m Same Viscosity
Sample 3 & 4 : Y shapeSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
13
Result and Discuss(Entrance Type)
Different RGB Value
Sample #1 - T shape
40
Sample #3 - Y shape
T shape - RGBSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
X : Distance Y : RGB
Y shape RGB14
Sample Design & Comparison(Obstacle)#1 Sample #2 Sample
Comparison Obstacle Mixing efficiency Constrain #3 Sample Flow rate : 0.05ml/m #4 Sample Same Same Viscosity Same path length : 23.6cm Sample 1 : Diamond & Square
Sample 2 : Fin shapeSeoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
15
Sample Design & Comparison(Obstacle)#1 Sample : D&S shape #2 Sample : Fin shape
#1 Line #2Line
1st Floor
1st Floor
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
16
Result and Discuss(Obstacle)3rd Floor 2nd Floor 1st Floor #15 Line 1st Floor #13 Line 1st Floor #10 Line 1st Floor #7 Line 1st Floor #4 Line 1st Floor #1 Line
D & S
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
F I N
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
100 (
)
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
17
Result and Discuss(Obstacle)Fin Shape is better than D&SFin shape almost completely Mixed at First Floor(#9 Line)100 ( ) 100 ( )
D&S Shape almost completely Mixed at First Floor(#13 Line)
Fin shape Sample #2
Diamond & Square Sample #1
Y : Different RGB
Why are there small differences? Lopsided flow is existed because of channel shape
Line No. 13 (sample #2)
Outlet (sample #2)
X : Line #18
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
Result and Discuss(Obstacle)Real model
Ideal model
100 (
)
100
Velocity From Fluid outside into the channel of center(layer)Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
Hard Fabrication (Developing step) Small size of obstacle and gap(10 ) Diamond ; 50X45( ) Square ;45 X50( )
100 (
)
19
Sample Design & Comparison(Flowing way)#1 Sample #2 Sample
Comparison Flowing way method Mixing efficiency #3 Sample Constrain #4 Sample Same Obstacle Same Viscosity
Sample 1 & 2 : One way
Sample 2 & 4 : Spread and collect
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
20
Result and Discuss(Flowing Way)Sample 1 : One way Sample 3 & 4 : Spread and collect
same Obstacle
Problems1. A lot of empty space having blocking channel(flow rate did not fulfill total sample volume) 2. Flowing each single color not mixed #3 sample(undiffused at center space) #4 sample(Sub path width is wider(0.1mm) than when we expected)
#3Chamber Volume Flow rate 0.00704 (mL) 0.0008 (mL/s) 1 : 0.11 Main Path Size Sub Path Size 0.2 (mm)
#40.00781 (mL) 0.0008 (mL/s) 1 : 0.1 0.3 (mm) 0.1 (mm) 3:1
Thesis0.00003 (mL) 0.000075 (mL/s) 1 : 2.5 0.05 (mm) 0.007 (mm) 7.14 : 1
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
21
Result and Discuss(Flowing Way) #3
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
22
Result and Discuss(Flowing Way) #4
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
200um
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
23
PossibilityIncreasing Flow rate at #3 SampleWhen we increased Flow rate(0.05ml/m 1.2ml/m), it could increase mixing rate. Moreover, especially Round shape has generate chaos advection at high value of Flow rate(1.2ml/m)
Flow rate : 0.05ml/m
Flow rate : 1.2ml/m
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
24
Conclusion We considered Three different factors(1. Entrance Type 2. Obstacle 3. Flowing way)- Entrance type - Did not affect mixing efficiency between T and Y shape - Obstacle Fin shape is better performance than Diamond and Square shape in terms of mixing rate and Fabrication. - Flowing way One way path have high mixing efficiency than Spread & Collect because of problems ; empty space and flowing each single color not mixed
Moreover, we would expect high mixing rate considering channel proper portion (Chamber Volume : Flow rate, Main Path Size : Sub path size) and obstacle in center space.
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
References1. C. A. Cortes-Quiroz 1,*, A. Azarbadegan 1, E. Moeendarbary (2010), An efficient passive planar micromixer with finshaped baffles in the tee channel for wide Reynolds number flow range 2. Ali Asgar S Bhagat, Erik T K Peterson and Ian Papautsky (2007), A passive planar micromixer with obstructions for mixing at low Reynolds Numbers 3. Li-Yu Tseng, An-Shik Yang, Chun-Ying Lee, Chang-Yu Hsieh (2011), CFD-based Optimization of a diamond-obstacles inserted micromixer with boundary protruions 4. Jin Wook Kim, Sang Woo Kim, Do Hyung Lee, Hyung Min Kang (2010), Study of a Y-Channel Micromixer with Obstacles to Enhancing Mixing 5. Jessica Melin, Guillem Gimnez, Niclas Roxhed, Wouter van der Wijngaart and Gran Stemme (2004), A fast passive and planar liquid sample micromixer
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
26
Thank You
Seoul National University of Technology and Science MSDE Program
27