mhu policy brief
TRANSCRIPT
8/7/2019 MHU Policy Brief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mhu-policy-brief 1/2
The researchpresented in thispolicy brief wasconducted by U. Dash,V. R. Muraleedharan,B. M. Prasad, D.Acharya, S. Dash, andS. Lakshminarasimhan.
he authors are based at the Departmentf Humanities and Social Sciences, Indianstitute of Technology, Madras; part of
he Consortium for Research on Equitable
ealth Systems (CREHS) and fundedy the Department for Internationalevelopment (DFID) UK.
his policy brief is based on a researcheport “Access to health services in underrivileged areas: a case study of Mobileealth Units in Tamil Nadu and Orissa”
full copy of this report is availablet: www.crehs.lshtm.ac.uk/downloads/ublications/Mobile_health_units.pdf
INCREASING ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES USING
MOBILE HEALTH UNITS
Implementation experiences in Tamil Nadu and Orissa State, India
INTRODUCTION
Mobile Health Units (MHUs) have been used as early as 1951 in tribal areas
of India, with the purpose of improving access to and utilization of health
services for people living in underserved and inaccessible areas. In order
to access a xed health facility, these populations have to travel up to
20 kilometres by foot, cart or private vehicle. The long distance and high
cost of transport can prohibit access to services, particularly during an
emergency.
MHUs vary between states but typically consist of a physician, apharmacist, an auxiliary nurse midwife, one or two paramedical staff,
and a driver. Those Units that do not have a van travel by local buses and,
when roads are blocked or inaccessible, walk several kilometres to reach
communities.
In India, the implementation and effective functioning of MHUs is the
responsibility of Primary Health Centres. Despite their importance for
reaching remote populations, the impact of MHUs on health care equity
is seldom taken into consideration during the planning stage. As a result,
several barriers to their effective implementation and performance
remain.
POLICY BRIEF
JULY 2009
KEY FINDINGS
RESEARCH QUESTION
The research assesses the role
of MHUs in providing access to
health services for underprivileged
populations.
Specically, it aims to: assess the
gains presented by MHUs, in terms
of access to care; to identify and
analyse factors which hinder or
enable the implementation of
MHUs; and, to propose policies to
improve the overall design and
implementation of MHUs.
METHODS USED
Secon• dary data from
government and other sources
Indept• h interviews with key
stakeholders
Primary survey data from•
communities that have used
MHUs, collected between
November 2006 and January2007.
Dir• ect observations on the
functioning of MHUs in two
States: Tamil Nadu and Orissa.
The community surveys found that 80% of the population had used•
MHUs during the past 3 months and, of this population, 90% travelled
less than one kilometre to reach the services.
Despite satisfaction with the location of MHUs, problems remained•
with the timing and regularity of visits. In several sites, MHUs reported
only once a fortnight or once a month, and, as a result, there was
often no effective follow up of patients.
On average, MHUs covered 40-60 patients over 3 hours, and the•
amount of time spent with each patient was 3 minutes. This raises
questions about the quality of care that they are able to deliver.
Some MHUs reliance on crowded buses to reach their destination•
prevented them from being able to carry diagnostic equipment such
as blood and urine tests. The limited services that MHUs offer means
that they could not always meet the requirements and expectations of
populations, for instance, to treat chronic diseases including diabetes,
or provide dental care.
When MHUs did reach very remote communities, there was sometimes•no space for private consultations, especially during rainy seasons.
Lack of privacy is an important barrier to seeking care, particularly for
young girls and women.
8/7/2019 MHU Policy Brief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mhu-policy-brief 2/2
This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for
International Development (DFID) for the benet of developing countries. The
views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.
Insufcient staff, compounded by a slow process•
of recruiting health personnel. Harsh working
conditions have made it particularly difcult to
attract medical professionals to work for MHUs.
Lack of nancial commitment from the•
government, especially in Tamil Nadu, means that
MHUs are underfunded, limiting the services that
they are able to offer and preventing essential
maintenance of vehicles. This is partly due to
frequent changes of policy makers who direct
little attention towards MHUs.
NGOs have not been involved in running MHUs,•
even though, in some districts, they also provide
health services to underserved communities. In
Tamil Nadu, this failure to collaborate is due to alack of clear policy guidelines.
Insufcient planning has resulted in infrequent•
eld visits by MHUs. When MHUs have not visited
communities as scheduled, it has been difcult
to gain their condence and provide high quality
care.
Systems for monitoring MHUs and providing•
feedback are particularly weak. In some sites
there were no records of services delivered and
patient numbers.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
www.crehs.lshtm.ac.uk
The ndings suggest that MHUs have reduced geographical barriers to accessing health services for people living
in remote and inaccessible areas. However, serious questions remain about the quality of health care that they
can provide. The following recommendations may improve the performance of MHUs:
The state government should set out a budget for MHUs and ensure expenditure for this amount. This is•
extremely important as it indicates government’s commitment to improving access to health care in under-
served and inaccessible regions. When planning this budget, the government should work out a denite
package of essential services that can be delivered by MHUs.
The government should consider introducing measures that will attract health professionals to serve in•
remote areas. These could include nancial incentives. Providing a vehicle which is in good condition and a
driver may also attract health workers to work in MHUs.
Operational research should be undertaken with a view to improving the performance of MHUs. This can•
include studies on the scheduling of vehicles and site visits in order to maximise the coverage of MHUs.
Sustained efforts should be made to improve the planning capacity of district level ofcials so that they can•
carry out careful mapping and scheduling of visits, and develop trusting relationships with the communities
that they serve.
CHALLENGES TO THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF MOBILE HEALTH UNITS
Several factors have contributed to the poor performance of MHUs. These include:
Patients wait in a queue to get medicine from a
mobile health unit in Tamil Nadu