michigan agriculture logistics and supply chain: current state … · 2014-02-18 · michigan state...
TRANSCRIPT
Michigan State University, 2013
Michigan Agriculture Logistics
and Supply Chain: Current State
and Future Potential
Michigan Farm Bureau
Lansing Legislative Seminar
Frederick A. Rodammer, Ph.D.
The Eli Broad College of Business
Michigan State University
February 12, 2014
Michigan State University, 2013 - 2 -
Lansing Legislative Seminar – Presentation Outline
• The complexity of supply chains and the end to end
supply chain
• State of Michigan Logistics and Supply Chain Strategy
• Current issues associated with Michigan Agriculture
logistics and supply chain
• Michigan Agriculture supply chain assessment and
strategy recommendations project
Michigan State University, 2013 - 3 -
FARM
INPUTS
ANIMAL
PRODUCTION
CROP
PRODUCTION
FARM
PRODUCT
ASSEMBLERS
INGREDIENT
PROCESSORS
END-PRODUCT
PROCESSORS
WHOLESALERS
RETAILERS
CONSUMERS
seed
feed
fertilizer
pesticides
meat & poultry
dairy
fish & seafood
eggs
grains
oil seeds
fruits
vegetables
grain
elevators
shippers
feed lots
milling
slaughtering
crushing
starches
flavorings
fresh products
prepared products
general home
specialty products
food service
supermarkets
convenience stores
co-op
restaurants
hotels
schools
hospitals
military bases
vending
farmer’s markets
community feeding
T
T
T
T
T
T T
T
T
T Transportation of products between
stages in the system.
MULTIPLE FARM
SOURCES
MULTIPLE FARM
SOURCES STORAGE
T
T
Example: Complexity In The Food Supply Chain
Adapted from Bruce Hope, (April 13, 2005), “Identifying
Research Needs for Risk Assessment of U.S. Food Supply
Security,” Society of Toxicology - Risk Assessment Specialty
Section (RASS) Monthly Teleconference.
Michigan State University, 2013 - 4 -
Food System Complexity
Prepared by Shaun Kennedy – Do Not Reproduce Without Permission
Michigan State University, 2013 - 5 -
baking soda
wheat gluten
calcium propionate
enzymes
bleached wheat flour mono- and diglycerides
malted barley flour diacetyl tartaric acid esters
thiamine ethanol
riboflavin sorbitol
Niacin polysorbate 20
folic acid potassium propionate
reduced iron sodium stearoyl lactylate
Water corn starch
corn syrup ammonium chloride
sesame seeds ammonium sulfate
soybean oil calcium peroxide
Yeast ascorbic acid
Salt azodicarbonamide
calcium sulfate
calcium carbonate
calcium silicate
soy flour
USDA inspected beef
Milk milkfat
Water cream
sodium citrate salt
sodium phosphate sorbic acid
artificial color cheese culture
acetic acid soy lecithin
Enzymes starch
Special Sauce
Soybean oil pickles
distilled vinegar water
egg yolks HF corn syrup
sugar onion powder
corn syrup spice
spice extractives salt
xanthan gum mustard flour
prop. glycol alginate sodium benzoate
potassium sorbate mustard bran
garlic powder hydrolyzed proteins
caramel color paprika
Turmeric calcium disodium
EDTA
Cucumbers
water
Vinegar
Salt
calcium chloride
Alum
natural flavorings
polysorbate 80
turmeric
Grill Seasoning
Salt
Pepper
cottonseed oil
soybean oil
Food System Complexity
One Burger Contains:
lettuce dehydrated onions Prepared by Shaun Kennedy – Do Not Reproduce Without Permission
Michigan State University, 2013 - 6 -
End-to-End Integrated Supply Chain Model
SUPPLY
NETWORK
Information, Product, Service, Financial and Knowledge Flows
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Capacity, Information, Core Competencies, Capital and Human Resources
Relationship Management
Procurement
Manufacturing
E
N
D
C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
S
INTEGRATED
ENTERPRISE MARKET
DISTRIBUTION
NETWORK
Logistics
Order
Administration
Michigan State University, 2013 - 7 -
End-to-End Integrated Supply Chain
Total Cost Analysis Approach Cost
Components
Sourcing +
Production +
Handling +
Inbound Transport +
DC Handling +
Inventory +
Customer Transport +
Duties and Taxes
____________
Total Cost
Dealers
State of MI Supply Chain and
Logistics Strategy Focus
• Lower Cost
• Reduce Time
• Remove Risk
Michigan State University, 2013 - 9 -
MI Supply Chain and Logistics Strategy Objectives
• Enable logistics and supply chain solutions to create
more and better jobs.
