mi-access reports— what good are they to me?

51
MI-Access MI-Access Reports— Reports— What Good are What Good are They to Me? They to Me? Prepared by Linda Headley, Prepared by Linda Headley, Headley Pratt Consulting Headley Pratt Consulting Fall 2007 Fall 2007

Upload: jeremy-butler

Post on 01-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

MI-Access Reports— What Good are They to Me?. Prepared by Linda Headley, Headley Pratt Consulting Fall 2007. Purpose of the Presentation. Introduce the new P/SI reports Introduce the new science elements Review FI report changes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

MI-Access MI-Access Reports—Reports—

What Good are What Good are They to Me?They to Me?

Prepared by Linda Headley, Prepared by Linda Headley, Headley Pratt ConsultingHeadley Pratt Consulting

Fall 2007Fall 2007

Page 2: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Purpose of the PresentationPurpose of the Presentation Introduce the new P/SI reportsIntroduce the new P/SI reports

Introduce the new science elementsIntroduce the new science elements

Review FI report changesReview FI report changes

Talk about how the results might be used Talk about how the results might be used to improve curriculum and instructionto improve curriculum and instruction

Page 3: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Three MI-Access AssessmentsThree MI-Access Assessments

Participation: For students who have, or function Participation: For students who have, or function as if they have, as if they have, severesevere cognitive impairment cognitive impairment

Supported Independence: For students who have, Supported Independence: For students who have, or function as if they have, or function as if they have, moderatemoderate cognitive cognitive impairmentimpairment

Functional Independence: For students who Functional Independence: For students who have, or function as if they have, have, or function as if they have, mildmild cognitive cognitive impairmentimpairment

Page 4: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Selecting the Right Selecting the Right AssessmentAssessment

The IEP Team determines which assessment is The IEP Team determines which assessment is appropriate appropriate

MI-Access Web page: MI-Access Web page: www.mi.gov/mi-access. . Look under “IEP Team Information” section. Look under “IEP Team Information” section.

The data will only be helpful IF the appropriate The data will only be helpful IF the appropriate assessment is selectedassessment is selected

Page 5: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Content Areas AssessedContent Areas Assessed All three populations will be assessed in three All three populations will be assessed in three

content areas this fallcontent areas this fall1)1) English language artsEnglish language arts2)2) MathematicsMathematics3)3) ScienceScience

ELA and mathematics will be assessed in grades 3-8ELA and mathematics will be assessed in grades 3-8

Science will be assessed in grades 5 and 8Science will be assessed in grades 5 and 8

Grade 11 MI-Access students will be assessed in spring Grade 11 MI-Access students will be assessed in spring 20082008

NOW OPERATIONAL!

Page 6: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Page 7: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

MI-Access ReportsMI-Access Reports

Report Titles

Online State

Results

District Results Folder

School Results Folder

Classroom Results Folder

Online Only

Individual Student Reports

X

Rosters X X X

Summary Reports X X X

Demographic Reports X X X

Item Analysis Reports X X X

Parent Reports X

Student Labels X

District Comprehensive X

ISD Comprehensive X

Page 8: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Individual Student Reports: DesignIndividual Student Reports: Design

Student demographic information Student performance

summary

Earned/points possible by

component or strand

Individual item analysis for

released items

Page 9: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Individual Student Report:Individual Student Report:Participation ELAParticipation ELA

04/20/23

NEW!

Page 10: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

How Participation Scores How Participation Scores are Derivedare Derived

• Two types of itemsTwo types of items• activity-based activity-based

observationobservation• selected-responseselected-response

• PAA and SAA observe PAA and SAA observe and score studentand score student

• PAA and SAA scores PAA and SAA scores are added together to are added together to determine total item determine total item pointspoints

MI-Access Participation Scoring Rubric

Score Point/Condition Code

Description

3Responds correctly with no assessment administrator assistance

2Responds correctly after assessment administrator provides verbal/physical cues

1Responds correctly after assessment administrator provides modeling, short of hand-over-hand assistance

A Incorrect response

B Resists/Refuses

CAssessment administrator provides hand-over-hand assistance and/or step-by-step directions

Page 11: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Individual Student Report:Individual Student Report:Supported Independence Supported Independence

MathematicsMathematics NEW!

Page 12: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

How SI Scores are DerivedHow SI Scores are Derived

• Two types of itemsTwo types of items• activity-based activity-based

observation (except observation (except science)science)

• selected-responseselected-response

• PAA and SAA observe PAA and SAA observe and score studentand score student

• PAA and SAA scores are PAA and SAA scores are added together to added together to determine total item determine total item pointspoints

MI-Access Supported Independence Scoring Rubric

Score Point/Condition Code

Description

2Responds correctly with no assessment administrator assistance

1Responds correctly after assessment administrator provides verbal/physical cues

A Incorrect response

B Resists/Refuses

CAssessment administrator provides hand-over-hand assistance and/or step-by-step directions

Page 13: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Individual Student Report:Individual Student Report:Participation ScienceParticipation Science

NEW!

