michigan mission-based performance indicator system · 2016-02-26 · # mi children received...
TRANSCRIPT
Michigan Mission-Based
PIHP Performance Indicator Final ReportJanuary 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012
For Persons with Mental Illness, Developmental Disabilities, Emotional Disturbances, and Substance
Use Disorders
Performance Indicator System
Medicaid Only Population:
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 1 of 65 9/25/2012
90.00
92.00
94.00
96.00
98.00
100.00
102.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 1a: Percentage of Children Receiving a Pre-Admission Screening for Psychiatric Inpatient Care for Whom the Disposition Was Completed Within Three Hours
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 2 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Number of Emergency Referrals
for Children
Number Completed in Three Hours for
ChildrenAccess Alliance 98.18 110 108CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 98.84 86 85CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 59 59Detroit-Wayne 99.76 414 413Genesee 100.00 165 165Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 56 56Lifeways 94.74 19 18Macomb 100.00 410 410network180 98.33 120 118Northern Affiliation 100.00 26 26NorthCare 97.83 46 45Northwest Affiliation 95.65 23 22Oakland 97.58 124 121Saginaw 100.00 71 71Southeast Partnership 100.00 101 101Southwest Alliance 97.85 93 91Thumb Alliance 100.00 38 38Venture 100.00 62 62Total: 2,023 2,009
Indicator 1a: Percentage of Children Receivinga Pre-Admission Screening for Psychiatric Inpatient Care for Whom the Disposition
Was Completed Within Three Hours -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 3 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 1a:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.8198 .38019
Lower Bound 98.0177Upper Bound 99.6219
98.981099.8792
2.6021.61300
94.74100.00
5.262.16
-1.394 .5361.356 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 97.8436 99.8792 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 97.8495 99.8792 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 94 . 7 1.00 95 . 6 .00 96 . 3.00 97 . 588 3.00 98 . 138 1.00 99 . 7 9.00 100 . 000000000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 4 of 65 9/25/2012
92.00
93.00
94.00
95.00
96.00
97.00
98.00
99.00
100.00
101.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 1b: Percentage of Adults Receiving a Pre-Admission Screening for Psychiatric Inpatient Care for Whom the Disposition Was Completed Within Three Hours
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 5 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Number of Emergency Referrals
for Adults
Number Completed in Three Hours for
AdultsAccess Alliance 99.40 335 333CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 95.79 356 341CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 147 147Detroit-Wayne 98.67 1,283 1,266Genesee 100.00 403 403Lakeshore Affiliation 99.10 111 110Lifeways 94.85 97 92Macomb 100.00 756 756network180 99.09 329 326Northern Affiliation 97.18 71 69NorthCare 98.95 191 189Northwest Affiliation 99.32 148 147Oakland 96.54 260 251Saginaw 100.00 247 247Southeast Partnership 100.00 272 272Southwest Alliance 98.97 290 287Thumb Alliance 100.00 201 201Venture 100.00 248 248Total: 5,745 5,685
Indicator 1b: Percentage of Adults Receivinga Pre-Admission Screening for Psychiatric Inpatient Care for Whom the Disposition
Was Completed Within Three Hours -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 6 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 1b:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.7701 .37656
Lower Bound 97.9756Upper Bound 99.5646
98.919899.2117
2.5521.59762
94.85100.00
5.151.70
-1.438 .5361.070 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 98.3020 99.2117 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 98.6750 99.2117 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
3.00 Extremes (=<96.5) 1.00 97 . 1 .00 97 . .00 98 . 3.00 98 . 699 4.00 99 . 0034 .00 99 . 7.00 100 . 0000000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 7 of 65 9/25/2012
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2: Percentage of New Persons Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 8 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Total Persons Received
Assessment Following 1st Request
Total Persons Received
Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 98.91 642 635CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 98.48 656 646CMH for Central Michigan 98.99 497 492Detroit-Wayne 97.28 2,613 2,542Genesee 97.54 487 475Lakeshore Affiliation 98.50 535 527Lifeways 92.75 193 179Macomb 96.79 498 482network180 97.89 1,372 1,343Northern Affiliation 100.00 425 425NorthCare 98.44 321 316Northwest Affiliation 99.57 466 464Oakland 97.82 779 762Saginaw 99.50 202 201Southeast Partnership 100.00 356 356Southwest Alliance 96.54 491 474Thumb Alliance 100.00 501 501Venture 96.51 859 829Total: 11,893 11,649
Indicator 2: The Percentage of New Persons Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days of a
Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 9 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.0835 .41741
Lower Bound 97.2029Upper Bound 98.9642
98.273698.4590
3.1361.77092
92.75100.00
7.252.36
-1.594 .5363.866 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 97.1589 98.4590 99.5214Tukey's Hinges Percentage 97.2828 98.4590 99.5050
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<92.7) 3.00 96 . 557 4.00 97 . 2588 5.00 98 . 44599 2.00 99 . 55 3.00 100 . 000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 10 of 65 9/25/2012
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2a: Percentage of New SED Children Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 11 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# MI Children Received
Assessment Following 1st
Request
# MI Children Received
Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 98.44 192 189CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 99.28 278 276CMH for Central Michigan 99.05 210 208Detroit-Wayne 96.81 783 758Genesee 97.00 100 97Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 132 132Lifeways 97.37 38 37Macomb 90.80 87 79network180 97.32 597 581Northern Affiliation 100.00 147 147NorthCare 100.00 84 84Northwest Affiliation 99.52 208 207Oakland 94.08 152 143Saginaw 100.00 41 41Southeast Partnership 100.00 112 112Southwest Alliance 98.89 180 178Thumb Alliance 100.00 121 121Venture 96.19 289 278Total: 3,751 3,668
Indicator 2a: The Percentage of New Children with Emotional DisturbanceReceiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days
of a Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 12 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2a:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.0415 .58212
Lower Bound 96.8133Upper Bound 99.2696
98.334798.9683
6.0992.46971
90.80100.00
9.203.05
-1.754 .5363.377 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 96.9518 98.9683 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 97.0000 98.9683 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<90.8) 1.00 94 . 0 .00 95 . 2.00 96 . 18 3.00 97 . 033 2.00 98 . 48 3.00 99 . 025 6.00 100 . 000000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I t l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 13 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2b: Percentage of New MI Adults Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 14 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# MI Adults Received Assessment
Following 1st Request
# MI Adults Received
Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 98.62 289 285CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 99.47 188 187CMH for Central Michigan 99.02 204 202Detroit-Wayne 94.36 674 636Genesee 99.47 189 188Lakeshore Affiliation 99.42 173 172Lifeways 85.11 47 40Macomb 97.54 122 119network180 98.40 500 492Northern Affiliation 100.00 164 164NorthCare 98.78 82 81Northwest Affiliation 99.40 166 165Oakland 99.26 272 270Saginaw 100.00 34 34Southeast Partnership 100.00 109 109Southwest Alliance 99.44 178 177Thumb Alliance 100.00 193 193Venture 98.16 380 373Total: 3,964 3,887
Indicator 2b: The Percentage of New Adults with Mental IllnessReceiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days
of a Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 15 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2b:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.1358 .82750
Lower Bound 96.3900Upper Bound 99.8817
98.756199.331112.326
3.5107785.11
100.0014.891.26
-3.405 .53612.438 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 98.3395 99.3311 99.6032Tukey's Hinges Percentage 98.4000 99.3311 99.4709
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
2.00 Extremes (=<94.4) 1.00 97 . 5 2.00 98 . 14 2.00 98 . 67 7.00 99 . 0234444 .00 99 . 4.00 100 . 0000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 16 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2c: Percentage of New DD Children Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 17 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# DD Children Received
