microcredit-models.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
Bangladesh Grameen Bank (BGB) Model 5 members groups, they must be neighbors but not
relatives Joint Liability Groups (JLG) or Solidarity Groups (SG) Individual lending within JLG model 7 groups constitute a centre at the village level All loans must be approved by other group members
as well as all other centre members Lending is in the order of 2:2:1 (leader being the
last) Every member must contribute Rs. 5/week Inability of a client to pay savings results in the
concerned group or centre paying up for that client
Bangladesh Grameen Bank (BGB) Model 5 % of all productive loans disbursed to a group is
collected as tax and deposited in the group fund From this group fund, member can access loans for
consumption purposes (maximum 75% of group fund), no interest charge
There is also an emergency fund (optional) where each member contribute Rs. 1/week.
Loan disbursement is done at the centre level. Weekly repayment schedule (maximum 52 weeks) Interest rate varies between 15-24 % p.a. on flat
basis and on a weekly basis.
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective Strength for SHG Model
- Flexible internal operations- can select cheaper supplier of funds- can evolve from existing groups- can evolve into Federations- very empowering- a major part of the interest is retained within the group fund
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective Weaknesses of SHG model
- Need management skills- can be hijacked internally or externally- cash may not be secure, if savings are held within the group
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective Strengths of BGB model
- No need for literacy- Protected from internal exploiters- Poorer are included- Bank/MFI can offer tailor-made services- savings are safe- members are forced to accumulate reserves, which can be used in emergencies
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective Weaknesses of BGB model
- inflexible internal operations, very rigid- group composition not in members’ control- must meet frequently (weekly), more time consuming
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective Strength of SHG model
- lower costs, (one account for whole group) and (appraisal, recovery done by members) - groups can fit to any branch- No social intermediation cost as groups are promoted by SHPI- large access to clients
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective Weaknesses of SHG model
- Need SHPI to promote the groups- Groups may move to other bank- more risks as hard to monitor the groups- slow process to increase the scale of business- may be forced to link the groups under some “schemes”
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective Strengths of BGB model
- Tight control over the groups, so less risk- standardized procedures- members have the feelings of ‘belonging’ to bank/MFI
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective Weaknesses of BGB model
- Higher transaction costs- members need continuous guidance and presence- needs dedicated system
SHG Model – Suitable Conditions Existing bank network in rural areas Communities are fragmented, with
various different groups based on caste, or wealth level
There are credible NGOs or other community development institutions to promote the groups
Peoples’ opportunities and financial service needs are diverse
BGB Model – Suitable Conditions The prospective clients are very poor
and marginalized, and are vulnerable to exploitation unless they are protected by a rigid structure
Clients are illiterate The area is densely populated, so that it
is practical for MFI staff to visit the groups every week
The population is fairly homogenous
Federated SHG Model Federation is apex institution of all SHGs
in an area (1000-3000 members) SHG------Cluster------------Federation Federation can be registered under
Society registration Act. Helps in promotion of new SHG and
strengthening of existing SHGs Facilitate inter-group exchange (financial
and non-financial) Access of outside funds to member SHGs
Federated SHG Model As the number of groups increases, it
becomes difficult for SHPI to interact directly with each group
SHPI can start withdrawing and can concentrate on other area
External funds for on-lending are routed through federation
Federation can help SHGs in loan recovery
NBFC Model Profit maximization through financial
services to rural/poor clients Registered as profit making NBFC under
the Companies Act 1956 Diverse client group Multiple channels Sound financial intermediation, no
social intermediation Diversified products for different clients