Page 14: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Individual Student Report:Individual Student Report:Functional Independence ScienceFunctional Independence Science

NEW!

Page 15: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

How FI Scores are DerivedHow FI Scores are Derived

No scoring rubric for Functional IndependenceNo scoring rubric for Functional Independence

Only selected-response itemsOnly selected-response items

Student receives 1 point for each correct response Student receives 1 point for each correct response

The ONLY exception is ELA Expressing IdeasThe ONLY exception is ELA Expressing Ideas Open-ended response to a promptOpen-ended response to a prompt Scored using a 4-point rubricScored using a 4-point rubric Student receives may receive up to 4 points per promptStudent receives may receive up to 4 points per prompt

Page 16: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Other Differences:Other Differences:Condition CodesCondition Codes

P/SI Condition Codes: All Content AreasP/SI Condition Codes: All Content Areas− A = responds incorrectlyA = responds incorrectly− B = resists/refuses B = resists/refuses − C = responds only after the assessment administrator provides hand-C = responds only after the assessment administrator provides hand-

over-hand assistance or step-by-step directionsover-hand assistance or step-by-step directions

FI Condition Codes: ELA Expressing Ideas OnlyFI Condition Codes: ELA Expressing Ideas Only− A = off topic A = off topic − B = illegible B = illegible − C = written in a language other than EnglishC = written in a language other than English− D = blank/refused to respond D = blank/refused to respond

All condition codes = zero pointsAll condition codes = zero points

Page 17: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Other Differences:Other Differences:Performance Level ChangePerformance Level Change

STUDENT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Earned Points Possible: 0/45

Scale Score: 2391

Performance Level 2007: Emerging Toward the Performance Standard (High)

Performance Level 2006: Emerging Toward the Performance Standard (Low)

Performance Level Change: Improvement

ONLY for Functional Independence ELA and Mathematics

NEW!

Page 18: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Performance Level ChangePerformance Level Change

Fall 2006 Achievement

Fall 2007 Achievement

Emerging Attained Surpassed

Low Mid High Low High Low Mid High

Emerging

Low N I I SI SI SI SI SI

Mid D N I I SI SI SI SI

High D D N I I SI SI SI

AttainedLow SD D D N I I SI SI

High SD SD D D N I I SI

Surpassed

Low SD SD SD D D N I I

Mid SD SD SD SD D D N I

High SD SD SD SD SD D D N

SI = Significant Improvement; I = Improvement; N = No Change; D = Decline; SD = Significant Decline

Page 19: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Using ISRs for Using ISRs for Instruction and CurriculumInstruction and Curriculum

Compare ISR to other data you have for the student. Is this what you would Compare ISR to other data you have for the student. Is this what you would expect? expect?

If prior year and performance level change data are provided, is the If prior year and performance level change data are provided, is the student making progress over time?student making progress over time?

Using released item booklets (Using released item booklets (www.mi-access.info), match to curriculum ), match to curriculum and instruction. Has the student been taught this? If yes, are teaching and instruction. Has the student been taught this? If yes, are teaching methods effective for this student?methods effective for this student?

Identify strengths to reinforceIdentify strengths to reinforce

Identify areas where additional instruction is neededIdentify areas where additional instruction is needed

Confirm this is the right assessment for the student to takeConfirm this is the right assessment for the student to take

04/20/23

Page 20: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

RostersRosters

List scores by individual studentList scores by individual student

One report for each grade and content areaOne report for each grade and content area

Provided at class, school, and district levels (not Provided at class, school, and district levels (not state)state)

Page 21: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

RostersRostersShow number assessed and mean scale score or mean earned points

at top left

List results by student

Page 22: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

RostersRosters

For FI ELA and mathematics, shows current year scale

score, 2007 and 2006 performance level (high, mid,

and low), and performance level change

NEW!

Page 23: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

RostersRosters

Shows earned points by component or strand, EGLCE or EB, and overall

Page 24: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Using Rosters for Using Rosters for Instruction and CurriculumInstruction and Curriculum

Best place to gather information about live assessment items, Best place to gather information about live assessment items, because results are provided by EGLCE or EBbecause results are provided by EGLCE or EB

www.mi.gov/mi-access

Supported Independence Grade 5ELA: Comprehension Math: Geometry Science: Reflecting

R.NT.e4.SI.EGO4a

Identify what makes stories fiction vs. fact and why an author makes that

choice

G.LO.e1.SI.EGO2AA

Identify positions of objects in space using terms describing relative position (first, last, above, below, next to, etc.)