Assessment Following 1st Request
# DD Children Received
Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 100.00 6 6CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 100.00 12 12CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 4 4Detroit-Wayne 96.51 86 83Genesee 90.00 10 9Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 5 5Lifeways 66.67 9 6Macomb 88.24 17 15network180 90.91 11 10Northern Affiliation 100.00 9 9NorthCare 92.86 14 13Northwest Affiliation 100.00 12 12Oakland 100.00 33 33Saginaw 91.67 12 11Southeast Partnership 100.00 26 26Southwest Alliance 100.00 17 17Thumb Alliance 100.00 25 25Venture 100.00 14 14Total: 322 310
Indicator 2c: The Percentage of New Children with Developmental DisabilitiesReceiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days
of a Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 18 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2c:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error95.3804 1.96427
Lower Bound 91.2361Upper Bound 99.5246
96.7189100.0000
69.4508.33370
66.67100.0033.338.52
-2.660 .5368.359 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 91.4773 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 91.6667 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<67) 1.00 8 . 8 4.00 9 . 0012 1.00 9 . 6 11.00 10 . 00000000000
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 19 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2d: Percentage of New DD Adults Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 20 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# DD Adults Received Assessment
Following 1st Request
# DD Adults Received
Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 100.00 4 4CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 95.65 23 22CMH for Central Michigan 85.71 7 6Detroit-Wayne 94.95 99 94Genesee 100.00 20 20Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 24 24Lifeways 62.50 8 5Macomb 94.12 34 32network180 96.88 32 31Northern Affiliation 100.00 3 3NorthCare 100.00 12 12Northwest Affiliation 100.00 13 13Oakland 100.00 36 36Saginaw 100.00 17 17Southeast Partnership 100.00 34 34Southwest Alliance 90.48 21 19Thumb Alliance 100.00 25 25Venture 100.00 27 27Total: 439 424
Indicator 2d: The Percentage of New Adults with Developmental DisabilitiesReceiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days of a
Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 21 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2d:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error95.5714 2.16688
Lower Bound 90.9997Upper Bound 100.1431
97.1626100.0000
84.5179.19330
62.50100.0037.505.26
-3.092 .53610.593 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 94.7415 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 94.9495 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
2.00 Extremes (=<86) 3.00 9 . 044 2.00 9 . 56 11.00 10 . 00000000000
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 22 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 2e: Percentage of New Persons with Substance Use Disorders Receiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Request for Service
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 23 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# SA Received Assessment
Following 1st Request
# SA Received Assessment within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 100.00 151 151CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 96.13 155 149CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 72 72Detroit-Wayne 100.00 971 971Genesee 95.83 168 161Lakeshore Affiliation 96.52 201 194Lifeways 100.00 91 91Macomb 99.58 238 237network180 98.71 232 229Northern Affiliation 100.00 102 102NorthCare 97.67 129 126Northwest Affiliation 100.00 67 67Oakland 97.90 286 280Saginaw 100.00 98 98Southeast Partnership 100.00 75 75Southwest Alliance 87.37 95 83Thumb Alliance 100.00 137 137Venture 91.95 149 137Total: 3,417 3,360
Indicator 2e: The Percentage of New Persons with Substance Use DisordersReceiving a Face-to-Face Assessment with a Professional Within 14 Calendar Days of a
Non-Emergent Request for Service -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 24 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 2e:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error97.8699 .80618
Lower Bound 96.1690Upper Bound 99.5708
98.334999.789911.699
3.4203387.37
100.0012.633.58
