michael r. hadskis assistant professor, dalhousie law school
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Michael R. HadskisAssistant Professor, Dalhousie Law SchoolIWK Kermesse Scholar, Health Law InstituteCo-investigator, CIHR Neuroethics NET
Ethics of Neuroimaging Research Involving Children
![Page 2: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sponsor and NET Investigator Affiliations
![Page 3: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• “Neuroimaging pediatric patients is accompanied by all the ethical dilemmas associated with neuroimaging in adults, magnified exponentially.” [Hinton, 2002]
![Page 4: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
• MRI research involving children, with and without neurological disorders, presents difficult issues: o Consento Balancing harms and benefitso Privacy and confidentialityo Unanticipated (incidental) findingso Interpreting scan datao Allocation of public resources
![Page 5: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
• Neuroethics New Emerging Team (NET) Grant - “Neuroimaging Ethics: From Theory to Practice”
• Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction (INMHA), CIHR
![Page 6: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
• Talk outline:o Consent challenges
Informed consent (risk disclosure) Capacity to consent
o Unanticipated findings
• My thesis
![Page 7: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Consent Challenges
• To be legally and ethically valid, consent to participate in research must be voluntarily given by persons competent to make such decisions, after they have been properly informed of all relevant information
![Page 8: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Consent Challenges: Consent Must be Informed
• Legal standards for informed consent in the research context:o Research with no intended benefits for the participants:
“…full and frank disclosure” of all information “which a reasonable person might be expected to consider” Halushka v. University of Saskatchewan
Disclosure of all risks, even those that are rare and remote Weiss v. Soloman
o Research with intended benefits for participants – law is unclear
![Page 9: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Consent Challenges: Consent Must be Informed
• Ethical standards for informed consent in the research context: “…full and frank disclosure of all relevant information”Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS)
![Page 10: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Consent Challenges: Consent Must be Informed
• MRI research disclosure obligations include (among others):o Nature and purpose of MRI studyo Benefits, if any, of participating in MRI studyo Risks of participating in MRI study
![Page 11: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Informing About Physical Risks
• Disclosure of physical risks related to:o Metal projectileso Embedded metallic objectso Interference with implanted electronic/magnetic
deviceso Physiological responses to magnetic fieldso Acoustic noiseo Sedation/anesthesiao Contrast agentso Additional diagnostic interventions (re: unanticipated
findings)
![Page 12: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Informing About Psychological Risks
• Psychological harms arising from situational characteristics (e.g., noise and small bore size)
• Populations at greater risk of psychological harm (e.g., some children and some persons with mental disorders)
• Distress/anxiety related to unanticipated findings
![Page 13: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Template Text for Potential Harms Section of Consent Forms
• Template for the disclosure of MRI research risks in consent forms: www.neuroethics.ca
• Comments on template would be greatly appreciated: [email protected]
![Page 14: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Consent Challenges: Consent Must be Given by Competent Persons
• Competency assessment:o Test – Ability to understand the information
presented and to appreciate the potential consequences of the decision to participate (“mature minor”)
o Provincial variation regarding law on competence
o Functional assessment (not global or static)o Who will do the assessment and how will it be
done?
![Page 15: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Consequences of Finding a Child Incompetent
• If the child is incompetent, according to the TCPS:o Voluntary and informed consent must be sought
from child’s parent/guardian (“best interests”)o The research question can only be addressed using
the target populationo The research cannot expose child to more than
“minimal risks” without the potential for direct benefits for him/her, but note: Eve v. E. Civil Code of Quebec, Article 21
o Child’s assent may be required
![Page 16: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Unanticipated Findings
• Unanticipated findings in MRI research are not rare:o Study of unanticipated findings in 225 healthy
children 47 (21%) abnormalities detected Of them, 17 (36%) merited routine medical referral And 1 (2%) required urgent referral
o Other studies involving MRI scans of healthy children and adults (controls) Unanticipated findings in 20-50% of scans 1-8% having clinically significant findings
![Page 17: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Disclosure of Potential for Unanticipated Findings
• Disclosure of information relevant to unanticipated findings:o Possibility of making such findings:
Depends on who is reviewing the scans (MRI technologist vs. paediatric neuroradiologist)
Depends on scan type (research or diagnostic-grade)o Associated risks (and benefits):
Anxiety Further tests and unpleasant treatments/complications Stigmatization and impact on insurability
o Management plan to deal with unanticipated findings
![Page 18: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Need for Unanticipated Findings Management Plan
• Many MRI researchers are unprepared:o Study of MRI researchers’ practices – only
50% of respondents had management plan
![Page 19: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Possible Unanticipated Findings Management Plan
• Possible management plan: o Advise participant/SDM of absence of diagnostic
expertise and that scan is not optimized to detect abnormalities
o Advise that if a finding “seems possibly” abnormal to the investigator, a referral will be made to a neuroradiologist: Fact of referral will not be disclosed at this juncture Latency of the neuroradiological review Considerations: (1) expense/availability of expert
consultation; (2) investigator’s exposure to liability (negligence); and (3) therapeutic misconception
![Page 20: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Possible Unanticipated Findings Management Plan Con’t
• Neuroradiologist reviews scan and determines whether it merits recommending medical referralo Pre-define what kinds of possible
abnormalities will merit referralo Considerations: (1) neuroradiologist’s
exposure to liability (negligence); (2) confirm CMPA coverage; and (3) unnecessary diagnostic MRI scans
![Page 21: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Possible Unanticipated Findings Management Plan Con’t
• If the neuroradiologist determines no referral is necessary, participant/SDM is not notified
• If neuroradiologist determines referral is appropriate: o Preparation of neuroradiologist’s reporto Communication with participant’s primary care
physician (PCP) and through PCP to participant/SDM, or directly with the participant where no PCP
• Decision to pursue further examinations and/or treatment (if available) is left with the participant/SDM
![Page 22: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Template Text for Unanticipated Findings Section of Consent Forms
• Presently developing template language for consent forms respecting a recommended approach to unanticipated findings
• Will be posted at: www.neuroethics.ca
![Page 23: Michael R. Hadskis Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061305/549ad14cb4795910098b45dc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Conclusions
• MRI research involving children has ethical and legal pitfalls that need to be further explored
• Real concerns around whether the current ethical and legal disclosure standards are being met (“Review of Paediatric MRI Protocols and Consent Forms by Canadian REBs”)
• Nature and seriousness of attendant harm has implications for ability or willingness to conduct MRI research involving children at all (therapeutic orphans)
• Pressing need for carefully-crafted management plans to deal with incidental/unexpected findings