R.RO.SI.EB.II.1.e.4a

Develop an awareness of natural world.

Key concepts: Nature, observation, personal safety.

Real-world contexts: Caring for the environment; pollution; recycling;

water safety

Page 25: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Summary ReportsSummary Reports

Executive summaries of student scores Executive summaries of student scores

Provided at school, district, and state levelsProvided at school, district, and state levels

One report for each grade and each content area One report for each grade and each content area

assessed (ELA, mathematics, and/or science)assessed (ELA, mathematics, and/or science)

Report generated ONLY when there are 10 or more Report generated ONLY when there are 10 or more

students at the same grade level taking the same students at the same grade level taking the same

assessmentassessment

Page 26: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Supported Independence District Supported Independence District Summary Report: ELASummary Report: ELA

Summary results shown for current year at top right

Page 27: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Supported Independence District Supported Independence District Summary Report: ELASummary Report: ELA

04/20/23

Shows # and % of students that earned

each earned points total

Page 28: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Functional Independence Functional Independence Summary Reports: ELA and Mathematics Summary Reports: ELA and Mathematics

Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 ONLYONLY

Number and Percent of Students by Performance Level Change (from 2006 to 2007)

Fall 2006Fall 2007

Emerging Attained Surpassed

Emerging 104 (30.2%)

not gaining

8 (2.3%)

gaining

8 (2.3%)

gaining

Attained 32 (9.3%)

declining

24 (7.0%)

maintaining

8 (2.3%)

gaining

Surpassed 48 (14.0%)

declining

8 (2.3%)

declining

104 (30.2%)

maintaining

04/20/23

PERFORMACE LEVEL CHANGE — YEAR-TO-YEAR TRANSITIONS

Page 29: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Functional Independence Summary Functional Independence Summary Reports: Performance Level ChangeReports: Performance Level Change

““Gaining” means there was an improvement from 2006 to Gaining” means there was an improvement from 2006 to 20072007

““Maintaining” means scores that were “proficient” stayed the Maintaining” means scores that were “proficient” stayed the samesame

““Not gaining” means scores that were “not proficient” stayed Not gaining” means scores that were “not proficient” stayed the samethe same

““Declining” means there was a decline from 2006 to 2007Declining” means there was a decline from 2006 to 2007

Page 30: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Functional Independence Functional Independence Summary Reports: ELA and Mathematics Summary Reports: ELA and Mathematics

Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 ONLYONLY

Years Summarized

Students Matched# %

Performance Level Change

Significant Decline

# %

Decline

# %

No Change

# %

Improvement

# %

Significant Improvement

# %

2006 & 2007 344 93.5 88 25.6 0 0.0 232 67.4 0 0.0 24 7.0

04/20/23

PERFORMANCE LEVEL CHANGE — SUMMARY NEW!

Page 31: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Using Summary Reports for Using Summary Reports for Instruction and CurriculumInstruction and Curriculum

Look at progress collectively. How did our fifth graders do this year Look at progress collectively. How did our fifth graders do this year compared to last year? compared to last year?

Look at progress over time. Are there trends to be aware of?Look at progress over time. Are there trends to be aware of?

Compare state assessment data to other data. Is this what we Compare state assessment data to other data. Is this what we would expect?would expect?

Within the performance levels, where are clusters of students?Within the performance levels, where are clusters of students?

Page 32: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Functional Independence Functional Independence Summary Report: ScienceSummary Report: Science

Page 33: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

P/SI Parent ReportsP/SI Parent Reports

Page 1 shows student’s earned

points and performance level

for 2007

NEW!

Page 34: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Page 2 shows appropriate scoring rubric, and ELA and mathematics scores

by component or strand

NEW!

P/SI Parent ReportsP/SI Parent Reports

ELA

Mathematics

Page 35: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Page 3 shows science scores by strand and ELA

individual student item analysis

NEW!

P/SI Parent ReportsP/SI Parent Reports

Science

ELA

Page 36: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

Page 4 shows mathematics and science individual

student item analysis

NEW!

P/SI Parent ReportsP/SI Parent Reports

Mathematics

Science

Page 37: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Functional IndependenceFunctional Independence Parent Reports (Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8) Parent Reports (Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8)

Page 1 shows the student’s scale

score and performance level for 2007 and 2006.

Also shows “Performance Level Change”

from 2006 to 2007.

NEW!