-2.133 .5364.728 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 96.4203 99.7899 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 96.5174 99.7899 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<87) 1.00 9 . 1 7.00 9 . 5667789 9.00 10 . 000000000
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 25 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3: Percentage of New Persons Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 26 of 65 9/25/2012
PercentageTotal Starting
Ongoing Service
Total Starting Ongoing Service
within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 98.58 565 557CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 96.05 532 511CMH for Central Michigan 96.31 379 365Detroit-Wayne 96.03 2,240 2,151Genesee 98.38 431 424Lakeshore Affiliation 96.53 375 362Lifeways 90.75 227 206Macomb 98.18 494 485network180 89.05 685 610Northern Affiliation 99.37 316 314NorthCare 98.76 322 318Northwest Affiliation 98.47 327 322Oakland 99.40 828 823Saginaw 96.27 161 155Southeast Partnership 98.17 219 215Southwest Alliance 98.25 401 394Thumb Alliance 99.10 442 438Venture 98.00 599 587Total: 9,543 9,237
Indicator 3: The Percentage of New Persons Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment With a
Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 27 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error96.9801 .66678
Lower Bound 95.5733Upper Bound 98.3869
97.286498.1758
8.0032.82892
89.0599.4010.352.41
-1.998 .5363.693 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 96.2181 98.1758 98.6275Tukey's Hinges Percentage 96.2733 98.1758 98.5841
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
2.00 Extremes (=<90.7) 4.00 96 . 0023 1.00 96 . 5 .00 97 . 1.00 97 . 9 5.00 98 . 11234 2.00 98 . 57 3.00 99 . 033
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 28 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3a: Percentage of New SED Children Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 29 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Total MI Children Starting Ongoing
Service
# MI Children Started Ongoing Service within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 97.62 168 164CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 93.95 215 202CMH for Central Michigan 95.81 167 160Detroit-Wayne 93.92 559 525Genesee 98.28 116 114Lakeshore Affiliation 97.65 85 83Lifeways 79.59 49 39Macomb 100.00 73 73network180 89.49 352 315Northern Affiliation 99.06 106 105NorthCare 97.26 73 71Northwest Affiliation 99.22 128 127Oakland 98.89 180 178Saginaw 92.31 26 24Southeast Partnership 98.36 61 60Southwest Alliance 98.37 123 121Thumb Alliance 100.00 99 99Venture 96.43 140 135Total: 2,720 2,595
Indicator 3a: The Percentage of New Children with Emotional Disturbance Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment With a
Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 30 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3a:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error95.8999 1.16762
Lower Bound 93.4364Upper Bound 98.3633
96.578197.633124.540
4.9538079.59
100.0020.414.99
-2.381 .5366.633 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 93.9445 97.6331 98.9308Tukey's Hinges Percentage 93.9535 97.6331 98.8889
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<80) 1.00 8 . 9 3.00 9 . 233 11.00 9 . 56777888899 2.00 10 . 00
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 31 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3b: Percentage of New MI Adults Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 32 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Total MI Adults Starting Ongoing
Service
# MI Adults Started Ongoing Service
within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 99.09 220 218CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 96.00 125 120CMH for Central Michigan 95.92 147 141Detroit-Wayne 94.01 618 581Genesee 98.81 84 83Lakeshore Affiliation 98.85 87 86Lifeways 85.42 48 41Macomb 98.28 116 114network180 93.02 172 160Northern Affiliation 99.09 110 109NorthCare 97.01 67 65Northwest Affiliation 97.32 112 109Oakland 100.00 314 314Saginaw 94.44 18 17Southeast Partnership 95.45 44 42Southwest Alliance 97.26 146 142Thumb Alliance 100.00 157 157Venture 98.83 256 253Total: 2,841 2,752
Indicator 3b: The Percentage of New Adults with Mental Illness Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment With a
Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 33 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3b:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error96.6007 .81992