• Collaborate with industry and regional partners to identify
and prioritize initiatives to improve regional
competitiveness
• Develop strategic marketing programs and campaigns
that promote Michigan’s supply chain capabilities and
leverage its location and natural resources.
• Prioritize infrastructure and policy initiatives that will
increase our competitive advantage, reduce cost, save
time, and support value-added supply chain activity.
• Support the growth of Michigan’s industry with world-
class supply chain infrastructure and talent.
Our Michigan TDL Advantage
Infrastructure Location
Industry Supply Chain
Capability
Michigan State University, 2013 - 11 -
Industry
• Automotive
• Agriculture, livestock and food processing
• Automotive
• Bio-energy
• Durable equipment and component parts
• Medical
• Office furniture
• Specialty chemicals
Michigan State University, 2013 - 12 -
Michigan Agriculture Supply Chain Project
• Purpose: Complete an overall end-to-end supply chain
assessment of key commodity segments of Michigan
agriculture, identify major infrastructure constraints, and
provide recommendations and rationale for critical
investments to improve Michigan’s economic
competitiveness and job creation opportunities.
• Commodities: Bean, Corn, Wheat, Soybean
Michigan State University, 2013 - 13 -
Project Stakeholders
• Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee
• Corn Marketing Program of Michigan
• Michigan Wheat Program
• Michigan Bean Commission
• Michigan Farm Bureau
• MSU Department of Supply Chain Management
• MSU Product Center
• MDARD
• MEDC
• MDOT
Michigan State University, 2013 - 14 -
Current Issues (Opportunities for Improvement)
• Fertilizer Price Increase
• Need for Michigan-based Food/Feed processing Sites
• Need for Michigan-based Animal Processing Sites
• Border Congestion
• Exports and Value Chain
Michigan State University, 2013 - 15 -
Project Focus and Value
• FOCUS: End to end agriculture supply chain which begins
with the purchase and application of fertilizers, continues
with the harvest and the movement of products from the
field to processing locations, continues with food/feed
processing, and ends with the sale of processed product
for animal livestock or the end consumer.
• VALUE: Reduced cost or cost avoidance for all
stakeholders, improved service for the agricultural supply
chain by reducing cycle times and delays for transport and
processing, reduced supply chain risks for all
stakeholders, and creation of new jobs for Michigan.
Michigan State University, 2013 - 16 -
Project Scope: End to End Supply Chain
Purchase & Application
Harvest
Transport & Movement
Processing I – Food/Feed
Processing II – Animal Processing
Sale – Domestic and Export
Michigan State University, 2013 - 17 -
End-to-End Integrated Supply Chain Model
SUPPLY
NETWORK
Information, Product, Service, Financial and Knowledge Flows
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Capacity, Information, Core Competencies, Capital and Human Resources
Relationship Management
Procurement
Manufacturing
E
N
D
C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
S
INTEGRATED
ENTERPRISE MARKET
DISTRIBUTION
NETWORK
Logistics
Order
Administration
Michigan State University, 2013 - 18 -
Project Phases and Completion Date
Phase I Project Charter, Work Plan,
Resources
Completed
Phase 2 Data Collection In Progress
Phase 3 Analysis & Process Modeling
Phase 4 Develop SCM Recommendations
Phase 5 Validate Recommendation
Phase 6 Implementation Planning Project Completion
Date of 2Q, 2015
LEVERAGE RESULTS: Recommendations for will be shared and leveraged to
other Michigan agriculture crops.
Michigan State University, 2013
Michigan Agriculture Logistics
and Supply Chain: Current State
and Future Potential
Michigan Farm Bureau
Lansing Legislative Seminar
Frederick A. Rodammer, Ph.D.
The Eli Broad College of Business
Michigan State University
February 12, 2014