Page 38: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Page 2 shows student’s earned points for ELA and mathematics, and his/her

scale scores in a range

ELA

Mathematics

Functional IndependenceFunctional Independence Parent Reports Parent Reports

Page 39: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Page 3 shows student’s earned points and scale score range for science. Also

shows the student’s item analysis for

ELA

Science

ELA

Functional IndependenceFunctional Independence Parent Reports Parent Reports

Page 40: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Page 4 shows student’s

individual item analysis

Science

Mathematics

Functional IndependenceFunctional Independence Parent Reports Parent Reports

Page 41: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Item AnalysesItem Analyses

Provide detailed, aggregated information on Provide detailed, aggregated information on released itemsreleased items

Can be used to identify areas of collective Can be used to identify areas of collective strengths and areas that need improvementstrengths and areas that need improvement

Provided at school, district, and state levelProvided at school, district, and state level

Provided only when 10 or more students in the Provided only when 10 or more students in the same grade take the same assessmentsame grade take the same assessment

Page 42: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

District Item Analysis: ELADistrict Item Analysis: ELA

Shows # and % of students who selected each answer choice for each released Word Recognition and Text Comprehension item

Page 43: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

District Item Analysis: ELADistrict Item Analysis: ELA

Shows the # and % of students at (1) each score based on a 4-point rubric, and (2) each condition code

Page 44: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

District Item Analysis: ELADistrict Item Analysis: ELA

Also shows the # and % of students that received specific comment codes

Page 45: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item AnalysesUsing Item Analyses

Use the Item Analysis Report Use the Item Analysis Report along with the Released Item along with the Released Item Booklet to identify collective Booklet to identify collective strengths and weaknesses strengths and weaknesses (available at (available at www.mi-access.info) )

Page 46: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item Analyses: Using Item Analyses: ELA State Fall 2006 ELA State Fall 2006 Least WellLeast Well

Functional Independence Grade Functional Independence Grade 33

Informational passage about a Informational passage about a chameleonchameleon

EGLCE being measured: Make EGLCE being measured: Make inferences, predictions, and inferences, predictions, and conclusionsconclusions

Only 62.1% answered the item Only 62.1% answered the item correctly (A)correctly (A)

C was the incorrect answer C was the incorrect answer chosen most often (23%)chosen most often (23%)

Page 47: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item Analyses: Using Item Analyses: ELA State Fall 2006 ELA State Fall 2006 BestBest

Same narrative passageSame narrative passage

EGLCE being measured: EGLCE being measured: Identify main ideas and Identify main ideas and details details

74.7% of students answered 74.7% of students answered the item correctly (B)the item correctly (B)

A was the incorrect answer A was the incorrect answer chosen most often (13%)chosen most often (13%)

Page 48: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item Analyses: Using Item Analyses: ELA State Fall 2006 Expressing IdeasELA State Fall 2006 Expressing Ideas

EGLCE being measured: EGLCE being measured: Write/draw personal narrativeWrite/draw personal narrative

Only 7% of students received Only 7% of students received a “4,” and 23% received a “3”a “4,” and 23% received a “3”

Comment code given most Comment code given most often = “Showed limited often = “Showed limited development with insufficient development with insufficient details and/or examples”details and/or examples”

Page 49: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item Analyses: Using Item Analyses: Math State Fall 2006 Math State Fall 2006 Least WellLeast Well

Functional Independence Functional Independence Grade 7 Grade 7

EGLCE being measured: EGLCE being measured: Solve problems using dataSolve problems using data

Only 33.6% answered Only 33.6% answered correctly (A)correctly (A)

C was the incorrect answer C was the incorrect answer chosen most often (54.6%)chosen most often (54.6%)

Page 50: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Item Analyses: Using Item Analyses: Mathematics State 2006 Mathematics State 2006 BestBest

EGLCE being measured: EGLCE being measured: Recognize representations Recognize representations for whole numbers to for whole numbers to 10,00010,000

96.5% answered correctly 96.5% answered correctly (C)(C)

B was the incorrect answer B was the incorrect answer chosen most often (2.2%)chosen most often (2.2%)

Page 51: MI-Access Reports— What Good are  They to Me?

04/20/23

Using Assessment ResultsUsing Assessment Results

““Results have the greatest impact when people are Results have the greatest impact when people are given opportunities to discuss them—teachers with given opportunities to discuss them—teachers with teachers, coordinators with teachers, coordinators teachers, coordinators with teachers, coordinators with coordinators, and teachers with parents. You with coordinators, and teachers with parents. You discover trends, identify anomalies, start asking discover trends, identify anomalies, start asking questions, and together seek answers.”questions, and together seek answers.”