Lower Bound 94.8708Upper Bound 98.3306
97.033297.290912.101
3.4786285.42
100.0014.583.71
-2.085 .5365.721 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 95.2020 97.2909 98.9107Tukey's Hinges Percentage 95.4545 97.2909 98.8506
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<85.4) 1.00 93 . 0 2.00 94 . 04 2.00 95 . 49 1.00 96 . 0 3.00 97 . 023 4.00 98 . 2888 2.00 99 . 00 2.00 100 . 00
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 34 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3c: Percentage of New DD Children Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 35 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Total DD Children Starting Ongoing
Service
# DD Children Started Ongoing Service within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 83.33 6 5CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 85.71 7 6CMH for Central Michigan 75.00 4 3Detroit-Wayne 85.71 70 60Genesee 100.00 12 12Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 2 2Lifeways 84.62 13 11Macomb 88.00 25 22network180 83.33 12 10Northern Affiliation 100.00 9 9NorthCare 100.00 11 11Northwest Affiliation 100.00 7 7Oakland 100.00 34 34Saginaw 87.50 8 7Southeast Partnership 100.00 12 12Southwest Alliance 91.67 12 11Thumb Alliance 100.00 19 19Venture 91.67 12 11Total: 275 252
Indicator 3c: The Percentage of New Children with Developmental Disabilities Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent
Assessment With a Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 36 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3c:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error92.0302 1.91420
Lower Bound 87.9916Upper Bound 96.0688
92.533691.666765.955
8.1212575.00
100.0025.0014.56-.405 .536
-1.016 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 85.4396 91.6667 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 85.7143 91.6667 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
.00 7 . 1.00 7 . 5 3.00 8 . 334 4.00 8 . 5578 2.00 9 . 11 .00 9 . 8.00 10 . 00000000
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 37 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3d: Percentage of New DD Adults Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 38 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Total DD Adults Starting Ongoing
Service
# DD Adults Started Ongoing Service within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 100.00 2 2CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 88.89 18 16CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 5 5Detroit-Wayne 91.75 97 89Genesee 100.00 18 18Lakeshore Affiliation 88.24 17 15Lifeways 81.82 11 9Macomb 90.24 41 37network180 82.14 28 23Northern Affiliation 100.00 2 2NorthCare 100.00 19 19Northwest Affiliation 92.86 14 13Oakland 100.00 47 47Saginaw 100.00 12 12Southeast Partnership 95.45 22 21Southwest Alliance 100.00 15 15Thumb Alliance 100.00 20 20Venture 100.00 16 16Total: 404 379
Indicator 3d: The Percentage of New Adults with Developmental Disabilities Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment
With a Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 39 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3d:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error95.0774 1.52327
Lower Bound 91.8636Upper Bound 98.2912
95.5406100.0000
41.7666.46270
81.82100.0018.1810.09-.986 .536-.291 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 89.9051 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 90.2439 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
2.00 8 . 12 2.00 8 . 88 3.00 9 . 012 1.00 9 . 5 10.00 10 . 0000000000
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 40 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 3e: Percentage of New Persons with Substance Abuse Disorders Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent Assessment with a Professional
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 41 of 65 9/25/2012
PercentageTotal SA Starting Ongoing Service
# SA Started Ongoing Service
within 14 Calendar Days
Access Alliance 99.41 169 168CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 100.00 167 167CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 56 56Detroit-Wayne 100.00 896 896Genesee 98.01 201 197Lakeshore Affiliation 95.65 184 176Lifeways 100.00 106 106Macomb 100.00 239 239network180 84.30 121 102Northern Affiliation 100.00 89 89NorthCare 100.00 152 152Northwest Affiliation 100.00 66 66Oakland 98.81 253 250Saginaw 97.94 97 95Southeast Partnership 100.00 80 80Southwest Alliance 100.00 105 105Thumb Alliance 97.28 147 143Venture 98.29 175 172Total: 3,303 3,259
Indicator 3e: The Percentage of New Persons with Substance Use Disorders Starting any Needed On-going Service Within 14 Days of a Non-Emergent
Assessment With a Professional -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 42 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 3e:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.3158 .87583
Lower Bound 96.4680Upper Bound 100.1637
99.0011100.0000
13.8073.71584
84.30100.0015.702.01
-3.516 .53613.426 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 97.9920 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 98.0100 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<84.3) 1.00 95 . 6 .00 96 . 2.00 97 . 29 3.00 98 . 028 1.00 99 . 4 10.00 100 . 0000000000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
SkewnessKurtosis
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile Range
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 43 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 4a(1): Percentage of Children Discharged from a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within 7 Days
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 44 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# Children Discharged from
Psychiatric Inpatient Unit
# Children Seen for Follow-up Care within 7 Days
Access Alliance 100.00 29 29CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 100.00 11 11CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 9 9Detroit-Wayne 100.00 178 178Genesee 100.00 37 37Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 15 15Lifeways 82.35 17 14Macomb 95.56 90 86network180 87.88 33 29Northern Affiliation 100.00 21 21NorthCare 94.44 18 17Northwest Affiliation 100.00 14 14Oakland 97.14 35 34Saginaw 100.00 17 17Southeast Partnership 100.00 32 32Southwest Alliance 88.89 27 24Thumb Alliance 100.00 19 19Venture 100.00 9 9Total: 611 595
Indicator 4a(1): The Percentage of Children Discharged from a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within
7 Days -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 45 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 4a(1):
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error97.0146 1.25265
Lower Bound 94.3718Upper Bound 99.6575
97.6633100.0000
28.2455.31456
82.35100.0017.654.72
-1.830 .5362.538 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 95.2778 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 95.5556 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
3.00 Extremes (=<88.9) 1.00 94 . 4 1.00 95 . 5 .00 96 . 1.00 97 . 1 .00 98 . .00 99 . 12.00 100 . 000000000000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 46 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 4a(2): Percentage of Adults Discharged from a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within 7 Days
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 47 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# Adults Discharged from Psychiatric
Inpatient Unit
# Adults Seen for Follow-up Care within 7 Days
Access Alliance 98.97 97 96CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 100.00 74 74CMH for Central Michigan 97.06 34 33Detroit-Wayne 97.89 855 837Genesee 97.66 128 125Lakeshore Affiliation 97.78 45 44Lifeways 92.86 56 52Macomb 96.91 194 188network180 92.31 130 120Northern Affiliation 100.00 36 36NorthCare 98.00 50 49Northwest Affiliation 95.92 49 47Oakland 96.08 153 147Saginaw 90.63 32 29Southeast Partnership 100.00 69 69Southwest Alliance 96.74 92 89Thumb Alliance 97.50 80 78Venture 96.83 63 61Total: 2,237 2,174
Indicator 4a(2): The Percentage of Adults Discharged from a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within
7 Days -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 48 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 4a(2):
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error96.8397 .61424
Lower Bound 95.5438Upper Bound 98.1357
97.009497.2794
6.7912.60602
90.63100.00
9.382.20
-1.080 .536.914 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 96.0384 97.2794 98.2423Tukey's Hinges Percentage 96.0784 97.2794 98.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
3.00 Extremes (=<92.9) 1.00 95 . 9 4.00 96 . 0789 5.00 97 . 05678 2.00 98 . 09 .00 99 . 3.00 100 . 000
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 49 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 4b: Percentage of Discharges from a Substance Abuse Detox Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within 7 Days
95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 50 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# SA Discharged from Substance Abuse
Detox Unit
# SA Seen for Follow-up Care within 7 Days
Access Alliance 100.00 16 16CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 100.00 20 20CMH for Central Michigan 100.00 11 11Detroit-Wayne 100.00 218 218Genesee 98.15 54 53Lakeshore Affiliation 100.00 20 20Lifeways 100.00 18 18Macomb 100.00 58 58network180 100.00 18 18Northern Affiliation 100.00 8 8NorthCare 100.00 8 8Northwest Affiliation 100.00 10 10Oakland 100.00 25 25Saginaw 100.00 17 17Southeast Partnership 82.50 40 33Southwest Alliance 96.43 28 27Thumb Alliance 91.89 37 34Venture . 0 0Total: 606 594
Indicator 4b: The Percent of Discharges from a Substance Abuse Detox Unit Who are Seen for Follow-up Care Within 7 Days -- 95% Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 51 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 4b:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 17 .9 1 .1 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error98.1746 1.10402
Lower Bound 95.8342Upper Bound 100.5150
98.9440100.0000
20.7214.55200
82.50100.0017.50
.93-3.023 .5509.510 1.063
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 99.0741 100.0000 100.0000Tukey's Hinges Percentage 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
4.00 Extremes (=<98) 13.00 1 . 0000000000000
Stem width: 100.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 52 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 5: Percentage of Area Medicaid Recipients Having Received PIHP Managed Services
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 53 of 65 9/25/2012
PercentageTotal Medicaid
Beneficiaries Served# of Area Medicaid
RecipientsAccess Alliance 9.65 6,034 62,525CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 6.87 6,961 101,365CMH for Central Michigan 9.70 4,405 45,424Detroit-Wayne 7.54 34,903 462,792Genesee 7.36 7,153 97,212Lakeshore Affiliation 5.60 3,855 68,794Lifeways 7.58 2,891 38,160Macomb 5.96 7,202 120,839network180 7.14 7,563 105,909Northern Affiliation 7.84 3,909 49,852NorthCare 7.79 3,707 47,565Northwest Affiliation 8.28 3,923 47,372Oakland 8.58 11,243 131,087Saginaw 5.65 2,459 43,542Southeast Partnership 6.45 5,525 85,660Southwest Alliance 7.40 5,929 80,141Thumb Alliance 8.50 4,224 49,714Venture 7.52 7,049 93,798Total: 128,935 1,731,751
Indicator 5: Percentage of Area Medicaid Recipients Having Received PIHP Managed Services
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 54 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 5:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error7.5220 .27701
Lower Bound 6.9376Upper Bound 8.1064
7.50777.52851.381
1.175255.609.704.091.57.143 .536
-.151 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 6.7629 7.5285 8.3351Tukey's Hinges Percentage 6.8673 7.5285 8.2813
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
3.00 5 . 669 2.00 6 . 48 8.00 7 . 13355578 3.00 8 . 245 2.00 9 . 66
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 55 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 6 (old #8): Percentage of Habilitation Supports Waiver (HSW) Enrollees in the Quarter Who Received at Least One HSW Service Each Month Other Than Supports
Coordination
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 56 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
# of HSW Enrollees Receiving at Least One HSW Service
Other Than Supports Coordination
Total Number of HSW Enrollees
Access Alliance 95.63 350 366CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 97.30 360 370CMH for Central Michigan 98.89 534 540Detroit-Wayne 96.90 1,155 1,192Genesee 97.87 368 376Lakeshore Affiliation 98.74 235 238Lifeways 92.31 240 260Macomb 98.35 478 486network180 95.76 158 165Northern Affiliation 96.04 412 429NorthCare 98.06 354 361Northwest Affiliation 96.70 176 182Oakland 98.58 835 847Saginaw 100.00 117 117Southeast Partnership 81.17 569 701Southwest Alliance 90.89 419 461Thumb Alliance 99.29 279 281Venture 98.13 315 321Total: 7,354 7,693
Indicator 6 (old #8): The Percent of Habilitation Supports Waiver (HSW) Enrollees in the Quarter Who Received at Least One HSW Service Each Month Other Than Supports
Coordination
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 57 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 6:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error96.1447 1.03794
Lower Bound 93.9548Upper Bound 98.3346
96.762597.584819.392
4.4036181.17
100.0018.832.90
-2.624 .5367.931 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 95.7253 97.5848 98.6223Tukey's Hinges Percentage 95.7576 97.5848 98.5832
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
2.00 Extremes (=<90.9) 1.00 92 . 3 .00 93 . .00 94 . 2.00 95 . 67 3.00 96 . 078 2.00 97 . 28 6.00 98 . 013578 1.00 99 . 2 1.00 100 . 0
Stem width: 1.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 58 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 10a (old #12a): Percentage of Children Readmitted to Inpatient Psychiatric Units Within 30 Calendar Days of Discharge From a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit
15% or Less Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 59 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Number of Children Discharged from Inpatient Care
# Children Discharged that were Readmitted Within 30 Days
Access Alliance 20.59 34 7CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 0.00 14 0CMH for Central Michigan 11.11 9 1Detroit-Wayne 13.00 277 36Genesee 14.29 56 8Lakeshore Affiliation 4.00 25 1Lifeways 11.76 17 2Macomb 7.29 96 7network180 8.57 35 3Northern Affiliation 10.00 30 3NorthCare 9.09 22 2Northwest Affiliation 16.67 18 3Oakland 6.56 61 4Saginaw 4.17 24 1Southeast Partnership 14.71 34 5Southwest Alliance 5.41 37 2Thumb Alliance 0.00 23 0Venture 0.00 11 0Total: 823 85
Indicator 10a (old #12a): The Percentage of Children Readmitted to Inpatient Psychiatric Units Within 30 Calendar Days of Discharge From a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit -- 15% or
Less Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 60 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 10a (old #12a):
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error8.7335 1.39410
Lower Bound 5.7922Upper Bound 11.6747
8.56008.831234.983
5.91465.00
20.5920.599.19.134 .536
-.536 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 4.1250 8.8312 13.3187Tukey's Hinges Percentage 4.1667 8.8312 12.9964
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
5.00 0 . 00044 5.00 0 . 56789 6.00 1 . 011244 1.00 1 . 6 1.00 2 . 0
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 61 of 65 9/25/2012
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Perc
enta
ge
PIHP
Indicator 10b (old #12b): Percentage of Adults Readmitted to Inpatient Psychiatric Units Within 30 Calendar Days of Discharge From a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit
15% or Less Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 62 of 65 9/25/2012
Percentage
Number of Adults Discharged from Inpatient Care
# Adults Discharged that were Readmitted Within 30 Days
Access Alliance 9.73 113 11CMH Affiliation of Mid-Michigan 13.33 90 12CMH for Central Michigan 7.14 42 3Detroit-Wayne 11.91 1,385 165Genesee 10.22 186 19Lakeshore Affiliation 11.48 61 7Lifeways 22.81 57 13Macomb 21.43 224 48network180 14.69 143 21Northern Affiliation 10.53 57 6NorthCare 13.85 65 9Northwest Affiliation 16.13 62 10Oakland 13.09 191 25Saginaw 7.84 51 4Southeast Partnership 7.14 84 6Southwest Alliance 14.43 97 14Thumb Alliance 14.42 104 15Venture 2.44 82 2Total: 3,094 390
Indicator 10b (old #12b): The Percentage of Adults Readmitted to Inpatient Psychiatric Units Within 30 Calendar Days of Discharge From a
Psychiatric Inpatient Unit -- 15% or Less Standard
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 63 of 65 9/25/2012
Explore Indicator 10b:
N Percent N Percent N PercentPercentage 18 1.0 0 .0 18 1.0
Statistic Std. Error12.3671 1.16082
Lower Bound 9.9179Upper Bound 14.8162
12.338612.501224.255
4.924942.44
22.8120.375.23.320 .536.747 1.038
25 50 75Weighted Average(Definition 1) Percentage 9.2617 12.5012 14.4961Tukey's Hinges Percentage 9.7345 12.5012 14.4330
Percentage
Percentage Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf
1.00 Extremes (=<2) 4.00 0 . 7779 10.00 1 . 0011333444 1.00 1 . 6 1.00 2 . 1 1.00 Extremes (>=23)
Stem width: 10.00 Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Descriptives
Percentage Mean95% Confidence I l f 5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Percentiles
Percentiles
VarianceStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumRangeInterquartile RangeSkewness
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 64 of 65 9/25/2012
Data is not available for this indicator at this time.
Indicator 15: The Percent of Children with Developmental Disablities Served Who Recieived at Least One Service Each Month of the Quarter
*Excludes Children Enrolled in the Children's Waiver Program*
2nd Quarter 2012 Final Report Page 65 of 65 9/25/2012